Celtis Tenuifolia) in Ontario

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Dwarf Hackberry

(Celtis tenuifolia) in Ontario

Ontario Recovery Strategy Series

Recovery strategy prepared under the Endangered Species Act, 2007

2013

Ministry of Natural Resources

About the Ontario Recovery Strategy Series

This series presents the collection of recovery strategies that are prepared or adopted as advice to the Province of Ontario on the recommended approach to recover species at risk. The Province ensures the preparation of recovery strategies to meet its commitments to recover species at risk under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada.

  • What is recovery?
  • What’s next?

Recovery of species at risk is the process by which the decline of an endangered, threatened, or extirpated species is arrested or reversed, and threats are removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of a species’ persistence in the wild.
Nine months after the completion of a recovery strategy a government response statement will be published which summarizes the actions that the Government of Ontario intends to take in response to the strategy. The implementation of recovery strategies depends on the continued cooperation and actions of government agencies, individuals, communities, land users, and conservationists.

What is a recovery strategy?

Under the ESA a recovery strategy provides the best available scientific knowledge on what is required to achieve recovery of a species. A recovery strategy outlines the habitat needs and the threats to the survival and recovery of the species. It also makes recommendations on the objectives for protection and recovery, the approaches to achieve those objectives, and the area that should be considered in the development of a habitat regulation. Sections 11 to 15 of the ESA outline the required content and timelines for developing recovery strategies published in this series.

For more information

To learn more about species at risk recovery in Ontario, please visit the Ministry of Natural Resources Species at

Risk webpage at: www.ontario.ca/speciesatrisk

Recovery strategies are required to be prepared for endangered and threatened species within one or two years respectively of the species being added to the Species at Risk in Ontario list. There is a transition period of five years (until June 30, 2013) to develop recovery strategies for those species listed as endangered or threatened in the schedules of the ESA. Recovery strategies are required to be prepared for extirpated species only if reintroduction is considered feasible.

Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry in Ontario

RECOMMENDED CITATION

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. 2013. Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry (Celtis tenuifolia) in Ontario. Ontario Recovery Strategy Series. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario. iii + 5 pp + Appendix vi + 43 pp. Adoption of Recovery Strategy for Dwarf Hackberry (Celtis tenuifolia) in Canada (Parks Canada Agency 2011).

Cover illustration: Photo by Allen Woodliffe

© Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2013 ISBN 978-1-4606-0537-0 (PDF)

Content (excluding the cover illustration) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source.

Cette publication hautement spécialisée Recovery strategies prepared under the Endangered Species Act, 2007, n’est disponible qu’en anglais en vertu du Règlement 411/97 qui en exempte l’application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en français, veuillez communiquer avec Cathy Darevic au ministère des Richesses naturelles au 705-755-5580.

i

Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry in Ontario

DECLARATION

The recovery strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry was developed in accordance with the requirements of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA). This recovery strategy has been prepared as advice to the Government of Ontario, other responsible jurisdictions and the many different constituencies that may be involved in recovering the species.

The recovery strategy does not necessarily represent the views of all of the individuals who provided advice or contributed to its preparation, or the official positions of the organizations with which the individuals are associated.

The goals, objectives and recovery approaches identified in the strategy are based on the best available knowledge and are subject to revision as new information becomes available. Implementation of this strategy is subject to appropriations, priorities and budgetary constraints of the participating jurisdictions and organizations.

Success in the recovery of this species depends on the commitment and cooperation of many different constituencies that will be involved in implementing the directions set out in this strategy.

RESPONSIBLE JURISDICTIONS

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Environment Canada – Canadian Wildlife Service, Ontario Parks Canada Agency

ii

Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry in Ontario

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RECOMMENDED CITATION........................................................................................... i DECLARATION................................................................................................................ii RESPONSIBLE JURISDICTIONS ...................................................................................ii ADOPTION OF RECOVERY STRATEGY ...................................................................... 1
Species Assessment and Classification ...................................................................... 1 Area for Consideration in Developing a Habitat Regulation......................................... 1
GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................... 3 APPENDIX 1 - Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry (Celtis tenuifolia) in Canada4

iii

Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry in Ontario

ADOPTION OF RECOVERY STRATEGY

The Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) requires the Minister of Natural Resources to ensure recovery strategies are prepared for all species listed as endangered or threatened on the Species at Risk in Ontario (SARO) List. Under the ESA, a recovery strategy may incorporate all or part of an existing plan that relates to the species.

The Dwarf Hackberry (Celtis tenuifolia) is listed as threatened on the SARO List. The species is also listed as threatened under the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA). Parks Canada Agency prepared the Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry in Canada in September, 2011 to meet its requirements under the SARA. This recovery strategy is hereby adopted under the ESA. With the additions indicated below, the enclosed strategy meets all of the content requirements outlined in the ESA.

Species Assessment and Classification

COMMON NAME: Dwarf Hackberry

SCIENTIFIC NAME: Celtis tenuifolia

SARO List Classification: Threatened SARO List History: Threatened (2004) COSEWIC Assessment History: Threatened (2003), Special Concern (1985) SARA Schedule 1: Threatened (July 27, 2005) CONSERVATION STATUS RANKINGS:

  • GRANK: G5
  • NRANK: N2
  • SRANK: S2

The glossary provides definitions for technical terms, including the abbreviations above.

Area for Consideration in Developing a Habitat Regulation

Under the ESA, a recovery strategy must include a recommendation to the Minister of Natural Resources on the area that should be considered in developing a habitat regulation. A   habitat regulation is a legal instrument that prescribes an area that will be protected as the habitat of the species.   The recommendation provided below will be one of many sources considered by the Minister when developing the habitat regulation for this species.

Section 7 of the federal recovery strategy provides an identification of critical habitat (as defined under the SARA). Identification of critical habitat is not a component of a

1

Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry in Ontario

recovery strategy prepared under the ESA. However, it is recommended that the approach used to identify critical habitat in Section 7 be considered when developing a habitat regulation under the ESA.

2

Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry in Ontario

GLOSSARY

Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC): The committee established under section 14 of the Species at Risk Act that is responsible for assessing and classifying species at risk in Canada.

Committee on the Status of Species at Risk in Ontario (COSSARO): The committee established under section 3 of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 that is responsible for assessing and classifying species at risk in Ontario.

Conservation status rank: A rank assigned to a species or ecological community that primarily conveys the degree of rarity of the species or community at the global (G), national (N) or subnational (S) level. These ranks, termed G-rank, N-rank and S-rank, are not legal designations. The conservation status of a species or ecosystem is designated by a number from 1 to 5, preceded by the letter G, N or S reflecting the appropriate geographic scale of the assessment. The numbers mean the following:
1 = critically imperilled 2 = imperilled 3 = vulnerable 4 = apparently secure 5 = secure

Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA): The provincial legislation that provides protection to species at risk in Ontario.

Species at Risk Act (SARA): The federal legislation that provides protection to species at risk in Canada. This act establishes Schedule 1 as the legal list of wildlife species at risk. Schedules 2 and 3 contain lists of species that at the time the Act came into force needed to be reassessed. After species on Schedule 2 and 3 are reassessed and found to be at risk, they undergo the SARA listing process to be included in Schedule 1.

Species at Risk in Ontario (SARO) List: The regulation made under section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act, 2007 that provides the official status classification of species at risk in Ontario. This list was first published in 2004 as a policy and became a regulation in 2008.

3

Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry in Ontario

APPENDIX 1 - Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry (Celtis tenuifolia) in Canada

4

Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry in Ontario

5

Species at Risk Act

Recovery Strategy Series

Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry

(Celtis tenuifolia) in Canada

Dwarf Hackberry

2011

Recommended citation:

Parks Canada Agency. 2011. Recovery Strategy for Dwarf Hackberry (Celtis tenuifolia) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Parks Canada Agency. Ottawa. vi + 43 pp.

For copies of the recovery strategy, or for additional information on species at risk, including COSEWIC Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk Public Registry (www.sararegistry.gc.ca).

Cover illustration: K. Dunster, 2009.

Également disponible en français sous le titre « Programme de rétablissement du micocoulier rabougri (Celtis tenuifolia) au Canada »

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2011. All rights reserved. ISBN : 978-1-100-19304-5 Catalogue no.: En3-4/118-2011E-PDF

Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source.

  • Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry
  • 2011

PREFACE

The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996) agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada. Under the Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c.29) (SARA), the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of recovery strategies for listed Extirpated, Endangered, and Threatened species and are required to report on progress within five years.

The Minister responsible for the Parks Canada Agency and Environment Canada (the Minister of the Environment) is the competent minister for the recovery of the Dwarf Hackberry and has prepared this strategy, as per section 37 of SARA. It has been prepared in cooperation with Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, including Ontario Parks, the Department of National Defence, First Nations, local government and non-government organizations, and independent experts.

Success in the recovery of this species depends on the commitment and cooperation of many different constituencies that will be involved in implementing the directions set out in this strategy and will not be achieved by Parks Canada Agency and Environment Canada, or any other jurisdiction alone. All Canadians are invited to join in supporting and implementing this strategy for the benefit of the Dwarf Hackberry and Canadian society as a whole.

This recovery strategy will be followed by one or more action plans that will provide information on recovery measures to be taken by Parks Canada Agency and Environment Canada and other jurisdictions and/or organizations involved in the conservation of the species. Implementation of this strategy is subject to appropriations, priorities, and budgetary constraints of the participating jurisdictions and organizations

i

  • Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry
  • 2011

RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVAL STATEMENT

The Parks Canada Agency led the development of this federal recovery strategy, working together with the other competent minister for this species under the Species at Risk Act. The Chief Executive Officer, upon recommendation of the relevant Park Superintendent and Field Unit Superintendent, hereby approves this document indicating that Species at Risk Act requirements related to recovery strategy development (sections 37-42) have been fulfilled in accordance with the Act.

ii

  • Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry
  • 2011

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Background information was gathered and assembled into this recovery strategy by Katherine Dunster of Unfolding Landscapes. The recovery components of this document were developed during a two-day recovery strategy writing workshop. The final document was then assembled and refined by Katherine Dunster and Vicki McKay, Species at Risk Recovery Specialist, Parks Canada Agency (PCA), following reviews by agencies, non-government organizations, and individuals.

The following recovery strategy writing workshop participants provided significant input into the formation of this document: Marie Archambault, Vicki McKay, and Kara Vlasman (PCA); Jennifer Rowland (Department of National Defence); Chief Louise Hillier and Liz Wenzler (Caldwell First Nation); Sandy Dobbyn and Margie Wilkes (Ontario Parks, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources [OMNR]); Malcolm Boyd (Lambton Wildlife Inc.); and John Ambrose and Katherine Dunster (independents). Thanks are also due to workshop facilitators Steve and Cobi Sauder of Kayak Consulting. Mike Oldham, Wasyl Bakowsky, Sam Brinker, Martina Furrer, and Mikhail Paramonov (Natural Heritage Information Centre, OMNR); Todd Norris and Karen Hartley (OMNR); Mhairi McFarlane (Nature Conservancy of Canada); Muriel Andreae and Chris Durand (St. Clair Region Conservation Authority); Tracey Boitson (Ausable Bayfield Conservation Authority); Sharlene Polman (Lower Trent Conservation); Amy Dickens (Quinte Conservation); and John Ambrose, Malcolm Boyd, Vivian Brownell, and Donald Craig (independents) provided records, data layers, and/or insight into species observations and locations. Marie Archambault and Sandy Dobbyn and Laura Bjorgan (Ontario Parks, OMNR) are thanked for their critical habitat contributions. Josh Keitel (PCA) determined the Canadian extent of occurrence and completed critical habitat and Canadian distribution mapping. Valerie Minelga (PCA) assisted with the strategic environmental assessment and Richard Pelltier (U.S. Geological Survey) determined the proportion of Dwarf Hackberry’s area of occupancy within Canada.

iii

  • Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry
  • 2011

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Dwarf Hackberry (Celtis tenuifolia), designated as Threatened in Canada, is a small, stifflybranched, tree. It typically reproduces sexually and requires fruit-eating birds for long-distance

seed dispersal. A number of species depend on it and other hackberry species for their life cycles.

As a disjunct species, Dwarf Hackberry is found over 1 000 km north of the geographical centre of its range in six naturally isolated and fragmented southern Ontario populations. Here, it has adapted to two very different, marginal substrates – dry, sandy soils found along

the dynamic shores of Lake Erie, in the more stabilized inland dunes paralleling the Lake Huron shoreline, and on kame ridge tops above the Trent River and on Hastings County and formerly

on Pelee Island alvars. It is moderately shade intolerant, requiring prairie or savanna habitats or forest canopy edges or openings for seedling survival. Dwarf Hackberry is restricted to several rare plant communities, with a limited southern Ontario distribution. In Essex and Lambton Counties, it occurs in popular, coastal recreation areas. In Hastings County, it is found on private properties valued for their sand and limestone resources.

With the exception of Point Pelee National Park, population sizes are thought to be relatively stable. A new Lambton County survey has documented many more trees than were previously thought to exist and more are expected to be discovered with future surveys. The range wide

number of known, naturally-occurring, mature (fruit-producing) trees and saplings (over 1.0 m in height) is currently around 7 200 individuals. In addition, over 1 500 seedlings occur, most in the Lambton County population.

In order to recover the species, altered or lost disturbance regimes that normally limit habitat succession, detrimental species (bark beetles; snails; White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus); as well as exotic, invasive, and allelopathic plants), inappropriate logging, development, aggregate extraction, and the impacts of recreational activities need to be addressed.

The population and distribution objectives for Dwarf Hackberry are 1) to halt the apparently steep decline in the species’ population size at Point Pelee National Park and 2) to maintain populations at the other five extant locations (Pelee Island, Lambton County, Point Anne Alvar, Stirling Slope Complex Area of Natural and Scientific Interest [ANSI], and Salmon River Alvar ANSI [Lonsdale]) in suitable habitat.

The broad strategies to be taken to address the threats to the survival and recovery of the species are presented in Section 6.2, Strategic Direction for Recovery.

This recovery strategy identifies critical habitat for the Dwarf Hackberry in Canada, to the extent possible at this time, based on the best available information. Occupancy-based approaches (appropriate vegetation types where available and a tree root zone approach that includes intervening, suitable habitat in other situations) are used. Activities likely to result in the destruction of critical habitat have been identified, while a schedule of studies lists the additional steps required to complete critical habitat identification. One or more action plans will be completed for the Dwarf Hackberry by June 2016.

iv

  • Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry
  • 2011

RECOVERY FEASIBILITY SUMMARY

Recovery of Dwarf Hackberry in Canada is considered biologically and technically feasible. The species meets all four criteria for assessing the feasibility of recovery presented in the draft Government of Canada Species at Risk Act Policies (2009), as described below.

1) Individuals of the wildlife species that are capable of reproduction are available now or in the foreseeable future to sustain the population or improve its abundance.

Yes. Reproductive populations remain in the protected areas of Point Pelee National Park (mainland), Fish Point Provincial Nature Reserve (Pelee Island), and The Pinery Provincial Park (Lambton County). Substantial reproductive populations also remain in and around the Lambton County Heritage Forest (Lambton County). Six additional Lambton County sites have several to multiple trees of reproductive age. These populations will help to ensure the survival of Dwarf Hackberry and could act as source populations should plantings be required for species recovery. In addition, the University of Guelph Arboretum maintains a living gene bank of Dwarf Hackberry trees from Canadian (Ontario) populations that are producing seeds suitable for repatriation efforts.

2) Sufficient suitable habitat is available to support the species or could be made available through habitat management or restoration.

Yes. Sufficient habitat is currently available to support the species, particularly in its core Canadian range along the eastern shore of Lake Huron and the north shore of Lake Erie. Dunster (1992) suggests that the species has not fully exploited available habitats, or reached its potential climatic range limits. Suitable habitat is being maintained through natural processes acting in the dynamic, coastal shoreline environments where Dwarf Hackberry is typically found and/or is being restored there (e.g. at Point Pelee National Park). Habitat at inland sites is being maintained to some extent by other forms of disturbance and/or limiting conditions (e.g. the temperature extremes and limited nutrient availability found in alvars).

Recommended publications
  • Caterpillars Moths Butterflies Woodies

    Caterpillars Moths Butterflies Woodies

    NATIVE Caterpillars Moths and utter flies Band host NATIVE Hackberry Emperor oodies PHOTO : Megan McCarty W Double-toothed Prominent Honey locust Moth caterpillar Hackberry Emperor larva PHOTO : Douglas Tallamy Big Poplar Sphinx Number of species of Caterpillars n a study published in 2009, Dr. Oaks (Quercus) 557 Beeches (Fagus) 127 Honey-locusts (Gleditsia) 46 Magnolias (Magnolia) 21 Double-toothed Prominent ( Nerice IDouglas W. Tallamy, Ph.D, chair of the Cherries (Prunus) 456 Serviceberry (Amelanchier) 124 New Jersey Tea (Ceanothus) 45 Buttonbush (Cephalanthus) 19 bidentata ) larvae feed exclusively on elms Department of Entomology and Wildlife Willows (Salix) 455 Larches or Tamaracks (Larix) 121 Sycamores (Platanus) 45 Redbuds (Cercis) 19 (Ulmus), and can be found June through Ecology at the University of Delaware Birches (Betula) 411 Dogwoods (Cornus) 118 Huckleberry (Gaylussacia) 44 Green-briar (Smilax) 19 October. Their body shape mimics the specifically addressed the usefulness of Poplars (Populus) 367 Firs (Abies) 117 Hackberry (Celtis) 43 Wisterias (Wisteria) 19 toothed shape of American elm, making native woodies as host plants for our Crabapples (Malus) 308 Bayberries (Myrica) 108 Junipers (Juniperus) 42 Redbay (native) (Persea) 18 them hard to spot. The adult moth is native caterpillars (and obviously Maples (Acer) 297 Viburnums (Viburnum) 104 Elders (Sambucus) 42 Bearberry (Arctostaphylos) 17 small with a wingspan of 3-4 cm. therefore moths and butterflies). Blueberries (Vaccinium) 294 Currants (Ribes) 99 Ninebark (Physocarpus) 41 Bald cypresses (Taxodium) 16 We present here a partial list, and the Alders (Alnus) 255 Hop Hornbeam (Ostrya) 94 Lilacs (Syringa) 40 Leatherleaf (Chamaedaphne) 15 Honey locust caterpillar feeds on honey number of Lepidopteran species that rely Hickories (Carya) 235 Hemlocks (Tsuga) 92 Hollies (Ilex) 39 Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron) 15 locust, and Kentucky coffee trees.
  • Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States

    Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States

    Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States September 1993 OTA-F-565 NTIS order #PB94-107679 GPO stock #052-003-01347-9 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1993). For Sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office ii Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop, SSOP. Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN O-1 6-042075-X Foreword on-indigenous species (NIS)-----those species found beyond their natural ranges—are part and parcel of the U.S. landscape. Many are highly beneficial. Almost all U.S. crops and domesticated animals, many sport fish and aquiculture species, numerous horticultural plants, and most biologicalN control organisms have origins outside the country. A large number of NIS, however, cause significant economic, environmental, and health damage. These harmful species are the focus of this study. The total number of harmful NIS and their cumulative impacts are creating a growing burden for the country. We cannot completely stop the tide of new harmful introductions. Perfect screening, detection, and control are technically impossible and will remain so for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, the Federal and State policies designed to protect us from the worst species are not safeguarding our national interests in important areas. These conclusions have a number of policy implications. First, the Nation has no real national policy on harmful introductions; the current system is piecemeal, lacking adequate rigor and comprehensiveness. Second, many Federal and State statutes, regulations, and programs are not keeping pace with new and spreading non-indigenous pests.
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution

    The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution

    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
  • Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve

    Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve

    Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve Arthropods are characterized by having jointed limbs and exoskeletons. They include a diverse assortment of creatures: Insects, spiders, crustaceans (crayfish, crabs, pill bugs), centipedes and millipedes among others. Column Headings Scientific Name: The phenomenal diversity of arthropods, creates numerous difficulties in the determination of species. Positive identification is often achieved only by specialists using obscure monographs to ‘key out’ a species by examining microscopic differences in anatomy. For our purposes in this survey of the fauna, classification at a lower level of resolution still yields valuable information. For instance, knowing that ant lions belong to the Family, Myrmeleontidae, allows us to quickly look them up on the Internet and be confident we are not being fooled by a common name that may also apply to some other, unrelated something. With the Family name firmly in hand, we may explore the natural history of ant lions without needing to know exactly which species we are viewing. In some instances identification is only readily available at an even higher ranking such as Class. Millipedes are in the Class Diplopoda. There are many Orders (O) of millipedes and they are not easily differentiated so this entry is best left at the rank of Class. A great deal of taxonomic reorganization has been occurring lately with advances in DNA analysis pointing out underlying connections and differences that were previously unrealized. For this reason, all other rankings aside from Family, Genus and Species have been omitted from the interior of the tables since many of these ranks are in a state of flux.
  • Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs

    Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs

    INSECTS THAT FEED ON COLORADO TREES AND SHRUBS1 Whitney Cranshaw David Leatherman Boris Kondratieff Bulletin 506A TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFOLIATORS .................................................... 8 Leaf Feeding Caterpillars .............................................. 8 Cecropia Moth ................................................ 8 Polyphemus Moth ............................................. 9 Nevada Buck Moth ............................................. 9 Pandora Moth ............................................... 10 Io Moth .................................................... 10 Fall Webworm ............................................... 11 Tiger Moth ................................................. 12 American Dagger Moth ......................................... 13 Redhumped Caterpillar ......................................... 13 Achemon Sphinx ............................................. 14 Table 1. Common sphinx moths of Colorado .......................... 14 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth ....................................... 15 1. Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension etnomologist and associate professor, entomology; David Leatherman, entomologist, Colorado State Forest Service; Boris Kondratieff, associate professor, entomology. 8/93. ©Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1994. For more information, contact your county Cooperative Extension office. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
  • Sugarberry Plant Fact Sheet

    Sugarberry Plant Fact Sheet

    Plant Fact Sheet Wildlife: Many species of songbirds including SUGARBERRY mockingbirds and robins eat the fruit and use the tree for nesting habitat. It is a larval and nectar host for two Celtis laevigata Willd. butterflies: hackberry emperor (Asterocampa celtis) and Plant Symbol = CELA American snout (Libytheana carineta). White-tailed deer browse the leaves and fruit. Contributed by: USDA NRCS Plant Materials Program Other Uses: Sugarberry is used for furniture, athletic goods, firewood, and plywood. It has limited use for flooring, creating, and for wood posts. It is used as an ornamental and as a street tree in residential areas in the lower South Status Please consult the PLANTS Web site and your State Department of Natural Resources for this plant’s current status (e.g. threatened or endangered species, state noxious status, and wetland indicator values). Description and Adaptation Sugarberry is a native tree that can grow up to 80 feet in height and up to 3 feet in diameter. It is a short lived tree, probably living not more than 150 years. It has a broad crown formed by spreading branches that are often drooped. The bark is light gray in color and can be smooth or covered with corky warts. The branchlets are covered with short hairs at first and eventually they become smooth. The leaves are alternated, simple, and slightly serrate. The leaves are 2-4 inches long and 1 to 2 Robert H. Mohlenbrock. USDA SCS, 1989. Midwest wetland flora: inches wide. The lance-shaped leaves gradually taper to a Field office illustrated guide to plant species.
  • Common Species

    Common Species on District Lands The Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) manages water resources in the west- central portion of Florida according to legislative mandates. The District uses public land acquisition funds to protect key lands for water resources. The natural communities, plants and animals on these lands also benefi t from a level of protection that can be experienced and enjoyed through recreational opportunities made available on District lands. Every year, approximately 2.5 million people visit the more than 436,000 acres of public conservation lands acquired by the District and its partners. The lands are open to the public for activities such as hiking, bicycling, hunting, horseback riding, fi shing, camping, picnicking and studying nature. The District provides these recreational opportunities so that residents may experience healthy natural communities. An array of natural landscapes is available from the meandering Outstanding Florida Southwest Florida Water Management District Waters riverine systems, the cypress domes and strands, swamps and hammocks, to the scrub, sandhill, and pine fl atwoods. The Common Species on District Lands brochure provides insight to what you may experience while recreating on public lands managed by the District. CONSERVATION LANDS Southwest Florida Water Management District Mammals Southwest Florida Water Management District iStock W Barbour - Smithsonian Institute Roger Virginia Brazilian Opossum Free-Tailed Bat Didelphis virginiana Tadarida brasiliensis iStock Ivy
  • Butterflies and Moths List

    Butterflies and Moths List

    Lepidoptera of Kirchoff Family Farm Baseline Survey October 29-30, 2012 Butterflies & Moths Host Plant Species Present Date Butterflies Observed On Larval Host Plants Kirchoff FF observed Family Papilionidae (Swallowtails) Pipevine Swallowtail - Battus philenor Spiny Aster Pipevine √ Oct. 30, 2012 Family Pieridae (Whites & Sulfurs) Cloudless Sulfur - Phoebis sennae Spiny Aster Legumes, clovers, peas √ Oct. 29, 2012 Dainty Sulfur - Nathalis iole Spiny Aster Asters, other Com;posites √ Oct. 29, 2012 Little Yellow Sulfur - Eurema lisa Indian Mallow Legumes, partridge pea √ Oct. 29, 2012 Lyside Sulfur - Kirgonia lyside Spiny Aster Guayacan or Soapbush √ Oct. 29, 2012 Orange Sulfur - Colias eurytheme Spiny Aster Legumes √ Sept. 26, 2007 Family Lycaenidae (Gossamer Winged) Cassius Blue - Leptotes cassius Spiny Aster Legumes √ Oct. 30, 2012 Ceraunus Blue - Hemiargus ceraunus Kidney wood Legumes- Acacia, Mesquite √ Oct. 30, 2012 Fatal Metalmark - Calephelis nemesis Spiny Aster Baccharis, Clematis √ Oct. 29, 2012 Gray Hairstreak - Strymon melinus Frostweed, Aster Many flowering plants √ Oct. 29, 2012 Great Purple Hairstreak - Atlides halesus Spiny Aster Mistletoe (in oak/mesquite) √ Oct. 29, 2012 Marine Blue - Leptotes marina Frogfruit Legumes- Acacia, Mesquite √ Oct. 30, 2012 Family Nymphalidae (Nymphalids) American Snout - Libytheana carinenta Spiny Aster Hackberries √ Oct. 29, 2012 Bordered Patch - Chlosyne lacinia Zexmenia Ragweed, Sunflower √ Oct. 29, 2012 Common Mestra - Mestra amymone Frostweed Noseburn (Tragia spp.) X Oct. 29, 2012 Empress Leila - Asterocampa leilia Spiny Aster Spiny Hackberry √ Oct. 29, 2012 Gulf Fritillary - Agraulis vanillae Spiny Aster Passion Vine X Oct. 29, 2012 Hackberry Emperor - Asterocampa celtis spiny Hackberry Hackberries √ Oct. 29, 2012 Painted Lady - Vanessa cardui Pink Smartweed Mallows & Thistles √ Oct. 29, 2012 Pearl Crescent - Phycoides tharos Spiny Aster Asters √ Oct.
  • Dwarf Hackberry RS 2010

    Dwarf Hackberry RS 2010

    Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry (Celtis tenuifolia) in Canada Dwarf Hackberry 2011 Recommended citation: Parks Canada Agency. 2011. Recovery Strategy for Dwarf Hackberry (Celtis tenuifolia) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Parks Canada Agency. Ottawa. vi + 43 pp. For copies of the recovery strategy, or for additional information on species at risk, including COSEWIC Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk Public Registry (www.sararegistry.gc.ca). Cover illustration: K. Dunster, 2009. Également disponible en français sous le titre « Programme de rétablissement du micocoulier rabougri (Celtis tenuifolia) au Canada » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2011. All rights reserved. ISBN : 978-1-100-19304-5 Catalogue no.: En3-4/118-2011E-PDF Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. Recovery Strategy for the Dwarf Hackberry 2011 PREFACE The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996) agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada. Under the Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c.29) (SARA), the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of recovery strategies for listed Extirpated, Endangered, and Threatened species and are required to report on progress within five years. The Minister responsible for the Parks Canada Agency and Environment Canada (the Minister of the Environment) is the competent minister for the recovery of the Dwarf Hackberry and has prepared this strategy, as per section 37 of SARA.
  • Conservation of the Arogos Skipper, Atrytone Arogos Arogos (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in Florida Marc C

    Conservation of the Arogos Skipper, Atrytone Arogos Arogos (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in Florida Marc C

    Conservation of the Arogos Skipper, Atrytone arogos arogos (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in Florida Marc C. Minno St. Johns River Water Management District P.O. Box 1429, Palatka, FL 32177 [email protected] Maria Minno Eco-Cognizant, Inc., 600 NW 35th Terrace, Gainesville, FL 32607 [email protected] ABSTRACT The Arogos skipper is a rare and declining butterfly found in native grassland habitats in the eastern and mid- western United States. Five distinct populations of the butterfly occur in specific parts of the range. Atrytone arogos arogos once occurred from southern South Carolina through eastern Georgia and peninsular Florida as far south as Miami. This butterfly is currently thought to be extirpated from South Carolina and Georgia. The six known sites in Florida for A. arogos arogos are public lands with dry prairie or longleaf pine savanna having an abundance of the larval host grass, Sorghastrum secundum. Colonies of the butterfly are threat- ened by catastrophic events such as wild fires, land management activities or no management, and the loss of genetic integrity. The dry prairie preserves of central Florida will be especially important to the recovery of the butterfly, since these are some of the largest and last remaining grasslands in the state. It may be possible to create new colonies of the Arogos skipper by releasing wild-caught females or captive-bred individuals into currently unoccupied areas of high quality habitat. INTRODUCTION tered colonies were found in New Jersey, North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, and Mississippi. The three re- gions where the butterfly was most abundant included The Arogos skipper (Atrytone arogos) is a very locally the New Jersey pine barrens, peninsular Florida, and distributed butterfly that occurs only in the eastern and southeastern Mississippi.
  • In This Issue: Upcoming Programs

    In This Issue: Upcoming Programs

    Volume 17, Number 3 September 2016 G’num* The newsletter of the Washington Butterfly Association P.O. Box 31317 Seattle WA 98103 http://wabutterflyassoc.org *G’num is the official greeting of WBA. It is derived from the name of common Washington butterfly food plants, of the genus Eriogonum. Starting up to Mt. Howard at the annual conference. (J. Baumann) In this issue: Watching Washington Butterflies p 2 Species Profile p 4 Trip Reports p 6 Conference Report p 7 President’s Message p 9 Upcoming Programs September 7, Seattle, and Sept. 21, Spokane: Share the Wealth. Always an entertaining, fun and educational pro- gram. Bring your photos to share with us for education, entertainment or identification. Everyone works together to make this fun. Bring photos in digital, slide or printed form to be identified or just shared. This informal meeting gives members a chance to get to know each other better. All levels of photography and butterflying are encouraged and ap- preciated. September 12, 6:30-7:30pm UW Botanic Gardens presents Taylor’s Checkerspot: An Endangered Butterfly With an Interesting Diet. Taylor’s checkerspot is an endangered butterfly that occurs only in prairies of the Pacific Northwest. Several agencies and nonprofits are involved in recovery efforts, which include habitat restoration and a captive rearing and release pro- gram. There are several gaps in our knowledge of Taylor’s checkerspot that make recovery efforts difficult; we know (Continued on page 9) Washington Butterfly Association G’num pg 1 Watching Washington Butterflies with Bob Pyle Number Twenty-six Are There Hackberry Butterflies in Washington? Part Four: The Third Expedition My hackberry henchman, Dr.
  • Hackberry Emperor

    Hackberry Emperor

    Hackberry Emperor Hackberry Emperors are common throughout Alabama. They fly spring through fall in or near deciduous woodlands that support hackberry trees. Males perch on tree trunks and branches where they are commonly encountered; females are less visible. Hackberry Emperors have a distinctive flap and glide flight pattern. These butterflies seldom nectar from flowers, preferring sap, rotting fruit, and carrion. They frequently engage in puddling. © Sara Bright • Sexes are similar, although males are slightly smaller and have more pointed wings. • Coloration is variable. • May be confused with Tawny Emperors. Hackberry Emperors have a black dorsal forewing tip scattered with white spots that Tawny Emperors lack. Two forewing eyespots are present that are absent on Tawnies. There are three black forewing bars on Hackberry Emperor dorsal forewings; Tawnies have only two. Ventrally, Hackberry Emperors are typically much more patterned than Tawny Emperors. Their hindwing eyespots tend to be more noticeable and distinct than those of Tawny Emperors. Alabama Butterfly Atlas | alabama.butterflyatlas.org Hackberry Emperor Dorsal Male Wings more pointed than female’s Black forewing tip with irregular pattern small white spots* Three dark bars at base One black eyespot* Hindwing submarginal row of dark spots surrounded with pale yellow Hackberry Emperor (Asterocampa celtis) © Sara Bright * Reliable diagnostic marker Wingspan: 1¼ - 2½ inches (3.5 - 6.3 cm) Alabama Butterfly Atlas | alabama.butterflyatlas.org Hackberry Emperor Dorsal Female Wings