385 Pleasant Traffic MR01 Final

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

385 Pleasant Traffic MR01 Final Traffic Impact & Access Study Watertown, Massachusetts Main Street WATERTOWN 20 Acton Street Roseland Road Jensen Road Waltham Street SITE Pleasant Street Bridge Street Bridge California Street Chapel Street NEWTON North Scale: Not to Scale Study Locations Figure 1 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. MDM Planners & Engineers Site Location Date: December 2016 Dwg No. 903 TIAS.dwg Copyright © by MDM Transportation Consultants, Inc. All rights reserved. □ Adequate Roadway Capacity & Operations. Under future No-Build conditions, the signalized intersections of Pleasant Street at Bridge Street and Rosedale Street will operate at an overall LOS C or better and LOS B or better during the peak hours, respectively. The overall increase in delay with the project in place under Build conditions will be nominal and the intersection will continue to operate with only minor changes between No-Build and Build conditions. Likewise, the central site driveway will be an exit-only driveway and will operate at LOS D or better during the peak hours with the development in place. In summary, MDM finds that incremental traffic associated with the proposed development is not expected to materially impact operating conditions at the study intersections and ample roadway capacity will be available to support the project. Proposed access/egress improvements will minimize disruption of traffic along Pleasant Street by concentrating egress movements to a central Site location that will not be influenced by queues from nearby signals. Implementation of proposed pedestrian and bicycle improvements along with a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program as outlined in this study will establish a framework of minimizing Site traffic impacts by encouraging non-motorized travel modes and pedestrian/bicycle accommodation that is compatible with other projects along the Pleasant Street corridor. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project Site is located at 385 Pleasant Street in Watertown, Massachusetts. The site consists of a two-story warehouse (16,100± sf) which was formerly occupied by The Field Companies and the Site is currently being used for outdoor storage of Ford vehicles. Three access driveways along Pleasant Street provide access to the warehouse and nearby parking lots. Under proposed conditions, the site will be redeveloped into a mixed-use space providing 58 residential units as well as commercial space in a total of 5 buildings including the renovation of the existing warehouse. The commercial space will include 8,000± gross square feet (gsf) of commercial space in the first floor of the renovated warehouse building and 6,785± gsf of office space in the proposed office building. Access to the Site is proposed via the two entrance driveways on Pleasant Street; the first entrance located on the western side of the site and the second location in the eastern side of the site to the east of the townhomes. The driveways are proposed to be one-way with a single egress onto Pleasant Street. On-site parking is proposed for 93± vehicles to support the mixed-use residential/commercial buildings. The project will also include 32± indoor secure bike parking spaces to support the residential use. The preliminary site layout is presented in Figure 2. 2 MDM G:\Projects\903 - Watertown (385 Pleasant)\Documents\903 MR01_Final.doc STUDY METHODOLOGY This traffic impact assessment is conducted in general conformance with industry standard traffic study guidelines. The first step documents existing conditions in the transportation study area, including an inventory of roadway geometry, observed traffic volumes and safety characteristics. Next, future year traffic conditions are forecast that account for other planned area developments, normal area growth, and development-related traffic increases. The third step quantifies operating characteristics of study intersections. Specific attention is given to the incremental impacts of the proposed development. Finally, improvements are described that address specific development-related operational needs as required. STUDY AREA This TIA evaluates transportation characteristics of roadways and intersections that provide a primary means of access to the site, and that are likely to sustain a measurable level of traffic impact from the development. The study area includes the following intersections and identified in Figure 1: □ Pleasant Street at Bridge Street (Signalized) □ Pleasant Street at Rosedale Street (Signalized) □ Pleasant Street at Site Driveways (Unsignalized) EXISTING TRAFFIC & SAFETY CHARATERISTICS An overview of roadway classification and geometric characteristics is provided below for study roadways and intersections. Roadways Pleasant Street Pleasant Street is generally an east-west roadway classified by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) as an Urban Minor Arterial roadway and is under the local (Town) jurisdiction. Pleasant Street connects Route 20 to the east with River Street to the west. In the project area, the roadway provides one travel lane in the eastbound and westbound directions with sidewalks provided on both the northern and southern sides of the roadway. Street lighting is provided along Pleasant Street within the immediate project area. Land uses along Pleasant Street includes a mix of land uses including but not limited to Exergen Corporation, a pet resort and hospital, retail shops, and auto dealerships and service centers. 3 MDM G:\Projects\903 - Watertown (385 Pleasant)\Documents\903 MR01_Final.doc Bridge Street Bridge Street is a north-south roadway under local (Town) jurisdiction and is classified as an Urban Collector roadway by the MassDOT. Bridge Street provides a connection between Watertown Street to the south and Buck Street to the north. Bridge Street provides one lane of travel in each direction with additional turn lanes provided at its major intersections. Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the roadway. Street lighting is provided along Bridge Street in the project area. Land uses include a mix of commercial activity and residential uses, which includes an office building, a car wash, a Tesla Service Center, an automobile dealership (Toyota of Watertown), and Olympic Storage. Rosedale Street Rosedale Street is generally a north-south roadway under local (Town) jurisdiction and is classified as a Local roadway by the MassDOT. Rosedale Street provides a connection between Pleasant Street to the south and Main Street (Route 20) to the north. Rosedale Street provides one lane of travel in each direction with sidewalks provided along both the eastern and western sides of the roadway. Street lighting is provided along Rosedale Street in the project area. Land uses include a mix of commercial activity, which includes a Central Rock Gym, office space, automobile repair center, and Plumbing Museum. Residential uses are also located along the northern section of Rosedale Street. Intersections Pleasant Street at Bridge Street Pleasant Street meets Bridge Street to form a 4-way signalized intersection. The Pleasant Street eastbound approach provides a shared left/through travel lane and an exclusive right turn lane and the Pleasant Street westbound approach provides an exclusive left turn lane and a shared through/ right turn lane. The Bridge Street northbound approach operates as an exclusive left turn lane, a through travel lane and an exclusive right turn lane and the Bridge Street southbound approach operates as a shared left/through travel lane and an exclusive right turn lane. The traffic signal operates with advance phases for the westbound and northbound travel directions and an exclusive pedestrian phase actuated by push button. Land uses at the intersection consist of Tesla Auto Body Service Center, Toyota of Watertown, Riverworks at Aetna Mills, and Perfection Car Wash. 4 MDM G:\Projects\903 - Watertown (385 Pleasant)\Documents\903 MR01_Final.doc Pleasant Street at Rosedale Road/304 Pleasant St. Driveway Pleasant Street meets Rosedale Road and the 304 Pleasant St. Driveway to form a 4-way signalized intersection. The 304 Pleasant Street northbound and Rosedale Road southbound approaches both provide single multi-purpose travel lanes. The Pleasant Street eastbound approach provides an exclusive left-turn lane and a separate through/right travel lane, while the Pleasant Street westbound approach provides a single shared travel lane with a gored out left turn area. The traffic signal operates with advance phases for the eastbound travel direction, split phasing for the northbound and southbound approaches and an exclusive pedestrian phase that is push button actuated. Land uses at the intersection consist of AWE Engineering, Felicitex Therapeutics, and Biomodels Pharmaceuticals. Baseline Traffic Data Peak Hour Traffic Traffic volume data was collected in December 2016 during the weekday morning (7:00 – 9:00 AM) and weekday evening (4:00 – 6:00 PM) peak periods. Review of MassDOT permanent count station data indicates that December is a below average traffic month (approximately 5 percent below average month conditions). Thus, the traffic counts were adjusted by 5% (increase) to represent average conditions. The resulting Baseline weekday morning and weekday evening peak-hour traffic volumes for the study intersections are depicted in Figure 3 and Figure 4. Turning movement counts and permanent count station data are provided in the Attachments. Daily Traffic Counts Daily traffic volumes along Pleasant Street between Bridge Street and Rosedale Street were
Recommended publications
  • CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT
    CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT The 2003 PMT outlined the actions needed to bring the MBTA transit system into a state of good repair (SGR). It evaluated and prioritized a number of specific enhancement and expansion projects proposed to improve the system and better serve the regional mobility needs of Commonwealth residents. In the inter- vening years, the MBTA has funded and implemented many of the 2003 PMT priorities. The transit improvements highlighted in this chapter have been accomplished in spite of the unsus- tainable condition of the Authority’s present financial structure. A 2009 report issued by the MBTA Advisory Board1 effectively summarized the Authority’s financial dilemma: For the past several years the MBTA has only balanced its budgets by restructuring debt liquidat- ing cash reserves, selling land, and other one-time actions. Today, with credit markets frozen, cash reserves depleted and the real estate market at a stand still, the MBTA has used up these options. This recession has laid bare the fact that the MBTA is mired in a structural, on-going deficit that threatens its viability. In 2000 the MBTA was re-born with the passage of the Forward Funding legislation.This legislation dedicated 20% of all sales taxes collected state-wide to the MBTA. It also transferred over $3.3 billion in Commonwealth debt from the State’s books to the T’s books. In essence, the MBTA was born broke. Throughout the 1990’s the Massachusetts sales tax grew at an average of 6.5% per year. This decade the sales tax has barely averaged 1% annual growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Report
    July 24, 2015 Matthew A. Beaton, Secretary Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs Attention: MEPA Office – Holly Johnson, MEPA #14590 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 RE: The Station at Riverside, MEPA #14590 Dear Secretary Beaton: The Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) regularly reviews proposals deemed to have regional impacts. The Council reviews proposed projects for consistency with MetroFuture, the regional policy plan for the Boston metropolitan area, the Commonwealth’s Sustainable Development Principles, the GreenDOT initiative, consistency with Complete Streets policies and design approaches, as well as impacts on the environment. BH Normandy Riverside, the Proponent, proposes to redevelop an MBTA property at Riverside Station on Grove Street in Newton, off Exit 22 of Interstate 95 (Route 128). Since the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) filing in 2011, the proposed project has been downsized, but still is a significant development project in Greater Boston. The current proposal is for a mixed-use redevelopment in and around the current parking lot for the MBTA’s Riverside Station, the western terminus of the MBTA Green Line "D" Branch light rail line. The project site is defined as the 22.35 acres owned by the MBTA, which currently consists of the MBTA rail yard operations, a Green Line maintenance facility, a bus terminal facility, and surface parking. A 9.38-acre parcel will be leased to the Proponent for redevelopment. An Intermodal Commuter Facility (ICF) will be constructed on approximately 2.11 acres and will be operated by the MBTA. The MBTA will continue its operations on the remaining approximately 10.86 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal and Management Control Board Transportation Board Room June 25, 2018 12:30 P.M
    MBTA Logo, Charles D. Baker, Governor, Karyn E. Polito, Lieutenant Governor, Stephanie Pollack, MassDOT Secretary & CEO, Luis Manuel Ramírez, General Manager & CEO, MassDOT logo Fiscal and Management Control Board Transportation Board Room June 25, 2018 12:30 p.m. MEETING MINUTES Present: Director Steven Poftak, Director Brian Lang and Director Monica Tibbits-Nutt Quorum Present: Yes Others Present: Secretary Stephanie Pollack, MassDOT Director Joe Sullivan (departed at 1:34 p.m.) Luis Ramirez, Jeffrey Gonneville, Marie Breen, Owen Kane, Mike Abramo, Nathan Peyton, David Abdoo, Jackie Goddard, Evan Rowe, Scott Hamwey, Jessica Casey, Beth Larkin, Heather Hume, Laurel Paget-Seekins, Kat Benesh, Dan Grabauskus and David Scorey At the call of Vice Chair Poftak, a meeting of the Fiscal and Management Control Board (Board) was called to order at 12:36 p.m. at the State Transportation Building, Transportation Board Room, 10 Park Plaza, Boston, Massachusetts. Vice Chair Poftak opened up the public comment period for items appearing on the agenda. The first speaker Richard Prone, MBTA’s Duxbury Advisory Board Representative, commented on the addition of commuter rail evening trains. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Ten Park Plaza, Suite 4510, Boston, MA 02116 www.mbta.com Next, Louise Baxter, from TRU, read testimony of behalf of the TRU, relative to AFC 2.0 and the Better Bus project. Lastly, Marilyn McNabb commented on the Ride’s transition to Transdev. Next, was the approval of the meeting minutes of June 11, 2018. On motion duly made and seconded, it was: VOTED: to approve the minutes of June 11, 2018. Director Tibbits-Nutt abstained from voting.
    [Show full text]
  • Citi Frozen Fenway 2014 Faqs WHAT FANS NEED to KNOW
    Citi Frozen Fenway 2014 FAQs WHAT FANS NEED TO KNOW What time will gates open for games on Dec 28, 31; Jan. 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, and 11? Fenway Park gates will open one hour prior to the start of the games. December 28: gates will open at 5:30 p.m. December 31: gates will open at 9:15 a.m. January 2: gates will open at 2:30 p.m. January 4: gates will open at 3:00 p.m. January 7: gates will open at 3:00 p.m. January 8: gates will open at 12:30 p.m. January 9: gates will open at 6:30 p.m. January 11: gates will open at 2:00 p.m. What time will gates open on the two Community Skating and Sledding days on December 29 and January 1? Fenway Park gates will open at 8:30 a.m., a half hour before the first Community Skating and Sledding time. Patrons with tickets to one of the Community Skating and Sledding days are asked to arrive 30 minutes before their scheduled time. Session times are indicated on all tickets. What time will gates open for New Year’s Eve at Fenway Park on December 31? Gate E will open at 4:30 p.m., a half hour before the first New Year’s Eve skating time. Patrons with tickets to one of the New Year’s Eve skating sessions may enter anytime after 4:30 p.m. Designated skating sessions are indicated on all tickets. Will ice skates be provided at the ballpark for the community skating days and New Year’s Eve event? Skates will not be provided at Fenway Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Better T in the Era of Covid-19
    Building a Better T in the Era of Covid-19 MBTA Advisory Board September 17, 2020 General Manager Steve Poftak 1 Agenda 1. Capital Project Updates 2. Ridership Update 3. Ride Safer 4. Crowding 5. Current Service and Service Planning 2 Capital Project Updates 3 Surges Complete | May – August 2020 Leveraged low ridership while restrictions are in place due to COVID-19 directives May June July August D Branch (Riverside to Kenmore) Two 9-Day Closures C Branch (Cleveland Circle to Kenmore) E Branch (Heath to Symphony) Track & Signal Improvements, Fenway Portal Flood 28-Day Full Closure 28-Day Full Closure Protection, Brookline Hills TOD Track & Intersection Upgrades Track & Intersection Upgrades D 6/6 – 6/14 D 6/20 – 6/28 C 7/5 – 8/1 E 8/2 – 8/29 Blue Line (Airport to Bowdoin) Red Line (Braintree to Quincy) 14-Day Closure Harbor Tunnel Infrastructure Upgrades On-call Track 2, South Shore Garages, Track Modernization BL 5/18 – 5/31 RL 6/18 -7/1 4 Shuttle buses replaced service Ridership Update 5 Weekday Ridership by Line and Mode - Indexed to Week of 2/24 3/17: Restaurants and 110 bars closed, gatherings Baseline: limited to 25 people Average weekday from 2/24-2/28 100 MBTA service reduced Sources: 90 3/24: Non-essential Faregate counts for businesses closed subway lines, APC for 80 buses, manual counts at terminals for Commuter Rail, RIDE 70 vendor reports 6/22: Phase 2.2 – MBTA 6/8: Phase 2.1 60 increases service Notes: Recent data preliminary 50 5/18-6/1: Blue Line closed for 40 accelerated construction Estimated % of baseline ridership
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Capacity Evaluation
    Riverside Redevelopment - Transportation Impact and Access Study (TIAS) Revised 2020-02-13 Transit Capacity Evaluation Because the project site will be integrated with the existing transit station, public transit plays an important role in how people will get to and from the site. As such, an in-depth analysis of the existing transit system and its ability to accommodate future passenger demands was prepared. This section contains the following information: › Methodolgy › Existing MBTA Green (D) Line Capacity o Planned MBTA Green Line (D) Improvements › Existing MBTA Bus Service Capacity › Current and Future Transit Operations › Projected Ridership and Distribution of Project Generated Transit Trips › Future Transit Service Capacity Analysis Methodolgy In an effort to understand the potential for additional ridership, available capacity was estimated on transit lines that could be utilized for access to and from the site. For this study, the MBTA Green Line rapid transit (subway) line and the MBTA Route 558 bus service were evaluated for project impacts on passenger capacity. The capacity analysis results in a comparison of the expected demand for transit to the planned capacity of the service. Thus, for the subway and bus lines, we first identify the service segments that are expected to be used by riders generated by the proposed development project. For each service, we identify the peak passenger load point – the service segment that is most crowded, based on existing ridership, by time of day (for buses it’s by trip; for subway, it’s by 30-minute service period). These passenger loads are compared against the service’s capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Soft Landing & Living
    GUIDE TO SOFT LANDING & LIVING Babson’s Unofficial Guide for International Students and Partners 2021-2022 Edition INTRODUCTION - - - - - - - - We welcome you to the Babson family. This new stage in your life will be very exciting. But we also know uprooting your life is pretty disruptive and settling somewhere new can be very overwhelming and stressful. We understand, we have walked down that lane. We are here to help. This is why we have gathered information from the experience of other international students and partners, as well as locals, to help you plan and transition to your new life in Boston and at Babson. We have also shared some tips and recommendations to make your life easier and fun while you are here. 2 This guide was started by alumni Peter Rovick (MBA ‘09), was updated by grad partner Erica Jornales (Partner of MBA ’19), and has been updated ever since by grad students and partners. This year we have been working on including information that will speak to single students, to couples, and to families, as we know your needs in some cases might be different. We hope you find this guide helpful and in the future help keep it up to date for other generations. If you have a thought or advice to share please send it to [email protected]. Disclaimer: This document is not officially endorsed by Babson College. “ Change is hard at first, messy in the middle and gorgeous at the end. -Robin Sharma ” 3 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 BEFORE YOU TRAVEL AND FIRST DAYS ....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Green Line Extension Project EEA #13886
    Draft Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Statement Green Line Extension Project EEA #13886 Volume 1 | Text October 2009 Executive Office of Transportation and Public Works U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (DEIR/EA) AND DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION FOR THE GREEN LINE EXTENSION PROJECT CAMBRIDGE, SOMERVILLE, MEDFORD, MASSACHUSETTS STATE PROJECT NO. 13886 Prepared Pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23, Part 771, Section 119 (23 CFR 771.119); 49 U.S.C. Section 303 [formerly Department of Transportation Act of 1966, Section 4(f)] and the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act M.G.L. CH 30 Sec. 61 through 62H by the FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and the COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS (EOT) Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Green Line Extension Project Assessment and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations Secretary’s Certificate on the EENF Executive Summary 1 Introduction and Background .......................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Project Summary .................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3
    [Show full text]
  • MBTA Tariff and Statement of Fare and Transfer Rules
    MBTA Tariff and Statement of Fare and Transfer Rules Adopted by the Fiscal and Management Control Board June 6, 2016 Effective July 1, 2016 Revised June 15, 2018 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 MBTA Fare Media ...................................................................................................................... 3 CharlieCard ............................................................................................................................ 3 CharlieTicket .......................................................................................................................... 5 Paper Tickets ......................................................................................................................... 6 Cash ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Commuter Checks and benefit cards ...................................................................................... 7 mTicket ................................................................................................................................... 7 MBTA Fare Vending and Validation ........................................................................................... 8 Fare Vending Machines .......................................................................................................... 8 On-board Fareboxes .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Green Line Flood Protection Project
    LOWELL LINE HAVERHILL LINE NEWBURYPORT/ OL ROCKPORT LINE Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority OAK GROVE Lynn Rapid Transit/Key Bus Routes Map West Woodlawn Medford 116 Malden Center BL 111 WONDERLAND RL Wellington Revere Center ALEWIFE 117 Arlington Chelsea Revere Heights 77 Assembly Beach Davis Bellingham Beachmont 77 Sullivan Sq Sq Waltham Waverley Belmont Community Suffolk Downs Porter College FITCHBURG LINE 116 Orient Heights 73 GL Charlestown 117 Harvard LECHMERE Navy Yard 71 73 E 71 Wood Island Watertown IN N Sq Science Park/West End E E Union Sq R 1 H Airport A Watertown (Allston) R Yard 57 66 B North Station 111 O R Central E 57 WORCESTER LINE , Harvard Ave Long C Maverick Wharf F SL1 E Griggs St Packards Corner BOWDOIN North R R Rental Kendall/MIT Y Car Center Allston St Babcock St 1 BL Haymarket C, E Warren St Pleasant St Gov’t. Newtonville Aquarium Washington St St. Paul St r Charles/ Center AIRPORT Boston Landing E TERMINALS Sutherland Rd BU West MGH Long Wharf Logan C, D, (Central) Ferry Kent St Concourse Chiswick Rd BU Central Park St State Terminal St. Paul St Logan Chestnut Hill Ave BU East E Rowes International Coolidge Corner Hawes St Wharf r Airport South St Blandford St Copley B, C, D, Hynes Convention Ct Downtown St. Marys St e Way Summit Ave SL5 Crossing BOSTON Trade Ct Brandon Hall Kenmore e COLLEGE Av 5 5 L Fenway 39 L SL5 South CourthousWorldSilver Line S Fairbanks St S GL B *Boylston Station Longwood Arlington SL5 SL4 SL1 & SL2 Washington Sq Prudential Brookline Village SL4 & Chinatown Harbor St 23 Drydock Tappan St Tufts HULL Green Line Flood Tide St F Brookline Hills Medical ERR Dean Rd Symphony 39 HINGHAM FER Y Center 88 Black Englewood Ave Beaconsfield Northeastern SL4 DESIGN Falcon Ave RY Reservoir Museum of Fine Arts CENTER ProtectionCLEVELAND Project Herald St SL2 Back Bay CIRCLE Chestnut Hill Longwood Medical Area 39 East Berkeley St Brigham Circle Broadway GL C Newton Centre Fenwood Rd Mass.
    [Show full text]
  • MBTA Transit Asset Management Plan Massachusetts Bay
    The following document was created by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). This document file may not be fully accessible. If you would like to request this file in a different format, please contact the Central Transportation Planning Staff (CTPS) via email at [email protected]. CTPS will coordinate your request with the MBTA. SEPTEMBER 2018 MBTA Transit Asset Management Plan Massachusetts Bay Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Transportation Authority MBTA TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank PAGE 4 OF 143 MBTA TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 MBTA Background ................................................................................................................................. 15 Scope of Transit Asset Management Plan ...................................................................................... 16 Objectives .................................................................................................................................................. 17 Accountable Executive and Strategic Alignment ........................................................................ 18 Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Market Analysis Briefing Book
    Rhode Island DRAFT Transit Master Plan MARKET ANALYSIS 2018 Table of Contents Introduction ..............................................................1 Underlying Local ...................................................3 Transit Demand Travel Patterns......................................................20 Commuter Service .........................................29 Demand Projections for 2040 ....................................38 Summary ..........................................................45 Chapter One | Introduction Introduction What is the Rhode Island Transit Master Plan? The purpose of the Rhode Island Transit Master Plan (RI TMP) is to increase transit’s role in Rhode Island’s transportation system by making service more attractive and to expand its reach to new areas, both within and outside of the state. The TMP will approach these goals through four comprehensive elements: • Develop a transit vision for Rhode Island over the next two decades • Identify the specific improvements that should be implemented to achieve the vision • Identify potential new sources of funding for the improvements • Identify governance changes that could facilitate implementation and improve service delivery About the Market Analysis The foundation of understanding how to best serve an area with transit is to understand the underlying market and demand for different kinds and levels of service. This market analysis examines: 1. The underlying demand for transit services throughout the state of Rhode Island and across its borders 2. Where people
    [Show full text]