The Adoremus Hymnal I Was Intrigued by the Essay-Length Review of Our Hymnal by Father Anthony Ruff, O.S.B
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
-m m VA ^ fcV /at*. - •-•". c Lv i &&-. -, • \ ummer) £ 1998 - • rolume 125 St. Mary's Cathedral, Lansing, MI SACRED MUSIC Volume 125, Number 2, Summer 1998 FROM THE EDITORS 3 "Musica Sacra" A New Liturgical Movement Ten Years of the Motu Proprio "Ecclesia Dei" REFLECTIONS ON CATHOLIC CHURCH MUSIC 8 Michael B. Hoerig VESPERS AND VIRGINS: PART I 13 Duane L.C.M. Galles OPEN LETTER TO ANTIPHON 19 Kurt R. Poterack REVIEWS 23 OPEN FORUM 26 NEWS 30 CONTRIBUTORS 32 SACRED MUSIC Continuation of Caecilia, published by the Society of St. Caecilia since 1874, and The Catholic Choirmaster, published by the Society of St. Gregory of America since 1915. Published quarterly by the Church Music Association of America. Office of Publication: 875 Malta N.E., Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503-1835. Editorial Board: Kurt Poterack, Ph.D., Editor Rev. Ralph S. March, S.O. Cist. Rev. John Buchanan Harold Hughesdon William P. Mahrt Virginia A. Schubert Cal Stepan Rev. Richard M. Hogan Mary Ellen Strapp News: Rev. Msgr. Richard J. Schuler 548 Lafond Avenue, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55103 Music for Review: Paul Salamunovich, 10828 Valley Spring Lane, N. Hollywood, Calif. 91602 Paul Manz, 1700 E. 56th St., Chicago, Illinois 60637 Membership, Circulation and Advertising: 548 Lafond Avenue, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55103 CHURCH MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA Officers and Board of Directors President Father Robert Skeris Vice-President Father Robert Pasley General Secretary Amy Guettler Treasurer Susan Treacy Directors Rev. Ralph S. March, S.O. Cist. Mrs. Donald G. Vellek William P. Mahrt Rev. Robert A. Skeris Members in the Church Music Association of America includes a sub- scription to SACRED MUSIC. Membership is $20 annually; student membership is $10.00 annually. Single copies are $5.00. Send applica- tions and changes of address to SACRED MUSIC, 548 Lafond Avenue, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55103-1672. Make checks payable to Church Music Association of America. Library of Congress catalog card number: 62-6712/MN SACRED MUSIC is indexed in the Catholic Periodical and Literature Index, Music Index, Music Article Guide, and Arts and Humanities Index. Cover: Window, Church of Saint Agnes, Saint Paul, Minnesota. Photo by Joe Oden. Copyright by Church Music Association of America. 1998. ISSN: 0036-2255 SACRED MUSIC (ISSN 0036-2255) is published quarterly for $20 per year by the Church Music Association of America, 875 Malta N.E., Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503-1835. Periodicals postage paid at Saint Paul, Minnesota. Postmaster: Send address changes to SACRED MUSIC, 548 Lafond Avenue, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55103-1672. St. Isidore's, Grand Rapids, MI FROM THE EDITORS Musica Sacra As I begin my editorial tenure, I think it is important to reaffirm this journal's com- mitment to the Church's official theology of sacred music. It is the main task of Sacred Music to promote sacred music. This official theology of sacred music (which we some- times identify by its Latin title "musica sacra") received its first expression in Pius X's motu proprio of 1903 and was fully confirmed in Chapter VI of Vatican II's Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy. Very simply put, the theology of "musica sacra" holds that the purpose of sacred music is the glorification of God and the sanctification of man; the func- tion of sacred music is to serve the liturgy; the nature of sacred music is that it is an inte- gral part of the solemn liturgy, and the qualities of sacred music are holiness, artistry, and universality. All of this can be found in article 112 of the liturgy constitution; yet few Catholic church musicians know this. There are various reasons for this widespread ig- norance, many of which have been and will be discussed in the pages of this journal, but we have much work ahead of us. Now for some practical matters. For now, any correspondence relating to membership should continue to be sent to the St. Paul address. Any letters to the editor or proposed articles should be sent to me at 875 Malta N.E., Grand Rapids, MI 49503 or to my E-mail address, which is [email protected]. If you wish to send me a computer file of your proposed article, I can read both IBM and Mac formats. Either way it would be safest to save your file as a "rich texture format" (.rtm) and send it to me that way. Kurt Poterack, Ph.D. FROM THE EDITORS A New Liturgical Movement We are definitely seeing the beginning of that "new liturgical movement" which Cardinal Ratzinger has called for. There are some hopeful signs: a number of organiza- tions and publications have formed recently calling for an authentic reform of the litur- gy in the light of tradition; and the liturgy club is beginning to lose the nearly exclusive grip it has had on the liturgy for the past thirty years. But this hopeful development is in its early stages — very early stages. Much damage has been done. Many ordinary Catholics now see the liturgy as, to one degree or another, man-centered or man-con- trolled. There is a slight difference. "Man-centered" means almost quite literally wor- ship of man. An example would be the talk-show host priest, or Thomas Day's "Father Histrionicus," or simply the emphasis placed on the "assembly" and its need for various forms of self-expression or accommodation in the liturgy. I well remember my eighth- grade graduation Mass in which the congregation was treated to a slide show after com- munion showing us in our various activities that year to the accompaniment of Jim Croce's song Time in a Bottle. This could be seen as sacrilegious or dismissed as merely goofy. A more subtle threat, however, is the "man-controlled" view according to which the liturgy needs to be altered and restructured every so often. The motivation may be sin- cere and may even co-exist with a fundamentally "God-centered" outlook, but ulti- mately this view lacks a true catholic sense of tradition and of the liturgical rites as liv- ing realities. This is where the liturgical movement strayed, when it became interested largely in "fabricating texts and inventing actions and forms...[rather than]...with redis- covering the living center, of penetrating what is in reality the liturgical tissue, in order that the renewal of the liturgy should issue forth from its own very substance." These sentiments of Cardinal Ratzinger can be illustrated by looking at what hap- pened to the concession the Council made to the use of the vernacular. One could make the case that the use of the vernacular in the liturgy was a pastoral concession to allow the simple faithful to enter more easily into the substance — the prayers — of the Roman Rite. But at least as early as May of 1964 that eminence grise of the liturgy club, Father Frederick McManus, was saying in print that not only should translations avoid being "slavishly literal," but that "the proper evolution...of the Roman or other rites demands that new expressions and forms of prayer be composed and created." So, far from help- ing the simple faithful to enter into the substance of the Roman (or any other) Rite, Father McManus saw the vernacular as part and parcel of an attempt to change the sub- stance of the Roman Rite. Remember that this was seven months before the actual in- troduction of the vernacular into the liturgy in America! There are disagreements among those of us who constitute this "new liturgical move- ment." As I see it there are roughly three factions in this movement which are repre- sented by the publications The Latin Mass, Adoremus Bulletin, and Antiphon. The dis- agreements are not unimportant but my plea is that we not forget what we have in com- mon, something which I have alluded to above. This could be summed up in the state- ment of Owen Chadwick that "(l)iturgies are not made, they grow in the devotion of centuries." Let me step aside and let Cardinal Ratzinger speak on this issue. Although addressed to supporters of the Tridentine Mass, this speech, given on October 24th in Rome, is relevant to all involved in the "new liturgical movement." K.P. Ten Years of the Motu Proprio Ecclesia Dei Ten years after the publication of the motu proprio Ecclesia Dei, what sort of balance- sheet can one draw-up? I think this is above all an occasion to show our gratitude and FROM THE EDITORS to give thanks. The divers communities that were born thanks to this pontifical text have given the church a great number of priestly and religious vocations who, zealously, joy- fully, and deeply united with the Pope, have given their service to the Gospel in our pre- sent era of history. Through them, many of the faithful have been confirmed in the joy of being able to live the liturgy, and confirmed in their love for the Church, or perhaps they have rediscovered both. In many dioceses — and their number is not so small! — they serve the Church in collaboration with the Bishops and in fraternal union with those faithful who do feel at home with the renewed form of the new liturgy. All this can- not but move us to gratitude today! However, it would not be realistic if we were to pass-over in silence those things which are less good. In many places difficulties persist, and these continue because some bishops, priests, and faithful consider this attachment to the old liturgy as an element of division which only disturbs the ecclesial community and which gives rise to suspicions regarding an acceptance of the Council made "with reservations", and more generally concerning obedience towards the legitimate pastors of the Church.