DOCSLIB.ORG

Curriculum Vitae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Curriculum Vitae List of Publications Elisa Aaltola Peer-reviewed Publications: 1. Aaltola, Elisa (2019). “Animal Love: Iris Murdoch and Simone Weil”. In Adrienne Martin (ed.) Routledge Handbook on Love. London: Routledge. 2. Aaltola, Elisa (2019). “Confronting suffering with narrative theory, constructed selfhood, and control: Critical perspectives by Simone Weil and Buddhist metaphysics”. Journal of Disability and Religion 23 (3): 227-250. 3. Aaltola, Elisa (2018). “Philosophical Narratives of Suffering: Nietzsche, Levinas, Weil and Their Cultural Roots”. Suomen Antropologi 43 (3). 4. Aaltola, Elisa (2018). “The Lives of Animals: From Rational Language to Speaking (of) Lions”. In Tim Mehigan and Christian Moser (eds.) The Intellectual Landscape in the Works of J.M. Coetzee. London: Camden House. 5. Aaltola, Elisa (2018). ”A Critique of the Case against Empathy in Animal Ethics”. In Matsuoka Atsuko and John Sorenson (eds.) Critical Animal Studies. London: Rowman and Littlefield Int. 6. Aaltola, Elisa (2017). “Shame: From Defensive Fury to Epistemological Shifts and Political Change”. In Andrew Woodhall and Gabriel Garmendia da Trindade (eds.) Ethical and Political Approaches to Nonhuman Animal Issues. Berlin: Springer. 7. Aaltola, Elisa (2016). “The Problem of Akrasia: Moral Cultivation and Socio-Political Resistance”. In Paola Cavalieri (ed.) Philosophy and the Politics of Animal Liberation. London: Palgrave MacMillan. 8. Aaltola, Elisa (2015). “Wilderness Experiences as Ethics: From Elevation to Attentiveness”. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 18:3. 9. Aaltola, Elisa (2015). “Politico-moral Apathy and Omnivore’s Akrasia: Views from the Rationalist Tradition”. Politics and Animals, 1:1. 1 (8) 10. Aaltola, Elisa & Wahlberg, Birgitta (2015). ”Non-Human Animals: Legal Status and Moral Considerability”. Retfærd 38:4. 11. Aaltola, Elisa (2015). ”Eläimellinen moraalipsykologia: tunne, järki ja kiasmat” (”Animalistic moral psychology: Emotions, reason and chiasms”). Niin&Näin 2/15. 12. Aaltola, Elisa (2014). “Rise of Sentimentalism: Implications for Animal Philosophy”. In Elisa Aaltola & John Hadley (eds.) Animal Ethics and Philosophy: Questioning the Orthodoxy. London: Rowman & Littlefield. 13. Aaltola, Elisa (2014). “Affective Empathy as Core Moral Agency: Psychopathy, Autism and Reason Revisited”. Philosophical Explorations 17:1. 14. Aaltola, Elisa (2014). “Varieties of Empathy and Moral Agency”. Topoi – An International Review of Philosophy 33:1. 15. Aaltola, Elisa (2014). "Animal Suffering: Representations and the Act of Looking". Anthrozoös 27:1. 16. Aaltola, Elisa (2014). “Bioengineered Domestication”. In Helena Siipi & Markku Oksanen (eds.) The Ethics of Animal Recreation and Modification. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 17. Aaltola, Elisa (2013). “Skepticism, Empathy and Animal Suffering”. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10:4. 18. Aaltola, Elisa (2013). “Empathy, Intersubjectivity and Animal Ethics”. Journal of Environmental Philosophy 10:2. 19. Aaltola, Elisa (2013). “Personhood, Interaction and Skepticism”. In Markus Wild & Klaus Petrus (eds.) Animal Minds and Animal Ethics. Bielefeld: Transcript. 20. Aaltola, Elisa (2012). “Differing Philosophies: Criminalisation and the Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty Debate”. In Rune Ellefsen, Ragnhild Sollund, Guri Larsen (eds.), Eco-global Crimes: Contemporary Problems and Future Challenges. London: Ashgate. 21. Aaltola, Elisa (2011). "Green Anarchy: Deep Ecology and Primitivism". In Benjamin Franks & Matthew Wilson (eds.) Anarchism and Moral Philosophy. Palgrave MacMillan. 22. Aaltola, Elisa (2011). ”The Philosophy behind the Movement: Animal Studies vs. Animal Rights”. Society & Animals 19: 393-406. 23. Aaltola, E. (2010). "Coetzee and alternative animal ethics". In Anton Leist and Peter Singer (eds.) J.M. Coetzee and Ethics. Columbia University Press. 24. Aaltola, E. (2010). "Animal Minds, Skepticism and the Affective Stance". Teorema XXIX/2. 25. Aaltola, E. (2010). "The argument from absurdity". Environmental Values 19:1. 2 (8) 26. Aaltola, E. (2010). "The Anthropocentric Paradigm and the Possibility of Animal Ethics". Ethics and the Environment 15:1, 27-50. 27. Aaltola, Elisa (2010). “Three Standard Arguments against the Individual Value of Non-Human Animals”. Tε!λoς, Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas XVII/1, 2010. 28. Aaltola, Elisa (2008). “Personhood and Animals”. Environmental Ethics 30:2. 29. Aaltola, Elisa (2005). ”The Politics and Ethics of Animal Experimentation”. International Journal Of Biotechonology, 7:4. 30. Aaltola, Elisa (2005). “Animal Ethics and Interest Conflicts”. Ethics & the Environment, 10:1. 31. Aaltola, Elisa (2004). “The Moral Value of Animals: Three Versions Based on Altruism”. Essays in Philosophy 5:2. 32. Aaltola, Elisa (2002). “Other Animal Ethics and the Demand for Difference”. Environmental Values 11:2. 33. Aaltola, Elisa & Oksanen, Markku (2002). “Species Conservation and Minority Rights: The Case of Springtime Bird Hunting in Åland”. Environmental Values 11:4. 34. Aaltola, Elisa (2002). ”Animal Monsters and the Fear of the Wild”. M/C: Journal of Media and Culture, vol. 5. 35. Aaltola, Elisa (2001). ”Kauhuelokuvan eläinhirviöt: konstruktiivinen analyysi” (”Horror and the construction of animality”). Lähikuva, no. 3. 36. Aaltola, Elisa (2000). ”Luontodokumentti ja luonnon representaatio” (”Nature documentary and the representation of nature”). Lähikuva, no. 4. 37. Aaltola, Elisa & Oksanen, Markku (2000). ”Lajiensuojelu ja vähemmistöoikeudet: esimerkkinä Kevätlinnustus Ahvenanmaalla” (”Species conservation and minority rights in Åland”). Oikeus 1. 38. Aaltola, Elisa (2000). ”Bambisyndrooma? Eläinhahmojen merkitys eläinkuvan rakentajina” (”Bambi-Syndrome? The role of fictional animals in the construction of animal imagery”). Kulttuurintutkimus, no.1. 3 (8) Academic Books: 1. Aaltola, Elisa (2019). Häpeä ja rakkaus: ihmiseläinluonto. Helsinki: Into. 2. Aaltola, Elisa (2018). Varieties of Empathy: Moral Psychology and Animal Ethics. London: Rowman & Littlefield Int. 3. Aaltola, Elisa & Sami Keto (2017). Empatia – Myötäelämisen tiede. Helsinki: Into. 4. Aaltola, Elisa & Sami Keto (eds.) (2015). Eläimet yhteiskunnassa (”Animals in Society”). Helsinki: Into. 5. Aaltola, Elisa & John Hadley (eds.) (2014). Animal Ethics and Philosophy: Questioning the Orthodoxy. London: Rowman & Littlefield Int. 6. Aaltola, Elisa (ed.) (2013). Johdatus eläinfilosofiaan (“Introduction to Animal Philosophy”). Helsinki: Gaudeamus. 7. Aaltola, Elisa (2012). Animal Suffering: Philosophy and Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 8. Aaltola, Elisa (2006). Animal Individuality: Cultural and Moral Categorisations. Reports from the Department of Philosophy vol. 17, University of Turku. 9. Aaltola, Elisa (2004). Eläinten moraalinen arvo (”The Moral Status of Animals”). Tampere: Vastapaino. ---- 10. Revision and edition of, and substantial additions to, the Finnish translation of Animal Liberation by Peter Singer, 2007 (Helsinki: Animalia). Non- Peer-reviewed Academic Publications: 1. Aaltola, Elisa (2018). ”Forssan teurastamokohu ja ristiriitojen eläinkuva”. Eläimiksi - Kriittisen eläintutkimuksen näkökulmia 19.12.2018. 2. Aaltola, Elisa (2017). ”Tappava, rakastava eläinkuva”. Granta – Uuden kirjallisuuden areena (8). Otava. 4 (8) 3. Aaltola, Elisa (2015). “Moraalipsykologia ja itsepetos” (”Moral psychology and denial”). In Elisa Aaltola & Sami Keto (eds.). Eläimet yhteiskunnassa. Helsinki: Into. 4. Aaltola, Elisa (2015). “Ineffability, language and animals”. In Laura Gustafsson & Terike Haapoja (eds.). The History of Cattle. Helsinki: Into. 5. Aaltola, Elisa (2014). ”Empatian eri muodot ja moraali” (”Varieties of empathy and ethics”). Tutkiva Sosiaalityö 2014. 6. Aaltola, Elisa (2014). “Empatia ja moraalinen toimijuus” (”Empathy and moral agency”). In Mikko Saastamoinen & Pekka Kuusela (eds.) Hyvän elämän sosiaalipsykologia. Kuopio: Unipress. 7. Aaltola, Elisa (2014). “Animal Sentience and the Concept of Suffering”. Arianna Ferrari & Klaus Petrus (eds.) Lexikon der Mensch/Tier-Beziehungen. Bielefeld: Transcript (in press). 8. Aaltola, Elisa (2013). “Ihminen, eläin vai molemmat?”. In Elisa Aaltola (ed.) Johdatus eläinfilosofiaan. Helsinki: Gaudeamus. 9. Aaltola, Elisa (2013). “Tom Tyler’s Ciferae”. Environmental Values 22:5. 10. Aaltola, Elisa (2013). “Kari Weil and Thinking Animals”. Journal of Animal Ethics. 11. Aaltola, Elisa (2013). “Jessica Pierce and The Last Walk”. Environmental Values 22:5. 12. Aaltola, Elisa (2012). “Syväekologia ja yhteiskuntamurros”. Väärinajattelija 6:1. 13. Aaltola, Elisa (2012). ”Kathy Rudy's Toward a New Animal Advocacy”. Times Higher Education 13/10/2011. 14. Aaltola, Elisa (2010). “Jean Kazez and Animalkind”. Times Higher Education 15/04/10]. 15. Aaltola, E. (2010). "Eläimet yhteiskunnassa" (”Animals in Society”). In Juha Räikkä (ed.) Yhteiskuntafilosofia. UNIpress. 16. Aaltola, E. (2010). "Bioteknologia ja eläimet" (”Biotechnology and Animals”). In Helena Siipi ja Marko Ahteensuu (ed.) Muuntogeenisen ruoan etiikka. UNIpress. 17. Aaltola, E. (2010). "Ihmisoikeudet" (”Human Rights”). In Pauli Niemelä (ed.) Hyvinvointipolitiikka. Helsinki: WSOY. 18. Aaltola, Elisa (2009). “Eläimet ja Etiikka” (”Animals and Ethics”), Niin&Näin 03/09. 19. Aaltola, Elisa (2009). “Andrew Linzey: Why Animal Suffering Matters”. Times Higher Education 29/10/2009. 5 (8) 20. Aaltola, Elisa (2009). “Matthew Calarco: Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida”. Environmental Values 17:1. 21. Aaltola, Elisa (2009). “Philosophy and Animal Studies: Calarco,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MAC1 Abstracts – Oral Presentations
    Oral Presentation Abstracts OP001 Rights, Interests and Moral Standing: a critical examination of dialogue between Regan and Frey. Rebekah Humphreys Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom This paper aims to assess R. G. Frey’s analysis of Leonard Nelson’s argument (that links interests to rights). Frey argues that claims that animals have rights or interests have not been established. Frey’s contentions that animals have not been shown to have rights nor interests will be discussed in turn, but the main focus will be on Frey’s claim that animals have not been shown to have interests. One way Frey analyses this latter claim is by considering H. J. McCloskey’s denial of the claim and Tom Regan’s criticism of this denial. While Frey’s position on animal interests does not depend on McCloskey’s views, he believes that a consideration of McCloskey’s views will reveal that Nelson’s argument (linking interests to rights) has not been established as sound. My discussion (of Frey’s scrutiny of Nelson’s argument) will centre only on the dialogue between Regan and Frey in respect of McCloskey’s argument. OP002 Can Special Relations Ground the Privileged Moral Status of Humans Over Animals? Robert Jones California State University, Chico, United States Much contemporary philosophical work regarding the moral considerability of nonhuman animals involves the search for some set of characteristics or properties that nonhuman animals possess sufficient for their robust membership in the sphere of things morally considerable. The most common strategy has been to identify some set of properties intrinsic to the animals themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 21, No. 2 Fall 2010 ______
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS NEWSLETTER _____________________________________________________ Volume 21, No. 2 Fall 2010 _____________________________________________________ GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ISEE Membership: ISEE membership dues are now due annually by Earth Day—22 April—of each year. Please pay your 2010-2011 dues now if you have not already done so. You can either use the form on the last page of this Newsletter to mail a check to ISEE Treasurer Marion Hourdequin, or you can use PayPal with a credit card from the membership page of the ISEE website at: <http://www.cep.unt.edu/iseememb.html>. “Old World and New World Perspectives on Environmental Philosophy,” Eighth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Environmental Ethics (ISEE), Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 14-17 June 2011: Please see the full call for abstracts and conference details in the section CONFERENCES AND CALLS below. Abstracts are due by 6 December 2010. ISEE Newsletter Going Exclusively Electronic: Starting with the Spring 2011 issue (Volume 22, no. 1), hardcopies of the ISEE Newsletter will no longer be produced and mailed to ISEE members via snail mail. ISEE members will continue to receive the Newsletter electronically as a pdf and, of course, can print their own hardcopies. New ISEE Newsletter Editor: Starting with the Spring 2011 issue, the new ISEE Newsletter Editor will be William Grove-Fanning. Please submit all ISEE Newsletter items to him at: <[email protected]>. Welcome William! ISEE Newsletter Issues: There was no 2010 Spring/Summer issue of the ISEE Newsletter. Because of the ISEE Newsletter Editor transition from Mark Woods to William Grove-Fanning, there will be no Winter 2011 issue of the ISEE Newsletter.
    [Show full text]
  • ICLA 2016 – Abstracts Group Session Panels Content Computational Comparative Literature
    ICLA 2016 – Abstracts Group Session Panels, July 17th, 2016 ICLA 2016 – Abstracts Group Session Panels Content Computational Comparative Literature. Corpus-based Methodologies ................................................. 5 16082 - Assia Djebar et la transgression des limites linguistiques, littéraires et culturelles .................. 7 16284 - Pictures for Everybody! Postcards and Literature/ Bilder für alle! Postkarten und Literatur . 11 16309 - Talking About Literature, Scientifically..................................................................................... 14 16377 - Sprache & Rache ...................................................................................................................... 16 16416 - Translational Literature - Theory, History, Perspectives .......................................................... 18 16445 - Langage scientifique, langage littéraire : quelles médiations ? ............................................... 24 16447 - PANEL Digital Humanities in Comparative Literature, World Literature(s), and Comparative Cultural Studies ..................................................................................................................................... 26 16460 - Kolonialismus, Globalisierung(en) und (Neue) Weltliteratur ................................................... 31 16499 - Science et littérature : une question de langage? ................................................................... 40 16603 - Rhizomorphe Identität? Motivgeschichte und kulturelles Gedächtnis im
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Rights and Rhetorical Topoi
    Animal Rights and Rhetorical Topoi Tero Kivinen* 1 Introduction .......................................................................................... x 2 Animal Rights ....................................................................................... x 2.1 Animal Welfare ................................................................................ x 2.2 Animal Rights .................................................................................. x 3 The Logos of Animal Rights ................................................................ x 3.1 Rhetoric ............................................................................................ x 3.2 Pisteis ............................................................................................... x 3.3 The Logos of Animal Rights ............................................................ x 4 Animal Rights and Rhetorical Topoi .................................................. x 4.1 Branches of Oratory ......................................................................... x 4.2 The Advantageous ............................................................................ x 4.2.1 Human Health ........................................................................ x 4.2.2 The Environment ................................................................... x 4.2.3 Human Rights ........................................................................ x 5 Concluding Remarks ............................................................................ x 2 Tero Kivinen:
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Rights and Animal Experiments: an Interest-Based Approach
    Alasdair Cochrane Animal rights and animal experiments: an interest-based approach Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Cochrane, Alasdair (2007) Animal rights and animal experiments: an interest-based approach. Res publica, 13 (3). pp. 293-318. DOI: 10.1007/s11158-007-9037-8 © 2007 Springer Verlag This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/21189/ Available in LSE Research Online: September 2008 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final manuscript accepted version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. Some differences between this version and the published version may remain. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Animal Rights and Animal Experiments: An Interest-Based Approach (Res Publica, Vol. 3, No. 3, Sep. 2007: 293-319. Winner of Res Publica Postgraduate Essay Prize) Alasdair Cochrane Department of Government London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Government London School of Economics and Political Science King’s Chambers Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE [email protected] 1 Animal Rights and Animal Experiments: An Interest-Based Approach1 Abstract: This paper examines whether non-human animals have a moral right not to be experimented upon.
    [Show full text]
  • Intersectionality, Radicalism, Identity, And
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Brock University Digital Repository INTERSECTIONALITY, RADICALISM, IDENTITY, AND COMMUNITY: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC CASE STUDY OF ANIMAL ACTIVIST ORGANIZING IN CANADA Mehmet Emin Boyacıoğlu Critical Sociology Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Graduate Studies, Brock University St. Catharines, Ontario © 2017 Abstract This thesis is an ethnographic case study of an animal activist organization (ACT) through an intersectional feminist theoretical lens. Qualitative data regarding ACT’s demographic constitution, internal organizational dynamics, activist strategies, ethical and political principles, and relations to other animal activists in the region have been collected through participant observations, in-depth interviews with activists, and a content analysis of social media. Data gathered and analyzed through the Grounded Theory methodology demonstrate that, despite its progressive politics in terms of gender, racialization, and class, ACT reproduced some oppressive dynamics of these, such as a normative, gendered division of labour. Contrary to ACT’s principle of non- hierarchy, a co-founder became its leader due to his possession of traits valued in activist circles dominated by a white, middle-class, and masculine culture; and his politics informed by a particular radical activist subculture was adopted by ACT. Many were not allowed to join ACT for not embodying the expected activist criteria, which were exclusionary in the sense of being formulated through a white, middle- class culture. Ideological and tactical disagreements between ACT and other activists led to aggressive conflicts because of some ACT organizers’ intolerance to any aberration from the rigid understanding of ethics they upheld.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal-Industrial Complex‟ – a Concept & Method for Critical Animal Studies? Richard Twine
    ISSN: 1948-352X Volume 10 Issue 1 2012 Journal for Critical Animal Studies ISSN: 1948-352X Volume 10 Issue 1 2012 EDITORAL BOARD Dr. Richard J White Chief Editor [email protected] Dr. Nicole Pallotta Associate Editor [email protected] Dr. Lindgren Johnson Associate Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Laura Shields Associate Editor [email protected] Dr. Susan Thomas Associate Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Richard Twine Book Review Editor [email protected] Vasile Stanescu Book Review Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Carol Glasser Film Review Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Adam Weitzenfeld Film Review Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Matthew Cole Web Manager [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD For a complete list of the members of the Editorial Advisory Board please see the Journal for Critical Animal Studies website: http://journal.hamline.edu/index.php/jcas/index 1 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume 10, Issue 1, 2012 (ISSN1948-352X) JCAS Volume 10, Issue 1, 2012 EDITORAL BOARD ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Should We Eat Our Research Subjects? Advocacy and Animal Studies
    Animal Studies Journal Volume 7 Number 1 Article 9 2018 Should We Eat Our Research Subjects? Advocacy and Animal Studies Yvette M. Watt University of Tasmania, [email protected] Siobhan O'Sullivan University of New South Wales, [email protected] Fiona Probyn-Rapsey University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/asj Part of the Art and Design Commons, Australian Studies Commons, Creative Writing Commons, Digital Humanities Commons, Education Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Film and Media Studies Commons, Fine Arts Commons, Philosophy Commons, Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, and the Theatre and Performance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Watt, Yvette M.; O'Sullivan, Siobhan; and Probyn-Rapsey, Fiona, Should We Eat Our Research Subjects? Advocacy and Animal Studies, Animal Studies Journal, 7(1), 2018, 180-205. Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/asj/vol7/iss1/9 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Should We Eat Our Research Subjects? Advocacy and Animal Studies Abstract This paper examines data from a survey of Animal Studies scholars undertaken by the authors in 2015. While the survey was broad ranging, this paper focuses on three interconnected elements; the respondents’ opinions on what role they think the field should play in regard to animal advocacy, their personal commitment to animal advocacy, and how their attitudes toward advocacy in the field differ depending on their dietary habits. While the vast majority of respondents believe that the field should demonstrate a commitment to animal wellbeing, our findings suggest that espondents’r level of commitment to animal advocacy is informed by whether they choose to eat animal products or not.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Last Few Decades Both Public and Academic Interest in the Human-Animal Relationship Has Grown. Academically This New Inte
    Krisis 2017, Issue 2 2 www.krisis.eu The Theory and Practice of Contemporary Animal Rights Activism a different position, arguing that in some cases animal use is not problematic and Joost Leuven wouldn’t have to be abolished (Donaldson and Kymlicka 2011). Furthermore, some argue that animals deserve to be part of our communities and try to further con- ceptualise what a ‘post-animal liberation’ society would actually look like, asking questions relating to a range of subjects from animal citizenship to human-animal communication (Meijer 2016). Still, while there is much disagreement concerning what animal liberation really ought to mean, most authors seem to agree that we aren’t there yet. While there have been some improvements in the way domesticated animals are being treated, there hasn’t been a fundamental shift in how people relate to these animals. While the numbers of vegetarians might slowly be increasing in western countries, world- wide meat consumption still continues to rise (Donaldson and Kymlicka 2011, 2) and the number of animals whose habitat is being threatened by the continued In the last few decades both public and academic interest in the human-animal expansion of human settlements is still growing (Wadiwel 2009, 283-285). These relationship has grown. Academically this new interest has resulted not only in a figures contribute to the growing awareness within academic and activist circles large body of literature in the fields of animal ethics and political theory, but also that the contemporary animal rights movement might be winning some battles, in the birth of the new interdisciplinary field of human-animal studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Rights: Time to Start Unpacking What Rights and for Whom
    Mitchell Hamline Law Review Volume 46 Issue 1 Article 6 2019 Animal Rights: Time to Start Unpacking What Rights and for Whom Jane Kotzmann Nick Pendergrast Follow this and additional works at: https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/mhlr Part of the Animal Law Commons, and the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Kotzmann, Jane and Pendergrast, Nick (2019) "Animal Rights: Time to Start Unpacking What Rights and for Whom," Mitchell Hamline Law Review: Vol. 46 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/mhlr/vol46/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mitchell Hamline Law Review by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law Kotzmann and Pendergrast: Animal Rights: Time to Start Unpacking What Rights and for Whom ANIMAL RIGHTS: TIME TO START UNPACKING WHAT RIGHTS AND FOR WHOM Jane Kotzmann* and Nick Pendergrast** I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 158 II. AN IDEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW OF THE CONTEMPORARY ANIMAL ADVOCACY MOVEMENT*** ................................... 161 A. Singer and Animal Welfare ............................................. 162 B. Regan, Francione, and Animal Rights ............................. 167 C. Parallels to Human Rights in the Literature on Animal Rights ................................................................................ 172 III. ANIMAL WELFARE AND ANIMAL RIGHTS IN THE LAW ...... 173 A. Animal Welfare Laws ...................................................... 174 B. Animal Rights Laws ......................................................... 177 1. Recognition of Animal Rights in the United States: The Nonhuman Rights Project ......................................... 177 2. Recognition of Animal Rights in Argentina .............. 179 3. Recognition of Animal Rights in Switzerland ..........
    [Show full text]
  • 11. Towards Posthumanistic Curricula in Higher Education
    Tämä on rinnakkaistallennettu versio alkuperäisestä julkaisusta. Tämä on julkaisun kustantajan pdf. Käytä viittauksessa alkuperäistä lähdettä: Konst, T. 2020. Towards posthumanistic curricula in higher education. Teoksessa A. Mutanen, M. Friman, M. Kantola & T. Konst. (toim.) Human and nature. Turun ammattikorkeakoulun tutkimuksia 50. Turku: Turun ammattikorkeakoulu, 169 - 181. URL: http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522167491.pdf Kaikki julkaisut Turun AMK:n rinnakkaistallennettujen julkaisujen kokoelmassa Theseuksessa ovat tekijänoikeussäännösten alaisia. Kokoelman tai sen osien käyttö on sallittu sähköisessä muodossa tai tulosteena vain henkilökohtaiseen, ei- kaupalliseen tutkimus- ja opetuskäyttöön. Muuhun käyttöön on hankittava tekijänoikeuden haltijan lupa. This is a self-archived version of the original publication. The self-archived version is a publisher´s pdf of the original publication. To cite this, use the original publication: Konst, T. 2020. Towards posthumanistic curricula in higher education. In A. Mutanen, M. Friman, M. Kantola & T. Konst. (eds.) Human and nature. Research Reports from Turku University of Applied Sciences 255. Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences, 169 - 181. URL: http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522167491.pdf All material supplied via TUAS self-archived publications collection in Theseus repository is protected by copyright laws. Use of all or part of any of the repository collections is permitted only for personal non-commercial, research or educational purposes in digital and print form. You must obtain permission for any other use. 11. Towards posthumanistic curricula in higher education Taru Konst Introduction During the last few years, the European discussion on the development of higher ed- ucation has mainly focused on lifelong learning and future competences required at work. Tis also concerns Finland, where change in work and its requirements from education are emphasized in educational discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews: Interface 10 (1–2) Review Editors: Bjarke Skærlund Risager, Sutapa Chattopadhyay1, & Dawn Paley
    Interface: a journal for and about social movements Reviews Volume 10 (1-2): 322 - 365 (2018) Book reviews: Interface 10 (1–2) Review editors: Bjarke Skærlund Risager, Sutapa Chattopadhyay1, & Dawn Paley Books reviewed in this issue: Review essay: Social Activism, Academic Belligerence, and Critical Animal Studies David Alan Nibert and Sue Coe, 2017, Animal Oppression and Capitalism. Santa Barbara, California: Praeger (644 pp; Two Volumes; $164.00); Atsuko Matsuoka and John Sorenson, 2017, Critical Animal Studies: Towards Trans-Species Social Justice. London; New York: Rowman and Littlefield International (374 pp; £29.95) Review essay author: Andrew Kettler Wolfe, Mikael D. 2017. Watering the Revolution: An Environmental and Technological History of Agrarian Reform in Mexico. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. (317 pp. Paperback $26.95). Review author: Dawn Paley James Kelly, 2017, Food Rioting in Ireland in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries: The ‘Moral Economy’ and the Irish Crowd. Dublin: Four Courts Press (hardback; 272pp.; €45) Review author: T Mac Sheoin Pierpaolo Mudu and Sutapa Chattopadhyay, 2017, Migration, Squatting and Radical Autonomy. New York: Routledge (294 pp.; €32–114) Review author: Leslie Gauditz 1 Sutapa Chattopadhyay has not been involved in editing the review of their own book published in this issue. 322 Interface: a journal for and about social movements Reviews Volume 10 (1-2): 322 - 365 (2018) Zeynep Tufekçi, 2017, Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. London: Yale University Press (360 pp.; CA$30) Review author: Pascale Dangoisse Anna Feigenbaum, 2017, Tear Gas: From the Battlefield of World War I to the Streets of Today.
    [Show full text]