DOCSLIB.ORG

Success and Fail Factors in Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption a Comparison Between Norway and Sweden

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Success and Fail Factors in Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption a Comparison Between Norway and Sweden Success and Fail Factors in Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption A comparison between Norway and Sweden Master of Science Thesis For the degree of Master of Science in Management of Technology at Delft University of Technology By Ing. Eric S. Tol Student number 1519042 Project duration Dec 2016 – Aug 2017 Thesis committee Prof. Dr. G.P. van Wee Chairman, Delft University of Technology Dr. Ir. J.A. Annema Supervisor, Delft University of Technology Dr. Ir. U. Pesch Supervisor, Delft University of Technology [Page intentionally left blank] 2 CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ 6 LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................. 7 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................ 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................. 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 10 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Research problem ............................................................................................................. 12 1.2 Knowledge gaps ................................................................................................................ 12 1.3 Problem statement & research question .......................................................................... 13 1.4 Research objective and added value of the research ....................................................... 13 1.4.1 Societal relevance ...................................................................................................... 13 1.4.2 Managerial relevance ................................................................................................. 13 1.4.3 Scientific relevance ..................................................................................................... 13 1.5 Research scope .................................................................................................................. 14 1.6 Thesis structure ................................................................................................................. 15 2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................... 17 2.1 Technological innovation diffusion ................................................................................... 17 2.1.1 New versus incumbent technologies ......................................................................... 17 2.1.2 Technology development and diffusion ..................................................................... 18 2.1.3 Potential diffusion influencing factors ....................................................................... 19 2.2 Socio-technical lens ........................................................................................................... 20 2.3 Functions of Innovations Systems ..................................................................................... 21 3. METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 25 3.1 Desk research .................................................................................................................... 25 3.2 Interviews .......................................................................................................................... 25 3.2.1 Interview design ......................................................................................................... 25 3.2.1 Interview schedule ..................................................................................................... 27 3.3 History Event Analysis ....................................................................................................... 28 4. SYSTEM FUNCTIONS OF BEVs IN NORWAY AND SWEDEN ...................................................... 29 4.1 BEV statistics comparison Norway and Sweden ............................................................... 29 4.2 History Event Analysis process .......................................................................................... 33 4.3 BEV History Event Analysis Norway .................................................................................. 33 4.3.2 The first BEV related activities 1973-1989 ................................................................. 33 3 4.3.3 Norwegian support of the PIVCO project in 1990 ...................................................... 34 4.3.4 Further development of PIVCO 1991-1997 ................................................................ 35 4.3.5 Further market formation for BEVs in Norway 1998-2001 ........................................ 36 4.3.5 The end of domestic BEV manufacturers in Norway 2002-2011 ............................... 37 4.3.6 The accelerated increase of BEV market share in Norway 2012-2016 ...................... 39 4.4 BEV history event analysis Sweden ................................................................................... 40 4.4.1 Swedish domestic car manufacturers and alternative fuels 1927-1984 .................... 40 4.4.2 ‘Clean’ vehicles in Sweden 1985-2002 ....................................................................... 41 4.4.2 The rise and fall of FFVs and the emergence of BEV policy programs 2003-2010 ..... 43 4.4.3 Increased focus on electromobility in Sweden 2011-2016 ........................................ 45 4.5 System Functions BEV comparison Norway and Sweden ................................................. 46 4.5.1 F1: Entrepreneurial activities ..................................................................................... 47 4.5.2 F2: Knowledge creation .............................................................................................. 48 4.5.3 F3: Knowledge diffusion through networks ............................................................... 49 4.5.4 F4: Guidance of the search ......................................................................................... 50 4.5.5 F5: Market formation ................................................................................................. 51 4.5.6 F6: Resource mobilization .......................................................................................... 52 4.5.7 F7: Creation of legitimacy / counteract resistance to change ................................... 53 4.5.8 F#: External BEV influencing factors........................................................................... 53 4.6 Transferability of BEV policies and incentives................................................................... 55 4.7 Conclusion History Event Analysis ..................................................................................... 57 5. MOTORS OF CHANGE .............................................................................................................. 58 5.1 System Function interactions and Motors of Change ....................................................... 58 5.2 BEV system functions interactions Norway analysis ......................................................... 60 5.3 BEV system functions interactions Sweden analysis......................................................... 61 5.4 BEV motors of change comparison ................................................................................... 61 5.6 Motors of change conclusion ............................................................................................ 62 6. CONCLUSION & DISCUSSION ................................................................................................... 63 6.1 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 63 6.2 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 63 6.2.1 Institutional difference and implemented market formations .................................. 63 6.2.2 BEV introduction and selection .................................................................................. 64 6.2.3 Available energy resources ........................................................................................ 65 6.2.4 Swedish incumbent vehicle industry in Sweden ........................................................ 65 4 6.3 Contribution of the study .................................................................................................. 66 6.3.1 Scientific contribution ................................................................................................ 66 6.3.2 Managerial contribution ............................................................................................ 67 6.4 Limitations of the study & recommendations for further research ................................. 67 LITERATURE SOURCES ................................................................................................................. 70 APPENDIX .................................................................................................................................... 74 I: Further
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Timecode Systems Minitrx+ Manual
    An ultra compact timecode, genlock and word clock generator with transceiver www.timecodesystems.com/support/product-manuals quick start guide Here we give you a quick tour of your new Timecode Systems minitrx+, guiding you through its key features so you can get up and running straight away. What’s covered? The basics to getting started with: ● Timecode Systems: minitrx+ ● B:LINK Network: overview ● Timecode Buddy: app (free to download) The future of timecode starts here... Copyright Notice - Timecode Systems Limited All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the expressed written permission of Timecode Systems Ltd. Timecode Systems Ltd shall not be liable to the purchaser of this product or third parties for damages, losses, costs, or expenses incurred by the purchaser or third parties as a result of accident, misuse or abuse of this product or unauthorised modifications, repairs, or alterations to this product, or failure to strictly comply with Timecode Systems Ltd operating and installation instructions. The ‘Timecode Systems’ logo is a registered trademark. The ‘Timecode Systems: app” logo is a registered trademark. Timecode Systems minitrx+ manual page: 1 This is a guided tour of your highly accurate timecode, genlock and Wordclock generator and multi-channel digital timecode transceiver with B:LINK slave functionality. Control The Timecode Systems: minitrx+ settings are accessed and controlled from the front panel using the control knob and LCD display. 1 Antenna 2 LED 3 LCD Display 4 Control Knob 1. Antenna For the digital transceiver module operating in 870MHz (CE), 915MHz (FCC/IC) and 920MHz (ARIB) bands.
    [Show full text]
  • Norway's Efforts to Electrify Transportation
    Rolling the snowball: Norway’s efforts to electrify transportation Nathan Lemphers Environmental Governance Lab Working Paper 2019-2 Rolling the snowball: Norway’s efforts to electrify transportation EGL Working Paper 2019-2 September 2019 Nathan Lemphers, Research Associate Environmental Governance Lab Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy University of Toronto [email protected] Norway’s policies to encourage electric vehicle (EV) adoption have been highly successful. In 2017, 39 per cent of all new car sales in Norway were all-electric or hybrid, making it the world’s most advanced market for electric vehicles (IEA 2018). This high rate of EV ownership is the result of 30 years of EV policies, Norway’s particular political economy, and significant improvements in EV and battery technology. This paper argues that Norway’s sustained EV policy interventions are not only starting to decarbonize personal transportation but also spurring innovative electrification efforts in other sectors such as maritime transport and short- haul aviation. To explain this pattern of scaling, the paper employs Bernstein and Hoffmann’s (2018) framework on policy pathways towards decarbonization. It finds political causal mechanisms of capacity building and normalization helped create a welcoming domestic environment to realize early uptake and scaling of electric vehicles, and subsequently fostered secondary scaling in other modes of transportation. The initial scaling was facilitated by Norway’s unique political economy. Ironically, Norway’s climate leadership is, in part, because of its desire to sustain oil and gas development. This desire steered the emission mitigation focus towards sectors of the economy that are less contentious and lack opposing incumbents.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area the Associa on of Monterey Bay Area Governments August 2013
    E V Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area The Associa on of Monterey Bay Area Governments August 2013 The prepara on of this document was funded by a grant awarded by the Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air Pollu on Control District (MUAPCD), as part of the AB2766 program. Project Staff Alan Romero, Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air Pollu on Control District (MBUAPCD) AMBAG Dawn Mathes, Monterey County Resource Management Agency (RMA) Paul Hierling, Planner Carl P. Holm, Monterey County RMA Cody Meyer, Planner Craig Spencer, Monterey County RMA Anais Schenk, Planner Mario Salazar, Monterey County RMA Jason Adelaars, GIS Michael Ricker, City of Salinas Ecology Ac on Veronica Lezama, San Benito Council of Piet Canin, Vice President, Transporta on Governments Group Tegan Speiser, Santa Cruz County RTC Emily Glanville, Program Specialist Michael Zeller, TAMC Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air James Wasserman, Zero Motorcycles, Plug- Pollu on Control District In America Alan Romero, Air Quality Planner III Megan Tolbert, CSU Monterey Bay EV Communi es Alliance Piet Canin, Ecology Ac on Richard Corcoran, PEV Owner Richard Schorske, CEO Teresa Buika, UC Santa Cruz Previous staff contributors Richard Schorske, EV Communi es Alliance John Doughty Randy Deshazo, Principal Planner Linda Meckel, Planner, Project Manager MBEVA Plug-In Electric Vehicle Coordina ng Council Sharon Sarris, Green Fuse Energy Kris Markey, Offi ce of Monterey County Supervisor Parker Andy Hartmann, Interna onal Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Cheryl Schmi , City of Santa Cruz For more informa on regarding this study, contact Anais Schenk at [email protected] 2 E V Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area Execu ve Summary..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Business Model Innovation – the Solution for EV Producers
    Business Model Innovation – the solution for EV producers A qualitative study on Business Model Innovation in the context of Electric Vehicles in the Nordics MASTER THESIS WITHIN: Business Administration NUMBER OF CREDITS: 30 ECTS PROGRAMME OF STUDY: Strategic Entrepreneurship AUTHORS: Jakubas Buchtojarovas, Velislav Malchev JÖNKÖPING May, 2018 1 Master Thesis in Business Administration Title: Business Model Innovation – the solution for EV producers A qualitative study on Business Model Innovation in the context of Electric Vehicles in the Nordics Authors: Jakubas Buchtojarovas and Velislav Malchev Tutor: Naveed Akhter Date: 2018-05-21 Key terms: Business Model, Business Model Innovation, Electric Vehicles, Nordics, Electric Mobility, Case study Abstract Electric Vehicles are a growing trend globally and are currently disrupting the conventional automotive industry, therefore firms in the sector need new business models around their new value propositions. The concept of business model innovation presents an interesting point of view towards the challenges those firms face and provide possible solutions for them. Literature on this relatively new topic is scarce and needs more cumulative empirical research. We engage in a multiple-case study and explore how entrepreneurial and incumbent electric vehicle companies in the Nordics use BMI to overcome their biggest challenges and advance the development of the sector. With our findings, we provide an insight of some of the newest advancements in the EV technology, investigate what are the key antecedents, moderators and outcomes of the BMI process for the researched companies and build on the existing literature on the topic. Finally, practitioners can gain better understanding of the concepts of BM and BMI process and their importance for surviving in the dynamic electric vehicle market.
    [Show full text]
  • The Norwegian Electric Vehicle Market: a Technological Innovation Systems Analysis
    Research Report – UCD-ITS-RR-14-31 The Norwegian Electric Vehicle Market: A Technological Innovation Systems Analysis January 2014 Sydney Vergis Institute of Transportation Studies ◦ University of California, Davis 1605 Tilia Street ◦ Davis, California 95616 PHONE (530) 752-6548 ◦ FAX (530) 752-6572 www.its.ucdavis.edu The Norwegian Electric Vehicle Market: A Technological Innovation Systems Analysis Corresponding author: Sydney Vergis, AICP Mailing address: University of California, Davis- Institute of Transportation Studies 1605 Tilia St., Suite 100, UC Davis West Village Davis, CA 95616 Phone: (530) 752-6548 Email: [email protected] 1 The Norwegian Electric Vehicle Market: A Technological Innovation Systems Analysis ABSTRACT Ever since the internal combustion engine vehicle usurped the plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) at the beginning of 20th century, PEVs have only ever been an inconsequential niche product in the market. Now, however, they appear poised to make a come-back in certain markets, driven significantly by new battery technologies, building upon the technological evolution of hybrids, and motivated by new policies focused on reducing greenhouse gas pollutants. Understanding how this market is likely to evolve in different jurisdictions requires an understanding of the major factors, technical, economic, and societal, that are driving this change. This paper applies a technological innovation system framework consisting of seven indicators- knowledge development and diffusion, influence on the direction of search, entrepreneurial experimentation, market formation, legitimation, resources mobilization, and development of positive externalities- to examine Norway as a case-study of actors, institutions, and networks that have led to relatively high levels of electric vehicle adoption. Factors that appear to contribute strongly to Norway's battery-electric market shares include significant consumer incentives including purchase and in-use incentives.
    [Show full text]
  • View Transportation & Air Quality
    TRANSPORTATION & AIR QUALITY 140 | ARC GREEN COMMUNITIES 2020 CERTIFICATION SUBMISSION 39. COMMUTE OPTIONS DESCRIPTION OF MEASURE The local government discourages employees from driving alone by offering and subsidizing alternatives, such as a vanpool or carpool program, or subsidizing transit at a greater value than parking. The local government also offers incentives to reduce employee commutes during peak hours such as compressed work weeks, telecommuting, and/or flexible work schedules. To meet the intent of this measure, the local government must offer its employees one primary option and three supporting options. Primary Options: 1. At least $30 per month towards a transit pass or vanpool pass to each employee who commutes using transit or a vanpool. If the local jurisdiction offers a parking subsidy more than $30/month, this option’s value must be greater than that of the parking subsidy. 2. At least $30 per month to each employee who carpools with two or more passengers. If the local jurisdiction offers a parking subsidy more than $30/month, this option’s value must be greater than that of the parking subsidy. 3. A significant telecommuting or compressed work week program that reduces by at least 5 percent the number of employee commuting trips. Supporting commute options: 1. active participation in a voluntary regional air quality program through a local employer service organization or Georgia Commute Options program 2. active participation in carpool, vanpool and biking partner matching (such as through Georgia Commute Options) 3. pre-tax transit subsidy or vanpool subsidy deducted from employee paycheck 4. transit benefit of less than $30 per month 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Plug-In Electric Vehicle Sales in California
    FACTORS AFFECTING PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLE SALES IN CALIFORNIA 2017 FINAL REPORT CONTRACT NO. 13-303 PREPARED FOR: CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD RESEARCH DIVISION CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 1001 I STREET SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814 PREPARED BY: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES, CA 90095 MAY 23, 2017 To view an electronic color version of this report and for more information about ARB Research Division’s research and activities, please visit our website: http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/research.htm 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ 10 Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Chapter 1: Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 11 1.1 Summary of Findings ............................................................................................................................. 11 1.2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 14 1.3 Report Road Map and Research Questions .......................................................................................... 14 Chapter 2: Data and Methods .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B: Consumer Acceptance of Zero Emission Vehicles and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles
    Californias Advanced Clean Cars Midterm Review Appendix B: Consumer Acceptance of Zero Emission Vehicles and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles January 18, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. ii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................i vi I. Key Findings ...................................................................................................................... 1 II. Introduction and Background .............................................................................................. 4 II.A. Data Sources ............................................................................................................... 4 III. Recent Market Development and Current Status ............................................................... 4 III.A. Historic and Current Sales Trends ............................................................................ 5 III.A.1. Model Availability............................................................................................... 6 III.A.2. U.S. ZEV and PHEV Sales ................................................................................ 8 III.A.3. Dealership Vehicle Availability ..........................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicles and Psychology
    sustainability Review Electric Vehicles and Psychology Fabio Viola Dipartimento d’Ingegneria, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] Abstract: The popularity of electric vehicles is evidenced by the broad range of manufacturers presenting new models of plug-in hybrid and battery vehicles. However, the success of the revolution or, rather, the rebirth of electric vehicles, is hanging by a thread, as it lacks the involvement of a large number of users, and many psychological mechanisms hinder it. What are users’ true feelings about this new world of vehicles? Are people ready for the fifth level of automation, i.e., fully automatic driving and the absence of the driving position? The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss the psychological aspects that influence the adoption of electric vehicles. Topics such as the chicken and egg paradox (electric vehicles and charging stations) and performance anxiety (regarding, e.g., range) are addressed. This review is characterized by contradictions and irony. Keywords: electric vehicles; range anxiety; chicken and egg paradox; battery; public perception; key motivators and barriers 1. Introduction Psychology is an integral part of our daily life. The perception of reality is the result of conditioning, which may be positive. The car user is inundated with information that valorizes aspects that often have little to do with driving itself. On the other hand, the ideology of the present reigns, which tries to ensure the preservation of the status quo. An ideology that can halt progress is thinking of the present as the child of the past, i.e., in which the teachings of the past are obsolete and desire for the future is neglected in favor of a more comfortable present.
    [Show full text]
  • Norway's Electric Vehicle Policies
    Engelsk mal: Startside Alternativ 1 Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment Norway's electric vehicle policies Tom O. Johnsen, Department for Climate Change, Section for Transport and Local Environment Oslo, 14 August 2017 Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment Engelsk mal:Tekst med kulepunkter GHG-emissions from transport in 2015 Mill. tonne CO2. eqv. Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment 2 Engelsk mal: Tekst med kulepunkter - 1 vertikalt bilde Reducing emissions from transport • Reduce transport, e.g. by urban planning • Transfer to transport with lower emissions, e.g. cars buses • Reduce emissions from the individual vehicle, e.g. electric vehicles and biofuels. Foto: Ilja Hendel/NTBscanpix Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment 3 Engelsk mal:Tekst med kulepunkter Main EV policies • Exemption from value added tax. Normal rate: 25 % • Exemption from registration tax. On average: 10000 euros • No subsidies per se • Public company Enova: Supporting charging infrastructure • Free toll roads, free public parking and free charging at public charging stations, access to bus lanes, free/reduced fees on ferries • Relatively high taxes on fossil fuels Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment 4 TARGET OF 2017: Development of policy and sales 50.000, MORE THAN SET IN 2012 100.000 Accumulated sales of electric cars, Norway 50 000 40 000 30 000 NO CHANGE Kewet (Buddy) IN 20 000 Pivco (Think) MEASURES 10 000 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Zero registration tax Mitsubishi I-Miev
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Charging Points in Oslo
    – - A CITY’S STRATEGY TO SUPPORT THE USE OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND BECOME THE WORLD’S ELECTRIC VEHICLE CAPITAL 1 TABLET OF CONTENTS Introduction – Electric Vehicles in Norway ................................................................................................................ 3 Task of establishing 400 charging points in for years in Oslo..................................................................................... 6 What kind of technical equipment is needed to charge an EV and how to procure it? ........................................ 7 How to find locations for charging points .............................................................................................................. 9 Where to find the electricity needed to provide the charging stations with power ........................................... 12 What kind of parking signs to be used on the charging stations? ....................................................................... 12 How to control that only electric vehicles use the charging points? ................................................................... 13 What kind of services is needed to be procured from an electrical entrepreneur? ............................................ 14 Should there be mandatory charging at the charging stations? .......................................................................... 14 How to increase off-street charging points .......................................................................................................... 15 Joint collaboration
    [Show full text]
  • Experiences and Opportunities with Electric Vehicles
    Summary: Electromobility in Norway - experiences and opportunities with Electric vehicles Summary of TØI report 1281/2013 Authors: Erik Figenbaum and Marika Kolbenstvedt Oslo 2013, English language Electrification of vehicles is an important measure to reduce environmental impacts and climate gas emissions from transport. Electric propulsion is energy efficient, does not cause local emissions and reduces noise. The main challenges with electric propulsion is related to range, price and the production of batteries. A long lasting broad interaction between private enterprises, public authorities and non government organizations, have resulted in Norway being home to the largest per capita Electric vehicle market in the world. The Electric vehicle share of the total vehicle market was around 3% in the first half of 2013 and the share of the fleet reached 0,5%. From the 1990s Electric vehicles have been high on the political agenda resulting in the introduction of incentives necessary to meet market challenges, and encourage the early adopters to test the new technology. Economic incentives such as exemption from vehicles taxes (registration tax, VAT) have secured the potential to sell Electric vehicles competitively. Reductions in the annual circulation tax on vehicle ownership and exemptions from toll road charges, reduce the owner costs compared to conventional vehicles. The public investment support for charging infrastructure reduces the range issue in daily transport activities. The access to bus lanes has only been available for the Electric vehicle owners. The combined effect of these and other incentives, has made Electric vehicles popular with increasingly larger shares of car buyers in Norway. The Electric vehicle market in Norway is expected to continue to grow as more models are coming on the market, and given the government decision to extend the economic incentives through 2017.
    [Show full text]