AIP Access Roads Permitting EA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AIP Access Roads Permitting EA United States Department of the Interior BLM Bureau of Land Management Socorro Field Office 901 S. Highway 85 Socorro, NM 87801 Environmental Assessment for Arizona Interconnection Project Access Roads Permitting In portions of Catron, Socorro, Sierra, and Luna counties NEPA Number DOI-BLM-NM-A020-2014-0021-EA _________________________________________________________ Signature and Title of Project Lead Date ________________________________________________________________ Signature and Title Lead of Reviewer Date This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1. Background ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2. Purpose and Need ............................................................................................... 1-4 1.3. Applicant’s Objective ......................................................................................... 1-4 1.4. Decisions to Be Made ......................................................................................... 1-5 1.4.1. Bureau of Land Management .............................................................. 1-5 1.4.2. United States Forest Service ................................................................ 1-5 1.5. Plan Conformance .............................................................................................. 1-5 1.5.1. Applicable Laws and Executive Orders .............................................. 1-6 1.6. Scoping and Issues ............................................................................................. 1-6 1.6.1. Internal Scoping .................................................................................. 1-6 1.6.2. External Scoping ................................................................................. 1-6 1.6.3. Resource Issues Identified ................................................................... 1-7 1.7. Tribal Consultation ............................................................................................. 1-7 Chapter 2. Proposed Action and Alternatives ......................................................................... 2-1 2.1. Description of Proposed Action ......................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1. Access to Project Facilities .................................................................. 2-1 2.1.2. Work Areas at Transmission Structures .............................................. 2-1 2.2. No Action Alternative ........................................................................................ 2-5 2.3. Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Avoidance Alternatives ................... 2-5 2.3.1. Alternative 1 – Approximately 1.6-mile BLM .................................... 2-5 2.3.2. Alternative 2 – Approximately 2.8-mile BLM and State Land ........... 2-5 2.4. Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis ...................... 2-5 2.5. Proposed Action Improvements and Activities .................................................. 2-8 2.5.1. Expected Operations and Maintenance Activities ............................... 2-8 2.5.2. Access Roads ....................................................................................... 2-8 2.5.3. Structure Work Areas ........................................................................ 2-11 2.5.4. Staffing and Safety ............................................................................ 2-12 2.5.5. Right-of-Way Considerations ............................................................ 2-13 2.5.6. Termination and Restoration ............................................................. 2-13 2.5.7. Design Features ................................................................................. 2-14 2.6. Summary of Proposed Action .......................................................................... 2-18 Chapter 3. Affected Environment ............................................................................................ 3-1 3.1. Project Resource Review .................................................................................... 3-1 3.2. Earth Resources .................................................................................................. 3-3 3.2.1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.2. Affected Environment ......................................................................... 3-3 3.3. Paleontological Resources ................................................................................ 3-11 3.3.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-11 3.3.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-12 3.4. Water Resources ............................................................................................... 3-15 3.4.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-15 3.4.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-15 AIP Access Roads Permitting Project Final EA i 10/12/2016 3.5. Biological Resources ........................................................................................ 3-19 3.5.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-19 3.5.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-19 3.6. Wildland Fire .................................................................................................... 3-39 3.6.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-39 3.6.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-40 3.7. Land Uses ......................................................................................................... 3-40 3.7.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-40 3.7.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-41 3.8. Special Designation Areas ................................................................................ 3-46 3.8.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-46 3.8.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-46 3.9. Recreation ......................................................................................................... 3-49 3.9.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-49 3.9.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-49 3.10. Visual Resources .............................................................................................. 3-50 3.10.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-50 3.10.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-64 3.10.3. BLM VRI Classifications .................................................................. 3-65 3.10.4. Agency Management Objectives ....................................................... 3-66 3.11. Cultural Resources and Tribal Concerns .......................................................... 3-66 3.11.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-66 3.11.2. Culture History .................................................................................. 3-67 3.11.3. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-82 3.11.4. Inventoried Cultural Resource Sites .................................................. 3-83 3.11.5. Cultural Resource Sites on BLM Land ............................................. 3-83 3.11.6. Cultural Resource Sites on Forest Service Land ............................... 3-84 3.11.7. Cultural Resource Sites on NMSLO and Private Land ..................... 3-85 3.11.8. Definition of the Area of Potential Effects ........................................ 3-86 3.12. Air Quality and Climate ................................................................................... 3-87 3.12.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-87 3.12.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-87 3.13. Livestock Grazing ............................................................................................ 3-90 3.13.1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 3-90 3.13.2. Affected Environment ....................................................................... 3-90 Chapter 4. Environmental Effects ............................................................................................ 4-1 4.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1.1. Impact Assessment Methodology ....................................................... 4-1 4.1.2. Cumulative Impacts
Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Natural Resources Committee
    WATER AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE 2012 INTERIM FINAL REPORT to the FIFTIETH LEGISLATURE SECOND SESSION New Mexico Legislative Council Service Santa Fe, New Mexico December 2012 WATER AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE 2012 REPORT Santa Fe, New Mexico December 2012 2012 LEGISLATIVE INTERIM WATER AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE SUMMARY OF WORK The committee scheduled five meetings during the 2012 interim that were held in Las Cruces, Truth or Consequences, Ruidoso, Albuquerque and Santa Fe. Continued drought and major wildfires again dominated the news in 2012. Through November 2012, the average precipitation for New Mexico was near the record lowest value, ranking as the second driest since 1895, as severe to exceptional drought continued across New Mexico, and the average temperature for the state for the year was the highest on record. It was also the second consecutive year during which record-breaking wildfires burned across the state. The lightning-sparked Whitewater-Baldy Complex Fire in the Gila Wilderness burned more than 297,845 acres, which surpassed the area burned by the Las Conchas Fire of 2011, making it the largest wildfire in New Mexico state history. The Little Bear Fire was also started by a lightning strike; it burned 44,330 acres and 254 buildings in Lincoln County after quickly growing out of control due to dry, windy conditions. The city of Ruidoso and the surrounding area will need more than $14 million in the coming years to address the effects of that fire on their drinking water supplies alone. At the committee's joint meeting in August with the Courts, Corrections and Justice Committee, the committees reviewed several legal issues of concern to both committees, including the state's suit against the federal Bureau of Reclamation on its administration of Rio Grande Project water, implementation of the Pecos River Settlement, the status of ongoing adjudications and the need for spaceport liability legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Butch Cassidy Roamed Incognito in Southwest New Mexico
    Nancy Coggeshall I For The New Mexican Hideout in the Gila Butch Cassidy roamed incognito in southwest New Mexico. Hideout in the Gila utch Cassidy’s presence in southwestern New Mexico is barely noted today. Notorious for his successful bank Butch Cassidy roamed and train robberies at the turn of the 20th century, incognito in southwest Cassidy was idealized and idolized as a “gentleman out- New Mexico wilderness Blaw” and leader of the Wild Bunch. He and various members of the • gang worked incognito at the WS Ranch — set between Arizona’s Blue Range and San Carlos Apache Reservation to the west and the Nancy Coggeshall rugged Mogollon Mountains to the east — from February 1899 For The New Mexican until May 1900. Descendants of pioneers and ranchers acquainted with Cassidy tell stories about the man their ancestors knew as “Jim Lowe.” Nancy Thomas grew up hearing from her grandfather Clarence Tipton and others that Cassidy was a “man of his word.” Tipton was the foreman at the WS immediately before Cassidy’s arrival. The ranch sits at the southern end of the Outlaw Trail, a string of accommodating ranches and Wild Bunch hideouts stretching from Montana and the Canadian border into Mexico. The country surrounding the WS Ranch is forbidding; volcanic terrain cleft with precipitously angled, crenelated canyon walls defies access. A “pretty hard layout,” local old-timer Robert Bell told Lou Blachly, whose collection of interviews with pioneers — conducted PROMIENT PLACES - between 1942 and 1953 — are housed at the University of New OUTLAW TRAIL Mexico. What better place to dodge the law? 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Trails in the Aldo Leopold Wilderness Area Recently Maintained & Cleared
    l y R. 13 W. R. 12 W. R. 11 W. r l R. 10 W. t R. 9 W. R. 8 W. i r e t e 108°0'W m 107°45'W a v w o W a P S S le 11 Sawmill t Boundary Tank F t 6 40 10 i 1 6 Peak L 5 6 7M 10 11 9 1:63,360 0 0 8 9 12 8 8350 anyon Houghton Spring 4 7 40 7 5 7 T e C 1 in = 1 miles 11 12 4 71 7 7 0 Klin e C 10 0 C H 6 0 7 in Water anyon 8 9 6 a 4 0 Ranch P 4065A 7 Do 6 n 4 073Q (printed on 36" x 42" portrait layout) Houghton ag Z y 4 Well 12 Corduroy Corral y Doagy o 66 11 n 5 aska 10 Spr. Spr. Tank K Al 0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2 9 Corduroy Tank 1 1 14 13 7 2 15 5 0 4 Miles 5 Doagie Spr. 5 16 9 Beechnut Tank 4 0 17 6 13 18 n 8 14 yo 1 15 an Q C Deadman Tank 16 D Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 12NTransverse Mercator 3 3 3 17 0 r C 2 Sawmill 1 0 Rock 7 18 a Alamosa 13 w 6 1 Spr. Core 14 Attention: Reilly 6 Dirt Tank 8 15 0 Peak 14 Dev. Tank 3 Clay 4 15 59 16 Gila National Forest uses the most current n 0 16 S o 17 13 Santana 8163 1 17 3 y Doubleheader #2 Tank 18 Fence Tank Cr.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of New Mexico
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE MOGOLLON HIGHLANDS: SETTLEMENT SYSTEMS AND ADAPTATIONS edited by Yvonne R. Oakes and Dorothy A. Zamora VOLUME 6. SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS Yvonne R. Oakes Submitted by Timothy D. Maxwell Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 232 SANTA FE 1999 NEW MEXICO TABLE OF CONTENTS Figures............................................................................iii Tables............................................................................. iv VOLUME 6. SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS ARCHITECTURAL VARIATION IN MOGOLLON STRUCTURES .......................... 1 Structural Variation through Time ................................................ 1 Communal Structures......................................................... 19 CHANGING SETTLEMENT PATTERNS IN THE MOGOLLON HIGHLANDS ................ 27 Research Orientation .......................................................... 27 Methodology ................................................................ 27 Examination of Settlement Patterns .............................................. 29 Population Movements ........................................................ 35 Conclusions................................................................. 41 REGIONAL ABANDONMENT PROCESSES IN THE MOGOLLON HIGHLANDS ............ 43 Background for Studying Abandonment Processes .................................. 43 Causes of Regional Abandonment ............................................... 44 Abandonment Patterns in the Mogollon Highlands
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS THOMAS S. PRATT, ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Vet. App. No. 19 - 919 ) ROBERT L. WILKIE, ) Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ) Appellee ) APPELLANT’S APPLICATION FOR AN AWARD OF REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) Appellant Thomas S. Pratt, by counsel and pursuant to both the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) (Title 28 U.S. Code §2412) and Rule 39 of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ Rules of Practice and Procedure, moves this Court for an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses in the amount of $12,976.93. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On December 17, 2018, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) issued a decision that denied Appellant entitlement to a change in his vocational rehabilitation program under Chapter 31 of Title 38 of the United States Code. Board of Veterans’ Appeals Decision, December 17, 2018 (Docket No. C 29 731 036). Appellant timely appealed the Board’s denial of his claims by filing a Notice of Appeal with the Court on February 11, 2019. Following the submission of his Notice of Appeal, Appellant’s case proceeded on the merits under the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Counsel for the Appellant entered an appearance in the case on May 10, 2019, and submitted no dispute with the 3599-page Record Before the Agency (RBA). The Court ordered the Appellant to file a 1 brief within sixty days of May 29, 2019, and subsequently ordered a telephonic conference under Court Rule 33 to be held on July 9, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Geohydrology of the San Agustin Basin, Alamosa Creek Basin
    Geohydrology of the San Agustin Basin, Alamosa Creek Basin upstream from Monticello Box, and upper Gila Basin in parts of Catron, Socorro, and Sierra Counties, New Mexico By R.G. Myers, J.T. Everheart, and C.A. Wilson U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 94-4125 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW MEXICO STATE ENGINEER OFFICE Albuquerque, New Mexico 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey District Chief Earth Science Information Center U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports Section Water Resources Division Box 25286, MS 517 4501 Indian School Rd. NE, Suite 200 Denver Federal Center Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract.................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and scope...................................................................................................................... 3 Location and extent.................................................................................................................... 3 Ctimate....................................^ 3 Previous hydrologic investigations.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Wilderness
    INTERNATIONAL Journal of Wilderness DECEMBER 2005 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 3 FEATURES SCIENCE AND RESEARCH 3 Is Eastern Wilderness ”Real”? PERSPECTIVES FROM THE ALDO LEOPOLD WILDERNESS RESEARCH INSTITUTE BY REBECCA ORESKES 30 Social and Institutional Influences on SOUL OF THE WILDERNESS Wilderness Fire Stewardship 4 Florida Wilderness BY KATIE KNOTEK Working with Traditional Tools after a Hurricane BY SUSAN JENKINS 31 Wilderness In Whose Backyard? BY GARY T. GREEN, MICHAEL A. TARRANT, UTTIYO STEWARDSHIP RAYCHAUDHURI, and YANGJIAN ZHANG 7 A Truly National Wilderness Preservation System BY DOUGLAS W. SCOTT EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION 39 Changes in the Aftermath of Natural Disasters 13 Keeping the Wild in Wilderness When Is Too Much Change Unacceptable to Visitors? Minimizing Nonconforming Uses in the National Wilderness Preservation System BY JOSEPH FLOOD and CRAIG COLISTRA BY GEORGE NICKAS and KEVIN PROESCHOLDT 19 Developing Wilderness Indicators on the INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES White Mountain National Forest 42 Wilderness Conservation in a Biodiversity Hotspot BY DAVE NEELY BY RUSSELL A. MITTERMEIER, FRANK HAWKINS, SERGE RAJAOBELINA, and OLIVIER LANGRAND 22 Understanding the Cultural, Existence, and Bequest Values of Wilderness BY RUDY M. SCHUSTER, H. KEN CORDELL, and WILDERNESS DIGEST BRAD PHILLIPS 46 Announcements and Wilderness Calendar 26 8th World Wilderness Congress Generates Book Review Conservation Results 48 How Should America’s Wilderness Be Managed? BY VANCE G. MARTIN edited by Stuart A. Kallen REVIEWED BY JOHN SHULTIS FRONT COVER The magnificent El Carmen escaprment, one of the the “sky islands” of Coahuilo, Mexico. Photo by Patricio Robles Gil/Sierra Madre. INSET Ancient grain grinding site, Maderas del Carmen, Coahuilo, Mexico. Photo by Vance G.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, February 18, 2020
    Camera #1 Good Morning Cougars! Today is Tuesday, February 18th and my name is ______ . Camera #1 And my name is _______ Welcome to the Cabin John Morning News Show!! Camera #1 Please stand for the pledge of allegiance. (Pause for a 5 seconds) Camera #1 I pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Camera #1 Please be seated. (Pause for a 3 seconds) Here’s _____ and _____with today’s weather and more announcements for the day. Camera #2 Thank you _____. Todays weather will be cloudy with occasional showers and sunset at 5:48pm today. Camera #2 We will have a high near 60 degrees and winds from the south of about 10 to 15 miles per hour. Camera #2 Attention CJMS, International Night planning is underway! We invite all students, their families and staff for the CJMS International Night! Camera #2 On Friday, March 6th, Cabin John will go International with a celebration of our cultures! Camera #2 Please help make this a night to remember by attending this event. Better yet, you can volunteer with a performance, or host a table, representing the best of your favorite country! Camera #2 Sign up links are available on the Cabin John website. Sign up to host a Country table, or to Perform, or sign up for both experiences! Camera #2 We encourage families to work together, too!! We hope you will support and attend this event! Camera #2 The deadline for any and all SSL forms is Friday June 5th, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Impact Reports (Firs) Are Prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for Standing Finance Committees of the NM Legislature
    Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other purposes. Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (www.nmlegis.gov). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North. F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T ORIGINAL DATE 02/07/13 SPONSOR Herrell/Martinez LAST UPDATED 02/18/13 HB 292 SHORT TITLE Transfer of Public Land Act SB ANALYST Weber REVENUE (dollars in thousands) Recurring Estimated Revenue Fund or Affected FY13 FY14 FY15 Nonrecurring (See Narrative) There (See Narrative) There may be additional may be additional Recurring General Fund revenue in future years. revenue in future years. (Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decrease ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands) 3 Year Recurring or Fund FY13 FY14 FY15 Total Cost Nonrecurring Affected General Total $100.0 $100.0 $200.0 Recurring Fund (Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases) Duplicate to SB 404 SOURCES OF INFORMATION LFC Files Responses Received From Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) General Services Department (GSD) Economic Development Department (EDD) Department of Cultural Affairs (DCA) Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD) State Land Office (SLO) Department of Transportation (DOT) Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) House Bill 292 – Page 2 SUMMARY Synopsis of Bill House Bill 292 (HB 292) is the Transfer of Public Lands Act.
    [Show full text]
  • A Path Through the Wilderness: the Story of Forest Road
    A Path Through the Wilderness: The Story of Forest Road 150 Gila National Forest Erin Knolles Assistant Forest Archeologist March 2016 1 National Forest System Road 150 [commonly referred to as Forest Road (FR) 150], begins within the confines of the Gila National Forest and stretches north about 55 miles from NM 35 near Mimbres past Beaverhead Work Center to NM 163 north of the Gila National Forest boundary. FR 150 is the main road accessing this area of the Gila National Forest. Its location between two Wilderness Areas, Aldo Leopold and the Gila, makes it an important corridor for public access, as well as, administrative access for the Gila National Forest. Forest Road 150: The Name and a Brief History FR150 has been known by several names. The road was first called the North Star Road by the residents of Grant County and the U.S. Military when it was constructed in the 1870s.1 Today, the route is still called the North Star Road and used interchangeably with FR 150. Through most of the 20th century, FR 150 was under New Mexico state jurisdiction and named New Mexico (NM) 61.2 Of interest is that topographical maps dating to at least 1980, list the road as both NM 61 and FR 150.3 This is interesting because, today, it is common practice not to give roads Forest Service names unless they are under the jurisdiction of the Forest Service. In addition, the 1974 Gila National Forest Map refers to the route as FR 150.4 There is still some question when the North Star Road and NM 61 became known as FR 150.
    [Show full text]
  • Mother Hubbard
    Gila National Forest Plan Revision Evaluation Report of Lands Inventoried for Potential Wilderness Characteristics Final Report, December 2019 Cover Photo by Eric Flood: Gila River, Gila Wilderness In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]