DOCSLIB.ORG

Alaska Post Newspaper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alaska Post Newspaper FREE RECYCLED an edition of the Recycled material is used in the making of our ALASKA POST newsprint The Interior Military News Connection Vol. 8, No. 25 Fort Wainwright, Alaska June 23, 2017 RED FLAG-Alaska planning fortifies multinational tactics Airman 1st Class Sadie Colbert 35th Fighter Wing Public Affairs Groups of pilots and mission coordinators jostle their eyes between a large screen and a map of the airspace during a mission planning brief with Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, a fellow Air Force Base out of Anchorage, Alaska, on June 12. After a training scenario explanation, the chatter of tactical plans and counter-attacks bounced back and forth between personnel as they prepared for a large force exercise mission during RED FLAG-Alaska 17-2. “We are preparing by integrating multinational, multi- mission design series solutions to tactical problems,” added Lt. Col. Travis Ruhl, the 353rd Combat Training Squadron commander. “We prepare because this could be a team in the Republic of Korea Air Force, U.S. Air Force and Japan Air Self-Defense Force members begin PACAF area of responsibility that will go out to fight.” mission planning during RED FLAG-Alaska (RF-A) 17-2, June 12, 2017, at Eielson Air Force Base, Maj. Zachary Fennel, the 353rd CTS range division assistant Alaska. RF-A is a two-week, multilateral large force exercise with many other nations, including Denmark, Finland and Israel, who participate to better overall tactics as one cohesive unit. (Photo by See REDFLAG on page 4 Airman 1st Class Sadie Colbert, 35th Fighter Wing Public Affairs) Training for the open road 1st Lt. Harley Spier Executive Officer, Alpha Company, 25th Brigade Support Battalion It is no secret that the Army is an inherently dangerous occupation. From jumping out of aircraft, firing Howitzers, to driving big trucks, danger is a part of the job. For Alpha Company, 25th Brigade Support Battalion the mission is to drive big trucks and move big pieces of equipment in May was National Historic support of the 1st Stryker Brigade Combat Team and we take great pride in our Preservation Month ability to reduce the danger Casey Woster the country. Many people who live in of that mission. Fort Wainwright Architectural Fairbanks, however, are unaware of the According to the Historian existence of the NHL, and many more do U.S. Army Readiness not understand what makes this special Center, Fiscal Year 2017 May was designated as Historic place so significant. currently has had five Preservation Month in the United States, By definition, a National Historic Army vehicle accidents presenting an opportunity for discussion Landmark is a nationally significant result in fatalities. Alpha about what makes Ladd Army Airfield a historic place designated by the Secretary Company is constantly on Soldiers with Alpha Company, 25th Brigade National Historic Landmark. Considered of the Interior because it embodies Support Battalion, 1st Stryker Brigade Combat the road moving equipment, a point of pride for Fort Wainwright, exceptional value or quality in illustrating Team conduct Preventative Maintenance Checks recovering Strykers and Ladd Field National Historic Landmark or interpreting the heritage of the United providing fuel and water and Services on a vehicle during driver’s training last week on Fort Wainwright. (Photo by 1st Lt. encompasses the horseshoe area of North States. A National Historic Landmark assets to the 1SBCT. Post, both runways, and the buildings can be something as well-known as the With all those big trucks Harley Spier, Executive Officer, Alpha Company, 25th Brigade Support Battalion) on the north side of Montgomery Road. Alamo, recognized for its role in the 1836 on the road, we have to stay Ladd Army Airfield draws visitors Battle of the Alamo, or as little known up to date and proficient every year, and is a source of curiosity with our training. We have See ROAD on page 7 for military history enthusiasts across See LADD on page 7 Join the USO force behind the forces Staff Report variety of support programs and outreach United Service Organizations activities in addition to what goes on in our USO Centers. There are a variety of There are more than 30,000 USO projects, events, USO Center shifts and volunteers world-wide. USO volunteers activities for volunteers to work. keep America’s service members You can’t bring kids with you when connected to family, home and country you volunteer. throughout their service to our nation. Answer: True AND False. Because we True or False? need our volunteers to focus on supporting USO volunteers must have military our USO Center guests, projects or events, experience or know someone in the as well as for the children’s safety; we military. don’t allow volunteers to bring younger Answer: False. USO volunteers children along while volunteering. include service members, military However, we DO have parent/teen family members, retirees, veterans AND volunteer opportunities. There are also civilians without any military experience occasional group volunteer activities that or affiliation. may include children ages 10-14, with The United Service Organizations Inc. is a nonprofit organization that provides You just hand out snacks or plan parent supervision. programs, services and live entertainment to United States Armed Forces parties. members and their Families. (Photo courtesy Fort Wainwright USO) Answer: False. The USO offers a wide See VOLUNTEER on page 2 WEEKEND WEATHER MILITARY AVOID LOCAL HEMP FAIRS With the legalization of marijuana in Alaska, various businesses are again hosting a Hemp & Cannabis Fair in Fairbanks. Please be aware that military personnel are not permitted to attend these functions and violations are subject to punishment under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). It is strongly recommended Friday Saturday Sunday that federal employees avoid these functions and to be aware and cautious of Mostly Cloudy, Highs Cloudy, Highs in the Partly Cloudy, Highs in products containing marijuana substances. All forms of marijuana are banned on in the mid 70s. Lows lower 70s. Lows in the the mid 70s. Lows near Federal property. For more information call the U.S. Army Alaska’s Criminal Law near 50. mid 50s. 50. Division at 384-3991. 2 NEWS June 23, 2017 Nutrition Corner: Myth busters All adults should avoid caffeine- Myth. 64mg/fl oz and soda contains 1-4 mg/fl oz. Consuming Featured Recipe: More than 95 percent of all adults consume caffeine in energy drinks is not advised as these products contain Chocolate peanut butter smoothie some form or another. Caffeine is natural and functions very large amounts of caffeine in each serving and in the body as a stimulant. For most healthy adults, most cans have more than one serving. There are also ½ cup 1% low fat milk there is no requirement to avoid caffeine completely nor compounds in many of these products that enhance the 1 1/2 Tbsp cocoa powder is a moderate intake generally unhealthy. effects of the caffeine and may result in stomach issues, 2 Tbsp honey For most healthy adults, moderate caffeine sleep problems, and other undesired outcomes. 2 Tbsp creamy peanut butter consumption, equivalent to about three 8-oz cups of Many caffeinated products contain added calories 1 frozen ripe banana regular coffee a day, can be incorporated into a balanced mostly from sugar and fat. Be mindful when adding 6 oz. vanilla low fat yogurt diet and lifestyle. That being said, individuals who do sugar and cream to your coffee and consider a non- not currently consume caffeine are not encouraged to nutritive sweetener and skim milk/1% as a substitute. Place all ingredients in a blender; process until incorporate it into their daily intake. Avoid high calorie containing sodas and specialty smooth. Caffeine comes mostly from coffee beans, tea leaves, coffee drinks. Do not mix caffeine and alcohol together cocoa beans, and kola nuts and can be added to foods as it can increase the risk of alcohol-related adverse References: and beverages. If caffeine is added to a product, it must effects. There are certain populations (pregnancy for https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/ be listed on the ingredient list. example) that should limit or avoid caffeine so be sure resources/2015-2020_Dietary_Guidelines.pdf Many products that contain caffeine vary in the to speak to your health care provider concerning your caffeine content. For example, espresso contains about caffeine intake. MEDDAC Minute IMPORTANT PHONE NUMBERS available at the end of the race. To pre- Emergency: 911 register or for more information, call 24 Hour Nurse Advice Line: 361-3057. 1-800-874-2273 Opt. 1 Appointment Line: 361-4000 OPTOMETRY Behavioral Health: 361-6059 The optometry clinic welcomes all Benefits Advisor: 361-5656 beneficiaries: active duty, spouses, Immunizations: 361-5456 children, retirees. If it’s been over a Information Desk: 361-5172 year since your last eye exam take the Patient Advocate: 361-5291 time to make an appointment. The Pharmacy Refills: 361-5803 clinic provides services for routine Substance Abuse/Clinical exams, contact lens fitting, physicals, Counseling: 361-4054 diabetic exams, refractive surgery Tricare On-Line: www. referrals, and acute ocular problems. Most volunteers make friends within the tricareonline.com Appointments can be made through VOLUNTEER USO and enjoy coming back to volunteer United Health Care: Central appointments (361-4000), Continued from page 1 again! uhcmilitarywest.com, 877-988-9378 Optometry front desk, or Tricare Volunteer are always needed. We Appointments Online. I won’t be able to do things I like to do welcome service members, spouses, PERFORMANCE TRIAD TIP as a USO volunteer. retirees, veterans and civilians. If you are 35 or older, have your STAY IN THE KNOW Answer: False. USO staff are always If you’re interested in volunteering blood cholesterol checked regularly For health tips, information on looking for volunteers with “super with USO Alaska, visit https://alaska.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joint Land Use Study
    Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study United States Army, Fort Wainwright United States Air Force, Eielson Air Force Base Fairbanks North Star Borough, Planning Department July 2006 Produced by ASCG Incorporated of Alaska Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study Fairbanks Joint Land Use Study This study was prepared under contract with Fairbanks North Star Borough with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content reflects the views of Fairbanks North Star Borough and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment. Historical Hangar, Fort Wainwright Army Base Eielson Air Force Base i Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study Table of Contents 1.0 Study Purpose and Process................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Study Objectives ............................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Planning Area................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Participating Stakeholders.............................................................................................. 4 1.5 Public Participation........................................................................................................ 5 1.6 Issue Identification........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Letter 2 (PDF)
    SARAH PALIN, GOVERNOR 410 Willoughby Avenue, Suite 303 Post Office Box 111800 DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Juneau, Alaska 99811-1800 OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER Phone: 907-465-5066 Fax: 907-465-5070 www.dec.state.ak.us October 20, 2008 Elin Miller, Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Mail Code: RA-140 Seattle, WA 98101-3140 Dear Ms. Miller: The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) has reviewed your th August 18 letter regarding EPA’s PM2.5 designations for Alaska and the nonattainment boundaries for the communities of Fairbanks and Juneau. We have carefully considered the available data and analyses. ADEC believes the available scientific evidence does not support EPA’s boundary recommendations which substantially expand upon those recommended by us. ADEC believes public health will be protected and the applicable legal requirements met by taking the actions described in this letter, which include a proposed nonattainment boundary for the Fairbanks area that is larger than originally proposed by ADEC, but smaller than proposed by EPA. For Juneau, we are requesting EPA revisit certain assumptions and include data from 2008 before making a final decision on whether a nonattainment designation is warranted, and if so, the appropriate boundaries of the nonattainment area. Protecting public health is a goal we share with EPA. As you are already aware, we are proactively and expeditiously working with the local governments to address identified PM2.5 concerns in Fairbanks and Juneau. To this end, ADEC does not believe EPA’s proposed boundaries will ultimately assist in protecting public health.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968)
    Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968) Prepared by Amy Ramirez . Jeanne Lambin . Robert L. Meinhardt . and Casey Woster 2016 The Cultural Resource Programs of the National Park Service have responsibilities that include stewardship of historic buildings, museum collections, archeological sites, cultural landscapes, oral and written histories, and ethnographic resources. The material is based upon work assisted by funding from the National Park Service. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior. Printed 2018 Cover: Atwood Center, Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage, 2017, NPS photograph MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY ARCHITECTURE IN ALASKA HISTORIC CONTEXT (1945 – 1968) Prepared for National Park Service, Alaska Regional Office Prepared by Amy Ramirez, B.A. Jeanne Lambin, M.S. Robert L. Meinhardt, M.A. and Casey Woster, M.A. July 2016 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Historic Context as a Planning & Evaluation Tool ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Boreal Partners in Flight 2009 Project Summaries
    Boreal Partners in Flight 2009 Project Summaries Table of Contents BCR REPORTS BCR 1 – Renner ………………………………………………………………….……….4 BCR 2 – Savage…………………………………………………………………………...4 BCR 5 – Cady………………………………………………………...…………………...6 PROJECT SUMMARIES Ajmi – Fort Wainwright Tanana Flats Training Area and Yukon Training Area………..7 Ambrose et al. – American Peregrine Falcon (Falocperegrinus anatum) Monitoring along the Upper Yukon River in Yukon-Charley River National Preserve……………………………………………………………………………….….10 Baluss and Hopey – Tongass National Forest Partners in Flight…………………….…12 de Zeeuw – New National Eagle Take Permit Program…………………………...……13 Ely and Shook – Tundra Swan Avian Influenza Sampling on the North Slope of Alaska……………………………………………………………………………………14 Gotthardt et al. – Biogeography of Select Avian Species in Alaska’s National Parks…………………………………………………………..………….………………14 Griese and Moran – Elmendorf AFB Update…………………………………………..15 1 Harwood – Landbird Update for Kanuti NWF...........................................................…..15 Johnson et al. – Using Satellite Telementry to Determine Migratory Movements of Short-eared Owls from the Seward Peniusula……………………………………….…..16 Johnson et al. – Landbird Update from Tetlin NRW………………………...…………16 Kirchhoff – The Audubon Alaska WatchList……………………………………….…..20 Kovach – Bird Monitoring at Innoko NWR…………………………………….……….21 Macander and Augustine – USAF Goose Forage Study, the Near Island Group in Western Aleutians…………………………………………………..................................21 Matsuoka and Pardieck – North American
    [Show full text]
  • Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Market Overview
    Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Market Overview July 18, 2012 Contents . Definitions . Facts & Figures . UAS Budgets and Spending . Trends and Challenges . Future of Unmanned Aerial Systems . Summary and Recommendations . Appendix A: DoD UAS Acquisition Costs . Appendix B: DoD Current and Future Domestic UAS Locations 2 7/18/2012 ©2012 Deltek, Inc. All Rights Reserved Definitions . Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) . Refers to systems whose components include the necessary equipment, network, and personnel to control an unmanned aircraft . UAS is a broader term that includes equipment, networks, and personnel in addition to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) . Refers to a powered aerial vehicle that does not carry a human operation, uses aerodynamic forces to provide vehicle life, can fly autonomously or be piloted remotely, can be expendable or recoverable, and can carry a lethal or nonlethal payload . Commonly known as “drones”. In practice, the terms UAS and UAV are often used interchangeably Source: CRS Report R41284, “Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Acquisition: Issues for Congress,” December 27, 2011. 3 7/18/2012 ©2012 Deltek, Inc. All Rights Reserved Facts & Figures . Dept. of Defense (DoD) spending on UAS has increased from $284 million in FY00 to $3.9 billion in FY12 . DoD’s unmanned aircraft inventory increased more than 40-fold from 167 aircraft in 2002 to nearly 7,500 in 2010 . In 2009, DoD completed almost 500,000 UAS flight hours just in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom . In May 2010, unmanned systems surpassed one million flight hours . In November 2010 unmanned systems achieved one million combat hours Sources: CRS Report R41284, “Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Acquisition: Issues for Congress,” December 27, 2011; CRS Report R42136, “Unmanned Aerial Systems,” January 3, 2012; Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Download (PDF)
    Q&A: JCS Vice Roles and Missions Reboot? 48| Pilot Training 44| Cost-Per-E ect Calculus 60 Chairman Gen. John Hyten 14 THE NEW ARCTIC STRATEGY Competition Intensifies in a Critical Region |52 September 2020 $8 Published by the Air Force Association THOSE BORN TO FLY LIVE TO WALK AWAY ACES 5®: Proven and ready Protecting aircrew is our mission. It’s why our ACES 5® ejection seat is the world’s only production seat proven to meet the exacting standards of MIL-HDBK-516C. Innovative technologies and consistent test results make ACES 5 the most advanced protection for your aircrew. Plus, we leverage 40 years of investment to keep your life-cycle costs at their lowest. ACES 5: Fielded and available today. The only ejection seat made in the United States. collinsaerospace.com/aces5 © 2020 Collins Aerospace CA_8338 Aces_5_ProvenReady_AirForceMagazine.indd 1 8/3/20 8:43 AM Client: Collins Aerospace - Missions Systems Ad Title: Aces 5 - Eject - Proven and Ready Filepath: /Volumes/GoogleDrive/Shared drives/Collins Aerospace 2020/_Collins Aerospace Ads/_Mission Systems/ACES 5_Ads/4c Ads/ Eject_Proven and ready/CA_8338 Aces_5_ProvenReady_AirForceMagazine.indd Publication: Air Force Magazine - September Trim: 8.125” x 10.875” • Bleed: 8.375” x 11.125” • Live: 7.375” x 10.125” STAFF Publisher September 2020. Vol. 103, No. 9 Bruce A. Wright Editor in Chief Tobias Naegele Managing Editor Juliette Kelsey Chagnon Editorial Director John A. Tirpak News Editor Amy McCullough Assistant Managing Editor Chequita Wood Senior Designer Dashton Parham Pentagon Editor Brian W. Everstine Master Sgt. Christopher Boitz Sgt. Christopher Master Digital Platforms Editor DEPARTMENTS FEATURES T-38C Talons Jennifer-Leigh begin to break 2 Editorial: Seize 14 Q&A: The Joint Focus Oprihory the High Ground away from an echelon for- Senior Editor By Tobias Naegele Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan 2013
    INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN 2013 611th Air Support Group Alaska Installations U.S. AIR FORCE, 611th AIR SUPPORT GROUP, ALASKA 611th CIVIL ENGINEER SQUADRON, ASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN 2013 611th Air Support Group, Alaska Installations This revised Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) meets requirements of the Sikes Act (16 USC 670a et seq.) as amended and as approved in previous plans in 2007, 2008, and 2009 by the 611th Air Support Group Commander, the Alaska Regional Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game commissioner. Use and mission of the installations have not significantly changed since approval of the previous plans. The Short and Long Range Radar Sites and Eareckson Air Station INRMPs were approved for use in 2007; the King Salmon Airport INRMP was approved for use in 2008; and the Inactive Sites INRMP was approved for use in 2009. They will remain in use until replaced by the final version of this plan. The primary change in this revised INRMP is that of format to follow guidance provided in Air Force Instruction 32-7064. This INRMP also groups installations from the four previous plans into one document. Data specific to each installation and management goals, objectives, and projects have also been updated and included in this revision. Sikes Act Cooperating Agencies* ROBYN M. BURK, Colonel, USAF Commander 611th Air Support Group GEOFFREY HASKETT Regional Director, Region 7 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service *Above signatures are digital copies of originals, which are on file at the 611th Air Support Group.
    [Show full text]
  • BUILDING 92___HABS No. TX
    BUILDING 1190 (FAI-01531) Eielson Air Force Base Fairbanks North Star Borough Alaska PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation Office of History and Archaeology 550 West 7th Avenue, Suite 1310 Anchorage, AK 99501 NOSE DOCK HANGAR (Building 1190 at Eielson Air Force Base) Location: Eielson Air Force Base, Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska Present United States Air Force Owner: Present Hangar is currently not in use Occupant: Significance: Building 1190 (FAI-01531) is a small hangar with a wooden segmented bow arch roofline constructed in 1947 to service modified B-29 bombers. It was one of four identical hangars constructed along the flightline and the last to remain standing. By 1958, Building 1190 was used as an Air Terminal Operations Center (ATOC) to ship supplies to locations throughout the world. It continued in this capacity until 2013, when it was acquired by the Alaska Air National Guard and used for storage. Due to the deteriorated condition of the wooden structure, it is scheduled for demolition. The hangar is significant for its distinctive bow arch construction, its association with the first wave of construction that supported U.S. reconnaissance activities against the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and its later mission as an international air freight terminal. Historian: Charissa W. Durst, AIA, LEED AP Organization: Hardlines Design Company 4608 Indianola Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43214 Tel: 614-784-8733 Fax: 614-784-9336 FAI-01531 Page 1 Part I. The Physical Setting of Building 1190 Building 1190 (built in 1947) is located along the main runway of Eielson Air Force Base, which was originally a satellite of Ladd Field (completed in October 1940).
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Restoration Program Elelson Air Force Base, Alaska
    C(4e (!)C)-S Hr File: 180 Further disseimination only as directed by Manager, Environmental Restoration Program D.B Directorate, Ejelson Air Force Base, February 19,93, or higher DoD authority United States Air Force Environmental Restoration Program Elelson Air Force Base, Alaska Site Management Plan Elelson Air Force Base, Alaska April 1993 Site Management Plan Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska April 1993 Prepared for U.S. Air Force Eielson Air Force Base * ~~~~~~~Environmental Restoration Program Fairbanks Alaska under Contract DE-ACO6-76RL0 1830 Prepared by Pacific Northwest Laboratory for Environmental Management Operations under a Related Services Agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management Operations Richland, Washington 99352 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .. .. .......................... ................ 1 2.0 OPERABLE UNIT INVESTIGATIONS. .. ...... ...................... 17 3.0 SOURCE EVALUATION REPORTS. .. ............................... 30 4.0 TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS. .. ............................... 34 5.0 SITE-WIDE INVESTIGATION. .. ............................ .... 35 6.0 REFERENCES .. .. .......................... ................. 40 APPENDIX A: FIELD SAMPLING PLAN .. ........ .................... A.1 APPENDIX B: QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN. .. ........ ..........B.1 APPENDIX C: HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN .. .. ........................ C.1 LIST OF TABLES 1.1 Summary of IRP Investigations and Reports .. .. ...... ........ 5 1.2 Source Area Descriptions. .. .. ...... .. ...... ............
    [Show full text]
  • Eielson Air Force Base Operable Unit 1 Record of Decision
    OD-1 •anora a< Oaolatoa ll«l«an Alx roroa Baa* . Lb Eielson Air Force Base Operable Unit 1 Declaration of the Record of Decision Site Name and Location Operable Unit I Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska statement of Basis and Purpose This decision dociunent presents the selected remedial actions and no action decisions for Operable Unit i (OUl) at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, chosen in accordanc?: with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, mid Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfitnd Amendments ami Reaiithonzation Act (SARA), the May 1591 Federal Facility Agreement Under CERCLA Section 120 entered into by the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and. - the State of Alaska, and to the extent practicable, the National Contingency Plan. This decision is based on the administrative record file for this operable unit. The State of Alaska concurs with the selected remedies and the no action decisions. Assessment of the Sites in Operable Unit 1 OU1 consists of eight source areas that have been combined because of commonalty in contamination that is mainly caused by leaks and spUls of fiiels. The QUI source areas are • ST20 E-7, E-8, and E-9 Complexes (RefueUng Loop) • ST48 Power Plant Area • ST49 Alert Hanger • SSSO Blair I^es Vehicle Maintenance • SS51 Blair Lakes Ditch • SS52 Blair Lakes Diesel SpiU • SS53 Blair Lakes Fuel SpUl • DP54 Blair Lakes Dnun Disposal Site Three ofthe source areas (ST49, SS53, and DPS4) wUl receive no further remedial action because they present Uttle risk to human health and the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • 89 STAT. 546 PUBLIC LAW 94-107—OCT. 7, 1975 Public Law 94-107 94Th Congress an Act Uct
    89 STAT. 546 PUBLIC LAW 94-107—OCT. 7, 1975 Public Law 94-107 94th Congress An Act Uct. /, 1975^ rpQ authorize certain construction at military installations, and for other purposes. [S. 1247] Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the Military United States of America in Congress assenibled^ construction and guard and reserve TITLE I—ARMY forces facilities authorization acts, 1976. SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop mili­ Military tary installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, converting, Construction rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, Authorization including land acquisition, site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, Act, 1976. and equipment for the following acquisition and construction: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Defense Support Activity (Fargo Building), Boston, Massachu­ setts, $8,000,000. Fort Bragg, North Carolina. $13,214,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $13,680,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $10,732,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $46,281,000. Fort Sam Houston, Texas, $870,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $31,861,000. Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, $2,892,000. Fort Ord, California, $32,209,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $54,361,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $1,685,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $14,879,000. Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Airfield, Georgia, $39,480,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Fort Benning, Georgia, $44,212,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia, $633,000. Fort Gordon, Georgia, $6,945,000. Fort Jackson, South Carolina, $14,546,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky, $42,898,000. Fort Lee, Virginia, $719,000. Fort McClellan, Alabama, $41,090,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Samurai Gate Sept.29, 2017
    A fully-armed U.S. Air Force F-15 Eagle receives fuel from a KC-135 Stratotanker over the Pacifi c Ocean, Sept. 23. Through air refueling operations, U.S. Air Force and allied aircraft have the capability to eliminate threats and promote security across the Indo-Asia-Pacifi c region. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman John Linzmeier) By Cheryl Pellerin by ours, and would lose any arms race Defense Media Activity or confl ict that it initiates.” 9/26/2017 - WASHINGTON — Air Commitment to Defense Force B-1B Lancer bombers from Th is fl ight was in response to North Bombers, Guam and Air Force F-15 Eagle fi ghter Korea’s escalatory launch of intercon- escorts from Okinawa, Japan, fl ew in tinental ballistic missiles on July 3 and international airspace over the waters July 28, intermediate range ballistic east of North Korea, Sept. 23, Defense missile launches over Japan on Aug. Department spokesman Army Col. 28 and Sept. 14, and a nuclear test on fighters Rob Manning said, Sept. 25. Sept. 2, Manning said, all of which In a show of force, Manning told violate many U.N. Security Council Pentagon reporters, the aircraft fl ew resolutions. north of the Demilitarized Zone, North Korea must choose to stop the farthest north any U.S. fi ghter or isolating itself and stand down its fly in bomber has fl own off North Korea”s nuclear weapons program, the colonel coast in the 21st century, underscoring added. the seriousness of North Korea’s “reck- “As always, our commitment is to less behavior.” the defense of our allies and our part- He added, “Th e United States seeks ners and remains ironclad,” he said.
    [Show full text]