A303 Stonehenge Improvement the “Parker Route”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A303 Stonehenge Improvement the “Parker Route” Balfour Beatty/Costain JV Highways Agency Temple Quay House 2 The Square Temple Quay Bristol BS1 6HA A303 Stonehenge Improvement The “Parker Route” Assessment Report Volume 1 January 2004 Document Reference No. P1A-HIG-GEN-R018 In association with Balfour Beatty A303 Stonehenge Improvement Balfour Beatty-Costain Parker Route Assessment Halcrow-Gifford Document Ref: P1A-HIG-GEN-R018 December 2003 A303 Stonehenge Improvement Balfour Beatty-Costain Parker Route Assessment Halcrow-Gifford Balfour Beatty-Costain Joint Venture Halcrow-Gifford Joint Venture 7 Mayday Road 2nd Floor Cross Keys House Thornton Heath Queen Street Surrey CR7 7XA Salisbury Wiltshire SP1 1EY Tel +44 (0)20 8684 6922 Tel 01722 342400 Fax +44 (0)20 8710 5151 Direct Tel +44 (0)20 8710 5060 Direct Fax +44 (0)20 8710 5222 The Balfour Beatty-Costain Joint Venture in association with the Halcrow-Gifford Joint Venture have prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their client, the Highways Agency, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. Document Ref: P1A-HIG-GEN-R018 December 2003 A303 Stonehenge Improvement Balfour Beatty-Costain Parker Route Assessment Halcrow-Gifford Document Ref: P1A-HIG-GEN-R018 December 2003 A303 Stonehenge Improvement Balfour Beatty-Costain Parker Route Assessment Halcrow-Gifford Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description (Print) (Print) (Print) (Signature) (Signature) (Signature) A 20/01/04 Alex Gilbert Gareth Davies Stuart Final Draft Bromley Document Ref: P1A-HIG-GEN-R018 December 2003 A303 Stonehenge Improvement Balfour Beatty-Costain Parker Route Assessment Halcrow-Gifford Document Ref: P1A-HIG-GEN-R018 December 2003 A303 Stonehenge Improvement Balfour Beatty-Costain Parker Route Assessment Halcrow-Gifford CONTENTS VOLUME 1: REPORT AND APPENDICES 1 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1 1.1 Background..................................................................................................1 1.2 Scope...........................................................................................................1 1.3 Highways Agency / Wiltshire County Council Responsibility and Roles ......2 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS........................................................................................3 2.1 Highway Network.........................................................................................3 2.2 Traffic Flows.................................................................................................3 2.3 Environmental Conditions ............................................................................3 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ROUTE ............................................................................5 3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................5 3.2 A303 Realignment .......................................................................................5 3.2.1 Western Tie-in Junction 5 3.2.2 Western Tie-in to A360 Junction (Ch. 0 – 10,000) 5 3.2.3 A360 Junction 6 3.2.4 A360 Junction to A345 Junction (Ch. 10,000 – 13,800) 6 3.2.5 A345 Junction 7 3.2.6 A345 Junction to the Eastern Tie-in (Ch. 13,800 – 25,700) 7 3.2.7 Eastern Tie-in Junction 8 3.3 Eastern Link.................................................................................................8 3.3.1 A303 Junction to A30 Junction (Ch. 0 – 3,500) 8 3.3.2 A30 Junction to A36 Junction (Ch. 3,500 – 7,200) 8 3.4 Treatment of the existing road network........................................................9 4 ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT ...........................................................................11 4.1 Highways ...................................................................................................11 4.1.1 Engineering Standards 11 4.1.2 Geology and Geotechnics 11 4.1.3 Earthworks 12 4.1.4 Surfacing 12 4.1.5 Drainage 12 4.1.6 Other Highway Features 13 4.1.7 Public Utilities 13 4.2 Structures ..................................................................................................14 Document Ref: P1A-HIG-GEN-R018 i December 2003 A303 Stonehenge Improvement Balfour Beatty-Costain Parker Route Assessment Halcrow-Gifford 4.2.1 General 14 4.2.2 Railway Bridges 14 5 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .....................................................................15 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................15 5.2 Methodology ..............................................................................................15 5.3 Cultural Heritage........................................................................................17 5.3.1 Sources of Information 17 5.3.2 Baseline Conditions 17 5.3.3 Assessment of Impacts and Effects 27 5.3.4 Mitigation 33 5.3.5 Summary 34 5.4 Landscape .................................................................................................35 5.4.1 Sources of Information 35 5.4.2 Baseline conditions 35 5.4.3 Mitigation 40 5.4.4 Summary 40 5.5 Nature Conservation and Biodiversity........................................................43 5.5.1 Sources of Information 43 5.5.2 Baseline Conditions 43 5.5.3 Assessment of Impacts and Effects 45 5.5.4 Mitigation 53 5.5.5 Summary 53 5.6 Water .........................................................................................................55 5.6.1 Sources of Information 55 5.6.2 Baseline Conditions 55 5.6.3 Assessment of Impacts and Effects 59 5.6.4 Mitigation 63 5.6.5 Summary 64 5.7 Geology and Soils......................................................................................65 5.7.1 Sources of Information 65 5.7.2 Baseline Conditions 65 5.7.3 Assessment of Impacts and Effects 68 5.7.4 Mitigation 68 5.7.5 Summary 68 5.8 Noise and Vibration....................................................................................69 5.8.1 Sources of Information 69 5.8.2 Baseline Conditions 69 5.8.3 Assessment of Impacts and Effects 70 5.8.4 Mitigation 71 5.8.5 Summary 72 5.9 Air Quality ..................................................................................................73 5.9.2 Sources of Information 73 5.9.3 Baseline Conditions 74 5.9.4 Assessment of Impacts and Effects 75 5.9.5 Mitigation 76 Document Ref: P1A-HIG-GEN-R018 ii December 2003 A303 Stonehenge Improvement Balfour Beatty-Costain Parker Route Assessment Halcrow-Gifford 5.9.6 Summary 77 5.10 Pedestrians, cyclists, equestrians and community effects .........................79 5.10.1 Sources of Information 79 5.10.2 Baseline Conditions 79 5.10.3 Assessment of Impacts and Effects 79 5.10.4 Mitigation 86 5.10.5 Summary 86 5.11 Vehicle Travellers ......................................................................................87 5.11.1 Sources of Information 87 5.11.2 Baseline Conditions 87 5.11.3 Assessment of Impacts and Effects 87 5.11.4 Mitigation 89 5.11.5 Summary 89 5.12 Land Use ...................................................................................................91 5.12.1 Sources of Information 91 5.12.2 Baseline Conditions 92 5.12.3 Assessment of Impacts and Effects 94 5.12.4 Mitigation 100 5.12.5 Summary 100 5.13 Disruption Due to Construction ................................................................101 5.13.1 Key Construction activities 101 5.13.2 Assessment of Impacts and Effects 101 5.13.3 Mitigation 102 5.14 Policies and Plans....................................................................................103 5.14.1 Sources of Information 103 5.14.2 Baseline Conditions 103 5.14.3 Assessment of Impacts and Effects 103 5.14.4 Mitigation 108 5.14.5 Summary 108 6 TRAFFIC AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT......................................................109 6.1 Modelling methodology ............................................................................109 6.1.1 Sources of Data and Definition of Traffic Model 109 6.1.2 Development of Traffic Model 110 6.1.3 Traffic Model Validation 112 6.2 Forecasting ..............................................................................................117 6.3 Effect of the route.....................................................................................117 6.4 Economic Analysis...................................................................................120 6.4.1 Cost 120 6.4.2 Analysis 120 7 ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS..................................................................................123 7.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................123 7.2 Traffic Calming the Packway....................................................................123 Document Ref: P1A-HIG-GEN-R018 iii December 2003 A303 Stonehenge Improvement Balfour Beatty-Costain Parker Route Assessment Halcrow-Gifford 7.3 Western Fast Link ....................................................................................124 7.4 Removal of Western Tie-in Junction ........................................................125 7.5 Bypass for Shrewton................................................................................125 8 OVERALL SUMMARY .......................................................................................127 Document Ref: P1A-HIG-GEN-R018 iv December 2003 A303 Stonehenge Improvement Balfour Beatty-Costain Parker Route Assessment Halcrow-Gifford List of Tables Table 2.1: Summary of the existing
Recommended publications
  • Appendix 14.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment
    APPENDIX 14.1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESK BASED ASSESSMENT ANDOVER BUSINESS PARK Andover County of Hampshire Archaeological desk–based assessment June 2007 Archaeology Service ANDOVER BUSINESS PARK Andover County of Hampshire Archaeological desk–based assessment National Grid Reference: 433000 145700 Project Manager Stewart Hoad Reviewed by Jon Chandler Author Helen Dawson Graphics Carlos Lemos Museum of London Archaeology Service © Museum of London 2007 Mortimer Wheeler House, 46 Eagle Wharf Road, London N1 7ED tel 020 7410 2200 fax 020 7410 2201 email [email protected] web www.molas.org.uk Archaeological desk-based assessment MoLAS 2007 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Origin and scope of the report 2 1.2 Site status 2 1.3 Aims and objectives 2 2 Methodology and sources consulted 4 3 Legislative and planning framework 6 3.1 National planning policy guidance 6 3.2 Regional guidance: 6 3.3 Local Planning Policy 7 4 Archaeological and historical background 9 4.1 Site location, topography and geology 9 4.2 Overview of past archaeological investigations 10 4.3 Chronological summary 11 5 Archaeological potential 20 5.1 Factors affecting archaeological survival 20 5.2 Archaeological potential 20 6 Impact of proposals 22 6.1 Proposals 22 6.2 Implications 22 7 Conclusions and recommendations 24 8 Acknowledgements 25 9 Gazetteer of known archaeological sites and finds 26 10 Bibliography 29 10.1 Published and documentary sources 29 10.2 Other Sources 30 10.3 Cartographic sources 30 i P:\HAMP\1021\na\Field\DBA_22-06-07.doc Archaeological desk-based assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Download Business Details (PDF)
    Company Name: Salisbury Storage Ltd Primary Trade: Storage Distance from you: 0.00Miles Contact Name: Henry Langdon Full Address: 2 Field Barn Cottages Salterton Salisbury Postcode: SP4 6AL Contact Telephone: 01722 698 000 Contact Email: [email protected] Contact Fax: Company Website: http://www.salisburystorage.co.uk Company Number: Contact Mobile: Comments: Container Self Storage If youre looking for container storage, we have yards in: Southampton Road - Salisbury Old Sarum Airfield - Salisbury Highpost - Amesbury Shrewton - Nr Stonehenge Deptford - Warminster Our container storage has seven days a week access 24 hours a day for your convenience. The yards are gated and we will issue you with a combination to enter the main gate. We also have a CCTV system and night lighting for extra security. Storage You have the container key and your top quality, new container is located on hard standing. Moving House If you are between houses and need to store your furniture, then our containers are ideal, and with access for larger vehicles, your removal company can also get access. Service Personnel Our secure, dry storage is ideally situated for Salisbury, Amesbury, Durrington, Bulford and Wilton areas making it ideal for service personnel needing to store valuable items while abroad. Services Provided: Removals / Storage / House Clearance Storage Traders Overall Rating: 0 Points Number of reviews: 0 Customer Service Quality of Work/Service Punctuality / Efficiency / Time Taken 1 / 2 Comments from consumers who have used this trader 2 / 2 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Larkhill Medical & Dental Facility
    Aspire Defence Capital Works Army Basing Programme 2020 Landscape and Visual Study: Larkhill Medical & Dental Facility (ROGGEN) January 2016 Document No: 27-ROGGEN-43-RT-L1-001 Rev A Document Status Rev. Date Purpose of Issue Prep. Chkd. Appr. O 15.01.16 Draft for Discussion RJC TFT DAG A 19.06.17 For Planning RJC TFT DAG CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Methodology 3.0 Planning Policy 4.0 Elements of the Landscape 5.0 Landscape Character 6.0 Visual Amenity 7.0 Mitigation 8.0 Conclusion APPENDICES Appendix A – National Character Area Appendix B – Salisbury District Landscape Character Assessment FIGURES Figure 1* Landscape Constraints Figure 2* Landscape Context Figure 3* Topography Figure 4 Receptor Viewpoint Locations Figure 5 Receptor Viewpoint Photography Figure 6 Illustrative Building Proposals Figure 7 Visibility Matrix * reproduced from Landscape and Visual Appraisal, Capita June 2015, Document No: 27- XXXGEN-43-RT-L1-001 Aspire Defence Capital Works – Landscape & Visual Study – Larkhill Medical & Dental ROGGEN 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 Wiltshire’s landscape has been intensively used by the military for well over a century. Salisbury Plain is one of the largest training areas in the UK. 1.1.2 A hybrid planning application for the masterplan proposals for delivery of the Army Basing Programme (ABP) 2020 at MoD Larkhill has recently been submitted, as has a detailed application for the development of two messes and single living accommodation on the northern area of the camp. This draft report describes the landscape and visual effects of a proposed further development of a medical and dental facility (the scheme), which would replace an existing, smaller building that currently occupies part of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Top, Springhill Lane, St Mary Bourne, Andover, Hampshire SP11 6BG
    Demolition of Existing Buildings and Proposed Erection of 8 Dwellings - Bank Top, Springhill Lane, St Mary Bourne, Andover, Hampshire SP11 6BG Client: Spear Design Projects Ltd Landscape Appraisal February 2017 Bradford-Smith Ltd, 5 Thorold Road, Farnham, Surrey, GU9 7JY Tel.no: 01252 714607 email: [email protected] www.brafordsmith.co.uk CONTENTS: CONTENTS: ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1 SCOPE OF WORK AND BACKGROUND ........................................................................... 4 2 SITE LOCATION & CONTEXT ........................................................................................... 8 3 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................................. 9 4 PLANNING CONTEXT ..................................................................................................... 11 5 LANDSCAPE BASELINE: LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ..................................................... 15 6 LANDSCAPE BASELINE: SITE SETTING, SURVEY AND ANALYSIS .............................. 23 7 VISUAL APPRAISAL ........................................................................................................ 27 8 LANDSCAPE RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................... 30 9 LANDSCAPE STRATEGY .................................................................................................. 32 10 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Where to Fly Guide & Corporate Member Listing
    AAOOPPAA WHERE TO FLY GUIDE & CORPORATE MEMBER LISTING The Pilot Centre Plymouth Flying School Ltd RD Flying Denham Aerodrome t/a Flynqy Pilot Training c/o Parley Golf Centre Denham St Mawgan Parley Uxbridge Newquay Christchurch Middlesex UB9 5DF Cornwall TR8 4RQ Dorset BH23 6BB Tel: 01895 833838 Tel: 01637 861744 Tel: 01258 471983 Fax: 01895 832267 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: BEDFORDSHIRE Website: www.pilotcentre.co.uk www.plymouthflyingschool.co.uk Cessna 152 1 Azure Flying Club PA28-161 3 PA28 3 Building 166, Cranfield Airport Cessna 152 5 Cessna 152 2 ESSEX Cranfield Cessna 172 1 Andrewsfield Aviation Ltd Bedfordshire MK43 0AL Cessna 182 1 CUMBRIA Saling Airfield Tel: 01234 758110 Cessna 182RG 1 Stebbing, Dunmow Fax: 01234 758110 Bellanca Citabria 1 Carlisle Flight Training & Aero Club Essex CM6 3TH Website: www.flyazure.com Carlisle Airport Hangar 30 Tel: 01371 856744 Wycombe Air Centre Ltd PA28 180C Cherokee 2 Carlisle Fax: 01371 850955 PA28 160 Warrior 3 Wycombe Air Park Cumbria CA6 4NW E-mail: [email protected] NB: No longer exclusive to Tui Travel Booker, Marlow Tel: 01228 573344 Web: www.andrewsfield.com staff Buckinghamshire SL7 3DR Fax: 01228 573322 Tel: 01494 443737 Email: [email protected] Cessna 152 5 Fax: 01494 465456 Website: www.carlisle-flight-training.com Cessna 172 1 BERKSHIRE Email: [email protected] PA28R Arrow 1 Piper Tomahawk 2 West London Aero Club Website: www.wycombeaircentre.co.uk PA28 Warrior 1 Piper Warrior
    [Show full text]
  • A303 Stonehenge Preliminary Environmental Information Report
    A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Preliminary Environmental Information Report February 2018 A303 Stonehenge – Amesbury to Berwick Down Preliminary Environmental Information Report Table of Contents Chapter Pages 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Overview and need for the proposed scheme 7 1.2 The purpose of the report 7 1.3 Legislative and policy framework 8 1.4 The Applicant 10 1.5 Stakeholder engagement 10 1.6 Structure of this PEI Report 11 1.7 The EIA team 13 1.8 Next steps 13 2 The Proposed Scheme 15 2.1 Project location 15 2.2 Description of the proposed scheme 15 2.3 Construction 25 3 Assessment of Alternatives 31 3.1 Scheme history 31 3.2 Selection of the proposed scheme 31 3.3 Development of the proposed scheme 34 3.4 Appraisal of options presented for consultation 35 4 Environmental Assessment Methodology 40 4.1 General approach 40 4.2 Study area and site boundary 41 4.3 Existing baseline and future conditions 42 4.4 Potential significant effects and mitigation 42 4.5 Major events 46 4.6 Human health 47 5 Air Quality 49 5.1 Introduction 49 5.2 Stakeholder engagement 49 5.3 Assessment assumptions and limitations 50 5.4 Study area 51 5.5 Baseline conditions 52 5.6 Potential impacts 55 5.7 Design, mitigation and enhancement measures 56 5.8 Assessment of effects 57 3 A303 Stonehenge – Amesbury to Berwick Down Preliminary Environmental Information Report 5.9 Corridors for utility connections 61 6 Cultural Heritage 62 6.1 Introduction 62 6.2 Stakeholder engagement 62 6.3 Assessment assumptions and limitations 63 6.4 Study area 63 6.5 Baseline
    [Show full text]
  • From 4 February 2019
    from 4 February 2019 Salisbury | Idmiston | Shipton Bellinger via Laverstock - The Winterbournes - East Gomeldon - Porton - Porton Down route 66 Mondays to Fridays except public holidays St X67 sch hols sch hols Wilton Road Skew Bridge 0710 Bemerton Heath Sarum Academy 0713 Roman Road Cemetery 0719 Devizes Road Highbury Avenue 0720 0716 Bemerton Heath The Valley 0721 Westwood Road Sarum Academy 0726 Skew Bridge 0733 Salisbury Rail Station Forecourt 0741 0741 0825 Endless Street stop C 0726 0747 0747 0820 0830 0915 1015 1115 1215 1315 1415 1515 1515 Shady Bower Flats 0751 0751 CR 0834 0919 1019 1119 1219 1319 1419 1519 1519 St Mark's Church London Road 0730 CR Laverstock The Green 0755 0755 CR 0837 0922 1022 1122 1222 1322 1422 1522 1522 Laverstock Schools Grounds 0759 CR 1524 Winterbourne Gunner Policemans Corner 0740 0814 0814 CR 0845 0931 1031 1131 1231 1331 1431 1533 1531 East Gomeldon Arch CR 0934 1034 1134 1234 1334 1434 1536 1534 Porton Targett’s Corner CR 0848 Porton Chapman’s Corner (Garage) 0744 0818 0818 0838 0850 Porton Down Entrance arrive 0750 0823 0823 0843 0855 Porton Down Entrance depart 0751 0825 0825 0900 Porton Chapman’s Corner (Idmiston Road) 0756 0830 0830 0905 0937 1037 1137 1237 1337 1437 1539 1537 Idmiston Horefield 0757 0831 0831 0906 0938 1038 1138 1238 1338 1438 R 1538 Idmiston Bridge 0800 0835 0835 0910 0940 1040 1140 1240 1340 1440 R 1540 Allington Westside 0856 1546 Newton Toney Beechfield Corner Cholderton Memorial 0902 Shipton Bellinger St Peter's Close 0906 Shipton Bellinger Muscott Close 0909 Tidworth
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Berliand Flew Martin’S Beech Duchess from Redhill to Iceland for the Journey of a Lifetime
    April 2015 AIRCRAFT AOPA OWNER & PILOT The official magazine of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association GA gets a new strategic plan Flying a Duchess to Iceland How to get a drone licence Lee-on-Solent opens new runway Fly a Spitfire! 2 AIRCRAFT Chairman’s Message OWNER &PILOT Changing Times April 2015 By George Done Editor: Ian Sheppard [email protected] Tel. +44 (0) 7759 455770 In the February issue of General Published by: Aviation I was pleased to announce First Aerospace Media Ltd and welcome Ian Sheppard as the Hangar 9 Redhill Aerodrome Redhill RH1 5JY new editor of the AOPA UK house Tel. +44 (0) 1737 821409 magazine. Ian has taken over from Pat Malone who held the reins for Advertising Office: nearly thirteen years, and contributed AOPA UK hugely to the image and wellbeing of The British Light Aviation Centre the association. 50A Cambridge Street London Sw1V 4QQ When Pat took over the Tel. +44 (0) 20 7834 5631 opportunity was taken to move to bi- monthly publication from quarterly being non-EASA (Annex II) types, Head of Advertising: David Impey and change the title from Light with most being used for private Tel. +44 (0) 7742 605338 Aviation to General Aviation. purposes, this definition covering In the same way, the opportunity use for business reasons and also for Printing: Holbrooks Printers Ltd has been taken with Ian’s editorship recreational and sporting use, as for Articles, photographs and news to take stock and introduce a new a private car. items from AOPA members and other look to the magazine that better A significant proportion of owners readers are welcomed.
    [Show full text]
  • Idmiston, Porton & Gomeldon Village Design Statement
    IDMISTON, PORTON & GOMELDON VILLAGE DESIGN STATEMENT RETAINING OUR RURAL FEEL Our Village Design Statement was financed by Produced by our Village Design Team March 2013 This document contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Cover Photo: Fingers of agricultural land spill into our villages – water meadows between The Avenue and Idmiston Road, Porton FOREWORD by John Glen MP for Salisbury I am delighted that the villages of Idmiston, Porton and Gomeldon have become the latest parish in this constituency to turn their thoughts to the preparation of a village design statement, setting out the community’s aspirations for the future. The fantastic response rate and obvious willingness of the community to engage with the process demonstrates how much people love and value the character and amenities of their villages and how much already exists that is worth fighting to preserve and enhance. I think the preference for small developments and a good mix of properties and the emphasis on minimising noise and light pollution from any future developments at Porton Down together form a very strong basis for future community inputs into the planning process because they demonstrate that your collective approach is founded on realism. This statement does not seek to preserve the villages in aspic but identifies sensible and achievable ways to make sure that they remain attractive and peaceful places to live. By working together, the three villages have both strengthened the ideas that you have in common and underlined the importance of preserving the individuality of each community by retaining the green spaces that divide them.
    [Show full text]
  • A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Technical Appraisal Report Volume 5 Appendix D Initial Route Option Assessment (Design Fix C)
    A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Technical Appraisal Report Volume 5 Appendix D Initial route option assessment (Design Fix C) Public Consultation 2017 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 Appendix D Initial route option assessment (Design Fix C) A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 D.1 Initial route option assessment (Design Fix C) A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 Appendix D: Initial route options assessment (Design Fix C) 1 Introduction The Initial Corridors Appraisal in Design Fix A recommended Corridor D and Corridor F as the preferred corridors for development and assessment of route options for the new improvement scheme. As part of Design Fix B, ten route options have then been developed for the two Corridors, informed by the previous studies that have been undertaken for the scheme. However three of the ten route options utilised a 4.5km long tunnel under the WHS. All three options were assessed to generate scheme capital costs in the region of £2 Billion which significantly exceeded the scheme budget and were immediately rejected on affordability grounds. The methodology used to appraise the remaining seven route options developed within the preferred Corridors D and F, follows on from that used for the Initial Corridors Appraisal in Design Fix A, and consists of the Transport Business Case Five Case Model criteria using the Option Assessment Framework contained within the Web-based Transport Analysis Guidance (WebTAG) Transport Appraisal Process. The more detailed assessment methodologies and the assessments of the Corridor D and the Corridor F route options are detailed below. These are based on the Transport Business Case Five Case Model criteria and use the Option Assessment Framework contained within the WebTAG Transport Appraisal Process.
    [Show full text]
  • Punch List” of Key Terms and Research Strategies for the Essay Paper
    Researching Transcript Terms Research Tasks for Class & Media Lab Work Objective: to develop a “punch list” of key terms and research strategies for the essay paper. Hopefully, your terms are spelled correctly. If not, use a dictionary or Google search. Use the Punch List Form as a check list for what needs to be looked up, where items are located, and to keep track of sources once they have been found. More detailed information is found in the OHP Manual on FirstClass. [Noodle tools or 2007 Word will help you with the bibliography later. For the technically skilled, use the „references‟ tab in Word to work with managing sources, to follow the Chicago Manual of style, or to insert citations or endnotes. You will receive guidance on this in class, too.] Three Step Process Step 1 Identification: skim through your transcript to the most interesting or anecdotal sections. Highlight all words that relate to a) potentially a famous person, b) location of battle or battle event, c) specific types of aircraft/ships/transportation, d) military acronyms, or e) other. Step 2 – Ask probing questions and then locate useful and accurate information. Step 3 – Record and cite the sources correctly. “Learn by Doing” Step 1: Highlight by color-coding all important known and unknown terms; ID possible additional terms of interest. Comment [kwl1]: General questions for research based on terms in the transcript. Do not bother with Step 2: What questions should be asked? See review notes on the side of page for examples. items that are too generic or too broad (see examples below) Do this electronically with your own transcript.
    [Show full text]
  • Idmiston, Porton & Gomeldon Village Design Statement
    IDMISTON, PORTON & GOMELDON VILLAGE DESIGN STATEMENT RETAINING OUR RURAL FEEL Our Village Design Statement was financed by Produced by our Village Design Team March 2013 This document contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Cover Photo: Fingers of agricultural land spill into our villages – water meadows between The Avenue and Idmiston Road, Porton FOREWORD by John Glen MP for Salisbury I am delighted that the villages of Idmiston, Porton and Gomeldon have become the latest parish in this constituency to turn their thoughts to the preparation of a village design statement, setting out the community’s aspirations for the future. The fantastic response rate and obvious willingness of the community to engage with the process demonstrates how much people love and value the character and amenities of their villages and how much already exists that is worth fighting to preserve and enhance. I think the preference for small developments and a good mix of properties and the emphasis on minimising noise and light pollution from any future developments at Porton Down together form a very strong basis for future community inputs into the planning process because they demonstrate that your collective approach is founded on realism. This statement does not seek to preserve the villages in aspic but identifies sensible and achievable ways to make sure that they remain attractive and peaceful places to live. By working together, the three villages have both strengthened the ideas that you have in common and underlined the importance of preserving the individuality of each community by retaining the green spaces that divide them.
    [Show full text]