DOCSLIB.ORG

A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Technical Appraisal Report Volume 3 Appendix B Initial Corridors Appraisal (Design Fix A)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Technical Appraisal Report Volume 3 Appendix B Initial corridors appraisal (Design Fix A) Public Consultation 2017 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 Appendix B Initial corridors appraisal (Design Fix A) A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 B.1 Historical routes A360 LONGBARROW ROUNDABOUT A345 COUNTESS A3028 ROUNDABOUT DURRINGTON LARKHILL SHREWTON A303 B3086 A3028 STONEHENGE WINTERBOURNE STOKE RIVER TILL RIVER A303 AMESBURY YARNBURY CASTLE BERWICK DOWN A303 BERWICK ST JAMES BOSCOMBE DOWN AIRFIELD A345 A360 RIVER AVON A36 STAPLEFORD UPPER WOODFORD MIDDLE WOODFORD LOWER WOODFORD SALISBURY Kilometres 0 4.5 9 This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. CLIENT NAME: Highways England LICENCE NUMBER: 100030649 [2016] © Historic England [2016]. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right [2016] The Historic England GIS Data contained in this material was obtained in 2016. The most publicly available up to date Historic England GIS Data can be obtained from HistoricEngland.org.uk. Drawing Status Suitability Project Title LEGEND 2004 Berkley-Matthews SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL 1991_1993 S1 1991_1993 N1 1999-Winterbourne FIT FOR INTERNAL REVIEW AMND COMMENT S3 A303 AMESBURY TO BERWICK DOWN Route 2006 Northern Route INFORMATION 1991_1993 S1(B) 1991_1993 N2 Stoke Bypass In addition to the hazards/risks normally associated with the types of work 2004 Jackson Route AR2 2006 Southern Route Client Drawing Title 1991_1993 S1- 1991_1993 N4 1999-2km Tunnel Cut detailed on this drawing, note the following significant residual risks 2004 Lawrence Alternative 2015 2.5km Tunnel (Reference shall also be made in the design hazard log) S1(A)-S1(B) and Cover HISTORICAL ROUTES 1991_1993 W1 AR10 Construction 2003 Southern 2015 2.9km Tunnel 1991_1993 S2-S2(A) 1991_1993 W2 2006 Alternative Route FNR1 None Alternative Route 2015 Andy Rhind-Tutt 1991_1993 S2-S2(B) 1991_1993 W4 2006 Alternative Route FSR1 2004 Alternative Route 1 Alternative Maintenance / Cleaning 1991-1993 E1 1991_1993 W5 2006 Alternative Route FSR2 Scale Designed / Drawn Checked Approved Authorised 2004 Alternative Route 2 2015 Offline Dualling None 1:100,000 FG GS SL SH 1991_1993 E2 1991_1993 W6 2006 Alternative Route FSR3 to North 2004 Alternative Route 3 Designers Original Size Date Date Date Date 1991_1993 E3 1994 Purple Route 2006 Alternative Route NSR1 Use 2004 Alternative Route 4 Option 9 A3 07/11/16 07/11/16 07/11/16 07/11/16 1991-1993 E4 1994 Purple Variant 2006 Alternative Route NSR3 None 2004 Alternative Route 7 Option 13 Drawing Number Revison 1991_1993 E5 Route 2006 Alternative Route NSR4 Option 19 Proje ct Origin ato r Volu me Case Route Decommission / Demolition 1991_1993 E6 P04 FINAL ISSUE HE551506-AA-GEN- 1998 Previous 2006 Alternative Route NSR5 Option 20 07/11/16 FG GS SL P04 2004 Aubrey Alternative None SWI-DR-CX-000018 1991_1993 E7 Options Considered Rev Date Description By Chk'd App'd AR1 AR5 AR8 AR9 2003 Published Scheme Location Typ e Ro le Nu mb er A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 B.2 Corridors identified A360 LONGBARROW ROUNDABOUT A345 COUNTESS A3028 ROUNDABOUT DURRINGTON LARKHILL SHREWTON A303 A3028 STONEHENGE WINTERBOURNE STOKE RIVER TILL RIVER A303 AMESBURY YARNBURY CASTLE BERWICK DOWN A303 BERWICK ST JAMES A345 A360 RIVER AVON A36 STAPLEFORD UPPER WOODFORD MIDDLE WOODFORD LOWER WOODFORD SALISBURY Kilometres 0 4.5 9 This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. CLIENT NAME: Highways England LICENCE NUMBER: 100030649 [2016] © Historic England [2016]. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right [2016] The Historic England GIS Data contained in this material was obtained in 2016. The most publicly available up to date Historic England GIS Data can be obtained from HistoricEngland.org.uk. Drawing Status Suitability Project Title LEGEND SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL FIT FOR INTERNAL REVIEW AND COMMENT S3 A303 AMESBURY TO BERWICK DOWN HISTORICAL ROUTES CORRIDOR E ROUTES SOUTH OF INFORMATION A303 (INSIDE WHS) In addition to the hazards/risks normally associated with the types of work Client Drawing Title CORRIDOR A ROUTE NORTH OF detailed on this drawing, note the following significant residual risks (Reference shall also be made in the design hazard log) A303 (OUTSIDE WHS) CORRIDOR F ROUTES SOUTH OF CORRIDORS IDENTIFIED A303 (OUTSIDE WHS) AND NORTH Construction CORRIDOR B ROUTES NORTH OF OF SALISBURY None A303 (INSIDE WHS) CORRIDOR G ROUTE SOUTH OF Maintenance / Cleaning CORRIDOR C AT GRADE ROUTES Scale Designed / Drawn Checked Approved Authorised A303 (OUTSIDE WHS) AND SOUTH None 1:100,000 AH GS SL SH WITHIN 1.0KM OF A303 (INSIDE OF SALISBURY WHS) Designers Original Size Date Date Date Date Use A3 04/11/16 04/11/16 04/11/16 04/11/16 WORLD HERITAGE SITE None CORRIDOR D TUNNEL ROUTES Drawing Number Revision (INSIDE WHS) Project Originator Volume Decommission / Demolition P05 27/10/16 FINAL ISSUE AH GS SL HE551506-AA-GEN- P05 None SWI-DR-CX-000015 Rev Date Description By Chk'd App'd Location Type Role Number A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 B.3 Environmental assessment methodology and scoring assessment A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 Appendix B3: Environmental assessment methodology and scoring Strategic policies and aims Indicative rating values a) Highways England Licence (HEL) b) Road Investment Strategy (RIS) NPSNN – Decision Relevant client objectives / Environmental Topic Performance Approach to assessment Specification making requirements receptors Red Amber Green c) Highways England criteria Delivery Plan (HEDP), d) Highways England Strategic Business Plan (HESBP) Geographical Information Systems (GIS) data and Substantial harm Less than No harm to; or Stonehenge, Avebury analysis of route corridors, considering the to the Outstanding substantial harm benefits for, the and Associated Sites Cultural heritage: to potential harm or benefit to the fabric (including Universal Value to the OUV of OUV of the World Heritage Site contribute to the conservation buried archaeology), setting and character of the (OUV) of the WHS WHS probable. WHS. (Stonehenge WHS) and enhancement of the WHS probable. HEDP: Commits to enacting World Heritage Site by conservation measures at improving access both within GIS data and analysis of route corridors, Substantial harm Less than No harm to those identified heritage assets and to the site. considering potential harm or benefit to the fabric to one or more substantial harm any, or less most at risk by end of this Scheduled Monuments and setting of SMs. SMs probable. to multiple SMs than substantial Road Period, and reviewing Environment and (SMs) probable. harm to a Historic Paras 5.128- the influence of the network on community: to contribute to limited number Environment 138 the setting and condition of the the enhancement of the of SMs. historic environment close to historic landscape within the World Heritage Site, to GIS data and analysis of route corridors, Substantial harm Less than No harm to, or the network, identifying and considering potential harm or benefit to the fabric to one or more substantial harm less than improve biodiversity along the Designated Assets: delivering enhancement and setting of Listed Buildings, Conservation designated assets to multiple substantial Route and to provide a Listed Buildings, opportunities. Areas and Registered Parks and Gardens. probable. designated assets Harm to a positive legacy to Conservation Areas probable. limited number, communities adjoining the and Registered Parks of designated road. and Gardens assets probable. GIS mapping of International and National Habitat loss or Immediately In excess of RIS: - biodiversity is one of 2 International Designations across the broad study area and severance. adjacent/ within 200m from Key Performance Indicators Designation (Special analysis of route corridors against these features Potential for 200m for air such (KPIs) identified for Reference Area of Conservation to determine likely habitat loss, severance or significant adverse quality and noise designations. Period 1 (RP1); sets an (SAC) / Special indirect effects. 200m is considered an effects to occur. reasons or clearly aspiration that the operation, Environment and Protection Area (SPA) appropriate buffer distance for considering indirect connected maintenance, and community: to improve / Ramsar and effects at this stage, and is based on DMRB hydrologically. enhancement of the Strategic biodiversity along the Route. candidate SAC / guidance for assessing air quality effects on Potential for Road Network (SRN) should potential SPA / protected sites (SSSIs, SACs, SPAs); additionally, adverse effects to move to a position that delivers Expansion on headline potential Ramsar) no net loss of biodiversity. requirements - whilst effects vary with individual ecological occur. And, in the long term, the receptors, this distance is likely to cover the Habitat loss or Immediately In excess of • Biodiversity within new majority of other indirect impacts such as (but not Company should deliver a net Paras
Recommended publications
  • Addendum to School Places Strategy 2017-2022 – Explanation of the Differences Between Wiltshire Community Areas and Wiltshire School Planning Areas

    Addendum to School Places Strategy 2017-2022 – Explanation of the Differences Between Wiltshire Community Areas and Wiltshire School Planning Areas

    Addendum to School Places Strategy 2017-2022 – Explanation of the differences between Wiltshire Community Areas and Wiltshire School Planning Areas This document should be read in conjunction with the School Places Strategy 2017 – 2022 and provides an explanation of the differences between the Wiltshire Community Areas served by the Area Boards and the School Planning Areas. The Strategy is primarily a school place planning tool which, by necessity, is written from the perspective of the School Planning Areas. A School Planning Area (SPA) is defined as the area(s) served by a Secondary School and therefore includes all primary schools in the towns and surrounding villages which feed into that secondary school. As these areas can differ from the community areas, this addendum is a reference tool to aid interested parties from the Community Area/Area Board to define which SPA includes the schools covered by their Community Area. It is therefore written from the Community Area standpoint. Amesbury The Amesbury Community Area and Area Board covers Amesbury town and surrounding parishes of Tilshead, Orcheston, Shrewton, Figheldean, Netheravon, Enford, Durrington (including Larkhill), Milston, Bulford, Cholderton, Wilsford & Lake, The Woodfords and Great Durnford. It encompasses the secondary schools The Stonehenge School in Amesbury and Avon Valley College in Durrington and includes primary schools which feed into secondary provision in the Community Areas of Durrington, Lavington and Salisbury. However, the School Planning Area (SPA) is based on the area(s) served by the Secondary Schools and covers schools in the towns and surrounding villages which feed into either The Stonehenge School in Amesbury or Avon Valley College in Durrington.

  • Army Basing Salisbury Plan Planning Applications New SFA Exhibition Banners

    Army Basing - Salisbury Plain Planning Applications 1 Introduction Government announcements The Army Basing Plan announced on 5th March 2013 confirmed Salisbury Plain as a major focus of the Reaction Force element of Army 2020. For further details on the wider programme visit: www.gov.uk/government/consultations/salisbury-plain- training-area-master-plan-army-basing-programme. The Government has committed up to £800 million to be invested in the Salisbury Plain area. The planned changes In total there will be approximately 7,700 people moving to the Salisbury Plain area comprising 4,300 additional service personnel plus their families. To provide the necessary infrastructure the key elements of the Masterplan for the Army Basing Programme are: • Extensive new construction and refurbishment of existing buildings within the existing base perimeter for: • Single living accommodation (SLA), with dining, catering, recreational and welfare facilities; and • Technical accommodation, including workshops, garages, armouries, stores and offices. • Outside the existing base perimeter there will be changes to the training area; and • 1,017 new houses for Service Family Accommodation (SFA); 444 in Larkhill; 246 in Ludgershall; 227 in Bulford; and 100 purchased in Tidworth. The Salisbury Plain Masterplan In 2014 a Salisbury Plain Masterplan was prepared to illustrate the necessary changes to existing infrastructure to serve the needs of this larger community of Army personnel and service families. The Masterplan, together with the supporting Environmental Report, sets the planning framework for the development of each site identified. Planning applications Over the past few months, proposals for a number of sites identified in the Masterplan - Bulford, Ludgershall and Larkhill - have been developed.
  • Salisbury Plain 0 0

    Salisbury Plain 0 0

    400000 402500 405000 407500 410000 412500 415000 Wilsford URCHFONT Charlton St Peter Rushall Eastcott Easterton 0 0 SALISBURY PLAIN 0 0 0 UPAVON 0 5 5 5 5 1 1 WILTSHIRE Ridgeway Corridor MARKET Map 4 LAVINGTON R Resulting Access Network iv e r A v Training Area Extent o n WEST C Impact Area e LAVINGTON n East t r a Casterley Chisenbury Danger Areas l 0 0 0 R Information 0 5 5 a 2 2 5 R n Point 5 Larkhill Perimeter Route 1 o g 1 u e (minimum Bridleway status) t e IMPACT R AREA Flag Free 2 o 9 a d Larkhill Perimeter Route (Byway) Compton Subject to Flag Littlecott Proposed Great Stones Way Proposed Re-Routing of Trans-Wilts Bridleway ENFORD Byway ! ! Restricted Byway Bridleway Footpath 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 1 1 Rights of Way supplied by Wiltshire Council A This map is for information purposes only. 3 The document should not be regarded as a copy of the 6 Fittleton 0 definitive map and must not be used as a true legal record. For further information regarding definitive rights of way please contact Wiltshire County Council. NETHERAVON Scale 1:50,000 The scale ratio stated is accurate when reproduced A at A3 size by Geospatial Services South. Any other 3 TILSHEAD DANGER AREA 4 reproduction by conventional or electronic means, 5 e.g. printing from a PDF, may alter the scale of the DANGER AREA Westdown map. Please check the dimensions of the grid to Camp confirm any change in scale before taking measurements.
  • Newton Tony CE VC Primary School

    Newton Tony CE VC Primary School

    Newton Tony CE VC Primary School Admissions Arrangements 2018-2019 Policy agreed November 2017 Policy review September 2018 This policy applies solely to applications for places at Voluntary Controlled (VC) and Community (C) Primary, Infant and Junior Schools. Foundation (F), Voluntary Aided schools (VA) and Academies (A) are their own admissions authorities and the governing bodies are responsible for determining their own procedures and policies. Determined arrangements for the co-ordination of primary admissions are drafted with the determined co-ordinated admissions scheme 2018/19. The application round for entry into Reception 2018 and Junior Year 3 entry opens on 1 September 2017. The deadline date for applications to be received is midnight on 15 January 2018. The home address given for the child must be the address where the child is resident as of the deadline date. Designated Area A designated area is a discrete geographical zone served by a school. The address that determines a child’s designated area is the place where s/he is ordinarily resident with his/her parent(s) or legal guardian(s) for the majority of the school week. Most schools have a discrete designated area but some addresses fall within areas shared by two or more schools. Children living outside the county boundary are treated as if the children live within Wiltshire but outside the designated area for the school(s) in question. For admission criterion purposes, the address used for Bargees, will be the sorting office or main post office address, closest to the place of mooring as of the deadline date.
  • Table 1 - Original Proposals for Changes to Contracted Bus Services to Achieve Savings*

    Table 1 - Original Proposals for Changes to Contracted Bus Services to Achieve Savings*

    Table 1 - Original proposals for changes to contracted bus services to achieve savings* Service Route Original proposal Reason for proposal Reduction in Saturday service to 2 hourly (operationally linked to X2 20 Marlborough - Bedwyn - Hungerford 2-hourly service sufficient to meet demand proposal as uses the same vehicle) Withdrawal of Saturday "shoppers" bus service from Marlborough to Non-essential service - most users have alternative buses to other large X2 Marlborough - Froxfield - Hungerford - Newbury Newbury (operationally linked to service 20 proposal as uses the same towns. vehicle) Non-essential service - most users have alternative buses to other large X76 Marlborough - Calne - Bromham - Bath Withdrawal of daily "shoppers" bus service from Marlboro' to Bath towns. 30 Malmesbury Town Service Reduction in frequency of local town service around Malmesbury to hourly Hourly service still available 33 / X33 Chippenham & Calne to Devizes Reduce service after 4pm on weekdays to hourly Hourly service still available Warminster local services (including to Sutton 50,54,57 Withdraw Warminster local services on Saturday afternoons after 2pm. Low usage at these times Veney and the Deverills Withdrawal of Wednesday "shoppers" bus service from Chapmanslade to 51 Frome - Chapmanslade - Warminster Very low usage (almost nil) Warminster Cirencester - Ashton Keynes - Cricklade - High cost per passenger, and low use by Wiltshire residents. Other 51A Withdrawal of Sunday service Swindon contributing authorities expected to withdraw financial support
  • Army Basing Newsletter – February 2018

    Army Basing Newsletter – February 2018

    Army Basing Newsletter – February 2018 This publication aims to regularly update you on the Army Basing Programme (ABP) announced in 2013 stating some 4,000 additional Service personnel plus their families would relocate to Salisbury Plain by 2020. Wiltshire Council Visit to Perham Down: The MOD Army Basing Team invited Baroness Scott of Bybrook, OBE, Leader of Wiltshire Council, local Wiltshire councillors, the Corporate Director for Growth, Investment and Place (Alistair Cunningham) together with the local Community Engagement Manager (Marc Read) to see recent development at Perham Down on 18 January. In addition, General Wardlaw (Director of Basing and Infrastructure), Mark Duddy (ABP Programme Director) and Allan Thomson (Aspire’s Chief Executive) provided a briefing on the scale and development of the £1billion programme, which is on track to deliver facilities inside and outside ‘the wire’ within the required 2020 timescale. The party also drove through the recently completed Ashdown Housing Estate in Tidworth. Construction Programme: Construction work continues at pace on garrisons (Tidworth, Larkhill, Bulford and Perham Down). As reported previously, many new buildings, extensions and refurbishments are underway or have been completed. Additionally, the school build programme required for the increased military population is well established with St Michael’s Primary School at Larkhill now very prominent on the landscape. Planning permission to extend the Avon Valley College at Durrington was granted, on 11 October 2017. Planning applications for the new school at Ludgershall and extending Wellington Academy were submitted on 1st December 2017 and 8th January 2018 respectively. The tenders for these two schools are due to be returned in mid-April 18, so that all places will be available in August 2019, in good time for the arrival of the Army units arriving in the summer of 2019.
  • Needs Analysis for Wiltshire and Swindon

    Needs Analysis for Wiltshire and Swindon

    Needs Analysis for Wiltshire and Swindon January 2021 Contents Population profile ..................................................................................................... 4 Deprivation ............................................................................................................. 19 Economy ................................................................................................................. 42 Education, skills and training ................................................................................. 49 Health, wellbeing and disability ........................................................................... 64 Housing ................................................................................................................... 82 Children and young people ................................................................................. 91 Older people ........................................................................................................ 114 Community strength ............................................................................................ 125 Accessibility and isolation ................................................................................... 137 Covid-19 ................................................................................................................ 150 Appendix A – Indicators used in this report ....................................................... 167 2 Needs Analysis for Wiltshire and Swindon 2021 Introduction This report,
  • Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites

    Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites

    World Heritage 41 COM Patrimoine mondial Paris, 27 June / 27 juin 2017 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE / COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Forty-first session / Quarante-et-unième session Krakow, Poland / Cracovie, Pologne 2-12 July 2017 / 2-12 juillet 2017 Item 7 of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List and/or on the List of World Heritage in Danger Point 7 de l’Ordre du jour provisoire: Etat de conservation de biens inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial et/ou sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril MISSION REPORT / RAPPORT DE MISSION Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) (373bis) Stonehenge, Avebury et sites associés (Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d'Irlande du Nord) (373bis) 31 January – 3 February 2017 Report on the joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated sites 31 January – 3 February 2017 Table of contents Executive Summary 1. Introductory Statements 1.1 Acknowledgments 1.2. Aims and mandate of the February 2017 Mission 2. Context and background 2.1 Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) 2.2 Summary 1st Mission recommendations (October 2015 – report April 2016). 2.3 Reactions by the civil society 2.4 Governance and consensus building among heritage bodies 3. Responses by the SP to the recommendations of the first Mission - April 2016 3.1 Willingness to respond 3.2 Issues of archaeological organisation and quality control 3.3 Issue of visitor numbers and behaviour 4.
  • Larkhill Medical & Dental Facility

    Larkhill Medical & Dental Facility

    Aspire Defence Capital Works Army Basing Programme 2020 Landscape and Visual Study: Larkhill Medical & Dental Facility (ROGGEN) January 2016 Document No: 27-ROGGEN-43-RT-L1-001 Rev A Document Status Rev. Date Purpose of Issue Prep. Chkd. Appr. O 15.01.16 Draft for Discussion RJC TFT DAG A 19.06.17 For Planning RJC TFT DAG CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Methodology 3.0 Planning Policy 4.0 Elements of the Landscape 5.0 Landscape Character 6.0 Visual Amenity 7.0 Mitigation 8.0 Conclusion APPENDICES Appendix A – National Character Area Appendix B – Salisbury District Landscape Character Assessment FIGURES Figure 1* Landscape Constraints Figure 2* Landscape Context Figure 3* Topography Figure 4 Receptor Viewpoint Locations Figure 5 Receptor Viewpoint Photography Figure 6 Illustrative Building Proposals Figure 7 Visibility Matrix * reproduced from Landscape and Visual Appraisal, Capita June 2015, Document No: 27- XXXGEN-43-RT-L1-001 Aspire Defence Capital Works – Landscape & Visual Study – Larkhill Medical & Dental ROGGEN 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 Wiltshire’s landscape has been intensively used by the military for well over a century. Salisbury Plain is one of the largest training areas in the UK. 1.1.2 A hybrid planning application for the masterplan proposals for delivery of the Army Basing Programme (ABP) 2020 at MoD Larkhill has recently been submitted, as has a detailed application for the development of two messes and single living accommodation on the northern area of the camp. This draft report describes the landscape and visual effects of a proposed further development of a medical and dental facility (the scheme), which would replace an existing, smaller building that currently occupies part of the site.
  • A303 Stonehenge Preliminary Environmental Information Report

    A303 Stonehenge Preliminary Environmental Information Report

    A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Preliminary Environmental Information Report February 2018 A303 Stonehenge – Amesbury to Berwick Down Preliminary Environmental Information Report Table of Contents Chapter Pages 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Overview and need for the proposed scheme 7 1.2 The purpose of the report 7 1.3 Legislative and policy framework 8 1.4 The Applicant 10 1.5 Stakeholder engagement 10 1.6 Structure of this PEI Report 11 1.7 The EIA team 13 1.8 Next steps 13 2 The Proposed Scheme 15 2.1 Project location 15 2.2 Description of the proposed scheme 15 2.3 Construction 25 3 Assessment of Alternatives 31 3.1 Scheme history 31 3.2 Selection of the proposed scheme 31 3.3 Development of the proposed scheme 34 3.4 Appraisal of options presented for consultation 35 4 Environmental Assessment Methodology 40 4.1 General approach 40 4.2 Study area and site boundary 41 4.3 Existing baseline and future conditions 42 4.4 Potential significant effects and mitigation 42 4.5 Major events 46 4.6 Human health 47 5 Air Quality 49 5.1 Introduction 49 5.2 Stakeholder engagement 49 5.3 Assessment assumptions and limitations 50 5.4 Study area 51 5.5 Baseline conditions 52 5.6 Potential impacts 55 5.7 Design, mitigation and enhancement measures 56 5.8 Assessment of effects 57 3 A303 Stonehenge – Amesbury to Berwick Down Preliminary Environmental Information Report 5.9 Corridors for utility connections 61 6 Cultural Heritage 62 6.1 Introduction 62 6.2 Stakeholder engagement 62 6.3 Assessment assumptions and limitations 63 6.4 Study area 63 6.5 Baseline
  • A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Technical Appraisal Report Volume 5 Appendix D Initial Route Option Assessment (Design Fix C)

    A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Technical Appraisal Report Volume 5 Appendix D Initial Route Option Assessment (Design Fix C)

    A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down Technical Appraisal Report Volume 5 Appendix D Initial route option assessment (Design Fix C) Public Consultation 2017 A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 Appendix D Initial route option assessment (Design Fix C) A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 D.1 Initial route option assessment (Design Fix C) A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down | HE551506 Appendix D: Initial route options assessment (Design Fix C) 1 Introduction The Initial Corridors Appraisal in Design Fix A recommended Corridor D and Corridor F as the preferred corridors for development and assessment of route options for the new improvement scheme. As part of Design Fix B, ten route options have then been developed for the two Corridors, informed by the previous studies that have been undertaken for the scheme. However three of the ten route options utilised a 4.5km long tunnel under the WHS. All three options were assessed to generate scheme capital costs in the region of £2 Billion which significantly exceeded the scheme budget and were immediately rejected on affordability grounds. The methodology used to appraise the remaining seven route options developed within the preferred Corridors D and F, follows on from that used for the Initial Corridors Appraisal in Design Fix A, and consists of the Transport Business Case Five Case Model criteria using the Option Assessment Framework contained within the Web-based Transport Analysis Guidance (WebTAG) Transport Appraisal Process. The more detailed assessment methodologies and the assessments of the Corridor D and the Corridor F route options are detailed below. These are based on the Transport Business Case Five Case Model criteria and use the Option Assessment Framework contained within the WebTAG Transport Appraisal Process.
  • Annex B – Conditions Relating to Licensed Badger Control On

    Annex B – Conditions Relating to Licensed Badger Control On

    Licence Annex B: Provisions relating to licensed actions on or around Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), Special Protection Areas (SPAs), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), and/or Ramsar sites within the county of Wiltshire SSSI name European Licence condition Designated Site name (where applicable) Acres Farm All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of Meadow traps to existing sett footprint. Delay access until after hay cut, mid- July. Baverstock All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of Juniper Bank traps to existing sett footprint. SSSI Bencroft Hill All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of Meadows traps to existing sett footprint. Delay access until after hay cut, mid- July. Bentley Wood All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of SSSI traps to existing sett footprint. Any decaying wood located within the sett footprint is to be left in situ if possible. If decaying wood must be moved then it should be moved no further than is necessary. Bincknoll Dip All vehicles must be restricted to existing surfaced tracks. Limit Woods location of traps to existing sett footprint within the woodland areas of the SSSI only and ideally in the conifer area. Traps should only be dug in, on boundary edges in these areas, such as hedgerows. Blackmoor All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of Copse SSSI traps to existing sett footprint. Botley Down All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of SSSI traps to existing sett footprint. Bowerchalke No activities from 1st March to 31st August to avoid bird breeding Downs season.