Circular Route from Durrington Walls to Stonehenge
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Addendum to School Places Strategy 2017-2022 – Explanation of the Differences Between Wiltshire Community Areas and Wiltshire School Planning Areas
Addendum to School Places Strategy 2017-2022 – Explanation of the differences between Wiltshire Community Areas and Wiltshire School Planning Areas This document should be read in conjunction with the School Places Strategy 2017 – 2022 and provides an explanation of the differences between the Wiltshire Community Areas served by the Area Boards and the School Planning Areas. The Strategy is primarily a school place planning tool which, by necessity, is written from the perspective of the School Planning Areas. A School Planning Area (SPA) is defined as the area(s) served by a Secondary School and therefore includes all primary schools in the towns and surrounding villages which feed into that secondary school. As these areas can differ from the community areas, this addendum is a reference tool to aid interested parties from the Community Area/Area Board to define which SPA includes the schools covered by their Community Area. It is therefore written from the Community Area standpoint. Amesbury The Amesbury Community Area and Area Board covers Amesbury town and surrounding parishes of Tilshead, Orcheston, Shrewton, Figheldean, Netheravon, Enford, Durrington (including Larkhill), Milston, Bulford, Cholderton, Wilsford & Lake, The Woodfords and Great Durnford. It encompasses the secondary schools The Stonehenge School in Amesbury and Avon Valley College in Durrington and includes primary schools which feed into secondary provision in the Community Areas of Durrington, Lavington and Salisbury. However, the School Planning Area (SPA) is based on the area(s) served by the Secondary Schools and covers schools in the towns and surrounding villages which feed into either The Stonehenge School in Amesbury or Avon Valley College in Durrington. -
The University of Bradford Institutional Repository
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bradford Scholars The University of Bradford Institutional Repository http://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk This work is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our Policy Document available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this work please visit the publisher’s website. Where available access to the published online version may require a subscription. Author(s): Gibson, Alex M. Title: An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? Publication year: 2012 Book title: Enclosing the Neolithic : Recent studies in Britain and Ireland. Report No: BAR International Series 2440. Publisher: Archaeopress. Link to publisher’s site: http://www.archaeopress.com/archaeopressshop/public/defaultAll.asp?QuickSear ch=2440 Citation: Gibson, A. (2012). An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? In: Gibson, A. (ed.). Enclosing the Neolithic: Recent studies in Britain and Europe. Oxford: Archaeopress. BAR International Series 2440, pp. 1-20. Copyright statement: © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2012. An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? Alex Gibson Abstract This paper summarises 80 years of ‘henge’ studies. It considers the range of monuments originally considered henges and how more diverse sites became added to the original list. It examines the diversity of monuments considered to be henges, their origins, their associated monument types and their dates. Since the introduction of the term, archaeologists have often been uncomfortable with it. -
Army Basing Salisbury Plan Planning Applications New SFA Exhibition Banners
Army Basing - Salisbury Plain Planning Applications 1 Introduction Government announcements The Army Basing Plan announced on 5th March 2013 confirmed Salisbury Plain as a major focus of the Reaction Force element of Army 2020. For further details on the wider programme visit: www.gov.uk/government/consultations/salisbury-plain- training-area-master-plan-army-basing-programme. The Government has committed up to £800 million to be invested in the Salisbury Plain area. The planned changes In total there will be approximately 7,700 people moving to the Salisbury Plain area comprising 4,300 additional service personnel plus their families. To provide the necessary infrastructure the key elements of the Masterplan for the Army Basing Programme are: • Extensive new construction and refurbishment of existing buildings within the existing base perimeter for: • Single living accommodation (SLA), with dining, catering, recreational and welfare facilities; and • Technical accommodation, including workshops, garages, armouries, stores and offices. • Outside the existing base perimeter there will be changes to the training area; and • 1,017 new houses for Service Family Accommodation (SFA); 444 in Larkhill; 246 in Ludgershall; 227 in Bulford; and 100 purchased in Tidworth. The Salisbury Plain Masterplan In 2014 a Salisbury Plain Masterplan was prepared to illustrate the necessary changes to existing infrastructure to serve the needs of this larger community of Army personnel and service families. The Masterplan, together with the supporting Environmental Report, sets the planning framework for the development of each site identified. Planning applications Over the past few months, proposals for a number of sites identified in the Masterplan - Bulford, Ludgershall and Larkhill - have been developed. -
Concrete Prehistories: the Making of Megalithic Modernism 1901-1939
Concrete Prehistories: The Making of Megalithic Modernism Abstract After water, concrete is the most consumed substance on earth. Every year enough cement is produced to manufacture around six billion cubic metres of concrete1. This paper investigates how concrete has been built into the construction of modern prehistories. We present an archaeology of concrete in the prehistoric landscapes of Stonehenge and Avebury, where concrete is a major component of megalithic sites restored between 1901 and 1964. We explore how concreting changed between 1901 and the Second World War, and the implications of this for constructions of prehistory. We discuss the role of concrete in debates surrounding restoration, analyze the semiotics of concrete equivalents for the megaliths, and investigate the significance of concreting to interpretations of prehistoric building. A technology that mixes ancient and modern, concrete helped build the modern archaeological imagination. Concrete is the substance of the modern –”Talking about concrete means talking about modernity” (Forty 2012:14). It is the material most closely associated with the origins and development of modern architecture, but in the modern era, concrete has also been widely deployed in the preservation and display of heritage. In fact its ubiquity means that concrete can justifiably claim to be the single most dominant substance of heritage conservation practice between 1900 and 1945. This paper investigates how concrete has been built into the construction of modern pasts, and in particular, modern prehistories. As the pre-eminent marker of modernity, concrete was used to separate ancient from modern, but efforts to preserve and display prehistoric megaliths saw concrete and megaliths become entangled. -
Cuisine and Consumption at the Late Neolithic Site of Durrington Walls
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery Feeding Stonehenge: cuisine and consumption at the Late Neolithic site of Durrington Walls Oliver E. Craiga, Lisa-Marie Shillitoa,b, Umberto Albarellac, Sarah Viner-Danielsc, Ben Chanc,d, Ros Cleale, Robert Ixerf, Mandy Jayg, Pete Marshallh., Ellen Simmonsc, Elizabeth Wrightc and Mike Parker Pearsonf aBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. b School of History, Classics and Archaeology, University of Edinburgh, UK cDepartment of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, UK d Laboratory for Artefact Studies, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, The Netherlands e Alexander Keiller Museum, Avebury, Wiltshire, UK f Institute of Archaeology, University College London, London, UK g Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of Human Evolution, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany h English Heritage, 1 Waterhouse Square, 138-142 Holborn, London, UK Introduction Henges are distinctive monuments of the Late Neolithic in Britain, defined as ditched enclosures in which a bank is constructed outside the ditch. The largest is Durrington Walls (Fig 1), a 17ha monument near Stonehenge. Excavations at Durringon Walls from 1966 to 1968 revealed the remains of two timber circles, the Northern and Southern Circles, within the henge enclosure (Wainwright and Longworth, 1971). More recent excavations (2004-2007) have identified a settlement that pre-dates the henge by a few decades and is concurrent with the main construction phase of Stonehenge (Parker Pearson et al., 2007, Parker Pearson, 2007, Thomas, 2007). Middens and pits, with substantial quantities of animal bones, broken Grooved Ware ceramics and other food-related debris, accumulated quickly since the settlement has an estimated start of 2535-2475 cal BC (95% probability) and a use of 0-55 years (95% probability). -
Salisbury Plain 0 0
400000 402500 405000 407500 410000 412500 415000 Wilsford URCHFONT Charlton St Peter Rushall Eastcott Easterton 0 0 SALISBURY PLAIN 0 0 0 UPAVON 0 5 5 5 5 1 1 WILTSHIRE Ridgeway Corridor MARKET Map 4 LAVINGTON R Resulting Access Network iv e r A v Training Area Extent o n WEST C Impact Area e LAVINGTON n East t r a Casterley Chisenbury Danger Areas l 0 0 0 R Information 0 5 5 a 2 2 5 R n Point 5 Larkhill Perimeter Route 1 o g 1 u e (minimum Bridleway status) t e IMPACT R AREA Flag Free 2 o 9 a d Larkhill Perimeter Route (Byway) Compton Subject to Flag Littlecott Proposed Great Stones Way Proposed Re-Routing of Trans-Wilts Bridleway ENFORD Byway ! ! Restricted Byway Bridleway Footpath 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 1 1 Rights of Way supplied by Wiltshire Council A This map is for information purposes only. 3 The document should not be regarded as a copy of the 6 Fittleton 0 definitive map and must not be used as a true legal record. For further information regarding definitive rights of way please contact Wiltshire County Council. NETHERAVON Scale 1:50,000 The scale ratio stated is accurate when reproduced A at A3 size by Geospatial Services South. Any other 3 TILSHEAD DANGER AREA 4 reproduction by conventional or electronic means, 5 e.g. printing from a PDF, may alter the scale of the DANGER AREA Westdown map. Please check the dimensions of the grid to Camp confirm any change in scale before taking measurements. -
Newton Tony CE VC Primary School
Newton Tony CE VC Primary School Admissions Arrangements 2018-2019 Policy agreed November 2017 Policy review September 2018 This policy applies solely to applications for places at Voluntary Controlled (VC) and Community (C) Primary, Infant and Junior Schools. Foundation (F), Voluntary Aided schools (VA) and Academies (A) are their own admissions authorities and the governing bodies are responsible for determining their own procedures and policies. Determined arrangements for the co-ordination of primary admissions are drafted with the determined co-ordinated admissions scheme 2018/19. The application round for entry into Reception 2018 and Junior Year 3 entry opens on 1 September 2017. The deadline date for applications to be received is midnight on 15 January 2018. The home address given for the child must be the address where the child is resident as of the deadline date. Designated Area A designated area is a discrete geographical zone served by a school. The address that determines a child’s designated area is the place where s/he is ordinarily resident with his/her parent(s) or legal guardian(s) for the majority of the school week. Most schools have a discrete designated area but some addresses fall within areas shared by two or more schools. Children living outside the county boundary are treated as if the children live within Wiltshire but outside the designated area for the school(s) in question. For admission criterion purposes, the address used for Bargees, will be the sorting office or main post office address, closest to the place of mooring as of the deadline date. -
Table 1 - Original Proposals for Changes to Contracted Bus Services to Achieve Savings*
Table 1 - Original proposals for changes to contracted bus services to achieve savings* Service Route Original proposal Reason for proposal Reduction in Saturday service to 2 hourly (operationally linked to X2 20 Marlborough - Bedwyn - Hungerford 2-hourly service sufficient to meet demand proposal as uses the same vehicle) Withdrawal of Saturday "shoppers" bus service from Marlborough to Non-essential service - most users have alternative buses to other large X2 Marlborough - Froxfield - Hungerford - Newbury Newbury (operationally linked to service 20 proposal as uses the same towns. vehicle) Non-essential service - most users have alternative buses to other large X76 Marlborough - Calne - Bromham - Bath Withdrawal of daily "shoppers" bus service from Marlboro' to Bath towns. 30 Malmesbury Town Service Reduction in frequency of local town service around Malmesbury to hourly Hourly service still available 33 / X33 Chippenham & Calne to Devizes Reduce service after 4pm on weekdays to hourly Hourly service still available Warminster local services (including to Sutton 50,54,57 Withdraw Warminster local services on Saturday afternoons after 2pm. Low usage at these times Veney and the Deverills Withdrawal of Wednesday "shoppers" bus service from Chapmanslade to 51 Frome - Chapmanslade - Warminster Very low usage (almost nil) Warminster Cirencester - Ashton Keynes - Cricklade - High cost per passenger, and low use by Wiltshire residents. Other 51A Withdrawal of Sunday service Swindon contributing authorities expected to withdraw financial support -
Army Basing Newsletter – February 2018
Army Basing Newsletter – February 2018 This publication aims to regularly update you on the Army Basing Programme (ABP) announced in 2013 stating some 4,000 additional Service personnel plus their families would relocate to Salisbury Plain by 2020. Wiltshire Council Visit to Perham Down: The MOD Army Basing Team invited Baroness Scott of Bybrook, OBE, Leader of Wiltshire Council, local Wiltshire councillors, the Corporate Director for Growth, Investment and Place (Alistair Cunningham) together with the local Community Engagement Manager (Marc Read) to see recent development at Perham Down on 18 January. In addition, General Wardlaw (Director of Basing and Infrastructure), Mark Duddy (ABP Programme Director) and Allan Thomson (Aspire’s Chief Executive) provided a briefing on the scale and development of the £1billion programme, which is on track to deliver facilities inside and outside ‘the wire’ within the required 2020 timescale. The party also drove through the recently completed Ashdown Housing Estate in Tidworth. Construction Programme: Construction work continues at pace on garrisons (Tidworth, Larkhill, Bulford and Perham Down). As reported previously, many new buildings, extensions and refurbishments are underway or have been completed. Additionally, the school build programme required for the increased military population is well established with St Michael’s Primary School at Larkhill now very prominent on the landscape. Planning permission to extend the Avon Valley College at Durrington was granted, on 11 October 2017. Planning applications for the new school at Ludgershall and extending Wellington Academy were submitted on 1st December 2017 and 8th January 2018 respectively. The tenders for these two schools are due to be returned in mid-April 18, so that all places will be available in August 2019, in good time for the arrival of the Army units arriving in the summer of 2019. -
Needs Analysis for Wiltshire and Swindon
Needs Analysis for Wiltshire and Swindon January 2021 Contents Population profile ..................................................................................................... 4 Deprivation ............................................................................................................. 19 Economy ................................................................................................................. 42 Education, skills and training ................................................................................. 49 Health, wellbeing and disability ........................................................................... 64 Housing ................................................................................................................... 82 Children and young people ................................................................................. 91 Older people ........................................................................................................ 114 Community strength ............................................................................................ 125 Accessibility and isolation ................................................................................... 137 Covid-19 ................................................................................................................ 150 Appendix A – Indicators used in this report ....................................................... 167 2 Needs Analysis for Wiltshire and Swindon 2021 Introduction This report, -
Architectural Report
10 9 5 5 6 1 14 3 15 2 m Figheldean k 4 3 19 1 8 9 29 27 m k 3 30 1 10 4 © Crown copyright and database rights (2015) Ordnance Survey (0100049050) © Crown Copyright and database right (2015) Ordnance Survey (100022467) 32 25 km 2 5 24 LEGEND 12 3 SFA PHASE 4 28 21 9 BUFFERS AT 1KM INTERVALS FROM 25 APPLICATION BOUNDARY 3 MOD CAMP 22 31 16 TRAINING AREA m 1k LAND COVERED BY SALISBURY PLAIN 15 3 2 18 MILITARY LANDS BYELAWS 1981 1 6 8 10 14 14 1 BYELAWED DANGER AREA 29 6 32 13 8 SCHEDULE 3 LET FARMLAND 9 8 PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY: 31 6 3 FOOTPATH 6 29 25 2 BRIDLEWAY 28 Durrington BYWAY Larkhill 21 22 RESTRICTED BYWAY 15 8 7 16 NATIONAL CYCLE ROUTE 7 18 LOCAL CYCLE ROUTES: 18 CYCLE WAY/PATH (SURFACED) 19 20 27 15 17 CYCLE WAY/PATH (UNSURFACED) 10 RECOMMENDED CYCLE ROUTE 16 22 3 (ON ROAD) 2 6 5 LAND IN NATIONAL TRUST OWNERSHIP 1 WITH PUBLIC ACCESS 10 30 Bulford 19 5 30 39 4 10 39 37 12 7 9A 6 12 4 2 10 35 44 29 12 North 29 40 8 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 m 36 Amesbury Scale 1:25,000@A3 12 11 13 1 24 Larkhill Phase 4 19 24 Public Access 19 19 1 Fig No: PH4[LA]04 1 21 13 December 2017 45 2 File reference: A100941 PH4 LA04 Public Access.mxd 18 3A 41 20 3 WYG, Floor 5, Longcross Court, 47 Newport Road, Cardiff, CF24 0AD 15 32 33 Tel: +44 (0)29 2082 9200 Fax: +44 (0)29 2045 5321 Email: [email protected] 3 Figheldean © Crown copyright and database rights (2015) Ordnance Survey (0100049050) © Crown Copyright and database right (2015) Ordnance Survey (100022467) LEGEND 9 SFA PHASE 4 BUFFERS AT 1KM INTERVALS FROM APPLICATION BOUNDARY MOD CAMP 26 PUBLIC -
Durrington Walls
Feeding Stonehenge: cuisine and consumption at the Late Neolithic site of Durrington Walls Oliver E. Craig1, Lisa-Marie Shillito1,2, Umberto Albarella3, Sarah Viner-Daniels3, Ben Chan3,4, Ros CleaP, Robert Ixer6, Mandy Jay7, Pete Marshall8, Ellen Simmons3, Elizabeth Wright3 & Mike Parker Pearson6 The discovery o f Neolithic houses at Durrington Walls that are contemporary with the main construction phase o f Stonehenge raised questions as to their interrelationship. Was Durrington Walls the residence o f the builders o f Stonehenge? Were the activities there more significant than simply domestic subsistence? Using lipid residue analysis, this paper identifies the preferential use of certain pottery types for the preparation o f particular food groups and differential consumption of dairy and meat products between monumental and domestic areas o f the site. Supported by the analysis o f faunal remains, the results suggest seasonal feasting and perhaps organised culinary unification o f a diverse community. Keywords: UK, Stonehenge, Neolithic, feasting, isotopic lipid residue analysis, public and private consumption 1 BioArCh, Department o f Archaeology, University o f York, Heslington, York YO lO 5DD , U K (Email: Oliver. craig@york. ac. uk) 2 School o f History, Classics and Archaeology, Armstrong Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK 2 Department o f Archaeology, University o f Sheffield, Northgate House, West Street, Sheffield S I 4ET, U K 4 Laboratory for Artefact Studies, Faculty o f Archaeology, Leiden