2017 Kintail T Msres
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Bangor University MASTERS BY RESEARCH The innovations of radical Islam Kintail, Tessa Award date: 2017 Awarding institution: Bangor University Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 06. Oct. 2021 Tessa Kintail The innovations of radical Islam Thesis submitted for the degree of MARes School of Philosophy and Religion Bangor University / Prifysgol Bangor September 2017 2 Summary Islam’s leading contemporary teachers have refuted the theological principles of extremist thinking. Radicalisation experiences are increasingly heard and explored. However, a gap in countering Islamic extremism exists, which this study seeks to identify and address. Requiring authority from the texts for their actions, radical ideologues alter classical ideas to contextualise violent interpretations. This is not an organic religious evolution or adaptation of meaning to address cultural crisis, but the selective goal-based reduction and revision of God’s message. This study identifies those changes in meaning, and asks whether these are changes to religious matters, or forms of social innovation unacceptable to Islam. It uses a range of methodologies to triangulate factors of innovation found in academic typologies with an assessment of innovation in changes to key concepts and an analysis of the perspectives of Muslims. An investigation of radicalism includes an attempted chronology, and a distillation of the key concepts that are important to radical and extremist thinking. After an exploration of relevant theories of innovation and of religious innovation, consideration is given to the usage and dimensions of bidah. This produces a working definition by which to assess the acceptability of key concepts. To add to these assessments, a survey of Muslim perspectives shows that respondents whose practice of Islam was more frequent preferred greater literalism, and the majority of those who preferred literalism indicated radical ideologies to be prohibited bidah. Participants’ wide range of views resulted in few significant correlations: this diversity reflects the typology mapping: radical ideologies are considered both as innovations and as not innovative at all. The study also reflected a range of understanding of bidah. In concluding, I offer suggestions for practical application. These include emphasising the Qur’an over ahadith, re-examining Qur’anic abrogations and interpretations, and a potential way to assess new interpretations. Number of words excluding footnotes, bibliography and Declaration: 49,735 3 4 The innovations of radical Islam Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 3 The innovations of radical Islam ......................................................................................................... 5 Figures ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. 6 Notes ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Declaration and Consent ..................................................................................................................... 7 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................11 2 Describing radical Islam ................................................................................................................19 3 The development of radical ideologies ........................................................................................71 4 Types of innovation ....................................................................................................................105 5 Muslim views on religious innovation in Islam ..........................................................................139 6 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................163 7 Appendices .................................................................................................................................175 8 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................219 Figures 2.5 A Mapping of all identified themes ........................................................................................... 50 2.5 B Mapping comparison: fundamentalist and traditional themes ............................................. 51 2.5 C Mapping comparison: Salafism and traditional themes ........................................................ 52 2.5 D Mapping comparison: radical and traditional themes ........................................................... 53 2.5 E Mapping comparison: fundamentalist and radical themes ................................................... 54 2.5 F Mapping comparison: fundamentalist and Muslim Brotherhood themes............................. 57 2.5 G Mapping comparison: radical and Muslim Brotherhood themes .......................................... 58 2.5 H Mapping comparison: radical and Salafism themes .............................................................. 60 2.5 I Mapping comparison: radical and ‘knowledge area’ of all other themes combined ............. 61 2.5 J Mapping progressive innovation ............................................................................................. 62 2.5 K Mapping regressive innovation .............................................................................................. 63 2.5 L Mapping comparison: radical theme and types of innovation ............................................... 64 2.5 M Mapping comparison: fundamentalist theme and types of innovation ............................... 65 2.5 N Mapping comparison: Salafism and Wahhab themes and types of innovation .................... 66 2.5 O Mapping comparison: types of Salafism and types of innovation ......................................... 67 2.5 P Mapping comparison: traditional theme and types of innovation ........................................ 68 3.2 Influences on radicalism – a concept-based analysis ................................................................ 88 4.1 Summary of concepts as bidah or as innovation in religious matters .................................... 138 5.3 Distribution of religiosity scores ............................................................................................. 143 5.5 A Those who practice five times a day: radical ideologies best described as ......................... 153 5.5 B Those who feel a literal reading is preferable: radical ideologies best described as ........... 154 5.7 A Disagreeing that innovation in worship is forbidden: radical ideologies best described as 160 5 Acknowledgements Firstly and always, to my family: I am thankful to have you in my life and for your interest in everything I do. Thank you so much for the discussions, questions, proof- reading and encouragement you have given me throughout this project. Farhaan Wali – sincere thanks for your feedback and your guidance, and for giving me the space to explore my ideas. I am grateful to the three interviewees: thank you for your insights, for sharing your experiences, and for your generosity of spirit. I keep you in my thoughts. I appreciate the input of all of the survey respondents: thank you. Notes Arabic terms are provided to aid definition of the English phrases used to represent them. On the first use of an Arabic word, I have italicised it to show its origin. However, to avoid over-emphasis, this italicisation is discontinued where these terms occur frequently throughout the text or are also commonly used in English; examples include jihad, Qur’an and Shariah. I have retained the spelling of the Arabic used in quotes and excerpts of the texts except where this might create confusion. 6 10 1 Introduction Extremes occur in all religions, political persuasions and lifestyles. One particular range of extremist views is used to justify terrorism against both Muslims and non- Muslims. These views take a radical and selective view of the faith from which they claim legitimacy. Their reductions of the texts admit only a part of God’s revelation. Islamic radicalism is not homogenous, but such groups and ideologies share identifiable characteristics and origins. I want to understand why these views occur, their basis in the texts and traditions