ENTSO-E HVDC Utilisation and Unavailability Statistics 2020 Publication Date: 24 June 2021 System Operations Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ENTSO-E HVDC Utilisation and Unavailability Statistics 2020 Publication Date: 24 June 2021 System Operations Committee ENTSO-E HVDC Utilisation and Unavailability Statistics 2020 Publication Date: 24 June 2021 System Operations Committee European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity ENTSO-E HVDC Utilisation and Unavailability Statistics 2020 Copyright © 2021 ENTSO-E AISBL Report rendered 28 June 2021 European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity Executive Summary The HVDC links are important components for a stable op- The most utilised electricity market connection was the one eration of the Nordic and Baltic power system while sup- between Finland and Sweden (FI–SE3, HVDC links Fenno- porting the commercial power trade in the European energy Skan 1 and 2), with 85 % of the technical capacity being used markets. Furthermore, the HVDC links can provide other for transmission, as shown in Table ES.1. No other market important functions like voltage and emergency power sup- connection reached such a high utilisation percentage, and port to the HVAC grid. Hence, the advantages of keeping only seven of the thirteen market connections showed a util- the HVDC links in operation as much as possible are indis- isation percentage of more than 60 %. However, the utili- putable. The ENTSO-E HVDC Utilisation and Unavailabil- sation percentage of all HVDC links in 2020 was still at its ity Statistics 2020 report aims to provide an overview of the all-time highest value since 2012. The market connections Nordic and Baltic HVDC links as well as a detailed view of with most unavailability were the ones between Denmark each individual link. The executive summary concludes the and Netherlands (DK1–NL, HVDC link COBRAcable) and most important parts of the report into one chapter. Denmark and Germany (DK2–DE, HVDC link Kontek), with 29 % and 30 % of the total capacity being unavailable due to Overview outages and limitations, respectively. In 2020, 58.8 TWh of electric energy was transmitted through Table ES.1: Annual utilisation rate of HVDC links per bidding zone. the Nordic and Baltic HVDC links, which is approximately 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 DK1–DK2 45% 54% 58% 70% 78% 64% 63% 58% 71% 62 % of the total technical capacity (Emax) and correlates well 80% 51% with the percentage utilisation from previous years. Never- DK1–NL DK2–DE 70% 70% 73% 75% 67% 66% 53% 69% 47% theless, the transmitted energy and unavailable technical ca- FI–EE 59% 55% 41% 57% 42% 29% 37% 47% 75% pacity is showing a slight increasing trend after a significant FI–SE3 54% 53% 76% 76% 78% 70% 72% 81% 85% drop in 2012 and 2013, as seen in Figure ES.1. LT–PL 34% 47% 54% 61% 58% % Tecnhical capacity not used NO2–DK1 68% 61% 55% 54% 61% 54% 53% 46% 62% Annual utilisation of all HVDC links % Transmission NO2–NL 89% 72% 90% 94% 72% 83% 68% 61% 77% % Unavailable technical capacity 69 TWh 69 TWh 75 TWh 80 TWh 89 TWh 89 TWh 89 TWh 90 TWh 95 TWh RU–FI 34% 36% 25% 29% 46% 50% 67% 61% 23% 100% ) Eₘₐₓ ₓ SE3–DK1 56% 40% 49% 49% 59% 52% 53% 50% 57% ₐ ₘ 24% E ( 31% SE4–DE 60% 32% 47% 31% 43% 46% 33% 36% 55% 33% 37% 35% 35% 35% 33% y 80% 40% t i c SE4–LT 44% 51% 50% 63% 76% a p a c SE4–PL 52% 34% 61% 67% 56% 62% 66% 62% 72% l 60% a c i n Grand Total 57% 50% 56% 58% 57% 56% 57% 58% 62% h 62% c e 58% t 40% 57% 57% l 50% 56% 58% 57% 56% a t o t f The most significant unavailabilities in 2020 occurred for o 20% % Baltic Cable, COBRAcable, Kontek, Konti-Skan 2, NorNed 14% 0% 10% 10% 7% 7% 8% 9% 10% 11% and Skagerrak 1–4. Baltic Cable had 1 more severe distur- 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 bance outage, which was caused by a fault on the DC sub- Figure ES.1: The annual utilisation of all HVDC links since 2012. marine cable, probably cut by an anchor of a boat, and lasted Technical capacity not used is the amount of energy that has nei- 29 days. The limitations on Baltic Cable were mainly due ther been transmitted nor been unavailable due to limitations or to maintenance in the AC grid. COBRAcable’s unavailabil- outages. ity was mainly due to a disturbance outage caused by a sub- The total number of disturbance outages registered was 51, marine cable fault in September and lasted until 8 January preventing 4.1 TWh of potential energy transmission, or 2021. Kontek had a fault on the land cable on the German 4.3 % of the total technical capacity (Emax). Maintenance out- side, which resulted in 94 days of further unplanned main- ages amounted to 4.8 TWh, or 5.0 % of the total technical ca- tenance shortly after the 18 day long annual maintenance in pacity (Emax), and limitations reduced the transmission ca- September. Konti-Skan 2 (and 1) limitations where mainly pacity by 4.0 TWh (4.2 % of the total technical HVDC trans- due to maintenances on the AC-grid on both the Danish and mission capacity). The amount of unavailable technical ca- Swedish side. The disturbance outage on Konti-Skan 2 was pacity compared to the total technical capacity (Emax) has due to a fault in the smoothing reactor. increased by approximately 1 % per year since 2015 and was NorNed’s planned maintenance outages and limitations in 2020 at its highest point since 2012, as can be seen from were due to AC filters problems in Holland. The limitations Figure ES.1. The increasing trend is visible in all unavailabil- were also due to the AC filters. Both Skagerrak 1 and 2 had a ity categories except other outages. The unavailable techni- long disturbance outage caused by a cable fault due to (dif- cal capacity includes disturbance outages, limitations, un- ferent) ships. Skagerrak 4 had an additional planned mainte- planned and planned maintenance outages and other out- nance outage from May to July to cut cable samples for tests ages. ENTSO-E HVDC Utilisation and Unavailability Statistics 2020 | i European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity and investigations. Skagerrak 1, 2, 3 and 4 have been limited mission as in 2012 when approximately 59 % of the technical due to “careful operation” since the Skagerrak 4 cable faults capacity (Emax) was utilised. The remarkable increase also in December 2019. In 2020, the north direction (DK1→NO2) applies to EstLink 2, where 85 % of the technical capacity was prioritised until March, after which the south direction (Emax) was utilised as transmission. EstLink 2’s utilisation (NO2→DK1) was prioritised. The effect of these incidents can was the second highest of all HVDC links in this report in be seen in Figure ES.2. 2020, while at the same time reaching its all-time high value Unavailability percentage for each HVDC link in 2020 since its commissioning in 2014. The technical capacity not used was 40 % of the technical capacity (Emax) for EstLink 1 Baltic Cable 18.7% and 12 % for EstLink 2. COBRAcable 29.3% 3.0% EstLink 1 Unavailable technical capacity (EU) due to outages and limi- EstLink 2 2.5% tations reached approximately 3 % for both EstLink 1 and 2. Fenno-Skan 1 1.6% Fenno-Skan 2 0.5% Also, approximately 3 % of all operating hours were affected Kontek 30.0% by outages or limitations for both EstLink 1 and EstLink 2, Konti-Skan 1 14.0% which means that nearly all of the outages and limitations Konti-Skan 2 19.2% reduced the transmission capacity by 100 % when they oc- LitPol Link 8.6% curred. NordBalt 5.5% NorNed 16.9% Fenno-Skan 1 and 2 Skagerrak 1 33.9% Skagerrak 2 44.2% The use of Fenno-Skan 1 continued to be very high in 2020, Skagerrak 3 17.1% with 97 % of the technical capacity (Emax) being utilised Skagerrak 4 17.3% for transmission. On the other hand, the utilisation rate of Storebaelt 0.3% Fenno-Skan 2 was 78 % of the maximum technical capacity SwePol 12.8% Vyborg Link 11.5% (Emax) leaving approximately 21 % of the technical capacity Grand Total 13.5% unused (ETCNU). The technical capacity not usedTCNU (E ) of 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Fenno-Skan 2 increased slightly (by 1 percentage point) com- pared to 2019 (20 %), but was still only approximately half of % of total technical capacity (Eₘₐₓ) the respective values in 2017 (40 %) and 2018 (39 %). Fenno- Figure ES.2: Percentage of unavailable technical capacity due to limitations, disturbance outages, unplanned and planned mainte- Skan 1 was the most utilised HVDC link in 2020 in this report, nance and other outages for each link in 2020. and Fenno-Skan 2 was the third most utilised HVDC link. Almost all of the transmitted energy of Fenno-Skan 1 and Individual HVDC links 2 was transmitted from Sweden to Finland (SE3→FI) via Fenno-Skan 1 and 2. Both links had 4 planned maintenance Baltic Cable outages each, and Fenno-Skan 1 had 3 minor disturbance Baltic Cable had in 2020 its highest utilisation percentage of outages. The average number of outages since 2017 is lower 55 % of the maximum technical capacity (Emax) since 2013. than the corresponding value for 2012–2016. Totally, below However, a fifth of the maximum technical capacity was un- 1 % of the maximum technical capacity was unavailable (EU) available. The unavailability was mainly due to one distur- due to outages and limitations in 2020.
Recommended publications
  • For Hydropower
    REVIEW GRID EXTENSION Swapping wind power for hydropower Two cable routes between Norway calm, power can run into the opposite direction. Everybody is intended to benefit from the and Germany are expected to arrangements. The project partners involved believe enhance the two countries’ security that the renewable energy sources in the two countries complement each other perfectly. Electricity of supply. The NorGer and Nord.Link demand in Norway is met by using huge storage reservoirs that fill up with water from melting snow projects are awaiting their approval. starting in May and reach their highest level in autumn. During winter, when precipitation is again lthough the issue is already well known, it is mostly snow, the water is used up due to high power now becoming politically charged because of consumption. Wind power from Germany is especial­ Athe German government’s decision to press ly produced between October and March and thus on towards the “Energiewende” – the exclusive reli­ could ensure that water reservoirs in Norway are not ance on renewable energy. Phasing out nuclear ener­ emptied too fast, while the well filled reservoirs in Wind power from Germany gy and moving the energy industry towards renew­ summer compensate for weak wind months. is set to be coupled to water able sources will only be possible if new storage sys­ storage reservoirs in Norway. tems are being developed and used. One possibility One idea, two models Photo: Statnett SF would be using hydro reservoirs. As capacities of this kind are fairly restricted in Germany, some are think­ However, there are two different business models be­ ing of looking for opportunities farther north: Norway hind this basic idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Swepol Link Sets New Environmental Standard for HVDC Transmission
    00 ABB Review 4/2001 SwePol Link sets new environmental standard for HVDC transmission Leif Söderberg, Bernt Abrahamsson Six cable links – all of them HVDC (high-voltage direct current) – are currently in service between the power grids of continental Europe and the Nordic region, with another five planned. The latest to be brought on line is the SwePol Link, which connects the electricity networks of Poland and Sweden. It is unique in that, unlike previous installations that depend on electrode stations to transmit the return current under ground or under water, it uses 20-kV XLPE cable to carry this current. The high-voltage HVDC submarine cable used for the SwePol Link is designed for 600 MW at 450 kV. he reason for all these links is the technically feasible to reverse the entire onds to prevent grid failure if the voltage T vital need to secure power system 600 MW power throughput of the in southern Sweden drops below 380 kV. reliability in each of the participating SwePol Link in just 1.3 seconds, although With all previous links of this kind, countries. They make it easier to this is not a feature that will be used in electrode stations off the coast transmit optimize power generation in an area in practice. Nevertheless, a typical emer- the return current under the sea, and this which different countries use different gency power measure could call for a has worked perfectly well (Table 1). The means of power generation and have ∆P ramp-up of 300 MW within a few sec- first such cable link was laid in 1954 different power demand profiles over a 24-hour period.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities and Challenges for Secure Energy Networks Connected with New Technologies
    The OSCE Secretariat bears no responsibility for the content of this document EEF.NGO/9/19 and circulates it without altering its content. The distribution by OSCE 30 May 2019 Conference Services of this document is without prejudice to OSCE decisions, as set out in documents agreed by OSCE participating States. ENGLISH only Opportunities and challenges for secure energy networks connected with new technologies 27th OSCE Economic and EnvironmentalForum Rimvydas Stilinis, Director for Infrastructure 2nd Preparatory Meeting EPSO-G (Group of TSOs in Lithuania) Bratislava 27-28 May, 2019 How do we understand ‚energysecurity‘? RELIABILITY REASONABLE ACCESSIBILITY ENERGY SECURITY PRICES 1 Where does Lithuania stands now? Since 2012, Lithuanian energy security has remarkablyimproved. Nevertheless, key challenges remain: Strong dependence on electricityimport Dependence and integration intoRussian controlled IPS/UPS electricity system Declining trend of RESdevelopments Progress achieved Until 2025 NORDBALT 700 MW Lithuanian diversification and integration into European/World energy markets LNG TERMINAL Until 2025 Until 2025 LitPol Link 500 MW 2 Challenge No. 1 – Synchronizationwith Continental Europe • The Baltic States – the only ones in the EU with their electricity systems in the Soviet system ŠiNaourrtơhs IPS/UPS Did žio sio s BREL žiedacircles • No dependency of the energy system on BGrrietaant iBjoristain third countries will remain AIrierliajonsd MoscowMaskva • Increasing the effectiveness ofthe market • The most reliable measure to protect
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Stories: Contributions to the History of Electricity in Sweden
    Electric Stories Contributions to the history of electricity in Sweden Collected papers by Mats Bladh Published by Linköping University Electronic Press, 2011 ISBN: 978‐91‐7393‐078‐9 URL: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva‐70080 Cover Photo: Aatu Liimatta © The Author Content About Collected Papers ............................................................................................. 5 About the author ....................................................................................................... 6 “Momentum” In the Swedish Electricity Industry ..................................................... 7 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Four beginnings .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Utilities ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Industrial firms ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 Power companies ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Network Development Plan 2016 – 2025
    NOVEMBER 2015 NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2016 – 2025 A Ten-Year Plan for the Swedish National Grid. SVENSKA KRAFTNÄT Our society is dependent on electricity. Svenska kraftnät is responsible for ensuring that Sweden has a safe, environmentally sound and cost-effective transmission system for electricity – today and in the future. We achieve this in the short term by monitoring the electrical system around the clock, and in the long term by building new power lines to meet tomorrow’s electricity needs. Cover photo Tomas Ärlemo Org. Nr 202100-4284 SVENSKA KRAFTNÄT Box 1200 172 24 Sundbyberg Sweden Sturegatan 1 Tel +46 10-475 80 00 Fax +46 10-475 89 50 www.svk.se/en PREFACE The board of Svenska kraftnät decided in April 2013 on a long-term plan document for the development of the Swedish National Grid. Long-term plan 2025 described the challenges for Svenska kraftnät in the 10 to 15 years term. The purpose was, among other things, to increase the transparency of Svenska kraftnät’s planning and to provide an opportunity for the various stakeholders in the electricity market to influence it. Until then, the national network planning mainly consisted of the three-year investment and financing plans that Svenska kraftnät annually provide to the Government. These plans are, however, primarily a description of how investments already decided are expected to turn out over the next three financial years. They do not give an account of the Administration’s long-term priorities and the grounds for them. A certain network planning is conducted also at Nordic level in order to identify grid reinforcements with specific benefit for the whole of the Nordic electricity market.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands
    20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands VDE-Bezirksverein Kassel e.V., Universität Kassel am 21.01.2016 Walter Schossig, Gotha VDE Ausschuss Geschichte der Elektrotechnik [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de Tel: 03621/701016 Folie 1 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands Chronologie Entstehung von Verbundnetzen Trennung des Deutschen Verbundnetzes Entwicklung in Ost- und Westeuropa Innerdeutscher Stromexport Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands Erweiterung des Europäischen Verbundnetzes Ein Auszug der Vortragsfolien. Bei Interesse an Quellenangaben oder weiteren Informationen: [email protected] bzw. www.walter-schossig.de/Literatur [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de Tel: 03621/701016 Folie 2 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands Beginn der Stromversorgung 1866-1878 Technisch wirtschaftliche Versuche 1878-1884 Einzelanlagen 1884-1890 Blockanlagen 1890-1900 Ortszentralen 1900-1913 Überlandzentralen 1913-1915 Anfänge der Verbundwirtschaft [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de Tel: 03621/701016 Folie 3 20 Jahre Elektrische Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands < Einzelanlagen 1878-1884 > 1878 St.George Lane Fox (GB) u. Thomas Alva Edison (US) entwickeln erste Pläne zur kollektiven Verteilung des Stromes in ganze Stadtteile, die im Jahre 1881 in Godalming (GB) und ein Jahr später in New York (US) ihre erste Anwendung finden [email protected] www.walter-schossig.de
    [Show full text]
  • Nordic HVDC Interconnectors' Statistics 2013
    European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity NORDIC HVDC UTILIZATION AND UNAVAILABILITY STATISTICS 2013 03.11.2014 REGIONAL GROUP NORDIC ENTSO-E AISBL • Avenue Cortenbergh 100 • 1000 Brussels • Belgium • Tel +32 2 741 09 50 • [email protected] • www.entsoe.eu European Network of Nordic HVDC Utilization and Unavailability Statistics 2013 Transmission System Operators for Electricity 1 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 3 2 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .................................................................... 4 3 SCOPE ............................................................................................................. 5 4 METHODS, DEFINITIONS AND CALCULATIONS ...................................................... 6 5 TECHNICAL DETAILS OF THE HVDC LINKS ........................................................ 10 6 PRESENTATION OF THE RESULTS FOR 2013 ..................................................... 11 6.1 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 12 6.2 SEPARATE PRESENTATIONS OF ALL LINKS ................................................................................ 14 6.2.1 BALTIC CABLE HVDC LINK ..................................................................................................... 15 6.2.2 ESTLINK 1 HVDC LINK ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012
    Annual Report 2012 Aastaaruanne 2012 Kaane kujundus alles tuleb Creating New Energy! We will release the Group’s consolidated interim reports for the financial year 2013 as follows: Corporate • 1st quarter – 30 April 2013 Social Responsibility 2012 • 2nd quarter – 31 July 2013 • 3rd quarter – 31 October 2013 The audited results for the financial year 2013 will be released on 28 February 2014 Click here to read the Corporate Social Responsibility Report www.energia.ee/en/investor Contents Address by the Chairman of the Management Board 5 In Brief 7 Strategy 11 Business Environment 15 Financial Results 22 Environment 45 Corporate Governance 49 Consolidated Financial Statements 71 Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated Income Statement 71 23 Trade and Other Payables 131 24 Deferred Income 131 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 72 25 Provisions 132 26 Revenue 134 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 73 27 Other Operating Income 134 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 74 28 Raw Materials and Consumables Used 135 29 Payroll Expenses 135 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 75 30 Other Operating Expenses 136 31 Net Financial Income (-expense) 136 Notes to the Consolidated Financial statements 76 32 Corporate Income Tax 136 1 General Information 76 33 Cash Generated From Operations 137 2 Summary of Principal Accounting and Reporting Policies 76 34 Off-balance Sheet Assets, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments 137 3 Financial risk management 97 35 Assets and Liabilites of Disposal Group Classified as Held
    [Show full text]
  • Tennet Integrated Annual Report 2019
    TenneT Holding B.V. Integrated Annual Report 2019 Key figures 2019 Safe workplace Diverse workforce Safety (TRIR) Gender ratio 4.8 23% 77% Satisfied capital providers* Environmental impact ROIC % Greened of our carbon footprint 5.1 27.4% Grid availability Safeguard capital structure* Grid availability FFO/Net debt 99.9998% 14.8% Future proof grid* Our workforce Annual Investments (EUR million) Number of employees (internal and external) 3,064 4,913 Engaged stakeholders Healthy financial operations* Reputation survey EBIT (EUR million) fairly strong to very strong 768 * Based on underlying figures Table of contents Integrated 2019 at a glance 2 Annual Letter from the Board 4 Report 2019 * About TenneT 6 Profile 6 Our strategy and value creation 9 Materiality analysis 14 * Our performance in 2019 16 Deliver a high security of supply 16 Ensure critical infrastructure for society 23 Create a sustainable workplace 30 Contents Create value to transition to a low carbon economy 36 Secure a solid financial performance and investor rating 44 Solve societal challenges with stakeholders and through partnerships 50 Statements of the Executive Board 57 Our Executive Board 58 Supervisory Board Report 60 Supervisory Board Report 60 Remuneration policy 66 Board remuneration 68 Our Supervisory Board 72 * Governance and risk management 74 Corporate governance 74 Risk management and internal control 76 Risk management and internal control framework 79 Compliance and integrity 80 Risk appetite 82 Key risks 83 Financial statements 87 Consolidated financial statements 88 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 95 Company financial statements 147 Notes to the company financial statements 149 Other information 152 Profit appropriation 152 Independent auditor’s report 153 Assurance report of the independent auditor 160 About this report 163 Reconciliation of non-IFRS financial measures 168 SWOT Analysis 169 Key figures: five-year summary 170 Glossary 171 * These sections reflect the director’s report as mentioned by Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
    [Show full text]
  • System Plan 2018 – Electricity and Gas in Denmark 2 System Plan 2018
    SYSTEM PLAN 2018 – ELECTRICITY AND GAS IN DENMARK 2 SYSTEM PLAN 2018 CONTENTS 1. A holistic approach to electricity and gas planning ......................................3 1.1 Energinet’s objectives and the political framework .............................................. 3 1.2 New organisation ............................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Analysis and planning .................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Research and development .......................................................................................... 8 1.5 Environmental reporting ..............................................................................................10 1.6 Energy efficiency ............................................................................................................11 2. Electricity .........................................................................................................16 2.1 Security of electricity supply ......................................................................................17 2.2 Resources to safeguard balance and technical quality ......................................22 2.3 Cooperation with other countries ..............................................................................24 2.4 Cooperation with other grid operators ....................................................................29 2.5 Planning for conversion and expansion of electrical installations
    [Show full text]
  • EWEA Offshore Report 2009
    Oceans of Opportunity Harnessing Europe’s largest domestic energy resource A report by the European Wind Energy Association Oceans of opportunity Europe’s offshore wind potential is enormous and able to power Europe seven times over. Huge developer interest Over 100 GW of offshore wind projects are already in various stages of planning. If realised, these projects would produce 10% of the EU’s electricity whilst avoiding 200 million tonnes of CO2 emissions each year. Repeating the onshore success EWEA has a target of 40 GW of offshore wind in the EU by 2020, implying an average annual market growth of 28% over the coming 12 years. The EU market for onshore wind grew by an average 32% per year in the 12-year period from 1992-2004 – what the wind energy industry Oceans of Opportunity has achieved on land can be repeated at sea. Building the offshore grid EWEA’s proposed offshore grid builds on the 11 offshore grids currently operating and 21 offshore grids currently being considered by the grid operators in the Baltic and North Seas to give Europe a truly pan-European electricity super highway. Realising the potential Strong political support and action from Europe’s policy-makers will allow a new, multi-billion euro industry to be built. EWEA Results that speak for themselves This new industry will deliver thousands of green collar jobs and a new About EWEA renewable energy economy and establish Europe as world leader in EWEA is the voice of the wind industry, actively promoting the utilisation of offshore wind power technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements for Interconnection of HVDC Links with DC-DC Converters
    Requirements for interconnection of HVDC links with DC-DC converters Daniel Gomez A., Juan Paez, Marc Cheah-Mane, Jose Maneiro, Piotr Dworakowski, Oriol Gomis-Bellmunt, Florent Morel To cite this version: Daniel Gomez A., Juan Paez, Marc Cheah-Mane, Jose Maneiro, Piotr Dworakowski, et al.. Re- quirements for interconnection of HVDC links with DC-DC converters. IECON 2019 - 45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Oct 2019, Lisbon, Portugal. pp.4854-4860, 10.1109/IECON.2019.8927640. hal-02432353 HAL Id: hal-02432353 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02432353 Submitted on 8 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Requirements for interconnection of HVDC links with DC-DC converters Daniel Gómez A. Juan D. Páez Marc Cheah-Mane Jose Maneiro SuperGrid Institute SuperGrid Institute CITCEA-UPC SuperGrid Institute Villeurbanne, France Villeurbanne, France Barcelona, Spain Villeurbanne, France https://orcid.org/0000-0002- https://orcid.org/0000-0002- https://orcid.org/0000-0002- https://orcid.org/0000-0002- 5647-0488 8712-3630 0942-661X 5717-6176 Piotr Dworakowski Oriol Gomis-Bellmunt Florent Morel SuperGrid Institute CITCEA-UPC SuperGrid Institute Villeurbanne, France Barcelona, Spain Villeurbanne, France https://orcid.org/0000-0002- https://orcid.org/0000-0002- https://orcid.org/0000-0003- 6893-0103 9507-8278 3098-7806 Abstract— The number of high voltage direct current (HVDC) links continue to increase over the years, most of them, for offshore applications or bulk power transmission over long distances.
    [Show full text]