DOCSLIB.ORG

BMJ Open Is Committed to Open Peer Review. As Part of This Commitment We Make the Peer Review History of Every Article We Publish Publicly Available

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BMJ Open Is Committed to Open Peer Review. As Part of This Commitment We Make the Peer Review History of Every Article We Publish Publicly Available BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019312 on 27 March 2018. Downloaded from BMJ Open is committed to open peer review. As part of this commitment we make the peer review history of every article we publish publicly available. When an article is published we post the peer reviewers’ comments and the authors’ responses online. We also post the versions of the paper that were used during peer review. These are the versions that the peer review comments apply to. The versions of the paper that follow are the versions that were submitted during the peer review process. They are not the versions of record or the final published versions. They should not be cited or distributed as the published version of this manuscript. BMJ Open is an open access journal and the full, final, typeset and author-corrected version of record of the manuscript is available on our site with no access controls, subscription charges or pay-per-view fees (http://bmjopen.bmj.com). If you have any questions on BMJ Open’s open peer review process please email [email protected] http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ on September 26, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. BMJ Open BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019312 on 27 March 2018. Downloaded from Inter-agency collaboration models for people with mental health problems in contact with the police: a systematic scoping review ForJournal: peerBMJ Open review only Manuscript ID bmjopen-2017-019312 Article Type: Research Date Submitted by the Author: 24-Aug-2017 Complete List of Authors: Parker, Adwoa; University of York, York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences Scantlebury, Arabella; University of York, Centre for Reviews & Dissemination Booth, Alison; York University, CRD Macbryde, Jillian; University of York, York Management School Scott, William; North Yorkshire Police Wright, Kath; University of York, Centre for Reviews & Dissemination McDaid, Catriona; University of York, York Trials Unit <b>Primary Subject Mental health Heading</b>: Health services research, Legal and forensic medicine, Mental health, Public http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ Secondary Subject Heading: health police, MENTAL HEALTH, systematic scoping review, inter-agency Keywords: collaboration on September 26, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml Page 1 of 75 BMJ Open BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019312 on 27 March 2018. Downloaded from 1 2 3 4 5 INTER-AGENCY COLLABORATION MODELS FOR PEOPLE WITH MENTAL 6 7 HEALTH PROBLEMS IN CONTACT WITH THE POLICE: A SYSTEMATIC 8 9 SCOPING REVIEW 10 11 12 1* 1 1 2 3 13 Adwoa Parker , Arabella Scantlebury , Alison Booth , Jillian Catherine MacBryde , William J Scott , 14 4 1 Kath Wright , Catriona McDaid 15 16 For peer review only 17 18 AUTHOR AFFILIATIONS 19 1 20 York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom, 21 22 2The York Management School, University of York, YO10 5DD 23 24 3North Yorkshire Police, Newby Wiske Hall, Northallerton, North Yorkshire, DL7 9HA 25 26 27 4Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, YO10 5DD 28 29 30 31 CORRESPONDING AUTHOR 32 *Adwoa Parker, Email: [email protected] http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 33 34 35 36 37 38 WORD COUNT: 3794 39 40 on September 26, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. 41 42 43 Key Words: Police, mental health, systematic scoping review, inter-agency-collaboration 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Interagency scoping review manuscript v6 24/08/2017 Page 1 of 30 59 60 For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml BMJ Open Page 2 of 75 BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019312 on 27 March 2018. Downloaded from 1 2 3 ABSTRACT 4 5 6 Objective: To identify existing evidence on inter-agency collaboration between law enforcement, 7 emergency services, statutory services and third sector agencies regarding people with mental health 8 9 problems. 10 11 Design: Systematic scoping review. 12 13 Data sources and eligibility: ASSIA, CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library databases, Criminal Justice 14 15 Abstracts, ERIC, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PROSPERO and Social Care Online and Social Sciences 16 Citation Index, wereFor searched peer up to 2017, reviewas were grey literature only and hand searches. Eligible articles 17 18 were empirical evaluations or descriptions of models of inter-agency collaboration between the police 19 20 and other agencies. 21 22 Study appraisal and synthesis: Screening and data extraction were undertaken 23 24 independently by two researchers. Arksey’s framework was used to collate and map included studies. 25 26 Results: One hundred and twenty-six studies were included. The majority of articles were of single 27 28 service evaluations (38%) descriptions of models (28%) and mixed methods evaluations of models 29 (18%). The most frequently reported outcomes (52%) were ‘organisational or service level outcomes’ 30 31 (e.g. arrest rates). Most articles (53%) focused on adults with mental health problems, whilst others 32 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 33 focused on adult offenders with mental health problems (17.4%). Fourteen models of inter-agency 34 collaboration were described, each involving between 2-13 agencies. Frequently reported models were 35 36 ‘pre-arrest diversion’ of people with mental health problems (34%), ‘co-response’ involving joint 37 response by police officers paired with mental health professionals (28.6%) and ‘jail diversion’ 38 39 following arrest (23.8%). 40 on September 26, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. 41 We identified 14 different inter-agency collaboration models catering for a range of 42 Conclusions: 43 mental health related interactions. All but one of these models involved the police and mental health 44 45 services or professionals. Several models have sufficient literature to warrant full systematic reviews of 46 their effectiveness, while others need robust evaluation, by RCT where appropriate. Future evaluations 47 48 should focus on health related outcomes and the impact on key stakeholders. 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Interagency scoping review manuscript v6 24/08/2017 Page 2 of 30 59 60 For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml Page 3 of 75 BMJ Open BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019312 on 27 March 2018. Downloaded from 1 2 3 Strengths and limitations of this study 4 5 • This is the first, broad scoping review to map the evidence available for interagency 6 collaboration models between the police and other agencies, for people with apparent mental 7 8 health problems. 9 • We undertook rigorous searches for the available literature, including grey literature, led by an 10 11 information specialist with input from the team, including a police officer. 12 13 • Two reviewers independently undertook study selection and the data extraction and study 14 coding was checked by a second researcher to ensure robustness in these processes. 15 16 • The lack ofFor an assessment peer of study qualityreview and synthesis onlyof the findings means we were unable 17 to make conclusions about the effectiveness of individual models. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 on September 26, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Interagency scoping review manuscript v6 24/08/2017 Page 3 of 30 59 60 For peer review only - http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/guidelines.xhtml BMJ Open Page 4 of 75 BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019312 on 27 March 2018. Downloaded from 1 2 3 BACKGROUND 4 5 Globally, there has been increasing policy and legislative focus on inter-agency collaboration for people 6 with mental health problems coming into contact with the police and other statutory agencies such as 7 8 healthcare providers.[1-7] In recent decades in the UK and elsewhere, mental health legislation has 9 required health departments to establish jointly agreed policies with other statutory agencies to 10 11 manage people with a range of mental health problems.[3,4,8,9] 12 13 Inter-agency collaboration, also known as ‘integrated’, ‘multi-agency’ or ‘inter-professional’ 14 15 collaboration,[10,11] takes many forms [12] ranging from a low level of joint decision-making with 16 For peer review only 17 limited shared resources to multifaceted, fully-integrated services.[13,14] Regardless of the form, 18 inter-agency collaboration generally involves three core principles of information sharing, joint 19 20 decision-making and coordinated intervention.[2,15] Inter-agency collaborations involving the police 21 aim to improve health and social care outcomes for individuals with mental health problems and the 22 23 cost and effectiveness of services.[16,17] 24 25 A disproportionate number of people with mental health problems come into contact with police, who 26 27 are often the first public service to interact with such individuals. Between 20-45% of police time is 28 spent engaging with people experiencing mental health problems, as victims, witnesses or 29 30 offenders.[18] However, mental health problems are often unrecognised and poorly handled by the 31 police, meaning that many people end up incarcerated rather than receiving appropriate 32 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 33 treatment.[19] 34 35 There have been few systematic reviews of inter-agency collaboration models involving the police, 36 37 with no current registered ongoing review; so the impacts, particularly health-related, of such models 38 39 remain unclear. One review focused on guidance and research in the UK related to information-sharing 40 practices within mental health services and the organisations they work in partnership with.[20] Other on September 26, 2021 by guest.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LDF05 Settlement Hierarchy (IPGN) 2014
    Settlement Hierarchy 2014 Service Centres Northallerton Thirsk Bedale Easingwold Stokesley (with Romanby) (with Sowerby) (with Aiskew) Service Villages Brompton Carlton Miniott Crakehall Brafferton/Helperby Great Ayton East Cowton Topcliffe Kirkby Fleetham Huby Great Broughton Morton on Swale Snape Husthwaite Hutton Rudby West Tanfield Linton on Ouse Stillington Secondary Villages Appleton Wiske Bagby Burneston Alne Crathorne East Harlsey Borrowby Leeming Crayke Ingleby Arncliffe Great Smeaton Dalton Leeming Bar Raskelf West Rounton Knayton Scruton Shipton Pickhill Thornton Watlass Sutton on the Forest Sandhutton Well Tollerton Sessay South Kilvington South Otterington Other Settlements Ainderby Steeple Ainderby Quernhow Burrill Aldwark Easby Danby Wiske Balk Carthorpe Alne Station Great Busby Deighton Carlton Husthwaite Clifton on Yore Brandsby Kirkby in Cleveland East Rounton Catton Exelby Farlington Middleton-on-Leven Ellerbeck Cowesby (part Firby Flawith Newby Great Langton NYMNP) Gatenby Myton-on-Swale Picton Hornby Felixkirk Great Fencote Newton-on-Ouse Potto Kepwick (part Great Thirkleby Hackforth Oulston Rudby NYMNP) Holme Kirklington Skewsby Seamer Low Worsall Howe Langthorne Stearsby Tame Bridge Nether Silton (part Hutton Sessay Little Fencote Tholthorpe NYMNP) Kilburn (part Londonderry Thormanby Over Dinsdale NYMNP) Nosterfield Whenby Over Silton (part Kirby Wiske Sutton Howgrave Yearsley NYMNP) Little Thirkleby Theakston Streetlam Maunby Thirn Thimbleby (part Newby Wiske Thornborough NYMNP) Sinderby Thrintoft Skipton-on-Swale Welbury Sutton under Yafforth Whitestonecliffe Thirlby (part NYMNP) Thornton-le-Beans Thornton-le-Moor Thornton-le-Street Upsall .
    [Show full text]
  • Download This
    Decision Notice Template Part 1 uncontrolled copy when printed OFFICE OF POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSIONER FOR NORTH YORKSHIRE DECISION NOTICE – PART 1 RECORD OF DECISION MADE BY THE COMMISSIONER Decision Notice Number/Date (//2017) Title/Description: Re -locate the fall -back control room facility to Harrogate Police Station Executive Summary and Recommendation: This paper proposes to locate the fall -back facility of the force control room to Harrogate police station, in the event of a critical incident in York. The fall-back facility is currently located at police headquarters at Newby Wiske, but the site is being sold. Moving the facility to Harrogate ensures the right resilience is in place to guarantee North Yorkshire Police can continue to provide a telephone service to the public of North Yorkshire should the control room in York no longer be able to function. The North Yorkshire Police FCR delivers a highly professional and dedicated service 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The FCR provides the essential link with the public in handling emergency and non- emergency calls and are directly involved in managing incidents and deploying officers and resources where they are most needed. In the event of the FCR not being available the FCR fall back facility is immediately deployed. This could be due to technical, power and building issues, or an environmental incident such as flooding. Plans to vacate the Newby Wiske site also make this decision notice necessary. Recommendation: To approve the replacement of the existing Force Control Room (FCR) fall back facility with a new FCR fall back facility at Harrogate Police Station and the requisite funding to deliver this proposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish: Newby Wiske Committee Date: Thursday 10Th January 2019
    Parish: Newby Wiske Committee date: Thursday 10th January 2019 Ward: Morton on Swale Officer dealing: Miss Charlotte Cornforth th 8 Target date: Friday 11 January 2019 18/01179/FUL Demolition of bungalow and construction of three detached dwellings and garages, alterations to existing access and provision of additional vehicle accesses At Marden, Newby Wiske For Mr & Mrs J Burgess This application is referred to Planning Committee as the application is a departure from the Development Plan 1.0 SITE, CONTEXT AND PROPOSAL 1.1 The application site relates to the curtilage of an existing detached dwelling known as Marden, set in a relatively large plot fronting West View to the south of the village of Newby Wiske. Marden is set back within the site and at a 45-degree angle to West View. 1.2 The dwelling and associated driveway occupy the northern part of the site with the remainder of the site laid out as garden, which is mainly laid to grass with trees adjacent to some boundaries. 1.3 There are three trees within the application site that are the subject of Tree Preservation Orders. The one in the north-west corner is a lime tree and two on the southern boundary are birch trees. No works are proposed to these trees. 1.4 The application site extends to 0.37 hectares and is bound by the existing garden curtilages of Well House to the north and Weighbridge Cottage to the south. To the east, the site is bounded by Riverside Farm comprising of large agricultural buildings and associated hardstanding areas situated immediately to the rear of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • (Electoral Changes) Order 2000
    545297100128-09-00 23:35:58 Pag Table: STATIN PPSysB Unit: PAG1 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2000 No. 2600 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The District of Hambleton (Electoral Changes) Order 2000 Made ----- 22nd September 2000 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) Whereas the Local Government Commission for England, acting pursuant to section 15(4) of the Local Government Act 1992(a), has submitted to the Secretary of State a report dated November 1999 on its review of the district of Hambleton together with its recommendations: And whereas the Secretary of State has decided to give effect to those recommendations: Now, therefore, the Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred on him by sections 17(b) and 26 of the Local Government Act 1992, and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and interpretation 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the District of Hambleton (Electoral Changes) Order 2000. (2) This Order shall come into force— (a) for the purposes of proceedings preliminary or relating to any election to be held on 1st May 2003, on 10th October 2002; (b) for all other purposes, on 1st May 2003. (3) In this Order— “district” means the district of Hambleton; “existing”, in relation to a ward, means the ward as it exists on the date this Order is made; any reference to the map is a reference to the map prepared by the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions marked “Map of the District of Hambleton (Electoral Changes) Order 2000”, and deposited in accordance with regulation 27 of the Local Government Changes for England Regulations 1994(c); and any reference to a numbered sheet is a reference to the sheet of the map which bears that number.
    [Show full text]
  • Areas Designated As 'Rural' for Right to Buy Purposes
    Areas designated as 'Rural' for right to buy purposes Region District Designated areas Date designated East Rutland the parishes of Ashwell, Ayston, Barleythorpe, Barrow, 17 March Midlands Barrowden, Beaumont Chase, Belton, Bisbrooke, Braunston, 2004 Brooke, Burley, Caldecott, Clipsham, Cottesmore, Edith SI 2004/418 Weston, Egleton, Empingham, Essendine, Exton, Glaston, Great Casterton, Greetham, Gunthorpe, Hambelton, Horn, Ketton, Langham, Leighfield, Little Casterton, Lyddington, Lyndon, Manton, Market Overton, Martinsthorpe, Morcott, Normanton, North Luffenham, Pickworth, Pilton, Preston, Ridlington, Ryhall, Seaton, South Luffenham, Stoke Dry, Stretton, Teigh, Thistleton, Thorpe by Water, Tickencote, Tinwell, Tixover, Wardley, Whissendine, Whitwell, Wing. East of North Norfolk the whole district, with the exception of the parishes of 15 February England Cromer, Fakenham, Holt, North Walsham and Sheringham 1982 SI 1982/21 East of Kings Lynn and the parishes of Anmer, Bagthorpe with Barmer, Barton 17 March England West Norfolk Bendish, Barwick, Bawsey, Bircham, Boughton, Brancaster, 2004 Burnham Market, Burnham Norton, Burnham Overy, SI 2004/418 Burnham Thorpe, Castle Acre, Castle Rising, Choseley, Clenchwarton, Congham, Crimplesham, Denver, Docking, Downham West, East Rudham, East Walton, East Winch, Emneth, Feltwell, Fincham, Flitcham cum Appleton, Fordham, Fring, Gayton, Great Massingham, Grimston, Harpley, Hilgay, Hillington, Hockwold-Cum-Wilton, Holme- Next-The-Sea, Houghton, Ingoldisthorpe, Leziate, Little Massingham, Marham, Marshland
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire Swale Flood History 2013
    Yorkshire Swale flood history 2013 Sources The greater part of the information for the River Swale comes from a comprehensive PhD thesis by Hugh Bowen Willliams to the University of Leeds in 1957.He in turn has derived his information from newspaper reports, diaries, local topographic descriptions, minutes of Local Authority and Highway Board and, further back in time, from Quarter Sessions bridge accounts. The information is supplemented by various conversations which Williams had with farmers who owned land adjacent to the river. Where possible the height of the flood at the nearest cross- section of the place referred to in the notes is given. This has either been levelled or estimated from the available data. Together with the level above Ordnance Datum (feet) and the section in question there is given (in brackets) the height of the flood above normal water level. Information is also included from the neighbouring dales (mainly Wensleydale and Teesdale) as this gives some indication of conditions in Swaledale. Williams indicates that this is by no means a complete list, but probably contains most of the major floods in the last 200 years, together with some of the smaller ones in the last 70 years. Date and Rainfall Description sources 11 Sep 1673 Spate carried away dwelling house at Brompton-on-Swale. Burnsell Bridge on the Wharfe was washed away. North Riding Selseth Bridge in the Parish of Ranbaldkirke became ruinous by reason of the late great storm. Quarter Sessions (NRQS) ? Jul 1682 Late Brompton Bridge by the late great floods has fallen down. NRQS Speight(1891) Bridge at Brompton-on-Swale was damaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Superficial Deposits
    Mineral Resource Information in Support of National, Regional and Local Planning: North Yorkshire (comprising North Yorkshire, Yorkshire Dales and North York Moors National Parks and City of York) Commissioned Report CR/04/228N BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COMMISSIONED REPORT CR/04/228N Mineral Resource Information in Support of National, Regional and Local Planning: North Yorkshire (comprising North Yorkshire, Yorkshire Dales and North York Moors National Parks and City of York) D J Harrison, P J Henney, D Minchin, F M McEvoy, D G Cameron, S F Hobbs, D J Evans, G K Lott, E L Ball and D E Highley The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the This report accompanies the two 1:100 000 scale maps: Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. North Yorkshire (comprising North Yorkshire, Yorkshire Ordnance Survey licence number GD 272191/2006 Dales and North York Moors National Parks and City of York). Key words North Yorkshire; mineral resources; mineral planning Front cover Coldstones Quarry, Carboniferous limestones, view to southwest. North Yorkshire Bibliographical reference Harrison, D J, Henney, P J, Minchin, D, McEvoy, F M, Cameron, D G, Hobbs, S F, Evans, D J, Lott, G K, Ball, E L, and Highley, D E. 2006. Mineral Resource Information in Support of National, Regional and Local Planning: North Yorkshire (comprising North Yorkshire, Yorkshire Dales and North York Moors National Parks and City of York). British Geological Survey Commissioned Report, CR/04/228N. 24pp © Crown Copyright 2006 Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2006 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG from the BGS Sales Desks at Nottingham and Edinburgh; see contact details below or shop online 0115-936 3241 Fax 0115-936 at www.thebgs.co.uk 3488 e-mail: [email protected] The London Information Office maintains a www.bgs.ac.uk reference collection of BGS publications including Shop online at: www.thebgs.co.uk maps for consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Rose Cottage, Maunby, Thirsk, YO7 4HA Guide Price £259,000
    Rose Cottage, Maunby, Thirsk, YO7 4HA Guide price £259,000 www.joplings.com A double fronted detached cottage requiring some updating but with great potential. Located just outside the village of Maunby and with good outside space the property has beautiful far reaching views towards the Hambleton Hills. Accommodation comprises: rear porch, utility/cloakroom, inner hall, cellar, lounge, kitchen open to dining room, three bedrooms and bathroom. Gravelled area to rear allowing parking for several vehicles and caravan. Lawns to front and side, chicken run and outside store and single garage. CHAIN FREE. www.joplings.com LOCATION front. Radiator. Recessed lighting. OUTSIDE From the cross roads at South Otterington, travel KITCHEN 9'6" x 7'5" (2.90m x 2.26m) towards Newby Wiske, past the primary school REAR AREA UPVC window to the rear. Cream base and wall and church and over the little bridge. Turn left on Metal gate from roadway with concrete entrance. units with co-ordinating work surfaces and tiled the corner and continue to the T junction before Gravelled parking area providing parking for splashbacks. One and a half bowl stainless steel entering the village of Maunby. Left at this several vehicles and suitable for a caravan. Brick sink and drainer with mixer tap. Integrated junction and the property is located on the left and tile outbuilding. Chicken run area. Oil tank. electric oven and hob. Space for fridge/freezer. hand side after a quarter of a mile. Recessed lighting. Step down to Dining Area. FRONT Timber fencing to side with hand gate providing REAR PORCH AREA FIRST FLOOR A lean to porch with back door and windows to a secure garden mainly laid to lawn and side and rear.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Paul Vayro 10 Beechfield, South Otterington, North Yorkshire, DL7 9JJ
    Mr Paul Vayro 10 Beechfield, South Otterington, North Yorkshire, DL7 9JJ. Date: 20th November 2017 F.A.O. Diane Parsons North Yorkshire Police & Crime Commission c/o County Hall, Racecourse Lane, Northallerton, North Yorkshire, DL7 8AD. Dear Sirs RE: Sale of Newby Wiske Hall to PGL Travel Ltd I write again regarding the above planned sale to PGL, after attending last Thursdays NYPCC public Q & A forum in York, I am even more disgusted, with NYPCC who are after all supposed to uphold and represent the moral fibre of our society. Following the points made by Mr David Stockport, you would have thought that at least there would have been an acceptance of the points made; instead the Chairman was so indignant to the fact, that someone should dare to suggest that a public body should show even a modicum of moral fibre, in the respect of the Paradise Papers, and the massive negative effect these schemes have on Public Finances and Services, instead the response by the Chairman was, its nothing to do with us, so let’s move on. I repeat, this company are so heavily and extensively involved in a scheme to avoid paying tax in the UK, they receive tax handouts for listed buildings, significant Government subsidies for assisted places (This would be perfectly acceptable if they paid their full taxes to the UK Government), only then to operate a tax avoidance scheme, meaning we, the British tax payer, would be helping them pay even less tax, which could be used to support ALL OUR UNDERFUNDED PUBLIC SERVICES including the POLICE.
    [Show full text]
  • Maunby, Newby Wiske and South Otterington Parish Council
    Maunby, Newby Wiske and South Otterington Parish Council Minutes of the Parish Council meeting held at 7.30pm on Thursday 22nd November at the Village Hall, South Otterington Present: Councillors I. Glover (Chairman), K. Bowe, M. Harland, K. Holliday, T. Brett, C. Newton, V. Gillson, County Councillor B. Baker and District Councillor B. Phillips. Item Parish Council Meeting Minutes Action 1. Apologies: Councillor A. Shore Chairman, Iain Glover informed the meeting that Nicola Bowe is off sick. Carol Bowe acting as Temporary Clerk. 2. Minutes of Last Meeting Approval of minutes of last meeting on 18/10/2018 - Proposed Celia Newton. Seconded Vanessa Gilson. 3. Open Forum Ten minutes allocated for public consultation Pat Ovard asked about grit box. Bob Baker seen email to say it is on its way. 4. Matters arising from previous minutes Chairman, Iain Glover asked for letter of thanks to be sent to P H K Steveney and wish him well. a. Newby Wiske Hall – Update – K. Bowe - All action group documents are on portal. Awaiting response from applicant. Peter Jones informed AECOM document not on portal for full application. Lot of training activity on site - Police dogs, firearms, drones, and RSPCA the latest. 129 Associated members of Action Group. Planning Committee Site visit expected to be early January. b. South Otterington Village Signs – Update – Iain Quote £480 plus VAT for one sign. Additional £80 for Yorkshire Rose plus VAT. Fitting £95. Bob Baker – T-l-B quote from firm in Birmingham. Get more prices and ideas. On Agenda for next meeting. c. Report back regarding Defibrillator - Update – V.
    [Show full text]
  • (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1997 No. 624 HOUSING, ENGLAND AND WALES The Housing (Right to Acquire or Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997 Made - - - - 5th March 1997 Laid before Parliament 7th March 1997 Coming into force - - 1st April 1997 The Secretary of State for the Environment, as respects England, in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 17 of the Housing Act 1996(1) and section 1AA(3)(a) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967(2) and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, hereby makes the following Order— Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Housing (Right to Acquire or Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st April 1997. Designated rural areas 2. The following areas shall be designated rural areas for the purposes of section 17 of the Housing Act 1996 (the right to acquire) and section 1AA(3)(a) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (additional right to enfranchise)— (a) the parishes in the districts of the East Riding of Yorkshire, Hartlepool, Middlesborough, North East Lincolnshire, North Lincolnshire, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees specified in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, VI and VII of Schedule 1 to this Order and in the counties of Durham, Northumberland, North Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, Tyne and Wear and West Yorkshire specified in Parts VIII, IX, X, XI,
    [Show full text]
  • North Yorkshire Police
    PEEL: Police efficiency (including leadership) 2017 An inspection of North Yorkshire Police November 2017 © HMICFRS 2017 ISBN: 978-1-78655-464-2 www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmicfrs Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................. 3 Force in numbers ..................................................................................................... 5 Overview – How efficient is the force at keeping people safe and reducing crime? ....................................................................................................................... 6 How well does the force understand demand? ..................................................... 8 How well does the force understand current demand? ........................................... 8 How well does the force understand things that affect demand? .......................... 12 Summary of findings ............................................................................................. 14 How well does the force use its resources? ........................................................ 15 How well does the force understand the capability of its workforce? .................... 15 How well does the force understand the capability of its leaders? ........................ 18 How well does the force allocate resources? ........................................................ 19 How well does the force work with others? ........................................................... 22 Summary of findings
    [Show full text]