Zoo Station Free
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Retrospective of Preservation Practice and the New York City Subway System
Under the Big Apple: a Retrospective of Preservation Practice and the New York City Subway System by Emma Marie Waterloo This thesis/dissertation document has been electronically approved by the following individuals: Tomlan,Michael Andrew (Chairperson) Chusid,Jeffrey M. (Minor Member) UNDER THE BIG APPLE: A RETROSPECTIVE OF PRESERVATION PRACTICE AND THE NEW YORK CITY SUBWAY SYSTEM A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Emma Marie Waterloo August 2010 © 2010 Emma Marie Waterloo ABSTRACT The New York City Subway system is one of the most iconic, most extensive, and most influential train networks in America. In operation for over 100 years, this engineering marvel dictated development patterns in upper Manhattan, Brooklyn, and the Bronx. The interior station designs of the different lines chronicle the changing architectural fashion of the aboveground world from the turn of the century through the 1940s. Many prominent architects have designed the stations over the years, including the earliest stations by Heins and LaFarge. However, the conversation about preservation surrounding the historic resource has only begun in earnest in the past twenty years. It is the system’s very heritage that creates its preservation controversies. After World War II, the rapid transit system suffered from several decades of neglect and deferred maintenance as ridership fell and violent crime rose. At the height of the subway’s degradation in 1979, the decision to celebrate the seventy-fifth anniversary of the opening of the subway with a local landmark designation was unusual. -
Download Press Release
State/Federal Help Still Available for Oregon Wildfire Survivors Release Date: January 7, 2021 SALEM, Ore. – Resources are still available to assist the survivors of 2020’s devastating wildfires. The Oregon Office of Emergency Management and FEMA continue to work together on assistance with housing, property damage, flood insurance, free counseling, pro-bono legal aid and case management. State, Local and Community Resources Free Crisis Counseling is Available: The Safe+Strong Helpline is available for both children and adults who are struggling with stress, anxiety or other disaster-related depression-like symptoms. The website offers free and confidential resources to help wildfire survivors on the road to recovery. For help, call 800-923-4357 or visit https://www.safestrongoregon.org/wildfire. Debris Hotline: The Debris Management Task Force hotline remains open and available 24/7 for cleanup questions and information. Call 503-934-1700 or find additional information on the new debris cleanup website at: http://wildfire.oregon.gov/cleanup. Disaster Legal Assistance: Disaster Legal Services is taking questions from wildfire survivors. Go to: oregondisasterlegalservices.org, or call 800-452-7636 or 503-684-3763 , Monday through Friday 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. 211info: 211info is a nonprofit organization funded by state and municipal contracts, foundations, United Ways, donations and community partners in Oregon and Southwest Washington. 211info empowers Oregon and Southwest Washington communities by helping people identify, navigate and connect with the local resources they need. To speak with a community information specialist about resources in your area: call 211 or 866-698-6155; text your zip code to 898211; or email [email protected]. -
Adobe Trademark Database for General Distribution
Adobe Trademark List for General Distribution As of May 17, 2021 Please refer to the Permissions and trademark guidelines on our company web site and to the publication Adobe Trademark Guidelines for third parties who license, use or refer to Adobe trademarks for specific information on proper trademark usage. Along with this database (and future updates), they are available from our company web site at: https://www.adobe.com/legal/permissions/trademarks.html Unless you are licensed by Adobe under a specific licensing program agreement or equivalent authorization, use of Adobe logos, such as the Adobe corporate logo or an Adobe product logo, is not allowed. You may qualify for use of certain logos under the programs offered through Partnering with Adobe. Please contact your Adobe representative for applicable guidelines, or learn more about logo usage on our website: https://www.adobe.com/legal/permissions.html Referring to Adobe products Use the full name of the product at its first and most prominent mention (for example, “Adobe Photoshop” in first reference, not “Photoshop”). See the “Preferred use” column below to see how each product should be referenced. Unless specifically noted, abbreviations and acronyms should not be used to refer to Adobe products or trademarks. Attribution statements Marking trademarks with ® or TM symbols is not required, but please include an attribution statement, which may appear in small, but still legible, print, when using any Adobe trademarks in any published materials—typically with other legal lines such as a copyright notice at the end of a document, on the copyright page of a book or manual, or on the legal information page of a website. -
Enu1 U4 Layout 1
BAUER REVIEW FOR EMPLOYEES AND FRIENDS OF THE BAUER GROUP COMPANIES 2010 40 Contents Status report 5 20 years since reunification 6 Thomas Bauer on reunification 20 20 years of environmental technology 23 Construction in southern Germany 24 Bauma 2010 26 Equipment for customer use 28 Projects all over the world 30 Bauer Resources 38 25 years of cutter technology 40 Central Services 41 News in brief 43 In-house news ctober 3rd, 1990 culminated in a massive fireworks display and Oringing of bells throughout the country. Less than 11 months after the fall of the Berlin Wall, East and West Germany – which as a result of the Sec- ond World War had endured 40 years of separation and confrontation – were now reunited. Even before the official reunification took place, Bauer, like many companies in West Germany, had been very keen to move into the former German Demo- cratic Republic (GDR) firstly in order to expand its markets and, secondly, to assist in the transition from a planned economy to a free market economy. Twenty years on, this Review looks at how Bauer went about this undertaking, returning once again to focus on the early days of the reunification process. The story is told not so much on the basis of documents and records, but rather through the voices of the man- agers responsible for running the busi- ness at the time. Most of them are still in senior management posts today, though some have retired. Witnesses on the Schrobenhausen side who were consulted in compiling the report in- cluded Chairman of the Management Board Thomas Bauer and Heinz Kalten - ecker, as well as Wolfgang Brunner, Alexander Hofer, Josef Goller and Ernst Stümpfle. -
Travel Guide Berlin
The U2tour.de Travel Guide Berlin English Version Version Januar 2020 © U2tour.de The U2Tour.de – Travel Guide Berlin The U2Tour.de Travel Guide Berlin You're looking for traces of U2? Finally in Berlin and don't know where to go? Or are you travelling in Berlin and haven't found Kant Kino? This has now come to an end, because now there is the U2Tour.de- Travel Guide, which should help you with your search. At the moment there are 20 U2 sights in our database, which will be constantly extended and updated with your help. Original photos and pictures from different years tell the story of every single place. You will also receive the exact addresses, a spot on the map and directions. So it should be possible for every U2 fan to find these points with ease. Credits Texts: Dietmar Reicht, Björn Lampe, Florian Zerweck, Torsten Schlimbach, Carola Schmidt, Hans ' Hasn' Becker, Shane O'Connell, Anne Viefhues, Oliver Zimmer. Pictures und Updates: Dietmar Reicht, Shane O'Connell, Thomas Angermeier, Mathew Kiwala (Bodie Ghost Town), Irv Dierdorff (Joshua Tree), Brad Biringer (Joshua Tree), Björn Lampe, S. Hübner (RDS), D. Bach (Slane), Joe St. Leger (Slane), Jan Année , Sven Humburg, Laura Innocenti, Michael Sauter, bono '61, AirMJ, Christian Kurek, Alwin Beck, Günther R., Stefan Harms, acktung, Kraft Gerald, Silvia Kruse, Nicole Mayer, Kay Mootz, Carola Schmidt, Oliver Zimmer and of course Anton Corbijn and Paul Slattery. Maps from : Google Maps, Mapquest.com, Yahoo!, Loose Verlag, Bay City Guide, Down- townla.com, ViaMichelin.com, Dorling Kindersley, Pharus Plan Media, Falk Routenplaner Screencaps : Rattle & Hum (Paramount Pictures), The Unforgettable Fire / U2 Go Home DVD (Uni- versal/Island), Pride Video, October Cover, Best Of 1990-2000 Booklet, The Unforgettable Fire Cover, Beautiful Day Video, u.v.m. -
Statement of Adam Clayton Powell, Iii
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) 2006 Quadrennial Regulatory Review – Review ) MB Docket No. 06-121 of the Commission’s Broadcast Ownership ) Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to ) Section 202 of the Telecommunications ) Act of 1996 ) ) 2002 Biennial Regulatory Review – Review ) MB Docket No. 02-277 of the Commission’s Broadcast Ownership ) Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to ) Section 202 of the Telecommunications ) Act of 1996 ) ) Cross-Ownership of Broadcast Stations ) MM Docket No. 01-235 and Newspapers ) ) Rules and Policies Concerning Multiple ) MM Docket No. 01-317 Ownership of Radio Broadcast Stations ) in Local Markets ) ) Definition of Radio Markets ) MM Docket No. 00-244 COMMENTS OF MEDIA GENERAL, INC. (Volume 2: Statement of Professor Adam Clayton Powell, III, Appendix 4A with Exhibits) . John R. Feore, Jr. Michael D. Hays M. Anne Swanson Daniel A. Kirkpatrick Dow Lohnes PLLC 1200 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036-6802 (202) 776-2534 Its Attorneys October 23, 2006 Appendix 4A STATEMENT OF ADAM CLAYTON POWELL, III I am the Director of the Integrated Media Systems Center, the National Science Foundation’s Engineering Research Center for multimedia research, at the University of Southern California’s Viterbi School of Engineering. I am also a Senior Fellow at the USC Center on Public Diplomacy and served until last year as a Visiting Professor of Journalism at the University of Southern California’s Annenberg School of Communications. Previously, I served as general manager of WHUT-TV, Washington, D.C., and KMTP-TV, San Francisco, California, the nation’s first and second African American-owned public television stations, respectively. -
Unit 3: Nfip Flood Studies and Maps
UNIT 3: NFIP FLOOD STUDIES AND MAPS In this unit This unit describes the flood data, studies, and maps that the National Flood Insurance Program provides to communities to assist them in carrying out their floodplain management program. It reviews: i Flood study and map terminology, i How flood studies are prepared along riverine floodplains, i How flood studies are prepared on coastal floodplains, and i How the NFIP maps display the study data. Materials needed for this unit i Flood Insurance Study, Flood County, USA and Incorporated Areas i Flood Insurance Rate Map, Flood County, USA and Incorporated Areas Flood Studies and Maps 3-1 Contents A. NFIP Flood Studies ................................................................................................................. 3-3 Flood Study Terminology...................................................................................................... 3-3 The base flood ................................................................................................................. 3-3 The 100-year flood .......................................................................................................... 3-4 Special flood hazard area and base flood elevation......................................................... 3-4 Identifying Floodprone Areas ................................................................................................ 3-5 Flood Insurance Study..................................................................................................... 3-7 Flood County, -
Enclosure to Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 MSFHI Letter
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 & 3 Table 1. Current Design Basis Flood Hazards for Use in the MSA Mechanism Stillwater Waves/ Design Basis Reference Elevation Runup Hazard Elevation Local Intense Precipitation Not included Not included Not included Flood Hazard Reevaulation Report in DB in DB in DB (FHRR) Revision 2, Section 4.1.1 Streams and Rivers Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) 12.7 ft 1.0 ft 13.7 ft FHRR Revision 2, Section 2.3.1 and on the Hudson River NGVD29 NGVD29 Table 4.1-1 PMF with Low Tide on the 13.0 ft 1.0 ft 14.0 ft FHRR Revision 2, Section 2.3.1 and Hudson River NGVD29 NGVD29 Table 4.1-1 PMF with High Tide on the 12.4 ft 1.0 ft 13.4 ft FHRR Revision 2, Section 2.3.1 and Hudson River NGVD29 NGVD29 Table 4.1-1 Failure of Dams and Onsite Water Control/Storage Structures REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED Storm Surge Probable Maximum Hurricane 13.5 ft 1.0 ft 14.5 ft FHRR Revision 2, Section 2.3.1 and (PMH) with Spring High Tide on NGVD29 NGVD29 Table 4.1-1 the Hudson River Standard Project Hurricane and 13.0 ft 1.0 ft 14.0 ft FHRR Revision 2, Section 2.3.1 and Standard Project Flood on the NGVD29 NGVD29 Table 4.1-1 Hudson River REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED 1 Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 & 3 Table 1. Current Design Basis Flood Hazards for Use in the MSA Mechanism Stillwater Waves/ Design Basis Reference Elevation Runup Hazard Elevation Seiche Not included Not included Not included FHRR Revision 2, Section 4.1.5 in DB in DB in DB Tsunami Not included Not included Not included FHRR Revision 2, Section 4.1.6 in DB in DB in DB Ice-Induced Flooding Not included Not included Not included FHRR Revision 2, Section 4.1.7 in DB in DB in DB Channel Migrations/Diversions Not included Not included Not included FHRR Revision 2, Section 4.1.8 in DB in DB in DB Note 1: Reported values are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a foot. -
External Locations of Modern Railway Stations – a Departure from Sustainable Mobility?
Systemy transportowe Jacek Wesołowski External locations of modern railway stations – a departure from sustainable mobility? Will people come to the railway regardless of station location or in 1894. Rotterdam was a rare example of a long cross-city line should rather the railway come to where people are? The pursue for built on iron viaduct (1877; line relocated underground in 1993). central locations for stations was probably the most characteristic The long lasting ‘battle’ of railways with authorities of Paris, won feature of Victorian railways urging them to cover huge costs of in- by the latter, is particularly emblematic. Mainline railways have ner city lots and approaches. It has been often stressed the station to wait till the 1970s to gain access directly to the heart of the has changed it character becoming far more than the pure trans- city which materialised in a limited form as a big suburban hub at port node. The evolution towards a retail and service centre was Châtelet-les-Halles. In the last decades of the 19th century even possible thanks to its inner city location [1]. Recent developments a reverse tendency was born, to whom good excuse were the in some countries with most advanced railway systems show that need for large areas for central stations and the need to free the modern stations are often neither central nor even easily accessible. cities from any physical constraints for expansion. Truncation of The time gained on quick train travel and lack of check in times is inner parts of railways approaching Frankfurt am Main in order then lost by most customers on long access travels. -
Legal Requirements for Equitable Design and Implementation of Flood Buyout Programs in Rhode Island
Legal Requirements for Equitable Design and Implementation of Flood Buyout Programs in Rhode Island June 2020 This study is a product of the Marine Affairs Institute at Roger Williams University School of Law and the Rhode Island Sea Grant Legal Program. Sarah Friedman, Rhode Island Sea Grant Law Fellow, authored this study with guidance from Read Porter, Senior Staff Attorney. All errors and omissions are the responsibility of the Marine Affairs Institute. This study is provided only for informational and educational purposes and is not legal advice. This study was prepared by the Marine Affairs Institute under an agreement with the Rhode Island Office of Housing and Community Development. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the state of Rhode Island. About the Marine Affairs Institute The Marine Affairs Institute serves as a comprehensive clearinghouse for marine law and policy whose mission is to: • Educate the next generation of marine law and policy professionals both within the classroom and in the community; • Serve as a legal and policy resource for the marine community by producing high quality research in partnership with stakeholders in Rhode Island, New England, the US, and around the world; and • Convene diverse experts to discuss cutting-edge issues in marine law and policy. As an academic and research institution, MAI does not litigate or advocate. Instead, it provides high- quality research and analysis to inform the legal and policy debate. MAI is a partnership of Roger Williams University School of Law, The University of Rhode Island (URI), and Rhode Island Sea Grant. -
Optimierungsbedarf an Stationen Mit Unter 50 Ein- Und Aussteigern Pro Tag
Abb. 5.2: Optimierungsbedarf an Stationen mit unter 50 Ein- und Aussteigern pro Tag 80 VERKEHRSINFRASTRUKTUR bare Bahnsteiglängen von mindestens 60 m bis maximal 170 m gebaut. Das Land Brandenburg prüft den Einsatz von Doppelstockwendezügen mit sechs Wagen neben dem RE 1 [Magdeburg Pots- dam – Frankfurt (Oder)] auch für den RE 5 (Elsterwerda – Rostock) in den Sommermo- naten sowie den Einsatz von Doppelstock- wendezügen mit fünf Wagen für den RE 3 (Lutherstadt Wittenberg – Angermünde – Stralsund), um dem Verkehrsbedürfnis auf diesen Verbindungen Rechnung zu tragen. Die notwendigen Bahnsteiglängen sind an diesen Strecken bei neuen Anlagen zu be- rücksichtigen. Bild 5.4: Neue Bahnsteiganlage Bahnhof Prenzlau Auf den übrigen Strecken mit elektrischem Regionalexpressverkehr (RE 2, RE 4, RE 7, RE 11, RE 15 und RE 18) sind grundsätzlich Bahnsteiglängen für Doppelstockwendezü- ge mit vier Einzelwagen plus Lokomotive zu berücksichtigen. Gleiches gilt für die nicht elektrifizierte Ostbahn (RB 26). Auf dem die- selbetriebenen RE 6 (PrignitzExpress) sind die bisher realisierten Bahnsteiglängen mit 100 m Nutzlänge ausreichend. Mit dieser Bahnsteiglänge ist auch für die Regionalbah- nen RB 12, 33, 35, 36, 46, 51, 54, 65 und 66 zu planen, während für die Regionalbahnen 25, 27, 60 und 63 Bahnsteiglängen von 85 m ausreichen. Die im LNVP enthaltenen Angaben zu Bahn- steiglängen und -höhen berücksichtigen nur die aus dem SPNV erwachsenden Anforde- rungen. VERKEHRSINFRASTRUKTUR 81 Abb. 5.3: Ausbaustand der Bahnsteige 82 VERKEHRSINFRASTRUKTUR Abb. 5.4: Konzept Bahnsteighöhen und -längen VERKEHRSINFRASTRUKTUR 83 6. Zielkonzepte 6.1 Weiterentwicklung des integrierten träger des üÖPNV gemeinsam mit dem Verkehrssystems Aufgabenträger des SPNV zu erstellen. • VBB Die im LNVP 2008 – 2012 begonnenen Po- Im Auftrag der Länder Berlin und Branden- tenzialanalysen für einzelne Linien als Kor- burg bestellt der VBB den Regional- und ridoruntersuchung haben sich bewährt und den S-Bahnverkehr. -
Ensuring That Structures Built on Fill in Or Near Special Flood Hazard Areas Are Reasonably Safe from Flooding in Accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program
Technical Bulletin 10-01 Ensuring That Structures Built on Fill In or Near Special Flood Hazard Areas Are Reasonably Safe From Flooding in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FIA-TB-10 MITIGATION DIRECTORATE (5/01) Key Word/Subject Index This index allows the user to locate key words and subjects in this Technical Bulletin. The Technical Bulletin User’s Guide (printed separately) provides references to key words and subjects throughout the Technical Bulletins. For definitions of selected terms, refer to the Glossary at the end of this bulletin. Key Word/Subject Index Page Basement construction, engineered option 19 Basement construction, simplified approach 15 Basement foundation in fill, not recommended 9 Basement foundation in fill, vulnerability to subsurface flooding 1, 9 Basement foundation, in fill placed above BFE 10 Basement foundation, with lowest floor at or above BFE 10 Basement foundation, with lowest opening above BFE 11 Basement foundation, with lowest opening at BFE 12 Community permitting, administrative options for 5 Crawlspace foundation 7 Fill, placed to remove land from the SFHA 1 Fill, areas where prohibited 3 Fill, proper placement of 5 Foundation flood risk, summary table 13 Freeboard, recommendations 6 Insurance coverage for basement flooding, restrictions 9 Professional certification 4 Professional certification, sample form 4 “Reasonably safe from flooding,” defined 2 “Reasonably safe from flooding,” NFIP regulations concerning 2 Slab-on-grade foundation 8 Stem wall foundation 7 Sump pump, requirements for simplified basement construction 15 Any comments on the Technical Bulletins should be directed to: Federal Emergency Management Agency Mitigation Directorate Program Policy and Assessment Branch 500 C Street, SW.