Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Paper Artifacts Cleaning Shi-Wei Su
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Precision Cleaning Applications
CHAPTER 3 PRECISION CLEANING APPLICATIONS 3.1. BACKGROUND Precision cleaning applications are characterised by the extremely fine level of cleanliness required to keep delicate instruments and surfaces operating effectively. Although precision cleaning is needed in a wide variety of industries, several key factors define the applications where precision cleaning is required. These include those applications in which (1) critical cleanliness standards of particulate and/or organic contaminants need to be satisfied, (2) components have sensitive compatibilities, (3) components I $ have physical characteristics such as geometry and porosity which make dewatering crucial in the cleaning process, and (4) components being cleaned are costly. A variety of particulate and nonparticulate contaminants are removed in precision cleaning operations. Particulate contamination includes scrap material created during cutting, drilling, grinding, and buffing of precision parts (e.g., silicon wafers and aluminum storage disk substrates). Nonparticulate contamination includes waxes, finger print oils, and other contaminants. As the term suggests precision cleaning involves cleaning components to extremely strict standards of cleanliness. A good indication of the cleaning ability required for precision cleaning processes is provided in Figure 111-1, which shows the clearance on a computer disk drive relative to the size of various contaminants. The factor that made CFC-113 the precision cleaning solvent of choice is its remarkable chemical stability (manifested directly in its compatibility to structural materials), its low toxicity, and zero flammability. This has * 1991 UNEP SOLVENTS. COATINGS, AND ADHESIVES REPORT * -1 31- Figure III-I SIZE COMPARISON OF COMPUTER DISK DRIVE HEAD CLEARANCE WITH VARIOUS CONTAMINANTS ' !! allowed closed, superclean, white-room assembly areas to be operated safely and effectively. -
Cleaning with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide
Cleaning with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Ken Laintz and Dale Spall Los Alamos NATIONAL LABORATORY Chemical Science and Technology Organic Analytical Chemistry CST-12, MS E537 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 (505) 665-3545, FAX (505) 667-6561 Outline Supercritical Fluids Cleaning Operations using Supercritial Fluid Solvents Experimental Cleaning Results Other Cleaning Applications Significant Properties of Supercritical Fluids 0 High diffusivity results in high mass transfer 0 Low viscosity and surface tension results in small pore penetration 0 High density results in solvent properties similar to liquids 0 Density is a selective function of temperature and pressure Solute Extraction and Removal Kinetics Extraction Time Operational Economics of Cleaning Prospects Direct Labor Indirect Labor Factory Costs Labor Expenses Benefits Factory Overhead Depreciation Cycle Time Costs Maintenance New Technology Changeover Costs Facility Space Costs Consumables Consumables Disposal Costs Liability Costs Utilities Energy and Utilities Aqueous Supercritical CO2 Taxes and Fees Administration Semi-aqueous Finance Capital Costs Finance Charges Quality Cost of Quality JAAST Joint Association for the Advancement of Supercritical Fluid Technology Mission: To develop and disseminate SCF cleaning applications in support of environmentally conscious manufacturing to meet the needs of the government and industry Members Hughes Aerospace Applied Separations DOE U. Mass. Lowell Allied Signal Autoclave Engineers EPA U. South Carolina Ciba Vision CF Technologies SNL -
Use of 90% Ethanol to Decontaminate Stethoscopes in Resource Limited
Raghubanshi et al. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control (2017) 6:68 DOI 10.1186/s13756-017-0224-x RESEARCH Open Access Use of 90% ethanol to decontaminate stethoscopes in resource limited settings Bijendra Raj Raghubanshi, Supriya Sapkota, Arjab Adhikari*, Aman Dutta, Utsuk Bhattarai and Rastriyata Bhandari Abstract Background: In developing countries like Nepal, 90% ethanol is cheap and is available in most hospitals. The unavailability of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) in these settings led us to compare the efficacy between 90% ethanol and isopropyl alcohol pads in reducing the bacterial contamination of diaphragm of stethoscope. Methods: A randomized blinded experimental study was carried out to determine the difference between cleaning stethoscopes with 90% ethanol and IPA. Cultures of diaphragm were taken before and after cleaning with one of the cleaning agent. Colony forming units (CFU) count and organism identification was done by a blinded investigator. CFU before and after cleaning were compared using Wilcoxon signed–rank test. Mann Whitney U test was used to compare the decrease in CFU count between the cleaning agents. Results: About 30% of the stethoscopes harbored potential pathogens. Significant reduction in CFU was observed with both IPA (Wilcoxon signed–rank test, P value <0.001) and 90% ethanol (Wilcoxon signed–rank test, P value <0. 001). Comparing median decrease in CFU between cleaning with IPA and with 90% ethanol, no significant difference was found (Mann Whitney U test; U = 1357, P value >0.05). Conclusions: Both 90% ethanol and IPA are equally effective in decontaminating the diaphragm of stethoscope. Selection of agent should be done on the basis of cost and availability. -
Chemical Disinfectant and Cleaning Agent Safety – Frequently Asked Questions
Caribbean Public Health Agency Technical Guidance: COVID-19 Series No 33 Chemical Disinfectant and Cleaning Agent Safety – Frequently Asked Questions Suggested Citation: CARPHA. (2020). Chemical disinfectant and cleaning agent safety – frequently asked questions. Caribbean Public Health Agency Technical Guidance: COVID-19 Series, no. 33. CARPHA 2020 Chemical Disinfectant and Cleaning Agent Safety – Frequently Asked Questions 9 July 2020 Why are we concerned about cleaning agents and disinfectants? Selecting the correct chemical agent for cleaning and disinfecting and safely handling and using that agent is essential to health and wellbeing. Recently, with the increased focus on cleaning to reduce the risk of exposure to coronavirus disease, there have been an associated increase in media stories warning the public of the dangerous chemicals used for disinfectants. All chemical cleaning agents can be harmful to the health of the person using the product if it is not used as directed on the label by the manufacturer. Chemical agents can cause burns, breathing difficulties or damage to the lungs, or possibly result in poisoning. Persons should carefully read instructions for use, safety data sheets, and any health warnings to ensure they have selected the correct chemical agents, have the appropriate personal protection, and use and store the chemicals in a safe way. What are the properties of effective chemical cleaning agents and disinfectants? A wide variety of chemical agents can be used for cleaning, sanitising, and disinfecting. There are 4 categories of cleaners: detergents, degreasers, abrasives, and acids. Each is effective for cleaning different surfaces depending on the type of soiling. Different chemical agents are effective for killing different bacteria and viruses.1 Molds and fungus will require a sporicidal agent2. -
Development and Design of a High Pressure Carbon Dioxide System for the Separation of Hazardous Contaminants from Non-Hazardous Debris*
DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN OF A HIGH PRESSURE CARBON DIOXIDE SYSTEM FOR THE SEPARATION OF HAZARDOUS CONTAMINANTS FROM NON-HAZARDOUS DEBRIS* Carol L. J. Adkins and Edward M. Russick <~~ 'f\ «//) - cj^'- - / ^ 61 Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM -^ " H. Mike Smith and Ron B. Olson AlliedSignal Inc., Kansas City Division, Kansas City, MO ABSTRACT Under the Department of Energy (DOE)AJnited States Air Force (USAF) Memorandum of Understanding, a system is being designed that will use high pressure carbon dioxide for the separation of oils, greases, and solvents from non-hazardous solid waste. The contaminants are dissolved into the high pressure carbon dioxide and precipitated out upon depressurization. The carbon dioxide solvent can then be recycled for continued use. Excellent extraction capability for common manufacturing oils, greases, and solvents has been measured. It has been observed that extraction performance follows the dilution model if a constant flow system is used. The solvents tested are extremely soluble and have been extracted to 100% under both liquid and mild supercritical carbon dioxide conditions. These data are being used to design a 200 liter extraction system. KEY WORDS: Supercritical, Carbon dioxide, Cleaning 1. INTRODUCTION Large quantities of solid wastes such as rags, kimwipes, swabs, coveralls, gloves, etc., contaminated with oils, greases and hazardous solvents are generated by industry and the government. At present, these materials must be treated as hazardous waste, and the cost of disposal of such large volumes of hazardous materials is high. If the hazardous components (oils, greases and solvents) could be segregated from the much larger bulk of non-hazardous material, then these solid materials could potentially be handled as sanitary waste at significant cost savings. -
VOLUME 2 Cleaning Agents, Sanitisers and Disinfectants in Food Businesses: Detection of Traces and Human Risk Assessment Processes
Chemicals in Food Hygiene VOLUME 2 Cleaning agents, sanitisers and disinfectants in food businesses: detection of traces and human risk assessment processes Chemicals in Food Hygiene – Volume 2 Foreword The Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) is a considering carry-over risks of traces in non-profit industry association tasked with foods; promoting continuous improvement of food ➢ Reviewed and identified gaps in the safety management systems to ensure suitability of existing methods for confidence in the delivery of safe food to detection of traces at relevant points in consumers worldwide. GFSI provides a the food production process; platform for collaboration between some of ➢ Developed the GFSI position on the use of the world’s leading food safety experts from cleaning agents, sanitisers and retailer, producers and food service disinfectants and the relationship with companies, service providers associated with microbial resistance. the food supply chain, international organisations, academia and government. The TWG produced 2 volumes within one document: Since GFSI’s inception in 2000, experts from all over the world have been collaborating in ➢ Volume one of this document provides a numerous Technical Working Groups (TWG) high-level overview of the considerations to tackle current food safety issues defined that a food business operator needs to by GFSI stakeholders. In 2017 a TWG was consider in relation to ensuring established to determine best practices in appropriate hygienic practices. This relation to biocides (defined as the residues volume is aimed at a variety of readers from cleaning agents, sanitisers and from the food truck operator or farmer disinfectants) in the food supply chain. -
Knolltextiles Cleaning Information
Cleaning Information Regular Maintenance It is important to vacuum upholstery regularly to remove the surface dust that builds up and slowly contributes to a greying effect that diminishes the clarity of the original color. Please note that vacuuming should be done with the proper attachments to avoid breaking down the fibers and contributing to “pilling.” In addition to regular vacuuming, a professional cleaner should come in at least once or twice a year to thoroughly clean the fabrics and remove the soiling that a normal vacuum cleaner cannot reach. The expense of this service is small compared to the reward of seating that looks good as new after a lot of use. Cleaning Codes W: Water-based cleaning agents or foam may be used for cleaning this fabric. S: Only mild, pure water-free dry cleaning solvents may be used for cleaning this fabric. W-S: Water-based cleaning agents and foam or mild, waterfree solvents may be used for cleaning this fabric. W Bleach: Water-based or foam cleaning agents or diluted household bleach may be used for cleaning this fabric. W-S Bleach: Clean with water or solvent-based cleaning agents or diluted household bleach. X: This fabric should be vacuumed or brushed lightly to remove soil. Warning: Do not use water-based foam or liquid cleaning agents of any type on this fabric. Cleaning vs Sanitizing vs Disinfecting Cleaning, disinfecting and sanitizing are often used synonymously, but they are not the same thing. Cleaning removes the visible foreign matter from a surface. Disinfecting, when done according to the instructions of a suitable cleaner, kills all bacteria and viruses present, while sanitizing reduces the level of bacteria and viruses present. -
Supercritical Fluid Carbon Dioxide Cleaning of Plutonium Parts
I SUPERCRITICAL FLUID CARBON DIOXIDE BACKGROUND CLEANING OF PLUTONIUM PARTS A supercritical fluid is the comprcssed, dense gas phase Stephanie J. Hale above the critical temperature. Liquefaction of a gas can EG&G Rocky Flats, Inc occur upon compression below the critical temperature, but above the critical temperature the gas cannot liquefy regardleas of the applied pressure and a single gas phase is ABSTRACT maintained. The critical point for carbon dioxide is 31'C and 74 bar (1088 psi) which means that the supercritical Supercritical fluid carbon dioxide is under investigation in fluid can be aUnined under relatively mild conditions. this work for use as a cleaning solvent for the final cleaning of plutonium parts. These parts must be free of The phase diagram of CO, (Figure 1) shows the organic residue to avoid cormsion in the stockpile. Initial supcrcritical region above 74 bar and the 32" isotherm. It studies on stainless steel and full-scale mock-up parts can be seen that very liquid-like densities can be achieved indicate that the oils of interest are easily and adequately and still remain in the gas phase. cleaned from the metal surfaces with supercritical fluid carbon dioxide. Results from compatibility studies show that undesirable oxidation or other surface mctions are not occurring during cxposureof plutonium to the supercritical fluid. Cleaning studies indicate that the oils of interest are Temperalure ' removed from the plutonium surface under relatively mild conditions. These studies indicate that supercritical fluid carbon dioxide is a very promising cleaning medium for this application. INTRODUCTION Our aim in this work is to develop a cleaning process that van u-o clean plutonium parts. -
Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Precision Cleaning for Solvent and Waste Reduction
'1 *, - .L**LIL. I,.. .. ." larernarional Journal of Environmentally Consciaus Design & Manufacturing. Vol. 2, No. 1. pp, 8 1-86. 1993 Printed in the U.S.A. .. mest- -. Pollution Prevention Research Center 1326 Ftfth Avenue, Sutre 650 Seattle, WA 98101 (206)223-1 151 SUPERCRITICALCARBONDIOXIDE PRECISIONCLEANING FOR SOLVENT ANDWASTE REDUCTION W. DALESPALL Los ALAMOSNATIONAL LABORATORY Los ALAMOS,NM 87545 Murph?s Law of Cleaning: You can't get thepart cleanerthan the dishwater, but is itpossible to get both the part and the dishwater dirty. Supercritical carbon dioxide as a cleaning solvent offers many advantages for the cleaning of selected materials. This paper discusses the applicability ofsupercritical carbon dioxide to precision cleaning of a wide variety of parts. The economics involved and a description of the work in progress is included. INTRODUCTION after cleaning. Specifications such as this lead to many Ascetics, performance, improved work life, product parts being overcleaned, while others are undercleaned. specifications, and marketing strategies are among the The rigidity of specifications often rests on habitual prac- many reasons to clean an object. Currently, cleaning tices rather than actual needs. Specifications should con- technologies can be divided into two broad categories, sider how clean a part needs to be to meet speicific aqueous and non-aqueous based. These technologies requirements on the whole. This should lead to more face an upheaval brought on by imposition of the Montreal cleaning for some parts, but to less cleaning for most parts. Protocol, which restricts or prevents the use of chlo- Because theentire cleaning process is now at question, rofluorocarbons (CFCs) for all uses, from refrigerants to manufacturing engineers should seize this oppofluniiy to dry cleaning. -
Safety Data Sheet Quaternary Disinfectant Cleaner
SAFETY DATA SHEET QUATERNARY DISINFECTANT CLEANER SECTION 1. PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Product name : QUATERNARY DISINFECTANT CLEANER Other means of identification : Not applicable Recommended use : Disinfectant Restrictions on use : Reserved for industrial and professional use. Product dilution information : 0.39 % - 1.54 % Company : Ecolab Inc. 1 Ecolab Place St. Paul, Minnesota USA 55102 1-800-352-5326 Emergency health : 1-800-328-0026 (US/Canada), 1-651-222-5352 (outside US) information Issuing date : 03/01/2021 SECTION 2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION GHS Classification Product AS SOLD Flammable liquids : Category 3 Acute toxicity (Oral) : Category 4 Acute toxicity (Dermal) : Category 4 Skin corrosion : Category 1A Serious eye damage : Category 1 Product AT USE DILUTION Acute toxicity (Dermal) : Category 4 Eye irritation : Category 2B GHS label elements Product AS SOLD Hazard pictograms : Signal Word : Danger Hazard Statements : Flammable liquid and vapor. Harmful if swallowed or in contact with skin. Causes severe skin burns and eye damage. Precautionary Statements : Prevention: Keep away from heat/ sparks/ open flames/ hot surfaces. No smoking. Keep container tightly closed. Ground/bond container and receiving equipment. Use explosion-proof electrical/ ventilating/ lighting/ equipment. Use only non-sparking tools. Take precautionary measures against static discharge. Wash skin thoroughly after handling. Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product. Wear 913496 1 / 13 SAFETY DATA SHEET QUATERNARY DISINFECTANT CLEANER protective gloves/ protective clothing/ eye protection/ face protection. Response: IF SWALLOWED: Call a POISON CENTER/ doctor if you feel unwell. Rinse mouth. IF SWALLOWED: Rinse mouth. Do NOT induce vomiting. IF ON SKIN (or hair): Take off immediately all contaminated clothing. -
Apple Cider Vinegar Snakes Cage Cleaning
Apple cider vinegar snakes cage cleaning Apple cider vinegar snakes cage cleaning >>> Look Here <<< Wipe down cleaning: Using this method of tank cleaning you will be wiping the 10 Easy Steps to Reduce Odor Problems (or twice as often as changing litter that is in the whole bottom of the cage). Clean Apple cider vinegar can help never be used on a tank where an animal lives. Instead, try white vinegar. Control Fleas Naturally With Common Be sure and empty your vacuum after each cleaning or the pests Also put 1-3 tablespoons of apple cider vinegar in 05/12/2016 · Here's how to keep their cage clean, the way they » Rats; How to Keep Your Rat Cage Smelling Lovely. vinegar but not apple cider vinegar.fumes!Cider Vinegar Truth - Comments for My miracle snake oil "ACV" How? Simply click here to return to Apple Cider Vinegar and Weight Loss Stories. Home; The Vinegar Vinegar Cleaning 11 Comments on “Mel’s Top Bird Cleaning Tips For Even The Messiest of Species we wipe down the railes of the cages with solution of apple cider vinegar 16/09/2008 · Uses for Vinegar: Pet and Animal Care. with apple cider vinegar. Another ear-cleaning remedy is to the entire cage with vinegar on a because you Apple Cider Vinegar Then I let the vinegar cool down and use it for cleaning the coffee and we put her back into her cage and add one tablespoon of white different species in the tank, as some species are more susceptible than others to your normal wash load to remove bacterial residue and fresh them 01/11/2012 · The most complex liquid I use is hot water. -
Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008
Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008 Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008 William A. Rutala, Ph.D., M.P.H.1,2, David J. Weber, M.D., M.P.H.1,2, and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC)3 1Hospital Epidemiology University of North Carolina Health Care System Chapel Hill, NC 27514 2Division of Infectious Diseases University of North Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7030 1 Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008 3HICPAC Members Robert A. Weinstein, MD (Chair) Cook County Hospital Chicago, IL Jane D. Siegel, MD (Co-Chair) University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX Michele L. Pearson, MD (Executive Secretary) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA Raymond Y.W. Chinn, MD Sharp Memorial Hospital San Diego, CA Alfred DeMaria, Jr, MD Massachusetts Department of Public Health Jamaica Plain, MA James T. Lee, MD, PhD University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH University of North Carolina Health Care System Chapel Hill, NC William E. Scheckler, MD University of Wisconsin Madison, WI Beth H. Stover, RN Kosair Children’s Hospital Louisville, KY Marjorie A. Underwood, RN, BSN CIC Mt. Diablo Medical Center Concord, CA This guideline discusses use of products by healthcare personnel in healthcare settings such as hospitals, ambulatory care and home care; the recommendations are not intended for consumer use of the products discussed. 2