Daf Ditty Shabbes 157- Siyum Masechta

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Daf Ditty Shabbes 157- Siyum Masechta Daf Ditty Shabbes 157: Siyum Masechta 1 .וּע אָאלּ ִקּי ַעְל ְבל יֵ ישׁר גֵּ .ָאחוּתָל זַ יְ ֵ יהּ ְרל ָהַבּ ַרבּ הַבר ָאנוּ ְידּ ָת ביֵ ְאבּ ָאנוֹוַּ ְמד יַּ ָא מָאְק ו ַשׁח ָל ֵ .הּי ֲ א ַ מ ר ֵ ל הּי: ֵ א מי ַ ר ר ַ מי ֵ א הּי: ֵ ל ר ַ מ ֲ א .הּי . מצְָדּלאו ְְִָדוה, אנרמָבּרִדמידה י ְְְִַָדַָּן הוִמִמיצ ְָ וֲּארֲאמ?מ לר ַ מי:ֵהּ בּקַסְִּﬠת נֲאאְמָלְﬠֵ ָ א The mishna concludes: And from their statements and their actions, we derived that one may seal a window, and measure, and tie a knot on Shabbat. The Gemara relates: Ulla happened to come to the house of the Exilarch. He saw Rabba bar Rav Huna sitting in a tub [avna] of water and measuring it. He said to Rabba bar Rav Huna: Say that the Sages said that it is permitted to measure on Shabbat only a measurement for a mitzva. However, with regard to a measurement like this one, which is not for a mitzva, did they say that it is permitted? Rabba bar Rav Huna said to him: I am merely acting unawares and am not at all interested in the measurements. Therefore, it is not prohibited. As Steinzaltz (OMB) says: Measuring on Shabbes for a Mitzvah1 I would say that the Rabbis only permitted measuring for a mitzvah. – 157b Our Daf suggests that measuring on Shabbos for the purpose of a mitzvah is permitted, and this is why measuring the water in a mikveh is permitted. Accordingly, it would also be permitted to measure the diameter of a hole in a wall to determine if it is large enough to allow tum’ah to transfer through it. Tosafos (126b) explains that the reason it is generally not allowed to measure things on Shabbos is that doing so a weekday activity (uvda d’chol), which is a rabbinic restriction. The rabbis did not apply this limitation in a case of mitzvah. Rambam (Hilchos Shabbos 24:5) explains (see below) that measuring falls into the category of “pursuing one’s own interests,” which the posuk 1 Daf Digest 2 If thou turn away thy foot because of the sabbath, from 13 גי ִאם - ָתּבשּׁמשׁ תִרבּי ﬠfְתַלָגִַ וֹשׂ, ֲֶ וֹשׂ, ﬠfְתַלָגִַ תִרבּי ָתּבשּׁמשׁ pursuing thy business on My holy day; and call the sabbath a בּfָצֲחפ וֹקְםי ֶ ;ִיְשָׁד לָאתָרְקו ַַשָּׁ ת ָבּ ת delight, and the holy of the LORD honourable; and shalt ל,ֶגנֹע שׁק הְמוְהוֹדִי ,דְֻבּכָ וַֹתִּדבְּכוָ ְ וַֹתִּדבְּכוָ ,דְֻבּכָ הְמוְהוֹדִי שׁק ל,ֶגנֹע honour it, not doing thy wonted ways, nor pursuing thy ﬠדּת ֶי,ָמfְכֲרוֵֹמשׂ צאחמּ ְֶצִפוֹ fְ ַרבְּדְו ֵ ַרבְּדְו fְ ְֶצִפוֹ צאחמּ ֶי,ָמfְכֲרוֵֹמשׂ ﬠדּת ;business, nor speaking thereof ָָדּ.רב Isa 58:13 prohibits. When measuring is done for a mitzvah, the activity becomes “the pursuit of heaven” which is not prohibited. This implies that measuring for any mitzvah would be allowed. Yet, Ritva clearly writes that measuring for a mitzvah is only permitted for the needs of Shabbos, and not for any mitzvah. Other mitzvah pursuits such as conducting an appeal for tzeddakah are permitted when they only involve thinking or speaking. Measuring, which involves an action, is only permitted when the mitzvah cannot be delayed until after Shabbos. The first tractate of the Talmud, Berakhot, concluded with a number of pithy rabbinic statements that felt both expansive and summarizing. Tractate Shabbat does something of the opposite, wrapping up by discussing a mishnah that tackles a bunch of obscure do’s and dont’s on Shabbat, including whether a man may nullify the vows of his wife or daughter, seal a window, measure a rag to see if it’s large enough to contract impurity or measure a mikveh to see if it contains enough water. To the end, it seems, the rabbis delight in the minute and obscure.2 The tractate ends with a story that springs from the discussion about measuring water for a mikveh: Ulla came to the house of the Exilarch where he saw Rabba bar Rav Huna sitting in a tub of water and measuring it. He said to Rabba bar Rav Huna: The Sages said that it is permitted to measure on Shabbat only in order to perform a mitzvah. But this measuring, which is not for a mitzvah, did they say that it is permitted? Rabba bar Rav Huna said to him: I am merely acting unawares. Ulla, was a first generation amora generally understood to be Ulla bar Yishmael. One of – לּוּע ָ א וּ of Rabbi Yoḥanan’s students, he served regularly as an emissary bringing the Torah of the land of Israel to Babylonia, also bringing the innovations of the Babylonian Sages to the land of Israel. Ulla journeyed often and would travel from place to place to teach Torah (which is why Yalta called him a “peddler”). Rav Ḥisda referred to him as, “our Rabbi who comes from the land of Israel,” and Rav Yehuda sent his son to Ulla to learn practical halakha. In the Talmud Yerushalmi, where he is normally referred to as Ulla son of Yishmael (or “Ulla the descender”) many teachings are cited in his name, and many eminent Sages of the succeeding generation were his students. 2 Myjewishlearning.org 3 We know nothing of his private life. The amora Rabba bar Ulla may have been his son. We do know that he died during a journey in Babylonia and was brought back to the land of Israel for burial. Ending the Masechta with a word about the in between spaces of Halacha, the grey areas RAMBAM, Hil Shabbes 24:1 וןהﬠפּכמאלשׁמ וֹ שׁנלמאאלאדּי רםףי בשׁ בּהבּאי ֶלדּמםָתִיִאנ ֵ ְְדָןסַוּ שׁיכָמןיִב ןֵי ה לוּם.ַר ָי ֵֶָיְאַ ְֵָיְְִִֵָָיְִִִ ִ הנאמנ וּסְפּ יר ְֵֶֶָ יר וּסְפּ הנאמנ ְַכבּדתּוֹ ְִו " ( שיע י ה נ ח י ג ) גמתבּשּׁר בlשׁל םְִֶיַַָתּ ִָאִ תוֹשֲׂ ﬠ ֲ ח ָ פ ֶ צ י םוֹיְ בּ דָ ק ְשׁ "יִ נְ ו מֱאֶ רַ " ( שיע י ה נ ח י ג ) מםאנּשׁ רֶ ֱֶַשּׁוּ ִמֶַוּר םנּ שׂדּﬠת ֶיlָמְכֲרֵמוֹ צאחמּ lְצְֶפִוֹ דּרַבְּדְו רלָ."בֵ qאִיכְפָ וּלסרָ לָםְדָא בּqַלְָּה שׁבּוָיָצֲפַחֵ ְַתבּ ִוּלֲּפַאָו ְלַדֵבּר ָבֶּהן ְכּגוֹן ְֶשׁיּ ַדֵבּר ִﬠם ֻשָׁתּפוֹ ַמה ִיּ ְמֹכּר ְלָמָחר אוֹ ַמה ִיּ ְקֶנה אוֹ ֵהיַאq ִיְבֶנה ַבִּי ת הֶ ז בוּ אְ יֵ הֶ ז רוֹחְ ס ָה לֵ י qֵ מְ ל םוֹקָ נוֹלְ פּ .יִ לָ כּ הֶ ז כְ ו צוֹיַּ אֵ וֹבּ וֹבּ אֵ צוֹיַּ כְ ו הֶ ז לָ כּ .יִ נוֹלְ פּ םוֹקָ מְ ל qֵ לֵ י ָה רוֹחְ ס הֶ ז יֵ אְ בוּ הֶ ז ת : סרשׁ ֱרֶמאֶָאנּוּ ַרדְּבּדַו ָסרדּרהבֵ וּ רבָּמררָא הוּ ְָֻרִִתּוּ הוּ רבָּמררָא וּ ָסרדּרהבֵ ַרדְּבּדַו ֱרֶמאֶָאנּוּ סרשׁ Some acts are forbidden on the Sabbath even though they neither resemble nor lead to prohibited work. Why then were they forbidden? Because it is written: "If you refrain from following your business on the Sabbath, on my holy day… If you honor it, not following your wonted ways, not pursuing your business, nor speaking of it" : If thou turn away thy foot because of the sabbath, from 13 גי ִאם - ָתּבשּׁמשׁ תִרבּי ַָגִַ ְ תﬠ,ֶלf שׂ ֲוֹ שׂ תﬠ,ֶלf pursuing thy business on My holy day; and call the sabbath a בּfָצֲחפ וֹקְםי ֶ ;ִיְשָׁד לָאתָרְקו תַבַּשָּׁ ָ תַבַּשָּׁ לָאתָרְקו ;ִיְשָׁד וֹקְםי ֶ בּfָצֲחפ delight, and the holy of the LORD honourable; and shalt ל,ֶגנֹע שׁק הְמוְהוֹדִי ,דְֻבּכָ וַֹתִּדבְּכוָ ְ וַֹתִּדבְּכוָ ,דְֻבּכָ הְמוְהוֹדִי שׁק ל,ֶגנֹע honour it, not doing thy wonted ways, nor pursuing thy ﬠדּת ֶי,ָמfְכֲרוֵֹמשׂ צאחמּ ְֶצִפוֹ fְ ַרבְּדְו ֵ ַרבְּדְו fְ ְֶצִפוֹ צאחמּ ֶי,ָמfְכֲרוֵֹמשׂ ﬠדּת ;business, nor speaking thereof ָָדּ.רב ISA 58:13 Hence, one is forbidden to go anywhere on the Sabbath in connection with his business, or even to talk about it. Thus one must not discuss with his partner what to sell on the next day, or what to buy, or how to build a certain house, or what merchandise to take to such-and-such a place. All this, and the like, is forbidden, for it is written "nor speaking of it." That is to say, speaking of business on the Sabbath is forbidden; thinking of it, however, is permitted. This same prooftext is used by RAMBAM to allow certain activities like running: RAMBAM, Hil Shabbes 24:5 רֻמתּ בּוָּץרָל ְַבּשׁ ת ַמרְבִדָל כָּהְוִצ ְ שׁןוֹג ֶ ָיּ ץוּר בְ ל ֵ תי כַּ ה ְ ֶנ ֶת ס וֹא בְ ל ֵ תי ַמּ ה ִד ְר .ָשׁ מוּ ְח ַשּׁ ְב ִ ןי ֶשׁח שׁתוֹנוְֹבּ לֶ ִצ מ ְ הָו דוֹמוּ ְד ןיִ ןיִ ְד דוֹמוּ הָ ו ְ ִצ מ לֶ שׁתוֹנוְֹבּ ֶשׁח ןי ִ ְב ַשּׁ ְח מוּ .ָשׁ ְר ִד ַמּ ה תי ֵ בְ ל וֹא ֶת ס ֶ נ ְ כַּ ה תי ֵ בְ ל ץוּר ָ יּ ֶ שׁןוֹג אוֹ ר ושׁלאשׁכִּמִמכּעוּשּׁקצ היםו הד ן געוֹל ד ְ ְֵֵֶָמהִדיְַ ִֶַיְ ִָ ֶבֶּגד ֵליַדע ִאם ְמַקֵבּל ֻטְמָאה. וּפוְֹסִקין ְצָדָקה ִָלֲﬠִניּים. ְוהוֹ יןְלכ ִ יןְלכ יכְּלתּב מטתסםְלחתּתְלֵקּנבפָ ﬠתְשׁו לֵוֹשׁייתַדרוּכּטוּאﬠ סוּ פָקר ֵרוֹיּל וּלִּליֵַַוֹאןקְלט ִ ְבּייִִֶַרְֲִַ ִַיְְְִֵֵַָ ם ְשׁ בּ בַּ .תָ ְשׁמוּ דַּ כְ ןיִ לַ ﬠ לַ ﬠ ןיִ כְ דַּ ְשׁמוּ .תָ בַּ ְשׁ בּ ם 4 לתִוֹנקיַהתּ סָרֵיאֶ לַהְתּﬠֵו וֹלנקיַ סוֹדַמְּלִ רֵפְ וֹאדַמְּלוֶּל מָוּ.נתְֻמּ ְרְַקּבוּ ִ ןי לוֹח ןיִ מוּ נְ מֲחַ םיִ בֲא לֵ .םיִ ְה ו נַּ כִ נְ סָ בְ ל קַּ רֵ ֶתא לוַֹח ה הֶ הֶ לוַֹח ה ֶתא רֵ קַּ בְ ל סָ נְ כִ נַּ ְה ו .םיִ לֵ בֲא םיִ מֲחַ נְ מוּ ןיִ לוֹח ןי וֹאמ רֵ בַּשׁ תָ איִ ה לִּ מ זִ עְ קֹ רוּ אוּפְ הָ בוֹרְ ק הָ אוֹבָ ל .וּמ ִכיְשַׁח ﬠןיִ הַל ְוּםחַתּ ֵחַקְּפל ﬠַ ﬠַל ְקִס יֵ ָהַלּכּ ו ﬠַלְﬠ ְקִס היֵ ֵתַמּ ָבְהל ִיא וֹל וֹל ִיא ָבְהל ֵתַמּ היֵ ְקִס ﬠַלְﬠ ו ָהַלּכּ יֵ ְקִס ﬠַל ﬠַ ֵחַקְּפל ְוּםחַתּ הַל ﬠןיִ ִכיְשַׁח .וּמ ָאןוֹר .ִןִייכְַרְכתו וֹלרוֹאמו ְֵ ֵללq קפּםמ ְָנוֹלְוֹ ִלי ֹאמ םָהאשׁתצ מָּאָמָבָ קֵפּם ְָנוִֹלוֹ ִלי ֹאמ בָּאתצ ההְָנָמָ ָאבֶּב ב.םַָיְאֵתמ דְִבלִוּ ַ דְִבלִוּ ב.םַָיְאֵתמ ָאבֶּב ההְָנָמָ בָּאתצ ֹאמ ִלי ְָנוִֹלוֹ קֵפּם מָּאָמָבָ םָהאשׁתצ ֹאמ ִלי ְָנוֹלְוֹ קפּםמ ֵללq חֲﬠוֹתשׂ ָצֲפ ֶ י" ְ ו וּכ ' ֲ ח ָ פ ֶצlא ֲוּסר ןי ִ" ( שיע י ה נ ח גי ) אֹלֶּשׁ זִ י ְכּ ֹר וֹל מוּםְכס .ָחכֶּשִׁקּ אָל וֵּלּ ְכ ו ֵאוֹציַּ ָהבּ מןֶ ִצ ְו הָה ןֵ נְ ו ַרֱמֶא ַרֱמֶא נְ ו ןֵ הָה ְו ִצ מןֶ ָהבּ ֵאוֹציַּ ְכ ו וֵּלּ אָל .ָחכֶּשִׁקּ מוּםְכס וֹל ֹר ְכּ זִ י אֹלֶּשׁ : ֵמיְשׁצֶחפ םמַיָ ִןיָרִֻתּ םמַיָ ֵמיְשׁצֶחפ It is permissible to run on Shabbat to a matter of a commandment—for example, if he runs to the synagogue or to the study hall.
Recommended publications
  • Daf Ditty Eruvin 104: the Sound of (Shabbes) Music
    Daf Ditty Eruvin 104: The Sound of (Shabbes) Music 1 once went to בש ת . אלוע using a wheel on שדקמה יבת We may draw water from the two wells in the בש ת commented that the person was אלוע and בש ת A man knocked on the door on. הנמש בר visit however, defended the person and said; musical , ברה .by making noise with his knocking ללחמ . בש ת sounds on אל רסא ו אלא לוק לש יש ר – only is it סא ו ר produce to We learned in the Mishna: One may draw water from the Cistern of the Exiles by means of a wheel. The Gemara relates: Ulla happened to come to the house of Rav Menashe when a certain man came and knocked at the door. Ulla said: Who is that? May his body be desecrated, as he desecrates Shabbat by producing a sound. 2 onto a metal plate for לכ י only allows causing the noise of water dripping from a רב י י את The but not for a regular person, apparently because even making non-musical הלוח the sake of a ? סא ו ר sounds that would help wake a person, is Rabba said to him: The Sages prohibited only a pleasant musical sound on Shabbat, not the rasping sound of knocking on a door. Abaye raised an objection to Rabba from a baraita: One may draw up wine from a barrel with a siphon [diyofei], and one may drip water from a vessel that releases water in drops [miarak], for an ill person on Shabbat.
    [Show full text]
  • Blind in the Torah Service
    Committee on Jewish Law and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly OH 139.2003 THE PARTICIPATION OF JEWS WHO ARE BLIND IN THE TORAH SERVICE RABBI DANIEL S. NEVINS This responsum was adopted by the CJLS on January 15, 2003, by a vote of sixteen in favor, none oppossed, and no abstentions. In favor: Rabbis Abelson, Bergman, Dorff, Drazen, Fine, Frydman-Kohl, Geller, Kurtz, Nevins, Norry, Plotkin, Prouser, Rabinowitz, Rembaum, Roth, and Spitz. vkta1 Can a person who is blind read Torah by memorizing the parshah, or by placing a scanner on top of the Torah text that would translate the text into braille? vcua,2 /sh 'yh trehu :‡v h¬¦b£t Whe«k¡tN«¥ ,t¬¥¨ r¨h§u k«·J§f¦n i­T¦¥, t¬«k rº¥U¦g h´¥b§p¦k§u Jr¥ º¥j k´¥K©e§,Ît«k« Do not curse the deaf nor shall you place a stumbling block before the blind; you shall revere your God--I am Adonai (Leviticus 19:14). Throughout Jewish history, Jews who are blind have functioned as full members of the Jewish community, and in many cases, as spiritual and educational leaders too. In contrast to many ancient societies which scorned and persecuted people with disabilities, Judaism has taught us to see the infinite worth of human life and to preserve the safety and dignity of all people. One measure of a person’s dignity is the extent to which he or she is included in the ritual expectations of his or her community. There is a substantial halakhic literature regarding the obligations of Jews who are blind to observe the mitzvot and their ability to fulfill various ritual requirements on behalf of themselves, their families and the congregation.3 In this responsum, we will review the debate 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Library of Congress Classification
    KB RELIGIOUS LAW IN GENERAL. COMPARATIVE RELIGIOUS LAW. KB JURISPRUDENCE Religious law in general. Comparative religious law. Jurisprudence Class here comparative studies on different religious legal systems, as well as intra-denominational comparisons (e.g. different Christian religious legal systems) Further, class here comparative studies on religious legal systems with other legal systems, including ancient law For comparison of a religious legal system with the law of two or more jurisdictions, see the religious system (e.g. Islamic law compared to Egyptian and Malaysian law, see KBP) Comparisons include both systematic-theoretical elaborations as well as parallel presentations of different systems For influences of a religious legal system on the law of a particuar jurisdiction, see the jurisdiction For works on law and religion see BL65.L33 Bibliography For personal bibliography or bibliography relating to a particular religious system or subject, see the appropriate KB subclass 2 Bibliography of bibliography. Bibliographical concordances 4 Indexes for periodical literature, society publications, collections, etc. Periodicals For KB8-KB68, the book number, derived from the main entry, is determined by the letters following the letter for which the class number stands, e.g. KB11.I54, Dine Yisrael 7 General Jewish 8 A - Archiu 8.3 Archiv - Archivz e.g. 8.3.R37 Archives d'histoire du droit oriental 9 Archiw - Az 9.3 B e.g. 9.3.U43 Bulletin/International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists 10 C 11 D e.g. 11.I54 Dine Yisrael: shanaton le-mishpat ʻIvri ule-mishpahah be-Yiʼsrael 12 E - Etuder 12.3 Etudes - Ez 13 F 14 G 15 H 16 I e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Halevy, Halivni and The Oral Formation of the Babylonian Talmud Ari Bergmann Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Ari Bergmann All rights reserved ABSTRACT Halevy, Halivni and The Oral Formation of the Babylonian Talmud Ari Bergmann This dissertation is dedicated to a detailed analysis and comparison of the theories on the process of the formation of the Babylonian Talmud by Yitzhak Isaac Halevy and David Weiss Halivni. These two scholars exhibited a similar mastery of the talmudic corpus and were able to combine the roles of historian and literary critic to provide a full construct of the formation of the Bavli with supporting internal evidence to support their claims. However, their historical construct and findings are diametrically opposed. Yitzhak Isaac Halevy presented a comprehensive theory of the process of the formation of the Talmud in his magnum opus Dorot Harishonim. The scope of his work was unprecedented and his construct on the formation of the Talmud encompassed the entire process of the formation of the Bavli, from the Amoraim in the 4th century to the end of the saboraic era (which he argued closed in the end of the 6th century). Halevy was the ultimate guardian of tradition and argued that the process of the formation of the Bavli took place entirely within the amoraic academy by a highly structured and coordinated process and was sealed by an international rabbinical assembly. While Halevy was primarily a historian, David Weiss Halivni is primarily a talmudist and commentator on the Talmud itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbis Behaving Badly?
    RABBIS BEHAVING BADLY? TEBH Minyan Talmud Study The Talmud is mostly devoted to detailed analysis of fine points of halakha. Inserted between ​ ​ the legal debates are stories that illustrate the legal principle or teach a lesson about how people should treat each other. The stories often make one of the rabbis a central character. They were real people, both in the sense they are not fictional characters and in the sense they had flaws and made mistakes just like us. Often the Talmud will not explicitly say whether the actions of the rabbi in question were appropriate or not. In the following examples, do you think the sage acted properly? Why or why not? This first excerpt is from the tractate dealing with blessings, and describes an incident involving Bar Kappara, a Talmudist of the late 2nd and early 3rd century CE and a student of R' Judah ​ ​ ​ haNasi (who redacted the Mishna). He was known for his satirical wit, but at some point it so ​ ​ ​ offended his teacher it lost him the chance to be ordained. ​ ​ Berakhot 39a Two students were sitting before bar Kappara when cooked cabbage, cooked Damascene plums and pullets were set before him. Bar Kappara gave one of the students permission to recite a blessing. He hurried and recited a blessing over the pullets and his counterpart ridiculed him for gluttonously reciting the blessing that should have been recited later, first. Bar Kappara became angry with both of them, he said: I am not angry with the one who recited the blessing, but at the one who ridiculed him.
    [Show full text]
  • RABBIS and COMMUNITY in THIRD CENTURY BABYLONIA JACOB NEUSNER the Babylonian Rabbis Played No Special Role in the Life of the Sy
    RABBIS AND COMMUNITY IN THIRD CENTURY BABYLONIA BY JACOB NEUSNER Brown University I The Babylonian rabbis played no special role in the life of the syna­ gogue. They exercised no sacerdotal functions. While some of them, notably Rav and Samuel, composed prayers, we have no way of knowing how widely, if at all, rabbinic liturgies were accepted in syna­ gogues during their lifetimes. Many of these, for instance blessings to be said before eating various kinds of food, and the Grace after Meals, probably were initially recited in the school house alone, even there posing some complex difficulties for the students, as we shall see. In any event, the rabbis did not normally recite the services, read from the Torah, bless the people, or assume any other sacerdotal duties which set them apart from, and above, the people in the synagogue. While they quite naturally praised synagogue prayer, they held that their studies were more important. R. I;Iisda (late 3rd century), for example, explained (Ps. 87.2), "The Lord loveth the gates of Zion [?iyyon]" to mean that the Lord loves the gates distinguished [me?uyan-im] through law [halakhah] more than synagogues and houses of study, and similarly we have the following sayings: Abaye said, "At first I used to study in my house and pray in the synagogue. Since I heard the saying of R. I:liyya b. 'Ammi in the name of 'Ulla, 'Since the day that the Temple was destroyed, the Holy One, blessed be He, has nothing in his world but the four cubits of the law alone,' I pray only in the place where I study ..
    [Show full text]
  • Jews and Judaism in the Rabbinic Era
    Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism Edited by Maren Niehoff (Jerusalem) Annette Y. Reed (Philadelphia, PA) Seth Schwartz (New York, NY) Moulie Vidas (Princeton, NJ) 173 Isaiah M. Gafni Jews and Judaism in the Rabbinic Era Image and Reality – History and Historiography Mohr Siebeck Isaiah M. Gafni, born 1944; BA, MA, and PhD from the Hebrew University; 1967–2012 taught Jewish History of the Second Temple and Talmudic Periods (500 BCE – 500 CE) at the Hebrew University; currently Professor Emeritus in Jewish History at the Hebrew University, and President of Shalem College, Jerusalem. ISBN 978-3-16-152731-9 / eISBN 978-3-16-156701-8 DOI 10.1628/978-3-16-156701-8 ISSN 0721-8753 / eISSN 2568-9525 (Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism) The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data are available at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2019 Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, Germany. www.mohrsiebeck.com This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher’s written permission. This applies particularly to reproduc- tions, translations and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed on non-aging paper by Gulde Druck in Tübingen, and bound by Groß- buchbinderei Spinner in Ottersweier. Printed in Germany. For Naomi Table of Contents Abbreviations.............................................................................................. IX I Introduction .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Talmud for Beginners בבא מציעא, אלו מציאות Rabbi Yaakov Rich
    Congregation Toras Chaim Talmud for Beginners בבא מציעא, אלו מציאות Rabbi Yaakov Rich 2009 THE TALMUD: FACTS AND FIGURES Gemara: the Aramaic name for the Talmud and its elucidations In Eretz Yisroel, the Sages of the Talmud are called Rebbe; in Babylon, Rav or Mar For 1,000 years, Babylon was the center of Jewish life and Torah study, beginning with destruction of the Beis HaMikdash and continuing until the end of the Geonic period. There are sixty-three tractates in the Mishnah, thirty-seven tractates in the Talmud Bavli, and 533 chapters in Shas. The Tanna’im, “Teachers,” Sages of the Mishnah, were active for five generations, from 3448-3980. The Amora’im, “Explainers,” Sages of the Gemara, were active for seven generations, from 3980- 4260. There are 4,000 Greek and Latin words in the Talmud. There were 276 Tanna’im. There were 1,932 Amora’im. (Some say that there were as many as 3,400 or as few as 773, depending whether every name appearing in the Talmud is an individual Amora, or various names for the same person.) The compilation of the Talmud took 300 years. There are fourteen sefarim that deal with the al tekrei in the Talmud. Eighty sefarim had been published before the Holocaust, dealing with the historical order of the Tanna’im and Amora’im. There are eighty sefarim devoted to the aggadas Raba bar Bar Chana (in Maseches Bava Basra) and Sabi DaVei Atuna (in Maseches Bechoros). 700 sefarim had appeared before the Holocaust explaining the aggados of the Talmud.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbinic Discourse on Divination in the Babylonian Talmud By
    Rabbinic Discourse on Divination in the Babylonian Talmud by Stephanie L. Bolz A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Near Eastern Studies) in The University of Michigan 2012 Doctoral Committee: Professor Gabriele Boccaccini, Co-Chair Professor Richard Kalmin, Co-Chair, The Jewish Theological Seminary Associate Professor Brian B. Schmidt Assistant Professor Rachel Neis © Stephanie L. Bolz 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In the process of writing this dissertation I have benefitted greatly from my dissertation co-chair, Richard Kalmin of the Jewish Theological Seminary. My sincere thanks go do him for all the criticism and positive feedback he provided along with way. His knowledge, brilliant insights and timely feedback have been invaluable. My thanks go to my other co-chair, Gabriele Boccacini. Since the beginning of my PhD studies he has provided a stimulating intellectual environment both in the seminars he has offered and the undergraduate courses for which I had the opportunity to be his Graduate Student Instructor. My thanks also go to my other committee members, Rachel Neis and Brian Schmidt. I am thankful for the time they gave to reading my work and the feedback they provided. All of the members of my dissertation committee have offered solid contributions and guidance for both this dissertation and my future work and for this I am deeply grateful. Many organizations at the University of Michigan have been a source of financial and administrative assistance. The Department of Near Eastern Studies has provided me with numerous teaching posts and administrative support. I would also like to thank the Frankel Center for Judaic Studies, the Horace H.
    [Show full text]
  • How Many R. Hamnunas in the Babylonian Talmud? a Study in Talmudic Chronology
    RRJ 10,1_f5_95-113IIIII 5/21/07 1:07 PM Page 95 HOW MANY R. HAMNUNAS IN THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD? A STUDY IN TALMUDIC CHRONOLOGY Barak S. Cohen Bar-Ilan University The identity, time, standing, and geographical location of the Amora R. Hamnuna have not been determined by scholarly research.1 Indeed, different, sometimes opposing, proposals have been raised in the Rabbinic and scholarly literatures regarding the question of how many Amoraim were named “Hamnuna” in Babylonia in the Talmudic period.2 A considerable percentage of these studies make assump- tions that should be reconsidered, especially in light of the progress made in research on the terminology of the Babylonian Talmud and the hierarchical relationship among Babylonian Amoraim. This explo- ration of these questions will extend to other sages in the first gen- erations of Amoraim in Babylonia. At the end of the discussion we will suggest the broader implications ensuing from our study. The first and most basic question is, How many Amoraim by the name of R. Hamnuna lived in Babylonia during the Talmudic period? 1 On R. Hamnuna’s geographical location, see M. Beer, Amorai Bavel: Perakim be- Hayei ha-Kalkalah (Ramat Gan, 1975), p. 235, n. 42. See also J. Joël, “Beiträge zur Geographie des Talmud,” in MGWJ 16 (1972), pp. 386–387. On the various proposals concerning the standing of R. Hamnuna in the academy of Sura, see esp. S.K. Mirsky, “Le-Sidrei ha-Yeshivot be-Bavel be-Tekufat ha-Amora’im,” in Horeb 3 (1937), p. 121; I. Halevy, Dorot ha-Rishonim (Berlin and Vienna, 1920), p.
    [Show full text]
  • Behar Vol.26 No.33:Layout 1
    cvr vacug s; Volume 26 BEHAR No. 33 Daf Hashavua 10 May 2014 • 10 Iyar 5774 Shabbat ends in London at 9.34pm Artscroll p.696 • Hertz p.531 • Soncino p.764 Sayings & Ulla Sayers of the Sidrah by Rabbi Samuel Landau, Kingston, Surbiton & District United Synagogue Chumash: ‘You shall not make idols for Israel, he was tortured by feelings of guilt – yourselves…and in your land you shall not perhaps he had encouraged the heinous place a flooring stone upon which to crime. His colleagues assured him that he prostrate yourself, for I am the Lord, your acted in acceptable self-defence. G-d’. (Bemidbar 26:1) Ulla was strict in his legal rulings. Once, Talmud: ‘Ulla said: “the Torah only forbids when he heard his colleague Rav Huna use prostration which involves [fully] an expression in a legal context with spreading out one’s arms and legs”’. which he disagreed, he commented: (Megillah 22b) "As vinegar to the teeth, and as smoke to the eyes, so are the Ulla was one of the leading words of Rav Huna". Ulla also Amoraim (lit. ‘sayers’, referring used this passionate form of to the generation of Rabbis expression elsewhere. For after the completion of the example, he was asked to what Mishnah c.200 CE) in the Land extent one must perform the of Israel. On his frequent visits commandment of honouring to the communities of Babylonia, one’s parents. He cited the case of he was often invited by the a non-Jew who was asked to Exilarch to deliver public lectures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Amoraic Controversy, Halakha and Authority in Bavli Eruvin 104A
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 6 Original Research The Amoraic controversy, halakha and authority in Bavli Eruvin 104a Author: The Talmud Bavli presents in Tractate Eruvin (104a) a controversy between two Amoraim, 1 Uri Zur Ulla and Rabbah. This controversy on the topic of producing a sound on the Sabbath is the Affiliation: context of the present study. According to Ulla, any production of sound on the Sabbath is 1Department of Moreshet forbidden, and according to Rabbah, producing a musical sound is prohibited on the Sabbath Israel, Faculty of Social but producing a sound that is not musical is permitted. The purpose of the study is to Sciences and Humanities, present the two approaches to solving the controversy, where the dilemma is which of them Ariel University, Ariel, Israel should the halakha follow. The setting of the study is a comparative analysis of two different Corresponding author: halakhic approaches. Accordingly, this controversy created two different fundamental Uri Zur, halakhic approaches that have implications for the authority of the Talmud Bavli compared [email protected] to the Talmud Yerushalmi, that is, which of these Talmuds has more authority than the other. Dates: The research methods of this article portray the various outlooks of the poskim and Received: 25 Apr. 2021 commentators, from amongst the first representatives to relate to this problem, where the Accepted: 17 June 2021 results show that a relative majority of the commentators follow the approach of the Rif. The Published: 12 Aug. 2021 article’s conclusion is that the authority of the Talmud Bavli is greater than that of the Talmud How to cite this article: Yerushalmi.
    [Show full text]