Summary of the Report : Onboard Employment Socio-Economic Impact of a Sustainable Fisheries Model

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Summary of the Report : Onboard Employment Socio-Economic Impact of a Sustainable Fisheries Model Summary of the report : Onboard employment Socio-economic impact of a sustainable fisheries model. greenpeace.es Index Introduction 3 Methodology 5 Sustainable fisheries model 7 Supporting low scale sustainable fisheries Phasing out of destructive fishing technique Extending the network of marine reserves Moving towards converting deep sea fishing to sustainability Limiting aquaculture operations Developing measures to inform and raise awareness in consumers Complying with biological optimums Controlling pollution in coastal areas Main Results: 13 Global impact on the economy and jobs Impact of the model by sectors of activity Reversing the job loss trend of the current fisheries model Characteristics of employment in fishing communities and the rest of the economy. Type of jobs created in the economy as a whole Conclusions Greenpeace Demands 22 Glossary 24 2 ONBOARD EMPLOYMENT. Introduction European fisheries are facing an The new Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) The reportOnboard employment: unsustainable situation in which regulation approved in May 2013 and Socio-economic impact of a sustainable previously rich, diverse fish effective from January 1st 2014, offers fisheries model proposes a series of the chance to eliminate overfishing measures to be implemented between populations have been decimated and provide an economically viable and 2014 and 2024 and analyses the effects to a fraction of their original size, environmentally sustainable option for they would have on the economy and giving rise to an ecological, social fishermen and the oceans. Between 2014 employment. This set of actions would and ultimately, economic crisis. and 2024 member states have to apply make Spanish fisheries 100% sustainable the regulation to recover fishing stocks, and would also increase economic reduce fleet capacity and fishing effort, production by 4 billion euros and create In addition to the effects of overfishing, prioritise the elimination of destructive over 60,100 jobs; as well as delivering the large ships in European fleets are fishing practices and promote access to better conserved, resource-rich seas and having an impact on marine ecosystems. resources for those engaged in sustainable coasts. After depleting resources in national fishing. waters, European Union fishing The 100% sustainable fisheries model operations have transferred to the Given the opportunity for change offered is based on the correct application of waters of other continents and currently, by the application of the CFP in Spain, all the criteria approved in the new CFP countries with a fleet like Spain have to Greenpeace wants to contribute real regulations between 2014 and 2024 import more than 60% of the fish they solutions which it has compiled in this with one or two additional measures. consume, whereas with good management analysis of the economic, social and Application of the model Greenpeace is a large proportion of that fish could environmental advantages of a 100% proposing would retain the population in come from domestic waters. However, sustainable fisheries model with low rural coastal areas; benefit collectives with the fishing policies applied to date have impactl fishermen and the health of the difficulties to access employment, such as been unable to prevent fleet overcapacity oceans at its epicentre. young people and women; and open up and have brought negative consequences new business opportunities like fishing for the economy, society and the The first part of this study1 was published tourism. environment. in 2013 and analysed the current economic and social situation in the This summary presents the actions fishing industry. The main conclusion was proposed in the study and the main the urgent need for measures to achieve a results of the technical analysis of their sustainable fisheries model, the subject of economic and social impact in the period this new study. between 2014 and 2024. GREENPEACE SPAIN 3 4 ONBOARD EMPLOYMENT. Methodology The proposed fisheries model The effect of the sustainable fisheries indicates a set of eight key model on the economy and employment lines of action to support the has been measured with Input-Output analysis. This type of analysis enables transition towards a sustainable measurement of the impacts on the fisheries model. The study economy as a whole associated to a change analyzes the impact on the in the demand for goods and services economy and employment for in a sector. Input-Output analysis is every line of action for the entire frequently used as a tool to measure the period in question (2014-2024). economic impact of some sectors on others, but the lack of previous references The global effect of the model is of its application to the fishing industry the sum of the partial impacts of in Spain is an indication of the innovative the various actions. nature of this present study. The database for the analysis was constructed with the most current data published by the Spanish National Statistics Institute (Spanish Input-Output tables for 2008) dividing the fishing industry into two subsectors (low impact fishing and non low impact fishing)2. In addition to the data on the economic impact on production and number of jobs obtained in the analysis, the model has been extended to include two major blocks: the environment, to quantify increases or reductions in CO2 emissions, and employment, to examine the type of jobs created or destroyed with the proposed actions. GREENPEACE SPAIN 5 6 ONBOARD EMPLOYMENT. Sustainable fisheries model The proposed sustainable Supporting low impact Action: fisheries model is designed 1 sustainable fisheries • Exclusive access to resources for to support low impact and Low impact fisheries are sustainable fishing within the 12 characterised by their environmental and nautical miles of the territorial sea7. sustainable fishing and the social sustainability and they represent recovery of fishery resources. 77% of the fleet4, 5. Low impact fishing • Creation of a special label for fish Below is a description of the practices, also known as small-scale caught by low impact fishing. proposed eight lines of action fishing, exclude any form of trawling. They for moving gradually from respect the marine environment because • Advice on energy efficient measures the current model towards an they are selective and have little impact on for the fleet, regulations and subsequent the marine environment, species and/or implementation. environmentally, economically the habitat where they are used. and socially sustainable fisheries • Promotion of fishing tourism through model. For the impact analysis, The socio-economical analysis of the structured support plans8. each action has an associated sector also shows that low impact fisheries investment and cost between contribute to social sustainability 6, by Phasing out destructive promoting the socio-economic structure 2 fishing techniques 2014 and 2024 which will affect of coastal communities because they A sustainable fishing model the economy and employment mainly take the form of small, often cannot include destructive non-selective in the fishing industry and the family-run companies or self-employed fishing techniques such as certain workers, where the shipowner is also the other economic sectors that will types of purse seining and trawling, 3 master of the vessel. They also promote benefit from the model . (11% of the fleet is currently dedicated employment among young people, women to trawling)9. Trawling has a major and the over 50s. environmental impact because it is non- selective, capturing all the species in its The proposed actions in the sustainable path whether they are being targeted or fisheries model are intended to reinforce not, thereby generating huge amounts the economic and environmental of discards in the form of fish and other profitability of the fisheries by recovering species that are thrown dead or dying back fish resources in coastal areas and into sea. The weight of the net and of the reducing variable costs like fuel. They also doors, that keep it open, have a major promote diversified sources of income impact as they move over the sea bed in fishing communities through greater destroying entire ecosystems that cease to development of sustainable fishing be productive for the next generations of tourism with training and leisure activities fishermen. linked to this type of tourism. GREENPEACE SPAIN 7 On a positive note, in fishing grounds Extending the network of Action: where trawling has been eliminated10, 11 it 3 marine reserves • Proposal to increase the existing has been found that the marine ecosystem Marine reserves are the sea and network with 49 new marine reserves recovers and overexploited species coastal equivalent of national parks on to cover at least 10% of Spain’s marine reappear after just a few years12, 13. This land. Aggressive extractive activities like surface area. line of action proposes the reduction and fishing are prohibited in these areas. subsequent phase out of the trawling fleet Inside the reserves, populations of fish • Support to develop and promote until it disappears in 2023. A percentage and other species are more abundant and a variety of training, research, and of the fleet (30%) could be converted larger. Individuals live longer grow larger tourism activities compatible with the to other more selective types of fishing. and their reproductive potential increases. levels of protection for the reserves. Conversion is feasible but has not been Different economic sectors like tourism included in this analysis due to a lack and leisure benefit directly by offering a Moving towards converting of basic information on the cost of the more attractive natural environment as 4 deep sea fishing to transformation. a holiday destination or for sports like sustainability scuba diving. The environmental benefit is The exhaustion of European fishing This line of action also includes the thus accompanied by an economic benefit. grounds has led large fishing boats to elimination of certain purse seining However, the surface area of marine travel further and further away seeking techniques aimed at overexploited species reserves globally is less than 1%.
Recommended publications
  • Social Sustainability: a Comparison of Case Studies in UK, USA and Australia
    17th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Gold Coast, 16-19 Jan 2011 Social Sustainability: A Comparison of Case Studies in UK, USA and Australia Michael Y MAK and Clinton J PEACOCK School of Architecture and Built Environment The University of Newcastle, Australia Abstract Traditionally, the sustainable development concept emphasizes on environmental areas such as waste and recycling, energy efficiency, water resource, building design, carbon emission, and aims to eliminate negative environmental impact while continuing to be completely ecologically sustainable through skilful and sensitive design. However, contemporarily sustainable development also implies an improvement in the quality of life through education, justice, community participation, and recreation. Recently social sustainability has gained an increased awareness as a fundamental component of sustainable development to encompass human rights, labour rights, and corporate governance. The goals of social sustainability are that future generations should have the same or greater access to social resources as the current generation. This paper aims to reveal the level of focus a development has in meeting social sustainable goals, success factors for a development, and planning a development now and into the future from a socially orientated perspective. This paper examines the characteristics of social sustainable developments through the comparison of three case studies: the Thames Gateway in east of London, UK, the Sonoma Mountain Village in north of San Francisco,
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Social Sustainability of Supply Chains Using Best Worst Method
    Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method Hadi Badri Ahmadi (Corresponding author) School of Management Science and Engineering Dalian University of Technology No. 2 Linggong Road, Ganjingzi District Dalian Liaoning Province (116023), P.R of China E-mail: [email protected] Simonov Kusi-Sarpong School of Management Science and Engineering Dalian University of Technology No. 2 Linggong Road, Ganjingzi District Dalian Liaoning Province (116023), P.R of China Eco-Engineering and Management Consult Limited 409 Abafum Avenue TI’s - Adentan, Accra-Ghana E-mail: [email protected] Jafar Rezaei Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management Delft University of Technology 2628 BX Delft, the Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] 1 Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method Abstract – A truly sustainable organization needs to take the economic, environmental and social dimensions of sustainability into account. Although the economic and environmental dimensions of sustainability have been examined by many scholars and practitioners, thus far, the social dimension has been received less attention in literature and in practice, in particular in developing countries. Social sustainability enables other sustainability initiatives and overlooking this dimension can have a serious adverse impact across supply chains. To address this issue, this study proposes a framework for investigating the social sustainability of supply chains in manufacturing companies. To show the applicability and efficiency of the proposed framework, a sample of 38 experts was used to evaluate and prioritize social sustainability criteria, using a multi-criteria decision-making method called the ‘best worst method’ (BWM). The criteria are ranked according to their average weight obtained through BWM.
    [Show full text]
  • (ESG) Update Supporting Sustainable Growth April 2018 2 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Update HSBC Holdings Plc
    HSBC Holdings plc Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Update Supporting sustainable growth April 2018 2 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Update HSBC Holdings plc Hong Kong Stock Code: 5 HSBC Holdings plc Incorporated in England on 1 January 1959 with limited liability under the UK Companies Act Registered in England: number 617987 Our cover image The Singapore Supertrees are a cluster of large tree-like structures constructed in the heart of Singapore. Many of the Supertrees are embedded with environmentally sustainable functions – including generating solar energy, collecting rainwater, and acting as vertical gardens with more than 150,000 plants. These innovative structures create a green respite in the centre of the urban centre. Our photo competition winners The cover of this report showcases one of the images taken by one of our employees. The image was selected from more than 2,100 submissions to a Group-wide photography competition. Launched in June 2017, HSBC NOW Photo is an ongoing project that encourages our people to capture and share the diverse world around them with a camera. Contents 3 Contents 1 Group Chief Executive’s statement 5 2 Customers 8 3 Employees 21 4 Supporting sustainable growth 28 5 Governance 37 6 Links and information 41 4 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Update HSBC Holdings plc About The information set out in this document, taken together with the information relating to ESG issues detailed in our HSBC Holdings plc Annual Report and Accounts 2017 and the information available in the links below, aims to provide you with key ESG information and data relevant to our operations for the year ended 31 December 2017 and in order to comply with the Environmental, Social and Governance Reporting Guide contained in Appendix 27 to The Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (‘ESG Guide’).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Role of Carbon Dioxide Removal in Companies' Climate
    Net Expectations Assessing the role of carbon dioxide removal in companies’ climate plans. Briefing by Greenpeace UK January 2021 ~ While a few companies plan to deliver CDR Executive in specific projects, many plan to simply purchase credits on carbon markets, summary which have been beset with integrity problems and dubious accounting, even where certified. To stabilise global temperatures at any level – whether 1.5˚C, 2˚C, 3˚C or 5˚C Limits and uncertainties – carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions must The IPCC warns that reliance on CDR is a major reach net zero at some point, because risk to humanity’s ability to achieve the Paris goals. of CO2’s long-term, cumulative effect. The uncertainties are not whether mechanisms to remove CO2 “work”: they all work in a laboratory According to the Intergovernmental at least. Rather, it is whether they can be delivered Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), at scale, with sufficient funding and regulation, to store CO2 over the long term without unacceptable limiting warming to 1.5˚C requires net- social and environmental impacts. zero CO2 to be reached by about 2050. To illustrate the need for regulation, the carbon A small proportion of emissions is likely to be dioxide captured by forests is highly dependent on unavoidable and must be offset by carbon dioxide their specific circumstances, including their removal (CDR), such as by tree-planting (afforestation/ species diversity, the prior land use, and future reforestation) or by technological approaches like risks to the forest (such as fires or pests). In some bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) cases, forests and BECCS can increase rather than or direct air carbon capture with storage (DACCS).
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental, Cultural, Economic, and Social Sustainability
    Eleventh International Conference on Environmental, Cultural, Economic, and Social Sustainability 21–23 JANUARY 2015 | SCANDIC HOTEL COPENHAGEN COPENHAGEN, DENMARK | ONSUSTAINABILITY.COM Sustainability Conference 1 Dear Delegate, The Sustainability knowledge community is an international conference, a cross-disciplinary scholarly journal, a book imprint, and an online knowledge community which, together, set out to describe, analyze and interpret the role of Sustainability. These media are intended to provide spaces for careful, scholarly reflection and open dialogue. The bases of this endeavour are cross- disciplinary. The community is brought together by a common concern for sustainability in an holistic perspective, where environmental, cultural, economic and, social concerns intersect. In addition to organizing the Sustainability Conference, Common Ground publishes papers from the conference at http://onsustainability.com/publications/journal. We do encourage all conference participants to submit an article based on their conference presentation for peer review and possible publication in the journal. We also publish books at http://onsustainability.com/publications/books, in both print and electronic formats. We would like to invite conference participants to develop publishing proposals for original works or for edited collections of papers drawn from the journal which address an identified theme. Finally, please join our online conversation by subscribing to our monthly email newsletter, and subscribe to our Facebook, RSS, or Twitter feeds at http://onsustainability.com. Common Ground also organizes conferences and publishes journals in other areas of critical intellectual human concern, including diversity, museums, technology, humanities and the arts, to name several (see http://commongroundpublishing.com). Our aim is to create new forms of knowledge community, where people meet in person and also remain connected virtually, making the most of the potentials for access using digital media.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of Effective Communication Strategies to Encourage People to Eat Less Meat in Order to Address Climate Change
    MASTER THESIS By Lena Johanning M.Sc. Nachhaltigkeitsgeographie University of Greifswald 6. Semester (WiSe 2015/16) Matrikelnr.: 128180 Contact: [email protected] Promoter: Prof. Dr. Susanne Stoll- Kleemann P.D. Annick Hedlund-de Witt Due date: 06. Oct. 2015 EXPLORATION OF EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES TO ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO EAT LESS MEAT IN ORDER TO ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE “As the world begins seriously to take stock of the true cost of our food consumption—especially meat—the need to find powerful forces within ourselves and our cultures to help us change becomes more urgent” (Palmer, 2010). I Preface This Master thesis project builds on and carries forward a case study that was embedded in an internship in the research group Biotechnology and the Society (BTS) at TU Delft in the Netherlands, between October 2014 and March 2015. The case study “Meat consumption and climate change-an inconvenient couple? - How to communicate the high efficacy to eat less meat to combat climate change to the public in order that it raises interest?” explores and gives a proposal of a communication strategy that closes the knowledge gap of the high efficacy to eat less meat as a climate change mitigation option, in a way that it raises interest and encourages positive change. Further, this strategy was tested by a qualitative evaluation of students, to investigate if it achieves its objectives (Johanning L., 2015). Abstract This Master thesis project explores effective communication strategies to encourage people to eat less meat, in order to address climate change. Thereby, the study carries out two methodologies of designing an exemplary campaign, based on a literature review and conducting qualitative expert interviews to explore effective communication strategies, by discussing the proposed exemplary campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • HRM's Role in Corporate Social and Environmental Sustainability
    EPG SHRM Foundation’s Effective Practice Guidelines Series HRM’s Role in Corporate Social and Environmental Sustainability Produced in partnership with the World Federation of People Management Associations (WFPMA) and the North American Human Resource Management Association (NAHRMA) HRM’s Role in Corporate Social and Environmental Sustainability This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information regarding the subject matter covered. Neither the publisher nor the author is engaged in rendering legal or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent, licensed professional should be sought. Any federal and state laws discussed in this book are subject to frequent revision and interpretation by amendments or judicial revisions that may significantly affect employer or employee rights and obligations. Readers are encouraged to seek legal counsel regarding specific policies and practices in their organizations. This book is published by the SHRM Foundation, an affiliate of the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM®). The interpretations, conclusions and recommendations in this book are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the SHRM Foundation. ©2012 SHRM Foundation. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. This publication may not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in whole or in part, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the SHRM Foundation, 1800 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314. Selection of report topics, treatment of issues, interpretation and other editorial decisions for the Effective Practice Guidelines series are handled by SHRM Foundation staff and the report authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecovillages and Permaculture: a Reference Model for Sustainable Consumption?
    Ecovillages and Permaculture: a Reference Model for Sustainable Consumption? Autoria: Paulo Ricardo Zilio Abdala, Gabriel de Macedo Pereyron Mocellin Abstract Ecovillages are intentional ecological communities based on the harmless integration of human activities into the environment (Van Schyndel Kasper, 2008). The inspiration for this lifestyle comes from a concept called Permaculture, a term coined in 1978 by Bill Mollison, an Australian ecologist, and one of his students, David Holmgren, as a contraction of "permanent agriculture" or "permanent culture” (Mollison & Holmgren, 1978). In this research, we approach the theme of permaculture and ecovillages, focusing on ecovillagers ideas regarding sustainable consumption. Our intention is to present how people immersed in sustainable communities lifestyle deal with consumption issues by using different strategies and behaviors that are less harmful for the environment and the future generations. To accomplish this research, the sample was constituted of two ecovillages located in the south of Brazil. Both places were visited for a weekend each, during which we participated in the communities activities. Hence, the research has a qualitative methodology, best described as a short participant observation. Data collection includes field notes of the researchers, institutions website contents, as well as 4 hours of filmed interviews with a total of 7 subjects. The complexity of the phenomenon presents itself in the richness of the raw data collected. We consider this article a kind of working paper in broad terms, in the sense that new studies with more triangulation and further data collection are needed to extend the comprehension of the topic and to answer the additional questions this study brought.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Sustainability 2018]
    Social and Sustainability Science in ASEAN International Conference 2018 Agri-Food Systems, Rural Sustainability and Socioeconomic Transformations in South-east Asia 23-25 January 2018 Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, THAILAND #SocialSustainability #Chula100 #GreenAg Editor Sue Vize Editorial Staffs Andrew Noble Wayne Nelles Cholnapa Anukul Sayamol Charoenratana Sarinya Kitticharoenkan Cover Photo Siriporn Charoenratana Cover Design Waratrat LimJakkapob Copyright © 2018 Social and Sustainability Science in ASEAN International Conference 2018 Table of Contents Introduction Welcome Messages Surichai Wun’gaeo Chulalongkorn University 6 Sue Vize, UNESCO Bangkok 7 Program Committee 8 Introduction 9 Program Structure Schedule Day By Day 12 Sessions Details Keynotes 14 Plenary Policy Dialogue Sessions 15 Parallel Sessions 20 Post-Conference 31 Abstracts 33 General Information Registration 57 Venue 57 Local Information 60 Maps and Transportation 62 23-25 January 2018 [SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY 2018] Welcome address Surichai Wun’gaeo, Chulalongkorn University The first 18 years of the 21st century has been exceptionally remarkable as we, as humanity, have been faced with increasingly difficult and complex challenges. The solutions and alternatives are ways ahead, but collaboration and most importantly, shared values and vision are needed. The most significant shared value now is concerns on “sustainability”. As the oldest higher education institute in Thailand, Chulalongkorn University has brought the agenda of sustainability into our research,
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Consumption and Consumer Wellbeing
    International Centre for Anti-consumption Research (ICAR) ANTI-CONSUMPTION AND CONSUMER WELLBEING July 4-5, 2014 Kiel, Germany ICAR Proceedings Organisers: Michael SW Lee, Stefan Hoffmann Published by Kiel University Christian-Albrechts-Platz 4, 24118 Kiel, Germany ISBN: 978-0-473-28933-1 Table of Contents Anti-Consumption in the Sailing City ....................................................................................................... 2 The History of Boycott Movements in Germany: Restrictions and Promotion of Consumer Well-being............................................................................. 4 The Multi-Facets of Sustainable Consumption, Anti-Consumption, Emotional Attachment and Consumer Well-Being: The Case of the Egyptian Food Industry ........................................................... 10 Applying Rhetorical Analysis to Investigating Counter-Ideological Resistance to Environmentalism .. 15 The Curious Case of Innovators Who Simultaneously Resist Giving Up Paper Bills .............................. 21 Navigating Between Folk Models of Consumer Well-Being: The Nutella Palm Oil Case ..................... 26 The Informational and Psychological Challenges of Converting to a Frugal Life .................................. 31 Motivations, Values, and Feelings behind Resistance to Consumption and Veganism ........................ 37 Shelving a Dominating Myth: A Study on Social Nudism and Material Absence ................................. 42 Education for Sustainable (Non-) Consumption through Mindfulness Training?
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Transitions in Local Communities 1
    Working Paper Sustainability and Innovation No. S 11/2018 Köhler, J.; Hohmann, C.; Dütschke, E. Sustainability transitions in local commu- nities: district heating, water systems and communal housing projects Werkstattbericht Nr. 9 in the TRANSNIK project With the support of Ulrike Hacke, Norman Laws, Kornelia Müller, Jutta Niederste-Hollenberg, Ina Renz, Elna Schirrmeister, Julius Wesche and Rubina Zern Acknowledgements This work was funded by the BMBF (German Federal Ministry of Education and Research) through the TRANSNIK project (funding reference 01UT1417A-C). Abstract Sustainability transitions take place across geographical and political levels. Ser- vices such as energy supply, water supply and wastewater management or hous- ing are part of daily life have to be provided at the district level within larger urban governance structures or by smaller rural administrations. However, relatively lit- tle attention has been given to the analysis of these local structures. This paper reviews case studies of niches in the areas of district heat networks, communal housing projects for the elderly and sustainable water/wastewater management. The paper addresses the following research questions: 1. What are the similarities and differences in the case study's drivers and barriers that have arisen between the fields of action and what conclusions can be drawn from these insights in order to maximize success factors or to minimize obstacles in advance? 2. What are the key factors for transition, also with regard to the synergies of the three fields of action? 3. What is the stage of development of the niches? Are they in a transition process or not? District heat networks are established as a niche, but given the current policy and financial environment are developing very slowly.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Revised Standards of the Finnish Forest Certification System 2
    CERTIFYING EXTINCTION ? AN ASSESSMENT OF THE REVISED STANDARDS OF THE FINNISH FOREST CERTIFICATION SYSTEM 2 CopyrightCopyright © GrGreenpeaceeenpeace SeptSeptemberember 20020044 ISBN: 1 903 90709 8 WWrittenritten by Sini HarHarkkikki PhoPhotographictographic crcreditsedits FFrontront ccoverover ©W©Weiner/Greenpeaceeiner/Greenpeace This page ©Liimat©Liimatainen/ainen/Greenpeace PPageage ii ©Liimatainen/Greenpeace PPageage 1 ©W©Weckenmann/Greenpeaceeckenmann/Greenpeace PagePage 2 ©Leinonen/Greenpeace©Leinonen/Greenpeace PagePage 4–5 ©Harkki/Greenpeace©Harkki/Greenpeace PagePage 7 ©Snellman/Greenpeace PagePage 8 ©Leinonen/Greenpeace©Leinonen/Greenpeace PagePage 10 ©Leinonen/Greenpeace©Leinonen/Greenpeace PagePage 13 ©Tuomela/Greenpeace PagePage 1155 ©Hölttä/Greenpeace PagePage 16 ©Leinonen/Greenpeace PagePage 1717 ©Liimatainen/Greenpeace PagePage 18 ©Leinonen/Greenpeace©Leinonen/Greenpeace PagePage 1919 ©Weckenmann/Greenpeace PagePage 20 ©Leinonen/Greenpeace©Leinonen/Greenpeace This used to be an important reindeer PagePage 2121 ©L©Leinonen/Greenpeaceeinonen/Greenpeace grazing forest. Areas of old-growth forest, Inside back ©Leinonen/Greenpeace©Leinonen/Greenpeace like this one in Inari (Sámi region), have been Back covercover ©L©Leinonen/Greenpeaceeinonen/Greenpeace logged by the Finnish Government’s logging arm, Metsähallitus, under the Finnish Forest Designed by PPaulaul HamiltonHamilton and PPetereter MMauderauder @ oneoneanotheranother Certification System. CERTIFYING EXTINCTION? AN ASSESSMENT OF THE REVISED STANDARDS OF THE FINNISH FOREST CERTIFICATION SYSTEM i FOREWORD Finland’s forests are among the most intensively managed in the world. Over 50 million cubic metres of wood are harvested every year from the country’s 20 million hectares of commercial forests. The Finnish forest management model has resulted in the rapid conversion of natural forests into monotonous industrial forests that lack many key features of boreal forest ecosystems. Forestry is the most serious threat to species survival in Finland.
    [Show full text]