DOCSLIB.ORG

Program Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Program Manual Susquehanna Greenway River Towns Program Training Manual Prepared by: Susquehanna Greenway Partnership 201 Furnace Road Lewisburg, PA 17837 (570) 522‐7339 www.susquehannagreenway.org September 2013 Susquehanna Greenway River Towns Program Training Manual Credits and Acknowledgements Funding Partners PA Department of Conservation and Natural Resources PA Department of Economic and Community Development Chesapeake Bay Commission Susquehanna Greenway Team Trish Carothers, Executive Director Alice Trowbridge, RLA, Greenway Coordinator Zachary Pyle, River Towns Program Coordinator Bridget Kane, Membership and Volunteer Coordinator Erin Pierce, Program Coordinator Barbara Bogle, Program Assistant Susquehanna Greenway Regional Contacts Dale Freudenberger Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Area David Buck Endless Mountains Heritage Region Janie French Headwaters Charitable Trust Phil Swank Endless Mountains Heritage Region River Towns Program Advisory Committee Mike Eschenmann DCNR, Conservation Landscape Initiative (CLI) Coordinator Wes Fahringer Recreation and Parks Adviser, Region 4 Julie Fitzpatrick PA Downtown Center Monica Hoffman DCNR, Recreation and Parks Adviser Terry Hough DCNR, Environmental Planner Diane Kripas DCNR, Partnerships Division Chief Mike Piaskowski DCNR, River, Heritage Areas and Partnerships Lorne Possinger DCNR, Recreation & Parks Advisor, Region 2 Phil Swank Endless Mountains Heritage Region Jerry Walls SGP Board of Directors Kim Wheeler Lycoming County Planning Office Lori Yeich DCNR, Natural Resource Program Supervisor, Region 3 Partner Organizations Pennsylvania Downtown Center Trail Town Program of the Great Allegheny Passage Susquehanna Greenway River Towns Program Training Manual Table of Contents Tab 1: Introduction…………………………………………………………………………. 3 a. River Towns Program Overview and Process i. Program Context ii. SG River Towns Concept iii. Becoming a River Town iv. Community Benefits v. Selection Criteria vi. Selection Process b. River Town Application c. Community Leader Identification Form d. Planning Documents Inventory e. River Town Assessment Tool and Questionnaire Tab 2: Getting Organized……………………………………………………………......... 18 a. Engaging Local Organizations b. Engaging Local Volunteers c. Get Your Message Out d. Build Partnerships e. Identify Funding Sources f. River Town Team Job Description Tab 3: Community Visioning……………………………………………………………… 25 a. Visioning Overview b. Example Vision Statements i. Lewisburg 2020 ii. Lock Haven c. Visioning Exercises d. Additional Visioning Resources e. Small Group Facilitator’s Guide Tab 4: Project Planning………………………………………………………………......... 38 a. Creating a Five Year Plan b. SGP Scopes of Work i. Becoming a River Town ii. Green Infrastructure Strategy iii. Public Riverfront Access c. Green Infrastructure Fact Sheet d. Jersey Shore “More Green More Vital” Green Infrastructure Booklet Tab 5: Work Plans………………………………………………………………………….. 71 a. Steps to Create a Work Plan b. Example Work Plan c. Work Plan Template Tab 6: Project Implementation………………………………………………………….. 77 a. Fundraising Overview and Funding Programs b. Project Implementation Strategy c. Guide to Proposal Planning and Grant Writing d. North Branch Canal Trail Project Profile e. Jersey Shore Public River Access Project Profile f. Jersey Shore Conceptual Renderings Tab 7: Celebrating Success…………………………………………………….………… 111 a. How to Celebrate Success Locally b. Recognizing Volunteers c. Regional Recognition Programs Tab 8: Appendix……………………………………………………………………………. 113 a. Detailed Steps to Become a Susquehanna Greenway River Town b. River Town Resolution c. Sample River Town Bylaws d. Example Information Sharing Meeting Agenda e. Green Infrastructure Meeting Agenda – Meeting 1 f. Green Infrastructure Meeting Agenda – Meeting 2 g. Green Infrastructure Meeting Agenda – Meeting 3 h. Green Infrastructure Meeting Agenda – Meeting 4 i. Green Infrastructure Meeting Agenda – Meeting 5 j. Green Infrastructure Meeting Agenda – Meeting 6 k. Green Infrastructure Open House Agenda l. Meeting Sign In Sheet m. Media Contact Form n. Peer-to-Peer Technical Assistance Manual Susquehanna Greenway Strategic Initiatives Pennsylvania’s Largest Greenway The Susquehanna Greenway is an evolving corridor of interconnected parks, trails, river access points, conserved areas and river communities, linking people to the natural and cultural treasures of the Susquehanna River and its West Branch. It is nearly 500 miles in length, making it our state’s largest greenway. Our Vision The Susquehanna Greenway is a place and a journey connecting people and communities to the Susquehanna River and its enduring story. The Greenway unveils the spirit of the river – renewing awareness of its distinctive scenery and its natural and cultural heritage. It is a destination shaped by diverse people and the pursuit of their dreams. The Susquehanna Greenway balances the needs of generations today and tomorrow; conserves the environment for all living things; and creates healthy and successful communities, wide- ranging recreation, and economic prosperity. The Greenway celebrates the Susquehanna River as a place of timeless value, shared memories and experiences – a place to use and enjoy and to treasure always. Our Mission The Susquehanna Greenway Partnership is a leading champion for the Susquehanna River Watershed, Pennsylvania’s most important natural asset and the largest tributary to the Chesapeake Bay. We advance public and private efforts to connect people with our natural and cultural resources, and promote a sustainable and healthy environment. The Susquehanna Greenway SGP is focused on five strategic program initiatives to attain these benefits and make our vision Partnership (SGP), is a 501 (c)(3) a reality: Conserving and Enhancing Natural Resources; Improving Connectivity; Improving River nonprofit organization dedicated Access; Revitalizing River Towns; Signage, Branding and Promotion. to developing and sustaining the Susquehanna Greenway. 1. Conserving and Enhancing Natural Resources: The Susquehanna River is Pennsylvania’s longest river. It is a major resource for our region, providing drinking water for six million people and nearly half of the fresh water entering the Chesapeake Bay. Conserving critical wetlands, forestlands, farmlands and riparian areas along the river will enhance our water resources and the quality of life for all living things. SGP provides technical assistance while working collaboratively with conservation organizations, state and federal agencies, municipalities and local partners to: y Increase awareness of conservation and water quality issues y Preserve and enhance riparian corridors along the river and its tributaries y Advocate for priority conservation projects including the conservation of wetlands, forestlands, and farmlands 2. Revitalizing River Towns: Many of our river towns were built during the industrial era, but are now suffering from the loss of industry and 1 jobs, urban abandonment, suburban sprawl and shrinking tax bases. By investing in river town parks, trails and greening our downtowns, we create more desirable communities and get more feet back on the streets. These healthier, greener communities attract business investment, encourage urban living, and improve the economic potential of tourism. SGP provides technical assistance while working collaboratively with downtown revitalization programs, tourism agencies, municipalities, state and federal agencies and local partners to: y Create trails and walkways from downtowns to the river y Provide opportunities for safe walking and biking that foster healthy activities for people of all generations y Create and enhance riverfront parks, trails and access points y Promote River Towns as part of the Susquehanna Greenway y Reclaim and find new uses for abandoned buildings and brownfields 3. Improving Connectivity: By connecting communities and linking residents and visitors to the resources of the Susquehanna River with trails and greenways, we create a positive association with the river. This helps to build a greater sense of community and foster environmental stewardship. The Susquehanna Greenway SGP ‘s goal is to create over 500 miles of interconnected trails and greenways that: Partnership is a leading champion y Link riverfront parks to downtown businesses and residential areas, with trail systems, which for the Susquehanna River also provide opportunities for alternative transportation Watershed. We advocate for y Link to other regional trail systems public and private efforts to connect people with our natural y Link wildlife habitat corridors along the river and its tributaries. and cultural resources, and 4. Improving River Access: River access sites are the transition points to and from land- and water- promote a sustainable and healthy based assets and are the key to unlocking the Greenway’s potential. SGP provides technical assistance environment. while working collaboratively with municipalities, state and federal agencies and local partners to: y Add and improve river access to enhance user enjoyment and increase recreation opportunities including fishing, boating, canoeing and kayaking y Provide public access to the river from river towns 5. Signage, Branding and Promotion: The Susquehanna Greenway is in fact a greenway composed of many smaller greenways, parks, trails and conservation areas that are both existing and planned. When these existing greenway elements are connected and expanded with new greenway elements, and promoted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G
    A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF RHODODENDRON L. SECTION PENTANTHERA G. DON (ERICACEAE) BY KATHLEEN ANNE KRON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1987 , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the supervision and encouragement given to me by Dr. Walter S. Judd. I thoroughly enjoyed my work under his direction. I would also like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Bijan Dehgan, Dr. Dana G. Griffin, III, Dr. James W. Kimbrough, Dr. Jonathon Reiskind, Dr. William Louis Stern, and Dr. Norris H. Williams for their critical comments and suggestions. The National Science Foundation generously supported this project in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant;* field work in 1985 was supported by a grant from the Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, North Carolina. I thank the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of their material: A, AUA, BHA, DUKE, E, FSU, GA, GH, ISTE, JEPS , KW, KY, LAF, LE NCSC, NCU, NLU NO, OSC, PE, PH, LSU , M, MAK, MOAR, NA, , RSA/POM, SMU, SZ, TENN, TEX, TI, UARK, UC, UNA, USF, VDB, VPI, W, WA, WVA. My appreciation also is offered to the illustrators, Gerald Masters, Elizabeth Hall, Rosa Lee, Lisa Modola, and Virginia Tomat. I thank Dr. R. Howard * BSR-8601236 ii Berg for the scanning electron micrographs. Mr. Bart Schutzman graciously made available his computer program to plot the results of the principal components analyses. The herbarium staff, especially Mr. Kent D. Perkins, was always helpful and their service is greatly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • A STUDY of the TYRONE - MOUNT Udion LINEAMENT by REMOTE SENSING TECHNIWES and Fleld NIETHQDS
    A STUDY OF THE TYRONE - MOUNT UdION LINEAMENT BY REMOTE SENSING TECHNIWES AND FlELD NIETHQDS Con- NAS 5-22822 0. P. Gold, Principal Indga@x ORSER Technical Report 12-77 Office for Ramow Sensing of Earth Resources 219 Electrical Engineering West University Park, PA 16802 Prepared for GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER Greenbelt, MD 20771 The field invesrigations and much of the analvsis descrihrd in this report were used as the basis for a payer in Crology. submtttrd by Elicharl R. Cnnich to tbe Departmc~~tof ~:t~oscic-~\c~?i, in partial iu!ffllment of the rrqufrrurznts tor tlrc Mastt-r- oi Science Dcgrre. b I r T-nd- r RoonOlk I A S~~M)YOF ms ~RONR- ~\nurWIW LIN~BY December 1977 RBWTS SMSSIUC TECHNIQUS AND FlliLD t4STHWS 6 hnwym-- - r Technical Report 12-?7 J 7. habftd a -@-mQImwwn-amL David P. Gold, Principal Inwe8tigator m , 10. WRk uau Wa e m)a~~mt-#y#mdMem Office for Remote Senaing of Earth Resources 219 Electrical Bngineerin8 West Building rt. bn~nar ~nn\ &. \ The Pennsylvania State Uniwrsi ty NA!! 5-22822 University Park, PA 16802 13 ~*oro@~.om.ndhd~CI tr sponss~lr-v-nd~ddnr Final Report 11 1176-6/30/77 Caddard Space Flight Center I Crecnbelt, ND 20771 4 m.LI Field work was combined with satellite imagery and photography to study the Tyrone - Pkrunt Union lineament in Blair and Huntingdon Counties, central Pennsylvania. This feature, expressed as the valleys containing the Little Juniata and Juniata River: . transgtesscs the nose of the southwest-plunging Nittany Anticlinorium in the western extremity of the Valley ;~ndRidge Province.
    [Show full text]
  • View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX
    GIJIDEBOOJ< TECTONICS AND. CAMBRIAN·ORDO'IICIAN STRATIGRAPHY CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Pifftbutgh Geological Society with the Appalachian Geological Society Septembet, 1963 TECTONICS AND CAMBRIAN -ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY in the CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA FIELD CONFERENCE SPONSORS Pittsburgh Geological Society Appalachian Geological Society September 19, 20, 21, 1963 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 2 Cambro-Ordovician Stratigraphy of Central and South-Central 3 Pennsylvania by W. R. Wagner Fold Patterns and Continuous Deformation Mechanisms of the 13 Central Pennsylvania Folded Appalachians by R. P. Nickelsen Road Log 1st day: Bedford to State College 31 2nd day: State College to Hagerstown 65 3rd day: Hagerstown to Bedford 11.5 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Wagner paper: Figure 1. Stratigraphic cross-section of Upper-Cambrian 4 in central and south-central Pennsylvania Figure 2. Stratigraphic section of St.Paul-Beekmantown 6 rocks in central Pennsylvania and nearby Maryland Nickelsen paper: Figure 1. Geologic map of Pennsylvania 15 Figure 2. Structural lithic units and Size-Orders of folds 18 in central Pennsylvania Figure 3. Camera lucida sketches of cleavage and folds 23 Figure 4. Schematic drawing of rotational movements in 27 flexure folds Road Log: Figure 1. Route of Field Trip 30 Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for route of Field Trip 34 Figure 3. Cross-section of Martin, Miller and Rankey wells- 41 Stops I and II Figure 4. Map and cross-sections in sinking Valley area- 55 Stop III Figure 5. Panorama view of Valley and Ridge structures from ?:r Stop IX Figure 6. Camera lucida sketch of sedimentary features in ?6 contorted shale - Stop X Figure 7- Cleavage and bedding relationship at Stop XI ?9 Figure 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Alkaline Addition Problems at the Skytop/Interstate-99 Site, Central Pennsylvania1
    ALKALINE ADDITION PROBLEMS AT THE SKYTOP/INTERSTATE-99 SITE, CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA1 Arthur W. Rose and Hubert L. Barnes2 Abstract. In 2002-3, approximately 8x105 m3 of pyrite-bearing Bald Eagle sandstone and Reedsville shale were removed from a large road cut through Bald Eagle Ridge near State College, PA. The rock contained an average of about 4.5% pyrite as veins and fine veinlet networks across 200 m of road cut. Smaller amounts of ZnS and other heavy metal sulfides accompany the pyrite. The rock was placed in 9 nearby locations, including large waste piles and several valley fills, two ‘buttresses” and a lane elevation along about 0.8 km of hillside that was threatening to slide into the road. During excavation of the cut, pyrite was recognized as a potential problem and considerable lime was added as layers to the various piles. Despite the lime addition, highly acidic seeps emerged from the piles and fills, with pH 2.0 to 2.7, Fe 90-1500 mg/L, and acidities as high as 18,000 mg/L (as CaCO3). These results clearly show that addition of lime and other alkaline materials as layers is not effective. In experiments to test remediation methods, Bauxsol slurry was sprayed onto part of the buttress area but failed to prevent continuing acid seepages. Inspection trenches showed little penetration of the Bauxsol, and demonstrated the presence of the added lime as impermeable lime layers within the buttress. Bucket tests of mixtures of alkaline circulating fluidized-bed ash with pyritic rocks, when well mixed, gave alkaline effluents.
    [Show full text]
  • This Project Was Financed in Part by a Grant from the Coldwater Heritage Partnership on Behalf of the PA Department of Conservat
    This project was financed in part by a grant from the Coldwater Heritage Partnership on behalf of the PA Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, the PA Fish and Boat Commission, the Western PA Watershed Program and the PA Council of Trout UnlimiUnlimitedtedtedted.... Coldwater Heritage Partners: The Clinton County Conservation District would like to thank: Lock Haven University Dr. Md. Khalequzzaman Dr. John Way John Woodward Lycoming College Clean Water Institute Lloyd Wilson Chapter of Trout UnliUnlimitedmited Allegheny Mountain Chapter of Trout Unlimited PA State Council of Trout Unlimited Clinton County Conservation District 2008 Summer Interns PA Fish & Boat Commission USDA ––– Natural Resource Conservation Service Lamar National Fish Hatchery and NortheaNortheastst Fishery Center Special thanks to Josh Furl who was one of the Conservation District’s 2007 and 2008 Interns. Josh played a major role in field work, data collection, and preparing this Conservation Plan. TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary . 6 Fishing Creek/Cedar Run Watershed Characteristics. 6 Watershed Overview . 6 Fishing Creek Watershed’s Ecoregional Framework . 8 Physiography, Topography, and Geology. 9 Hydrology. 11 Trout . 11 Land Use . .12 Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Ch. 93 Designations . .16 Previous Studies/Analysis of Watershed. .18 Methods and Materials. 20 Water Chemistry . .20 Chemical Parameter Explanations . 22 Habitat Assessments . .24 Macroinvertebrates . .24 Electrofishing . .26 Fishing Creek Assessment . 28 Water Chemistry . .28 Habitat Assessments . .38 Macroinvertebrates . .40 Electrofishing . .45 Cedar Run Assessment . .47 Water Chemistry . 47 Habitat Assessments . 51 Macroinvertebrates . .54 Electrofishing . .58 Recommendations . 60 Agricultural Conservation Plans . 61 Riparian Vegetation/Canopy Cover . .61 No-Till/Conservation Tillage . .62 Fish Habitat Improvement/Bank Stabilization Structures .
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon Quadrangles
    DESCRIPTION OF THE HOLLIDAYSBURG AND HUNTINGDON QUADRANGLES By Charles Butts INTRODUCTION 1 BLUE RIDGE PROVINCE topography are therefore prominent ridges separated by deep SITUATION The Blue Ridge province, narrow at its north end in valleys, all trending northeastward. The Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon quadrangles are adjoin­ Virginia and Pennsylvania, is over 60 miles wide in North RELIEF ing areas in the south-central part of Pennsylvania, in Blair, Carolina. It is a rugged region of hills and ridges and deep, The lowest point in the quadrangles is at Huntingdon, Bedford, and Huntingdon Counties. (See fig. 1.) Taken as narrow valleys. The altitude of the higher summits in Vir­ where the altitude of the river bed is about 610 feet above sea ginia is 3,000 to 5,700 feet, and in western North Carolina 79 level, and the highest point is the southern extremity of Brush Mount Mitchell, 6,711 feet high, is the highest point east of Mountain, north of Hollidaysburg, which is 2,520 feet above the Mississippi River. Throughout its extent this province sea level. The extreme relief is thus 1,910 feet. The Alle­ stands up conspicuously above the bordering provinces, from gheny Front and Dunning, Short, Loop, Lock, Tussey, Ter­ each of which it is separated by a steep, broken, rugged front race, and Broadtop Mountains rise boldly 800 to 1,500 feet from 1,000 to 3,000 feet high. In Pennsylvania, however, above the valley bottoms in a distance of 1 to 2 miles and are South Mountain, the northeast end of the Blue Ridge, is less the dominating features of the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed 11A, Little Juniata River
    08/22/01 DEP Bureau of Watershed Management Watershed Restoration Action Strategy (WRAS) State Water Plan Subbasin 11A Little Juniata River and Frankstown Branch Watersheds Blair, Huntingdon, Bedford, Cambria, and Centre Counties Introduction The 738-square mile Subbasin 11A consists of two major parts, the 395-square mile Frankstown Branch of the Juniata River watershed and its major tributaries Beaverdam Branch, Blair Gap Run, Canoe Creek, Piney Creek, and Clover Creek, and the 343-square mile Little Juniata River watershed and its major tributaries, Bald Eagle Creek, Sinking Creek, and Spruce Creek. A total of 1,051 streams flow for 1,314 miles through the subbasin. The subbasin is included in HUC Area 2050302, Upper Juniata River, a Category I, FY99/2000 Priority watershed under the Unified Watershed Assessment developed by the Department in 1998. The Frankstown Branch and the Little Juniata River join to form the man stem Juniata River at the eastern edge of the subbasin. Geology/Topography The topography and geology of the subbasin is varied, as is typical of the Ridge and Valley Ecoregion, which comprises most of the subbasin. This area consists of a series of narrow northeast-southwest trending ridges and steep, narrow valleys formed during the uplift of the Appalachian Mountain chain. Most of the mountains are folded into tight loops and form dead- end valleys. The numerous folds in the mountains result in repetition of rock types throughout the basin, with sandstone-quartzite on the ridges and limestone and shale in the valleys. The steeply sloping topography can lead to increased runoff during storm events and discourage infiltration to the groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineral Resources of the Bellefonte Quadrangle, Pennsylvania
    PLEASE DO NOT DESTROY OR THROW AWAY THIS PUBLICATION. If you have no further use for it, write to the Geological Survey at Washington and ask for a frank to return it UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE BELLEFONTE QUADRANGLE, PENNSYLVANIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 855 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 855 GEOLOGY AND MINEEAL BESOUECES OF THE BELLEFONTE QUADRANGLE, PENNSYLVANIA BY CHARLES BUTTS AND ELWOOD S. MOORE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1936 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. -------- Price 50 cents CONTENTS Page Abstract ___ -- 1 Introduction ._________________________________________________ 4 Location and area___-__--_---_-_------________________________ 4 Appalachian Highlands___-_______----_________________________ 4 Piedmont province._______________________________________ 5 Blue Ridge province ---_--_------_-__-__..-_-_-.________ 5 Valley and Ridge province_ _--___._______________ 6 Appalachian Plateaus____________________________________ 7 Drainage of the Appalachian Highlands____-__----_-_-_-.____ 8 Topography....--...- _------__--_--_____ . _ _ .... 8 General features.._______.______________ 8 Relief____ --- ---------------- ___-____------. ._ 9 Allegheny Plateau and Allegheny Mountains-_--_-----_______ 9 Bald Eagle Mountain____________________________________ 9 Nittany Mountain._______________________________________ 9 Tussey Mountain___-_____-__--___-________.______________
    [Show full text]
  • General Disclaimer One Or More of the Following Statements May Affect This Document
    General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) e Y ^... .SPect Q CQ-/ y1Q 99 Interim Report ORSER--SSEL Technical Report 9-75 RELATION OF LINE:AME1JTS TO SULFIDE DEPOSITS: BALD EAGLE MOUNTAIN, CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA* Pi. D. Krohn and D. P. Cold "Made available under NASA sponsmw in the interest of early and wide dis- samination of [0h Resources Survey Program intormatiun and without Catiility for any use mode thr.rrot." ERTS Investigation 082 Contract Number NAS 5-23133 INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF ERTS DATA WITHIN THE SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN Resource Inventory, Land Use, and Pollution (E'75-10393) RELP_TICN OF LINEAMENTS TC N75-30626 SULFIDE DEPOSITS: EAIC EAGLE MOUNTAIN, CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYIVANIA Interim Report (Pennsylvania State Univ.) 9 p HC $3.25 Unclas CsCL 08G G3/43 00393 Office for Remote Sensing of Earth Resources (ORSER) Space Science and Engineering Laboratory (SSEL) Room 219 Electrical Engineering West The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 ONSW photoophy may be posed mortr, EROS Oaft Center 10th and DODO Avenue Sioux falls, SD 51198 Principal Investigators: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle-Watching in Pennsylvania Bald Eagle State Park, Centre County
    Eagle-Watching in Pennsylvania Bald Eagle State Park, Centre County John S. Regester A Bald Eagle State Park Snapshot Facilities: Restrooms, camping, cabins, lodge, environmental center. Summer office hours: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. Driving Directions: From the west, take Interstate 80 to exit 158. Follow Route 150 north about eight miles to the main park entrance on the right. From the east, take In- terstate 80 to exit 178. Follow U.S. Route 220 north to PA Route 150. Follow Route 150 south for about 13 miles. Viewing Directions: A nest is visible from the Hunter Run Cove area at the end of Foster Joseph Sayers Road. The nest is on the south side of the lake. Common Yellowthroat Property Hours: Sunrise to sunset. Best Eagle Viewing Season: Year- round Activities at the site: Boating (unlimited hp), hunting, fishing, birding, hiking and swimming. Other Wildlife: Birds of prey, songbirds, upland ground birds, waterfowl, mam- mals, butterflies. Where to go, what to look for Jake Dingel/PGC Photo Bald Eagle State Park lies at the junction of two distinct geologic provinces. The Alle- gheny Plateau, with a rolling landscape of hills, uplands and forked streams, borders the northwest side of the park’s Foster Joseph Sayers Lake. On the southeast side, the forest slopes up Bald Eagle Mountain, the first anticline in the Ridge and Valley Prov- ince. This part of the ridge is situated on the west edge of the Appalachian Mountains. Bald Eagle State Park Vista Hal Korber/PGC Photo The surrounding mountains create a scenic backdrop for the 1,730-acre reservoir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Centre Region a Great Place to Live
    The Centre Region A great place to live.... A booklet on the economy, governance, history, society, business, services and recreation of the Centre Region 2013 This booklet was prepared by the Centre Regional Planning Agency, July 2013. Mark Boeckel - Senior Planner, Centre Regional Planning Agency Steven Arnold - GIS/Municipal Outreach Specialist, Penn State University, Ecosystem Science & Management, Geospatial Technology Program Table of Contents Sections Introduction 4 Demographics 10 Housing 16 Economics 24 Parks & Open Space 28 Transportation 32 Socioeconomics 38 Community Facilities & Services 41 Regional Cooperation 44 Contact Information 47 4 The Centre Region he Centre Region is comprised of six municipalities, Tincluding the Townships of College, Ferguson, Halfmoon, Harris, and Patton as well as the Borough of State College. Introduction The Region is home to the Pennsylvania State University, more commonly referred to as Penn State. In addition to the Borough of State College, the Region also contains several towns and villages including Boalsburg, Lemont, Pine Grove Mills, and Stormstown. The 2010 United States Census results showed the population of the Centre Region as 92,096 people. The Centre Region has a total land area of 150.2 square miles with an overall population density of 613.2 persons per square mile. Scenic view overlooking Happy Valley, Penn State University and downtown State College from atop the Tussey Mountain range.The beautiful Bald Eagle mountain range and Beaver Stadium can be seen in the background.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Susquehanna
    Middle Susquehanna Bicycleand Pedestrian Plan Middle Susquehanna Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee June 2019 Cover photos, clockwise from top left: Middle Susquehanna Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Advisory Committee Don Alexander Roy Gothie Earl Rissler Robbins Trail, Montour Township Northumberland County, MPO PennDOT State Bike/Ped Coordinator Earl’s Bike Shop in Lewisburg and member of (courtesy Susquehanna Greenway Partnership) Ann August Michael Hnatin Plain Sect community (Mennonite) Watsontown Towpath Trail Northumberland Borough Williamsport Bicycle Club President and James Saylor Representative of Public Works SEDA-COG Transportation Department (courtesy Montour Area Recreation Commission) Michelle Beiler Bucknell University Lincoln Kaufman Katie de Silva Lewisburg Borough Snyder County, MPO Clinton County, MPO (Samantha Pearson) Shannon Berkey Danville Borough Chris King David Stone 3rd Street, Williamsport Albert Carlson PennDOT District 3 Bike Coordinator for City of Williamsport (courtesy Lycoming County Department of Planning) PennDOT District 2 Jon Lavelle Bob Stoudt Lewisburg and Kelly Township, River Road Holiday Anthony Condor Lycoming County Planning Montour Area Rec Commission (Charlie Guttendorf Photography) Clinton County Housing Authority Allison Miknich Michael Suk Columbia County Geisinger Physician John DelVecchio Union County, MPO Greg Molter Rachel Swartwood Montour County, MPO Columbia County Bob Dwyer Former School District Employee in Clinton Co. Michele Ocker Holman Jerry Walls rabbittransit
    [Show full text]