DOCSLIB.ORG

Clinton County Natural Heritage Inventory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clinton County Natural Heritage Inventory CLINTON COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY Updated 2002 Jeffrey D. Wagner, Natural Heritage Ecologist Paul G. Wiegman, Director, Natural Science and Stewardship Department Charles W. Bier, Associate Director, Natural Science and Stewardship Department Lisa L. Smith, Natural Heritage Ecologist Norma L. Kline, Natural Heritage Ecologist Chris J. Boget, Data Manager Bernice K. Beck, Data Handler Western Pennsylvania Conservancy 316 Fourth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 (412)288-2777 March 1993 Printed on CLINTON COUNTY NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study was developed in part with financial assistance provided through the Recreational Improvement and Rehabilitation Act Program (RIRA Grant # RIRA-TAG-6-2), as administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Recreation and Development. Financial assistance was also provided by the Clinton County Planning Commission, the Pennsylvania Chapter of The Nature Conservancy, and the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy. The Western Pennsylvania Conservancy would like to thank all those who contributed to this inventory. Special thanks to Jann Chapman and the staff at the Clinton County office of the USDA Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (ASCS) for the use of their aerial photographs; to Ellen Dietrich at the Clinton County office of the USDA Soil Conservation Service for the use of older series aerial photographs and for her consultation on local soils; to Sue Foust and the Clinton County Conservation District for their help in making contacts in the county; to Robert Davey, Rich Kugel, Jeff Prowant, Wayne Wynick and the staff at the Bureau of Forestry's Sproul District for the use of their facilities, their time and the field trips through District #10; to Dan Devlin and the staff at the Forest Advisory Services Office for maps and advice; to Tim Holladay, Ivan McElwain and Barb Criss at the Clinton County planning office for the many resources they furnished, including office space, and for their time and good advice; to John Hancock at the Pennsylvania Game Commission for providing access to Game Lands in the county; to Jack Paulhamas for the numerous and always productive field trips on the Appalachian Plateau; to Gary Hinkle and Jim Decapria for their skillful and calm flying; and to Bill and Vicki Smedley for their hospitality and contacts in the region. The cover design and graphics were created by John Blumen, Blumen and Associates. 1 i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................... 4 DEDICATED AREAS............................................................................................................................. 21 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 24 NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS CLASSIFICATION......................................................................... 25 COUNTY OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................................... 33 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY................................................................................................... 33 SOILS.................................................................................................................................................... 36 VEGETATION ..................................................................................................................................... 37 PENNSYLVANIA NATURAL DIVERSITY INVENTORY ............................................................... 42 NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY METHODS........................................................................... 43 GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS ..................................................................................................................................................... 45 LAND-USES AND POTENTIAL THREATS TO NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS........................ 47 BUFFERS.............................................................................................................................................. 54 RESULTS................................................................................................................................................. 55 LITERATURE CITED ........................................................................................................................ 152 APPENDIX I: Status of Species........................................................................................................... 155 A. FEDERAL STATUS................................................................................................................. 155 B. PENNSYLVANIA STATUS.................................................................................................... 156 C. GLOBAL AND STATE RANKING: GLOBAL ELEMENT RANKS.................................... 160 APPENDIX II: County Significance Ranks ....................................................................................... 163 APPENDIX III: NHI Site Survey Form............................................................................................... 164 APPENDIX IV: NHI Site Recommendation Form.............................................................................. 166 APPENDIX V: Classification of Natural Communities in PA ......................................................... 167 LIST OF FIGURES Page Physiographic Provinces of Clinton County ..................................................................................................... 35 Clinton County NHI Summary Map..................................................................................................................56 2 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1: Summary of Natural Heritage Areas in order of relative county significance.................................... 4 Table 2: Summary of Natural Heritage Areas by Municipality ...................................................................... 14 Table 3: Important managed lands protecting biotic resources in Clinton County. ........................................ 21 Tables summarizing USGS quadrangles: BEECH CREEK………………………………………………………………………………………….115 CARROLL……………………………………………………………………………………………….145 FARRANDSVILLE…………………………………………………………………………….………..112 GLEN UNION………………………………………………………………………………….………..109 HAMMERSLEY FORK………………………………………………………………………..…………70 HOWARD NORTHWEST…………………………………………………………………………......….96 HOWARD………………………………………………………………………………………………....94 JERSEY MILLS………………………………………………………………………………………….131 JERSEY SHORE……………………………………………………………………………………....…134 KEATING………………………………………………………………………………………………....65 LINDEN…………………………………………………………………………………………….……149 LOCK HAVEN…………………………………………………………………………………………..129 LOGANTON……………………………………………………………………………………………..137 MADISONBURG...............................................................................................................................……....118 MILL HALL……………………………………………………………………………………………...122 MILLHEIM......................................................................................................................................…….......120 POTTERSDALE.................................................................................................................................……......61 RENOVO EAST.............................................………………………………...............................................100 RENOVO WEST......................................................................…………........................................................82 SINNEMAHONING………………………………………………………………………………………56 SLATE RUN…….................................................................................................…......................................107 SNOW SHOE NORTHEAST………..……………………………………………………………… …..86 SNOW SHOE NORTHWEST...........…..........................................................................................................63 SNOW SHOE SOUTHEAST……………………………………………………………………….…….92 TAMARACK………………………………….……………………………………………………. …..77 WOODWARD...................................................….........................................................................................143 YOUNG WOMAN’S CREEK…………………..…………...…………………………………………..104 3 ABSTRACT The natural heritage sites that have qualified for inclusion in this report are ranked according to their significance as areas of importance to the biological diversity and ecological integrity of the county. Also included in this evaluation is the level of state and/or global significance ("S" or "G" rank). The three county significance ranks are Exceptional, High, and Notable significance. The three county ranks have been used to prioritize all identified sites and suggest the relative attention that sites should receive for the amount, degree and rate of protection. The sites are in alphabetical order for each level. Designation as to type of natural heritage site (NA=Natural Area, BDA=Biological Diversity Area, DA=Dedicated Area, LCA=Landscape Conservation Area, OHA=Other Heritage Area) is included as part of the site name. Refer to the "Introduction" section for explanations of these site categories. Definitions of the three county significance ranks are given in Appendix II. * denotes sites added during 2002 NHI update. + denotes areas for which boundaries
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department of Planning and Zoning
    Department of Planning and Zoning Subject: Howard County Landscape Manual Updates: Recommended Street Tree List (Appendix B) and Recommended Plant List (Appendix C) - Effective July 1, 2010 To: DLD Review Staff Homebuilders Committee From: Kent Sheubrooks, Acting Chief Division of Land Development Date: July 1, 2010 Purpose: The purpose of this policy memorandum is to update the Recommended Plant Lists presently contained in the Landscape Manual. The plant lists were created for the first edition of the Manual in 1993 before information was available about invasive qualities of certain recommended plants contained in those lists (Norway Maple, Bradford Pear, etc.). Additionally, diseases and pests have made some other plants undesirable (Ash, Austrian Pine, etc.). The Howard County General Plan 2000 and subsequent environmental and community planning publications such as the Route 1 and Route 40 Manuals and the Green Neighborhood Design Guidelines have promoted the desirability of using native plants in landscape plantings. Therefore, this policy seeks to update the Recommended Plant Lists by identifying invasive plant species and disease or pest ridden plants for their removal and prohibition from further planting in Howard County and to add other available native plants which have desirable characteristics for street tree or general landscape use for inclusion on the Recommended Plant Lists. Please note that a comprehensive review of the street tree and landscape tree lists were conducted for the purpose of this update, however, only
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G
    A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF RHODODENDRON L. SECTION PENTANTHERA G. DON (ERICACEAE) BY KATHLEEN ANNE KRON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1987 , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the supervision and encouragement given to me by Dr. Walter S. Judd. I thoroughly enjoyed my work under his direction. I would also like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Bijan Dehgan, Dr. Dana G. Griffin, III, Dr. James W. Kimbrough, Dr. Jonathon Reiskind, Dr. William Louis Stern, and Dr. Norris H. Williams for their critical comments and suggestions. The National Science Foundation generously supported this project in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant;* field work in 1985 was supported by a grant from the Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, North Carolina. I thank the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of their material: A, AUA, BHA, DUKE, E, FSU, GA, GH, ISTE, JEPS , KW, KY, LAF, LE NCSC, NCU, NLU NO, OSC, PE, PH, LSU , M, MAK, MOAR, NA, , RSA/POM, SMU, SZ, TENN, TEX, TI, UARK, UC, UNA, USF, VDB, VPI, W, WA, WVA. My appreciation also is offered to the illustrators, Gerald Masters, Elizabeth Hall, Rosa Lee, Lisa Modola, and Virginia Tomat. I thank Dr. R. Howard * BSR-8601236 ii Berg for the scanning electron micrographs. Mr. Bart Schutzman graciously made available his computer program to plot the results of the principal components analyses. The herbarium staff, especially Mr. Kent D. Perkins, was always helpful and their service is greatly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • A STUDY of the TYRONE - MOUNT Udion LINEAMENT by REMOTE SENSING TECHNIWES and Fleld NIETHQDS
    A STUDY OF THE TYRONE - MOUNT UdION LINEAMENT BY REMOTE SENSING TECHNIWES AND FlELD NIETHQDS Con- NAS 5-22822 0. P. Gold, Principal Indga@x ORSER Technical Report 12-77 Office for Ramow Sensing of Earth Resources 219 Electrical Engineering West University Park, PA 16802 Prepared for GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER Greenbelt, MD 20771 The field invesrigations and much of the analvsis descrihrd in this report were used as the basis for a payer in Crology. submtttrd by Elicharl R. Cnnich to tbe Departmc~~tof ~:t~oscic-~\c~?i, in partial iu!ffllment of the rrqufrrurznts tor tlrc Mastt-r- oi Science Dcgrre. b I r T-nd- r RoonOlk I A S~~M)YOF ms ~RONR- ~\nurWIW LIN~BY December 1977 RBWTS SMSSIUC TECHNIQUS AND FlliLD t4STHWS 6 hnwym-- - r Technical Report 12-?7 J 7. habftd a -@-mQImwwn-amL David P. Gold, Principal Inwe8tigator m , 10. WRk uau Wa e m)a~~mt-#y#mdMem Office for Remote Senaing of Earth Resources 219 Electrical Bngineerin8 West Building rt. bn~nar ~nn\ &. \ The Pennsylvania State Uniwrsi ty NA!! 5-22822 University Park, PA 16802 13 ~*oro@~.om.ndhd~CI tr sponss~lr-v-nd~ddnr Final Report 11 1176-6/30/77 Caddard Space Flight Center I Crecnbelt, ND 20771 4 m.LI Field work was combined with satellite imagery and photography to study the Tyrone - Pkrunt Union lineament in Blair and Huntingdon Counties, central Pennsylvania. This feature, expressed as the valleys containing the Little Juniata and Juniata River: . transgtesscs the nose of the southwest-plunging Nittany Anticlinorium in the western extremity of the Valley ;~ndRidge Province.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Hammering the Hammersley
    Summer 2013 Hammering the Hammersley By Wands Shirk, President, Susquehannock Trail Club deck for Saturday's work detail, plus six boys from Boy One of the ways the Keystone Trails Association benefits Scout Troop 538 in Lewisburg, PA. Scout leader Steve hiking trail clubs is assisting with trail maintenance when Everson last winter had read about the planned trail care Mother Nature gets ahead of us on trails from time to weekend on the KTA website and brought six hard- time. After KTA's Ed Lawrence hiked a section of the working teenagers along with himself and a co-leader to Susquehannock Trail System (STS) in Potter County last camp in the Hammersley overnight and do trail work on summer with his wife Cathy and good friend (and former Saturday and Sunday. The Scout troop was preparing to KTA executive director) Paul Shaw, Ed offered to let the go to Philmont in July, and needed to do some shakedown Susquehannock Trail Club (STC) host a KTA trail care this backpacking to get in shape for their High Adventure trip. May to "Hammer the Hammersley." The KTA volunteers separated themselves into specialized Pennsylvania has 16 designated "Wild Areas," in which teams. Tom Bastian began Saturday early and carried out a timber harvesting, resource development, and motorized day-long attack on the big woody items. He hiked a chain transport of all sorts is prohibited. At 30,253 acres, the saw the entire ten-mile length of the Hammersley section Hammersley Wild is second in size only to the Quehanna and cleared all the blowdowns from south to north.
    [Show full text]
  • Jjjn'iwi'li Jmliipii Ill ^ANGLER
    JJJn'IWi'li jMlIipii ill ^ANGLER/ Ran a Looks A Bulltrog SEPTEMBER 1936 7 OFFICIAL STATE September, 1936 PUBLICATION ^ANGLER Vol.5 No. 9 C'^IP-^ '" . : - ==«rs> PUBLISHED MONTHLY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA by the BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS HI Five cents a copy — 50 cents a year OLIVER M. DEIBLER Commissioner of Fisheries C. R. BULLER 1 1 f Chief Fish Culturist, Bellefonte ALEX P. SWEIGART, Editor 111 South Office Bldg., Harrisburg, Pa. MEMBERS OF BOARD OLIVER M. DEIBLER, Chairman Greensburg iii MILTON L. PEEK Devon NOTE CHARLES A. FRENCH Subscriptions to the PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER Elwood City should be addressed to the Editor. Submit fee either HARRY E. WEBER by check or money order payable to the Common­ Philipsburg wealth of Pennsylvania. Stamps not acceptable. SAMUEL J. TRUSCOTT Individuals sending cash do so at their own risk. Dalton DAN R. SCHNABEL 111 Johnstown EDGAR W. NICHOLSON PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER welcomes contribu­ Philadelphia tions and photos of catches from its readers. Pro­ KENNETH A. REID per credit will be given to contributors. Connellsville All contributors returned if accompanied by first H. R. STACKHOUSE class postage. Secretary to Board =*KT> IMPORTANT—The Editor should be notified immediately of change in subscriber's address Please give both old and new addresses Permission to reprint will be granted provided proper credit notice is given Vol. 5 No. 9 SEPTEMBER, 1936 *ANGLER7 WHAT IS BEING DONE ABOUT STREAM POLLUTION By GROVER C. LADNER Deputy Attorney General and President, Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen PORTSMEN need not be told that stream pollution is a long uphill fight.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRE COUNTY Recreation & Greenway Plan
    )" (! kh " (! ¤£ " ¨¦§ jg " (! ¨¦§ jg )" " )" ! jg (! ( jg (! jg jg jg " · )" ¨¦§ jg (! )" !|!M¾Ð " jg " jg )" " jg ²³ · " (! ÆQ ¤£ jg (! ¨¦§ jgn " (! (!jg jg jg jg jg · )" × ²³â kh!|â ²¸ " â !M n ·â (! â Greenways â jg ¨¦§ â ! â â ( jg !Mâ â â jg (! â CENTRE COUNTY Recreation & Greenway Plajgn: C×eâ ntre Reg¤£ ion â â â â â C7 - Spring Creek Canyon Greenway â !M â â â !| â â )" ÆI â · !M STATE GAME LANDS 103 · ù C30 - Halfmoon Wildlife Corridor(! Greenway T7 â (!(! (!â " C19 â â " C31 - Musser Gap Greenway T7 BOGGS TWP â jg jg (! â (! Pâleasant View â â WALKER TWP (! â R2 - Lewisburg and Tyrone Railroad Greenway â · ⠾Рjg â " !| Þ Þ R10 - Bellefonte Central Rail Trail Greenway ¾Ð Sunnyside n 550 jg !y ·××¾ÐnÆc × )" jg S-119 ¾Ð × kh ×n T3 !y ²¸²¸T××6 × j UNION TWP ÞÆc·(!ײ³Bellefonte (! Conservation Cojgrridors !( )" !M jg ²¸ · (! ²³kh¾Ð· Colevill·e × · C6 - Spr(!ing C·r·eek n !Ï!y · )" C8 - Buffal¾Ðo Run !y S-71 Unionville × jg ×C6 !M (! BLACK MOSHANNON SjTATE PARK Þ (! C28 - Spkh×ruce× Creek Valley View (! C29 - Slab Cabin Run RUSH TWP n C10 " n · ! C32 - Roaring Run !M( · kh SPRING TWP C33 - Gailbrlaith Gap jg jg Sp!kring Creek Axemann (! × Recreation Corridors !( ¤£220 · · × (! C27 !M )"26 R1 - Mid State Trail (! BENNER TWP Þ R9 - Colyer Lakjge to Tussey Mountain ¤£ R10 !k · MOSHANNONSTATE FOREST HUSTON TWP jg BALD EAGLE STATE FOREST R24 - Patton Woods/Haugh Farm ·! n )" ( Pleasant Gap × jg R25 - Arboretum Section of the Bellefonte Central Rail Trail R19 jg²³ )"150 )"144 (! (! Julian R26 - Musser Gap Greenway Connection · 99 !M
    [Show full text]
  • View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX
    GIJIDEBOOJ< TECTONICS AND. CAMBRIAN·ORDO'IICIAN STRATIGRAPHY CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Pifftbutgh Geological Society with the Appalachian Geological Society Septembet, 1963 TECTONICS AND CAMBRIAN -ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY in the CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA FIELD CONFERENCE SPONSORS Pittsburgh Geological Society Appalachian Geological Society September 19, 20, 21, 1963 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 2 Cambro-Ordovician Stratigraphy of Central and South-Central 3 Pennsylvania by W. R. Wagner Fold Patterns and Continuous Deformation Mechanisms of the 13 Central Pennsylvania Folded Appalachians by R. P. Nickelsen Road Log 1st day: Bedford to State College 31 2nd day: State College to Hagerstown 65 3rd day: Hagerstown to Bedford 11.5 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Wagner paper: Figure 1. Stratigraphic cross-section of Upper-Cambrian 4 in central and south-central Pennsylvania Figure 2. Stratigraphic section of St.Paul-Beekmantown 6 rocks in central Pennsylvania and nearby Maryland Nickelsen paper: Figure 1. Geologic map of Pennsylvania 15 Figure 2. Structural lithic units and Size-Orders of folds 18 in central Pennsylvania Figure 3. Camera lucida sketches of cleavage and folds 23 Figure 4. Schematic drawing of rotational movements in 27 flexure folds Road Log: Figure 1. Route of Field Trip 30 Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for route of Field Trip 34 Figure 3. Cross-section of Martin, Miller and Rankey wells- 41 Stops I and II Figure 4. Map and cross-sections in sinking Valley area- 55 Stop III Figure 5. Panorama view of Valley and Ridge structures from ?:r Stop IX Figure 6. Camera lucida sketch of sedimentary features in ?6 contorted shale - Stop X Figure 7- Cleavage and bedding relationship at Stop XI ?9 Figure 8.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014
    PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014 What is Primitive Camping? Primitive camping is a simplistic style of camping. Campers hike, pedal or paddle to reach a location and spend the night without the presence of developed facilities. This primitive camping experience takes place off the beaten path, where piped water, restrooms and other amenities are not provided. You pack in all you need, exchanging a few conveniences for the solitude found in the back country setting. Fresh air, fewer people and out-of-the-way natural landscapes are some of the benefits of primitive camping. Once off the beaten path, however, additional advantages begin to surface such as a deeper awareness and greater appreciation of the outdoor world around you. Primitive camping also builds outdoor skills and fosters a gratifying sense of self-sufficiency. Where to Camp Pennsylvania has 2.2 million acres of state forest land with 2,500 miles of trails and 5,132 miles of Camping at rivers and streams winding through it. Hiking, biking and multi-use trails traverse most state forest districts and six districts have designated water trails that transect state forest land. Forest Districts State parks are not open to primitive camping. However, with the exception of William Penn State Forest, all state forest districts are open to this activity. Camping is not permitted in designated STATE FOREST DISTRICTS: natural areas or at vistas, trail heads, picnic areas and areas that are posted closed to camping. Bald Eagle State Forest (570) 922-3344 Contact a forest district office for specific information, maps and Camping Permits (if needed).
    [Show full text]
  • Alkaline Addition Problems at the Skytop/Interstate-99 Site, Central Pennsylvania1
    ALKALINE ADDITION PROBLEMS AT THE SKYTOP/INTERSTATE-99 SITE, CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA1 Arthur W. Rose and Hubert L. Barnes2 Abstract. In 2002-3, approximately 8x105 m3 of pyrite-bearing Bald Eagle sandstone and Reedsville shale were removed from a large road cut through Bald Eagle Ridge near State College, PA. The rock contained an average of about 4.5% pyrite as veins and fine veinlet networks across 200 m of road cut. Smaller amounts of ZnS and other heavy metal sulfides accompany the pyrite. The rock was placed in 9 nearby locations, including large waste piles and several valley fills, two ‘buttresses” and a lane elevation along about 0.8 km of hillside that was threatening to slide into the road. During excavation of the cut, pyrite was recognized as a potential problem and considerable lime was added as layers to the various piles. Despite the lime addition, highly acidic seeps emerged from the piles and fills, with pH 2.0 to 2.7, Fe 90-1500 mg/L, and acidities as high as 18,000 mg/L (as CaCO3). These results clearly show that addition of lime and other alkaline materials as layers is not effective. In experiments to test remediation methods, Bauxsol slurry was sprayed onto part of the buttress area but failed to prevent continuing acid seepages. Inspection trenches showed little penetration of the Bauxsol, and demonstrated the presence of the added lime as impermeable lime layers within the buttress. Bucket tests of mixtures of alkaline circulating fluidized-bed ash with pyritic rocks, when well mixed, gave alkaline effluents.
    [Show full text]