DOCSLIB.ORG

ITU Operational Bulletin No.887 Du 1.VI.2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ITU Operational Bulletin No. 887 1.VII.2007 (Information received by 25 June 2007) Table of Contents Page General information Lists annexed to the ITU Operational Bulletin: Note from TSB.............................................................. 3 Approval of ITU-T Recommendations................................................................................................... 4 International Public Telecommunication Numbering Plan (ITU-T Recommendation E.164 (02/2005)): Note from TSB, Identification codes for international networks ........................................................ 4 International Identification Plan for Mobile Terminals and Mobile Users (ITU-T Recom- mendation E.212 (05/2004)): Identification codes for international mobile networks....................... 5 Assignment of Signalling Area/Network Codes (SANC) (ITU-T Recommendation Q.708 (03/99)): Brazil, Montenegro, Venezuela ......................................................................................................... 5 Telephone Service: Belarus (Ministry of Communications and Informatization, Minsk)............................................... 5 British Virgin Islands (Telecommunications Regulatory Commission, Road Town, Tortola) ........... 6 Egypt (National Telecom Regulatory Authority (NTRA), Cairo) ..................................................... 6 Finland (Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority (FICORA), Helsinki) ................................. 13 The Former Yugoslav Rep. of Macedonia (Agency for Electronic Communications, Skopje)......... 13 Mongolia (Communications Regulatory Commission of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar) ......................... 13 United Kingdom (Office of Communications (Ofcom), London) ................................................... 14 Turks and Caicos Islands (Turks and Caicos Telecommunications Commission, Providenciales) .... 15 Changes in the Administrations/ROAs and other entities or Organizations: Germany (Alcatel SEL AG, Stuttgart: Change in name) ................................................................ 16 Malaysia (DiGi Telecommunications Sdn. Bhd., Shah Alam, Selangor: Change in address) .......... 16 Mongolia (Mongolia Telecommunications Company (MTC), Ulaanbaatar: Change in name) (Information and Communications Technology Authority (ICTA), Ulaanbaatar: List of telecommunication operators and service providers in Mongolia to which the status of Recognized Operating Agency (ROA) has been granted)........................................................... 16 Czech Rep. (Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic, Praha: Change in address) ... 17 Serbia (Ministry of Capital Investments, Belgrade: Change in name)............................................ 18 Slovakia (Slovak Telekom, a.s., Bratislava: Change in address) ..................................................... 18 Sri Lanka (MTN Networks (Pvt) Ltd, Colombo: Change in name) ................................................. 18 Service Restrictions: Note from TSB ..................................................................................................... 19 Call-Back and alternative calling procedures (Res. 21 Rev. PP-2002): Note from TSB............................ 20 International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Dates of publication of the next including information Operational Bulletins received by: Place des Nations CH-1211 Genève 20 (Switzerland) No. 888 15.VII.2007 9.VII.2007 No. 889 1.VIII.2007 25.VII.2007 Tel: +41 22 730 5111 No. 890 15.VIII.2007 8.VIII.2007 www.itu.int/itu-t/bulletin/index.html Fax: +41 22 730 5853 E-mail: [email protected] Contact Telecommunication Contact Radiocommunication +41 22 733 7256 [email protected] Standardization Bureau (TSB): Bureau (BR): [email protected] Tel: +41 22 730 5222 Tel: +41 22 730 5217 Fax: +41 22 730 5853 Fax: +41 22 730 5785 Page Amendments to service publications List of Issuer Identifier Numbers for the international telecommunication charge card ........................ 21 Access codes/numbers for mobile networks ........................................................................................ 21 Dialling Procedures (International prefix, national (trunk) prefix and national (significant) number) ..... 22 List of ITU-T Recommendation E.164 assigned Country Codes............................................................. 22 Mobile Network Code (MNC) for the international identification plan for mobile terminals and mobile users.................................................................................................................................................. 23 List of Mobile Country or Geographical Area Codes............................................................................. 23 List of Telegram Destination Indicators ................................................................................................ 24 List of ITU Carrier Codes ...................................................................................................................... 24 List of Signalling Area/Network Codes (SANC) .................................................................................... 24 List of International Signalling Point Codes (ISPC) ................................................................................ 25 National Numbering Plan..................................................................................................................... 26 Annex List of International Signalling Point Codes (ISPC) (According to ITU-T Recommendation Q.708 (03/99)) (Position on 1 July 2007) No. 887 – 2 ITU Operational Bulletin GENERAL INFORMATION Lists annexed to the ITU Operational Bulletin Note from TSB A. The following Lists have been published by TSB or BR as Annexes to the ITU Operational Bulletin (OB): OB No. 887 List of International Signalling Point Codes (ISPC) (According to ITU-T Recommen- dation Q.708 (03/99)) (Position on 1 July 2007) 883 List of Issuer Identifier Numbers for the International Telecommunication Charge Card (In accordance with ITU-T Recommendation E.118 (05/2006)) (Position on 1 May 2007) 883 Status of Radiocommunications between Amateur Stations of different Countries (In accordance with optional provision No. 25.1 of the Radio Regulations) and Form of Call Signs assigned by each Administration to its Amateur and Experimental Stations (Position on 1 May 2007) 881 List of Signalling Area/Network Codes (SANC) (Complement to ITU-T Recommen- dation Q.708 (03/99)) (Position on 1 April 2007) 880 List of Names of Administration Management Domains (ADMD) (In accordance with ITU-T F.400 and X.400 series Recommendations) (Position on 15 March 2007) 879 List of Telegram Destination Indicators (In accordance with ITU-T Recommen- dation F.32 (10/1995)) (Position on 1 March 2007) 878 List of Telex Destination Codes (TDC) and Telex Network Identification Codes (TNIC) (Complement to ITU-T Recommendations F.69 and F.68) (Position on 15 February 2007) 877 List of Country or Geographical Area Codes for non-standard facilities in telematic services (Complement to ITU-T Recommendation T.35 (02/2000)) (Position on 1 February 2007) 876 List of Data Network Identification Codes (DNIC) (According to ITU-T Recommen- dation X.121 (10/2000)) (Position on 15 January 2007) 875 List of Data Country or Geographical Area Codes (Complement to ITU-T Recommen- dation X.121 (10/2000)) (Position on 1 January 2007) 873 Access codes/numbers for mobile networks (According to ITU-T Recommendation E.164 (02/2005)) (Position on 1 December 2006) 871 Mobile Network Code (MNC) for the international identification plan for mobile terminals and mobile users (According to ITU-T Recommendation E.212 (05/2004)) (Position on 1 November 2006) 870 List of ITU-T Recommendation E.164 assigned country codes (Complement to ITU-T Recommendation E.164 (02/2005)) (Position on 15 October 2006) 849 Dialling Procedures (International prefix, national (trunk) prefix and national (significant) number) (In accordance with ITU-T Recommendation E.164 (02/2005)) (Position on 1 December 2005) 841 List of terrestrial trunk radio mobile country codes (Complement to ITU-T Recommen- dation E.218 (05/2004)) (Position on 1 August 2005) 839 List of Mobile Country or Geographical Area Codes (Complement to ITU-T Recommen- dation E.212 (05/2004)) (Position on 1 July 2005) 781 Various tones used in national networks (According to ITU-T Recommendation E.180 (03/98)) (Position on 1 February 2003) 669 Five-letter Code Groups for the use of the International Public Telegram Service (According to ITU-T Recommendation F.1 (03/1998)) B. The following Lists are available online from the ITU-T website: List of ITU Carrier Codes (ITU-T Rec. M.1400 (01/2004)) www.itu.int/ITU-T/inr/icc/index.html Bureaufax Table (ITU-T Rec. F.170) www.itu.int/ITU-T/inr/bureaufax/index.html ITU Operational Bulletin N.o 887 – 3 Approval of ITU-T Recommendations By TSB AAP-61, it was announced that the following ITU-T Recommendations were approved, in accordance with the procedures outlined in ITU-T Recommendation A.8: – ITU-T Recommendation E.115 (29/05/2007): Computerized directory assistance – ITU-T Recommendation X.690 (2002) Corr. 1 (29/05/2007): Clarification of certain CER encodings – ITU-T Recommendation X.691 (2002) Amendment 3 (29/05/2007): PER encoding instructions – ITU-T Recommendation X.693 (2001) Amendment 3 (29/05/2007): PER encoding instructions – ITU-T Recommendation X.694 (2004) Amendment 1 (29/05/2007): Efficiency enhancements including time type support and xs: any – ITU-T Recommendation
Recommended publications
  • FCC-06-11A1.Pdf

    FCC-06-11A1.Pdf

    Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-11 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition ) MB Docket No. 05-255 in the Market for the Delivery of Video ) Programming ) TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT Adopted: February 10, 2006 Released: March 3, 2006 Comment Date: April 3, 2006 Reply Comment Date: April 18, 2006 By the Commission: Chairman Martin, Commissioners Copps, Adelstein, and Tate issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Scope of this Report......................................................................................................................... 2 B. Summary.......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. The Current State of Competition: 2005 ................................................................................... 4 2. General Findings ....................................................................................................................... 6 3. Specific Findings....................................................................................................................... 8 II. COMPETITORS IN THE MARKET FOR THE DELIVERY OF VIDEO PROGRAMMING ......... 27 A. Cable Television Service ..............................................................................................................
  • Certificate of Service

    Certificate of Service

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Charlotte R. Graham, hereby certify that the persons on the attached list were served copies ofthe Public Notice ofNetwork Change Under Rule 51.329(a) filed on the 26th day of July, 2002, with the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Such notification was provided via U.S. First Class Mail, postage prepaid, or by electronic transmission at least five business days in advance of filing with the Commission. ~Q.~ Charlotte R. Graham _ ..__._-------------------------------------- 1-800-Reconex 1-800-Reconex 1-800-Reconex Bill Braun Jennifer Loewen Dale Merten 2500 Industrial Ave. 2500 Industrial Avenue 2500 Industrial Avenue Hubbard, OR 97032 Hubbard, OR 97032 Hubbard, OR 97032 1-800-Reconex 2-Infinity Access America Jennifer Sikes Lex Long Dan Barnett 2500 Industrial Ave 4828 Loop Central Dr. 315 W. Oakland Ave. Hubbard, OR 97032 Ste. 100 Johnson City, TN 37601 Houston, TX 77081 Access America Access Long Distance Access Long Distance Jack Coker Tammy Hampton Christina Moody 138 Fairbanks Plaza 215 S. State Street 3753 Howard Hughes Pkwy Oakridge, TN 37830 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Suite 131 Las Vegas, NV 89109 Access One (The Other Phone Company) ACN Communications ACT (Alternate Communications Kevin Griffo S. Meyer Technology) 3427 NW. 55th 32991 Hamilton Benjamin Bickham Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 Farmington Hills, MI 48334 6253 W. 800 N. Fountaintown, IN 46130 Adams Communications Adelphia Business Solutions Adelphia Business Solutions Jimmy Adams Rebecca Baldwin Stacey Chick P.O. Box 487 1221 Lamar Street 121 Champion Way Marianna, FL 324470487 Ste. 1175 Canonsburg, PA 15317 Houston, TX 770I0 Adelphia Business Solutions Adelphia Business Solutions Adelphia Business Solutions Rod Fletcher Richard Kindred Janet Livengood 121 Champion Way 500 Atrium Drive 3000 K St., NW.
  • Promoting Competition in the Telecommunications Markets: Why the FCC Should Adopt a Less Stringent Approach to Its Review of Section 271 Applications Eric M

    Promoting Competition in the Telecommunications Markets: Why the FCC Should Adopt a Less Stringent Approach to Its Review of Section 271 Applications Eric M

    Cornell Law Review Volume 84 Article 8 Issue 5 July 1999 Promoting Competition in the Telecommunications Markets: Why the FCC Should Adopt a Less Stringent Approach to Its Review of Section 271 Applications Eric M. Swedenburg Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Eric M. Swedenburg, Promoting Competition in the Telecommunications Markets: Why the FCC Should Adopt a Less Stringent Approach to Its Review of Section 271 Applications , 84 Cornell L. Rev. 1418 (1999) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol84/iss5/8 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTE PROMOTING COMPETITION IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS MARKETS: WHY THE FCC SHOULD ADOPT A LESS STRINGENT APPROACH TO ITS REVIEW OF SECTION 271 APPLICATIONS Eric M. Swedenburgj INTRODUcn ON ................................................. 1419 I. THE EVOLUTION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS LAW IN THE UNITED STATES ......................................... 1423 A. The Telecommunications Industry and Its Regulation Prior to the 1996 Act ................... 1423 1. Origins of the Telecommunications Industry and the FCC ............................................ 1423 2. The Divestiture of AT&T ......................... 1426 B. The Events Leading to Congress's Passing of the 1996 A ct ............................................ 1429 II. THE SECTION 271 APPuCATION PROCESS AND THE FCC APPROACH DURING THE FIRST Two YEARS OF THE 1996 A cr .................................................... 1432 A. The Mechanics of Section 271 ...................... 1433 1.
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Form 20-F MOBILE TELESYSTEMS OJSC

    UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Form 20-F MOBILE TELESYSTEMS OJSC

    MERRILL CORPORATION LPALLES//18-APR-13 11:34 DISK135:[12ZDM1.12ZDM79201]BA79201A.;7 mrll_1111.fmt Free: 42DM/0D Foot: 0D/ 0D VJ Seq: 1 Clr: 0 DISK024:[PAGER.PSTYLES]UNIVERSAL.BST;102 3 C Cs: 2075 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 Form 20-F អ Registration Statement pursuant to Section 12(b) or (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or ፤ Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 or អ Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or អ Shell company report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of event requiring this shell company report Commission file number 333-12032 15JUN201106100788 MOBILE TELESYSTEMS OJSC (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Not Applicable (Translation of Registrant’s name into English) RUSSIAN FEDERATION (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 4 Marksistskaya Street, Moscow 109147 Russian Federation (Address of Principal Executive Offices) Joshua B. Tulgan Director, Investor Relations Mobile TeleSystems OJSC 5 Vorontsovskaya Street, bldg. 2, 109147 Moscow Russian Federation Phone: +7 495 223 20 25, Fax: +7 495 911 65 67 E-mail: [email protected] (Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on which Registered AMERICAN DEPOSITARY SHARES,
  • Syria: Syrian Telecommunications Establishment, Syrian Computer Society

    Syria: Syrian Telecommunications Establishment, Syrian Computer Society

    2 ENEMIES OF THE INTERNET / 12 MARCH 2014 //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 4 EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA .................................................................................. 8 Belarus: Operations and Analysis Centre ....................................................... 8 Russia: Federal Security Service ............................................................................ 10 Turkmenistan: TurkmenTelecom ............................................................................. 12 United Kingdom: Government Communications Headquarters ....................... 13 Uzbekistan: Expert Commission on Information and Mass Communication ................................................................................. 16 AMERICAS .................................................................................................................... 18 Cuba: Ministry of Informatics and Communications ............................................ 18 USA: National Security Agency ............................................................................... 20 MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA ............................................................................... 23 Bahrain: Ministry of Interior, National Security Apparatus ............................................................................ 23 Iran: Supreme Council for Cyberspace, Working Group
  • Telecommunications Industry in Florida Annual Report to the Florida

    Telecommunications Industry in Florida Annual Report to the Florida

    Annual Report to the Florida Legislature ON THE STATUS OF COMPETITION IN THE Telecommunications Industry in Florida A S O F M A Y 3 1 , 2 0 0 4 FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION This report was prepared by the Florida Public Service Commission’s Office of Market Monitoring and Strategic Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES............................................................................................ v LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND........................................................ 4 A. PROVISIONS AND GOALS OF CHAPTER 364, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996 .............................................................................. 6 1. Chapter 364, Florida Statutes .............................................................................. 6 2. Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the 1996 Act).................................. 6 B. METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................. 8 CHAPTER II: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CHANGING COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE .................................................................................................................... 9 A. INNOVATION IN A RAPIDLY CONVERGING MARKET........................................................
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 in the Matter of ) ) Second Application by Bellsouth Corpora

    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 in the Matter of ) ) Second Application by Bellsouth Corpora

    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Second Application by BellSouth Corporation, ) BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., and ) BellSouth Long Distance, Inc., for ) CC Docket No. 98-121 Provision of In-Region, InterLATA ) Services in Louisiana ) ) _______________________________________________________ EVALUATION OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE _______________________________________________________ Joel I. Klein A. Douglas Melamed Assistant Attorney General Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Antitrust Division Antitrust Division Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to: Donald J. Russell Chief David F. Smutny W. Robert Majure Luin Fitch Assistant Chief Carl Willner Economic Regulatory Section Brent E. Marshall Anu Seam Attorneys Telecommunications Task Force August 19, 1998 Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Justice BellSouth - Louisiana (August 19, 1998) TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ...........................................................ii Index of Full Citations ....................................................... iii Summary of Evaluation ...................................................... xi Introduction ...............................................................1 I. The State of Competition in Louisiana ......................................4 II. BellSouth’s Requirement That New Entrants May Combine UNEs Only Through Collocation Imposes Unnecessary Costs, Delay and Technical Obstacles ............................................................9
  • An In-Depth Study on the Broadband Infrastructure in Afghanistan and Mongolia

    An In-Depth Study on the Broadband Infrastructure in Afghanistan and Mongolia

    An In-Depth Study on the Broadband Infrastructure in Afghanistan and Mongolia The secretariat of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) is the regional development arm of the United Nations and serves as the main economic and social development centre for the United Nations in Asia and the Pacific. Its mandate is to foster cooperation among its 53 members and 9 associate members. It provides the strategic link between global and country-level programmes and issues. It supports Governments of countries in the region in consolidating regional positions and advocates regional approaches to meeting the region’s unique socioeconomic challenges in a globalizing world. The ESCAP secretariat is in Bangkok. Please visit the ESCAP website at http://www.unescap.org for further information. The shaded areas of the map indicate ESCAP members and associate members. An In-Depth Study on the Broadband Infrastructure in Afghanistan and Mongolia © United Nations, 2016 This study has been prepared for ESCAP by Michael Ruddy and Esra Ozdemir, Terabit Consulting. The views expressed herein are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations. The information contained is based primarily on interviews, published and unpublished data, and presentations by members of the industry. The designations employed and material presented do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. References and maps obtained from external sources might not conform to the United Nations editorial guidelines.
  • Annual Report 2017 Pre-Approved by the Resolution of MTS PJSC Board of Directors May 28, 2018, Minutes No

    Annual Report 2017 Pre-Approved by the Resolution of MTS PJSC Board of Directors May 28, 2018, Minutes No

    Annual Report 2017 Pre-approved by the resolution of MTS PJSC Board of Directors May 28, 2018, Minutes No. ____ Approved by Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of MTS PJSC June 28, 2018, Minutes No. ____ Today we live in the world where products and services that were above a beyond only yesterday are now reality. It is a world of augmented and refined reality where there is no borderline between the ordinary and the virtual and deprived of physical realization. This is the dimension in which MTS is a link between needs and innovative solutions. MTS. Improved reality 1 Welcome to 2017 MTS PJSC Annual Report This is 2017 MTS PJSC Annual Report, which we have Annual Report Structure been preparing for you since 2001. The report comprises four main sections: Purpose of the 2017 Annual Report • About the Company; • Management Report; To represent MTS as an innovative company being in a • Corporate Governance; constant development and offering its customers the most advanced solutions and services that make every- • Sustainable Development. day life more convenient, eventful and brighter. Strategically oriented report Annual Report Preparation Standards • The report is focused at strategic vision of the The report has been prepared in accordance with the Company management, comparison of results and requirements of the legislation of the Russian Federa- key aspects of MTS business during the year to the tion and regulators’ requirements applicable to MTS, strategy; and also in accordance with the Russian and interna- tional standards and practices in the field of public • The report has increased volume and quality of annual reporting.
  • Long Distance Calling, Focusing on Usage Patterns, Market Shares, Prices, and Expenditures

    Long Distance Calling, Focusing on Usage Patterns, Market Shares, Prices, and Expenditures

    News media Information 202 / 418-0500 TTY: 202 / 418-2555 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov NEWS ftp.fcc.gov Federal Communications Commission th 445 12 Street, S.W. Washington, D. C. 20554 This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC. 515 F 2d 385 (D.C. Circ 1974). FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: May 14, 2003 Michael Balmoris 202-418-0253 Email: [email protected] FCC RELEASES STATISTICS OF THE LONG DISTANCE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY REPORT Long Distance Market Revenue Declines; Average per Minute Rate Falls to 8 Cents per Minute Washington, D.C. – The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) today released its latest report on the long distance industry, Statistics of the Long Distance Telecommunications Industry. The report provides a general overview of the U.S. long distance telecommunications industry. The report is divided into two sections. The first section contains information that describes the total long distance market, such as revenues, market shares, and number of companies. The second section shows data on residential long distance calling, focusing on usage patterns, market shares, prices, and expenditures. Highlights from the report are shown below: I. Revenue Data In 2001, the long distance market had slightly more than $99 billion in revenues, compared to $110 billion in 2000. Carriers providing long distance service (including wireless carriers) accounted for over $90 billion and local telephone companies accounted for the remaining $9 billion; compared to $101 billion for long distance carriers and $9 billion for local telephone companies in 2000.
  • ITU Operational Bulletin No. 823 – 3

    ITU Operational Bulletin No. 823 – 3

    International ITU Operational Bulletin Telecommunication Union No. 823 1.XI.2004 (Information received by 25 October 2004) Contents Page General information Lists annexed to the ITU Operational Bulletin: Note from TSB.............................................................. 2 Approval of ITU-T Recommendations................................................................................................... 3 Assignment of Signalling Area/Network Codes (SANC) (ITU-T Recommendation Q.708 (03/99)): Slovenia, United Kingdom ................................................................................................................... 3 Legal time changes: Saint Pierre and Miquelon (France Telecom, Paris) .............................................. 3 Telephone Service: Cyprus (Cyprus Telecommunications Authority (CYTA), Nicosia) .................................................. 3 Denmark (National IT and Telecom Agency (NITA), Copenhagen) ............................................... 4 Egypt (National Telecom Regulatory Authority (NTRA), Giza)....................................................... 5 Liberia (Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications (MPT), Monrovia) .......................................... 6 Niger (Société Nigérienne des Télécommunications (SONITEL), Niamey)...................................... 6 Netherlands (KPN, Royal Dutch Telecom, The Hague) .................................................................. 7 United Kingdom (Office of Communications (OFCOM), London) ................................................
  • Update on Competition in the Telecommunications Industry by Douglas Jacobson

    Update on Competition in the Telecommunications Industry by Douglas Jacobson

    REGIONAL RESOURCE The Council of State Governmentsn3355 Lenox Road, N.E., Suite 1050nAtlanta, Georgia 30326n404/266-1271 Update on Competition in the Telecommunications Industry by Douglas Jacobson February 2003 Introduction While the telecommunications industry’s reputation has been tarnished by WorldCom’s struggles, an overcrowded marketplace, and artificially high stock prices, telecom companies and state and federal regulators continue to cooperate in order to provide new services to consumers. This Regional Resource serves as an update to Telecommunications Competition in Southern States, a Special Series Report published by the Southern Legislative Conference (SLC) in January 2001. It addresses the issue of Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs), such as BellSouth, SBC Communications and Verizon, being allowed to offer long-distance telephone service in states in which they are the primary local-service carrier.1 The process of gaining approval and the effects of increased local-service and long-distance competition are being felt across the 16-state region of the SLC, in which consumers in 14 of the states now have increased competition in their long-distance and local-service markets. Furthermore, regulatory agencies and telecom companies in states in which consumers do not yet have this option currently are working on creating opportunities for more competition for consumers. Today’s telecom regime was formed by incumbent carriers (SBC and Verizon) received the Telecommunications Act of 1996. This the go-ahead in a total of seven states. Verizon, legislation requires companies which have the country’s largest service provider, scored virtual local-service monopolies to prove on the first success, winning permission to offer a state-by-state basis that they have opened long-distance service in New York in 1999.