DOCSLIB.ORG

Algerian Civil War 1989- 1999 Descend Into What Has Been Called a “Savage War”?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Algerian Civil War 1989- 1999 Descend Into What Has Been Called a “Savage War”? Why did the Algerian civil war 1989- 1999 descend into what has been called a “savage war”? Explaining the nature of the Algerian civil war Cato Stensland Master thesis, (60sp,MØNA 4590) “Midtøsten og Nord- afrikastudier” Institutt for kulturstudier og orientalske språk UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Spring 2015 © Author Cato Stensland Year 2015 Why did the Algerian civil war 1989-1999 descend into what has been called a “savage war”? Author Cato Stensland http://www.duo.uio.no/ Print: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo II Abstract This paper tries to answer some perplexing questions surrounding the Algerian civil war of the 1990‟s. The country went through a civil war that descended into a bloody chaos that few can reconcile with. It is this “decent” that is explored in the paper. By relying on a set of categories and rules for these interactions set forth in the selectorate theory the negligence of the people at large by the government is sought to be explained. Particular actions like the massacres, assassinations, bombings, killings and sabotage are put into a context that however grisly it may be portrays a rationale making sense of the violence. It discusses the rationale behind the massacres that took place from 1995 and the inaction to prevent these. To find this rational it is necessary to start the paper with a political analysis that can identify the key players and to link the political happenings as an extension of politics to acts of war. Therefore the first part of the paper is primarily concerned with the reasons behind the conflict, aligning the different parties of it and describing their primary motives. It then goes on discussing in what way their inherent structure manifested in strategies and methods applied throughout the war. What has been coined as the “Let them Rot” strategy is widely discussed in this framework that can explain a strategy that became detrimental to the regimes survival and to the misery of the population. The paper does the same for the insurgents, identifying their main strategies to clearer understand the results of the two. The main finding of the paper is that due to a weak link between the actual leadership - the army whose main concern is to stay in power - of the country and the institutional leadership - the president - of the country creates a dynamic that prompts the institutional leader whatever his intentions are to challenge the position of the actual leadership by strengthening his own position. In the case of the civil war in Algeria this happened twice, first with President Chadli and then with President Zeroual and this is unequivocally the main reason for Algeria‟s civil war and the political effects of the dynamic spurred by this weakness is the reason for the way in which the civil war was fought. III Preface This project has been hard work. The work has resulted in what you now have before you, but it has by no means been only my own. For the results herein I must thank my outstandingly patient, curly heard welsh friend Robin Philips Jones for his invaluable proof reading as well as his ever precise comments. My supervisor at the University of Oslo Brynjar Lia deserves special thanks as his comments and critiques no matter how harsh have done nothing but improve my work. I would also like to thank my good friend Lt. Rev. Ola Aasland Vold for sharing his own experiences of the writing process and how to traverse the obstacles in it, as well as his razor sharp mind. My wife Rebecca T. Stensland has been and still is the sexiest wife out there, something that has encouraged my writing every single day, thanks for all the support my love. Beirut, 24th January 2015 Cato Stensland IV V Content 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Choice of Theory ......................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Review of sources........................................................................................................ 7 2 Where did it all begin? ..................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Establishing a point of departure ............................................................................... 12 2.2 The Algerian powerhouse.......................................................................................... 14 2.2.1 Identifying the winning coalition ....................................................................... 15 2.2.2 Who were the leadership? .................................................................................. 16 2.3 How did President Chadli Challenge the status quo?................................................ 18 3 In what way did the army respond, and why?.................................................................. 22 3.1 What was the leadership‟s initial reaction? ............................................................... 24 3.2 Why did the leadership feel threatened? ................................................................... 25 3.3 A point of no return? ................................................................................................. 28 4 War, the continuation of politics ...................................................................................... 36 4.1 Who sided with whom? ............................................................................................. 38 4.2 Who made up the new winning coalition? ................................................................ 41 4.3 The divide .................................................................................................................. 44 4.3.1 What was the opposition‟s reaction to the coupe? ............................................. 44 4.3.2 Contested selectorates ........................................................................................ 45 4.3.3 What did this entail?........................................................................................... 47 5 Why the “Let them rot” strategy? .................................................................................... 51 5.1 COIN- Algerian civil war: ......................................................................................... 51 5.1.1 Capacities: .......................................................................................................... 52 5.1.2 Geographical: ..................................................................................................... 54 5.1.3 Methodical:......................................................................................................... 55 5.2 What were the origins of the hard-line stance? ......................................................... 59 5.3 How did the FIS go about making their coalition the winning coalition? ................. 62 5.4 How did the army respond in force and why?........................................................... 64 5.4.1 Was there a logical rational behind the tactics deployed by the army? ............. 68 5.5 Retaining the divide in two parts ............................................................................... 71 6 The Wild Card, how it came to be and what part it played.............................................. 74 VI 6.1 What were the consequences of the “Let them rot” strategy? ................................... 75 6.1.1 What were the goals and actions of GIA in the theatre? .................................... 77 6.2 In what way were the GIA relevant with this perspective on the civil war? ............. 82 7 The descent into a “Savage War”..................................................................................... 85 7.1 Why the proliferation of violence? ............................................................................ 85 7.2 Two reasons for escalating violence in the abandoned areas .................................... 90 7.3 What can the massacres tell us? ................................................................................ 93 8 The money game, a matter of priorities?.......................................................................... 99 8.1 What‟s the importance of private goods? ................................................................ 100 8.2 How did the leadership overcome a shrinking resources pool? .............................. 102 8.2.1 How did they utilize the influx of goods available from 1994?....................... 105 8.2.2 How was the army in a position to ignore the Sant Egidio meeting? .............. 106 9 Did the sway on power hold? ......................................................................................... 107 9.1 How did Zeroual challenge the army?..................................................................... 107 9.2 What were the motivations behind the civil defence groups? ................................. 112 9.3 How did the army respond to the threat President Zeroual had become? ............... 115 9.4 Was there an end to it all? ....................................................................................... 117 10 Conclusion:..................................................................................................................... 120 Literature ................................................................................................................................ 123 VII 1 Introduction The topic I have chosen to approach in this question concerns Algeria, a north-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MDE 28/08/93 Distr: UA/SC UA 174/93
    EXTERNAL (for general distribution) AI Index: MDE 28/08/93 Distr: UA/SC UA 174/93 Death Penalty 27 May 1993 ALGERIA: 41 people sentenced to death: Abderrahim Hocine Rachid Hechaichi Karim Fennour Jamal Chikou Belkacem Tahri Jamal Laskri Mabrouk Bakour Ahmed Dahmoun Meliani Mansouri Youcef Boulesbaa Redha Boucherif Said Soussan (sentenced to death twice) Mohamed Aimet (sentenced to death twice) and 28 in absentia Amnesty International is gravely concerned that 41 people were sentenced to death on 26 May 1993 by the special court in Algiers in two separate trials. Thirty-eight of those sentenced to death (26 in absentia) were accused of participating in the bombing of Algiers airport on 26 August 1992, in which nine people died and over 120 were injured. Said Soussan and Mohamed Aimet, who were among the 38 sentenced to death in the first trial, and three others (two in absentia) were accused of terrorist attacks, including planting a bomb in the television station in June 1992. Following the bombing of the airport, six individuals were arrested and the confessions of some of them were shown on Algerian television. There were allegations that the confessions had been extracted under torture. These individuals have no right of appeal, but may seek a review by "cassation" by the Supreme Court; if successful the case will be retried by another special court. Cassation rules only on procedures, and does not reexamine facts, thus failing to safeguard the detainees' right of appeal. Once the death sentences have been upheld by the Supreme Court, executions may not be carried out until a plea for clemency has been presented to the President and refused.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    ALGERIA: ADVERSARIES IN SEARCH OF UNCERTAIN COMPROMISES Rémy Leveau September 1992 © Institute for Security Studies of WEU 1996. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo-copying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the Institute for Security Studies of WEU. ISSN 1017-7566 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Introduction The context of coup d'état The forces involved in the crisis Questions and scenarios Postscript PREFACE Earlier this year the Institute asked Professor Rémy Leveau to prepare a study on `Algeria: adversaries in search of uncertain compromises.' This was discussed at a meeting of specialists on North African politics held in the Institute. In view of the continuing importance of developments in Algeria the Institute asked Professor Leveau to prepare this revised version of his paper for wider circulation. We are very grateful to Professor Leveau for having prepared this stimulating and enlightening analysis of developments which are also of importance to Algeria's European neighbours. We are also grateful to those who took part in the discussion of earlier drafts of this paper. John Roper Paris, September 1992 - v - Algeria: adversaries in search of uncertain compromises Rémy Leveau INTRODUCTION The perception of Islamic movements has been marked in Europe since 1979 by images of the Iranian revolution: hostages in the American Embassy, support for international terrorism, incidents at the mosque in Mecca and the Salman Rushdie affair. The dominant rhetoric of the FIS (Islamic Salvation Front) in Algeria, which has since 1989 presented a similar image of rejection of internal state order and of the international system, strengthens the feeling of an identity of aims and of a bloc of hostile attitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Boko Haram Beyond the Headlines: Analyses of Africa’S Enduring Insurgency
    Boko Haram Beyond the Headlines: Analyses of Africa’s Enduring Insurgency Editor: Jacob Zenn Boko Haram Beyond the Headlines: Analyses of Africa’s Enduring Insurgency Jacob Zenn (Editor) Abdulbasit Kassim Elizabeth Pearson Atta Barkindo Idayat Hassan Zacharias Pieri Omar Mahmoud Combating Terrorism Center at West Point United States Military Academy www.ctc.usma.edu The views expressed in this report are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of the Combating Terrorism Center, United States Military Academy, Department of Defense, or U.S. Government. May 2018 Cover Photo: A group of Boko Haram fighters line up in this still taken from a propaganda video dated March 31, 2016. COMBATING TERRORISM CENTER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Director The editor thanks colleagues at the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point (CTC), all of whom supported this endeavor by proposing the idea to carry out a LTC Bryan Price, Ph.D. report on Boko Haram and working with the editor and contributors to see the Deputy Director project to its rightful end. In this regard, I thank especially Brian Dodwell, Dan- iel Milton, Jason Warner, Kristina Hummel, and Larisa Baste, who all directly Brian Dodwell collaborated on the report. I also thank the two peer reviewers, Brandon Kend- hammer and Matthew Page, for their input and valuable feedback without which Research Director we could not have completed this project up to such a high standard. There were Dr. Daniel Milton numerous other leaders and experts at the CTC who assisted with this project behind-the-scenes, and I thank them, too. Distinguished Chair Most importantly, we would like to dedicate this volume to all those whose lives LTG (Ret) Dell Dailey have been afected by conflict and to those who have devoted their lives to seeking Class of 1987 Senior Fellow peace and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Representing the Algerian Civil War: Literature, History, and the State
    Representing the Algerian Civil War: Literature, History, and the State By Neil Grant Landers A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in French in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor Debarati Sanyal, Co-Chair Professor Soraya Tlatli, Co-Chair Professor Karl Britto Professor Stefania Pandolfo Fall 2013 1 Abstract of the Dissertation Representing the Algerian Civil War: Literature, History, and the State by Neil Grant Landers Doctor of Philosophy in French Literature University of California, Berkeley Professor Debarati Sanyal, Co-Chair Professor Soraya Tlatli, Co-Chair Representing the Algerian Civil War: Literature, History, and the State addresses the way the Algerian civil war has been portrayed in 1990s novelistic literature. In the words of one literary critic, "The Algerian war has been, in a sense, one big murder mystery."1 This may be true, but literary accounts portray the "mystery" of the civil war—and propose to solve it—in sharply divergent ways. The primary aim of this study is to examine how three of the most celebrated 1990s novels depict—organize, analyze, interpret, and "solve"—the civil war. I analyze and interpret these novels—by Assia Djebar, Yasmina Khadra, and Boualem Sansal—through a deep contextualization, both in terms of Algerian history and in the novels' contemporary setting. This is particularly important in this case, since the civil war is so contested, and is poorly understood. Using the novels' thematic content as a cue for deeper understanding, I engage through them and with them a number of elements crucial to understanding the civil war: Algeria's troubled nationalist legacy; its stagnant one-party regime; a fear, distrust, and poor understanding of the Islamist movement and the insurgency that erupted in 1992; and the unending, horrifically bloody violence that piled on throughout the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics of the Democratic Process in Legal Politics in Indonesia and Egypt
    JURNAL CITA HUKUM (Indonesian Law Journal) FSH UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020), pp. 627-654, DOI: 10.15408/jch.v8i3.17071 The Dynamics of The Democratic Process In Legal Politics In Indonesia and Egypt Nahrowi1, Masyrofah2, Nurul Handayani3 Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta Indonesia 10.15408/jch.v8i3.17071 Abstract The implementation of democratic systems in several Muslim countries has obstacles. This is due to the development of people's thinking patterns about understanding democracy itself. Islam as a religion emphasizes the establishment of harmonious relations, but when applying the relationship of Islam and democracy in the life of the state does not necessarily be smooth at the level of practice. But on the other hand, It faced with the reality of the problems in implementing democratization in the Islamic world. Some countries claimed to succeed as democratic countries, generally after going through a transition period of transfer of government power. But on the contrary, not a few countries that have not or are not ready to accept change as a process of democratization are trapped in the struggle for power and lead to conflict and violence. Therefore it is important to discuss the challenges and obstacles of democratization in the Islamic world. With a normative-empirical approach, this article aims to analyze the problems of the democratization process in two Muslim countries, namely Indonesia and Egypt. This study found that the process of democratization as a part of the legal-political system in Muslim countries must adapt to the culture and political conditions of each country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Left and the Algerian Catastrophe
    THE LEFT AND THE ALGERIAN CATASTROPHE H UGH R OBERTS n explaining their sharply opposed positions following the attacks on the IWorld Trade Center and the Pentagon on 11 September 2001, two promi- nent writers on the American Left, Christopher Hitchens and Noam Chomsky, both found it convenient to refer to the Algerian case. Since, for Hitchens, the attacks had been the work of an Islamic fundamentalism that was a kind of fascism, he naturally saw the Algerian drama in similar terms: Civil society in Algeria is barely breathing after the fundamentalist assault …We let the Algerians fight the Islamic-fascist wave without saying a word or lending a hand.1 This comment was probably music to the ears of the Algerian government, which had moved promptly to get on board the US-led ‘coalition’ against terror, as Chomsky noted in articulating his very different view of things: Algeria, which is one of the most murderous states in the world, would love to have US support for its torture and massacres of people in Algeria.2 This reading of the current situation was later supplemented by an account of its genesis: The Algerian government is in office because it blocked the democratic election in which it would have lost to mainly Islamic-based groups. That set off the current fighting.3 The significance of these remarks is that they testify to the fact that the Western Left has not addressed the Algerian drama properly, so that Hitchens and Chomsky, neither of whom pretend to specialist knowledge of the country, have THE LEFT AND THE ALGERIAN CATASTROPHE 153 not had available to them a fund of reliable analysis on which they might draw.
    [Show full text]
  • Jihadism in Africa Local Causes, Regional Expansion, International Alliances
    SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber (Eds.) Jihadism in Africa Local Causes, Regional Expansion, International Alliances RP 5 June 2015 Berlin All rights reserved. © Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2015 SWP Research Papers are peer reviewed by senior researchers and the execu- tive board of the Institute. They express exclusively the personal views of the authors. SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Ludwigkirchplatz 3­4 10719 Berlin Germany Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] ISSN 1863-1053 Translation by Meredith Dale (Updated English version of SWP-Studie 7/2015) Table of Contents 5 Problems and Recommendations 7 Jihadism in Africa: An Introduction Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber 13 Al-Shabaab: Youth without God Annette Weber 31 Libya: A Jihadist Growth Market Wolfram Lacher 51 Going “Glocal”: Jihadism in Algeria and Tunisia Isabelle Werenfels 69 Spreading Local Roots: AQIM and Its Offshoots in the Sahara Wolfram Lacher and Guido Steinberg 85 Boko Haram: Threat to Nigeria and Its Northern Neighbours Moritz Hütte, Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber 99 Conclusions and Recommendations Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber 103 Appendix 103 Abbreviations 104 The Authors Problems and Recommendations Jihadism in Africa: Local Causes, Regional Expansion, International Alliances The transnational terrorism of the twenty-first century feeds on local and regional conflicts, without which most terrorist groups would never have appeared in the first place. That is the case in Afghanistan and Pakistan, Syria and Iraq, as well as in North and West Africa and the Horn of Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Algerian Armed Forces: National and International Challenges
    THE ALGERIAN ARMED FORCES: NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL CHALLENGES Carlos Echeverría Jesús Working Paper (WP) Nº 8/2004 1/4/2004 Area: Mediterranean & Arab World / Defence & Security – WP Nº 8/2004 (Trans. Spanish) 1/4/2004 The Algerian Armed Forces: National and international challenges ∗ Carlos Echeverría Jesús THE ROLE OF THE ARMED FORCES: FROM INDEPENDENCE TO THE FIRST STEPS TOWARD DEMOCRACY (1962-1988) The Algerian Armed Forces arose from the National Liberation Army (ALN), particularly from the so-called ‘border army’ which, as General Jaled Nezzar recalls in his Memoirs, began to play a dominant role under the command of Colonel Houari Boumedienne in late 1959: this army relentlessly waged war on the French forces deployed on the borders of Morocco and Tunisia until the conflict ended in 1962 (1). Although the creation of the ALN itself dates back to 1954, it was not until the Summam Congress, on August 20, 1956, that its structure was determined and it became considered an instrument for implementing the policies developed by the party: the National Liberation Front (FLN). The internal struggles within the FLN-ALN tandem, both in and outside Algeria, have been described by many authors: both the confrontations within the National Council of the Algerian Revolution (CNRA) and those at the various FLN congresses during and immediately after the war –the Summam Congress (1956), Tripoli Congress (1962) and Algiers Congress (1964)– aimed at taking control of the embryo of the future Armed Forces. According to Mohamed Harbi, the session of the CNRA held in December 1959 – January 1960 was crucial, as it abolished the Ministry of the Armed Forces, replacing it with an Inter-Ministerial War Committee (CIG), directed by military officers of a General Chiefs of Staff (EMG) led by Boumedienne, who went on to become Defense Minister of the first independent government and, starting in June 1965, President until his death in 1978.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport Alternatif Aux Troisième Et Quatrième Rapports Du
    Rapport alternatif aux troisième et quatrième rapports du gouvernement algérien sur l’application du Pacte international relatif aux droits économiques, sociaux et culturels 4 avril 2010 Présenté conjointement par : — Syndicat national autonome des personnels de l’administration publique (SNAPAP) 23 Rue Boualem Zeriat Belfort, Harrach Alger, Algérie Email : [email protected] ‐ Tel/Fax : +213 21 52 03 72 — Comité international de soutien au Syndicalisme Autonome Algérien (CISA) 21 ter rue Voltaire – 75011 Paris – France Email : [email protected] – Tél : +33 6 29 64 66 33 — Institut Hoggar Case Postale 305, CH‐1211 Genève 21, Suisse Email : [email protected] – Tél : +41 22 734 15 03 Introduction Ceci est un rapport alternatif aux troisième et quatrième rapports du gouvernement algérien sur l’application du Pacte international relatif aux droits économiques, sociaux et culturels. La structure de ce rapport suit la liste des questions (List of issues) établie dans le Rapport du Groupe de travail pré‐session du Comité sur les droits économiques, sociaux et culturels « E/C.12/DZA/Q/4 »1 daté du 27 mai 2009. Chaque section correspond à une ou deux questions. Onze thèmes ont été abordés comme le montre le tableau suivant. Section Thème Question 1 Commission nationale consultative de promotion et de protection Q3 des droits de l’homme 2 Extraction de ressources naturelles Q4 3 Corruption Q7 4 Personnes déplacées à l’intérieur du pays Q8 et Q11 5 Etat d’urgence Q18 6 Chômage Q19 7 Salaire minimum Q22 8 Droit de grève et autonomie des syndicats Q24 et Q25 9 Logement Q31 et Q32 10 Problèmes qui se posent en matière de services de santé Q36 11 Qualité de l’enseignement Q39 et Q40 A la fin du rapport des recommandations sont faites au Comité au sujet des onze thèmes abordés.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution in the French-Algerian War (1954-1962): Historical Analogy and the Limits of French Historical Reason
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2016 The French Revolution in the French-Algerian War (1954-1962): Historical Analogy and the Limits of French Historical Reason Timothy Scott Johnson The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1424 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THE FRENCH REVOLUTION IN THE FRENCH-ALGERIAN WAR (1954-1962): HISTORICAL ANALOGY AND THE LIMITS OF FRENCH HISTORICAL REASON By Timothy Scott Johnson A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 TIMOTHY SCOTT JOHNSON All Rights Reserved ii The French Revolution in the French-Algerian War (1954-1962): Historical Analogy and the Limits of French Historical Reason by Timothy Scott Johnson This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Richard Wolin, Distinguished Professor of History, The Graduate Center, CUNY _______________________ _______________________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee _______________________
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Entitled a Framework for the Study of the Spread of English In
    A Thesis entitled A Framework for the Study of the Spread of English in Algeria: A Peaceful Transition to a Better Linguistic Environment by Kamal Belmihoub Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in English as a Second Language _________________________________________ Melinda Reichelt, PhD, Committee Chair _________________________________________ Mohamed Benrabah, PhD, Committee Member _________________________________________ Ruth A. Hottell, PhD, Committee Member _________________________________________ Patricia R. Komuniecki, PhD, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2012 Copyright 2012, Kamal Belmihoub This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of A Framework for the Study of the Spread of English in Algeria: A Peaceful Transition to a Better Linguistic Environment by Kamal Belmihoub Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in English as a Second Language The University of Toledo May 2012 The first chapter of this thesis provides an overview of Algeria‟s history of linguistic diversity. The same chapter describes the language policy of Arabization, which has dominated Algeria‟s linguistic situation since independence from France in 1962. In the second chapter, this thesis presents a theoretical framework for the study of the spread of English in Algeria, where this language has been making inroads. It is argued that English should play a positive role in promoting a peaceful linguistic environment in the North African country. In the third and final chapter, the above- mentioned framework is applied to Algeria‟s context, analyzing this environment through the lenses of the theoretical considerations suggested by the framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Spoiling in Algeria and the Collapse of the FIS an Analysis of Algeria's Spoiler Problem 1994-1995
    Spoiling in Algeria and the Collapse of the FIS: An Analysis of Algeria’s Spoiler Problem, 1994-1995 The Algerian Civil War has cemented itself as a significant case study because of not only the longevity of its conflict (approximately ten years) or because of its violent and often brutal nature (over 150,000 casualties), but because of the significant spoiler problem that occurred within Algeria’s peacebuilding initiatives. These peacebuilding initiatives between 1994 and 1995 represented the most significant period of mutual dialogue between the Algerian regime and the Islamist rebel groups. There have been two common assumptions about the Algerian Civil War. The first is that the conflict is often defined by the Islamist challenge, meaning that the various armed Islamist actors have often been construed as “spoilers” to the peacebuilding measures. They are construed to value their radical ideologies over pragmatic considerations and utilize violence and terror as weapons. The other is that the Algerian Civil War consisted of primarily two sides, one the armed Islamist camp, and the other the government camp. Both of these assumptions are wrong. An analysis of Algeria’s civil war spoilers between 1994 and 1995 uncovers who spoiled these peace initiatives and why these spoilers emerged. This chapter functions as a targeted case study bound in both time and space, to focus not only on the Algerian Civil War (1991-2003), but also more specifically on the peacebuilding initiatives and spoiling behavior during the first two years of the reign of Algerian President Liamine Zéroual (1994-1995). The analysis of this conflict will use three peacebuilding initiatives as vessels to study Algeria’s spoilers.
    [Show full text]