DOCSLIB.ORG

Catchment Evidence Summary Old Bedford Including the Middle Level January 2014 Old Bedford Including the Middle Level Management Catchment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Catchment Evidence Summary Old Bedford Including the Middle Level January 2014 Old Bedford Including the Middle Level Management Catchment Unclassified Catchment Evidence Summary Old Bedford including the Middle Level January 2014 Old Bedford including the Middle Level Management Catchment The Old Bedford including the Middle Level Catchment is one of Defra’s 100 Water Framework Directive (WFD) Management Catchments within England and Wales. This map shows the first River Basin Management Plan Waterbody names with correct or locally ‘known as names’ in brackets. We are the Environment Agency. It's our job to look after your environment and make it a better place - for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency, out there, making your environment a better place. Contact address for queries regarding this document: Michael Nunns (Catchment Delivery Manager) Teresa Brown (Catchment Co-ordinator) Environment Agency Bromholme Lane Brampton Huntingdon Cambridgeshire PE28 4NE Email: [email protected] © Environment Agency 2014 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Environment Agency Catchment Evidence – Old Bedford including the Middle Level, Jan 2014. Unclassified 2 Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 4 1.1 Purpose and scope of the document ....................................................................... 4 1.2 What is Water Framework Directive? ...................................................................... 4 1.3 Baseline from the first River Basin Management Plan.................................................5 Map 1 Status of the waterbodies in the first River Basin Management Plan, December 2009 showing the ecological classification and morphology designation by waterbody area, name and number (ID) ......................................................................................... 5 Map 2 Canal waterbodies as linear features over the other waterbody areas..................9 Map 3 Baseline (2009) WFD Classification Monitoring Points.........................................10 1.4 Pressures and Reason for Failure..............................................................................19 Map 4 Pressures and reason for failure in the Old Bedford including the Middle Level…………...................................................................................................................19 2 Catchment issues and potential actions ............................................ .23 2.1 Water quality .................................................................................. .......................23 2.2 Water resources.................................................................................................... 28 2.3 Ecology ................................................................................................................. 29 2.4 Groundwater ......................................................................................................... 32 2.5 Morphology – river function and form .................................................................... 32 Map 5 The main watercourses within each waterbody and the organisation managing flood risk ..................................................................................................................... 33 3 Protected areas ...................................................................................... 36 3.1 Drinking Water Protected Areas.................................................................................36 3.2 Nutrient Sensitive Areas.............................................................................................37 Map 6 Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in the catchment ...................................................... 37 3.3 Habitat and Species Protected Areas..................................................................... 38 Map 7 Water dependant Natura 2000 sites in the catchment ...................................... 38 Map 8 Freshwater Fish Protected areas in the catchment .......................................... 39 3.4 Bathing Water Protection Areas in the catchment.....................................................39 4 Integrated catchment management ...................................................... 39 4.1 Biodiversity Action Plans..............................................................................................40 4.2 Flood Risk Management..............................................................................................40 5 Looking forward to the next Anglian river basin management plan . 40 Map 9 Future waterbody boundary changes ............................................................... 41 Map10 Second, cycle 2 Classification Monitoring Points...............................................42 Environment Agency Catchment Evidence – Old Bedford including the Middle Level, Jan 2014. Unclassified 3 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Scope of the document This Catchment Evidence report is a summary of available Water Framework Directive (WFD) Evidence for waterbodies in the Old Bedford including the Middle Level (OBML) management catchment. This document can be used in discussions about the issues and projects that will contribute towards delivering overall good status. The 2009 baseline dataset was reported to the European Union (EU), and therefore sets the benchmark against which we need to assess improvements (Map 1 and Table1). This was published in the first River Basin Management Plan (RBMP). The Environment Agency has an investigations programme which is designed to look at the failing elements with the aim of improving our confidence that they are genuinely failing and to identify the main causes of the failures. The majority of our investigations programme was completed by December 2012, however the programme is an ongoing process and as new investigations are completed, we will share the outcomes with others. These investigations help us understand the actions that need to be carried out to improve the status of the waterbodies within the OBML Management Catchment. As well as the direct Water Framework Directive issues that need to be addressed, we also need to consider the issues associated with the Protected Areas such as the Drinking Water Protected Areas and Freshwater Fish Directive stretches. 1.2 What is WFD (Water Framework Directive)? WFD is an EU directive which became law in England in 2000. WFD requires ‘overall good status’ for each of the two types of waterbodies, groundwater and surfacewater, by 2021. Aims and objectives of WFD are to: achieve the overall ‘good’ status of waters prevent deterioration and enhance the quality of the Water Environment promote the sustainable use of water reduce contamination mitigate against the impacts of floods and droughts create better habitats for people and wildlife Environment Agency Catchment Evidence – Old Bedford including the Middle Level, Jan 2014. Unclassified 4 1.3 Baseline from the first River Basin Management Plan Map 1. Status of the waterbodies in the first River Basin Management Plan, December 2009 showing the ecological classification and morphology designation by waterbody area, name and number Environment Agency Catchment Evidence – Old Bedford including the Middle Level, Jan 2014. Unclassified 5 Table 1. Baseline (2009) overall WFD status of the rivers and tributaries from the first River Basin Management Plan phytes Waterbody ID and Status/Potential HeavilyModified Water Body Morphology (supporting element) Hydrology (supporting element) Diatoms Invertebrates Macro Fish Phosphorus Ammonia Dissolved Oxygen pH Temp Classification Method WaterbodyGroup ID Name Ecological GB105033043140 Supports High Lode (Bury Moderate Yes Moderate Good Poor Good Poor High High Calculated Good Brook) GB105033042880 Moderate Yes Bad Good Bad Good Moderate High High Calculated Cranbrook Drain GB105033047922 Moderate Yes Good High Poor High Poor High Good Calculated Counter Drain GB105033043170 Supports Supports Good No High High Good Good High High Good Calculated New Dyke Good Good GB105033043130 Supports Moderate Yes High Good Moderate High Bad High Good Calculated Great Raveley Drain Good GB105033043200 Supports Does not Old Course River Good No Good High Good Good Good High Good Calculated Good support good Nene GB105033047711 Supports Moderate Yes Good Moderate High Moderate High Good Calculated Floods Drain Good GB105033047690 Bevills Leam (inc. Whittlesey Dyke) GB105033043180 Forty Foot (inc. Ash Drain) GB105033042890 Good Yes Crooked Drain GB105033043150 Does not Moderate Yes Good High Moderate Poor Bad High High Calculated Twenty Foot Drain support good GB105033043160 Supports Moderate Yes Poor Moderate Poor Bad High High Calculated Forty Foot Drain Good GB105033042910 Forty Foot (west of Welchs Dam) GB105033047700 Does not Moderate Yes High Good Good Good Moderate High Good Calculated Well Creek support good Environment Agency Catchment Evidence – Old Bedford including the Middle Level, Jan 2014. Unclassified 6 phytes Waterbody ID and Status/Potential HeavilyModified Water Body Morphology (supporting element) Hydrology (supporting element) Diatoms Invertebrates Macro Fish Phosphorus Ammonia Dissolved Oxygen pH Temp Classification Method WaterbodyGroup ID Name Ecological GB105033047712 Supports Mode Moderate Yes High
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oosthuizen, MSR, DB Fenland, 30 Jan 2015
    RE-EVALUATING MAPS OF DOMESDAY POPULATION DENSITIES: A case study from the Cambridgeshire fenland By SUSAN OOSTHUIZEN Abstract Professor Sir Clifford Darby’s county, regional and national maps of a range of data drawn from the Domesday Book revolutionized scholarship on the social and economic history of late Anglo-Saxon England (e.g. 1935, 1936a, 1936b, 1971, 1977). While this paper does not seek to challenge Darby’s general conclusions, a case study re-examination of the inter-relationship between population density and physical geography in the Cambridgeshire fenland in 1086 suggests the regional usefulness of methodological adjustments to his mapping. It indicates that the population density of the peat and silt fens in the late eleventh century may have been significantly higher than that shown in Darby’s original maps, with implications for the contemporary social and economic history of eastern England. Introduction The magnificence of many fenland churches allows even a complete stranger to infer the large numbers of inhabitants in and general prosperity of the region during the middle ages (Illustration 1, Figure 1). Its affluence is confirmed in the lay subsidies of 1327, 1332 and 1334. Settlements on the silt fens (for which there is the most information) were so prosperous that they generated among the highest returns per square mile and per vill in England, as well as some of the highest rates per taxpayer (Campbell and Bartley 2006: Maps 18.3, 18.13). Although only 20% of English settlements paid more than £225 in 1334, that select group includes not only Ely (paying £358), Leverington (paying £360), and Wisbech (paying £410) but almost every other silt fen vill (Glasscock 1973: 181-3; 1975: 28, 107, 168-9).
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Character Assessment
    OUSE WASHES Landscape Character Assessment Kite aerial photography by Bill Blake Heritage Documentation THE OUSE WASHES CONTENTS 04 Introduction Annexes 05 Context Landscape character areas mapping at 06 Study area 1:25,000 08 Structure of the report Note: this is provided as a separate document 09 ‘Fen islands’ and roddons Evolution of the landscape adjacent to the Ouse Washes 010 Physical influences 020 Human influences 033 Biodiversity 035 Landscape change 040 Guidance for managing landscape change 047 Landscape character The pattern of arable fields, 048 Overview of landscape character types shelterbelts and dykes has a and landscape character areas striking geometry 052 Landscape character areas 053 i Denver 059 ii Nordelph to 10 Mile Bank 067 iii Old Croft River 076 iv. Pymoor 082 v Manea to Langwood Fen 089 vi Fen Isles 098 vii Meadland to Lower Delphs Reeds, wet meadows and wetlands at the Welney 105 viii Ouse Valley Wetlands Wildlife Trust Reserve 116 ix Ouse Washes 03 THE OUSE WASHES INTRODUCTION Introduction Context Sets the scene Objectives Purpose of the study Study area Rationale for the Landscape Partnership area boundary A unique archaeological landscape Structure of the report Kite aerial photography by Bill Blake Heritage Documentation THE OUSE WASHES INTRODUCTION Introduction Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Context Ouse Washes LP boundary Wisbech County boundary This landscape character assessment (LCA) was District boundary A Road commissioned in 2013 by Cambridgeshire ACRE Downham as part of the suite of documents required for B Road Market a Landscape Partnership (LP) Heritage Lottery Railway Nordelph Fund bid entitled ‘Ouse Washes: The Heart of River Denver the Fens.’ However, it is intended to be a stand- Water bodies alone report which describes the distinctive March Hilgay character of this part of the Fen Basin that Lincolnshire Whittlesea contains the Ouse Washes and supports the South Holland District Welney positive management of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive Modelling of Spatial Biodiversity Data to Support Ecological Network Mapping: a Case Study in the Fens
    Predictive modelling of spatial biodiversity data to support ecological network mapping: a case study in the Fens Christopher J Panter, Paul M Dolman, Hannah L Mossman Final Report: July 2013 Supported and steered by the Fens for the Future partnership and the Environment Agency www.fensforthefuture.org.uk Published by: School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK Suggested citation: Panter C.J., Dolman P.M., Mossman, H.L (2013) Predictive modelling of spatial biodiversity data to support ecological network mapping: a case study in the Fens. University of East Anglia, Norwich. ISBN: 978-0-9567812-3-9 © Copyright rests with the authors. Acknowledgements This project was supported and steered by the Fens for the Future partnership. Funding was provided by the Environment Agency (Dominic Coath). We thank all of the species recorders and natural historians, without whom this work would not be possible. Cover picture: Extract of a map showing the predicted distribution of biodiversity. Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 6 Biological data ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Supplementary
    East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Supplementary Planning Document June 2010 © THE WILDLIFE TRUST FOR BEDFORDSHIRE, CAMBRIDGESHIRE, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE & PETERBOROUGH LTD and EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL All rights reserved. No part of the text of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any type of retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, photocopying, mechanical, recording or otherwise) without the permission of the copyright owners All mapping is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Cambridgeshire County Council 100023205 (2005). EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNTY WILDLIFE STIES REGISTER CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 METHODOLOGY 2 2.1 Field Survey 2 2.2 Assessment of Sites 3 2.3 Output Format 3 3 RESULTS 4 3.1 Statistics 4 COUNTY WILDLIFE SITES REGISTER ANNEXE Criteria for the Selection of County Wildlife Sites Version 5 (2009). CONTENTS PAGE EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL COUNTY WILDLIFE SITES SPD 1 Introduction 1.1 The East Cambridgeshire District Council (ECDC) County Wildlife Sites Supplementary Planning Document has been produced to update the East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Register 2005 so that it can be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) to the East Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework (LDF). 1.2 On the 20th October 2009 East Cambridgeshire District Council adopted its Core Strategy Development Plan Document as part of its LDF. The adoption of the Core Strategy means that most of the policies in the East Cambridgeshire District Local Plan 2000 have been superceded.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy
    Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy Page 1 of 176 June 2011 Contributors The Strategy has been shaped and informed by many partners including: The Green Infrastructure Forum Anglian Water Cambridge City Council Cambridge Past, Present and Future (formerly Cambridge Preservation Society) Cambridge Sports Lake Trust Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Biodiversity Partnership Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Environmental Record Centre Cambridgeshire County Council Cambridgeshire Horizons East Cambridgeshire District Council East of England Development Agency (EEDA) English Heritage The Environment Agency Fenland District Council Forestry Commission Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group GO-East Huntingdonshire District Council Natural England NHS Cambridgeshire Peterborough Environment City Trust Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) South Cambridgeshire District Council The National Trust The Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire & Peterborough The Woodland Trust Project Group To manage the review and report to the Green Infrastructure Forum. Cambridge City Council Cambridgeshire County Council Cambridgeshire Horizons East Cambridgeshire District Council Environment Agency Fenland District Council Huntingdonshire District Council Natural England South Cambridgeshire District Council The Wildlife Trust Consultants: LDA Design Page 2 of 176 Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................11 2 Background
    [Show full text]
  • The Ouse Washes
    NRA Anglii j i t - u THE OUSE WASHES “The Ouse Washes offer a rich variety of experiences both as an internationally important wildlife site and its continuing role of protecting the fens from flooding. ” O wildlife RSPB NRA National Rivers Authority Anglian Region THE ANGLIAN REGION The Anglian Region hosts a rich variety of wildlife habitats, flora and landscapes associated with its streams, rivers, ponds, lakes, wetlands, estuaries and coastal waters. Many of these are protected by statutory designations, for example, 75% of the coastline is covered by a conservation and/or landscape designation. Five Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty fall either partially or wholly within Anglian Region, along with England's newest National Park - the Broads. A fifth of England and Wales internationally important wetlands, from large estuaries such as the Humber and the Wash, to Ouse Washes in flood washlands such as the Ouse Washes, occur within this region. THE OUSE WASHES - FLOOD DEFENCE IMPORTANCE The Middle and South Level Barrier Banks contain Bedford Ouse flood flows within the Ouse Washes and are therefore vital for the flood protection of the Cambridgeshire Fens. Complete towns, villages and isolated dwellings, Flood waters are able to flow throigh \ together with approximately 29,000 the Hundred Foot River when pean " hectatres of agricultural land are protected from flooding by the Ouse When the peak flood has passed, i Washes Defences. Washes and back into the Old Failure of the South Level Barrier Bank would cause over 230 residential properties to be flooded to depths of up to 1.8m. As much as 11,000 hectares of Flooded washland and ditches agricultural land would be flooded.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacancy Pack
    Vacancy pack Dear Applicant Contract Stock Person Vacancies 2 roles at Ouse Washes and 2 roles at Nene Washes Salary range £15,000 to £16,000 Thank you for your interest in our advertised vacancy. In this pack you will find information about the RSPB, together with a job description, person specification and other background information about the Ouse Washes and Nene Washes. If you require any further information about this post please contact either [email protected] 01354 680212 (Ouse Washes) or [email protected] 01733 205140 (Nene Washes). We advise that you refer to the person specification when completing the application form and clearly describe how you meet each of the criteria that have been identified as being necessary for this post as this will form the basis of shortlisting candidates. If you enclose a CV, it may be referred to for supplementary information, however, please ensure that all the questions asked on the application form are fully answered. We will confirm your eligibility to work in the UK prior to appointment. Completed forms should be returned to Sally Jones, Administrator, RSPB Ouse Washes, Welches Dam, Manea, Cambs, PE15 0NF. Please check the postage required on your application as incorrect postage may lead to your application being delayed and missing the closing date. If you require an acknowledgement of receipt of your application, please enclose a stamped, addressed envelope. Alternatively, you can email your application to [email protected] The closing date for receipt of completed application forms is Thursday 26th February 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Council Regulation (EC)
    17.11.2012 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 353/9 OTHER ACTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2012/C 353/07) This publication confers the right to object to the application pursuant to Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 ( 1). Statements of objection must reach the Commission within six months from the date of this publication. SINGLE DOCUMENT COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 510/2006 ‘FENLAND CELERY’ EC No: UK-PGI-0005-0887-22.08.2011 PGI ( X ) PDO ( ) 1. Name: ‘Fenland Celery’ 2. Member State or Third Country: United Kingdom 3. Description of the agricultural product or foodstuff: 3.1. Type of product: Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed 3.2. Description of product to which the name in point 1 applies: ‘Fenland Celery’ (Apium graveolens) is the name given to celery which has been planted, grown and harvested using traditional methods on the Adventurers 1 and 2 type deep peat soils in specific parts of Cambridgeshire, Suffolk and Norfolk. The method by which ‘Fenland Celery’ is grown, and the varieties that are used, result in a product with notable characteristics, these are: Appearance — ‘Fenland Celery’ has a wide butt which ranges from 8-12 cm in diameter, and splayed sticks (or petioles). It is deeper in shape with a pronounced root. ‘Fenland Celery’ grows between 60 cm and 80 cm in length from the butt to top of the leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglian River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B – Sub Areas in the Anglian River Basin District
    Anglian River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B – Sub Areas in the Anglian River Basin District March 2016 1 of 161 Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] Or the Environment Agency’s National www.gov.uk/environment-agency Customer Contact Centre: T: 03708 506506 © Environment Agency 2016 Email: [email protected]. All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 of 161 Contents Glossary and abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 The layout of this document ........................................................................................................ 7 1. Sub-areas in the Anglian River Basin District ...................................................................... 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 9 Flood Risk Areas ........................................................................................................................ 10 Management Catchments ........................................................................................................... 10 2. Conclusions, objectives and measures to manage risk in the South Essex
    [Show full text]
  • Boston to Peterborough Wetland Corridor Business Case
    Boston to Peterborough Wetland Corridor Business Case On behalf of Lincolnshire County Council in partnership with The Inland Waterways Association & The Environment Agency Project Ref: 48170 | Rev: V4 | Date: November 2020 Registered Office: Buckingham Court Kingsmead Business Park, London Road, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, HP11 1JU Office Address: 5th Floor, Lomond House, 9 George Square, Glasgow, G2 1DY Business Case Boston to Peterborough Wetland Corridor Document Control Sheet Project Name: Boston to Peterborough Wetland Corridor Project Ref: 48170 Report Title: Business Case Doc Ref: Final Date: November 2020 Name Position Signature Date Emma Brown Economist Prepared by: Taylor Klinefelter Economist EB, TK, SF 13/11/20 Steven Findlay Principal Economist Reviewed by: Steven Findlay Principal Economist SF 13/11/20 Approved by: Nick Skelton Director NS 13/11/20 For and on behalf of Stantec UK Limited Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed 1 26/05/20 1st Draft EB, TK, SF SF 2 12/08/20 2nd Draft EB, TK, SF NS 3 30/10/20 3rd Draft EB, TK, SF NS 4 13/11/20 Final EB, TK, SF NS This report has been prepared by Stantec UK Limited (‘Stantec’) on behalf of its client to whom this report is addressed (‘Client’) in connection with the project described in this report and takes into account the Client's particular instructions and requirements. This report was prepared in accordance with the professional services appointment under which Stantec was appointed by its Client. This report is not intended for and should not be relied on by any third party (i.e. parties other than the Client).
    [Show full text]
  • A Wetland Sanctuary
    A wetland sanctuary In the very heart of the farmed fields of the fens lies an oasis for wetland wildlife, the Ouse Washes. Built to manage flood waters and protect farmland, the Washes also ©Anne & Chris Algar/WWT became a sanctuary for wetland wildlife as the fens were drained. With nearby remnants of the original fen and new wetland reserves, the unique Ouse Washes Landscape adds up to an amazing wildlife and cultural experience. ousewashes.org.uk ©Jamie Hall ©Simon Stirrup ©Helen Edmondson ©Mike Daines ©Mike ©Flickr/Peter Schoen ©Flickr/Peter Denver Sluice Complex Special places Dating back to the 1600s this site helps protect the people of the fens from flooding and plays a key role in navigation, conservation, water To fully experience this abstraction, agriculture and land drainage. unique landscape make gov.uk/government/organisations/ sure you include a visit environment-agency to these special places around the Ouse Washes. ©Nick Ford RSPB & Wildlife Trust BCN Ouse Washes nature reserve Visit this remote part of the Washlands for an WWT Welney Wetland Centre experience with a wild feel. View spectacular flocks of waterfowl from the hides and get close Get really close to the Ouse Washes and watch to scarce farmland birds from the visitor centre. thousands of wintering birds from the comfort rspb.org.uk/ousewashes & wildlifebcn.org/ of a visitor centre and heated observatory. reserves/ouse-washes In summer explore the wetlands in search of breeding birds, dragonflies and wildflowers. wwt.org.uk/welney ©rspb-images.com ©WWT/Sacha Dench ©WWT/Sacha Mepal Outdoor Centre Adventurous outdoor activities arranged as day and residential visits for schools and organised RSPB Fen Drayton Lakes & groups.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Bedford / Counterwash Drain
    The Old Bedford / Counterwash Drain Introduction. The Ouse Washes has 3 main water courses, the Hundred Foot River, the River Delph and the Old Bedford / Counter Drain. This paper is based on material complied from the fishing clubs that have the rights along the Old Bedford and Counter Drain, whilst leading Pike fisherman Denis Moules has lead the need to resolve many of the issues impacting on these venues. Denis states, I love my sport and have now captured more than 100 pike over 20 lbs, from Fenland. I have written two books, “The Fenland Thirties a History of Fenland Pike” and “Fenland Pike”. Both have been extremely successful. I am a retired detective having served 30 years in Cambridgeshire Constabulary. I am the liaison officer for the Pike Angler’s Club of Great Britain who I represent on the Lower Great Ouse and Fenland Fisheries Consultative. I am a member of several Fenland angling clubs giving active assistance to Kings Lynn and Welney. Both of these lease stretches of The Old Bedford – a drain with many underlying problems. Colin Dodd from Histon & District Angling Society has also been concerned for some time about the diminishing quality of the Fisheries at Southern end of the Ouse Washes. They have had fishing rights on the Old Bedford from Earith to Sutton Gault and from Earith to Mepal on the Counter Drain. Ouse Washes WMP 2002 Figure 6 Following major fish losses between 2001 and 2002, much effort was put into the creation of a consolidated Ouse Washes management Plan. Whilst the major issues in dealing with excess water removal have been resolved, under low conditions.
    [Show full text]