Freedom in the World 1978 Complete Book
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Freedom in the World Political Rights and Civil Liberties 1978 RAYMOND D. GASTIL With essays by Richard W. Cottam Robert A. Dahl Herbert J. Ellison Giovanni Sartori Published by Freedom House in cooperation with G. K. Hall & Co. 70 LINCOLN STREET, BOSTON, MASS. FREEDOM HOUSE, NEW YORK International Standard Book Number: 0-932088-00-7 Freedom House, 20 West 40th Street, New York, N.Y. 10018 International Standard Book Number: 0-8161-8301-5 G. K. Hall & Co., 70 Lincoln Street, Boston, Mass. 02111 Copyright © 1978 by Freedom House, Inc. All rights reserved. "A Realistic Appraisal of What Is Meant by Democratic Rule," Giovanni Sartori, from Democratic Theory, 2nd revised edition [1979]. Printed by permission of the author. "Democracy as Polyarchy," Robert A. Dahl, from Polyarchy: Par- ticipation and Opposition. Copyright 1971 by Yale University Press. Reprinted by permission. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Gastil, Raymond D Freedom in the world. Includes index. 1. Civil rights. I. Cottam, Richard W. II. Title. JC571.G336 323.4 78-53867 ISBN 0-932088-00-7 Contents PREFACE ix PART I: THE STUDY OF 1977 The Comparative Survey of Freedom 3 A Working Definition of Political and Civil Freedom 7 The Resources of the Survey 8 The Tabulated Ratings 9 Comparison with Other Surveys 23 Changes in 1977 30 Elections and Referenda 42 The Relation of Political-Economic Systems to Freedom 43 Peoples Without National Rights 51 Conclusion 60 The Year of Human Rights Introduction 64 Human Rights East and West, Herbert J. Ellison 71 The Case of Iran, Richard W. Cottam 88 PART II: FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES Freedom and Democracy: Definitions and Distinctions 111 Complementary Views of Democracy A Realistic Appraisal of What Is Meant by Democratic Rule, Giovanni Sartori 127 Democracy as Polyarchy, Robert A. Dahl 134 v vi CONTENTS The Importance of Ideas: How Democratic Institutions Be- come Established 147 The Relation of Alternative Political-Economic Systems to Freedom 163 Self-Determination, Subnationalities, and Freedom 180 PART III: COUNTRY SUMMARIES Introduction 219 Country Summaries 223 INDEX 327 Map and Tables The Map of Freedom 20-21 Tables 1. Independent Nations: Comparative Measures of Freedom 10 2. Related Territories: Comparative Measures of Freedom 14 3. Ranking of Nations by Political Rights 16 4. Ranking of Nations by Civil Liberties 17 5. Comparison of Surveys 25 6. National Elections or Referenda 36 7. Political-Economic Systems 44 8. Major Peoples Without a Nation-State 48 9. Major Peoples Separated from Existing Nation-States 53 10. Some Requirements for a Democracy Among a Large Number of People 135 11. Conditions Favoring Polyarchy 138 vii Preface he urge of men and women to make choices and divest themselves Tof natural and unnatural restrictions is as old as the human race. No less persistent is the compulsion of some to restrict and repress their fellows. In most times and places, the oppressors have carried the day. To be sure, religious toleration brought a glimmer of hope to the ancient world. The European Renaissance and Meiji restoration in Japan introduced new possibilities for human relationships. Self-determination of peoples received impetus after World War I, and the Four Free- doms inspired the free and unfree throughout World War II. Yet on the 24-hour clock by which the entire span of humanity on earth may be shown, individual freedom has been a broadly shared goal for only the past few seconds, and, even then, it has been far more widely recognized in theory than in practice. Table 1 (page 10) suggests that today barely thirty-five percent of the nations are free; more than 2.6 billion people are not free or are only partly free. Today, in countries considered unfree, dissenters speak of human freedoms through samizdat, manifestos, or the underground press. In free nations, as never before, the national and international politics of human rights is everywhere apparent. Indeed, 1977 may well be remembered as the Year of Human Rights. The Carter administration in the United States established a climate that supported freedom activists in many countries. The 1975 Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, the Helsinki Accords, had spotlighted the procedural elements of human rights. The 1977-78 conference to review progress since the Final Act took steps to institutionalize the international assessment of human rights in the thirty-five signatory countries. Freedom of the individual citizen, what- ever his nationality, has now been recognized as a concern of all peoples. As an aspect of its thirty-seven year mission to promote the defense and development of civil and political liberties, Freedom House has ix x PREFACE produced since 1950 an annual assessment of the status of freedom in the world. Beginning in 1972-73 these balance sheets were suc- ceeded by an annual Comparative Survey of Freedom. This is published along with evaluative essays for each continent in the January/February edition of the organization's publication Freedom at Issue. The Comparative Surveys have apparently filled a need for an improved perspective on the gains and losses, or threats and oppor- tunities, in the field of human freedoms. They have been extensively quoted by the mass news media around the world. In March 1977, the Department of State incorporated data from the Survey in each of eighty-two reports to Congress on the level of human rights in countries receiving security assistance. Inquiries have been made by foreign governments in Asia, Africa, Europe, and Latin America relating to the Survey's ratings and criteria. This interest suggests that the public might welcome a more sub- stantial form of the Comparative Survey. Such an expanded survey should incorporate additional research, develop the theoretical under- pinnings of the work, and show the relation of the work to current policy concerns. The volume before you is the first result of this effort at expansion. The material is divided into three parts. The first presents the basic data of the Comparative Survey as of January 1, 1978, and explains the meaning of the categories and the methods that are employed. In this part we have also included discussions of the current issue of greatest importance in the area of freedom, the question of how effectively a country such as the United States under the Carter administration can hope to influence human rights in other countries, particularly communist and Third World countries. The discussion depends primarily on invited pieces by two experts on the USSR and Iran respectively. The second part discusses in some depth four fundamental issues: the definition of freedom and constitutional democracy, the importance of the diffusion of democratic ideas, the relation of different economic systems to freedom, and the question of self-determination and sub- nationalism. The first, or definitional, essay, is complemented by selected writings from two leading authorities on freedom and democracy. The final part of the book consists of summary discussions of individual countries giving the facts about each that were most deter- minative of the ratings found in Part I. We acknowledge with deep appreciation the assistance in the conception of this volume provided by the Advisory Panel for the Comparative Survey consisting of Robert J. Alexander, Professor of Economics, Rutgers University; Richard W. Cottam, Professor of PREFACE xi Political Science, University of Pittsburgh; Herbert J. Ellison, Professor of History, University of Washington; Seymour Martin Lipset, Senior Fellow, the Hoover Institution; Lucian Pye, Professor of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Leslie Rubin, lawyer, professor and African specialist; Giovanni Sartori, Professor of Political Science, Stanford University; Robert Scalapino and Paul Seabury, Professors of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley. We thank Professors Robert A. Dahl and Giovanni Sartori for permission to excerpt material from their recent books. We acknowledge as well the guidance from its inception given the Comparative Survey of Freedom by Leonard R. Sussman, execu- tive director of Freedom House. And we are grateful for the support provided by the following foundations in the development of the Survey and the publication of this volume: the J. Howard Pew Freedom Trust, the John Dewey Foundation, and the Relm Foundation. JOHN RICHARDSON, JR. PRESIDENT OF FREEDOM HOUSE PART I The Study of 1977 The Comparative Survey of Freedom orld War II taught a generation the value of freedom, and the Wdifficulty with which it is maintained. After the war it was optimistically assumed that the United States and its allies could bring freedom to the rest of the world. Under direct military occupation West Germany, Italy, and Japan developed democratic systems. The United States supported anticolonialism almost everywhere, and aid was freely given to what were considered proto-democracies. But dis- illusionment soon set in. Independence did not always mean freedom. Economic development was slow, and often its achievement did not bring a people closer to democracy. The communist states achieved considerable equality and development, but showed few signs of evolution toward free states. Anticommunist leaders too often turned out to be tyrants as well. Our economic aid provided little leverage for creating democracies: it was no substitute for the political control that had allowed us to transform the former Axis nations into democracies. Disillusionment affected the political beliefs of leaders and intel- lectuals in both developed and underdeveloped countries. Lack of freedom in the underdeveloped world was said to mean that the people had evidently "chosen" not to be free, or that freedom "had no meaning" for them. It was said that political and civil liberties were not, after all, what most people really wanted; they were more interested in economic development and security, or in national success and pride. It was claimed that these could be achieved in poor nations only by establishing closely controlled societies.