A Good Weed #79 Spring 2017 a WEED Newsletter of the Weed Society of New South Wales Inc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Good Weed #79 Spring 2017 a WEED Newsletter of the Weed Society of New South Wales Inc GOOD A Good Weed #79 Spring 2017 A WEED Newsletter of the Weed Society of New South Wales Inc. ISSN 1325-3689 Spring 2017 Issue #79 Sonchus oleraceus (common sowthistle), a weed similar to fleabane, affecting most situations, glyphosate resistant and spread easily by wind-blown seeds Image: Andrew Storrie Featured stories in this edition Fleabane - coming at you from all angles NSW weeds conference last minute promo Biocontrol of boxing glove cactus Reminder for our next AGM at Grafton Page 1 A Good Weed #79 Spring 2017 In this issue Front cover 1 Contact Details Index and contacts details 2 Message from the President Postal Address: PO Box 8040 by Kim Hignell 3 Kooringal NSW 2650 NSW Weeds Conference news Secretary: [email protected] by Wayne Deer 4 Treasurer: [email protected] Fleabane — special feature Editor: [email protected] by Tony Cook 5 Website: www.nswweedsoc.org.au Bio-control boxing glove cactus Office Bearers for 2017 by Andrew McConnachie 11 Macspred — latest news President by Mark Francis 12 Kim Hignell (Lake Macquarie) Next Weeds Society AGM Vice President by Reece Luxton 13 Birgitte Verbeek (Tamworth) Plant Sure - nursey scheme Secretary by Des Boorman 14 Stephen Johnson (Orange) Chemcert 10 point herbiucide flow chart by Jonno Pearson 16 Treasurer and Public Officer Compound Sowing Technique Immediate Past President Rex Stanton (Wagga Wagga) by Hanwen Wu 18 DNA study on Panicum spp. Newsletter Editor by Yuchi Chen and Xiaochengg Zhu 20 Tony Cook (Tamworth) New member Assistant Newsletter Editor by James Mwendwa 22 Hanwen Wu (Wagga Wagga) Special feature for next issue Other Committee Members by Tony Cook 23 John Cameron (Wahroonga) Doug Campbell (Scone) Hillary Cherry (Forestville) Lawrie Greenup (Westleigh) ‘A Good Weed’ & ‘Punnet Tray’ are produced by Maria Edmonds (Cessnock) The Weed Society of New South Wales Inc. Reece Luxton (Grafton) Material from the publications can be reproduced and circulated with the acknowledgement of the Editor’s note authors. We have intentionally skipped the winter edition The opinions expressed in both publications by of A Good Weed due to delays with the autumn contributors are not necessarily those of the edition, which subsequently delayed the winter Executive Committee of The Weed Society of New edition. This edition has more content due to the South Wales Inc. backlog of articles. Enjoy the content. Tony Cook, newsletter editor Page 2 A Good Weed #79 Spring 2017 at the DPI Research Institute followed by a tour of Message from the President the Bio-control facility with Troy Brown. I am looking forward to this trip and I hope many members will attend. Welcome to our spring edition of ‘A Good Weed’ and welcome to all our new members of the Socie- If you would like to continue receiving this wonder- ty. The benefits of your membership of the Society ful newsletter “A Good Weed” and our publication include: “Punnet Tray”, can you please ensure that all your Opportunity to network with others interested in contact details including address and email are up to weed management date, so that the Society can continue to provide this service to you. Contact the Secretary of the Society Discounted registration for Society seminars with all new details. and workshops Finally yet importantly, I would like to remind all Opportunity to apply for Society Travel Awards non-financial members for 2017 that their member- ship fees are now overdue. The Society newsletter, A Good Weed, deliv- ered quarterly Happy weeding Access to the Society electronic newsletter, the Punnet Tray Discounted registration to attend the Australa- sian Weeds Conference Kim Discounted registration to attend the NSW Biennial Weeds Conference Additional financial prizes for the winners of Welcome to our new members the Buerckner and Stephenson Local Government Awards and the NSW Weed Industry Award. Geoffrey Riley (Inverell) Dr Michael Walsh (University of Sydney) All our members are receiving a $100 discount to Zachary Growns attend this year’s NSW Weeds Conference at Emily McCarthy (Strathfield) Armidale and they can obtain a similar discount at Christopher Clausen (CMC mapping) the Australasian Weeds Conference in September Troy Brown (NSW DPI Grafton) 2018 to be held at the Novotel, Manly. Anthony Schofield (Greater Sydney LLS) Wendy Bushell (Midcoast council) The NSW Weeds Conference with the theme Aaron Preston (Wagga Wagga) James Mwendwa (Wagga Wagga) “Experience the Highs – working smarter together” Kate Boyd (Uralla) is looking to be a great event. Come and see the Weed Society team at our stand to collect your free There has been a large influx of other new copy of the Weed Society publication called ‘50th members and they will be mentioned in the Jubilee: A history of the Weed Society of NSW next edition of A Good Weed. Thank you 1966 – 2016’ edited by Rex Stanton. It’s a great for joining. read. Enjoy the excellent services that the NSW Our AGM and Annual Dinner is to be held at Weed Society provides. Hope we meet you at the NSW Weeds Conference at Armidale. Grafton this year and we will be having the meeting Page 3 A Good Weed #79 Spring 2017 tacular field trips, impressive trade displays, confer- NSW Weeds Conference - news ence dinner as well as importantly discussing prob- lems and issues of mutual interest. The theme of the conference, “Experience the New England Weeds Authority to highs – working smarter together” looks to build on the successes of the past whilst looking to the th host 19 NSW State Weeds Con- future as the industry transitions into a new era in ference in Armidale from 16 - 19 weed management and control under the new Biose- October 2017 curity legislation, an approach that must be based on regional cooperation as well as providing a common New England Weeds Authority in conjunction with focus for the actions of the various land managers the Weeds Society of NSW and the NSW Depart- across all tenures. With this in mind session themes ment of Primary Industries will host the 19th NSW have been based on Biosecurity in Action; Technol- Weeds Conference at the University of New Eng- ogy & Innovation; Community, Extension & Social land, Armidale from 16 -19 October 2017. Marketing; Collaboration & Case Studies with a special feature being the Open Debate titled, “A The Chairman of New England Weeds Authority, landholder biosecurity duty is the best approach to Councillor Mark Dusting said “we are delighted to managing established weeds”. be hosting such a prestigious conference that will bring together delegates from not only across the The Conference opening will include local dignitar- State but from interstate as well. With the recent ies along with Mr Scott Hanson, Director General, introduction of the new Biosecurity Act 2015, and NSW Department of Primary Industries, with the the fact that the financial impact of weeds on agri- key note address by Prof David Lamb, McClymont culture alone costs approximately $2.5 billion a Distinguished Professor (Research), Precision Agri- year in lost production and an estimated further culture Research Group, University of New England $1.8 billion annually in control activities, there has who will be speaking on “Connecting to our farm- never been a more important time to come together to meet the many and varied challenges faced by weed professionals and the industry in general. He added, Conference will be a unique opportunity for the State’s weeds professionals and related industry representatives, researchers, market and industry analysts, government officials and policy makers to showcase their work, network ideas and share in a vision for the future of the weeds industry”. The Conference Organising Committee have been working hard over the last few months to ensure that delegates will not only have an enjoyable stay in Armidale and the New England region but they will also be challenged, captivated and inspired by the renowned speakers at the Conference, the spec- Page 4 A Good Weed #79 Spring 2017 Fleabane: coming at you from all angles Fleabane is a weed that should get the attention of all people. Every state and territory has this weed and this weed should deserve the title as the most ubiquitous species in Australia. There are many other species that could claim to have infestations in all states and territories of Australia, but it is the A common site: Fleabane showing the attributes diverse situations that this weed favours, making it of a good colonising plant (Image: Andrew Storrie) the standout characteristic of this weed. There are many situations that fleabane can survive Chronology of Fleabane dominance and thrive. The following list is by no means the complete list of preferred fleabane environments: About 30 years ago flax-leaf fleabane (Conyza Irrigation areas bonarensis) was barely on anyone’s radar. Back in Fallow paddocks the 80’s there were a few registered label use claims Fence lines on herbicide products for its control. No-tillage Around building / structures farming practices were commonplace in cropping Within crops, especially non-competitive crops districts and glyphosate seemed to be working well. Under various horticultural vines/trees Step by step this weed has developed in several Road sides ways to become one of the most problematic weeds Weed of establishing forestry plantations in Australia. Summer crops such cotton and sorghum Chronology of how fleabane has got the upper Neglected areas hand Horticulture and viticulture Weed of poorly competitive pastures Pre 1980’s: Fleabane was a minor weed and control Residential areas was mainly achieved by selective herbicides and regular cultivation All soil types, but prefers the lighter sandy loams 1980’s: No-tillage farming practices allowed Almost all moisture levels – drought tolerant to surface germinating fleabane seeds to emerge fully saturated soil however glyphosate and selective herbicides were working well It shouldn’t take long to walk outside along and find 1990’s: The regular use of glyphosate meant that a fleabane plant growing in the cracks of the con- fleabane populations were starting to show signs of crete.
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Anleitung Für Die Geographische Artendatenbank Nachdem Sie Die
    Anleitung für die geographische Artendatenbank Nachdem Sie die Anwendung gestartet haben, können Sie mit den entsprechenden Werkzeugen zur gewünschten geographischen Lage finden. Im linken Auswahlmenü wählen Sie bitte "Artenfunde digitalisieren". Mit dem Button können Sie einen Punkt in die Karte setzen. Bitte beachten Sie unbedingt, dass bevor ein Punkt gesetzt wird alles geladen ist. Es müssen ungefähr 1,4 MB (Artenliste mit ca. 19.000 Arten) geladen werden. Links erscheint dann ein Disketten Symbol . Nach klick auf das Symbol erscheint ein Fenster, in dem die erforderlichen Angaben einzutragen sind. Die Felder bis „Ort des Fundes“ sind Pflichtfelder, hier müssen unbedingt Eingaben gemacht werden. 1 Die Eingabe über Autor und E-Mail des Autors sowie Bemerkungen sollten ebenso eingegeben werden. Diese Angaben werden in der Datenbank gespeichert, jedoch nicht veröffentlicht. Diese Angaben dienen intern dazu, die Wertigkeit der Eingaben beurteilen zu können. Es stehen z.B. beim "Artenname" Pulldown-Listen zur Verfügung, dadurch wird eine einheitliche Eingabe garantiert. Es stehen ca. 19.000 Arten zur Verfügung. Sollte es für eine Art keinen deutschen Namen geben, steht der wissenschaftliche Name zur Verfügung. Die Liste ist alphabetisch sortiert. Außerdem werden in der Liste keine ü,ö,ä und ß verwendet. Die Namen werden mit Umlauten geschrieben. Die vollständige Liste finden Sie im Anhang zu dieser Anleitung. Das Datum ist im Format JJJJ-MM-TT (z.B. 2012-01-27) einzugeben. Das wäre der 27. Januar 2012. Beenden Sie alle Eingaben durch drücken auf "Speichern". Während Ihrer aktuellen Internetsitzung haben Sie die Möglichkeit mit dem Button die Eingabe des Datensatzes wieder aus der Datenbank zu löschen.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Monocotyledonae
    ACORUS/ACORACEAE 1077 CLASS MONOCOTYLEDONAE Plants usually herbaceous—in other words, lacking regular secondary thickening (except Palmaceae, Smilacaceae, most Agavaceae, and a few Poaceae); seedlings usually with 1 seed leaf or cotyledon; stems or branches elongating by apical growth and also by growth of basal por- tion of internodes; leaves when present alternate, whorled, basal, or rarely opposite, elongating by basal growth (readily seen on spring-flowering bulbs whose leaf-tips have been frozen back); leaf blades usually with parallel or concentrically curved veins, these unbranched or with inconspicuous, short, transverse connectives (leaves net-veined or with prominent midrib and spreading side-veins parallel with each other in Alismataceae, Araceae, Smilacaceae, Marantaceae, and some Orchidaceae); perianth with dissimilar inner and outer whorls (petals and sepals), or all parts about alike (tepals), the parianth parts separate or united, commonly in 3s, less often in 2s, rarely in 5s, or perianth of scales or bristles, or entirely absent. AWorldwide, the Monocotyledonae is a group composed of ca. 55,800 species in 2,652 genera arranged in 84 families (Mabberley 1997); 25 of these families occur in nc TX. The monocots appear to be a well-supported monophyletic group derived from within the monosulcate Magnoliidae group of dicots (Chase et al. 1993; Duvall et al. 1993; Qiu et al. 1993). From the cla- distic standpoint, the dicots are therefore paraphyletic and thus inappropriate for formal recog- nition (see explantion and Fig. 41 in Apendix 6). Within the monocots, Acorus appears to be the sister group to all other monocots, with the Alismataceae (and Potamogeton) being the next most basal group (Duvall et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Weeds of Grain Cropping – the Ute Guide
    Title: Common Weeds of Grain Cropping: The Ute Guide Authors: Andrew Storrie (Agronomo), Penny Heuston (Heuston Agronomy Services) and Jason Emms (GRDC) Acknowledgements: The GRDC would like to thank all the various individuals (who have been acknowledged with their photos) who provided images for use in this guide. ISBN: 978-1-922342-02-7 (print) 978-1-922342-03-4 (online) Published: April 2020 Copyright: © 2020 Grains Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. GRDC contact details: Ms Maureen Cribb Integrated Publications Manager, PO Box 5367, KINGSTON ACT 2604 Email: [email protected] Design and production: Coretext, www.coretext.com.au Cover: Caltrop Photo: Jason Emms (GRDC) Disclaimer: Any recommendations, suggestions or opinions contained in this publication do not necessarily represent the policy or views of the Grains Research and Development Corporation. No person should act on the basis of the contents of this publication without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice. GRDC will not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of any person using or relying on the information in this publication. Copyright © All material published in this guide is copyright protected and may not be reproduced in any form without written permission from GRDC. WE WANT YOUR FEEDBACK We’re looking for ways to improve our products and services and would like to know what you think of the Common Weeds of Grain Cropping: The Ute Guide. Complete a short five-minute online survey to tell us what you think. www.grdc.com.au/weedsuteguide grdc.com.au 3 CONTENTS grdc.com.au 4 Purpose of this guide ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Species of the Comanche National Grassland in United States Department Southeastern Colorado of Agriculture
    Vascular Plant Species of the Comanche National Grassland in United States Department Southeastern Colorado of Agriculture Forest Service Donald L. Hazlett Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-130 June 2004 Hazlett, Donald L. 2004. Vascular plant species of the Comanche National Grassland in southeast- ern Colorado. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-130. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 36 p. Abstract This checklist has 785 species and 801 taxa (for taxa, the varieties and subspecies are included in the count) in 90 plant families. The most common plant families are the grasses (Poaceae) and the sunflower family (Asteraceae). Of this total, 513 taxa are definitely known to occur on the Comanche National Grassland. The remaining 288 taxa occur in nearby areas of southeastern Colorado and may be discovered on the Comanche National Grassland. The Author Dr. Donald L. Hazlett has worked as an ecologist, botanist, ethnobotanist, and teacher in Latin America and in Colorado. He has specialized in the flora of the eastern plains since 1985. His many years in Latin America prompted him to include Spanish common names in this report, names that are seldom reported in floristic pub- lications. He is also compiling plant folklore stories for Great Plains plants. Since Don is a native of Otero county, this project was of special interest. All Photos by the Author Cover: Purgatoire Canyon, Comanche National Grassland You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Landscape Surveillance for New Weed Threats Project: a Compilation of the Annual Reports on New Plant Naturalisations in South Australia 2010-2016
    State Herbarium of South Australia Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium Economic & Sustainable Development Group Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Regional Landscape Surveillance for New Weed Threats Project: A compilation of the annual reports on new plant naturalisations in South Australia 2010-2016 Chris J. Brodie, Helen P. Vonow, Peter D. Canty, Peter J. Lang, Jürgen Kellermann & Michelle Waycott 2017 This document is a compilation of the Regional Landscape Surveillance reports by the State Herbarium of South Australia, covering the financial years 2009/10 to 2015/16. The reports are republished unchanged. The original page numbering has been retained. Each report should be cited as originally published. The correct citation is indicated on the back of the cover page of each report. This compilation should be cited as: Brodie, C.J.1, Vonow, H.P.1, Canty, P.D.1, Lang, P.J.1, Kellermann, J.1,2 & Waycott, M.1,2 (2017). Regional Landscape Surveillance for New Weed Threats Project: A compilation of the annual reports on new plant naturalisations in South Australia 2010-2016. (State Herbarium of South Australia: Adelaide). Authors’ addresses: 1 State Herbarium of South Australia, Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR), GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA 5001. 2 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005. ISBN 978-1-922027-51-1 (PDF) Published and available on Enviro Data SA data.environment.sa.gov.au With the exception of images and other material protected by a trademark and subject to review by the Government of South Australia at all times, the content of this publications is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
    [Show full text]
  • Stekelige Hanenpoot (Echinochloa Muricata): Competitiviteit En Reactie Ten Aanzien Van Herbiciden
    Faculteit Bio-ingenieurswetenschappen Academiejaar 2010 – 2011 Stekelige hanenpoot (Echinochloa muricata): competitiviteit en reactie ten aanzien van herbiciden Riek Rombaut Promotor: dr. ir. B. De Cauwer Masterproef voorgedragen tot het behalen van de graad van Master in de bio-ingenieurswetenschappen: landbouwkunde Faculteit Bio-ingenieurswetenschappen Academiejaar 2010 – 2011 Stekelige hanenpoot (Echinochloa muricata): competitiviteit en reactie ten aanzien van herbiciden Riek Rombaut Promotor: dr. ir. B. De Cauwer Masterproef voorgedragen tot het behalen van de graad van Master in de bio-ingenieurswetenschappen: landbouwkunde De auteur en de promotor geven de toelating deze scriptie voor consultatie beschikbaar te stellen en delen ervan te kopiëren voor persoonlijk gebruik. Elk ander gebruik valt onder de beperkingen van het auteursrecht, in het bijzonder met betrekking tot de verplichting de bron te vermelden bij het aanhalen van resultaten uit deze scriptie. The author and the promotor give the permission to use this thesis for consultation and to copy parts of it for personal use. Any other use is subject to the copyright laws, more specifically the source must be extensively quoted when citing results from this thesis. Datum: dr. ir. DE CAUWER Benny ROMBAUT Riek WOORD VOORAF Het vinden van de gepaste woorden om deze eerste pagina als laatste gevuld te krijgen, blijkt een verdomd lastige opdracht. De onbewuste neiging waarmee voorheen onbekende of zelden gebruikte woorden als „onkruidgiersten‟, „Echinochloa‟, „HPPD-remmer‟, „competitiviteit‟ of „dosis- respons‟ zich met de regelmaat van de klok in mijn gedachten en zinnen trachten binnen te wurmen is onverwacht groot. Toch worstel ik bijzonder graag met tijd en woordenschat om een aantal mensen van harte te bedanken.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    DLITERATURE CITED ABU-ASAB, M.S. and P. D. C ANTINO. 1989. Pollen morphology of _____. 1982. Paspalum distichum L. var. indutum Shinners Trichostema (Labiatae) and its systematic implications.Syst. (Poaceae). Great Basin Naturalist 42:101–104. Bot. 14:359–369. _____. 1984a. Studies in the Aristida (Gramineae) of the south- _____ and _____. 1993. Phylogenetic implications of pollen eastern United States.I.Spikelet variation in A.purpurascens, morphology in tribe Ajugeae (Labiatae).Syst.Bot.18:100–122. A.tenuispica,and A.virgata.Rhodora 86:73–77. ACHEY,D.M.1933. A revision of the section Gymnocaulis of the _____. 1984b. Morphologic variation and classification of the genus Orobanche.Bull.Torrey Bot. Club 60:441–451. North American Aristida purpurea complex (Gramineae). ADAMS,R.P.1972. Chemosystematic and numerical studies of Brittonia 36:382–395. natural populations of Juniperus pinchotii Sudworth.Taxon _____. 1985a.Studies in the Aristida (Gramineae) of the southeast- 21:407–427. ern United States. II. Morphometric analysis of A. intermedia _____. 1975. Numerical-chemosystematic studies of infraspecific and A.longespica.Rhodora 87:137–145. variation in Juniperus pinchotii.Biochem.Syst.& Ecol.3:71–74. _____. 1985b. Studies in the Aristida (Gramineae) of the south- _____. 1986. Geographical variation in Juniperus silicola and J. eastern United States. III. Nomenclature and a taxonomic virginiana in the southeastern United States: Multivariate comparison of A.lanosa and A.palustris.Rhodora 87:147–155. analysis of morphology and terpenoids.Taxon 35:61–75. _____. 1986. Studies in the Aristida (Gramineae) of the south- _____. 1993. Juniperus.In:Flora of North America Editorial eastern United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatural Features Inventory of the Smoky Hill Ang Range, Kansas
    A NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY OF THE SMOKY HILL ANG RANGE , KANSAS Open-file Report No. 137 September 15, 2007 Kansas Biological Survey 2101 Constant Ave. Lawrence, KS 66047 A NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY OF THE SMOKY HILL ANG RANGE, KANSAS PREPARED FOR AIR NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 3500 FETCHET AVENUE ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-5157 AND SMOKY HILL AIR NATIONAL GUARD RANGE 8429 WEST FARRELLY ROAD SALINA, KS 67401-9407 SEPTEMBER 15, 2007 Citation: Busby, W. H., J. M. Delisle, C. C. Freeman, K. Kindscher, H. Loring, D. E. Nimz, and C. J. Schmidt. 2007. A natural features inventory of the Smoky Hill ANG Range, Kansas. Open-file Report No. 137. Kansas Biological Survey, Lawrence, KS. 403 pp. Assume corporate authorship for chapters and appendices except where stated otherwise. Chapters and appendices with individual authors may be cited as in the following example: Kindscher, K., and H. Loring. 2007. Plant communities and landscape features. Pp. 11—34. In Busby, W. H., J. M. Delisle, C. C. Freeman, K. Kindscher, H. Loring, D. E. Nimz, and C. J. Schmidt. 2007. A natural features inventory of the Smoky Hill ANG Range, Kansas. Open-file Report No. 137. Kansas Biological Survey, Lawrence, KS. 403 pp. Cover Photo: Smoky Hill ANG Range Landscape. Hillary Loring. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………… i List of Figures………………………………………………………………………………. iv List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………….. vi Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………. viii Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………… ix Chapter 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. 1 1.1. Project Background …………………………………………………………………. 1 1.2. Study Objectives…………………………………………………………………….. 1 1.3. Study Area…………………………………………………………………………… 4 1.4. Overview of Ecological History, Current Conditions, and Land Management Recommendations ………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Panicum Riparium H. Scholz – Eine Neoindigene Art Europas?
    Kochia07:Layout 1 20130208 10.02.13 17:54 Seite 1 kochia 7: 1–24 (2013) 1 Panicum riparium H. S cHolz – eine neoindigene Art Europas? Uwe AmArell zusammenfassung : Panicum riparium wurde (Conert 1998), 470 ( ClAyton & r envoize 1986) 2002 als neoindigene Art aus Deutschland neu bis ca. 500 ( HitCHCoCk & C HAse 1910). Die Gat - beschrieben. Die merkmale der Art werden kri - tung zeigt vor allem in nord- und südamerika tisch untersucht und mit denen von P. capillare sowie in Afrika einen großen Artenreichtum. verglichen. eine karte zeigt erstmals die bislang Dort lassen die Panicum- Arten als Anpassungen bekannte verbreitung von P. riparium in europa. an unterschiedliche lebensräume eine erheb - es wurden historische Herbarbelege gefunden, liche morphologische vielfalt erkennen. die bis in das 18. Jahrhundert zurückreichen. nach Untersuchungen von AlisCioni & al. ein merkmalsvergleich bestätigt die weitgehende (2003) erweist sich die Gattung in der her - übereinstimmung mit amerikanischen Pflanzen. kömmlichen Umgrenzung jedoch als polyphy - eine taxonomische klärung der amerikanischen letisch. erste Ansätze zu einer neugliederung sippen des P.-capillare- Aggregats lässt keine des verwandtschaftskreises führen zu einer zweifel: die merkmale des P. riparium sind weit - monophyletischen Gattung Panicum mit nur gehend identisch mit denen des P. barbipulvi - ca. 100 Arten ( AlisCioni & al. 2003). natum nAsH . P. riparium ist somit in die syno - Die Gattung Panicum ist kein Bestandteil nymie dieser Art zu stellen. der ursprünglichen mitteleuropäischen Flora, jedoch wurden einige Arten bewusst (als erga - Abstract: Panicum riparium H. ScHolz – a siophyten) oder unbewusst (als Xenophyten) neoindigenous species in Europe? P. riparium durch den menschen eingeführt und zeigen was newly described as a neoindigenous eine unterschiedliche tendenz zur einbürgerung.
    [Show full text]