Anatural Features Inventory of the Smoky Hill Ang Range, Kansas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Anatural Features Inventory of the Smoky Hill Ang Range, Kansas A NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY OF THE SMOKY HILL ANG RANGE , KANSAS Open-file Report No. 137 September 15, 2007 Kansas Biological Survey 2101 Constant Ave. Lawrence, KS 66047 A NATURAL FEATURES INVENTORY OF THE SMOKY HILL ANG RANGE, KANSAS PREPARED FOR AIR NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 3500 FETCHET AVENUE ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-5157 AND SMOKY HILL AIR NATIONAL GUARD RANGE 8429 WEST FARRELLY ROAD SALINA, KS 67401-9407 SEPTEMBER 15, 2007 Citation: Busby, W. H., J. M. Delisle, C. C. Freeman, K. Kindscher, H. Loring, D. E. Nimz, and C. J. Schmidt. 2007. A natural features inventory of the Smoky Hill ANG Range, Kansas. Open-file Report No. 137. Kansas Biological Survey, Lawrence, KS. 403 pp. Assume corporate authorship for chapters and appendices except where stated otherwise. Chapters and appendices with individual authors may be cited as in the following example: Kindscher, K., and H. Loring. 2007. Plant communities and landscape features. Pp. 11—34. In Busby, W. H., J. M. Delisle, C. C. Freeman, K. Kindscher, H. Loring, D. E. Nimz, and C. J. Schmidt. 2007. A natural features inventory of the Smoky Hill ANG Range, Kansas. Open-file Report No. 137. Kansas Biological Survey, Lawrence, KS. 403 pp. Cover Photo: Smoky Hill ANG Range Landscape. Hillary Loring. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………… i List of Figures………………………………………………………………………………. iv List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………….. vi Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………. viii Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………… ix Chapter 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. 1 1.1. Project Background …………………………………………………………………. 1 1.2. Study Objectives…………………………………………………………………….. 1 1.3. Study Area…………………………………………………………………………… 4 1.4. Overview of Ecological History, Current Conditions, and Land Management Recommendations ………………………………………………………………….. 7 1.4.1. Management goals and philosophy………………………………………………... 7 1.4.2. Historical ecological conditions……………………………………………………. 7 1.4.3. Current Ecological Conditions……………………………………………………... 7 1.4.4. Current Land Management………………………………………………………… 8 1.4.5. Land Management Discussion and Recommendations…………………………… 8 Chapter 2. Plant Communities and Landscape Features…………………………………… 11 2.1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………….. 11 2.1.1. Management Areas on the Smoky Hill ANGR……………………………………. 11 2.1.2. Past Land Uses…………………………………………………………………….. 13 2.1.3. Objectives of Community Vegetation Data Collection…………………………… 15 2.2. Methods……………………………………………………………………………… 15 2.2.1. Community Assessments………………………………………………………….. 15 2.2.2. Percent Cover of Plant Species……………………………………………………. 15 2.2.3. Condition Grades………………………………………………………………….. 20 2.2.4. Floristic Quality Assessment and Shannon Diversity Index………………………. 20 2.2.5. Soils………………………………………………………………………………... 21 2.2.6. Rangeland Areas Adjacent to Smoky Hill ANGR………………………………… 21 2.2.7. Riparian Area……………………………………………………………………… 21 2.3. Results……………………………………………………………………………….. 23 2.3.1. Former Crop Fields and Historic Landscape……………………………………… 23 2.3.2. Plant Communities and Landscape Features……………………………………… 23 2.3.3. Plant Community Data from Tallgrass Prairie…………………………………….. 26 2.3.4. Riparian Woodland Results……………………………………………………….. 33 2.4. Conclusions………………………………………………………………………….. 34 Chapter 3. Floristic Surveys………………………………………………………………... 35 3.1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………….. 35 3.2. Methods……………………………………………………………………………… 36 3.3. Results and Discussion………………………………………………………………. 38 3.3.1. General Surveys…………………………………………………………………… 38 3.3.2. Rare Vascular Plants………………………………………………………………. 42 3.3.2.1. Federal-listed Species…………………………………………………………… 42 i 3.3.2.2. State-rare Species………………………………………………………………... 42 3.3.3. Floristic Surveys…………………………………………………………………... 45 3.3.4. Weed Surveys……………………………………………………………………... 50 3.4. Conclusions………………………………………………………………………...... 56 Chapter 4. Animal Surveys………………………………………………………………… 58 4.1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………...... 58 4.2. Rare and Endangered Animal Species………………………………………………. 59 4.2.1. Methods……………………………………………………………………………. 59 4.2.2. Results and Discussion…………………………………………………………….. 59 4.2.2.1. Federal-listed Species…………………………………………………………… 59 4.2.2.2. State-listed and Rare Species……………………………………………………. 62 4.3. General Vertebrate Surveys…………………………………………………………. 73 4.3.1. Reptiles and Amphibians………………………………………………………….. 73 4.3.1.1. Materials and Methods…………………………………………………………... 73 4.3.1.2. Results…………………………………………………………………………… 78 4.3.1.3. Discussion……………………………………………………………….………. 80 4.3.1.4. Species Accounts………………………………………………………………... 82 4.3.1.5. Potential Species………………………………………………………………… 103 4.3.2. Mammal Surveys………………………………………………………………….. 103 4.3.2.1. Materials and Methods…………………………………………………………... 103 4.3.2.2. Results…………………………………………………………………………… 106 4.3.2.3. Discussion……………………………………………………………………….. 112 4.3.2.4. Species Accounts………………………………………………………………... 113 4.3.2.5. Potential Species………………………………………………………………… 129 4.3.3. Bird Surveys……………………………………………………………………….. 129 4.3.3.1. Materials and Methods…………………………………………………………... 129 4.3.3.2. Results and Discussion…………………………………………………………... 131 4.3.3.3. Potential Species………………………………………………………………… 138 4.4. Abundances of Breeding Birds According to Fire, Hay, or Cattle Grazing Management…………………………………………………………………………. 138 4.4.1. Materials and Methods…………………………………………………………….. 138 4.4.2. Results and Discussion…………………………………………………………….. 141 4.4.3. Management Recommendations…………………………………………………... 145 Chapter 5. Evaluation of Range Management Practices…………………………………… 151 5.1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………….. 151 5.2. Range Tour Notes…………………………………………………………………… 152 5.3. Overview of Recommendations……………………………………………………... 154 5.4. Post-Tour Comments from Evaluation Team Members…………………………….. 157 Chapter 6. Preparation of Recommendations and Action Plan for Control and Abatement of Invasive and Non-Native Species…………………………………………… 160 6.1. Background………………………………………………………………………….. 160 6.1.1. Study Ojectives…………………………………………………………………….. 160 6.2. Tasks………………………………………………………………………………… 160 6.2.1. Background Rsearch………………………………………………………………. 160 6.2.2. Analyze and Evaluate Database…………………………………………………… 161 6.2.3. Identify Data Gaps………………………………………………………………… 161 ii 6.2.4. Methodology Development………………………………………………………... 161 6.2.5. Classification of Vegetative Community Types…………………………………... 162 6.2.6. Field Verify Plant Community Mapping Units……………………………………. 162 6.2.7. Delineate Boundaries of Critical Habitat and Stands of Non-Native Plants………. 162 6.2.8. Conduct Qualitative Surveys for the Presence of Non-native and Invasive Species 162 6.2.9. Integrate Updated Plant Community Mapping into Current ANG GIS Database… 163 6.2.10. Prepare a Report of Recommendations and Action Plan for Control and Abatement of Invasive and Non-native Species………………………………….. 163 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………………………... 164 Appendix A.1. Average percent cover for species found in grassland habitats……………. 169 Appendix A.2. Average percent cover for species found in riparian plots………………… 175 Appendix B. Vascular plants documented in Saline County and on Smoky Hill ANGR…. 177 Appendix C. Checklist of birds reported in Saline County and on Smoky Hill ANGR…… 195 Appendix D. Results of breeding bird surveys conducted on Smoky Hill ANGR from 2003 to 2006…………………………………………………………… 205 Appendix E. Data layers provided in ArcView GIS format……………………………….. 208 Appendix F.1. Report on Land Use History……………………………………………….. 210 Appendix F.2. U. S. Military Training in Saline County--Unit Histories…………………. 286 Appendix G. Report on Invasive and Non-native Species………………………………… 310 iii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1.1. Map of Smoky Hill ANGR showing major roads and streams………….. 5 FIGURE 1.2. Management units at Smoky Hill ANGR. Unit boundaries conform to those of section lines………………………………………………….. 6 FIGURE 2.1. Land use by agricultural lease agreement at Smoky Hill ANGR……….. 12 FIGURE 2.2. Map of public land survey of 1859……………………………………… 14 FIGURE 2.3. Land use at Smoky Hill ANGR in the late 1930s……………………….. 16 FIGURE 2.4. Locations of all vegetation plots on Smoky Hill ANGR………………... 17 FIGURE 2.5. Locations of permanent vegetation plots………………………………... 19 FIGURE 2.6. Locations of vegetation plots sampled from adjacent private ranches…... 22 FIGURE 2.7. Plant communities and landscape features………………………………. 24 FIGURE 2.8. Mean richness values (average of all species by plot) and standard errors by management type……………………………………………… 27 FIGURE 2.9. Comparison of mean condition grades assigned to plots by management type………………………………………………………… 29 FIGURE 2.10. Comparison of mean floristic quality indices by management type…….. 30 FIGURE 2.11. Comparison of mean Shannon’s Diversity indices by management type.. 31 FIGURE 2.12. Soil nutrients in hay, impact, and pasture areas…………………............. 32 FIGURE 3.1. Weed survey form used on Smoky Hill ANGR in 2006………………… 39 FIGURE 3.2. Locations of major plant collection sites on Smoky Hill ANGR; 2003—2006……………………………………………………………… 40 FIGURE 3.3. Kansas distribution of six state-rare plant species documented on or near Smoky Hill ANGR………………………………………………. 46 FIGURE 3.4. Distribution of alien status ranks among introduced vascular plants in Saline County and on Smoky Hill ANGR………………………………. 48 FIGURE 3.5. Distribution of coefficients of conservatism among vascular plant taxa in Saline County and on Smoky Hill ANGR……………………….. 50 FIGURE 3.6. Populations of Carduus nutans documented on Smoky Hill ANGR
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • C10 Beano1senn.Mimosa.Amo-Des
    LEGUMINOSAE PART ONE Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoideae, Papilionoideae, Amorpha to Desmodium Revised 04 May 2015 BEAN FAMILY 1 Amphicarpaea CAESALPINIACEAE Cassia Anthyllis Cercis Apios Chamaecrista Astragalus Gleditsia Baptisia Gymnocladus Caragana Senna Cladrastus MIMOSACEAE Desmanthus Coronilla Mimosa Crotalaria Schrankia Dalea PAPILIONACEAE Amorpha Desmodium un-copyrighted draught --- “No family of the vegetable kingdom possesses a higher claim to the attention of the naturalist than the Leguminosae, wether we regard them as objects of ornament or utility. Of the former, we might mention the splendid varieties of Cercis, with their purple flowers, the Acacias, with their airy foliage and silky stamens, the Pride of India, Colutea, and Cæsalpina, with a host of others, which, like the Sweet Pea, are redolent with perfume. Of the latter, the beans, peas, lentils, clover, and lucerne, are too well known to require recommendation. Among timber trees, the Rosewood (a Brazilian species of Mimosa), the Laburnum, whose wood is durable and of an olive-green color, and the Locust of our own country are preëminent. The following are a few important officinal products of this order. In medicine; liquorice is the product of the root of Glycyrrhiza glabra of S. Europe. The purgative senna consists of leaves of Cassia Senna, C. acutifolia, C. Æthiopica, and other species of Egypt and Arabia. C. Marilandica is also a cathartic, but more mild than the former. The sweet pulp tamarind, is the product of a large and beautiful tree (Tamarindus Indica) of the E. and W. Indies. Resins and Balsams: Gum Senegal is yielded by Acacia Verek of the River Senegal; Gum Arabic, by several species of Acacia of Central Africa; Gum Tragacynth, by Astragalus verus, &c., Persia.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Owner's List (As of 10/26/2020)
    Property Owner's List (As of 10/26/2020) MAP/LOT OWNER ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE PROP LOCATION I01/ 1/ / / LEAVITT, DONALD M & PAINE, TODD S 828 PARK AV BALTIMORE MD 21201 55 PINE ISLAND I01/ 1/A / / YOUNG, PAUL F TRUST; YOUNG, RUTH C TRUST 14 MITCHELL LN HANOVER NH 03755 54 PINE ISLAND I01/ 2/ / / YOUNG, PAUL F TRUST; YOUNG, RUTH C TRUST 14 MITCHELL LN HANOVER NH 03755 51 PINE ISLAND I01/ 3/ / / YOUNG, CHARLES FAMILY TRUST 401 STATE ST UNIT M501 PORTSMOUTH NH 03801 49 PINE ISLAND I01/ 4/ / / SALZMAN FAMILY REALTY TRUST 45-B GREEN ST JAMAICA PLAIN MA 02130 46 PINE ISLAND I01/ 5/ / / STONE FAMILY TRUST 36 VILLAGE RD APT 506 MIDDLETON MA 01949 43 PINE ISLAND I01/ 6/ / / VASSOS, DOUGLAS K & HOPE-CONSTANCE 220 LOWELL RD WELLESLEY HILLS MA 02481-2609 41 PINE ISLAND I01/ 6/A / / VASSOS, DOUGLAS K & HOPE-CONSTANCE 220 LOWELL RD WELLESLEY HILLS MA 02481-2609 PINE ISLAND I01/ 6/B / / KERNER, GERALD 317 W 77TH ST NEW YORK NY 10024-6860 38 PINE ISLAND I01/ 7/ / / KERNER, LOUISE G 317 W 77TH ST NEW YORK NY 10024-6860 36 PINE ISLAND I01/ 8/A / / 2012 PINE ISLAND TRUST C/O CLK FINANCIAL INC COHASSET MA 02025 23 PINE ISLAND I01/ 8/B / / MCCUNE, STEVEN; MCCUNE, HENRY CRANE; 5 EMERY RD SALEM NH 03079 26 PINE ISLAND I01/ 8/C / / MCCUNE, STEVEN; MCCUNE, HENRY CRANE; 5 EMERY RD SALEM NH 03079 33 PINE ISLAND I01/ 9/ / / 2012 PINE ISLAND TRUST C/O CLK FINANCIAL INC COHASSET MA 02025 21 PINE ISLAND I01/ 9/A / / 2012 PINE ISLAND TRUST C/O CLK FINANCIAL INC COHASSET MA 02025 17 PINE ISLAND I01/ 9/B / / FLYNN, MICHAEL P & LOUISE E 16 PINE ISLAND MEREDITH NH
    [Show full text]
  • History of Arapahoe County
    History of Arapahoe County Arapahoe County was named for the Arapaho Indians, one of the In the late 1820s, trappers searched larger tribes of plains Indians, who along with the Cheyenne occupied this region for beavers to supply Arapahoe County east of the foothills running into what is now western the great demand for mens beaver Kansas. Arapahoe County is Colorado’s first county, since almost hats. In the late 1830s and 1840s, half of the entire area now Colorado was Arapahoe County of the the demand shifted to buffalo Kansas territory. In 1861, when Kansas was made a state, Colorado skins. In 1832, the first trading was made a territory with Arapahoe County as one of the 17 original post on the South Platte River was counties. built on Cherry Creek, which was then part of Arapahoe County. The original Arapahoe County was 30 miles wide and extended from Sheridan Boulevard, the present western boundary of Denver, Adams In 1848, gold prospectors on and Arapahoe counties to the Kansas border. This peculiar shape was their way to California stopped in due to the practice of giving counties with large amounts of plains Colorado long enough to pan its territory at least some of the foothill territory where there was water streams. They found gold on West for mining and irrigation. Even though Arapahoe County did not Dartmouth Avenue, just west of reach the foothills, the streams running from the mountains supplied Englewood where Dry Creek flows water. As settlers came in and took up lands on the eastern portions into the Platte River.
    [Show full text]
  • Legumes of the North-Central States: C
    LEGUMES OF THE NORTH-CENTRAL STATES: C-ALEGEAE by Stanley Larson Welsh A Dissertation Submitted, to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Systematic Botany Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. Signature was redacted for privacy. artment Signature was redacted for privacy. Dean of Graduat College Iowa State University Of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa I960 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORICAL ACCOUNT 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 8 TAXONOMIC AND NOMENCLATURE TREATMENT 13 REFERENCES 158 APPENDIX A 176 APPENDIX B 202 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express his deep gratitude to Professor Duane Isely for assistance in the selection of the problem and for the con­ structive criticisms and words of encouragement offered throughout the course of this investigation. Support through the Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station and through the Industrial Science Research Institute made possible the field work required in this problem. Thanks are due to the curators of the many herbaria consulted during this investigation. Special thanks are due the curators of the Missouri Botanical Garden, U. S. National Museum, University of Minnesota, North Dakota Agricultural College, University of South Dakota, University of Nebraska, and University of Michigan. The cooperation of the librarians at Iowa State University is deeply appreciated. Special thanks are due Dr. G. B. Van Schaack of the Missouri Botanical Garden library. His enthusiastic assistance in finding rare botanical volumes has proved invaluable in the preparation of this paper. To the writer's wife, Stella, deepest appreciation is expressed. Her untiring devotion, work, and cooperation have made this work possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Biology Island Biology
    IIssllaanndd bbiioollooggyy Allan Sørensen Allan Timmermann, Ana Maria Martín González Camilla Hansen Camille Kruch Dorte Jensen Eva Grøndahl, Franziska Petra Popko, Grete Fogtmann Jensen, Gudny Asgeirsdottir, Hubertus Heinicke, Jan Nikkelborg, Janne Thirstrup, Karin T. Clausen, Karina Mikkelsen, Katrine Meisner, Kent Olsen, Kristina Boros, Linn Kathrin Øverland, Lucía de la Guardia, Marie S. Hoelgaard, Melissa Wetter Mikkel Sørensen, Morten Ravn Knudsen, Pedro Finamore, Petr Klimes, Rasmus Højer Jensen, Tenna Boye Tine Biedenweg AARHUS UNIVERSITY 2005/ESSAYS IN EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY Teachers: Bodil K. Ehlers, Tanja Ingversen, Dave Parker, MIchael Warrer Larsen, Yoko L. Dupont & Jens M. Olesen 1 C o n t e n t s Atlantic Ocean Islands Faroe Islands Kent Olsen 4 Shetland Islands Janne Thirstrup 10 Svalbard Linn Kathrin Øverland 14 Greenland Eva Grøndahl 18 Azores Tenna Boye 22 St. Helena Pedro Finamore 25 Falkland Islands Kristina Boros 29 Cape Verde Islands Allan Sørensen 32 Tristan da Cunha Rasmus Højer Jensen 36 Mediterranean Islands Corsica Camille Kruch 39 Cyprus Tine Biedenweg 42 Indian Ocean Islands Socotra Mikkel Sørensen 47 Zanzibar Karina Mikkelsen 50 Maldives Allan Timmermann 54 Krakatau Camilla Hansen 57 Bali and Lombok Grete Fogtmann Jensen 61 Pacific Islands New Guinea Lucía de la Guardia 66 2 Solomon Islands Karin T. Clausen 70 New Caledonia Franziska Petra Popko 74 Samoa Morten Ravn Knudsen 77 Tasmania Jan Nikkelborg 81 Fiji Melissa Wetter 84 New Zealand Marie S. Hoelgaard 87 Pitcairn Katrine Meisner 91 Juan Fernandéz Islands Gudny Asgeirsdottir 95 Hawaiian Islands Petr Klimes 97 Galápagos Islands Dorthe Jensen 102 Caribbean Islands Cuba Hubertus Heinicke 107 Dominica Ana Maria Martin Gonzalez 110 Essay localities 3 The Faroe Islands Kent Olsen Introduction The Faroe Islands is a treeless archipelago situated in the heart of the warm North Atlantic Current on the Wyville Thompson Ridge between 61°20’ and 62°24’ N and between 6°15’ and 7°41’ W.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • Kell Am See Mit Den Orten Heddert, Kell, Mandern, Schillingen & Waldweiler
    Kell am See mit den Orten Heddert, Kell, Mandern, Schillingen & Waldweiler (Standesamt und Kirchenbücher) Alphabetische Liste Familiennamen Ortschaften Alphabetische Liste Alphabetische Liste - 23.095 Personen Kell am See – mit den Orten Heddert, Kell, Mandern, Schillingen & Waldweiler 1686 - 1900 (Standesamt und Kirchenbücher) Autor: Heribert Scholer A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z NN A AALER Margaretha *u1758 Hentern 1781 LICHTMES Adam AARON Adam *1836 Heddert AARON Anna Maria *u1783, +Wald von Kammerforst AARON Caspar *1809 Laudenbach AARON Elisabeth *u1775, Raum Rödelshütte u1800 CHRIST Caspar AARON Franz *u1750 Schillingen I. <1781 WEINS, HEIMES Margaretha II. 1820 HANSEN Eva AARON Franz *1821 Osburg AARON Johann *e1738, +Osburg 1795 CONRATH Margaretha AARON Johann *<1755, Raum Wald von Kammerforst u1783 QUINT Margaretha AARON Johann *1781 Schweich 1800 ZIMMER Susanna AARON Margaretha *e1797, +Tawern 1821 ROHR Franz Anton AARON Maria Catharina *1805 Laudenbach AARON Matthias *1813 Schillingen AARON Susanna *u1806 Osburg 1844 GRÜNEWALD Nikolaus AARON Susanna Regina *u1824, +Rödelshütte ABACK Helena *1795 Geisfeld 1824 MOSER Michael ACHTEN Barbara *1847 Newel 1867 JUSTINGER Josef ACKERMANN Adam *1878 Schillingermühle ACKERMANN Anna *1848 Schillingermühle ACKERMANN Anna *1854 Schillingen 1879 WIRTZ Michael ACKERMANN Anna Maria *1797 Britten 1815 EVERHARDI Johann ACKERMANN Anna Maria *1833 Schillingen 1866 KAROS Matthias ACKERMANN Anna Maria *1875 Schillingermühle ACKERMANN Bernard *1741 Britten <1770 HECK Magdalena
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee
    Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories Compiled by S. Oldfield Edited by D. Procter and L.V. Fleming ISBN: 1 86107 502 2 © Copyright Joint Nature Conservation Committee 1999 Illustrations and layout by Barry Larking Cover design Tracey Weeks Printed by CLE Citation. Procter, D., & Fleming, L.V., eds. 1999. Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Disclaimer: reference to legislation and convention texts in this document are correct to the best of our knowledge but must not be taken to infer definitive legal obligation. Cover photographs Front cover: Top right: Southern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome (Richard White/JNCC). The world’s largest concentrations of southern rockhopper penguin are found on the Falkland Islands. Centre left: Down Rope, Pitcairn Island, South Pacific (Deborah Procter/JNCC). The introduced rat population of Pitcairn Island has successfully been eradicated in a programme funded by the UK Government. Centre right: Male Anegada rock iguana Cyclura pinguis (Glen Gerber/FFI). The Anegada rock iguana has been the subject of a successful breeding and re-introduction programme funded by FCO and FFI in collaboration with the National Parks Trust of the British Virgin Islands. Back cover: Black-browed albatross Diomedea melanophris (Richard White/JNCC). Of the global breeding population of black-browed albatross, 80 % is found on the Falkland Islands and 10% on South Georgia. Background image on front and back cover: Shoal of fish (Charles Sheppard/Warwick
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kansas–Nebraska
    The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 — http://edsitement.neh.gov/view_lesson_plan.asp?id=661 The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 Student Name ___________________________________________________ Date ________________ Sequential Entering of States and Territories from 1820 to 1854 Free or Slave Year Free Slave (by Popular Sovereignty) 1820 Maine 1821 Missouri 1836 Arkansas 1837 Michigan 1845 Texas Florida 1846 Iowa 1848 Wisconsin Oregon Territory 1849 Minnesota Territory 1850 California Utah Territory New Mexico Territory 1853 Washington Territory 1854 Kansas Territory Nebraska Territory 1. Permission is granted to educators to reproduce this worksheet for classroom use The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 — http://edsitement.neh.gov/view_lesson_plan.asp?id=661 The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 Student Name ___________________________________________________ Date ________________ Mapping the Controversy in 1854, Part I Using the interactive map (http://development.vbcomm.net/15332_NEH/#) answer the following questions: Question Answer Did free states and territories or slaveholding states have the most land area in 1854? (This can be calculated by adding together the square miles of all of the free states and territories, and then doing the same for the slave states. Compare the two numbers.) Which was more densely populated, the free states or the slave states? Where was the higher population of black people to be found? In what three southern states did the black population outnumber the white population? (In 1820 two southern states had a higher population of black people. Compare the 1820 map to the 1854 map to find out which southern state had experienced this rise in black population.) By 1854, how many states were free? How many states were slave states? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN)
    Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) ‐ Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Animals ‐ 2020 MOLLUSKS Common Name Scientific Name G‐Rank S‐Rank Federal Status State Status Mucket Actinonaias ligamentina G5 S1 Rayed Creekshell Anodontoides radiatus G3 S2 Western Fanshell Cyprogenia aberti G2G3Q SH Butterfly Ellipsaria lineolata G4G5 S1 Elephant‐ear Elliptio crassidens G5 S3 Spike Elliptio dilatata G5 S2S3 Texas Pigtoe Fusconaia askewi G2G3 S3 Ebonyshell Fusconaia ebena G4G5 S3 Round Pearlshell Glebula rotundata G4G5 S4 Pink Mucket Lampsilis abrupta G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Plain Pocketbook Lampsilis cardium G5 S1 Southern Pocketbook Lampsilis ornata G5 S3 Sandbank Pocketbook Lampsilis satura G2 S2 Fatmucket Lampsilis siliquoidea G5 S2 White Heelsplitter Lasmigona complanata G5 S1 Black Sandshell Ligumia recta G4G5 S1 Louisiana Pearlshell Margaritifera hembeli G1 S1 Threatened Threatened Southern Hickorynut Obovaria jacksoniana G2 S1S2 Hickorynut Obovaria olivaria G4 S1 Alabama Hickorynut Obovaria unicolor G3 S1 Mississippi Pigtoe Pleurobema beadleianum G3 S2 Louisiana Pigtoe Pleurobema riddellii G1G2 S1S2 Pyramid Pigtoe Pleurobema rubrum G2G3 S2 Texas Heelsplitter Potamilus amphichaenus G1G2 SH Fat Pocketbook Potamilus capax G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Inflated Heelsplitter Potamilus inflatus G1G2Q S1 Threatened Threatened Ouachita Kidneyshell Ptychobranchus occidentalis G3G4 S1 Rabbitsfoot Quadrula cylindrica G3G4 S1 Threatened Threatened Monkeyface Quadrula metanevra G4 S1 Southern Creekmussel Strophitus subvexus
    [Show full text]