Section 1 - Summary of Your Proposed Action
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
NSW Strategic Water Information and Monitoring Plan
NSW strategic water information and monitoring plan Water inventory and observation networks in New South Wales IMPORTANT NOTE During the preparation of this report, the following administrative changes occurred in the New South Wales Government: the Department of Water and Energy (DWE) was abolished and the functions relating to the administration of water legislation transferred to the Office of Water within the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (DECCW), previously the Department of Environment and Climate Change (DECC). The energy functions of DWE were transferred to the newly created Industry and Investment NSW, previously the Department of Primary Industries (DPI). References throughout this report are to the former agencies. Publisher NSW Office of Water Level 17, 227 Elizabeth Street GPO Box 3889 Sydney NSW 2001 T 02 8281 7777 F 02 8281 7799 [email protected] www.water.nsw.gov.au NSW strategic water information and monitoring plan. Water inventory and observation networks in New South Wales December 2009 ISBN 978 1 921546 94 5 Related publication NSW strategic water information and monitoring plan: Final report Published in December 2009 ISBN 978 1 921546 95 2 Acknowledgements Contributing agencies: NSW Office of Water (the Office), formerly Department of Water and Energy (DWE), Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (DECCW), formerly Department of Environment and Climate Change (DECC), Industry & Investment NSW, formerly Forests NSW in Department of Primary Industry (DPI), Sydney Catchment Authority This publication may be cited as: Malone D., Torrible L., Hayes J., 2009, NSW strategic water information and monitoring plan: Water inventory and observation networks in New South Wales, NSW Office of Water, Sydney. -
Tumut Shire Flood Emergency Sub Plan
Tumut Shire TUMUT SHIRE FLOOD EMERGENCY SUB PLAN A Sub-Plan of the Tumut Shire Council Local Emergency Management Plan (EMPLAN) Volume 1 of the Tumut Shire Local Flood Plan Tumut Shire Local Flood Plan AUTHORISATION The Tumut Shire Flood Emergency Sub Plan is a sub plan of the Tumut Shire Council Local Emergency Management Plan (EMPLAN). It has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the State Emergency Service Act 1989 (NSW) and is authorised by the Local Emergency Management Committee in accordance with the provisions of the State Emergency and Rescue Management Act 1989 (NSW). November 2013 Vol 1: Tumut Shire Flood Emergency Sub Plan Page i Tumut Shire Local Flood Plan CONTENTS AUTHORISATION .............................................................................................................................................. i CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................... iii DISTRIBUTION LIST ......................................................................................................................................... iv VERSION HISTORY ............................................................................................................................................ v AMENDMENT LIST .......................................................................................................................................... -
Downloaded 09/29/21 02:26 PM UTC 1714 JOURNAL of APPLIED METEOROLOGY and CLIMATOLOGY VOLUME 54
AUGUST 2015 T H E O B A L D E T A L . 1713 A Synoptic Classification of Inflow-Generating Precipitation in the Snowy Mountains, Australia ALISON THEOBALD AND HAMISH MCGOWAN Climate Research Group, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia JOHANNA SPEIRS Snowy Hydro, Ltd., Sydney, New South Wales, Australia NIK CALLOW Environmental Dynamics and Ecohydrology, School of Earth and Environment, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia (Manuscript received 24 October 2014, in final form 23 April 2015) ABSTRACT Precipitation falling in the Snowy Mountains region of southeastern Australia provides fuel for hydroelectric power generation and environmental flows along major river systems, as well as critical water resources for agricultural irrigation. A synoptic climatology of daily precipitation that triggers a quantifiable increase in streamflow in the headwater catchments of the Snowy Mountains region is presented for the period 1958–2012. Here, previous synoptic-meteorological studies of the region are extended by using a longer-term, year-round precipitation and reanalysis dataset combined with a novel, automated synoptic-classification technique. A three-dimensional representation of synoptic circulation is developed by effectively combining meteorological variables through the depth of the troposphere. Eleven distinct synoptic types are identified, describing key circulation features and moisture pathways that deliver precipitation to the Snowy Mountains. Synoptic types with the highest precipitation totals are commonly associated with moisture pathways originating from the northeast and northwest of Australia. These systems generate the greatest precipitation totals across the westerly and high-elevation areas of the Snowy Mountains, but precipitation is reduced in the eastern-elevation areas in the lee of the mountain ranges. -
Project Energyconnect Review of Economic Assessment
Project EnergyConnect Review of economic assessment 31 March 2021 Project EnergyConnect Review of economic assessment Copyright and Disclaimer Copyright in this material is owned by or licensed to ElectraNet. Permission to publish, modify, commercialise, or alter this material must be sought directly from ElectraNet. Reasonable endeavours have been used to ensure that the information contained in this report is accurate at the time of writing. However, ElectraNet gives no warranty and accepts no liability for any loss or damage incurred in reliance on this information. Revision Record Date Version Description Author Checked By Approved By 31 Mar 2021 1.0 For submission to the Brad Harrison Simon Appleby Rainer Korte AER and publication Hugo Klingenberg Page 1 of 12 Project EnergyConnect Review of economic assessment Project EnergyConnect material change in circumstances assessment Executive Summary On 14 September 2020, ElectraNet submitted an updated economic cost benefit analysis for Project EnergyConnect (PEC) to the AER for approval. The AER confirmed on 28 September 2020 that: “…the AER considers that the updated cost benefit analysis provides a not unreasonable basis for ElectraNet’s opinion that PEC remains the preferred option. We expect both ElectraNet and TransGrid to submit full and complete contingent project applications for PEC as soon as possible.” On 29 September 2020, the ElectraNet Board approved submission of a contingent project application (CPA) based on the AER’s confirmation and the CPA was submitted to the AER on 30 September 2020. This note reviews several subsequently announced policies and other changes in the National Electricity Market (NEM) and considers the impact that these could have on the benefits of PEC. -
Distribution Loss Factor Calculation Methodology Paper 2021-22
Distribution Loss Factor Calculation Methodology Paper March 2021 Distribution Loss Factor Calculation Methodology Paper March 2021 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Requirements of the National Electricity Rules .................................................................. 1 1.2 Ausgrid’s general approach in deriving non-site specific DLFs ......................................... 2 1.3 Energy entering the distribution network ............................................................................ 4 1.4 Energy exiting the distribution network .............................................................................. 4 1.5 Proposed approach to loss estimation for financial year 2021-22 ..................................... 4 2 BREAKDOWN OF TECHNICAL LOSSES ................................................................................. 5 2.1 Calculation of site specific loss factors............................................................................... 5 2.2 Calculation of loss load factors .......................................................................................... 5 2.3 Sub-transmission network series losses ............................................................................ 5 2.4 Sub-transmission network shunt losses ............................................................................. 5 2.5 High voltage network series losses ................................................................................... -
Network Vision 2056 Is Prepared and in All Cases, Anyone Proposing to Rely on Or Use Made Available Solely for Information Purposes
Disclaimer and copyright The Network Vision 2056 is prepared and In all cases, anyone proposing to rely on or use made available solely for information purposes. the information in this document should: Nothing in this document can be or should be taken as a recommendation in respect of any 1. Independently verify and check the currency, possible investment. accuracy, completeness, reliability and suitability of that information The information in this document reflects the forecasts, proposals and opinions adopted by 2. Independently verify and check the currency, TransGrid as at 30 June 2016 other than where accuracy, completeness, reliability and suitability otherwise specifically stated. Those forecasts, of reports relied on by TransGrid in preparing this proposals and opinions may change at any document time without warning. Anyone considering this 3. Obtain independent and specific advice from document at any date should independently seek appropriate experts or other sources the latest forecasts, proposals and opinions. Accordingly, TransGrid makes no representations This document includes information obtained or warranty as to the currency, accuracy, from the Australian Energy Market Operator reliability, completeness or suitability for particular (AEMO) and other sources. That information purposes of the information in this document. has been adopted in good faith without further enquiry or verification. Persons reading or utilising this Network Vision 2056 acknowledge and accept that TransGrid This document does not purport to contain all and/or its employees, agents and consultants of the information that AEMO, a prospective shall have no liability (including liability to any investor, Registered Participant or potential person by reason of negligence or negligent participant in the National Electricity Market misstatement) for any statements, opinions, (NEM), or any other person or Interested Parties information or matter (expressed or implied) may require for making decisions. -
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment ______
APPENDIX O ABORIGINAL CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT _____________________________________________________________________________ Snowy 2.0 Exploratory Works Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment Report Date: 20 July 2018 Author: Dr Julie Dibden NSW Archaeology Pty Ltd Proponent: Snowy Hydro Limited Local Government Area: Snowy Valleys & Snowy Monaro Regional Councils TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 9 1.1 THE PROJECT ...................................................................................................... 9 1.2 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT ..................................................................................10 1.3 LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY WORKS .................................................................10 1.4 PROPONENT .......................................................................................................12 1.5 ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS ...............................................12 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT – EXPLORATORY WORKS .......................14 2.1 THE EXPLORATORY WORKS.................................................................................14 2.2 EXPLORATORY TUNNEL......................................................................................15 2.3 PORTAL CONSTRUCTION COMPOUND .................................................................20 -
'Geo-Log' 2012
‘Geo-Log’ 2012 Journal of the Amateur Geological Society of the Hunter Valley ‘Geo-Log’ 2012 Journal of the Amateur Geological Society of the Hunter Valley Inc. Contents: President’s Introduction 2 Australian Alps Safari 3 New Hartley Excursion 20 Redhead Bluff: Stratigraphy and Paleoenvironment 29 Varved Shale in the Seaham and Raymond Terrace Area 33 Coolah Tops NP Weekend 37 Some Regional Geology of the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia: Geological Safari 2012 43 Geo-Log 2012 - Page 1 President’s Introduction. Hello members and friends, Yet again we have enjoyed a very successful year. Although the Society has been running for over 30 years, our membership has remained stable and has even increased slightly in recent years, reflecting a continuing enthusiasm for and appreciation of the earth sciences and related activities. A background in geology is not a prerequisite to membership and every member is strongly encouraged to take part regardless of their level of knowledge. Although the initial aim of the Society was the exploration and understanding of Hunter Valley geolo- gy, for several years now we have continued to widen our coverage well beyond the confines of the Valley. Even so, while the organizing committee tries to include new activities into the program each year, this is becoming more difficult. But new members bring new ideas and new experiences which everyone can benefit from. Occasionally old sites are revisited, either for the benefit of new members or where the availability of new information has allowed a greater understanding of earth history. Our first extended excursion was organized (with some trepidation) into the Flinders Ranges in 1995, but this was so successful that similar trips have since taken place annually. -
21 Years of EWON Then & Now
21 years of EWON then & now Annual Report 2018-2019 About this Report This Annual Report is published in accordance with the Energy & Water Ombudsman NSW (EWON) Charter and the Benchmarks for Industry-based Customer Dispute Resolution. The Benchmarks are Accessibility, Independence, Fairness, Accountability, Efficiency and Effectiveness. About our data Overview The data in this Report is drawn from The Energy & Water Ombudsman NSW (EWON) is an industry-based complaints received by EWON during the Ombudsman scheme which provides independent, free, informal dispute 2018/2019 financial year, unless otherwise resolution services to all NSW energy and some water customers. specified. EWON’s open complaint data varies We concentrate on achieving a fair and reasonable outcome for all in accordance with complaint progression complaints and all parties – we are not a consumer advocate, nor do we and figures in this Report reflect complaint represent industry. status as at 7 July 2019. We investigate a broad spectrum of complaints including: › disputed accounts › high bills About our case studies › disconnection or restriction of supply › payment difficulties Personal information about our customers has been changed to protect their privacy. › reliability and quality of supply › connection or transfer issues › contract terms This Report is printed on › marketing practices ecoStar Forest Stewardship Council© (FSC) certified › digital meter issues 100% recycled paper, using vegetable oil based inks and › poor customer service. an alcohol-free ISO 14001 certified printing process. Our principal responsibilities as set out in the EWON Charter are to: › handle energy and water complaints independently, fairly, informally, expeditiously and free of charge to the customer › promote EWON to consumers and small business › encourage and provide advice to members on good complaint- handling practices to assist in reducing and avoiding complaints. -
Transgrid’S 330 Kv Cable 41; • Reduced Rating of Ausgrid 132 Kv Cables; • the Uptake of Demand Management and Energy Efficiency in the Area; And
L Contingent Projects Contingent Project Powering Sydney’s Future Contingent Project Powering Sydney’s Future Contents 1.1 Background............................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Project Description .................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Trigger Event .......................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Project Requirement ............................................................................................... 5 1.5 Contingent Capital Expenditure............................................................................... 8 1.6 Demonstration of Rules Compliance ....................................................................... 9 Page 2 of 9 Contingent Project Powering Sydney’s Future Syd ey 1.1 Background ast The capability of the inner metropolitan supply network in Sydney is defined by the combined capacity of the parallel 330 kV and 132 kV networks. Theseu ga networks have been planned to operate in unison and designed to share the network load in proportion to their respective ratings. The existing G O transmission network of the Sydney inner metropolitan area is shown in Figure 1 belowa ga . O d ed Ca g o d Figure 1 Sydney Inner Metropolitan Area Transmission Network ac to Lane Cove 928, 929, 92L, 92M ) Holroyd 90V, (2) Mason 90W Park Dalley St Rozelle Strathfield 91A, 91B, 9S6, Pyrmont Chullora 91X, 91Y 9S9 90T, Haymarket Rookwood -
9/06/2021 Dr Kerry Schott AO Chair, Energy Security Board Lodged by Email: [email protected] Dear Dr Schott
ABN 70 250 995 390 180 Thomas Street, Sydney PO Box A1000 Sydney South NSW 1235 Australia T (02) 9284 3000 F (02) 9284 3456 9/06/2021 Dr Kerry Schott AO Chair, Energy Security Board Lodged by email: [email protected] Dear Dr Schott, Submission to the Energy Security Board’s post 2025 market design options paper We welcome the opportunity to respond to the Energy Security Board’s (ESB) post 2025 market design options paper. Australia is in the midst of an energy transition and the energy system is evolving at a rapid pace. TransGrid’s responsibility during this transition and beyond is to invest in, operate and manage our transmission network safely, securely and efficiently in the long-term interests of consumers. To this end, our Board has very recently made a Final Investment Decision to proceed with the construction of Project EnergyConnect (PEC), a high voltage interconnector between New South Wales and South Australia. We strongly support the work of the ESB to ensure that the National Electricity Market (NEM) design is fit for purpose and provides for a reliable and affordable supply of electricity to consumers. Our view is that it is essential that the post 2025 market design provides consumers with reliable and secure power at lower cost through: Ensuring that a centralised transmission network continues to be the backbone of the energy system - to enable efficiently located, large scale storage and renewable generation in the NEM. The connection of large scale renewable energy zones (REZs) to the grid as well as greater interconnection between the NEM regions will deliver this. -
Project Energyconnect: Updated Cost Benefit Analysis
PROJECT ENERGYCONNECT Updated Cost Benefit Analysis 30 September 2020 Project EnergyConnect: Updated Cost Benefit Analysis Copyright and Disclaimer Copyright in this material is owned by or licensed to ElectraNet. Permission to publish, modify, commercialise or alter this material must be sought directly from ElectraNet. Reasonable endeavours have been used to ensure that the information contained in this report is accurate at the time of writing. However, ElectraNet gives no warranty and accepts no liability for any loss or damage incurred in reliance on this information. Revision Record Date Version Description Author Checked By Approved By 9 Sep 2020 Final Final draft for AER review Brad Harrison Hugo Klingenberg Rainer Korte Draft Simon Appleby 30 Sep 2020 Final Final for publication Brad Harrison Simon Appleby Rainer Korte Page 2 of 35 Project EnergyConnect: Updated Cost Benefit Analysis Executive Summary Project EnergyConnect (PEC) is the proposed new 330 kV electricity interconnector between Robertstown in South Australia and Wagga Wagga in New South Wales that also includes a short 220 kV line from Buronga in New South Wales and Red Cliffs in northwest Victoria. ElectraNet completed the Regulatory Investment Test for Transmission (RIT-T) with the release of a Project Assessment Conclusion Report (PACR) on 13 February 2019, which concluded that Project EnergyConnect was the preferred option that satisfied the requirements of the RIT-T. On 24 January 2020 the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) issued a formal determination that found that ElectraNet had correctly identified Project EnergyConnect as the preferred option. The National Electricity Rules (NER) require ElectraNet to consider whether, in its reasonable opinion, there has been a “material change in circumstances” that might lead to a change in the preferred option and thereby potentially require reapplication of the RIT-T.