DOCSLIB.ORG

Humboldt County Transit Development Plan 2017-2022 Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Humboldt County Transit Development Plan 2017-2022 Draft Humboldt County Transit Development Plan Prepared For the 2017-2022 NEVADA COUNTYDraft TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PreparedPrepared for the by LSC Transportation Consultants Humboldt County Association of Governments This page left intentionally blank. Humboldt County 2017‐2022 Transit Development Plan DRAFT _________________________ Prepared for the Humboldt County Association of Governments 611 I Street, Suite B Eureka, CA 95501 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C P. O. Box 5875 Tahoe City, California 96145 November 8, 2017 LSC #177020 This page left intentionally blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2 Study Setting ........................................................................................................................................... 5 3 Existing Transit Services Overview ........................................................................................................ 21 4 Evaluation of Transit Services ............................................................................................................... 41 5 Transit Needs ........................................................................................................................................ 61 6 Service Alternatives Analysis ................................................................................................................. 67 7 Capital Requirements .......................................................................................................................... 117 8 Financial Considerations ..................................................................................................................... 131 9 Transit Development Plan ................................................................................................................... 139 10 SSTAC Strategic Plan ............................................................................................................................ 159 Appendix A – D: Bound Separately LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1 Historic Population of Humboldt County ................................................................................................ 7 2 Population Projections by Age Groups for Humboldt County ................................................................ 7 3 Humboldt County Population Characteristics by Census Tract ............................................................... 9 4 Humboldt County Commute Travel Characteristics .............................................................................. 11 5 Commuters Into and Out of Humboldt County Communities .............................................................. 13 6 Employment Location of Humboldt County Residents ......................................................................... 14 7 Top Humboldt County Employers ......................................................................................................... 15 8 Humboldt County Transit Fares ..................................................................................................... 23 ‐ 24 9 Humboldt County Transit Fleet Inventories .......................................................................................... 28 10 HTA Revenues ....................................................................................................................................... 42 11 HTA Operational and Administrative Expenses .................................................................................... 43 12 HTA Maintenance Expenses .................................................................................................................. 44 13 HTA Operating Statistics, Fiscal Year 2015 ‐16 ..................................................................................... 45 14 City of Arcata Transportation Expense Budgets ................................................................................... 48 Humboldt County Transit Development Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Fiscal Years 2017‐18 to 2021‐22 Page i 15 A&MRTS Annual TDA Performance Indicators ..................................................................................... 49 16 Fortuna Transit – Transit Budget ........................................................................................................... 50 17 Fortuna Transit Annual TDA Performance Indicators ........................................................................... 51 18 Blue Lake Rancheria Transit System Annual Operating Data ............................................................... 52 19 K‐T NET Annual Budget and 2015‐16 Performance .............................................................................. 54 20 K‐T NET Operating Characteristics by Month, FY 2015‐16 .................................................................... 55 21 Humboldt County Transit Providers Performance, FY 2015‐16 ............................................................ 56 22 Example Performance Standards for Humboldt County Providers ....................................................... 59 23 Onboard Surveys – Ranking of Service Attributes ................................................................................ 66 24 Arcata & Mad River Transit Service Alternatives Summary .................................................................. 68 25 Arcata Service Alternatives Performance Analysis .............................................................................. 76 26 HTA Cost Allocations ............................................................................................................................. 79 27 RTS Weekday Mainline Route – Passengers per Hour by Trip .............................................................. 81 28 Humboldt Transit Authority – Service Alternatives Summary .............................................................. 84 29 Estimated Average Saturday Ridership on Existing Routes Passing College of the Redwoods ............. 85 30 Southern Humboldt Ridership and Performance by Run – Sorted by Direction and Time ................... 93 31 Southern Humboldt Ridership and Performance by Run – Sorted by Run ........................................... 94 32 Example Southern Humboldt Transit Schedule Intercity Service Only ................................................. 94 33 Comparison of Southern Humboldt Intercity Schedule Times with Nearest RTS Schedule Time ......... 96 34 HTA Service Alternatives Performance Analysis ................................................................................... 98 35 Eureka Transit Service – Service Alternatives ..................................................................................... 105 36 ETS Service Alternatives Performance Analysis .................................................................................. 108 37 Arcata & Mad River Transit System Replacement Vehicle Needs....................................................... 121 38 HTA and ETS Replacement Vehicle Needs .......................................................................................... 122 39 Other Humboldt Transit Providers Replacement Vehicle Needs ........................................................ 123 40 Humboldt County Transportation Revenue Shares ............................................................................ 133 41 Peer Transit System Fares ................................................................................................................... 135 42 Arcata & Mad River Transit System Estimated Operating Cost .......................................................... 140 43 Arcata & Mad River Transit System Estimated Ridership ................................................................... 140 44 Arcata & Mad River Transit System Estimated Farebox Revenues ..................................................... 140 45 Humboldt Transit Authority Estimated Operating Cost ...................................................................... 143 46 Humboldt Transit Authority Estimated Ridership ............................................................................... 144 47 Humboldt Transit Authority Estimated Farebox Revenues ................................................................. 144 48 Financial Forecast for Fortuna Transit ................................................................................................ 147 49 Financial Forecast for K/T Net ............................................................................................................. 148 50 Arcata and Mad River Transit System Financial Plan .......................................................................... 152 51 Humboldt Transit Authority Financial Plan ......................................................................................... 156 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1 Humboldt County Site Map ..................................................................................................................... 6 LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Fiscal Year 2017‐18 to 2021‐22 Page ii Humboldt County Development Plan 2 Humboldt County Census Tracts ........................................................................................................... 10 3 Regional Routes Serving Humboldt County .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transportation Development Act Triennial Performance Audits
    TTAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Transportation Development Act Triennial Performance Audits MEETING DATE: December 1, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 5 STAFF CONTACT: Andrew Orfila, Peter Imhof RECOMMENDATION: Review and recommend that the Board approve the draft Triennial Performance Audits for FYs 2012/13-2014/15 for Santa Barbara Metropolitan Transit District (SBMTD), Santa Maria Area Transit (SMAT), City of Lompoc Transit (COLT), Santa Ynez Valley Transit (SYVT), City of Guadalupe Transit, Santa Barbara County Transit (Cuyama and Los Alamos), Easy Lift, the Santa Maria Organization of Transportation Helpers (SMOOTH), and SBCAG. SUMMARY: California Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 99246 requires regional transportation planning agencies (RTPAs) such as SBCAG to conduct performance audits every three years of its activities as well as the activities of the transit operators to which it allocates Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds. SBCAG allocates TDA funds to the Santa Barbara Metropolitan Transit District (MTD), Santa Maria Area Transit (SMAT), City of Lompoc Transit (COLT), Santa Ynez Valley Transit (SYVT), City of Guadalupe Transit, Santa Barbara County Transit (Cuyama and, until June 2013, Los Alamos Shuttle), Easy Lift, and the Santa Maria Organization of Transportation Helpers (SMOOTH). SBCAG contracted with Michael Baker International to conduct the TDA triennial performance audits for FYs 2012/13 through 2014/15. Michael Baker International reviewed compliance, implementation of prior audit recommendations, and agency functions, and made findings and recommendations for SBCAG and each of the transit operators. The findings and recommendations from the final draft audits of SBCAG and the transit operators are attached. TTAC is asked to review and recommend that the Board approve the triennial performance audits.
    [Show full text]
  • SB 1 Regional Fact Sheets
    TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS UNDERWAY IN THE EUREKA/ HUMBOLDT REGION Filling Potholes and Repaving roads PROJECTS FILLING 93 POTHOLES Pavement preservation project on nearly 78 miles of US 101 from AND REPAVING south of School Road to north of Big Lagoon Bridge near the City of CRUMBLING ROADS Trinidad in Humboldt County Pavement preservation project on nearly 37 miles of US 101 from Englewood Park Undercrossing to Eel River Bridge near Redcrest in PROJECTS Humboldt County 55 IMPROVING THE 31 projects rehabilitating local streets and roads in Siskiyou County SAFETY Nearly 6 miles of pavement improvements on two-lane road on OF LOCAL ROADS Lower Lake Road in the Fort Dick area in Del Norte County AND BRIDGES AND Pavement improvements on 25 miles on I-5 from the Sacramento River Bridge in the City of Dunsmuir to Black Butte Overhead in RELIEVING TRAFFIC Siskiyou County CONGESTION Pavement resealing and removal and replacement of failed roadway sections on various local streets in the City of Fort Jones Paving 13.5 miles of local roads in the City of Tulelake SAFETY IMPROVEMENT Rehabilitate and pavement improvements on local roads throughout PROJECTS FOR in the City of Eureka 9 PEDESTRIANS AND Improve approximately 20 miles of pavement on US 101 from north of Myers Flat to Newton Road in Humboldt County BICYCLISTS Paving of local streets and roads in the City of Arcata Resurface 2.3 miles of Myrtle Avenue in the unincorporated Eureka area of Humboldt County SB1 FUNDING FOR OUR Reconstruct entire length of Redwood Way in Humboldt County CITIES AND COUNTIES: 10-YEAR TOTAL Humboldt road safety County $91.6 million Install new traffi c signals at the intersection of Alma Street and Del Norte $18.2 Million North Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2018-19 SGR Project List
    2018-19 State Of Good Repair Approved Project List 2018-19 Recipient Sub-Recipient Project Title Estimated total SGR Allocation Amount* San Joaquin Council of Governments San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission - to Altamont Facility Upgrades and Improvements $256,937 Corridor Express (ACE) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority - to Facility Upgrades and Improvements $31,362 Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Alameda County Congestion Management Agency - to Facility Upgrades and Improvements $40,599 Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) San Joaquin Council of Governments San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority - to Altamont Facility Upgrades and Improvements $44 Corridor Express (ACE) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority - to Facility Upgrades and Capital Improvements $0 Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) San Joaquin Council of Governments San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission - to Altamont Railcar Midlife Overhaul $0 Corridor Express (ACE) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Metropolitan Transportation Commission Clipper®/Clipper® 2.0 $10,250,287 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District East Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) $3,053,265 Metropolitan Transportation Commission San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District STA SGR Preventative Maintenance $5,980,007 Metropolitan Transportation Commission City of San Francisco Muni Facility Rehabilitation Campaign $9,794,303 Metropolitan Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Intercommunity Transit Service
    STAFF REPORT TO: TTAC, NCTAC, SBCTAC SUBJECT: Intercommunity Transit Service MEETING DATE: May 4, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: 4 RECOMMENDATION: A. Recommend approval of final draft Intercommunity Transit Service Implementation Plan between Lompoc – VAFB – Santa Maria. B. Recommend selection of lease/purchase budget scenario for development of CMAQ application. C. Review and comment on draft, Memorandum of Understanding, between the cities of Santa Maria, Lompoc, the County of Santa Barbara, and the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments, Regarding Coordination of a Three-Year Pilot Project to Provide Regular, Fixed Route, Commuter Public Transportation Service between Lompoc and Santa Maria. DISCUSSION: Background Last month staff obtained input from various advisory committees such as TTAC (Technical Transportation Advisory Committee) North County Transit Advisory Committee (NCTAC), and the Santa Barbara County Transit Advisory Council (SBCTAC) on the draft Transit Service Implementation Plan. The North County Transit Advisory Committee met on March 30 and approved the draft plan with the recommendation that a bus leasing option be given priority consideration so the service is delivered expeditiously. The Santa Barbara County Transit Advisory Council met later that same day and recommended that a leasing option be given priority consideration so the service is delivered expeditiously and that a low – floor bus configuration be selected to facilitate use of the service by disabled users. TTAC met on April 1 and requested the following adjustments to the assumptions in the development of the final plan: re-examine fuel costs due to recent increase in fuel price, assess implications of schedule on driver needs due to likelihood of split shifts increasing costs, delete Lakeview SB stop, add a formal annual evaluation period, at the end of two years assess continuation of service based on performance standards, and increase costs for comparable ADA transit service option.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-19 State of Good Repair Approved Project List
    2018-19 State Of Good Repair Approved Project List 2018-19 Project Location Estimated total # Recipient Sub-Recipient Project Title Project Description City SGR Allocation Amount* 1 San Joaquin Council of Governments San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission - to Altamont Facility Upgrades and Improvements The Western Pacific Depot building, adjacent to the Robert Stockton Corridor Express (ACE) J. Cabral Station, is currently in a state of disrepair due to a fire. The building will be rehabilitated for future use by ACE $256,937 passengers and SJRRC employees. Metropolitan Transportation Commission Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority - to Facility Upgrades and Improvements The Western Pacific Depot building, adjacent to the Robert Stockton Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) J. Cabral Station, is currently in a state of disrepair due to a fire. The building will be rehabilitated for future use by ACE $31,362 passengers and SJRRC employees. Metropolitan Transportation Commission Alameda County Congestion Management Agency - to Facility Upgrades and Improvements The Western Pacific Depot building, adjacent to the Robert Stockton Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) J. Cabral Station, is currently in a state of disrepair due to a fire. The building will be rehabilitated for future use by ACE $40,599 passengers and SJRRC employees. San Joaquin Council of Governments San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority - to Altamont Facility Upgrades and Improvements The Western Pacific Depot building, adjacent to the Robert Stockton Corridor Express (ACE) J. Cabral Station, is currently in a state of disrepair due to a fire. The building will be rehabilitated for future use by ACE $44 passengers and SJRRC employees. 2 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Metropolitan Transportation Commission Clipper®/Clipper® 2.0 Replacement and modernization of the San Francisco Bay All 101 cities of the San Area's Clipper electronic transit fare payment system Francisco Bay Area $10,250,287 which is used by 22 transit operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Carbon Transit Operations Program FY 2017 - 2018 Payment Issue Date: 07/09/2018
    State Controller's Office Local Government Programs and Services Division Apportionment Payment Report with Offset Low Carbon Transit Operations Program FY 2017 - 2018 Payment Issue Date: 07/09/2018 Gross Claim Total Alameda Contra Costa Transit District $3,699,043.00 $3,699,043.00 Amador County Transportation $51,093.00 $51,093.00 Commission Antelope Valley Transit Authority $169,222.00 $169,222.00 ARVIN $88,259.00 $88,259.00 AUBURN $19,441.00 $19,441.00 BEAUMONT CITY TREASURER $62,517.00 $62,517.00 Butte County Association of $294,816.00 $294,816.00 Governments Calaveras Council of Governments $56,366.00 $56,366.00 Central Contra Costa Transit Authority $750,755.00 $750,755.00 City of Fresno $979,786.00 $979,786.00 City of Gardena $104,610.00 $104,610.00 City of Lompoc Transit $153,412.00 $153,412.00 City of Norwalk Transit $71,192.00 $71,192.00 City of Santa Maria $150,828.00 $150,828.00 City of Santa Monica Big Blue Bus $433,364.00 $433,364.00 City of Tulare $85,298.00 $85,298.00 CITY OF UNION CITY $141,630.00 $141,630.00 City of Visalia $380,991.00 $380,991.00 Gross Claim Total CLOVIS $156,444.00 $156,444.00 Colusa County Local Transportation $28,029.00 $28,029.00 Commission COMMERCE $41,174.00 $41,174.00 CORONA $179,276.00 $179,276.00 Council of San Benito County $71,288.00 $71,288.00 Governments County of Nevada Department of Public $105,645.00 $105,645.00 Works CULVER CITY $129,930.00 $129,930.00 DELANO $99,766.00 $99,766.00 Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority $437,912.00 $437,912.00 Eastern Sierra Transit Authority $66,155.00
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account Program Background
    Attachment 1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Annual Legislative Report Fiscal Year 2011-12 Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account Program Background The Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) Program was created by the passage of Proposition 1B, the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006. Of the $19,925 billion available to transportation, $4 billion dollars was allocated to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for intercity rail projects and for commuter or urban rail operators, bus operators, waterborne transit operators, or other transit operators in California. The PTMISEA Program will provide funding for rehabilitation, safety or modernization improvements, capital service enhancements or expansions, new capital projects, bus rapid transit improvements, or for rolling stock procurement, rehabilitation, or replacement, over a ten-year period. General obligation bond law requires the administrative agency to submit a report to the California State Legislature no later than January 1st each year. This requirement is found in California Government Code section 16724.4. In addition, this section states that the report shall contain: (1) A list of all projects and their geographical location that have been funded or are required or authorized to receive funds. (2) The amount of funds allocated on each project. (3) The status of any project required or authorized to be funded. Caltrans has established the Proposition 1B Bond Accountability website and has posted this information related to each project. Caltrans administered programs can be accessed from the Intercity Rail Improvement and the PTMISEA links at this address: www.bondaccountability.dot.ca.gov/bondacc/ Mass Transportation Program Proposition IB Bond Fund Of the $4 billion available in PTMISEA, $3.6 billion is to be allocated to transit operators over a ten-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast Network Integration Study
    Central Coast Network Integration Study San Luis Obispo--Moorpark Prepared for: Santa Barbara County Association of Governments DRAFT July 2021 LA19-3070.01 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1 Project Goals and Purpose ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Existing Services .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Challenges to Integrating Existing Services ....................................................................................................................... 3 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Existing Intercity Transit Service ................................................................................................. 6 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Regional and Intercity Transit Operators in the Study Area ....................................................................................... 8 Defining Regional and Intercity Transit Service for Network
    [Show full text]
  • Esplanade Mall Santa Barbara County Courthouse Goleta Hollister
    Transit Services of California and Nevada with connecting services in neighboring states Drain Reedsport LL-Fri LL-Fri LL-Mon Elkton Yoncalla Wells Creek Oakland Sutherlin Key LL-Fri B For detailed information on design choices and what services are or aren't included, see Lakeside Wilbur transitingla.wordpress.com/2018/03/06/california-transit-map North Bend Pony Village Mall Glide Idleyld Park Umpqua Community College LL-Thu This map is intended for reference purposes only. Please verify routes, schedules, and policies with carriers before travel! Map is not to scale. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This is an unofficial map which is not authorized by or affiliated with any public transportation provider. © 2018-2020 Transiting LA O Version 1.3.7, March 8, 2020 Hauser 1 2 3 For buses and ferries, color coding groups routes of same carrier 99 IC-L/H Stop served by lines 1, 2, and 3 Roseburg Stop served by lines 1 and 3 UTrans Green www.umpquatransit.com Gy Stop served by line 2 Coos County Area Transit (CCAT) Winston www.coostransit.org LL-Tue Dotted line: Limited/seasonal service on line 2 North Bend Newmark Center Dillard Coos Bay Tioga Hotel Thin black dotted line: Pedestrian connection Myrtle Creek Coos Bay 2nd/Central Tenmile Riddle 4 SCBEC Camas Valley Porter Creek Canyonville Dashed line: flex-route/on-demand service on line 4. Box encloses service area with multiple connection points to other lines. LL-Wed IC-MP/C CE Azalea Coquille Quail Trail Public Transit Glendale klamathtribes.org/ administration/bus-schedules
    [Show full text]
  • Low Carbon Transit Operations Program FY 2017 - 2018 Payment Issue Date: 08/09/2018
    State Controller's Office Local Government Programs and Services Division Apportionment Payment Report with Offset Low Carbon Transit Operations Program FY 2017 - 2018 Payment Issue Date: 08/09/2018 Gross Claim Total Alameda Contra Costa Transit District $0.00 $0.00 Amador County Transportation $0.00 $0.00 Commission Antelope Valley Transit Authority $0.00 $0.00 ARVIN $0.00 $0.00 AUBURN $0.00 $0.00 BEAUMONT CITY TREASURER $0.00 $0.00 Butte County Association of $0.00 $0.00 Governments Calaveras Council of Governments $0.00 $0.00 Central Contra Costa Transit Authority $0.00 $0.00 City of Fresno $0.00 $0.00 City of Gardena $0.00 $0.00 City of Lompoc Transit $0.00 $0.00 City of Norwalk Transit $0.00 $0.00 City of Santa Maria $0.00 $0.00 City of Santa Monica Big Blue Bus $0.00 $0.00 City of Tulare $0.00 $0.00 CITY OF UNION CITY $0.00 $0.00 City of Visalia $0.00 $0.00 Gross Claim Total CLOVIS $0.00 $0.00 Colusa County Local Transportation $0.00 $0.00 Commission COMMERCE $0.00 $0.00 CORONA $0.00 $0.00 Council of San Benito County $0.00 $0.00 Governments County of Nevada Department of Public $0.00 $0.00 Works CULVER CITY $0.00 $0.00 DELANO $0.00 $0.00 Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority $0.00 $0.00 Eastern Sierra Transit Authority $0.00 $0.00 El Dorado County Transit Authority $0.00 $0.00 ELK GROVE CITY TREASURER $0.00 $0.00 FAIRFIELD $0.00 $0.00 FOLSOM CITY TREASURER $0.00 $0.00 Foothill Transit $0.00 $0.00 Fresno County Rural Transit Agency $0.00 $0.00 Gold Coast Transit $0.00 $0.00 Golden Empire Transit District $0.00 $0.00 Golden Gate
    [Show full text]
  • Rta Board Agenda
    RTA BOARD AGENDA Wednesday, July 9, 2014 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ CHAMBER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1055 Monterey Street, San Luis Obispo, California 93401 RTA starts at 8:30 a.m. The AGENDA is available/posted at: http://www.slorta.org President: Shelly Higginbotham Vice President: Debbie Arnold Board Members: Frank Mecham (First District – SLO County) Tom O’Malley (Atascadero) Bruce Gibson (Second District – SLO County) Debbie Peterson (Grover Beach) Adam Hill (Third District – SLO County) Jamie Irons (Morro Bay) Caren Ray (Fourth District – SLO County) Fred Strong (Paso Robles) Debbie Arnold (Fifth District – SLO County) Shelly Higginbotham (Pismo Beach) Tony Ferrara (Arroyo Grande) Jan Howell Marx (San Luis Obispo) Individuals wishing accessibility accommodations at this meeting under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) may request such accommodations to aid hearing, visual, or mobility impairment by contacting the SLORTA offices at 781- 4472. Please note that 48 hours advance notice will be necessary to honor a request. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS: This portion of the agenda is reserved for any members of the public to directly address the San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (RTA) Board on any items not on the agenda and within the jurisdiction of the Board. Comments are limited to three minutes per speaker. The Board will listen to all communication, but in compliance with the Brown Act, will not take any action on items that are not on the agenda. A. INFORMATION AGENDA A-1 Executive Director’s Report (Information) A-3 Introduce Potential Runabout Fare Program Changes (Information) B. ACTION AGENDA B-1 RTA FY15 Budget Amendment (Approve) B-2 “Dunk Your Kicks” for Day Pass benefiting the Max Cure Foundation (Approve) B-3 Strategic Business Plan Updated (Approve) C.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Public Transit-Human Service Transportation
    November 15, 2007 This page intentionally left blank Transportation Connections Project Staff Jim Kemp EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Michael G. Powers DEPUTY DIRECTOR, Planning Sarkes Khachek TRANSPORTATION PLANNER This page intentionally left blank Santa Barbara County Association of Governments 260 N. San Antonio, Suite B Santa Barbara, CA 93110 (805) 961-8900 www.sbcag.org 2007 MEMBERSHIP ROSTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS SUPERVISORS Member Supervisorial District SALUD CARBAJAL FIRST DISTRICT JANET WOLF SECOND DISTRICT BROOKS FIRESTONE (Vice-Chair) THIRD DISTRICT JONI GRAY FOURTH DISTRICT JOE CENTENO FIFTH DISTRICT CITIES Member Alternate BUELLTON RUSS HICKS DIANE WHITEHAIR Councilmember Mayor CARPINTERIA JOE ARMENDARIZ AL CLARK Councilmember Councilmember GOLETA JONNY WALLIS (Chair) MICHAEL T. BENNETT Councilmember Councilmember GUADALUPE LUPE ALVAREZ JOHN SABEDRA Mayor Councilmember LOMPOC DICK DEWEES ANN RUHGE Mayor Councilmember SANTA BARBARA MARTY BLUM IYA FALCONE Mayor Councilmember SANTA MARIA LARRY LAVAGNINO BOB ORACH Mayor Councilmember SOLVANG JIM RICHARDSON LINDA JACKSON Councilmember Councilmember EX-OFFICIO (NON-VOTING) MEMBERS CALTRANS DISTRICT 5 RICH KRUMHOLZ 15TH SENATE DISTRICT ABEL MALDONADO 19TH SENATE DISTRICT TOM MCCLINTOCK 33RD ASSEMBLY DISTRICT SAM BLAKESLEE 35TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT PEDRO NAVA This page intentionally left blank With Special Recognition - Santa Barbara County Transit Advisory Council (SBCTAC) Polly Bleavins Children and Families Commission (North County) (Community outreach) David Damiano
    [Show full text]