Transportation Emergency Preparedness Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transportation Emergency Preparedness Plan TRANSPORTATION EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN Prepared by Claris Strategy Terra Firma Enterprises CPARS Consulting December 17, 2020 WARNING: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Information contained in this document is exempt from FOIA (Exemption 2). Any authorized individual who knowingly or recklessly divulges information from this document may Be imprisoned for one year, fined or Both. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This final plan generously funded by the California Department of Transportation Adaptation Planning Grant Program. We would like to thank the Advisory Committee for their participation, feedback and time contributed throughout the process. We would also like to thank the stakeholders, transit riders and public who participated in the outreach survey. Finally, we like to thank all community members of Santa Barbara ad Ventura Counties. iii | Transportation Emergency Preparedness Plan | December 17, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Foreword 3 1.2 How to use the TEPP 3 1.3 Planning Assumptions and Considerations 4 1.4 Purpose 4 1.5 Objectives 5 1.6 Scope and Applicability 5 1.7 Authorities, Requirements and Regulations 5 1.8 Approval and Promulgation 6 1.9 Maintenance of Plan 6 1.10 Public Awareness and Education 6 1.11 ADA Considerations 7 1.12 Training, Exercises and Improvement Plan 7 1.13 Distribution List / Department and Agency Concurrence 7 2.0 SECTION TWO: SANTA BARBARA AND VENTURA COUNTIES OVERVIEW 11 2.1 Transportation Infrastructure for Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties 13 2.2 Vulnerable Populations 24 2.3 Threat Summaries 26 2.4 Prioritization of Threats That May Impact Transportation 37 3.0 SECTION THREE: CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS 41 3.1 Organization 41 3.2 Activation Procedures 48 3.3 Communications 55 3.4 Facilities 56 4.0 SECTION FOUR: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 59 4.1 Local and Regional Government Agencies 59 4.2 State Agencies 62 4.3 Federal Government 63 4.4 Multi-Agency Coordination 64 4.5 Business Stakeholders 65 4.6 Community Stakeholders 65 4.7 VCTC/SBCAG Roles during County/OA EOC Activations 67 5.0 SECTION FIVE: RESPONSE OPERATIONS 75 5.1 VCTC/SBCAG Response Operations 75 5.2 Bi-County Response Operations 76 5.3 Activation (Level 1, 2, and 3) 76 5.4 Bi-County Decision-Making 77 5.5 Requesting Bi-County Transportation Resources 78 5.6 Mutual Aid 79 5.7 Bi-County Response Communications 79 | iv 5.8 County/Operational Area EOCs Incident and Transportation Priorities 80 5.9 Evacuations 82 5.10 Alternatives to Traditional Modes of Transportation when not Available 87 6.0 SECTION SIX: MUTUAL AID/MUTUAL ASSISTANCE/MEMORANDUMS OF UNDERSTANDING 91 6.1 Local Mutual Aid/Mutual Assistance 92 6.2 Memorandums of Understanding/Memorandums of Agreement (MOA) 92 7.0 SECTION SEVEN: EOC POSITION CHECKLISTS 97 7.1 Common EOC Responsibilities 97 7.2 MAC Group Member 99 7.3 Transportation Seat as an Agency Representative 103 7.4 Transportation Seat under Care and Shelter Branch in the Operations Section 107 7.5 Transportation Seat as Co-Lead of Transportation Unit in the Logistics 111 7.6 TOC Director in VCTC/SBCAG TOC 115 7.7 PIO in VCTC/SBCAG TOC 119 7.8 Liaison Officer in VCTC/SBCAG TOC 123 7.9 Safety/Security Officer in VCTC/SBCAG TOC 125 7.10 Operations Section Coordinator VCTC/SBCAG TOC 127 7.11 Planning/Intelligence Section Coordinator VCTC/SBCAG TOC 129 7.12 Logistics Section Coordinator VCTC/SBCAG TOC 131 7.13 Finance/Administration Section Coordinator VCTC/SBCAG TOC 133 APPENDICES 137 Appendix A: SBCAG TEPP Assignments 137 Appendix B: VCTC TEPP Assignments 139 Appendix C: Transit Operators Checklist 141 Appendix D: Public Information Officer Support Documents 145 Appendix E: Access and Functional Needs Considerations Support Documents 151 Appendix F: TOC Action Planning Support Documents 155 Appendix G: Emergency Accounting Support Documentation 159 Appendix H: EOC Change of Shift Briefing Form 161 Appendix I: EOC Check-In Form 163 Appendix J: Activity Log (ICS 214) Form 165 Appendix K: EOC Action Plan Form (TOC for VCTC/SBCAG) 167 Appendix L: SBCAG Transit Summary Status Form 173 Appendix M: VCTC Transit Summary Status Form 175 Appendix N: Resource Request Form 177 Appendix O: County/OA EOC Activation Levels and VCTC/SBCAG Tasks 179 Appendix P: Santa Barbara Transportation Contacts 181 Appendix Q: Santa Barbara Transit Vehicles 183 Appendix R: Ventura County Transportation Contacts 185 Appendix S: Ventura County Transit Vehicles 187 v | Transportation Emergency Preparedness Plan | December 17, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix T: Other Santa Barbara County and Ventura County Essential Contacts 189 Appendix U: List of Acronyms and Abbreviations 191 Appendix V: Glossary of Terms 195 Appendix W: Authorities and References 205 Appendix Y: Advisory Committee and Stakeholder Group 207 ANNEXES 213 Annex A: Disaster Reimbursement 213 Annex B: Continuity of Operations 249 Annex C: Training and Exercises 253 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3-1 SEMS Levels 42 Figure 3-2 Five Functions within SEMS 43 Figure 3-3 Santa Barbara County Operational Area EOC Organization 44 Figure 3-4 Ventura County Operational Area EOC Organization 44 Figure 3-5 Transportation Seat as an Agency Representative 45 Figure 3-6 Transportation Seat as Part of the Operations Section 46 Figure 3-7 Transportation Seat as Part of the Logistics Section 47 Figure 3-8 VCTC/SBCAG TOC 48 Figure 3-9 Level 4 (Option 1) - Monitoring Level City, County and VCTC/SBCAG relationships 50 Figure 3-10 Level 4 (Option 2) - Monitoring Level City, County and VCTC/SBCAG relationships 50 Figure 3-11 Level 3 - Enhanced Operations, Option 1 51 Figure 3-12 Level 3 - Enhanced Operations, Option 2 52 Figure 3-13 Level 2 - Partial EOC Activation 53 Figure 3-14 Level 1 - Full Activation 54 Figure 3-15 Bi-County Activation 55 Figure 4-1 Levels of Multi-Agency Coordination 66 Figure 4-2 Positions VCTC/SBCAG may fill in a County/OA EOC 68 Figure 4-3 VCTC/SBCAG TOC Positions 70 Figure 4-4 VCTC/SBCAG Multi-Level Coordination 71 Figure 5-1 Key Functions in an Emergency 76 Figure 5-2 Transportation Priorities in an Emergency 81 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 Highways/Freeways Serving Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties 13 Table 2-2 Santa Barbara/Ventura Airports 16 Table 2-3 Percentages of Vulnerable Populations 26 Table 2-4 Hazards and Hazard Rankings 38 Table 3-1 County/OA EOC Activation Levels 49 Table 4-1 VCTC/SBCAG TOC Roles 67 Table 4-2 VCTC/SBCAG TOC Roles 68 Table 5-1 County/OA EOC Activation Levels and VCTC/SBCAG Tasks1 75 Table 5-2 Lead Agencies and Coordinating Agencies for Operational Area Evacuations 84 | vi This page intentionally left blank. vii | Transportation Emergency Preparedness Plan | December 17, 2020 SECTION ONE INTRODUCTION 1 This page intentionally left blank. 2 | Transportation Emergency Preparedness Plan | December 17, 2020 SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION 1.0 SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Foreword This Plan was developed by the Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC) and the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG), with funding from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), to address the transportation challenges related to disasters that affect one or both counties. This bi-county plan outlines: • Roles and responsibilities of transit providers, emergency response agencies, government and non-governmental organizations • Communication procedures • Summarizes transit resources Ventura and Santa Barbara counties are highly vulnerable to both natural hazards and human-caused disasters, such as earthquakes, fires and post-fire debris flows, flooding, transportation accidents, and other incidents that may impact not only the critical infrastructures, as well as the livelihood of businesses and residents in both counties. Past disasters have affected the transportation infrastructure between these two counties limiting the flow of goods and services and commuters traveling to and from work, medical appointments, family and other important activities. The main rail and highway thoroughfares between these two counties have a repeated occurrence of closures due to fires (Jesusita 2009, Sherpa 2016, Thomas 2017, Hill 2018, Woolsey 2018 and Gaviota 2019), floods (1969, 1980, 1995, and 1998), and landslides and debris flows (La Conchita 1995 and 2005 and Montecito 2018). Other disasters include the 1928 St. Francis Dam Failure and the 1991 Sea Cliff Train Derailment. This Transportation Emergency Preparedness Plan (TEPP) was developed in accordance with the National Incident Management System (NIMS), the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS), the Master Mutual Aid Agreement, the California State Emergency Plan, the Santa Barbara Operational Area Emergency Management Plan, the County of Ventura Emergency Operations Plan, and relevant mutual aid plans. This plan does not supersede or exclude any of these concepts or plans; but rather, it places them in the context of a response to an event that may affect one or both of the counties during which time Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs) are activated and the transportation infrastructure is affected or transit resources are needed. This plan does not address normal day-to-day emergencies or the well-established and routine procedures used in coping with such emergencies. This TEPP builds on California’s existing SEMS through better definition of bi-county components of that system including coordination across disciplines and levels of government, resource sharing, and bi- county decision-making. Development of this plan was a collaborative effort among VCTC, SBCAG, Santa Barbara County, Ventura County, transit providers, and over 40 local, state, federal and non- governmental organizations. For a complete listing of the Advisory Committee and Stakeholder Group, please refer to Appendix Y: Advisory Committee and Stakeholder Group of this plan. 1.2 How to use the TEPP The TEPP is a bi-county plan that is to be used by VCTC/SBCAG, Ventura County Sheriff’s Office of Emergency Services (OES)/Santa Barbara County Office of Emergency Management (OEM) and transit agencies for incidents that may need transportation services support beyond normal operations and services.
Recommended publications
  • Transportation Development Act Triennial Performance Audits
    TTAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Transportation Development Act Triennial Performance Audits MEETING DATE: December 1, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 5 STAFF CONTACT: Andrew Orfila, Peter Imhof RECOMMENDATION: Review and recommend that the Board approve the draft Triennial Performance Audits for FYs 2012/13-2014/15 for Santa Barbara Metropolitan Transit District (SBMTD), Santa Maria Area Transit (SMAT), City of Lompoc Transit (COLT), Santa Ynez Valley Transit (SYVT), City of Guadalupe Transit, Santa Barbara County Transit (Cuyama and Los Alamos), Easy Lift, the Santa Maria Organization of Transportation Helpers (SMOOTH), and SBCAG. SUMMARY: California Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 99246 requires regional transportation planning agencies (RTPAs) such as SBCAG to conduct performance audits every three years of its activities as well as the activities of the transit operators to which it allocates Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds. SBCAG allocates TDA funds to the Santa Barbara Metropolitan Transit District (MTD), Santa Maria Area Transit (SMAT), City of Lompoc Transit (COLT), Santa Ynez Valley Transit (SYVT), City of Guadalupe Transit, Santa Barbara County Transit (Cuyama and, until June 2013, Los Alamos Shuttle), Easy Lift, and the Santa Maria Organization of Transportation Helpers (SMOOTH). SBCAG contracted with Michael Baker International to conduct the TDA triennial performance audits for FYs 2012/13 through 2014/15. Michael Baker International reviewed compliance, implementation of prior audit recommendations, and agency functions, and made findings and recommendations for SBCAG and each of the transit operators. The findings and recommendations from the final draft audits of SBCAG and the transit operators are attached. TTAC is asked to review and recommend that the Board approve the triennial performance audits.
    [Show full text]
  • SB 1 Regional Fact Sheets
    TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS UNDERWAY IN THE EUREKA/ HUMBOLDT REGION Filling Potholes and Repaving roads PROJECTS FILLING 93 POTHOLES Pavement preservation project on nearly 78 miles of US 101 from AND REPAVING south of School Road to north of Big Lagoon Bridge near the City of CRUMBLING ROADS Trinidad in Humboldt County Pavement preservation project on nearly 37 miles of US 101 from Englewood Park Undercrossing to Eel River Bridge near Redcrest in PROJECTS Humboldt County 55 IMPROVING THE 31 projects rehabilitating local streets and roads in Siskiyou County SAFETY Nearly 6 miles of pavement improvements on two-lane road on OF LOCAL ROADS Lower Lake Road in the Fort Dick area in Del Norte County AND BRIDGES AND Pavement improvements on 25 miles on I-5 from the Sacramento River Bridge in the City of Dunsmuir to Black Butte Overhead in RELIEVING TRAFFIC Siskiyou County CONGESTION Pavement resealing and removal and replacement of failed roadway sections on various local streets in the City of Fort Jones Paving 13.5 miles of local roads in the City of Tulelake SAFETY IMPROVEMENT Rehabilitate and pavement improvements on local roads throughout PROJECTS FOR in the City of Eureka 9 PEDESTRIANS AND Improve approximately 20 miles of pavement on US 101 from north of Myers Flat to Newton Road in Humboldt County BICYCLISTS Paving of local streets and roads in the City of Arcata Resurface 2.3 miles of Myrtle Avenue in the unincorporated Eureka area of Humboldt County SB1 FUNDING FOR OUR Reconstruct entire length of Redwood Way in Humboldt County CITIES AND COUNTIES: 10-YEAR TOTAL Humboldt road safety County $91.6 million Install new traffi c signals at the intersection of Alma Street and Del Norte $18.2 Million North Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2018-19 SGR Project List
    2018-19 State Of Good Repair Approved Project List 2018-19 Recipient Sub-Recipient Project Title Estimated total SGR Allocation Amount* San Joaquin Council of Governments San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission - to Altamont Facility Upgrades and Improvements $256,937 Corridor Express (ACE) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority - to Facility Upgrades and Improvements $31,362 Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Alameda County Congestion Management Agency - to Facility Upgrades and Improvements $40,599 Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) San Joaquin Council of Governments San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority - to Altamont Facility Upgrades and Improvements $44 Corridor Express (ACE) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority - to Facility Upgrades and Capital Improvements $0 Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) San Joaquin Council of Governments San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission - to Altamont Railcar Midlife Overhaul $0 Corridor Express (ACE) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Metropolitan Transportation Commission Clipper®/Clipper® 2.0 $10,250,287 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District East Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) $3,053,265 Metropolitan Transportation Commission San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District STA SGR Preventative Maintenance $5,980,007 Metropolitan Transportation Commission City of San Francisco Muni Facility Rehabilitation Campaign $9,794,303 Metropolitan Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Intercommunity Transit Service
    STAFF REPORT TO: TTAC, NCTAC, SBCTAC SUBJECT: Intercommunity Transit Service MEETING DATE: May 4, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: 4 RECOMMENDATION: A. Recommend approval of final draft Intercommunity Transit Service Implementation Plan between Lompoc – VAFB – Santa Maria. B. Recommend selection of lease/purchase budget scenario for development of CMAQ application. C. Review and comment on draft, Memorandum of Understanding, between the cities of Santa Maria, Lompoc, the County of Santa Barbara, and the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments, Regarding Coordination of a Three-Year Pilot Project to Provide Regular, Fixed Route, Commuter Public Transportation Service between Lompoc and Santa Maria. DISCUSSION: Background Last month staff obtained input from various advisory committees such as TTAC (Technical Transportation Advisory Committee) North County Transit Advisory Committee (NCTAC), and the Santa Barbara County Transit Advisory Council (SBCTAC) on the draft Transit Service Implementation Plan. The North County Transit Advisory Committee met on March 30 and approved the draft plan with the recommendation that a bus leasing option be given priority consideration so the service is delivered expeditiously. The Santa Barbara County Transit Advisory Council met later that same day and recommended that a leasing option be given priority consideration so the service is delivered expeditiously and that a low – floor bus configuration be selected to facilitate use of the service by disabled users. TTAC met on April 1 and requested the following adjustments to the assumptions in the development of the final plan: re-examine fuel costs due to recent increase in fuel price, assess implications of schedule on driver needs due to likelihood of split shifts increasing costs, delete Lakeview SB stop, add a formal annual evaluation period, at the end of two years assess continuation of service based on performance standards, and increase costs for comparable ADA transit service option.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-19 State of Good Repair Approved Project List
    2018-19 State Of Good Repair Approved Project List 2018-19 Project Location Estimated total # Recipient Sub-Recipient Project Title Project Description City SGR Allocation Amount* 1 San Joaquin Council of Governments San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission - to Altamont Facility Upgrades and Improvements The Western Pacific Depot building, adjacent to the Robert Stockton Corridor Express (ACE) J. Cabral Station, is currently in a state of disrepair due to a fire. The building will be rehabilitated for future use by ACE $256,937 passengers and SJRRC employees. Metropolitan Transportation Commission Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority - to Facility Upgrades and Improvements The Western Pacific Depot building, adjacent to the Robert Stockton Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) J. Cabral Station, is currently in a state of disrepair due to a fire. The building will be rehabilitated for future use by ACE $31,362 passengers and SJRRC employees. Metropolitan Transportation Commission Alameda County Congestion Management Agency - to Facility Upgrades and Improvements The Western Pacific Depot building, adjacent to the Robert Stockton Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) J. Cabral Station, is currently in a state of disrepair due to a fire. The building will be rehabilitated for future use by ACE $40,599 passengers and SJRRC employees. San Joaquin Council of Governments San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority - to Altamont Facility Upgrades and Improvements The Western Pacific Depot building, adjacent to the Robert Stockton Corridor Express (ACE) J. Cabral Station, is currently in a state of disrepair due to a fire. The building will be rehabilitated for future use by ACE $44 passengers and SJRRC employees. 2 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Metropolitan Transportation Commission Clipper®/Clipper® 2.0 Replacement and modernization of the San Francisco Bay All 101 cities of the San Area's Clipper electronic transit fare payment system Francisco Bay Area $10,250,287 which is used by 22 transit operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Humboldt County Transit Development Plan 2017-2022 Draft
    Humboldt County Transit Development Plan Prepared For the 2017-2022 NEVADA COUNTYDraft TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PreparedPrepared for the by LSC Transportation Consultants Humboldt County Association of Governments This page left intentionally blank. Humboldt County 2017‐2022 Transit Development Plan DRAFT _________________________ Prepared for the Humboldt County Association of Governments 611 I Street, Suite B Eureka, CA 95501 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C P. O. Box 5875 Tahoe City, California 96145 November 8, 2017 LSC #177020 This page left intentionally blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2 Study Setting ........................................................................................................................................... 5 3 Existing Transit Services Overview ........................................................................................................ 21 4 Evaluation of Transit Services ............................................................................................................... 41 5 Transit Needs ........................................................................................................................................ 61 6 Service Alternatives Analysis ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Low Carbon Transit Operations Program FY 2017 - 2018 Payment Issue Date: 07/09/2018
    State Controller's Office Local Government Programs and Services Division Apportionment Payment Report with Offset Low Carbon Transit Operations Program FY 2017 - 2018 Payment Issue Date: 07/09/2018 Gross Claim Total Alameda Contra Costa Transit District $3,699,043.00 $3,699,043.00 Amador County Transportation $51,093.00 $51,093.00 Commission Antelope Valley Transit Authority $169,222.00 $169,222.00 ARVIN $88,259.00 $88,259.00 AUBURN $19,441.00 $19,441.00 BEAUMONT CITY TREASURER $62,517.00 $62,517.00 Butte County Association of $294,816.00 $294,816.00 Governments Calaveras Council of Governments $56,366.00 $56,366.00 Central Contra Costa Transit Authority $750,755.00 $750,755.00 City of Fresno $979,786.00 $979,786.00 City of Gardena $104,610.00 $104,610.00 City of Lompoc Transit $153,412.00 $153,412.00 City of Norwalk Transit $71,192.00 $71,192.00 City of Santa Maria $150,828.00 $150,828.00 City of Santa Monica Big Blue Bus $433,364.00 $433,364.00 City of Tulare $85,298.00 $85,298.00 CITY OF UNION CITY $141,630.00 $141,630.00 City of Visalia $380,991.00 $380,991.00 Gross Claim Total CLOVIS $156,444.00 $156,444.00 Colusa County Local Transportation $28,029.00 $28,029.00 Commission COMMERCE $41,174.00 $41,174.00 CORONA $179,276.00 $179,276.00 Council of San Benito County $71,288.00 $71,288.00 Governments County of Nevada Department of Public $105,645.00 $105,645.00 Works CULVER CITY $129,930.00 $129,930.00 DELANO $99,766.00 $99,766.00 Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority $437,912.00 $437,912.00 Eastern Sierra Transit Authority $66,155.00
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account Program Background
    Attachment 1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Annual Legislative Report Fiscal Year 2011-12 Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account Program Background The Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) Program was created by the passage of Proposition 1B, the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006. Of the $19,925 billion available to transportation, $4 billion dollars was allocated to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for intercity rail projects and for commuter or urban rail operators, bus operators, waterborne transit operators, or other transit operators in California. The PTMISEA Program will provide funding for rehabilitation, safety or modernization improvements, capital service enhancements or expansions, new capital projects, bus rapid transit improvements, or for rolling stock procurement, rehabilitation, or replacement, over a ten-year period. General obligation bond law requires the administrative agency to submit a report to the California State Legislature no later than January 1st each year. This requirement is found in California Government Code section 16724.4. In addition, this section states that the report shall contain: (1) A list of all projects and their geographical location that have been funded or are required or authorized to receive funds. (2) The amount of funds allocated on each project. (3) The status of any project required or authorized to be funded. Caltrans has established the Proposition 1B Bond Accountability website and has posted this information related to each project. Caltrans administered programs can be accessed from the Intercity Rail Improvement and the PTMISEA links at this address: www.bondaccountability.dot.ca.gov/bondacc/ Mass Transportation Program Proposition IB Bond Fund Of the $4 billion available in PTMISEA, $3.6 billion is to be allocated to transit operators over a ten-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast Network Integration Study
    Central Coast Network Integration Study San Luis Obispo--Moorpark Prepared for: Santa Barbara County Association of Governments DRAFT July 2021 LA19-3070.01 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1 Project Goals and Purpose ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Existing Services .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Challenges to Integrating Existing Services ....................................................................................................................... 3 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Existing Intercity Transit Service ................................................................................................. 6 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Regional and Intercity Transit Operators in the Study Area ....................................................................................... 8 Defining Regional and Intercity Transit Service for Network
    [Show full text]
  • Esplanade Mall Santa Barbara County Courthouse Goleta Hollister
    Transit Services of California and Nevada with connecting services in neighboring states Drain Reedsport LL-Fri LL-Fri LL-Mon Elkton Yoncalla Wells Creek Oakland Sutherlin Key LL-Fri B For detailed information on design choices and what services are or aren't included, see Lakeside Wilbur transitingla.wordpress.com/2018/03/06/california-transit-map North Bend Pony Village Mall Glide Idleyld Park Umpqua Community College LL-Thu This map is intended for reference purposes only. Please verify routes, schedules, and policies with carriers before travel! Map is not to scale. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. This is an unofficial map which is not authorized by or affiliated with any public transportation provider. © 2018-2020 Transiting LA O Version 1.3.7, March 8, 2020 Hauser 1 2 3 For buses and ferries, color coding groups routes of same carrier 99 IC-L/H Stop served by lines 1, 2, and 3 Roseburg Stop served by lines 1 and 3 UTrans Green www.umpquatransit.com Gy Stop served by line 2 Coos County Area Transit (CCAT) Winston www.coostransit.org LL-Tue Dotted line: Limited/seasonal service on line 2 North Bend Newmark Center Dillard Coos Bay Tioga Hotel Thin black dotted line: Pedestrian connection Myrtle Creek Coos Bay 2nd/Central Tenmile Riddle 4 SCBEC Camas Valley Porter Creek Canyonville Dashed line: flex-route/on-demand service on line 4. Box encloses service area with multiple connection points to other lines. LL-Wed IC-MP/C CE Azalea Coquille Quail Trail Public Transit Glendale klamathtribes.org/ administration/bus-schedules
    [Show full text]
  • Low Carbon Transit Operations Program FY 2017 - 2018 Payment Issue Date: 08/09/2018
    State Controller's Office Local Government Programs and Services Division Apportionment Payment Report with Offset Low Carbon Transit Operations Program FY 2017 - 2018 Payment Issue Date: 08/09/2018 Gross Claim Total Alameda Contra Costa Transit District $0.00 $0.00 Amador County Transportation $0.00 $0.00 Commission Antelope Valley Transit Authority $0.00 $0.00 ARVIN $0.00 $0.00 AUBURN $0.00 $0.00 BEAUMONT CITY TREASURER $0.00 $0.00 Butte County Association of $0.00 $0.00 Governments Calaveras Council of Governments $0.00 $0.00 Central Contra Costa Transit Authority $0.00 $0.00 City of Fresno $0.00 $0.00 City of Gardena $0.00 $0.00 City of Lompoc Transit $0.00 $0.00 City of Norwalk Transit $0.00 $0.00 City of Santa Maria $0.00 $0.00 City of Santa Monica Big Blue Bus $0.00 $0.00 City of Tulare $0.00 $0.00 CITY OF UNION CITY $0.00 $0.00 City of Visalia $0.00 $0.00 Gross Claim Total CLOVIS $0.00 $0.00 Colusa County Local Transportation $0.00 $0.00 Commission COMMERCE $0.00 $0.00 CORONA $0.00 $0.00 Council of San Benito County $0.00 $0.00 Governments County of Nevada Department of Public $0.00 $0.00 Works CULVER CITY $0.00 $0.00 DELANO $0.00 $0.00 Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority $0.00 $0.00 Eastern Sierra Transit Authority $0.00 $0.00 El Dorado County Transit Authority $0.00 $0.00 ELK GROVE CITY TREASURER $0.00 $0.00 FAIRFIELD $0.00 $0.00 FOLSOM CITY TREASURER $0.00 $0.00 Foothill Transit $0.00 $0.00 Fresno County Rural Transit Agency $0.00 $0.00 Gold Coast Transit $0.00 $0.00 Golden Empire Transit District $0.00 $0.00 Golden Gate
    [Show full text]
  • Rta Board Agenda
    RTA BOARD AGENDA Wednesday, July 9, 2014 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ CHAMBER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1055 Monterey Street, San Luis Obispo, California 93401 RTA starts at 8:30 a.m. The AGENDA is available/posted at: http://www.slorta.org President: Shelly Higginbotham Vice President: Debbie Arnold Board Members: Frank Mecham (First District – SLO County) Tom O’Malley (Atascadero) Bruce Gibson (Second District – SLO County) Debbie Peterson (Grover Beach) Adam Hill (Third District – SLO County) Jamie Irons (Morro Bay) Caren Ray (Fourth District – SLO County) Fred Strong (Paso Robles) Debbie Arnold (Fifth District – SLO County) Shelly Higginbotham (Pismo Beach) Tony Ferrara (Arroyo Grande) Jan Howell Marx (San Luis Obispo) Individuals wishing accessibility accommodations at this meeting under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) may request such accommodations to aid hearing, visual, or mobility impairment by contacting the SLORTA offices at 781- 4472. Please note that 48 hours advance notice will be necessary to honor a request. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENTS: This portion of the agenda is reserved for any members of the public to directly address the San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (RTA) Board on any items not on the agenda and within the jurisdiction of the Board. Comments are limited to three minutes per speaker. The Board will listen to all communication, but in compliance with the Brown Act, will not take any action on items that are not on the agenda. A. INFORMATION AGENDA A-1 Executive Director’s Report (Information) A-3 Introduce Potential Runabout Fare Program Changes (Information) B. ACTION AGENDA B-1 RTA FY15 Budget Amendment (Approve) B-2 “Dunk Your Kicks” for Day Pass benefiting the Max Cure Foundation (Approve) B-3 Strategic Business Plan Updated (Approve) C.
    [Show full text]