DOCSLIB.ORG

2010 RTA Capital Asset Condition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2010 RTA Capital Asset Condition Submitted to Regional Transportation Authority 175 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1500 Chicago, IL 60604-2711 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Capital Asset Condition Assessment prepared by URS CORPORATION in association with Kristine Fallon Associates, Inc. LTK Engineering Services Tecma Associates, Inc. Raul V. Bravo & Associates ESA Management and Engineering Consultants Laramore, Douglas, & Popham August 2010 This report is confidential and intended solely for the use and information of the agency to whom it is addressed REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Capital Asset Condition Assessment Table of Contents Executive Summary --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i Chapter 1: Summary of Background---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Review 1 Chapter 2: Inventory Framework---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Design -------------------- 6 Chapter 3: Condition Rating Process---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ 8 Chapter 4: Asset Inventory Tables and Sampling-------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- 13 Chapter 5: 10-Year Capital Needs Assessment ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 Tables Table i-1 Definitions of Asset Cost---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms ----------------------- iii Table i-2 10-Year Program Summary---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- iv Table 2-1 Inventory Asset Tables by Service Board-------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- 7 Table 3-1 Condition Rating Definition Comparison: RTA vs.----------------------------------------- FTA --------------------- 9 Table 3-2 Useful Life: CTA Assets---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- 10 Table 3-3 Useful Life: Metra Assets---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- 11 Table 3-4 Useful Life: Pace Assets--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 Table 4-1 CTA Sampling Results---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ 15 Table 4-2 Metra Sampling Results---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- 16 Table 4-3 Pace Sampling Results ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 17 Table 5-1 Definitions of Asset Cost---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms------------------- 19 Table 5-2 Asset Average Condition Ratings by Service Boards----------------------------------------- ------------------------- 22 Table 5-3 CTA Assets: 10-Year Needs Assessment Components (in 000’s) ------------------------------------------------ 23 Table 5-4 Metra Assets: 10-Year Needs Assessment Components (in 000’s) ------------------------------------ 25 Table 5-5 Pace Assets: 10-Year Needs Assessment Components (in 000’s) ---------------------------------- 27 Figures i-1 Rail Passenger Cars Condition Ratings ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- vi i-2 Passenger Train Station Condition Ratings ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- vi i-3 Rail Bridges and Structures: Condition Ratings-------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ vi i-4 Fixed Route Passenger Buses: Condition Ratings-------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- vii i-5 Rail Maintenance Facilities: Condition Ratings-------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- vii i-6 Passenger Train Station Condition Ratings ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vii Appendices A-1: Sampling Reports A-2a: CTA Inventory Tables A-2b: CTA 10-Year Needs A-3a: Metra Costs and Inventory Tables A-3b: Metra 10-Year Needs A-4a: Pace Costs and Inventory Tables A-4b: Pace 10-Year Needs A-5: CTA Asset Condition Ratings: Bar and Pie Charts A-6: Metra Asset Condition Ratings: Bar and Pie Charts A-7: Pace Asset Condition Ratings: Bar and Pie Charts A-8: 10-Year Needs Assessment Components (in 000’s) A-9: RTA Assessment Assumptions Regional Transportation Authority Capital Asset Condition Assessment Executive Summary This report summarizes the results of an 18-month effort to assess the condition of existing capital assets for each of the region’s three Service Boards: the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Metra and Pace. The report’s intent is to provide the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) with a plan for a capital asset condition assessment for each Service Board. The process establishes administrative criteria for the capital replacement, capital rehabilitation and capital maintenance of all assets. Representatives from the Service Boards assisted in all aspects of this process including: the design and development of the inventory tables, the condition ratings system based on useful life and industry standards, the definition of “State of Good Repair (SGR),” the sampling plan and sampling data. Asset Information Teams were formed to design and develop the inventory framework. Each Asset Information Team consisted of members representing the RTA, the Service Board and the URS Team. The Asset Information Teams were each associated with an individual Service Board. For discussion purposes at the Asset Information Team meetings, assets were grouped into five asset types: x Track and Structures x Electrical/Subway Equipment i Regional Transportation Authority Capital Asset Condition Assessment x Signals/ Communications/ Fare Collection x Stations/ Garages/ Facilities x Rolling Stock The Asset Information Teams determined the condition rating process that would be used to assess the condition of the Service Board’s assets. Early on in the assessment, it was determined that an asset’s age would act as the primary “predictor” of an asset’s condition. This approach reflected the best approach possible among the Service Boards while taking into consideration the limited resources of each Service Board and the established level of effort available to undertake the overall assessment. To quote the FTA in its report entitled Transit State of Good Repair: Beginning the Dialogue, October, 2008: “Physical asset condition assessment is the best way to measure SGR for individual assets and on an agency-wide basis. Asset age is a second- best proxy . .” While in-depth availability of information and data was unavailable for each asset for the Service Boards, sufficient data was collected and satisfactory age estimates were established for nearly all assets of the Service Boards. In some instances (e.g, Metra’s rail assets), age data was difficult to ascertain. Thus, an agreement was reached with Metra staff that costs for the regular replacement program would be used to determine 10-year needs in those instances until an accurate inventory could be compiled. Inventory tables form the basis for the 10-year capital needs assessment. During the process of compiling data for the age-based inventory tables, a number of asset groups were selected for an extremely limited on-site sampling effort. The sampling, representing less than 1% of each asset class, was meant to test the degree of consistency between asset age and the condition of assets in actual field conditions. For the most part, though not in all cases, the results of the limited sampling did generally confirm the condition rating process based on asset age. Clearly, to fully assess assets of all Service Boards, thorough inspections would need to be conducted for all assets. This initial 10-year capital needs assessment is based on cost components for backlog, normal replacement and capital maintenance (Table i-1). The backlog component is the value placed upon the replacement of assets characterized by an age greater than their useful life. These assets are still in service and typically have not been replaced within their useful life due to a lack of sufficient funding. Normal replacement costs are the planned replacement cost for assets that will reach the end of their useful life during the 10-year program, 2010-2019. These assets are still in service and would be scheduled for replacement during the 10-year program if sufficient funding were available. The capital maintenance component is the cost associated with keeping an asset in a State of Good Repair. Capital maintenance costs are typically significant and anticipated, and are associated with keeping the asset in service for the full term of its useful life. Capital maintenance costs are characterized by replacement or rehabilitation of asset components, but not replacement of the entire asset. Assets in service beyond their useful lives will typically require increased capital maintenance costs. In addition to backlog, normal replacement and capital maintenance costs, soft and contingency costs were added to the total cost of assets. The majority of soft costs are expended in the planning, engineering, and project
Load more

Recommended publications
  • January 15Th, 2018
    The Dearborn Express Sponsored by the South Loop Referral Group dearbornexpress.org Serving Printers Row and Dearborn Park Al Hippensteel, editor [email protected] Janice Koerber, Asst. Editor Jan. 15, 2018 Vol. 6, No. 1 Five Year Anniversary In this Issue This is our 83rd Issue. Beth Finke. Annelore Chapin, We started this publi- Beth’s guest writer, Takes “An cation on February 1, Optimistic look at the Future.” 2013. It was no acci- Page 9 dent. We heard that the local newspaper , the Chicago Jour- nal, was going to Bonnie McGrath. Two things that cease publication in really drive me crazy about the the South Loop. We new tax bill: bums and elitists decided that it would Page 4 be a worthwhile effort if we tried to, in some Mondays with Mike: Speaks to a small way, replace some of the news that was lost. We documentary about Daniel Ells- don’t pretend to be the Journal’s equal. They were a berg and the Pentagon Papers. professional publication with a paid staff. This is strictly a non-profit effort. Our goal is to support local Page 5 businesses and local organizations and provide news of Printers Row and Dearborn Park. It is sponsored by the South Loop Referral Group, a networking group Marianne Goss. of small business owners. We would like to thank Should safety experts study those who have contributed to providing quality, lively occasional drivers? reading. Page 18 Bonnie McGrath has been in every issue, Beth Finke joined us in September, 2013 with her wit and WOMEN’S MARCH JAN 20TH, SEE PG 15 wisdom.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 RAIL South in Town Routes.Xlsx
    Chicago Greyhound Bus Station - In-Town Routes Cue Mile Incr. Action Description Cue Mile Incr. Action Description Parking Garage CTA L Train Station - LaSalle & Van Buren CG-1 0.0 0.0 R R on W. Harrison St. out of Greyhound Bus Station CG-36 0.0 0.0 R R on W. Harrison St. out of Greyhound Bus Station CG-2 0.1 0.1 - [Cross over I-90/94 Kennedy Expy.] CG-37 0.4 0.4 - [Cross Chicago River] CG-3 0.7 0.6 R R on S. Racine Ave. CG-38 0.5 0.1 L L on S. Financial Pl. CG-4 0.8 0.1 - [Cross over I-290 Eisenhower Expy.] CG-39 0.7 0.2 R R on W. Van Buren St. CG-5 1.2 0.4 L L on W. Madison St. CTA L Train Station - LaSalle & Van CG-40 0.8 0.1 Stop CG-6 1.4 0.2 Stop Parking - Block Y Garage on L Buren on R CG-7 R R on W. Madison St. out of parking garage CG-41 L L on W. Van Buren St. out of CTA L Train Station CG-8 1.6 0.2 R R on S. Racine Ave. CG-42 L L on S. Financial Pl. CG-9 2.0 0.4 - [Cross over I-290 Eisenhower Expy.] CG-43 1.0 0.2 R R on W. Harrison St. CG-10 2.1 0.1 L L on W. Harrison St. CG-44 1.2 0.2 - [Cross Chicago River] CG-11 2.7 0.6 - [Cross over I-90/94 Kennedy Expy.] CG-45 1.6 0.4 R R into Greyhound Bus Station CG-12 2.8 0.1 L L into Greyhound Bus Station CG-46 Stop Greyhound Bus Station on L CG-13 Stop Greyhound Bus Station on L CTA L Train Station - Harrison Supported Hotel CG-47 0.0 0.0 R R on W.
    [Show full text]
  • Cta 2016 Historical Calendar Cta 2016 January
    cta 2016 Historical Calendar cta 2016 January Chicago Motor Coach Company (CMC) bus #434, manufactured by the Ford Motor Company, was part of a fleet of buses operated by the Chicago Motor Coach Company, one of the predecessor transit companies that were eventually assimilated into the Chicago Transit Authority. The CMC originally operated buses exclusively on the various park boulevards in Chicago, and became known by the marketing slogan, “The Boulevard Route.” Later, service was expanded to operate on some regular streets not served by the Chicago Surface Lines, particularly on the fringes of the city. Chicagoans truly wanted a unified transit system, and it was for this reason that the Chicago Transit Authority was established by charter in 1945. The CMC was not one of the initial properties purchased that made up CTA’s inaugural services on October 1, 1947; however, it was bought by CTA in 1952. D E SABCDEFG: MDecember 2015 T February 2016 W T F S CTA Operations Division S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Group Days Off 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 t Alternate day off if you 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 work on this day 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 l Central offices closed 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 27 28 29 30 31 28 29 1New Year’s Day 2 E F G A B C D 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 D E F G A B C 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 C D E F G A B 17 18Martin Luther King, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Surface Lines Car 4051 the Laboratory PCC Car and Its Predecessors by George E
    Chicago Surface Lines Car 4051 The Laboratory PCC Car and Its Predecessors By George E. Kanary ost students of electric street rail - pete with the motor bus and the automo - “Laboratory PCC car 4051” leaves the loop way transportation are familiar bile, both of which had taken ridership at Milwaukee Avenue and Imlay Street, the city Mwith the story of the PCC car. A from the street railways. By the advent of limits with Niles, on August 6, 1940. This was genuine American design success story, it the 1930s streetcars were increasingly the only PCC car to operate on Milwaukee revolutionized urban surface rail transit thought of as being old and outmoded. Avenue. —Edward Frank, Jr. photo, Shore Line not only in the United States and Canada, Leading the design team were Dr. Collection but overseas in Europe as well. In a short Thomas Conway, Jr., Chairman, and began in 1932, was by payment of an time the truck design and method of con - Clarence F. Hirshfeld, Chief Engineer. Dr. assessment determined by the size of the trol and propulsion was adapted to rapid Conway, formerly a professor at the city concerned and Chicago Surface Lines transit cars also. University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton was levied the largest fee, $46,000 over Because of their glamorous appearance School of Finance, was already well known three years. The Chicago Rapid Transit and visibility on the streets of North in Chicago for his reorganization and over - Co. fee was the same, but because of the American cities, PCC cars not only influ - haul of the failing Aurora Elgin & Chicago desperate financial condition of the com - enced increased ridership but also estab - RR in the 1920s.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Loop
    Chapter 4: Central Area Planning Subdistricts Page 4-35 August 2009 South West Loop The South West Loop is bounded on the north by Congress Parkway, on the south by 16th Street, on the east by the South Branch of the Chicago River and on the west by the Dan Ryan Expressway. The South West Loop contains light industrial and back office/service operation uses, with significant new retail development along the Roosevelt Road corridor. Zoning in the subdistrict is committed to protecting the existing non-residential uses, and as of 2007 fewer than 1,200 people lived in the South West Loop, mak- ing it the least populated subdistrict in the Central Area. Chicago Central Area ACTION Plan Page 4-36 Chapter 4: Central Area Planning Subdistricts August 2009 SOUTH WEst LOOP Trends, 2000-2007 Clinton Street that provide direct Consistent with the 2003 Central service into the West Loop. Area Plan, Roosevelt Road has joined Michigan Avenue and State Street as a major retail corridor in the Central Policies & Actions Area. Whole Foods, DSW, Home Depot, Best Buy, Panera Bread, and Financial / Incentive Starbucks are among the new offer- • The Jefferson/Roosevelt TIF and ings along Roosevelt Road. Roosevelt/Canal TIF funds should continue to make a priority of ad- These projects have followed in the ditional River crossings and exten- example of South Loop Marketplace, sion of the grid system. anchored by a Dominick’s grocery store, which opened in 1998 and pro- Regulatory vided the first new shopping south of • Current zoning in South West Congress Boulevard.
    [Show full text]
  • 66 Annual Midwest Conference on British Studies September 27-29
    “Manchester Heroes” 1819 (Colour). I.R. Cruikshank. © Manchester Libraries (GB127.m77801) 66th Annual Midwest Conference on British Studies September 27-29, 2019 Chicago, IL Hosted by Loyola University Chicago MWCBS 2019 HOSTED BY LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO LOCAL GUIDE TO CHICAGO Welcome to Chicago! Loyola University Chicago is pleased to host the 2019 MWCBS in Chicago. Chicago is a world- class city that is second to none in every Chicagoan’s book. It is best known for being the home of the skyscraper, a majestic 26-mile lakeshore with an 18.5-mile lakefront path, and the many long-winded politicians who gave the city its nickname—the Windy City. The city is rich with historic sites from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and also boasts access to a host of excellent bars, restaurants, breweries, live music, and sporting events for the curious traveler to sample. Many of these sites are located within walking distance of the Hampton Inn Chicago North—Loyola Station or are just a short taxi ride away. Getting around: Travel to Hotel from Chicago O’Hare (ORD) or Chicago Midway (MDW): From O'Hare Airport: Take I-90 East 2.7 miles to Exit 82A Nagle. Take 1st left onto Nagle Ave and go 1.05 miles. Take a right onto Devon Ave and go 4.02 miles. Turn left onto N. Kedzie Ave and go for 0.50 miles to Pratt Blvd and take a right. Take Pratt Blvd for 2.35 miles to Lakewood Ave and take a right for 0.18 miles and then take a slight left onto Albion Ave and go 0.14 miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Steve Hastalis Committee Members
    1 ADA Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, April 14, 2014 Members Present Chairperson: Steve Hastalis Committee Members: Garland Armstrong Rhychell Barnes Dorrell Perry Doreen Bogus Mary Anne Cappelleri Bryen Yunashko Grace Kaminkowitz Excused: Maurice Fantus Tim Fischer Laura Miller Facilitator: Amy Serpe, CTA Manager, ADA Compliance Programs Steve Hastalis, Committee Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. Roll Call • Members of the Committee introduced themselves. • Maurice Fantus, Tim Fischer, and Laura Miller had excused absences from the meeting. Announcement • There was an announcement that Yochai Eisenberg has resigned from the Committee. Approval of Minutes from January 13, 2014 Meeting • There were a couple of changes to the January 14, 2014 minutes. Rosemary Gerty pointed out the correct spelling of Anne LeFevre’s name. Ms. Gerty clarified that the RTA Appeals Board for Paratransit certification does not reevaluate, but rather discusses the terms of appeals in order to gain additional information. Ms. Gerty also updated the number of appeals in 2013 to 112. Ms. Kaminkowitz withdrew her motion and moved to accept the minutes as corrected. Mr. Armstrong seconded the motion. Mr. Hastalis asked for a vote to approve the minutes as amended. The Committee unanimously approved the minutes of the Committee’s January 14, 2014 meeting. Rail Car Information • Mr. Robert Kielba, Chief Rail Equipment Engineer, stated that there are about 432, 5,000 Series rail cars in service. There are 14 cars running with the new door opening chime activated primarily on the Red, Yellow, and Purple Lines. • There are 58 cars loaded with the software at a rate of four to six cars completed in a week.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017Chicago Transit Authority a Horse Drawn Omnibus, Originally Operated by the Citizen’S Line Circa 1853, Is Displayed at West Shops at Pulaski and Lake
    HISTORICAL CALENDAR 2017Chicago Transit Authority A horse drawn omnibus, originally operated by the Citizen’s Line circa 1853, is displayed at West Shops at Pulaski and Lake. These early transit vehicles were quite primitive, barely just a notch above stagecoaches – little more than hard, wooden bench seats were provided on either side of very sparsely appointed coaches, with no heat, light, or other amenities. It is hard to believe that, from such humble beginnings, Chicago would one day have the second largest public transit system in North America, as it does today. January 2017 S M T W T F S B C D E F G A 1 New Year’s Day 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E F G 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 G A B C D E F Martin Luther 15 16 King, Jr. Day 17 18 19 20 21 F G A B C D E 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 E F G ABCDEFG: December 2016 February 2017 CTA Operations S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Division 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 Group Days Off 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t Alternate day off if 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 you work on this day 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 30 31 l Central offices closed 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 26 27 28 Chicago streetcar #225 is outside of the 77th Street carbarn, sporting an early Chicago Transit Authority emblem but still wearing the red and cream color scheme of its predecessor company, the Chicago Surface Lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago & West Towns Railways, Inc
    INSPIICTION TRIP CHICAGO & WEST TOWNS RAILWAYS, INC. (j SUNDAY, APRIL 23rd, 1939 Z ITINER~RY of TRIP 12:00 noon Depart in special cars of 139 type from C&WT terminal at 22nd & Kenton opposite Hawthorne Works, Western Electric Co. 1:00 p.m. Arrive LaGrange station, stopping en route in Riverside, at Desplaines River, Brookfield and LaGrange Park to photograph special cars in typical backgrounds. 1:25 p.m. Arrive Harlem barn to inspect and photograph shops and rolling stock, including line car 15 made of old passenger car. 2:05 p.m. Leave barns and proceed to 52nd Avenue, cross to Chicago Ave., car route and then to Roosevelt, west over joint track with Chicago Surface Lines to Austin and on to Desplaines Ave., north along regular route, stopping at typical residential background for photographs, to Lake Street and east to the Lake Street barn. </) 3:00 p.m. Arrive Lake st. barn and inspect and photograph equipment, including old power plant. Z 3:45 p.m. Leave Lake Street barn, retracing route to 22nd, then east to Kenton Avenue. 4:30 p.m. Arrive Kenton Ave., terminal, and leave special cars. ~ The above times are approximate and will be varied from as conditions l- may require. I­ (j) L :5 o o ~ u r u ~l:i'llITI:14.L I:LI:CTI:1IC 1:>4.1 LI'4.i'llIS~ ASS()CI4.TI()i'llI CIiIC4(;V. ILLINVIS BULLETIN NUMBER THREE April, 1939 ©1939, 2008 Central Electric Railfans' Association 1 www.cera-chicago.org Bulletin lUmber !hree of the Central Electric Railfans' A8sociation (Division of the national Electric Railroaders' Association, ••Y.) Duplicate copie8 8&7 be ,ecured at 15~ each by addre88ing OmRA , at 1240 idhon Building, Ohicqo OHIOAGO I WEST TOWNS RAILWAYS.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 RTA Regional Ridership Report
    2015 REPORT REGIONAL RIDERSHIP MOVING YOU Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Factors Affecting Travel Patterns .............................................................................................................. 4 Market Analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 5 CTA ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Metra ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Pace Suburban Service .............................................................................................................................. 8 Pace ADA Paratransit ................................................................................................................................ 9 The Region in 2015 ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Unemployment ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Historical Calendar Cta 2021 January
    cta 2021 Historical Calendar cta 2021 January Built in 1936 by the St. Louis Car Company, Chicago Surface Lines trolley bus #184 heads eastbound via Diversey to Western. Trolley bus service was first introduced in Chicago on the #76 Diversey route in 1930. Other trolley bus routes were soon added, some as extensions of existing streetcar lines and later as conversions of streetcar lines to trolley bus service. Trolley bus extensions to existing streetcar lines were an economical way to serve new neighborhoods that were established in outlying parts of the city. Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat ABCDEFG: December 2020 February 2021 B C CTA Operations S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Division 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Group Days Off 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 t Alternate day off if 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 you work on this day 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 l Central offices closed 27 28 29 30 31 28 1 New Year’s Day 2 C D E F G A B 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 B C D E F G A 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G Martin Luther King, 17 18 Jr. Day 19 20 21 22 23 G A B C D E F 24 F 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 cta 2021 February Car #1643 was an example of Chicago’s first electric streetcars.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Illini Weekend Getaway in Town Routes.Xlsx
    Chicago Amtrak Train Station - In-Town Routes Cue Mile Incr. Action Description Cue Mile Incr. Action Description Parking Garage CTA L Train Station - Clinton (Blue Line) CA-1 0.0 0.0 R R on S. Clinton St. out of Union Station CA-35 0.0 0.0 R R on S. Clinton St. out of Union Station CA-2 0.2 0.2 - [Cross under I-290 Eisenhower Expy.] CTA L Train Station - Clinton (Blue CA-3 0.3 0.1 R R on W. Harrison St. CA-36 0.2 0.2 Stop CA-4 0.5 0.2 - [Cross over I-90/94 Kennedy Expy.] Line) on L CA-5 1.1 0.6 R R on S. Racine Ave. CA-37 R R on bike path on N. Clinton St. out of Union Station CA-6 1.2 0.1 - [Cross over I-290 Eisenhower Expy.] Amtrak and Metra Train Station - CA-7 1.6 0.4 L L on W. Madison St. CA-38 0.4 0.2 Stop Union Station on L CA-8 1.8 0.2 Stop Parking - Block Y Garage on L CA-9 R R on W. Madison St. out of parking garage CA-10 2.0 0.2 R R on S. Racine Ave. CTA L Train Station - Clinton (Green and Pink Lines) CA-11 2.4 0.4 - [Cross over I-290 Eisenhower Expy.] CA-39 0.0 0.0 L L on bike path on N. Clinton St. out of Union Station CA-12 2.5 0.1 L L on W.
    [Show full text]