DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction: Public Anthropology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction: Public Anthropology Introduction: Public Anthropology Sam Beck Cornell University What if we use theory and method to benefi t nomic and political issues; and confl ict and the people we study and with whom we part- misunderstanding between and among societ- ner to develop an increasingly just world in ies through mediation. The intent of this issue which inequities are reduced and all people is to provide a roadmap for anthropologists may believe in their ability to reach their po- seeking a larger role in society that we can tentials by having access to resources that are name ‘Public Anthropology’. Very much like more or less equally available, distributed and any concept, there is no one defi nition that lim- accessible? Each in her or his way, the contribu- its this idea’s meaning. Public anthropology is tors to this ‘Special Issue on Public Anthropol- fertile ground for anthropologists to explore ogy’ provide example trajectories which move opportunities for involvement and engage- anthropologists in this direction. ment inside and outside the discipline, and In responding to an article on public sociol- inside and outside their objects of research. ogy by Burawoy (2005), Aranowitz indicated What all share is the idea that local groups and the importance of public engagement and its communities should be able to control their origins based on a discourse of the ‘public’ in own well-being and quality of life with the participatory democracy. While we are far from sophistication of corporate or governmental reaching what appears to be a utopian dream, institutions. Central to this work is a method there are anthropologists who are working to- that takes us away from a solely enquiry-based wards such a goal. Li le disagreement appears methodology and towards one that is dialogic within the discipline about the aim of anthro- and change oriented.1 This is an anthropology pology as an intellectual discipline constructed that requires people at the local level to be to benefi t humankind, an issue most recently full participants in research and publications. broached by a number of people engaged in Cammarota put it this way: ‘the researcher is thinking about ‘public scholarship’ in general consistently changing his or her questions and (Mitchell 2008). perspectives via the collective input of com- Despite periodic deviations that move an- munity members, while the community learns thropology away from its tacit ethical centre, through the researcher’s involvement’ (2008: anthropology in the fi rst part of the twenty- 46). Knowledge, in this approach, becomes a fi rst century has returned to constructing an public good in its ‘orientation and application intellectual discipline that is not only con- that furthers the general vitality of the mar- cerned with historical processes, political eco- ginalized community’ (2008: 48). Moreover, nomic forces and conditions, or discourse ethics here, as Pels noted, is not something that analysis, but in addition involves itself in is tacked on, but is ‘internal to our research’ shaping the direction of present and future do- (2005: 96). mestic and international politics; activist agen- The thrust and movement towards con- das of local communities; the general public’s necting anthropology to real world contexts, deeper understanding of sociocultural, eco- conditions and processes occur episodically Anthropology in Action, 16, 2 (2009): 1–13 © Berghahn Books and the Association for Anthropology in Action doi:10.3167/aia.2009.160201 AiA | Sam Beck in the history of the discipline and though we discipline never existed and at present cannot can make linkages to produce a linear history exist without publics.5 Field and Fox asserted which demonstrates the formation of a ‘tradi- that ‘most anthropology has been “engaged” tion’ for and of a public anthropology, by do- and public in intention’ (2007: 4). This is par- ing only this we miss the very nature of what is ticularly true, at least since the Second World pressing anthropology into the public domain War, as the mission of the academy changed at this particular moment. Borofsky and oth- dramatically and as universities increasingly ers in academic circles have defi ned the public were penetrated by what Giroux called the anthropologist as one who ‘engages issues ‘military-industrial-academic complex (2007) and audiences beyond today’s self-imposed and pernicious ‘audit culture’ (Strathern 2000). disciplinary boundaries’ (2000; reproduced in This is not to assert that the academic and his Public Anthropology website) by writing, universities were ever independent of publics publishing or speaking in public media. Many (see Bender 1997, Boren 2001). However, it is other anthropologists use public anthropolo- with which publics, how and with what in- gy’s theories and methods in a broader sense tensity public engagement occurs that defi nes that reach beyond the academic form of public a public anthropology and diff erentiates it anthropology. Borofsky put the focus ‘on con- from other anthropological practices, theories versations with broad audiences about broad and methods. And this is something for which concerns’.2 Cox perceives public anthropol- anthropology must account. Moreover, the ogy ‘to be an anthropology of the public that discipline must recognize it as a central com- disrupts the traditional academy–community ponent of professional practice and not allow dichotomy by locating the intellectual and po- it to be marginalized as applied anthropology litical strategies necessary to eff ectively address had been, similarly locking out public anthro- social concerns with the dialogues that occur pologists as somehow less valued, and forcing in the public sphere as well as in disciplin- their sub-discipline like a minority position to ary based discussions – loosening the hinged reinvent itself, perhaps by creating a ‘Public border that artifi cially separate the two’ (2009: Anthropology Association’. Nor should an- 53). Her position radicalizes Borofsky’s under- thropology place public anthropology within a standing of public anthropology. Yet both per- stratifi ed, hierarchical division of labour in the spectives, for me, are not enough. I believe that discipline, a condition against which Singer public anthropology must include not only or warned us (2000). just conversations, dialogues or discussions.3 In her work as an employee of a Detroit The articles in this Special Issue are a start of homeless shelter for young women, with whom a larger project that seeks to demonstrate how she identifi es as being involved in the same far the reach of a broad Public Anthropology struggle and with whom she worked, Cox presently exists in the discipline. This is a sign indicates that the young women ‘have shown of vigour in anthropology because this kind me one way to explode public anthropology to of anthropology breaks down the barriers that accommodate co-theorising and co-authorship isolate anthropologists in a discourse limited through performance’ (2009: 60). Smith’s no- to themselves. tions complement those identifi ed by Cox. Her I follow Burawoy’s inclusive direction for approach moves research into the hands of ‘public sociology’ by advocating for a public an- those we normally research (2007). Her work thropology among other anthropologies.4 It is entailed working with her own people, the not as if anthropology, academic anthropology Maori of New Zealand. She critiques Western (‘professional’ in Burawoy’s terms) in particu- knowledge production and suggests research lar, has ever been independent of publics. The based on developing indigenous people’s re- 2 | Introduction: Public Anthropology | AiA search capacities, with outsiders invited to fare of all those aff ected by their work’ (see the participate in research that the people identify American Anthropology Association’s Code of and determine – a very diff erent sort of public Ethics). At present, we are confl icted because anthropology. This kind of research confi rms nationalism, expressed as patriotism, brought the capacity and power of local-level knowl- some anthropologists to position themselves edge production, legitimizing people’s own as participants in what they might consider a perceptions of their culture. ‘just war’, or understand the work in which The American Anthropology Association they are engaged as protecting vulnerable West- (AAA) did recognize public anthropology in ern, especially American, interests.7 a unique way in the November 1986 amended Anthropologists study processes and is- ‘Principles of Professional Responsibility’, fi rst sues aff ecting general human welfare and adapted by the Council of the American An- conditions. It is safe to say that not all anthro- thropological Association in May 1971 (see pologists do this, especially where contractual h p://www.aaanet.org/stmts/ethnstmnt.htm), arrangements may vitiate the ethical stance which claimed public engagement as a central quoted above. This is not to say that other tenet of what anthropologists were ethically practitioners of anthropology, who do not see obliged to do. themselves as applied anthropologists, are Public anthropology has implications for ‘pure’ in the work they do, especially when theory, method and methodologies. The con- carrying out fi eldwork, as they generate the troversy that brewed regarding the engage- data they use to increase their credibility in the ment of anthropology with military purposes discipline. I can safely say that many of us of- is an example (see Glenn 2007, Griffi n 2007, ten work in grey areas, even when we try hard Vine 2007), one that is, in many ways, not so to protect and safeguard ‘our people’. new (Wolf and Jorgensen 1970, Price 2005; also The AAA backed away from forms of ethi- see Wakin 1992). How anthropologists partici- cal engagements with ‘research populations’. pated in the Vietnam War anticipated what is In 1986 the AAA statement on ethics was now happening in the Middle East and Central an expression of what was deemed essen- Asia. This particular issue raises into relief a tial to the practice of anthropology that had set of values, professional practices and ethi- moral implications.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to Cultural Anthropology
    An Introduction to Cultural Anthropology An Introduction to Cultural Anthropology By C. Nadia Seremetakis An Introduction to Cultural Anthropology By C. Nadia Seremetakis This book first published 2017 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2017 by C. Nadia Seremetakis All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-7334-9 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-7334-5 To my students anywhere anytime CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Part I: Exploring Cultures Chapter One ................................................................................................. 4 Redefining Culture and Civilization: The Birth of Anthropology Fieldwork versus Comparative Taxonomic Methodology Diffusion or Independent Invention? Acculturation Culture as Process A Four-Field Discipline Social or Cultural Anthropology? Defining Culture Waiting for the Barbarians Part II: Writing the Other Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 30 Science/Literature Chapter Three ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Capacs Phd Standards.Pdf
    Applied Sociology, Clinical Sociology, Engaged Public Sociology, Translational Sociology, and Forensic Sociology Programs in Sociological Practice Doctoral Level STANDARDS Copyright © 2013, 2015, 2020 The Commission on the Accreditation of Programs in Applied and Clinical Sociology Organizational Dynamics 3 Fieldstone Drive Morristown, NJ 07960 Phone: 973-290-9334 Fax: 973-290-9335 https://capacs.net Standards for Applied Sociology, Clinical Sociology, Engaged Public Sociology, Translational Sociology, and Forensic Sociology Programs in Sociological Practice Doctoral Level In this document, the Commission on the Accreditation of Programs in Applied and Clinical Sociology (hereafter referred to as the Commission or CAPACS) presents standards for programs in applied sociology, clinical sociology, engaged public sociology , translational sociology , and forensic sociology at the bachelor’s level. Throughout this document, sociological practice will be used as the umbrella term that encompasses these and other approaches of sociological practice identity that may emerge consistent with the program curricula, education, training, and professional work recognized by the Commission. The Commission recognizes that training and education in sociological practice occurs in many different types of institutions and may be called by many different names. Therefore, in this document, a program is any coherent sequence of courses (classroom, online, distance, or hybrid/blended learning) and/or learning experiences that has as its core the application of sociological knowledge, methods, and skills in a practice setting. This may include programs in applied sociology, clinical sociology, engaged public sociology, translational sociology, forensic sociology, criminology, gerontology, and policy analysis, and other programs that may be based in sociology departments, as well as parts of other Interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary degree programs, usually within an institution of higher learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Anthropology in 2015: <I>Charlie Hebdo</I
    AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST YEAR IN REVIEW Public Anthropology Public Anthropology in 2015: Charlie Hebdo, Black Lives Matter, Migrants, and More Angelique Haugerud ABSTRACT In this review essay, I focus on how anthropologists have addressed salient public issues such as the European refugee and migrant crisis, the Black Lives Matter movement, and the attack on the Paris office of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. Public anthropology relies on slow ethnography and fast responses to breaking news stories. It is theoretically informed but reaches out to audiences beyond the academy. Drawing on proliferating anthropological contributions to news media and blogs, as well as scholarly articles and books, I explore how anthropologists today counter grand narratives such as the “clash of civilizations”; how they grapple with risky popular misconceptions of culture, difference, and suffering; and how they surface less visible forms of compassion, care, and solidarity that have long sustained our species. The challenges of this era of growing polarization and anti-intellectualism appear to have energized rather than quieted public anthropology. [public anthropology, Charlie Hebdo, Black Lives Matter, migrants, year in review] RESUMEN En este ensayo de revision,´ centro mi atencion´ en como´ los antropologos´ han abordado cuestiones publicas´ relevantes tales como la crisis de migrantes y refugiados en Europa, el movimiento las Vidas Negras Importan, y el ataque a la oficina de Parıs´ del magazine satırico´ Charlie Hebdo. La antropologıa´ publica´ depende de la etnografıa´ lenta y las respuestas rapidas´ a las historias de noticas de ultima´ hora. Es teoricamente´ informada, pero alcanza a llegar a audiencias mas´ alla´ de la academia.
    [Show full text]
  • SM 5 Culture Genuine and Spurious
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by eVols at University of Hawaii at Manoa Savage Minds Occasional Papers No. 5 Culture, Genuine and Spurious By Edward Sapir Edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub First edition, 5 November, 2013 Savage Minds Occasional Papers 1. The Superorganic by Alfred Kroeber, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub 2. Responses to “The Superorganic”: Texts by Alexander Goldenweiser and Edward Sapir, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub 3. The History of the Personality of Anthropology by Alfred Kroeber, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub 4. Culture and Ethnology by Robert Lowie, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub 5. Culture, Genuine and Spurious by Edward Sapir, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub Copyright information This original work is copyright by Alex Golub, 2013. The author has issued the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States license. You are free • to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work • to remix - to adapt the work Under the following conditions • attribution - you must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author • noncommercial - you may not use this work for commercial purposes • share alike - if you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one This work includes excerpts from Sapir, Edward. 1924. Culture, genuine and spurious. American Journal of Sociology 29 (4): 401-429. This work is in the public domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Relations, Disciplinary Identity, and the Strong Program in Professional Sociology1
    Reflections on Public Sociology: Public Relations, Disciplinary Identity, and the Strong Program in Professional Sociology1 DAVID BOYNS AND JESSE FLETCHER Public sociology is an attempt to redress the issues of public engagement and disciplinary identity that have beset the discipline over the past several decades. While public sociology seeks to rectify the public invisibility of sociology, this paper investigates the limitations of it program. Several points of critique are offered. First, public sociology’s affiliations with Marx- ism serve to potentially entrench existing divisions within the discipline. Second, public sociology’s advancement of an agenda geared toward a “sociology for publics” instead of a “sociology of publics” imposes limitations on the development of a public interface. Third, the lack of a methodological agenda for public sociology raises concerns of how sociology can compete within a contested climate of public opinion. Fourth, issues of disciplinary coherence are not necessarily resolved by public sociology, and are potentially exacerbated by the invoca- tion of public sociology as a new disciplinary identity. Fifth, the incoherence of professional sociology is obviated, and a misleading affiliation is made between scientific knowledge and the hegemonic structure of the profession. Finally, the idealism of public sociology’s putative defense of civil society is explored as a utopian gesture akin to that of Habermas’ attempt to revive the public sphere. The development of a strong program in professional sociology is briefly offered as a means to repair the disciplinary problems that are illustrated by emergence of the project of public sociology. Introduction: Sociology and Its Public Face Michael Burawoy is right—if sociology is to thrive, it needs a stronger public presence.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Burawoy's Public Sociology: a Post-Empiricist Critique." in the Handbook of Public Sociology, Edited by Vincent Jeffries, 47-70
    Morrow, Raymond A. "Rethinking Burawoy's Public Sociology: A Post-Empiricist Critique." In The Handbook of Public Sociology, edited by Vincent Jeffries, 47-70. Lantham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009. 3 Rethinking Burawoy’s Public Sociology: A Post-Empiricist Reconstruction Raymond A. Morrow Following Michael Burawoy’s ASA presidential address in August 2004, “For Public Sociology,” an unprecedented international debate has emerged on the current state and future of sociology (Burawoy 2005a). The goal here will be to provide a stock-taking of the resulting commentary that will of- fer some constructive suggestions for revising and reframing the original model. The central theme of discussion will be that while Burawoy’s mani- festo is primarily concerned with a plea for the institutionalization of pub- lic sociology, it is embedded in a very ambitious social theoretical frame- work whose full implications have not been worked out in sufficient detail (Burawoy 2005a). The primary objective of this essay will be to highlight such problems in the spirit of what Saskia Sassen calls “digging” to “detect the lumpiness of what seems an almost seamless map” (Sassen 2005:401) and to provide suggestions for constructive alternatives. Burawoy’s proposal has enjoyed considerable “political” success: “Bura- woy’s public address is, quite clearly, a politician’s speech—designed to build consensus and avoid ruffling too many feathers” (Hays 2007:80). As Patricia Hill Collins puts it, the eyes of many students “light up” when the schema is presented: “There’s the aha factor at work. They reso- nate with the name public sociology. Wishing to belong to something bigger than themselves” (Collins 2007:110–111).
    [Show full text]
  • Revistă Lunară Editată De Centrul Cultural Judeţean Constanţa „Teodor T
    DATINA Serie nouă, anul 6, nr. 80, decembrie 2020 www.cctb.ro Revistă lunară editată de Centrul Cultural Judeţean Constanţa „Teodor T. Burada” al Consiliului Județean Constanța Piesă vestimentară semnată de Lucia Niculescu, expert în cadrul compartimentului Școala Populară de Arte și Meserii, catedra Arte Vizuale, clasa Design Vestimentar Cuprins De pe la noi 4 „Pentru toate este un timp” Profesorii noştri 25 Amor vincit omnia! Doru Iftene Obiceiuri de pe la noi 7 Ignat și inătoarea Românii sunt pretutindeni 27 Valentina Andrei a cucerit Elveţia Dobrogea – locuri şi oameni de poveste 10 O iarnă înverșunată 2020 Anul Gusti 29 Contribuţia lui Dimitrie Gusti Eveniment în crearea știinţei sociologice 13 Festivalul Internaţional de Muzică Corală „I.D.Chirescu” Cernavodă - Ediţie Online Inedit 33 Liviu Rebreanu și Constanţa Spiritualitate 15 Ovidius în fondul patrimonial al Reconstituiri bibliotecilor constănţene 35 N. Mihăescu - un poet erou „Pe căi dificile, către astre” Remember 18 Interviu cu prof. univ. dr. hab. Floretina Nicolae 36 Decembrie în istoria Dobrogei La pas prin Dobrogea istorică Copilărie 20 Tulcea cosmopolită a secolului al XIX-lea; 37 Expoziţie de desene ale copiilor mahalalele etnice Datina, fondată în 1991, serie nouă, Revistă lunară editată de Centrul Cultural Judeţean Constanţa „Teodor T. Burada” al Consiliului Judeţean Constanţa ISSN 1221-2253 DIRECTOR GENERAL INTERIMAR: ALINA ONEL REDACTOR ŞEF: CONF.UNIV. DR. AURELIA LĂPUŞAN REDACTORI: ANA MARIA ŞTEFAN, IULIA PANĂ, RALUCA PETRE, OVIDIU DUNĂREANU, ADRIAN NICOLA Director economic interimar:Andreea TOADER Tehnoredactor: Traian Mircea VOINEAGU Corectură: Daniela Andra COJOCEA Copyright text şi fotografii © Centrul Cultural Judeţean Constanţa „Teodor T. Burada” Copyright prezentare grafică © 2016 Editura Datina Iconografie: arhiva Centrului şi colecţii particulare Tiparul FOTO STORY SRL Constanţa, bd.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaged Anthropology, Diversity and Dilemmas
    Current Anthropology Volume 51 Supplement 2 October 2010 Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas Leslie C. Aiello Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas: Wenner-Gren Symposium Supplement 2 S201 Setha M. Low and Sally Engle Merry Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas: An Introduction to Supplement 2 S203 Ida Susser The Anthropologist as Social Critic: Working toward a More Engaged Anthropology S227 Barbara Rose Johnston Social Responsibility and the Anthropological Citizen S235 Norma Gonza´lez Advocacy Anthropology and Education: Working through the Binaries S249 Michael Herzfeld Engagement, Gentrification, and the Neoliberal Hijacking of History S259 Signe Howell Norwegian Academic Anthropologists in Public Spaces S269 John L. Jackson Jr. On Ethnographic Sincerity S279 Jonathan Spencer The Perils of Engagement: A Space for Anthropology in the Age of Security? S289 Kamari M. Clarke Toward a Critically Engaged Ethnographic Practice S301 Kamran Asdar Ali Voicing Difference: Gender and Civic Engagement among Karachi’s Poor S313 Alan Smart Tactful Criticism in Hong Kong: The Colonial Past and Engaging with the Present S321 http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CA Current Anthropology Volume 51, Supplement 2, October 2010 S201 Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas Wenner-Gren Symposium Supplement 2 by Leslie C. Aiello Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas grew out of a tiative on environmental issues involving 70 international and Wenner-Gren-sponsored workshop titled “The Anthropolo- interdisciplinary scholars who were selected for their common gist as Social Critic: Working toward a More Engaged An- interest and curiosity about the human impact on the earth. thropology” held at the foundation headquarters in New York Among many other Wenner-Gren meetings dealing with City, January 22–25, 2008 (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Sociology/Contexts
    Sociology 504: Public Sociology Spring 2013 Arlene Stein [email protected] Thursday 1:10‐3:50 Office hours: Thursday 4‐5 and by appointment This is a course that will both reflect upon the idea of “public sociology” and produce public sociological work. In the analytical component, we will explore such questions as: what is the sociological audience? What is the relationship between academia and public intellectual life? How do styles of writing/public address determine our relationship to different publics? We will read work by M. Burawoy, B. Agger, C. W. Mills, among others. The workshop component of the course will involve participating in the production of Contexts, the ASA’s hybrid magazine/journal which is dedicated to disseminating translating sociological work to broader publics. The magazine is now housed at Rutgers (and at Seattle University). Students in this course will learn about the production of the magazine from the inside, and actually participate in writing, editing, image selection, and other tasks. The course will: 1) deepen students’ substantive expertise in cutting‐edge sociological scholarship; 2) guide them in developing writing skills that address academic and non‐academic audiences; 3) engage in critical and constructive discussion of the field of sociology; 4) provide an inside view of the journal reviewing and editorial decision‐making. And they may even get their work published! Required books: Dan Clawson, Robert Zussman, et al, eds., Public Sociology (California 2007) Barbara Ehrenreich, Nickel and Dimed (Holt 2002) Requirements: Do the reading, participate in discussion, and contribute: 1) an “in brief” piece for Contexts 2) a blog entry 3) a podcast for Contexts.org ** Note: Syllabus subject to change January 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Why a Public Anthropology? Notes and References
    WHY A PUBLIC ANTHROPOLOGY? NOTES AND REFERENCES While the placement of notes and references online is still relatively rare, they are quite easy to examine in a PDF online format. Readers should use find (or control F) with a fragment of the quote to discover the cited reference. In a number of cases, I have added additional material so advanced readers, if they wish, can explore the issue in greater depth. Find can also be used to track down relevant citations, explore a topic of interest, or locate a particular section (e.g. Chapter 2 or 3.4). May I make a request? Since this Notes and References section contains over 1,300 references, it is likely that, despite my best efforts, there are still incomplete references and errors. I would appreciate readers pointing them out to me, especially since I can, in most cases, readily correct them. Thank you. Readers can email me at [email protected]. Quotes from Jim Yong Kim: On Leadership , Washington Post (April 1, 2010, listed as March 31, 2010) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- dyn/content/video/2010/03/31/VI2010033100606.html?hpid=smartliving CHAPTER 1 1.1 Bronislaw Malinowski, a prominent early twentieth century anthropologist, famously stated his goal in anthropology was "to grasp the native's point of view, his relation to life, to realize his vision of his world" (1961 [1922]:25) To do this, he lived as a participant-observer for roughly two years – between 1915-1918 – among the Trobriand Islanders of Papua New Guinea (in the South Pacific). Quoting him (1961[1922]:7-8): There is all the difference between a sporadic plunging into the company of natives, and being really in contact with them.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Feature Current Anthropology
    CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY A world journal of the sciences of man Current Anthropology is an international and interdisciplinary forum for scholarly work in the social sciences, publishing significant research, theoretical statements, and critical analyses in such fields as physical and social anthropology, ethnology and ethnohistory, folklore and linguistics, archaeology and prehistory. Appearing in the journal are articles that not only communicate across the subdisciplines of anthropology but also reveal a firm control of contemporary thought and issues. Representative articles include: Georges Mounin, Language, Communication, Chimpanzees James N. Kerri, Studying Voluntary Associations as Adaptive Mechanisms Erik Cohen, Environmental Orientations: A Multidimensional Approach to Social Ecology Karl L. Hutterer, An Evolutionary Approach to the Southeast Asian Cultural Sequence Robert McGhee, Differential Artistic Productivity in the Eskimo Cuhural Tradition Ramkrisltna Muldierjee, The Value-Base of Social Anthropology: The Context of India in Particular A new feature All major articles will be followed by abstracts in English, French, Spanish, and Russian. Current Anthropology: One-year subscription order Institutions: $25.00 (A*) D Associates* $12.00 (A) D $17.50 (Bf:) D $ 7.00(B) n Individuals: $18.00 (A) D Students: $ 8.00(A) D $12.50(8) D (with faculty $ 5.00(B) D signature) *RateA: USA, Canada, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Japan tRate B: All other countries **Associates: Teachers or researchers in anthropology and related disciplines may subscribe at the special rate upon recommendation ot an Associate of the journal. For information write to the Editor, c/o the address below. Name Address City . State . Country Please mail with your check or purchase order to Current Anthropology, The University of Chicago Press, 11030 Langley Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60628 SES is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to critical studies in Southwest regional develop­ ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Pedagogy of Public Criminology
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Towards a Pedagogy of Public Criminology Claire Hamilton School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland Corresponding author: Dr Claire Hamilton, Lecturer in Criminology, School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, 6 College Park, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland BT7 1LP Email: [email protected], Phone: +44 (0)28 9097 5318, Fax: +44 (0)28 9097 3943 Abstract In light of recent debates on ‘public criminology’, this article chooses to focus on teaching as a way of reaching more publics. The various characteristics of a more public and engaged discipline are discussed and applied specifically to the teaching of criminology, including the relative merits and demerits of reorienting teaching in this way. Following on from this discussion, the article outlines some practical ways in which this vision can be realised. Given the many affinities between the Burawoyan concept of public ‘-ologies’ and the scholarship of learning and teaching, an argument is advanced for teaching as one of the first steps towards the practice of a more public criminology. Keywords: public criminology, pedagogy, practice implications “But where is the student? ... How can an analysis of the success/failure paradox of criminology ... be complete without criminology’s role in education and the ways student attitudes, experiences and careers become part of publicness?” Walters 2011, pp732–733 Introduction The concept of ‘public sociology’, qua an approach to sociology that aims to communicate with and actively engage wider audiences, has been hotly debated within the academy in recent years (Burawoy 2005). This has sparked analogous debates in the criminological field on the appropriate role and value of criminology in democratic society, or, as Loader & Sparks have termed it, the discipline’s role as a ‘democratic under-labourer’ (Garland & Sparks 2000, Groombridge 2009, Loader & Sparks 2010).
    [Show full text]