DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition Light Business Jet Family Design

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017 Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition Light Business Jet Family Design 2017 Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition Light Business Jet Family Design 2016 – 2017 AIAA Design Competition Proposal Light Business Jet Family Design Georgia Institute of Technology Team Members AIAA Numbers Signature Daniel Wise 808961 Avery Leonard 808867 Katie Zhang 511449 David Twibell 480373 Michelle Ku 808919 Pamir Sevincel 819687 Thomas Rainey 593555 Advisors: Dr. Neil Weston Carl Johnson 1. Table of Contents 1. Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................... i 2. List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... iii 3. List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... v 4. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 5. Proposal Requirement .............................................................................................................. 2 6. Market Research ...................................................................................................................... 2 7. Conceptual Design ................................................................................................................... 5 Configuration Selection ............................................................................................................................ 5 Weight Sizing ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Constraint Sizing ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Fuselage Configuration ........................................................................................................................... 15 Wing ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 Airfoil ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 High Lift Devices .................................................................................................................................... 22 Empennage .............................................................................................................................................. 26 Propulsion ............................................................................................................................................... 32 Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) .................................................................................................................. 33 8. Performance ........................................................................................................................... 33 Aerodynamics ......................................................................................................................................... 33 Takeoff .................................................................................................................................................... 36 Range ...................................................................................................................................................... 37 V-N Diagram .......................................................................................................................................... 39 9. Structure and Manufacturing ................................................................................................. 39 Material ................................................................................................................................................... 39 Wing Structure ........................................................................................................................................ 41 Static Analysis ........................................................................................................................................ 42 Landing Gear .......................................................................................................................................... 44 10. Weight and Balance ........................................................................................................... 46 i 8S Weight and Balance ........................................................................................................................... 46 6S Weight and Balance ........................................................................................................................... 51 Fuselage Manufacturing .......................................................................................................................... 53 11. Stability and Control .......................................................................................................... 54 Stability Augmentation System .............................................................................................................. 62 12. Subsystems ......................................................................................................................... 67 Hydraulics ............................................................................................................................................... 67 Electric .................................................................................................................................................... 68 Fuel ......................................................................................................................................................... 69 Pneumatic ................................................................................................................................................ 70 13. Interior................................................................................................................................ 71 Cockpit/Flight Deck Design .................................................................................................................... 71 Cabin Design ........................................................................................................................................... 72 Cabin Options ......................................................................................................................................... 73 Economy Layout ..................................................................................................................................... 73 Executive Layout .................................................................................................................................... 75 Utility Layout .......................................................................................................................................... 75 Medical Layout ....................................................................................................................................... 76 14. Cost and Finances .............................................................................................................. 77 Eastlake Cost Estimation Model ............................................................................................................. 77 Developmental Costs .............................................................................................................................. 78 Operational Costs .................................................................................................................................... 83 15. Aircraft Dimensions ........................................................................................................... 86 ii 2. List of Figures Figure 1. Runways in the United States by length ........................................................................................ 3 Figure 2. In-Service Light Business Jet Takeoff Distances Compared to Passenger Count ......................... 4 Figure 3. In-Service Light Business Jet Takeoff Distances Compared to Max Cruise Speed ...................... 4 Figure 4. In-Service Light Business Jet Takeoff Distances Compared to Range ......................................... 5 Figure 5. Possible Configuration Choices..................................................................................................... 6 Figure 6: Weight Regression of In-Service Light Business Jets ................................................................... 9 Figure 7: Mission Profile as Described by AIAA ....................................................................................... 10 Figure 8: Roskam Preliminary Design Process ........................................................................................... 11 Figure 9: Energy Based Constraint Sizing .................................................................................................. 14 Figure 10: Runway Clearance ..................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 11. Fuselage Dimensions for 6-Seater ............................................................................................. 17 Figure 12. Fuselage Dimensions for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University of Oklahoma Graduate College Design and Performance Evaluation of a Retractable Wingtip Vortex Reduction Device a Th
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A RETRACTABLE WINGTIP VORTEX REDUCTION DEVICE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Mechanical Engineering By Tausif Jamal Norman, OK 2019 DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A RETRACTABLE WINGTIP VORTEX REDUCTION DEVICE A THESIS APPROVED FOR THE SCHOOL OF AEROSPACE AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING BY THE COMMITTEE CONSISTING OF Dr. D. Keith Walters, Chair Dr. Hamidreza Shabgard Dr. Prakash Vedula ©Copyright by Tausif Jamal 2019 All Rights Reserved. ABSTRACT As an airfoil achieves lift, the pressure differential at the wingtips trigger the roll up of fluid which results in swirling wakes. This wake is characterized by the presence of strong rotating cylindrical vortices that can persist for miles. Since large aircrafts can generate strong vortices, airports require a minimum separation between two aircrafts to ensure safe take-off and landing. Recently, there have been considerable efforts to address the effects of wingtip vortices such as the categorization of expected wake turbulence for commercial aircrafts to optimize the wait times during take-off and landing. However, apart from the implementation of winglets, there has been little effort to address the issue of wingtip vortices via minimal changes to airfoil design. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of a newly proposed retractable wingtip vortex reduction device for commercial aircrafts. The proposed design consists of longitudinal slits placed in the streamwise direction near the wingtip to reduce the pressure differential between the pressure and the suction sides.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrically Heated Composite Leading Edges for Aircraft Anti-Icing Applications”
    UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES “FEDERICO II” PhD course in Aerospace, Naval and Quality Engineering PhD Thesis in Aerospace Engineering “ELECTRICALLY HEATED COMPOSITE LEADING EDGES FOR AIRCRAFT ANTI-ICING APPLICATIONS” by Francesco De Rosa 2010 To my girlfriend Tiziana for her patience and understanding precious and rare human virtues University of Naples Federico II Department of Aerospace Engineering DIAS PhD Thesis in Aerospace Engineering Author: F. De Rosa Tutor: Prof. G.P. Russo PhD course in Aerospace, Naval and Quality Engineering XXIII PhD course in Aerospace Engineering, 2008-2010 PhD course coordinator: Prof. A. Moccia ___________________________________________________________________________ Francesco De Rosa - Electrically Heated Composite Leading Edges for Aircraft Anti-Icing Applications 2 Abstract An investigation was conducted in the Aerospace Engineering Department (DIAS) at Federico II University of Naples aiming to evaluate the feasibility and the performance of an electrically heated composite leading edge for anti-icing and de-icing applications. A 283 [mm] chord NACA0012 airfoil prototype was designed, manufactured and equipped with an High Temperature composite leading edge with embedded Ni-Cr heating element. The heating element was fed by a DC power supply unit and the average power densities supplied to the leading edge were ranging 1.0 to 30.0 [kW m-2]. The present investigation focused on thermal tests experimentally performed under fixed icing conditions with zero AOA, Mach=0.2, total temperature of -20 [°C], liquid water content LWC=0.6 [g m-3] and average mean volume droplet diameter MVD=35 [µm]. These fixed conditions represented the top icing performance of the Icing Flow Facility (IFF) available at DIAS and therefore it has represented the “sizing design case” for the tested prototype.
    [Show full text]
  • EWIS Practices Job Aid 2.0
    Aircraft EWIS Practices Job Aid 2.0 Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Electrical Wiring Interconnect System (EWIS) Best Practices Job Aid Revision: 2.0 This job aid covers applicable 14 CFR part 25 aircraft (although it is also widely acceptable for use with other types of aircraft such as military, small airplanes, and rotorcraft). This job aid addresses policy; industry EWIS practices; primary factors associated with EWIS degradation; information on TC/STC data package requirements; EWIS selection and protection; routing, splicing and termination practices; and EWIS maintenance concepts (including how to perform a EWIS general visual inspection). The job aid also includes numerous actual aircraft EWIS photos and examples. UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED 1 Aircraft EWIS Practices Job Aid 2.0 Additional Notes • This presentation contains additional speaker notes for most slides • It’s advisable to read these notes while viewing the slide presentation Aircraft EWIS Best Practices Job Aid 2.0 Federal Aviation 2 Administration UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED 2 Aircraft EWIS Practices Job Aid 2.0 Printing the Additional Notes To print the slides and accompanying speaker notes: – Navigate back to the FAA Aircraft Certification job aids web page – Open and print Printable Slides and Notes Aircraft EWIS Best Practices Job Aid 2.0 Federal Aviation 3 Administration UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED 3 Aircraft EWIS Practices Job Aid 2.0 Background • Why the need for EWIS best practices Job Aid? – Accident/Incident Service History – Aging Transport Systems Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ATSRAC) – Enhanced Airworthiness Program for Airplane System (EAPAS) – EAPAS Rule Making Aircraft EWIS Best Practices Job Aid 2.0 Federal Aviation 4 Administration Historically, wiring and associated components were installed without much thought given to the aging aspects: • Fit and forget.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Study of a Supersonic Business Jet with Variable Sweep Wings
    27TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES DESIGN STUDY OF A SUPERSONIC BUSINESS JET WITH VARIABLE SWEEP WINGS E.Jesse, J.Dijkstra ADSE b.v. Keywords: swing wing, supersonic, business jet, variable sweepback Abstract A design study for a supersonic business jet with variable sweep wings is presented. A comparison with a fixed wing design with the same technology level shows the fundamental differences. It is concluded that a variable sweep design will show worthwhile advantages over fixed wing solutions. 1 General Introduction Fig. 1 Artist impression variable sweep design AD1104 In the EU 6th framework project HISAC (High Speed AirCraft) technologies have been studied to enable the design and development of an 2 The HISAC project environmentally acceptable Small Supersonic The HISAC project is a 6th framework project Business Jet (SSBJ). In this context a for the European Union to investigate the conceptual design with a variable sweep wing technical feasibility of an environmentally has been developed by ADSE, with support acceptable small size supersonic transport from Sukhoi, Dassault Aviation, TsAGI, NLR aircraft. With a budget of 27.5 M€ and 37 and DLR. The objective of this was to assess the partners in 13 countries this 4 year effort value of such a configuration for a possible combined much of the European industry and future SSBJ programme, and to identify critical knowledge centres. design and certification areas should such a configuration prove to be advantageous. To provide a framework for the different studies and investigations foreseen in the HISAC This paper presents the resulting design project a number of aircraft concept designs including the relevant considerations which were defined, which would all meet at least the determined the selected configuration.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Cirrus Vision SF50
    2018 Cirrus Vision SF50 Serial Number: 0034 Registration: N3AD [email protected] +1.848.220.9370 Specifications are subject to verification by purchaser. Aircraft is subject to prior sale, and/or removal from market without notice. 2018 Cirrus Vision SF50 0034 Highlights: Interior: Refurbished Feb 2020 6 Passenger G1 Wing Modification (9/2020) Executive Seats ADS-B Out/In New Paint currently in progress Black Leather Interior with armrests Garmin FlightStream Enhanced Awareness Package Executive Cabin configuration JetStream Concierge Package Premium Luxury Package USB Power Ports Rear Climate Control 22” Entertainment Display Airframe: 115VAC Power Outlets Enhanced Dimmable Lighting Air Conditioning with Automatic Climate Control CAPS 260 Cycles Noise reduction upgrade Jetstream Concierge Package 280 Hours Engine: FJ33—5A Exterior: New Paint in Progress 280 Hours JetStream Concierge Program(2 Years or 300 hours) Gold Reflective Cockpit and Cabin Windows Base: White Performance Accent: Grey Cargo Xtend 300lb. Baggage Capacity Takeoff – 2036ft (620m) Max Altitude – 28,000 ft Climb Rate - 1609 ft./min. Stall Speed with Flaps – 67 knots Max Cruise Speed – 300 KTAS Landing Ground roll – 1 ft. (496m) [email protected] +1.848.220.9370 2 Specifications are subject to verification by purchaser. Aircraft is subject to prior sale, and/or removal from market without notice. 2018 Cirrus Vision SF50 0034 Packages: Pro-Pilot Package : GFC 700 Autopilot including: Traffic Avoidance System Electronic Stability & Protection (ESP) Terrain Awareness Emergency Descent Mode AHRS & Air Data Computer Blue Level Button Digital Transponder Autopilot Stall Protection Co-Pilot Q.D. Oxygen Electronic Manuals Enhanced Awareness Package: Productivity Package : Digital Real-Time Weather Radar Wifi Ground Link Enhanced Vision System Camera Perspective Global Connect Surface Watch Enhanced Datalink Wx Chart View [email protected] +1.848.220.9370 3 Specifications are subject to verification by purchaser.
    [Show full text]
  • Cirrus Vision SF50 Is a Very Light Jet Originally Designed and Manufactured by Cirrus Aircraft, Based in Minnesota, USA
    X-Plane 11 Cirrus SF50 Pilot’s Operating Manual Author: Julian Lockwood ([email protected]) Copyright: Laminar Research 2020 Disclaimer The information contained in this document is for simulation use only, within the X-Plane flight simulator. This document is not subject to revision and has not been checked for accuracy. This document is intended for entertainment only and may not to be used in situations involving real-life aircraft, or real-life aviation. Distribution This document may be copied and distributed by Laminar Research customers and developers, for entertainment. It may also be distributed with third-party content developed for X-Plane 11. 1 Contents Background: The Cirrus SF50 ................................................................................................................... 4 Cirrus SF50 Specifications .................................................................................................................... 5 The X-Plane SF50 ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Views and Controls .................................................................................................................................. 7 Creating “Quick Look” views ................................................................................................................ 8 Operating the controls ....................................................................................................................... 11
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study of a Multi-Purpose Aircraft Concept with a Leading-Edge Cross-Flow Fan
    Dissertations and Theses 5-2018 Feasibility Study of a Multi-Purpose Aircraft Concept with a Leading-Edge Cross-Flow Fan Stanislav Karpuk Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/edt Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Karpuk, Stanislav, "Feasibility Study of a Multi-Purpose Aircraft Concept with a Leading-Edge Cross-Flow Fan" (2018). Dissertations and Theses. 399. https://commons.erau.edu/edt/399 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A MULTI-PURPOSE AIRCRAFT CONCEPT WITH A LEADING-EDGE CROSS-FLOW FAN A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University by Stanislav Karpuk In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering May 2018 Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, Florida i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr Gudmundsson and Dr Golubev for their knowledge, guidance and advising they provided during these two years of the program. I also would like to thank my committee member Dr Engblom for his advice and recommendations. I also want to thank Petr and Marina Kazarin for their support, help and the opportunity to enjoy the Russian community for those two years. This project would not be possible without strong computational power available in ERAU, so I would like to thank all staff and faculty who contributed to development and support of the VEGA cluster.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA-H-8083-3A, Airplane Flying Handbook -- 3 of 7 Files
    Ch 04.qxd 5/7/04 6:46 AM Page 4-1 NTRODUCTION Maneuvering during slow flight should be performed I using both instrument indications and outside visual The maintenance of lift and control of an airplane in reference. Slow flight should be practiced from straight flight requires a certain minimum airspeed. This glides, straight-and-level flight, and from medium critical airspeed depends on certain factors, such as banked gliding and level flight turns. Slow flight at gross weight, load factors, and existing density altitude. approach speeds should include slowing the airplane The minimum speed below which further controlled smoothly and promptly from cruising to approach flight is impossible is called the stalling speed. An speeds without changes in altitude or heading, and important feature of pilot training is the development determining and using appropriate power and trim of the ability to estimate the margin of safety above the settings. Slow flight at approach speed should also stalling speed. Also, the ability to determine the include configuration changes, such as landing gear characteristic responses of any airplane at different and flaps, while maintaining heading and altitude. airspeeds is of great importance to the pilot. The student pilot, therefore, must develop this awareness in FLIGHT AT MINIMUM CONTROLLABLE order to safely avoid stalls and to operate an airplane AIRSPEED This maneuver demonstrates the flight characteristics correctly and safely at slow airspeeds. and degree of controllability of the airplane at its minimum flying speed. By definition, the term “flight SLOW FLIGHT at minimum controllable airspeed” means a speed at Slow flight could be thought of, by some, as a speed which any further increase in angle of attack or load that is less than cruise.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies Volume 10, Number 2
    2010 International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies Volume 10, Number 2 Federal Aviation Administration International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies A Publication of the FAA Academy Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Volume 10, Number 2 2010 blank page REVIEW PROCESS The Federal Aviation Administration Academy provides traceability and oversight for each step of the International Journal of Applied Aviation Stud- ies (IJAAS). IJAAS is a peer-reviewed publication, enlisting the support of an international panel of consulting editors. Each consulting editor was chosen for his or her expertise in one or more areas of interest in aviation. Using the blind-review process, three or more consulting editors are selected to ap- praise each article, judging whether or not it meets the requirements of this publication. In addition to an overall appraisal, a Likert scale is used to mea- sure attitudes regarding individual segments of each article. Articles that are accepted are those that were approved by a majority of judges. Articles that do not meet IJAAS requirements for publication are released back to their author or authors. Individuals wishing to obtain a copy of the IJAAS on CD may contact Kay Chisholm by email at [email protected], or by telephone at (405) 954- 3264, or by writing to the following address: International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies Kay Chisholm AMA-800 PO Box 25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125 POLICY AND DISCLAIMERS Policy Statement: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Academy strongly supports aca- demic freedom and a researcher’s right to publish; therefore, the Federal Aviation Administration Academy as an institution does not endorse the viewpoint or guarantee the technical correctness of any of the articles in this journal.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Landing Gear Arrangement of an Aircraft
    ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print): 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (A High Impact Factor & UGC Approved Journal) Website: www.ijirset.com Vol. 6, Issue 8, August 2017 A Study on Landing Gear Arrangement of an Aircraft Mohammad Afwan1, Danish S. Memon2, Yuvraj G. Pawar3, Shubham P. Kainge4 UG Students (B.E), Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, PRMIT&R, Amravati, India ABSTRACT: Landing gear is a vital structural unit of an aircraft which enables to take off and land safely on the ground. A variety of landing gear arrangements are used depending on the type and size of an aircraft. The most common type is the tri-cycle arrangement with one nose landing gear unit and two main landing gear units. Even during a normal landing operation heavy loads (equal to the weight of an aircraft) are to be absorbed by the landing gear. In turn joints are to be provided such that heavy concentrated loads are first received by the airframe and subsequently diffused to the surrounding areas. Normally heavy concentrated loads are received through a lug joint. Therefore design of a lug joint against failure under static and fatigue loading conditions assumes importance in the development of an aircraft structure. KEYWORDS: Landing Gear types and Arrangement. I. INTRODUCTION Aircraft is machine that is able to fly from one place to another place. Many researches were made to fly the machine since from mythology, many had lost their life during their experiments, and many failed to fly their machine. But finally in 1910 Wright Brothers build machine which is able to fly for 59seconds, which is very short duration but it is first milestone for development of aviation.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Test of the F/A-18 Active Aeroelastic Wing Airplane
    Flight Test of the F/A-18 Active Aeroelastic Wing Airplane Robert Clarke,* Michael J. Allen,† and Ryan P. Dibley‡ NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, Edwards, California 93523 Joseph Gera§ Analytical Services & Material, Inc., Edwards, California 93523 and John Hodgkinson¶ Spiral Technology, Inc., Edwards, California 93523 Successful flight-testing of the Active Aeroelastic Wing airplane was completed in March 2005. This program, which started in 1996, was a joint activity sponsored by NASA, Air Force Research Laboratory, and industry contractors. The test program contained two flight test phases conducted in early 2003 and early 2005. During the first phase of flight test, aerodynamic models and load models of the wing control surfaces and wing structure were developed. Design teams built new research control laws for the Active Aeroelastic Wing airplane using these flight-validated models; and throughout the final phase of flight test, these new control laws were demonstrated. The control laws were designed to optimize strategies for moving the wing control surfaces to maximize roll rates in the transonic and supersonic flight regimes. Control surface hinge moments and wing loads were constrained to remain within hydraulic and load limits. This paper describes briefly the flight control system architecture as well as the design approach used by Active Aeroelastic Wing project engineers to develop flight control system gains. Additionally, this paper presents flight test techniques and comparison between flight test results and predictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 --- Ice and Rain Protection System
    Vol. 1 15--00--1 ICE AND RAIN PROTECTION SYSTEM Table of Contents REV 3, May 03/05 CHAPTER 15 --- ICE AND RAIN PROTECTION SYSTEM Page TABLE OF CONTENTS 15--00 Table of Contents 15--00--1 INTRODUCTION 15--10 Introduction 15--10--1 ICE DETECTION SYSTEM 15--20 Ice Detection System 15--20--1 System Circuit Breakers 15--20--5 WING ANTI-ICE SYSTEM 15--30 Wing Anti--Ice System 15--30--1 System Circuit Breakers 15--30--6 ENGINE COWL ANTI-ICE SYSTEM 15--40 Engine Cowl Anti--Ice System 15--40--1 System Circuit Breakers 15--40--5 AIR DATA ANTI-ICE SYSTEM 15--50 Air Data Anti--Ice System 15--50--1 System Circuit Breakers 15--50--4 WINDSHIELD AND SIDE WINDOW ANTI-ICE SYSTEM 15--60 Windshield and Side Window Anti--Ice System 15--60--1 System Circuit Breakers 15--60--5 WINDSHIELD WIPER SYSTEM 15--70 Windshield Wiper System 15--70--1 System Circuit Breakers 15--70--2 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS INTRODUCTION Figure 15--10--1 Anti--Iced Areas 15--10--2 ICE DETECTION SYSTEM Figure 15--20--1 Ice Detection System -- Schematic 15--20--2 Figure 15--20--2 Ice Detection System 15--20--3 Figure 15--20--3 Anti--Ice System EICAS Indications 15--20--4 Flight Crew Operating Manual CSP C--013--067 Vol. 1 15--00--2 ICE AND RAIN PROTECTION SYSTEM Table of Contents REV 3, May 03/05 WING ANTI-ICE SYSTEM Figure 15--30--1 Wing Anti--Ice System Schematic 15--30--2 Figure 15--30--2 Wing Anti--Ice Controls 15--30--3 Figure 15--30--3 Anti--Ice Synoptic Page 15--30--4 Figure 15--30--4 Wing Anti--Ice System EICAS Indications 15--30--5 ENGINE COWL ANTI-ICE SYSTEM Figure 15--40--1 Engine
    [Show full text]