DOCSLIB.ORG

International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies Volume 10, Number 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies Volume 10, Number 2 2010 International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies Volume 10, Number 2 Federal Aviation Administration International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies A Publication of the FAA Academy Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Volume 10, Number 2 2010 blank page REVIEW PROCESS The Federal Aviation Administration Academy provides traceability and oversight for each step of the International Journal of Applied Aviation Stud- ies (IJAAS). IJAAS is a peer-reviewed publication, enlisting the support of an international panel of consulting editors. Each consulting editor was chosen for his or her expertise in one or more areas of interest in aviation. Using the blind-review process, three or more consulting editors are selected to ap- praise each article, judging whether or not it meets the requirements of this publication. In addition to an overall appraisal, a Likert scale is used to mea- sure attitudes regarding individual segments of each article. Articles that are accepted are those that were approved by a majority of judges. Articles that do not meet IJAAS requirements for publication are released back to their author or authors. Individuals wishing to obtain a copy of the IJAAS on CD may contact Kay Chisholm by email at [email protected], or by telephone at (405) 954- 3264, or by writing to the following address: International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies Kay Chisholm AMA-800 PO Box 25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125 POLICY AND DISCLAIMERS Policy Statement: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Academy strongly supports aca- demic freedom and a researcher’s right to publish; therefore, the Federal Aviation Administration Academy as an institution does not endorse the viewpoint or guarantee the technical correctness of any of the articles in this journal. Disclaimer of Liability: With respect to articles available in this journal, neither the United States Government nor the Federal Aviation Administration Academy nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Disclaimer of Endorsement: Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the Federal Aviation Administration Academy. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not state or reflect those of the United States Government or the Federal Aviation Administration, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. PUBLISHER Academy Superintendent (Acting) Sunny Lee-Fanning Deputy Superintendent (Acting) William J. Mumper PUBLICATION COMMITTEE Manager, Regulatory Standards Division David Long Manager, Technical Operations Training Division Jessie McMullen Manager, Air Traffic Division William J. Mumper Manager, Airports & International Training Division Sherry Reese EDITORIAL STAFF Managing Editor Kay Chisholm Associate Editor Deann King IJAAS Founding Editor and Research Consultant Todd P. Hubbard CONSULTING EDITORS International Ruwantissa I.R. Abeyratne ICAO, Montreal, Canada Alireza Ahmadi Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden Alan A. Baker CRC-ACS, Victoria , Australia Pierre R. Band Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Québec, Canada James Barker Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Simon Bennett Institute of Lifelong Learning, Leicester, UK Henk Blom National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Robert Bor Royal Free Hospital, London, UK Peter Brooker Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK Bryan Burke Macquaire University, Sydney, Australia Ing. F.J.L. Bussink National Aerospace Laboratory, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Petr Cásek Honeywell International Advanced Technology Center, Czech Republic Michael B. Charles Southern Cross University, Tweed Heads, NSW Australia Klaus Christoffersen Acuite, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Desmond M. Connolly QinetiQ, Farnborough, Hampshire, UK Finian Connolly Executive & Professional Training Inst., Drogheda, Co Louth, Ireland Hugh David Eurocontrol, East Sussex, UK Sidney Dekker Linköping Institute of Technology, Linköping, Sweden David Denyer Cranfield University, Bedford, UK Teresa C. D’Oliveira ISPA, Lisbon, Portugal Robert van Doorn Universiteit Maastricht, The Netherlands Åsa Ek Lund University, Lund, Sweden Alois Farthofer Human Factors Research, St. Georgen, Austria Massimo Felici University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Rodney Fewings Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire UK Gerard J. Fogarty University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia Jarle Gimmestad Braathens Airlines, Fornebu, Norway Eric L. Groen TNO Defence, Soesterberg, The Netherlands Gael P. Hammer Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany Don Harris Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, UK Irene Henley University of Western Sidney, Sidney, Australia Ivonne A. Herrera SINTEF Technology & Society Safety Research, Trondheim, Norway Toshio Hirose Sendai Nishikicho Clinic & Occupational Health Center, Sendai, Japan Eef Hogervorst Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK Alexandra Holmes Clockwork Research Ltd., London, UK Hans-Jürgen Hörmann Deutsches Zentrum für Luftund Raumfahrt (DLR), Hamburg, Germany Graham Hunt Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand Magnus Jacobssen Linköping Institute of Technology, Linköping, Sweden Milan Janic Delft University of Technology, Delft,The Netherlands Lynn M. Jeffrey Massey University Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Chris W. Johnson University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland K. Wolfgang Kallus Karl Franzens University, Graz, Austria Michael John Kay RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Jörg Leonhardt Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH, Langen, Germany Dirk Lehmkuhl University of St. Gallenm, St.Gallen, Switzerland George Leloudas Gates and Partners Solicitors, London, UK Wen-Chin Li National Defense University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. Zaira Marioli-Riga Hellenic Aerospace Industry S.A., Schimatari, Greece Monica Martinussen University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway Elizabeth Mathews Aviation English Services, Wellington, New Zealand Jeremy Mell French Embassy, Washington, DC Jim Mitchell University of Western Sydney, Penrith South, Australia Kjell Mjøs Norwegian University of Science and Technology,Oslo, Norway Brett Molesworth University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia David G. Newman Flight Medicine Systems PTY LTD, Victoria, Australia Jan Noyes University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Paul O’Connor National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland David O’Hare University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand Esther Oprins Air Traffic Control Netherlands, Schiphol Airport, Netherlands Günther Ortmann Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Hamburg, Germany Christine Owen University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia Michal Pěchouček Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic Stefanie Petrie Luftwaffe Institute of Aviation Medicine, Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany Andrew Potter Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK Teemu Reiman VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Otaniemi, Finland Andrew N. Rider The Defence Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO), Victoria , Australia Alfred Roelen National Aerospace Laboratory, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Jan Joris Roessingh National Aerospace Laboratory, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Jens Rolfsen Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway Paul Roosens University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium Michael Siegrist Institute for Environmental Decisions, Zurich, Switzerland T. Leigh Signal Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand Adrian Smith Aeromedical Centre, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Richard H. Y. So University of Essex, Colchester, UK Manuel Soler Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain Sybert Stroeve NLR Air Transport Safety Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Shinji Suzuki University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Hakan Tarakci Melbourne Business School, Melbourne, Australia Steve Thatcher University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, Australia M. “Mattie” Tops Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands Claudia van de Wal VALK Foundation, Netherlands Lucas van Gerwen VALK Foundation, Netherlands Leo Vermeulen University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa Joachim Vogt Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany Anthony S. Wagstaff Institute of Aviation Medicine, Oslo, Norway Stephen Walsh Interaction Training Associates, Netherlands Mark Wiggins Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia Damien J. Williams University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Robert Wolfger Austrian Airlines, Strasshof, Austria Rogier Woltjer Linköping Institute of Technology, Linköping, Sweden Jin-Ru Yen National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan, ROC Beat Zimmermann Air Navigation Institute, Thun, Switzerland U.S.A. Robert I. Aceves St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, MN Vicki Ahlstrom FAA, William J. Hughes Technical Center, Atlantic City, NJ Amy Alexander Aptima, Inc., Woburn, MA Steve Anderson St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, MN Rick Anglemyer SCSI, Colorado Springs, CO Anthony R. Artino, Jr. Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD Francis “Frank” Ayers Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, AZ Larry Bailey FAA Academy, Oklahoma City, OK Jack Barker Mach One Leadership, Miami, FL R. Kurt Barnhart Kansas State
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2018 Cirrus Vision SF50
    2018 Cirrus Vision SF50 Serial Number: 0034 Registration: N3AD [email protected] +1.848.220.9370 Specifications are subject to verification by purchaser. Aircraft is subject to prior sale, and/or removal from market without notice. 2018 Cirrus Vision SF50 0034 Highlights: Interior: Refurbished Feb 2020 6 Passenger G1 Wing Modification (9/2020) Executive Seats ADS-B Out/In New Paint currently in progress Black Leather Interior with armrests Garmin FlightStream Enhanced Awareness Package Executive Cabin configuration JetStream Concierge Package Premium Luxury Package USB Power Ports Rear Climate Control 22” Entertainment Display Airframe: 115VAC Power Outlets Enhanced Dimmable Lighting Air Conditioning with Automatic Climate Control CAPS 260 Cycles Noise reduction upgrade Jetstream Concierge Package 280 Hours Engine: FJ33—5A Exterior: New Paint in Progress 280 Hours JetStream Concierge Program(2 Years or 300 hours) Gold Reflective Cockpit and Cabin Windows Base: White Performance Accent: Grey Cargo Xtend 300lb. Baggage Capacity Takeoff – 2036ft (620m) Max Altitude – 28,000 ft Climb Rate - 1609 ft./min. Stall Speed with Flaps – 67 knots Max Cruise Speed – 300 KTAS Landing Ground roll – 1 ft. (496m) [email protected] +1.848.220.9370 2 Specifications are subject to verification by purchaser. Aircraft is subject to prior sale, and/or removal from market without notice. 2018 Cirrus Vision SF50 0034 Packages: Pro-Pilot Package : GFC 700 Autopilot including: Traffic Avoidance System Electronic Stability & Protection (ESP) Terrain Awareness Emergency Descent Mode AHRS & Air Data Computer Blue Level Button Digital Transponder Autopilot Stall Protection Co-Pilot Q.D. Oxygen Electronic Manuals Enhanced Awareness Package: Productivity Package : Digital Real-Time Weather Radar Wifi Ground Link Enhanced Vision System Camera Perspective Global Connect Surface Watch Enhanced Datalink Wx Chart View [email protected] +1.848.220.9370 3 Specifications are subject to verification by purchaser.
    [Show full text]
  • Cirrus Vision SF50 Is a Very Light Jet Originally Designed and Manufactured by Cirrus Aircraft, Based in Minnesota, USA
    X-Plane 11 Cirrus SF50 Pilot’s Operating Manual Author: Julian Lockwood ([email protected]) Copyright: Laminar Research 2020 Disclaimer The information contained in this document is for simulation use only, within the X-Plane flight simulator. This document is not subject to revision and has not been checked for accuracy. This document is intended for entertainment only and may not to be used in situations involving real-life aircraft, or real-life aviation. Distribution This document may be copied and distributed by Laminar Research customers and developers, for entertainment. It may also be distributed with third-party content developed for X-Plane 11. 1 Contents Background: The Cirrus SF50 ................................................................................................................... 4 Cirrus SF50 Specifications .................................................................................................................... 5 The X-Plane SF50 ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Views and Controls .................................................................................................................................. 7 Creating “Quick Look” views ................................................................................................................ 8 Operating the controls ....................................................................................................................... 11
    [Show full text]
  • Business Aviation a Boardroom Issue
    MAKING BUSINESS AVIATION A BOARDROOM ISSUE SPECIAL PRE-PRINT REPORT BY FIRST MAGAZINE, CELEBRATING EBACE 2017 An Ever-Resilient Industry Readies For A Much-Needed Rebound usiness Aviation has had its share of partnership with NBAA hosting the annual billion in time saved annually by European ups and downs certainly, but being European Business Aviation Convention companies using business aviation for their Ba cyclical industry and subject to the & Exhibition (EBACE) also shared the employees; and EUR 2,840 in average whims of global economic conditions, it good news that business aviation traffic productivity gains per passenger, per trip. has remained resilient and persistent over figures rose for the fifth consecutive (For more information, visit www.ebaa.org.) the years. Industry leaders have learned to month in March compared to the same cope amazingly well, under the most trying period in 2016. As Brandon Mitchener, Manufacturers’ R&D Investments Drive conditions. As Ed Bolen, President and the recently appointed Chief Executive Business Aviation Industry CEO of NBAA (National Business Aviation Officer of EBAA was pleased to report, In a sense, manufacturers are continuing to Association) notes, “It’s almost impossible “After several years of sluggish growth, the create their own “pent-up demand” for new to predict what we’ll see on the world stage signs are favourable for a new direction in products and technologies across all sectors over the next several years. But reliable 2017, with first quarter traffic figures up of the industry, while lending a measure indicators do point to continued, measured 6.7 percent from a year ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Cirrus Vision SF50 Update
    PERSONAL JET Cirrus Vision SF50 update Cirrus Vision SF50 is a composite fully pressurized aircraft. The OEM is considered one of the pioneers of composite airframe construction. To date, Cirrus has delivered 6300 composite airframes without a single structural failure. Certification of the $1.96 million single-engine personal jet enters the home stretch with customer deliveries expected mid-year. By Stuart Lau Order book 18 to 24 months later, full produc- ATP/FE/CFII Airbus A300-600, tion will peak out at over 100 aircraft Boeing 747, 747-400, 757/767, Popularity of the Cirrus SR20 and per year. CRJ and Saab 340 SR22 series continues as the Vision Jet nears certiication. For the past 2 irrus Aircraft is entering the years, Cirrus has delivered over 300 An integrated digital aircraft inal stages of certiication for new aircraft annually maintaining its Cirrus Perspective Touch by Garmin Cthe world’s irst single-engine leading-in-deliveries position. In all, was introduced in late 2015 as the personal jet: The Cirrus Vision SF50. Cirrus has delivered over 6300 high new avionics system designed spe- Targeting mid-2016 for certiication performance single-engine piston ciically for the Vision SF50. Based and entry into service, this $1.96 aircraft. Many of these current Cir- on the Garmin 3000 avionics suite, million aircraft will establish a new rus customers have placed deposits the Perspective Touch system fea- category positioned neatly between for the new Vision SF50. To date, the tures the latest turbine-class touch- the single-engine turboprop and company has chalked up nearly 600 screen-based lightdeck.
    [Show full text]
  • My Other Plane Goes Subsonex! Flying the Other Single-Engine, V-Tail, Parachute-Equipped Jet
    My Other Plane Goes SubSonex! Flying the other Single-Engine, V-Tail, Parachute-Equipped Jet ... The JSX-2 SubSonex by MATTHEW MCDANIEL The author poses with the SubSonex after completing his Author’s Note: This is a slight departure from the previous permanent LOA checkride at the Moriarty, New Mexico airport (0E0). installments of the “My Other Plane” series often featured here. This installment does not involve the ownership of designed with piston-power in mind. The jet engines multiple aircraft by a specific COPA member. Nonetheless, they utilized were mostly converted Auxiliary Power Units it’s in the spirit of that series in which I discuss this (APUs) or up-scaled RC/model aircraft engines. While the fascinating aircraft, my experience flying it, and why/how former suffered from poor power-to-weight ratios and a typical COPA-member/Cirrus-pilot might find it a great high fuel consumption, the latter lacked reliability and choice for their future “other plane.” operational convenience. he altimeter reads 9,500 feet MSL, but I’m only at Then, in 2008, a Czech company with decades of 3,000 or so feet above New Mexico’s high desert experience building military-grade APUs, introduced terrain. If I crank my head over my shoulders, I can something different, something game-changing. The T PBS TJ-100 turbojet engine was a modern, clean- see all the way around to the tips of the ruddervators. Yet, I’m still required to do clearing turns before beginning my sheet design with exceptional thrust-to-weight ratio maneuver series, so I do.
    [Show full text]
  • US and Russian Human Space Flights
    Aeronautics and Space Report of the President Fiscal Year 1888 Washington, D.C. 20546 .- vi a, The National Aeronautics and Space Act of L CL aJ L 1958 directed the annual Aeronautics and L u- Space Report to include a “comprehensive i L 0 Q description of the programmed activities and the a, b! a, U accomplishments of all agencies of the United m a v, States in the field of aeronautics and space 13 C m activities during the preceding calendar year. ” VI U .- I 3 In recent years, the reports have been prepared m K 0 L on a fiscal year basis, consistent with the a, budp < etary period now used in programs of the Federal Government. This year’s report covers activities that took place from October 1 , 1998, through September 30, 1999. i TABLEOF CONTENTS National Aeronautics and Space Administration ........1 Department of Defense ......................... 17 Federal Aviation Administration ................... 19 Department of Commerce ....................... 27 Department of the Interior ...................... 39 Federal Communications Commission .............. 47 Department of Agriculture ....................... 49 National Science Foundation ..................... 59 Department of State ........................... 63 Department of Energy .......................... 65 Smithsonian Institution ......................... 67 Appendices .................................. 71 A-1 U.S. Government Spacecraft Record ............................... 72 A-2 World Record of Space Launches Successful in Attaining Earth Orbit or Beyond ................................... 73 B Successful Launches to Orbit on U.S. Launch Vehicles, October 1, 1998-September 30, 1999 .............................. 74 C U.S. and Russian Human Space Flights, 1961-September 30, 1999 ..................................... .79 D U.S. Space Launch Vehicles .................................... .97 E-1 A Space Activities of the U .S. c.overr!men?-Hist~rica! Eudget Summary- Budget Authority (in millions of real-year dollars) ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Original Vision of the Vision
    columns | diary Dale Klapmeier is co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of CIrrus Aircraft in Duluth, MN THE PERSONAL JET IS BORN #1 The original vision of the Vision Running up to the first Cirrus SF50 jet delivery in less than one year, our new monthly diary will have members of the development team giving insights on how the only Personal Jet remaining in the market is created Cirrus, we know there is a way to avoid that From the interior shape and materials TEXT Dale Klapmeier compromise as we have engineered the used, to large windows throughout, to the Vision SF50 to be simple, safe and even fun placement of little details in the seats and assion for flying and aviation has to fly. the cabin door, the Vision SF50 Personal driven Cirrus Aircraft since our first Features such as pressurization, de- Jet sets a new bar in comfort for everyone Pideas about new airplanes more ice system and even the interior climate in the aircraft. And of course the Vision than 30 years ago. Then, as now, we wanted controls are all designed to be as simple as SF50 is equipped with a Cirrus Airframe not just to build »a new airplane«, but also possible. All major systems are integrated Parachute System (CAPS), which has pro- to reimagine what an airplane was suppo- in the Cirrus Perspective G3000-based ven itself as a life-saver many times. sed to be as seen through the eyes of the flight deck giving the pilot quick and easy We have been dreaming of this new air- owner and pilot.
    [Show full text]
  • Airports and the Newest Generation of General Aviation Aircraft
    AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 17 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Airports and the Newest Generation of General Aviation Aircraft Volume 2: Guidebook ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2009 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS James Wilding CHAIR: Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Independent Consultant VICE CHAIR: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington VICE CHAIR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board Jeff Hamiel Minneapolis–St. Paul MEMBERS Metropolitan Airports Commission J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY MEMBERS Allen D. Biehler, Secretary, Pennsylvania DOT, Harrisburg James Crites Larry L. Brown, Sr., Executive Director, Mississippi DOT, Jackson Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Richard de Neufville Norfolk, VA Massachusetts Institute of Technology William A.V. Clark, Professor, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles Kevin C. Dolliole David S. Ekern, Commissioner, Virginia DOT, Richmond Unison Consulting John K. Duval Nicholas J. Garber, Henry L. Kinnier Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Beverly Municipal Airport Virginia, Charlottesville Kitty Freidheim Jeffrey W. Hamiel, Executive Director, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Minneapolis, MN Freidheim Consulting Edward A. (Ned) Helme, President, Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC Steve Grossman Oakland International Airport Will Kempton, Director, California DOT, Sacramento Tom Jensen Susan Martinovich, Director, Nevada DOT, Carson City National Safe Skies Alliance Debra L. Miller, Secretary, Kansas DOT, Topeka Catherine M. Lang Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore Federal Aviation Administration Pete K.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadable App to Connect Smartphones Audio, and Lighting Supplies to the U.S
    Maximizing your investment in private air transport August/September 2016 | Vol. 14 No. 5 BUSINESS JET TRAVELER® BRUCE DICKINSON His band, Iron Maiden, plays heavy metal—and he pilots its heavy jet FALCON 900DX | POLAR BEARS | CABIN TECH BJTONLINE.COM Dassault Falcon Jet Corp. dfj c019693a Proof 1 NON-STOP LUXURY FROM LONDON TO SINGAPORE AND ANYWHERE IN BETWEEN. To step inside Dassault’s new agship is to experience the ultimate expression of comfort and cabin chic. With 30 spacious con gurations to choose from and exquisite, handcrafted nishings, no detail is overlooked. With its 6,450 nm/11,950 km range, the 8X not only ies farther than any previous Falcon, it is able to y into airports other long-range jets have to y over. Falcon 8X. Arriving in 2016. WWW.DASSAULTFALCON.COM I FRANCE: +33 1 47 11 88 68 I USA: +1 201 541 5600 Business Jet Traveler Trim: 9”x10.75” Bleed: .125” Safety: .375 INSIDE BJT AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 16 26 50 DEPARTMENTS 6 UP FRONT Some well-deserved awards. FLYING 8 MAILBOX On the Byrds’ “Eight Miles High” and 12 ON THE ROAD 40 USED AIRCRAFT REVIEW a GIV crash. Business jets typically have good-looking cabins, The Falcon 900DX is a great airplane backed with but the most memorable sights are often excellent product support, and the price is right. 10 ON THE FLY through the window. Incredible timepieces, Kentucky’s bourbon 46 PREOWNED trail, and a major new Washington museum. 16 INSIDE FRACTIONALS The best—and worst—buys in business jets. Shareholders lose ground as providers restrict 14 MONEY MATTERS rights and flexibility, consultants contend.
    [Show full text]
  • Apalachicola Regional Airport Airport Master Plan Update
    APALACHICOLA REGIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE WORKING PAPER NUMBER ONE Containing: Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Inventory of Existing Conditions Chapter 3: Aviation Activity Forecasts Prepared By: 4506 Highway 20 East, Suite 250 Niceville, FL 32578 July 2019 APALACHICOLA REGIONAL AIRPORT Apalachicola, Florida Master Plan Update Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 2. Inventory of Existing Conditions ....................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Airport Setting ........................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Location ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2.2 Administration .................................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.3 Airport History .................................................................................................... 2-4 2.2.4 National Air Transportation System Role ........................................................... 2-4 2.2.5 Florida Aviation System Plan ............................................................................. 2-5 2.3 Meteorological Conditions ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cirrus Aircraft Utilizes FARO Laser Tracker for Robot Calibration
    Cirrus Aircraft Utilizes FARO Laser Tracker for Robot Calibration How Cirrus Aircraft uses Laser Tracker Technology to validate the setup of the robot to ensure its true position accuracy, reduce the quantity and complexity of required fixtures, and cut tooling costs by 60%. Aerospace / Machine Tool & Robot Calibration “Though the robot calibration is a unique application, Cirrus has also utilized the Tracker with other large scale needs such as assembly and bond fixture setup, component inspections, and even entire aircraft inspections. The FARO Laser Tracker has and will continue to be a valuable tool in Cirrus Aircraft’s arsenal of success, both now and into the future.” With more than 25 years of dedication, the name Cirrus is associated with performance, safety, comfort, and innovation. Since 1984, Cirrus Aircraft (www.cirrusaircraft.com) has been committed to the future of aviation through its focus on safety, innovation, and improving the overall flying experience. Cirrus produces the world’s top two best-selling piston-engine general aviation aircraft, the Cirrus SR 22 and SR22T, with an unmatched integrity in design, quality, and engineering. Using an analytical approach, Cirrus embraces industry best-practices when it comes to analysis and modeling. Using this methodology, they are able to understand the structural characteristics of materials and components and then build a computer model. This process begins by predicting the characteristics of composite structures, using analysis, and then validating the collected data with the computer models. This process is an expensive one – but demonstrates Cirrus’ commitment to quality and safety. This analytic approach continues with the development of the Cirrus Vision SF50, a single-engine, low-wing, Personal Jet.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition Light Business Jet Family Design
    2017 Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition Light Business Jet Family Design 2016 – 2017 AIAA Design Competition Proposal Light Business Jet Family Design Georgia Institute of Technology Team Members AIAA Numbers Signature Daniel Wise 808961 Avery Leonard 808867 Katie Zhang 511449 David Twibell 480373 Michelle Ku 808919 Pamir Sevincel 819687 Thomas Rainey 593555 Advisors: Dr. Neil Weston Carl Johnson 1. Table of Contents 1. Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................... i 2. List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... iii 3. List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... v 4. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 5. Proposal Requirement .............................................................................................................. 2 6. Market Research ...................................................................................................................... 2 7. Conceptual Design ................................................................................................................... 5 Configuration Selection ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]