Amphiporus Imparispinosus Class: Enopla Order: Hoplonemertea, Monostylitera Family: Amphiporidae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amphiporus Imparispinosus Class: Enopla Order: Hoplonemertea, Monostylitera Family: Amphiporidae Phylum: Nemertea Amphiporus imparispinosus Class: Enopla Order: Hoplonemertea, Monostylitera Family: Amphiporidae Taxonomy: Overlapping species ranges and the proximal end of the basal segment is suggested synonymy exists between A. rounded and wide (Fig. 3). Three accessory imparispinosus and A. similis (=A. stylet pouches are present, each containing imparispinosus var. similis) and A. leuciodus two or more reserve stylets (Griffin 1898; (Coe 1901, 1905). For this reason, A. Corrêa 1964; Stricker and Cloney 1982). (The imparispinosus is indicated as species proboscis must be everted or the worm inquirenda (identity requires further dissected to see the stylet and pouches.) investigation) (Gibson and Crandall 1989; Tube/Burrow: Amphiporus imparispinosus Gibson 1995). does not inhabit a tube. Description Possible Misidentifications Size: Individuals are 25–50 mm in length and The locally represented (central CA very slender (Coe 1905). to OR, Roe et al. 2007) hoplonemerteans Color: Solid, opaque-white and sometimes (the free-living Enopla), with a central pale reddish with yellowish tinge. Also pale proboscis stylet (suborder Monostilifera), yellow or flesh-colored. The brain area is pink can be divided into ten families (Chernyshev and intestinal canal brownish (Coe 1905). 2005). 1) The Ototyphlonemertidae have General Morphology: Soft, elongate and not no ocelli as adults and possess statocysts; segmented (phylum Nemertea). 2) the Emplectonometatidae have a short Body: Long and slender, especially for the proboscis, usually numerous ocelli (four or family Amphiporidae, and slightly flattened more); 3) the Prosorhochmidae have a very posteriorly (Fig. 1). long, slender proboscis, usually two pairs of Anterior: Head not strongly large ocelli and a distinctive smile-like fold differentiated from rest of body (Fig. on the head (the “smiling worms”, 2). Maslakova and Norenburg 2008); 4) The Posterior: Tapers to a blunt end. No Tetrastemmatidae usually have four ocelli caudal cirrus (Fig. 1). and are small or medium-sized nemerteans; Eyes/Eyespots: Many, small eyes present in 5) The Carcinonemertidae are small two groups on each side of the head and are nemerteans with 0–2 eyes and are parasitic positioned anterior to brain. The first is an on decapod crustaceans; 6) Neesidae (e.g. elongated group of 6–15 ocelli found along Paranemertes) and 7) Zygonemertidae are the anterior margin. The second, a posterior medium to large nemerteans with numerous group of about the same number, (but it can eyes; 8) Malacobdellidae include local be up to 30) which is internal to the first species which are commensal within the group. Fewer eyes are present in younger mantle cavity of bivalves; 9) Oerstediidae, animals (Fig. 2). consisting of a single local species, are Mouth: Anterior to brain opens into proboscis small with four eyes that can be doubled pore (class Enopla) (Corrêa 1964). (Chernyshev 2005); 10) the Amphiporidae Proboscis: Very long and contained within a have many eyes and are relatively short and muscular sheath (rhynchocoel) which is broad although A. imparispinosus is unusual almost as long as the total body length (genus in this respect (Coe 1940). Amphiporus). The proboscis is armed with a There are at least eight species of single stylet (suborder Monostilifera), in which Amphiporus reported in the Pacific Hiebert, T.C. 2015. Amphiporus imparispinosus. In: Oregon Estuarine Invertebrates: Rudys' Illustrated Guide to Common Species, 3rd ed. T.C. Hiebert, B.A. Butler and A.L. Shanks (eds.). University of Oregon Libraries and Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, Charleston, OR. A publication of the University of Oregon Libraries and the Oregon Institute of Marine Biology Individual species: http://hdl.handle.net/1794/12646 and full 3rd edition: http://hdl.handle.net/1794/18839 Email corrections to: [email protected] Northwest, but there are likely more (Roe et exist in very exposed and surf-swept shores al. 2007). Amphiporus formidabilis is the (Coe 1940). only other slender species that resembles Salinity: Found on the open coast, at A. imparispinosus superficially, and can be salinities of 30. differentiable by 6–12 pouches of accessory Temperature: Latitudinal range would stylets, where A. imparispinosus has 2–3. It indicate a wide temperature tolerance, for is also much larger than A. imparispinosus, example 10–20° C (San Pedro, CA.) to just 10–30 cm in length (Haderlie 1975). above freezing (Bering Strait, AK). Theother species are rather stout and more Tidal Level: Intertidal and below to 50 m strongly colored. Amphiporus rubellus is a (Corrêa 1964). uniform red or orange with no pattern and Associates: 10–20 ocelli on each side of its head. Abundance: One of the most common local Amphiporus punctulatus is dark brown, Amphiporus species (Haderlie 1980). irregularly blotched on its dorsal surface, and with a lighter head marked with two Life-History Information dark spots. Amphiporus bimaculatus Reproduction: The development of A. (=Nipponnemertes bimaculatus) gets its imparispinosus is not known. However, name from the same sort of strong spots individuals are likely dioecious (separate (which are not ocelli) on its light-colored sexes) (Coe 1905) and some head. Its general coloration is hoplonemerteans are hermaphroditic, with homogenous, not blotchy as in A. eggs and sperm released at same time. Ripe punctulatus. Amphipours bimaculatus specimens of the congener, A. formidabilis, secretes great quantities of mucus when have been observed in winter and spring disturbed (Haderlie 1980) and is known to months (Washington, Stricker 1987) where readily evert its proboscis. A variety of A. oocytes were 250–350 µm in diameter imparispinosus (A. i. similis, Coe, 1905) surrounded by thick (up to 100 µm thick) egg varies only by having two pouches of jelly. Embryos cleave after six hours, develop accessory stylets not three (Coe 1940). into morulae at 20 hours and are ciliated and Because of the many swimming at 42 hours (9˚ C, Stricker 1987) identifying characteristics which are Larva: Planuliform and lecithotrophic A. internal and not visible, it is sometimes formbidabilis larvae have an apical tuft and very difficult to distinguish among swim for one day before settlement (9˚ C, nemerteans without dissecting them. Stricker 1987). Ways in which the worms flatten, Juvenile: contract, and coil are useful as aids to Longevity: identification of live specimens. Growth Rate: Food: Predatory, killing prey with an armed Ecological Information proboscis that secretes toxins (Bacq 1936) Range: Originally described from specimens and kills prey before ingestion (Jennings and collected in Puget Sound, Washington and Gibson 1969). Alaska (Griffin 1898). Known northeastern Predators: Pacific range from Siberia, Bering Sea and Behavior: Does not swim or roll up spirally south to Ensenada, Mexico. Amphiporus is (genus Amphiporus) (Coe 1905). particularly rare in the tropics (Coe 1940). Local Distribution: Coos Bay distribution at Bibliography several mudflats along the South Slough and also open coast sites at Cape Arago. 1. BACQ, Z. M. 1936. Le poisons des Habitat: Among algae (e.g. red alga, nemertiens. Bulletin of the Academie Corallina vancouveriensis) shells, mussels Royale de Belgique. Classe des and other growths on rocks. Individuals can Sciences. 5:1072-1079. Hiebert, T.C. 2015. Amphiporus imparispinosus. In: Oregon Estuarine Invertebrates: Rudys' Illustrated Guide to Common Species, 3rd ed. T.C. Hiebert, B.A. Butler and A.L. Shanks (eds.). University of Oregon Libraries and Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, Charleston, OR. 2. CHERNYSHEV, A. V. 2005. System of 12. JENNINGS, J. B., and R. GIBSON. families of enoplan nemerteans of the 1969. Observations on the nutrition of order Eumonostilifera (Nemertea: seven species of Rhynchocoelan Enopla). Russian Journal of Marine worms. Biological Bulletin. 136:405- Biology. 31:S27-S33. 433. 3. COE, W. R. 1901. Papers from the 13. MASLAKOVA, S. A., and J. L. Harriman Alaska Expedition. The NORENBURG. 2008. Revision of the Nemerteans. Proceedings of the smiling worms, genus Prosorhochmus Washington Academy: 1-110. Keferstein, 1862, and description of a 4. —. 1905. Nemerteans of the west and new species, Prosorhochmus northwest coasts of North America. belizeanus sp. nov.(Prosorhochmidae, Bulletin of the Museum at Harvard Hoplonemertea, Nemertea) from College. xlvii:1-318. Florida and Belize. Journal of Natural 5. —. 1940. Revision of the nemertean History. 42:1219-1260. fauna of the Pacific coasts of north, 14. ROE, P., J. L. NORENBURG, and S. central and northern South America. MASLAKOVA. 2007. Nemertea, p. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions. 221-233. In: Light and Smith manual: Reports. 2:247-323. intertidal invertebrates from Central 6. CORRÊA, D. D. 1964. Nemerteans California to Oregon. J. T. Carlton from California and Oregon. (ed.). University of California Press, Proceedings of the California Berkeley, CA. Academy of Sciences (series 4). 15. STRICKER, S. A. 1987. Phylum 31:515-558. Nemertea, p. 129-137. In: 7. GIBSON, R. 1995. Nemertean genera Reproduction and development of and species of the world: an annotated marine invertebrates of the northern checklist of original names and Pacific coast. University of description citation, synonyms, current Washington Press, Seattle, WA. taxonomic status, habitats and 16. STRICKER, S. A., and R. A. CLONEY. recorded zoogeographic distribution. 1982. Stylet formation in nemerteans. Journal of Natural History. 29:271-562. The Biological Bulletin.
Recommended publications
  • Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary
    July 15, 2013 Final Report Project SR12-002: Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary Gary L. Taghon, Rutgers University, Project Manager [email protected] Judith P. Grassle, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Charlotte M. Fuller, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Rosemarie F. Petrecca, Rutgers University, Co-Manager and Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Patricia Ramey, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Frankfurt Germany, Co-Manager [email protected] Thomas Belton, NJDEP Project Manager and NJDEP Research Coordinator [email protected] Marc Ferko, NJDEP Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Bob Schuster, NJDEP Bureau of Marine Water Monitoring [email protected] Introduction The Barnegat Bay ecosystem is potentially under stress from human impacts, which have increased over the past several decades. Benthic macroinvertebrates are commonly included in studies to monitor the effects of human and natural stresses on marine and estuarine ecosystems. There are several reasons for this. Macroinvertebrates (here defined as animals retained on a 0.5-mm mesh sieve) are abundant in most coastal and estuarine sediments, typically on the order of 103 to 104 per meter squared. Benthic communities are typically composed of many taxa from different phyla, and quantitative measures of community diversity (e.g., Rosenberg et al. 2004) and the relative abundance of animals with different feeding behaviors (e.g., Weisberg et al. 1997, Pelletier et al. 2010), can be used to evaluate ecosystem health. Because most benthic invertebrates are sedentary as adults, they function as integrators, over periods of months to years, of the properties of their environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and "Aschelminthes" - A
    BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol. III - Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and "Aschelminthes" - A. Schmidt-Rhaesa PLATYHELMINTHES, NEMERTEA, AND “ASCHELMINTHES” A. Schmidt-Rhaesa University of Bielefeld, Germany Keywords: Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, Gnathifera, Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, Rotifera, Acanthocephala, Cycliophora, Nemathelminthes, Gastrotricha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera Contents 1. Introduction 2. General Morphology 3. Platyhelminthes, the Flatworms 4. Nemertea (Nemertini), the Ribbon Worms 5. “Aschelminthes” 5.1. Gnathifera 5.1.1. Gnathostomulida 5.1.2. Micrognathozoa (Limnognathia maerski) 5.1.3. Rotifera 5.1.4. Acanthocephala 5.1.5. Cycliophora (Symbion pandora) 5.2. Nemathelminthes 5.2.1. Gastrotricha 5.2.2. Nematoda, the Roundworms 5.2.3. Nematomorpha, the Horsehair Worms 5.2.4. Priapulida 5.2.5. Kinorhyncha 5.2.6. Loricifera Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary UNESCO – EOLSS This chapter provides information on several basal bilaterian groups: flatworms, nemerteans, Gnathifera,SAMPLE and Nemathelminthes. CHAPTERS These include species-rich taxa such as Nematoda and Platyhelminthes, and as taxa with few or even only one species, such as Micrognathozoa (Limnognathia maerski) and Cycliophora (Symbion pandora). All Acanthocephala and subgroups of Platyhelminthes and Nematoda, are parasites that often exhibit complex life cycles. Most of the taxa described are marine, but some have also invaded freshwater or the terrestrial environment. “Aschelminthes” are not a natural group, instead, two taxa have been recognized that were earlier summarized under this name. Gnathifera include taxa with a conspicuous jaw apparatus such as Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, and Rotifera. Although they do not possess a jaw apparatus, Acanthocephala also belong to Gnathifera due to their epidermal structure. ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Macroinvertebrate Communities and Habitat Characteristics in the Northern and Southern Colorado Plateau Networks Pilot Protocol Implementation
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Macroinvertebrate Communities and Habitat Characteristics in the Northern and Southern Colorado Plateau Networks Pilot Protocol Implementation Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2010/320 ON THE COVER Clockwise from bottom left: Coyote Gulch, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (USGS/Anne Brasher); Intermittent stream (USGS/Anne Brasher); Coyote Gulch, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (USGS/Anne Brasher); Caddisfl y larvae of the genus Neophylax (USGS/Steve Fend); Adult damselfi les (USGS/Terry Short). Macroinvertebrate Communities and Habitat Characteristics in the Northern and Southern Colorado Plateau Networks Pilot Protocol Implementation Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2010/320 Authors Anne M. D. Brasher Christine M. Albano Rebecca N. Close Quinn H. Cannon Matthew P. Miller U.S. Geological Survey Utah Water Science Center 121 West 200 South Moab, Utah 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network National Park Service P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 May 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that ad- dress natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Ser- vice and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Bathyal Nemertean, Proamphiporus Kaimeiae Sp
    Species Diversity 25: 183–188 Published online 8 August 2020 DOI: 10.12782/specdiv.25.183 A New Species of Bathyal Nemertean, Proamphiporus kaimeiae sp. nov., off Tohoku, Japan, and Molecular Systematics of the Genus (Nemertea: Monostilifera) Natsumi Hookabe1,2,5, Shinji Tsuchida3, Yoshihiro Fujiwara3, and Hiroshi Kajihara4 1 Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan E-mail: [email protected] 2 Present address: Misaki Marine Biological Station, School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Miura, Kanagawa 238-0225, Japan E-mail: [email protected] 3 Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 237-0061, Japan 4 Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan 5 Corresponding author (Received 21 October 2019; Accepted 15 April 2020) http://zoobank.org/71D0D145-2CE7-4592-BD82-C67EAA0A41E5 The monostiliferous hoplonemertean Proamphiporus kaimeiae sp. nov. is described based on a single specimen collect- ed from the bottom of the Northwest Pacific, 262 m deep, off Tohoku in Japan, by use of a remotely operated vehicle during a cruise organized by Tohoku Ecosystem-Associated Marine Sciences (TEAMS) research project in 2019. The position of the cerebral organs in the new species, being posterior to the proboscis insertion, is unusual for Eumonostilifera, which is one of the diagnostic traits of the so-far monospecific Proamphiporus Chernyshev and Polyakova, 2019, and Amphiporus rectangulus Strand, Herrera-Bachiller, Nygren, and Kånneby, 2014. The latter is herein transferred to Proamphiporus to yield a new combination, Proamphiporus rectangulus comb. nov., based on the reported internal morphology. Molecular phylo- genetic analyses based on 16S rRNA, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA, and histone H3 genes placed P.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019
    NYSDEC SOP #208-19 Title: Stream Biomonitoring Rev: 1.2 Date: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 188 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State March 2019 Note: Division of Water (DOW) SOP revisions from year 2016 forward will only capture the current year parties involved with drafting/revising/approving the SOP on the cover page. The dated signatures of those parties will be captured here as well. The historical log of all SOP updates and revisions (past & present) will immediately follow the cover page. NYSDEC SOP 208-19 Stream Biomonitoring Rev. 1.2 Date: 03/29/2019 Page 3 of 188 SOP #208 Update Log 1 Prepared/ Revision Revised by Approved by Number Date Summary of Changes DOW Staff Rose Ann Garry 7/25/2007 Alexander J. Smith Rose Ann Garry 11/25/2009 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 1.0 3/29/2012 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 2.0 4/18/2014 • Definition of a reference site clarified (Sect. 8.2.3) • WAVE results added as a factor Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 3.0 4/1/2016 in site selection (Sect. 8.2.2 & 8.2.6) • HMA details added (Sect. 8.10) • Nonsubstantive changes 2 • Disinfection procedures (Sect. 8) • Headwater (Sect. 9.4.1 & 10.2.7) assessment methods added • Benthic multiplate method added (Sect, 9.4.3) Brian Duffy Rose Ann Garry 1.0 5/01/2018 • Lake (Sect. 9.4.5 & Sect. 10.) assessment methods added • Detail on biological impairment sampling (Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Nemertean Taxonomy—Implementing Changes in the Higher Ranks, Dismissing Anopla and Enopla
    Received: 27 August 2018 | Accepted: 28 August 2018 DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12317 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Nemertean taxonomy—Implementing changes in the higher ranks, dismissing Anopla and Enopla Dear Editor, José E. Alfaya3 Nemertean classification has closely followed Stiasny‐ Fernando Ángel Fernández‐Álvarez4 Wijnhoff’s scheme (1936) that was based on Schultze’s Håkan S Andersson5 (1851) division of the taxon into the two classes Anopla and Sonia C. S. Andrade6 Enopla. In August 2018, the 9th International Conference of Thomas Bartolomaeus7 Nemertean Biology took place in the Wadden Sea Station of Patrick Beckers7 the Alfred Wegener Institute in List auf Sylt, Germany. At Gregorio Bigatti3 this meeting, the community reached consensus to revise ne- Irina Cherneva8 mertean taxonomy at the class level, based on the compiled Alexey Chernyshev9,10 evidence from studies on nemertean systematics published Brian M. Chung11 in the last 15 years (Andrade et al., 2014, 2012 ; Thollesson Jörn von Döhren7 & Norenburg, 2003). Previous classifications (e.g., Stiasny‐ Gonzalo Giribet12 Wijnhoff, 1936) are not based on phylogenetic grounds, and Jaime Gonzalez‐Cueto13 the use of these names is therefore nowadays not wholly in- Alfonso Herrera‐Bachiller14 formative. With the purpose of facilitating the practical use Terra Hiebert15 of the nemertean taxonomy and also making nemertean tax- Natsumi Hookabe16 onomy reflect a wealth of more recent information, we con- Juan Junoy14 clude that the ranks Anopla and Enopla should be eliminated Hiroshi Kajihara16 with the following argumentation: “Enopla” has for long Daria Krämer7 held no more information than the name “Hoplonemertea”. Sebastian Kvist17,18 “Anopla” is paraphyletic and the name usually corresponds Timur Yu Magarlamov9 to the following traits: (a) not bearing stylet; and (b) mouth Svetlana Maslakova15 and proboscis having separate openings.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum Nemertea)
    THE BIOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS OF A NEW SPECIES OF RIBBON WORM, GENUS TUBULANUS (PHYLUM NEMERTEA) By Rebecca Kirk Ritger Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science In Biology Chair: Dr. Qiristopher'Tudge m Dr.David C r. Jon L. Norenburg Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences JuK4£ __________ Date 2004 American University Washington, D.C. 20016 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 1 1 0 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1421360 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ® UMI UMI Microform 1421360 Copyright 2004 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE BIOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS OF A NEW SPECIES OF RIBBON WORM, GENUS TUBULANUS (PHYLUM NEMERTEA) By Rebecca Kirk Ritger ABSTRACT Most nemerteans are studied from poorly preserved museum specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ovicides Paralithodis (Nemertea, Carcinonemertidae), a New Species
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 258: 1–15 (2013)Ovicides paralithodis (Nemertea, Carcinonemertidae), a new species... 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.258.4260 RESEARCH artICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Ovicides paralithodis (Nemertea, Carcinonemertidae), a new species of symbiotic egg predator of the red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus (Tilesius, 1815) (Decapoda, Anomura) Hiroshi Kajihara1,†, Armand M. Kuris2,‡ 1 Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan 2 Marine Science Institute & Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9610, USA † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:D43FC916-850B-4F35-A78C-C2116447C606 ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:DEF44B3D-F5AF-47DC-8F4A-CF4EB3F54D4C Corresponding author: Hiroshi Kajihara ([email protected]) Academic editor: Jon Norenburg | Received 7 November 2012 | Accepted 7 January 2013 | Published 14 January 2013 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B0271AE6-3E1D-4C76-81FD-54242FAE4A5D Citation: Kajihara H, Kuris AM (2013) Ovicides paralithodis (Nemertea, Carcinonemertidae), a new species of symbiotic egg predator of the red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus (Tilesius, 1815) (Decapoda, Anomura). ZooKeys 258: 1–15. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.258.4260 Abstract Ovicides paralithodis sp. n. is described from the egg mass of the red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus (Tilesius, 1815) from the Sea of Okhotsk, off Hokkaido, Japan, and Alaska, USA. Among four congeners, O. paralithodis can be distinguished from O. julieae Shields, 2001 and O. davidi Shields and Segonzac, 2007 by having no eyes; from O. jonesi Shields and Segonzac, 2007 by the presence of basophilic, vacu- olated glandular lobes in the precerebral region; and from O.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxygen, Ecology, and the Cambrian Radiation of Animals
    Oxygen, Ecology, and the Cambrian Radiation of Animals The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Sperling, Erik A., Christina A. Frieder, Akkur V. Raman, Peter R. Girguis, Lisa A. Levin, and Andrew H. Knoll. 2013. Oxygen, Ecology, and the Cambrian Radiation of Animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. 33: 13446–13451. Published Version doi:10.1073/pnas.1312778110 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12336338 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Oxygen, ecology, and the Cambrian radiation of animals Erik A. Sperlinga,1, Christina A. Friederb, Akkur V. Ramanc, Peter R. Girguisd, Lisa A. Levinb, a,d, 2 Andrew H. Knoll Affiliations: a Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138 b Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093- 0218 c Marine Biological Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Andhra University, Waltair, Visakhapatnam – 530003 d Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138 1 Correspondence to: [email protected] 2 Correspondence to: [email protected] PHYSICAL SCIENCES: Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES: Evolution Abstract: 154 words Main Text: 2,746 words Number of Figures: 2 Number of Tables: 1 Running Title: Oxygen, ecology, and the Cambrian radiation Keywords: oxygen, ecology, predation, Cambrian radiation The Proterozoic-Cambrian transition records the appearance of essentially all animal body plans (phyla), yet to date no single hypothesis adequately explains both the timing of the event and the evident increase in diversity and disparity.
    [Show full text]
  • Larval Biology and Estuarine Ecology of the Nemertean Egg
    LARVAL BIOLOGY AND ESTUARINE ECOLOGY OF THE NEMERTEAN EGG PREDATOR CARCINONEMERTES ERRANS ON THE DUNGENESS CRAB, CANCER MAGISTER by PAUL HAYVEN DUNN A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Biology and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2011 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Paul Hayven Dunn Title: Larval Biology and Estuarine Ecology of the Nemertean Egg Predator Carcinonemertes errans on the Dungeness Crab, Cancer magister This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Biology by: Brendan Bohannan Chairperson Craig Young Advisor Svetlana Maslakova Member Alan Shanks Member William Orr Outside Member and Kimberly Andrews Espy Vice President for Research & Innovation/Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded September 2011 ii © 2011 Paul Hayven Dunn iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Paul Hayven Dunn Doctor of Philosophy Department of Biology September 2011 Title: Larval Biology and Estuarine Ecology of the Nemertean Egg Predator Carcinonemertes errans on the Dungeness Crab, Cancer magister Approved: _______________________________________________ Craig M. Young The nemertean worm Carcinonemertes errans is an egg predator on the Dungeness crab, Cancer magister, an important fishery species along the west coast of North America. This study examined the estuarine distribution and larval biology of C. errans. Parasite prevalence and mean intensity of C. errans infecting C. magister varied along an estuarine gradient in the Coos Bay, Oregon. Crabs nearest the ocean carried the heaviest parasite loads, and larger crabs were more heavily infected with worms.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity from Caves and Other Subterranean Habitats of Georgia, USA
    Kirk S. Zigler, Matthew L. Niemiller, Charles D.R. Stephen, Breanne N. Ayala, Marc A. Milne, Nicholas S. Gladstone, Annette S. Engel, John B. Jensen, Carlos D. Camp, James C. Ozier, and Alan Cressler. Biodiversity from caves and other subterranean habitats of Georgia, USA. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. 82, no. 2, p. 125-167. DOI:10.4311/2019LSC0125 BIODIVERSITY FROM CAVES AND OTHER SUBTERRANEAN HABITATS OF GEORGIA, USA Kirk S. Zigler1C, Matthew L. Niemiller2, Charles D.R. Stephen3, Breanne N. Ayala1, Marc A. Milne4, Nicholas S. Gladstone5, Annette S. Engel6, John B. Jensen7, Carlos D. Camp8, James C. Ozier9, and Alan Cressler10 Abstract We provide an annotated checklist of species recorded from caves and other subterranean habitats in the state of Georgia, USA. We report 281 species (228 invertebrates and 53 vertebrates), including 51 troglobionts (cave-obligate species), from more than 150 sites (caves, springs, and wells). Endemism is high; of the troglobionts, 17 (33 % of those known from the state) are endemic to Georgia and seven (14 %) are known from a single cave. We identified three biogeographic clusters of troglobionts. Two clusters are located in the northwestern part of the state, west of Lookout Mountain in Lookout Valley and east of Lookout Mountain in the Valley and Ridge. In addition, there is a group of tro- globionts found only in the southwestern corner of the state and associated with the Upper Floridan Aquifer. At least two dozen potentially undescribed species have been collected from caves; clarifying the taxonomic status of these organisms would improve our understanding of cave biodiversity in the state.
    [Show full text]