DOCSLIB.ORG

Phylum Nemertea)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phylum Nemertea) THE BIOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS OF A NEW SPECIES OF RIBBON WORM, GENUS TUBULANUS (PHYLUM NEMERTEA) By Rebecca Kirk Ritger Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science In Biology Chair: Dr. Qiristopher'Tudge m Dr.David C r. Jon L. Norenburg Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences JuK4£ __________ Date 2004 American University Washington, D.C. 20016 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 1 1 0 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1421360 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ® UMI UMI Microform 1421360 Copyright 2004 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE BIOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS OF A NEW SPECIES OF RIBBON WORM, GENUS TUBULANUS (PHYLUM NEMERTEA) By Rebecca Kirk Ritger ABSTRACT Most nemerteans are studied from poorly preserved museum specimens. Much of the existing data on this group of worms is incomplete at best. Only through thorough species descriptions from live animals and properly preserved specimens will we be able to reconstruct the life history relationships of this cryptic group of worms. Since nemerteans generally have very few distinctive external characters, the primary source of data used for species descriptions and phylogenetic reconstruction comes from internal morphology based on histological slide material. The goal of this project is the preparation of properly stained and sectioned material used to compare species in this particular genus. A new species of Tubulanus (Tubulanidae: Palaeonemertea: Nemertea) from southern Florida and Belize is described and illustrated. This study adds important infor­ mation about anatomy and life history and yields the most comprehensive description of a palaeonemertean. This description serves as the baseline for a preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the genus. ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................. iii LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................ vi LIST OF FIGURES..........................................................................................................vii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 1 Phylum Nemertea.................................................................................................... 1 Nemertean Taxonomy and Systematics.................................................................. 1 Palaeonemertean Systematics................................................................................. 3 Genus Tubulanus....................................................................................................3 Nemertean Anatomy and Development.................................................................. 5 Purpose of Study.....................................................................................................7 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................................................... 9 Specimen Collection................................................................................ 9 Histology............................................................................................................. 10 Pre-fixation treatment........................................................................................10 Fixation..............................................................................................................11 Washing ................................................................................................ 12 Dehydrating ............. 13 iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Clearing............................................................................................................. 13 Infiltrating with paraffin...................................................................................13 Sectioning.........................................................................................................14 Staining.............................................................................................................15 Electron Microscopy............................................................................................. 17 Light Microscopy vs. Electron Microscopy...................................................... 17 Scanning electron microscopy.......................................................................... 17 Transmission electron microscopy................ 19 3. RESULTS...........................................................................................................24 Anatomy Summary...............................................................................................24 External morphology............................................................................................24 Body wall.............................................................................................................. 25 Proboscis ...............................................................................................................26 Brain organization.................................................................................................27 Cerebral sensory organs........................................................................................ 27 Lateral sensory organs.......................................................................................... 28 Nephridial system................................................................................................. 28 A New Species of Palaeonemertean, Tubulanus riceae n. sp. (Nemertea), from South Florida and Belize............................................................... 29 Materials and Methods................................................. 29 Systematic Account .................................................................................... 29 Description.............. 31 iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Preliminary Phylogenetic Analysis of the GenusTubulanus ...........................59 4. DISCUSSION............................................................................................... 60 Tubulanus Systematics..........................................................................................60 Character Modification Justification.....................................................................65 Color.................................................................................................................65 Rhynchocoel villus............................................................................................66 Fixation artifact in anterior region....................................................................66 Head wider than body.......................................................................................66 Glandular cell types in the midgut/lateral sensory organs region.....................67 Eyes...................................................................................................................67 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH GOALS.................................... 71 Appendix A. LIST OF CHARACTERS AND THEIR STATES.............................................. 73 B. CHARACTER MATRIX FOR THE GENUS TUBULANUS ............................. 81 C. LIST OF TUBULANUS SPECIES BY LOCALITY............................................ 85 D. LIST OF TUBULANUS SPECIES DISTRIBUTION....................... 88 E. RECIPES FOR HISTOLOGICAL AND TEM PREPARATION....................... 92 REFERENCES.............. 93 v Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF TABLES Table 1. The palaeonemertean species included in the phylogenetic analysis vi Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Tubulanus riceae n. sp. Drawing of complete individual in dorsal aspect....................8 2. Tubulanus riceae n. sp. in its tube................................................................................ 44 3. Tubulanus rhabdotus....................................................................................................45 4. Tubulanus pellucidus, T. rhabdotus, and T. riceae
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary
    July 15, 2013 Final Report Project SR12-002: Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary Gary L. Taghon, Rutgers University, Project Manager [email protected] Judith P. Grassle, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Charlotte M. Fuller, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Rosemarie F. Petrecca, Rutgers University, Co-Manager and Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Patricia Ramey, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Frankfurt Germany, Co-Manager [email protected] Thomas Belton, NJDEP Project Manager and NJDEP Research Coordinator [email protected] Marc Ferko, NJDEP Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Bob Schuster, NJDEP Bureau of Marine Water Monitoring [email protected] Introduction The Barnegat Bay ecosystem is potentially under stress from human impacts, which have increased over the past several decades. Benthic macroinvertebrates are commonly included in studies to monitor the effects of human and natural stresses on marine and estuarine ecosystems. There are several reasons for this. Macroinvertebrates (here defined as animals retained on a 0.5-mm mesh sieve) are abundant in most coastal and estuarine sediments, typically on the order of 103 to 104 per meter squared. Benthic communities are typically composed of many taxa from different phyla, and quantitative measures of community diversity (e.g., Rosenberg et al. 2004) and the relative abundance of animals with different feeding behaviors (e.g., Weisberg et al. 1997, Pelletier et al. 2010), can be used to evaluate ecosystem health. Because most benthic invertebrates are sedentary as adults, they function as integrators, over periods of months to years, of the properties of their environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and "Aschelminthes" - A
    BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol. III - Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and "Aschelminthes" - A. Schmidt-Rhaesa PLATYHELMINTHES, NEMERTEA, AND “ASCHELMINTHES” A. Schmidt-Rhaesa University of Bielefeld, Germany Keywords: Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, Gnathifera, Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, Rotifera, Acanthocephala, Cycliophora, Nemathelminthes, Gastrotricha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera Contents 1. Introduction 2. General Morphology 3. Platyhelminthes, the Flatworms 4. Nemertea (Nemertini), the Ribbon Worms 5. “Aschelminthes” 5.1. Gnathifera 5.1.1. Gnathostomulida 5.1.2. Micrognathozoa (Limnognathia maerski) 5.1.3. Rotifera 5.1.4. Acanthocephala 5.1.5. Cycliophora (Symbion pandora) 5.2. Nemathelminthes 5.2.1. Gastrotricha 5.2.2. Nematoda, the Roundworms 5.2.3. Nematomorpha, the Horsehair Worms 5.2.4. Priapulida 5.2.5. Kinorhyncha 5.2.6. Loricifera Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary UNESCO – EOLSS This chapter provides information on several basal bilaterian groups: flatworms, nemerteans, Gnathifera,SAMPLE and Nemathelminthes. CHAPTERS These include species-rich taxa such as Nematoda and Platyhelminthes, and as taxa with few or even only one species, such as Micrognathozoa (Limnognathia maerski) and Cycliophora (Symbion pandora). All Acanthocephala and subgroups of Platyhelminthes and Nematoda, are parasites that often exhibit complex life cycles. Most of the taxa described are marine, but some have also invaded freshwater or the terrestrial environment. “Aschelminthes” are not a natural group, instead, two taxa have been recognized that were earlier summarized under this name. Gnathifera include taxa with a conspicuous jaw apparatus such as Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, and Rotifera. Although they do not possess a jaw apparatus, Acanthocephala also belong to Gnathifera due to their epidermal structure. ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics , Zoogeography , Andecologyofthepriapu
    SYSTEMATICS, ZOOGEOGRAPHY, AND ECOLOGY OF THE PRIAPULIDA by J. VAN DER LAND (Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden) With 89 text-figures and five plates CONTENTS Ι Introduction 4 1.1 Plan 4 1.2 Material and methods 5 1.3 Acknowledgements 6 2 Systematics 8 2.1 Historical introduction 8 2.2 Phylum Priapulida 9 2.2.1 Diagnosis 10 2.2.2 Classification 10 2.2.3 Definition of terms 12 2.2.4 Basic adaptive features 13 2.2.5 General features 13 2.2.6 Systematic notes 2 5 2.3 Key to the taxa 20 2.4 Survey of the taxa 29 Priapulidae 2 9 Priapulopsis 30 Priapulus 51 Acanthopriapulus 60 Halicryptus 02 Tubiluchidae 7° Tubiluchus 73 3 Zoogeography and ecology 84 3.1 Distribution 84 3.1.1 Faunistics 90 3.1.2 Expeditions 93 3.2 Ecology 96 3.2.1 Substratum 96 3.2.2 Depth 97 3.2.3 Temperature 97 3.24 Salinity 98 3.2.5 Oxygen 98 3.2.6 Food 99 3.2.7 Predators 100 3.2.8 Communities 102 3.3 Theoretical zoogeography 102 3.3.1 Bipolarity 102 3.3.2 Relict distribution 103 3.3.3 Concluding remarks 104 References 105 4 ZOOLOGISCHE VERHANDELINGEN 112 (1970) 1 INTRODUCTION The phylum Priapulida is only a very small group of marine worms but, since these animals apparently represent the last remnants of a once un- doubtedly much more important animal type, they are certainly of great scientific interest. Therefore, it is to be regretted that a comprehensive review of our present knowledge of the group does not exist, which does not only cause the faulty way in which the Priapulida are treated usually in textbooks and works on phylogeny, but also hampers further studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019
    NYSDEC SOP #208-19 Title: Stream Biomonitoring Rev: 1.2 Date: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 188 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State March 2019 Note: Division of Water (DOW) SOP revisions from year 2016 forward will only capture the current year parties involved with drafting/revising/approving the SOP on the cover page. The dated signatures of those parties will be captured here as well. The historical log of all SOP updates and revisions (past & present) will immediately follow the cover page. NYSDEC SOP 208-19 Stream Biomonitoring Rev. 1.2 Date: 03/29/2019 Page 3 of 188 SOP #208 Update Log 1 Prepared/ Revision Revised by Approved by Number Date Summary of Changes DOW Staff Rose Ann Garry 7/25/2007 Alexander J. Smith Rose Ann Garry 11/25/2009 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 1.0 3/29/2012 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 2.0 4/18/2014 • Definition of a reference site clarified (Sect. 8.2.3) • WAVE results added as a factor Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 3.0 4/1/2016 in site selection (Sect. 8.2.2 & 8.2.6) • HMA details added (Sect. 8.10) • Nonsubstantive changes 2 • Disinfection procedures (Sect. 8) • Headwater (Sect. 9.4.1 & 10.2.7) assessment methods added • Benthic multiplate method added (Sect, 9.4.3) Brian Duffy Rose Ann Garry 1.0 5/01/2018 • Lake (Sect. 9.4.5 & Sect. 10.) assessment methods added • Detail on biological impairment sampling (Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Nemertean Taxonomy—Implementing Changes in the Higher Ranks, Dismissing Anopla and Enopla
    Received: 27 August 2018 | Accepted: 28 August 2018 DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12317 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Nemertean taxonomy—Implementing changes in the higher ranks, dismissing Anopla and Enopla Dear Editor, José E. Alfaya3 Nemertean classification has closely followed Stiasny‐ Fernando Ángel Fernández‐Álvarez4 Wijnhoff’s scheme (1936) that was based on Schultze’s Håkan S Andersson5 (1851) division of the taxon into the two classes Anopla and Sonia C. S. Andrade6 Enopla. In August 2018, the 9th International Conference of Thomas Bartolomaeus7 Nemertean Biology took place in the Wadden Sea Station of Patrick Beckers7 the Alfred Wegener Institute in List auf Sylt, Germany. At Gregorio Bigatti3 this meeting, the community reached consensus to revise ne- Irina Cherneva8 mertean taxonomy at the class level, based on the compiled Alexey Chernyshev9,10 evidence from studies on nemertean systematics published Brian M. Chung11 in the last 15 years (Andrade et al., 2014, 2012 ; Thollesson Jörn von Döhren7 & Norenburg, 2003). Previous classifications (e.g., Stiasny‐ Gonzalo Giribet12 Wijnhoff, 1936) are not based on phylogenetic grounds, and Jaime Gonzalez‐Cueto13 the use of these names is therefore nowadays not wholly in- Alfonso Herrera‐Bachiller14 formative. With the purpose of facilitating the practical use Terra Hiebert15 of the nemertean taxonomy and also making nemertean tax- Natsumi Hookabe16 onomy reflect a wealth of more recent information, we con- Juan Junoy14 clude that the ranks Anopla and Enopla should be eliminated Hiroshi Kajihara16 with the following argumentation: “Enopla” has for long Daria Krämer7 held no more information than the name “Hoplonemertea”. Sebastian Kvist17,18 “Anopla” is paraphyletic and the name usually corresponds Timur Yu Magarlamov9 to the following traits: (a) not bearing stylet; and (b) mouth Svetlana Maslakova15 and proboscis having separate openings.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Neuroanatomy of Mollusks and Nemerteans in the Context of Deep Metazoan Phylogeny
    Comparative Neuroanatomy of Mollusks and Nemerteans in the Context of Deep Metazoan Phylogeny Von der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der RWTH Aachen University zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades einer Doktorin der Naturwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Diplom-Biologin Simone Faller aus Frankfurt am Main Berichter: Privatdozent Dr. Rudolf Loesel Universitätsprofessor Dr. Peter Bräunig Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 09. März 2012 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Hochschulbibliothek online verfügbar. Contents 1 General Introduction 1 Deep Metazoan Phylogeny 1 Neurophylogeny 2 Mollusca 5 Nemertea 6 Aim of the thesis 7 2 Neuroanatomy of Minor Mollusca 9 Introduction 9 Material and Methods 10 Results 12 Caudofoveata 12 Scutopus ventrolineatus 12 Falcidens crossotus 16 Solenogastres 16 Dorymenia sarsii 16 Polyplacophora 20 Lepidochitona cinerea 20 Acanthochitona crinita 20 Scaphopoda 22 Antalis entalis 22 Entalina quinquangularis 24 Discussion 25 Structure of the brain and nerve cords 25 Caudofoveata 25 Solenogastres 26 Polyplacophora 27 Scaphopoda 27 i CONTENTS Evolutionary considerations 28 Relationship among non-conchiferan molluscan taxa 28 Position of the Scaphopoda within Conchifera 29 Position of Mollusca within Protostomia 30 3 Neuroanatomy of Nemertea 33 Introduction 33 Material and Methods 34 Results 35 Brain 35 Cerebral organ 38 Nerve cords and peripheral nervous system 38 Discussion 38 Peripheral nervous system 40 Central nervous system 40 In search for the urbilaterian brain 42 4 General Discussion 45 Evolution of higher brain centers 46 Neuroanatomical glossary and data matrix – Essential steps toward a cladistic analysis of neuroanatomical data 49 5 Summary 53 6 Zusammenfassung 57 7 References 61 Danksagung 75 Lebenslauf 79 ii iii 1 General Introduction Deep Metazoan Phylogeny The concept of phylogeny follows directly from the theory of evolution as published by Charles Darwin in The origin of species (1859).
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Reconstruction of the Nervous and Muscular System Of
    Kerbl et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2015) 15:277 DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0531-x RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Detailed reconstruction of the nervous and muscular system of Lobatocerebridae with an evaluation of its annelid affinity Alexandra Kerbl1, Nicolas Bekkouche1, Wolfgang Sterrer2 and Katrine Worsaae1* Abstract Background: The microscopic worm group Lobatocerebridae has been regarded a ‘problematicum’, with the systematic relationship being highly debated until a recent phylogenomic study placed them within annelids (Curr Biol 25: 2000-2006, 2015). To date, a morphological comparison with other spiralian taxa lacks detailed information on the nervous and muscular system, which is here presented for Lobatocerebrum riegeri n. sp. based on immunohistochemistry and confocal laser scanning microscopy, supported by TEM and live observations. Results: The musculature is organized as a grid of longitudinal muscles and transverse muscular ring complexes in the trunk. The rostrum is supplied by longitudinal muscles and only a few transverse muscles. The intraepidermal central nervous system consists of a big, multi-lobed brain, nine major nerve bundles extending anteriorly into the rostrum and two lateral and one median cord extending posteriorly to the anus, connected by five commissures. The glandular epidermis has at least three types of mucus secreting glands and one type of adhesive unicellular glands. Conclusions: No exclusive “annelid characters” could be found in the neuromuscular system of Lobatocerebridae, except for perhaps the mid-ventral nerve. However, none of the observed structures disputes its position within this group. The neuromuscular and glandular system of L. riegeri n. sp. shows similarities to those of meiofaunal annelids such as Dinophilidae and Protodrilidae, yet likewise to Gnathostomulida and catenulid Platyhelminthes, all living in the restrictive interstitial environment among sand grains.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylum-Wide Survey Reveals Multiple Independent Gains of Head Regeneration Ability in Nemertea
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/439497; this version posted October 11, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. A phylum-wide survey reveals multiple independent gains of head regeneration ability in Nemertea Eduardo E. Zattara1,2,5, Fernando A. Fernández-Álvarez3, Terra C. Hiebert4, Alexandra E. Bely2 and Jon L. Norenburg1 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA 2 Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA 3 Institut de Ciències del Mar, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Barcelona, Spain 4 Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA 5 INIBIOMA, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Bariloche, RN, Argentina Corresponding author: E.E. Zattara, [email protected] Abstract Animals vary widely in their ability to regenerate, suggesting that regenerative abilities have a rich evolutionary history. However, our understanding of this history remains limited because regeneration ability has only been evaluated in a tiny fraction of species. Available comparative regeneration studies have identified losses of regenerative ability, yet clear documentation of gains is lacking. We surveyed regenerative ability in 34 species spanning the phylum Nemertea, assessing the ability to regenerate heads and tails either through our own experiments or from literature reports. Our sampling included representatives of the 10 most diverse families and all three orders comprising this phylum.
    [Show full text]
  • Centimeter-Wide Worm-Like Fossils from the Lowest Cambrian of South
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Centimeter-wide worm-like fossils from the lowest Cambrian of South China Received: 15 May 2017 Xingliang Zhang1, Wei Liu1, Yukio Isozaki2 & Tomohiko Sato2 Accepted: 20 October 2017 The trace fossil record implies that large worm-like animals were in place along with the skeletonizing Published: xx xx xxxx organisms during the initial stage of the Cambrian explosion. Body fossils of large worms, however, have so far not been found. Here, we describe a large, soft-bodied, worm-like organism, Vittatusivermis annularius gen. et sp. nov. from the lowest Cambrian of South China, which is constrained to the Fortunian Age (541–529 Ma) of the Cambrian Period. The elongate body of Vittatusivermis was large enough to have supported organ systems and a fuid skeleton that facilitated peristaltic locomotion, thus allowing for more complex patterns of movement than those of fatworms. Its occurrence on the same bedding surface as trace fossils suggests that Vittatusivermis might have produced epichnial trails and shallow burrows on and within sediments. Therefore, Vittatusivermis is likely to have been one of the long expected producers of trace fossils in the earliest Cambrian. Te Cambrian explosion was an evolutionary event of great magnitude, as evidenced by the abrupt appearances of diverse animal lineages in the fossil record during the early Cambrian (~541–509 Ma)1–4. Tubes, shells, and sclerites of small shelly faunas are characteristic fossils of the Terreneuvian Epoch (~541–521 Ma)5,6. Exceptionally preserved sof-bodied faunas in subsequent Cambrian Epoch 2 (~521–509 Ma) reveal a more complete faunal composition of the Cambrian explosion7,8.
    [Show full text]
  • Tubulanus Polymorphus Class: Anopla Order: Paleonemertea an Orange Ribbon Worm Family: Tubulanidae
    Phylum: Nemertea Tubulanus polymorphus Class: Anopla Order: Paleonemertea An orange ribbon worm Family: Tubulanidae “Such a worm when seen crawling in long and Palaeonemertea) but with lateral graceful curves over the bottom in clear water transverse grooves (Fig. 2a, b, c). earns for itself a place among the most Head cannot completely withdraw into body (Kozloff 1974). beautiful of all marine invertebrates” (Coe Posterior: No caudal cirrus. 1905) Eyes/Eyespots: None. Mouth: A long slit-like opening (Fig. 2c) Taxonomy: Tubulanus polymorphous was a posterior to the brain, separate from name assigned in unpublished work by proboscis pore (Fig. 2c) and positioned just Renier (1804). The genera Tubulanus and behind transverse furrows (Coe 1901). Carinella were described by Renier (1804) Proboscis: Eversible (phylum Nemertea) and Johnston (1833), respectively, and were and, when not everted, coiled inside synonymized by Bürger in 1904 (Gibson rhynchocoel (cavity). The proboscis in 1995). Melville (1986) and the International Tubulanus polymorphus is short with the Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) rhynchocoel reaching one third total worm determined that the family name Tubulanidae body length. Proboscis bears no stylets and take precedence over its senior subjective the proboscis pore almost terminal (Fig. 2c). synonym Carinellidae (Ritger and Norenburg Tube/Burrow: As is true for most Tubulanus 2006) and the name Tubulanus polymorphus species, T. polymorphus individuals live in was deemed published and available (ICZN thin parchment tubes that are attached to 1988). Previous names for T. polymorphus rocks or shells and made of hardened include C. polymorpha, C. rubra and C. mucous secretions (Coe 1943). speciosa. Possible Misidentifications Description The genus Tubulanus is slender, soft, Size: A large nemertean, up to three meters extensible without ocelli or cephalic grooves when extended.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Drumian, Miaolingian) Marjum Formation of Western Utah, USA
    First palaeoscolecid from the Cambrian (Drumian, Miaolingian) Marjum Formation of western Utah, USA WADE W. LEIBACH, RUDY LEROSEY-AUBRIL, ANNA F. WHITAKER, JAMES D. SCHIFFBAUER, and JULIEN KIMMIG Leibach, W.W., Lerosey-Aubril, R., Whitaker, A.F., Schiffbauer, J.D., and Kimmig, J. 2021. First palaeoscolecid from the Cambrian (Drumian, Miaolingian) Marjum Formation of western Utah, USA. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 66 (X): xxx–xxx. The middle Marjum Formation is one of five Miaolingian Burgess Shale-type deposits in Utah, USA. It preserves a diverse non-biomineralized fossil assemblage, which is dominated by panarthropods and sponges. Infaunal components are particularly rare, and are best exemplified by the poorly diverse scalidophoran fauna and the uncertain presence of palaeoscolecids amongst it. To date, only a single Marjum Formation fossil has been tentatively assigned to the palaeoscolecid taxon Scathascolex minor. This specimen and two recently collected worm fragments were analysed in this study using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. The previous occurrence of a Marjum Formation palaeoscolecid is refuted based on the absence of sclerites in the specimen, which we tentatively assign to an unidentified species of Ottoia. The two new fossils, however, are identified as a new palaeoscolecid taxon, Arrakiscolex aasei gen. et sp. nov., characterized by the presence of hundreds of size-constrained (20–30 µm), smooth- rimmed, discoid plates on each annulus. This is the first indisputable evidence for the presence of palaeoscolecids in the Marjum biota, and a rare occurrence of the group in the Cambrian of Laurentia. Palaeoscolecids are now known from nine Cambrian Stage 3–Guzhangian localities in Laurentia, but they typically represent rare components of the biotas.
    [Show full text]