DOCSLIB.ORG

Insekt-Nytt· 26 (3/4) 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Insekt-Nytt· 26 (3/4) 2001 Insekt-Nytt presenterer populærvitenskapelige Insekt-Nytt 26 • (3/4) 2001 oversikts- og tema-artikler om insekters (inkl. Medlemsblad for Norsk edderkoppdyr og andre landleddyr) Økologi, Entomologisk Forening systematikk, fysiologi, atferd, dyregeografi etc. Likeledes trykkes artslister fra ulike områder og Redaktør: habitater, ekskursjonsrapporter, naturvern-, Lars Ove Hansen nytte- og skadedyrstoff, bibliografier, biografier, historikk, «anekdoten>, innsamlings- og prepa­ Redaksjon: reringsteknikk, utstyrstips, bokanmeldeiser Jan Ame Stenløkk m.m. Vi trykker også alle typer stoff som er Øistein Berg relatert til Norsk Entomologisk Forening og dets Lene Martinsen lokalavdelinger: årsrapporter, regnskap, møte­ Leif Aarvik og ekskursjons-rapporter, debatt stoff etc. Nett-ansvarlig: Opprop og kontaktannonser er gratis for foreningens medlemmer. Språket er norsk Ommund Bakkevold (svensk eller dansk) gjeme med et kort engelsk Adresse: abstract for større artikler. Våre artikler refereres Insekt-Nytt, Insektavdelingen, i Zoological record. Zoologisk Museum, Insekt-Nytt vil prØve å finne sin nisje der vi ikke Universitetet i Oslo, overlapper med NEFs fagtidsskrift Norwegian Postboks 1172, Blindern, 0318 Oslo Journal of Entomology. Originale vitenskapelige Tlf.: 2285 1706 undersøkelser, nye arter for ulike faunaregioner [Besøksadresse: Sarsgt. 1,0562 Oslo] og Norge går fortsatt til dette. Derimot tar vi gjeme artikler som omhandler <<interessante og E-mail: [email protected] sjeldne funn», notater om arters habitatvalg og Sats, lay-out, paste-up: Redaksjonen levevis etc., selv om det nødvendigvis ikke er «nytt». Trykk: Nordberg Aksidenstrykkeri AS, Oslo. Annonsepriser: 1/4 side kr. 500,- Trykkdato: Mars 2002. 1/2 side kr. 800,- Opplag: 1000 1/1 side kr. 1200,- Bakside (svartIhvitt) kr. 1500,- Insekt-Nytt utkommer med 4 nummer Bakside (farger) kr. 2500,- årlig. Ved bestilling av annonser i to nummer etter hverandre kan vi tilby 10 % reduksjon, 25 % i fire påfølgende numre. Abonnement: Medlemmer av Norsk Ento­ mologisk Forening får fritt tilsendt Norwegian Mnemosynesommerfugl (Parnassius mne- Journal of Entomology og Insekt-Nytt. Kontin­ mosyne) er nå permanent fredet. Her med genten er for 2001 kr. 200,- pr. år (kr. 100,- for typisk habitat for arten fra Luster i Sogn juniormedlemmer til og med året de fyller 19 år). For medlemskap kontakt NEF, Postboks og Fjordane. Foto: Lars Ove Hansen. 386,4002 Stavanger [e-mail: [email protected]]. Insekt-Nytt 26 (3/4) 2001 Redaktøren har ordet: Om tidsskrifter og fredning av insektarter Hvor mange entomolo­ skriftene i Norge, for deretter å svinge ljåen. Nivået for fagtidsskriftet vårt var visst både giske tidsskrift behøver for lavt og for lite populært. Som vi husker lille Norge? fikk Norsk Institutt for Naturforskning (NINA) anledning til å videreføre dette, men Vi er inne i en god periode med tanke på sa dette fra seg i 1998. Etter fem år fant de ut våre tidsskrift, noe jeg tror vil virke positivt at det ble for dyrt. Jeg tror ingen i NINA på norsk entomologi framover. At det duk­ tenkte tanken at kanskje behøver vi et slikt ker opp andre nasjonale tidsskrift som tidsskrift her i Norge. Her publiseres faktisk trykker entomologisk relatert stoff, ser en stor del av grunndataene til våre rødlister. jeg derfor på som lite heldig. Ved at Fauna Som kjent havnet Serie C (Cinculus) tilbake novegica (FN) nå trykker entomologiske hos ornitologene, og vi fikk tilbake vårt som artikler, må vi entomologer forholde oss vi straks omdøpte til Norwegian Journal of til ytterligere et tidsskrift. Entomology. NINA sto så igjen med den så• Det begynner å bli endel år siden Forsk­ kalte Serie A, som skulle omfatte zoologi ningsrådet evaluerte de biologiske fagtids- minus ornitologi og entomologi. Innholdsfortegnelse Redaktøren har ordet .......................................................................................................... l Stenløkk, 1.: Revidert og utvidet fredning av norske insekter ............................................. 6 Brev fra Miljøverndepartementet ....................................................................................... 7 Greve, L.: Stilettfluer - familien Therevidae (Diptera) - hva vet vi om dem? ................... Il Lindmark, L.: Formicariet ................................................................................................. 17 Nye billetidsskrift ............................................................................................................. 20 Billekongresser ........ '" ................................................................................................. 21, 22 Aarvik, L., Berggren, K. & Bakke, S.A.: Nye funn av sommerfugler i Norge 2 ............... 23 Bokanmeldeiser / kommentarer .......... '" ............................................................................ 37 Stenløkk, 1.: Insekter i nettet ............................................................................................ 38 Oppslagstavla ................................................................................................................... 40 På larvestadiet ................................................................................................................... 41 Årsmelding for Norsk Entomologisk Forening 200 l ........................................................ 43 Regnskap for Norsk Entomologisk Forening 200 l ........................................................... 48 Sommerfuglkongress ......................................................................................................... 50 Insekt-Nytt 26 (3/4) 2001 Nå har NINA utgitt to hefter i serien, hhv. Fredning av insektarter: for 2000 og 200 l. Navnet er Fauna norve­ gica og volum-numreringa følger Serie A. Kun for Jørgen Hatte­ Layouten er både profesjonell og delikat. Dessverre er formålet utvidet til å gjelde maker? zoologi mer generelt, spesielt i sjiktet mellom forvaltning og vitenskap. Redaktøren påpe• Rett før jul kom de første permanente insekt­ ker at det ikke finnes internasjonale tidsskrift fredningene i Norge. Vi har levd med en mid­ som inkluderer slikt stoff, noe som faktisk lertidig fredning av apollo- og mnemosyne­ ikke er sant! Det hun ikke nevner er at det sommerfugl en del år, og nå ble denne fred­ finnes nasjonale alternativer. Norwegian ninga gjort permanent. I tillegg er lista Journal ofEntomologytar foreksempel for­ utvidet med ytterligere seks insektarter. valtningsrettet stoff på insekter! Hvorfor fredning av insekter spør nok man­ ge seg? For å bevare mangfoldet i naturen I siste heftet er det publisert artikler både sier Børge Brende! Har myndighetene tenkt innen entomologi og ornitologi, noe jeg me­ på at leveområdene til disse artene også må ner er uheldig. Som entomolog ønsker jeg å ivaretas, eller er dette en problemstilling finne nasjonalt stoff på insekter i våre ento­ som bare skyves under teppet fordi det vil mologiske tidsskrift. Det er sunt med konkur­ koste? Gjelder fredninga også Kong Salo­ ranse vil nok noen si, men slik er det des­ mo med bulldoser og gravemaskin, eller sverre ikke når det gjelder fagtidsskrift. Hvis bare for Jørgen Hattemaker som ønsker å artikkelen din ikke aksepteres et sted, vil utforske norsk fauna? den sikkert bli akseptert et annet! I forrige nummer av Insekt-Nytt (112-2001) På andre omslagsside kan vi lese at hele re­ skrev jeg om Nesøya i Asker og utbygnings­ daksjonen kommer fra NINA og Direktoratet planene der. Heroringvinge er en avartene for Naturforvaltning (DN), nærmest samtlige som nå er fredet, og denne finnes blant fra Tungasletta. Det er utrolig at de ikke har annet der Asker kommune har vedtatt ut­ klart å finne en eneste fagperson utenfor dette bygging på Nesøya. Avdelingsdirektør i snevre miljøet, noe som klart ville hevet den Miljøverndepartementet Pål Vidar Sollie faglige standarden på bladet. Man skulle tro uttalte til Aftenposten rett før nyttår (se det dreide seg om Tungasletta menighets­ faksimile neste side) at han ikke regnet med blad isteden. Det som også forundrer meg er at fredninga kommer i konflikt med grunn­ at DN har råd til å finansiere dette. eier- eller utbyggerinteresser. Hva så med FN har et forholdsvis begrenset nedslags­ Nesøya? Her må det vel være utbyggerin­ felt, fordi abonnement må tegnes separat. Jeg teresser som truer heroringvingen? Jeg la vil faktisk oppfordre FN-redaksjonen til å fram spørsmålet for Sylvi Ofstad som også snevre inn formålet igjen, og samtidig opp­ er i Miljøverndepartementet, men hun mente fordre zoologer til å benytte våre foreningers at Sollie var blitt tolket galt av Aftenposten. nisjetidsskrift så langt det lar seg gjøre. Vi får virkelig håpe det! Lars Ove Hansen Dette ser ut til å bli den første prøvestenen redaktør for hva fredninga egentlig er verdt. Vil den 2 (f)~ o ...... 'O O' æ, o ~ :;"> S e. >­ s. S ~ g" o :J :g~ p>o.., ~ S < ~ ~ < - - (!) _ """t :::Jo S' ~ s: 0...'" §" ~ Sl S' ::s o.. O ~ 0>0- o '" ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 _. ~ 00 C CD ~:>;"~::S~::S'OP>~ 8 S' g~, Sa ~ -...,C O- ::s "'0<,"(fQ0<:>;" ::s g. en _, :;">~ t"'l>-j0::s P>"'t"'l(ti en= ~ :::;-: ;:>'-<: S 0..0 P> :;:+';:>::s S~grfr ~CD ~ '" S ~ S - :;:''-<: ~ ::to ~ ::s ...... ..... ""' §"~.... ' < ~:>;"~'" o.._::s .... - .... S' lSi <CO ::s ~ P> '" P> o.. 'o.. .... @ ..... 1:; ~ ::s ::tJ t"'l ~ ~ t"" .... ' p>o O' å ~ (fQ - o.. d P M- -.. (JQ mo P> < =-: (IQ (O _. ~ ~ ::r" § 1}l :;"> g ';-' ~. o .... ' <~-..,:>;" ~~lSi I:; (fQ ~ ~:=:~~:>;"O<(ti~ ::ps-§::r: en :o.:: '~~;:>P> , ~ '" .... ~ '" ~ ::s .., M ;:+ '"P> g ""'i o 00 Cf.l..-
Recommended publications
  • Micro-Moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Abhnumber Code

    Micro-Moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Abhnumber Code

    Micro-moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Scottish Adult Mine Case ABHNumber Code Species Vernacular List Grade Grade Grade Comment 1.001 1 Micropterix tunbergella 1 1.002 2 Micropterix mansuetella Yes 1 1.003 3 Micropterix aureatella Yes 1 1.004 4 Micropterix aruncella Yes 2 1.005 5 Micropterix calthella Yes 2 2.001 6 Dyseriocrania subpurpurella Yes 2 A Confusion with fly mines 2.002 7 Paracrania chrysolepidella 3 A 2.003 8 Eriocrania unimaculella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.004 9 Eriocrania sparrmannella Yes 2 A 2.005 10 Eriocrania salopiella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.006 11 Eriocrania cicatricella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.007 13 Eriocrania semipurpurella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.008 12 Eriocrania sangii Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 4.001 118 Enteucha acetosae 0 A 4.002 116 Stigmella lapponica 0 L 4.003 117 Stigmella confusella 0 L 4.004 90 Stigmella tiliae 0 A 4.005 110 Stigmella betulicola 0 L 4.006 113 Stigmella sakhalinella 0 L 4.007 112 Stigmella luteella 0 L 4.008 114 Stigmella glutinosae 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.009 115 Stigmella alnetella 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.010 111 Stigmella microtheriella Yes 0 L 4.011 109 Stigmella prunetorum 0 L 4.012 102 Stigmella aceris 0 A 4.013 97 Stigmella malella Apple Pigmy 0 L 4.014 98 Stigmella catharticella 0 A 4.015 92 Stigmella anomalella Rose Leaf Miner 0 L 4.016 94 Stigmella spinosissimae 0 R 4.017 93 Stigmella centifoliella 0 R 4.018 80 Stigmella ulmivora 0 L Exit-hole must be shown or larval colour 4.019 95 Stigmella viscerella
  • Schutz Des Naturhaushaltes Vor Den Auswirkungen Der Anwendung Von Pflanzenschutzmitteln Aus Der Luft in Wäldern Und Im Weinbau

    Schutz Des Naturhaushaltes Vor Den Auswirkungen Der Anwendung Von Pflanzenschutzmitteln Aus Der Luft in Wäldern Und Im Weinbau

    TEXTE 21/2017 Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit Forschungskennzahl 3714 67 406 0 UBA-FB 002461 Schutz des Naturhaushaltes vor den Auswirkungen der Anwendung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln aus der Luft in Wäldern und im Weinbau von Dr. Ingo Brunk, Thomas Sobczyk, Dr. Jörg Lorenz Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften, Institut für Forstbotanik und Forstzoologie, Tharandt Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes Impressum Herausgeber: Umweltbundesamt Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 Fax: +49 340-2103-2285 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Durchführung der Studie: Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät für Umweltwissenschaften, Institut für Forstbotanik und Forstzoologie, Professur für Forstzoologie, Prof. Dr. Mechthild Roth Pienner Straße 7 (Cotta-Bau), 01737 Tharandt Abschlussdatum: Januar 2017 Redaktion: Fachgebiet IV 1.3 Pflanzenschutz Dr. Mareike Güth, Dr. Daniela Felsmann Publikationen als pdf: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen ISSN 1862-4359 Dessau-Roßlau, März 2017 Das diesem Bericht zu Grunde liegende Vorhaben wurde mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit unter der Forschungskennzahl 3714 67 406 0 gefördert. Die Verantwortung für den Inhalt dieser Veröffentlichung liegt bei den Autorinnen und Autoren. UBA Texte Entwicklung geeigneter Risikominimierungsansätze für die Luftausbringung von PSM Kurzbeschreibung Die Bekämpfung
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached Copy Is Furnished to the Author for Internal Non-Commerci

    This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached Copy Is Furnished to the Author for Internal Non-Commerci

    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/authorsrights Author's personal copy International Journal of Paleopathology 4 (2014) 1–16 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Paleopathology jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpp Invited Commentary Plant paleopathology and the roles of pathogens and insects a,b,c,d,∗ b,1 Conrad C. Labandeira , Rose Prevec a Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA b Department of Geology, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa c College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China d Department of Entomology and BEES Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 29742, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Plant pathologies are the consequence of physical and chemical responses by plants to invasive microor- Received 1 June 2013 ganisms or to imbalances in nutritional or environmental conditions.
  • Lepidoptera) from Siberia and the Russian Far East, with Descriptions of Two New Species·

    Lepidoptera) from Siberia and the Russian Far East, with Descriptions of Two New Species·

    © Entomologica Fennica. 20 September 1996 lncurvariidae and Prodoxidae (Lepidoptera) from Siberia and the Russian Far East, with descriptions of two new species· Mikhail V. Kozlov Kozlov, M.V. 1996: Incurvariidae and Prodoxidae (Lepidoptera) from Siberia and the Russian Far East, with descriptions of two new species - Entomol. Fennica 7:55-62. The Incurvariidae and Prodoxidae of eastern Russia total 19 species in eight genera. Phylloporia bistrigella (Haworth), now reported from Yukon, is tentatively included in the list, although it has not yet been discovered in the Eastern Palaearctic. Four species previously known only from Europe, lncurvaria vetulella (Zetterstedt), I. circulella (Zetterstedt), Lampronia luzella (Hubner), and L. provectella (Heyden) are reported from Siberia; lncurvaria kivatshella Kutenkova is synonymized with 1. vetulella. Lampronia sakhalinella sp. n. is described from Sakhalin. L. altaica Zagulajev is reported from North Korea; the female postabdomen and genitalia of this species are described and figured. The genus Greya Busck, previously known only from North America, is reported from the Palaearctic, with G. variabilis Davis & Pellmyr and G. kononenkoi sp. n. recorded from the Chukchi Peninsula, and G. marginimacu­ lata (Issiki) comb. n. originally described from Japan is expected from the Russian Far East. Among the nine species not known from Europe, one species is reported from Altai only; two show a Beringian distribution; six species are associated with the southern areas of the Far East and Japan, and one is distributed from the Irkutsk region to Sakhalin and Primorye. Mikhail V. Kozlov, Laboratory of Ecological Zoology, University of Turku, FIN-20500 Turku, Finland Received 23 February 1994, accepted 2 November 1995 1.
  • Argyresthia Laevigatella – Larikspedaalmot (Lepidoptera: Argyresthiidae), Nieuw Voor De Belgische Fauna

    Argyresthia Laevigatella – Larikspedaalmot (Lepidoptera: Argyresthiidae), Nieuw Voor De Belgische Fauna

    Argyresthia laevigatella – larikspedaalmot (Lepidoptera: Argyresthiidae), nieuw voor de Belgische fauna Steve Wullaert Samenvatting. Tijdens de 2de excursie van de Werkgroep Bladmineerders in het Wijnendalebos te Torhout (West- Vlaanderen) op 26.vi.2010 vonden we een Argyresthiidae waarvan we lange tijd niet wisten om welke soort het ging. Het exemplaar werd op genitaliën gecontroleerd en gedetermineerd als Argyresthia laevigatella Herrich-Schäffer, 1855. Gegevens over de verspreiding en de biologie van de soort worden meegedeeld. Abstract. During the 2nd excursion of the Workgroup Leafminers in the forest Wijnendalebos at Torhout (West-Flanders) on 26.vi.2010 we found an Argyresthiidae that remained unidentified for a long time. Recently the specimen was dissected and determined as Argyresthia laevigatella Herrich-Schäffer, 1855. Data about its distribution and biology are given. Résumé. Lors de la 2ème excursion de notre groupe de travail dans le Wijnendalebos à Torhout (Flandre Occidentale) le 26.vi.2010, nous avons trouvé un Argyresthiidae que nous n'avons pas pu identifier immédiatement. L'exemplaire a été contrôlé et déterminé ultérieurement comme Argyresthia laevigatella Herrich-Schäffer, 1855 sur base des analyses des genitalia. Des données sur la biologie et la répartition de cette espèce sont discutées. Key words: Argyresthia laevigatella – Faunistics – First record – Belgium. Wullaert S.: Sint-Jorisstraat 24, B-3583 Paal, Belgium. [email protected] Inleiding 1830) – nonnetjeszwammot, een soort die bijna 70 jaar afwezig was in België (Wullaert 2010). Ook vonden we De Argyresthiidae (pedaalmotten), die vroeger een heel wat andere soorten die nog nooit waren subfamilie van de Yponomeutidae was, is nu een aparte waargenomen in de provincie West-Vlaanderen zoals: familie geworden sinds de publicatie van een artikel door Antispila metallella (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) – grote van Nieukerken et.
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An

    Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An

    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
  • Exhibit List

    Exhibit List

    EXHIBIT LIST Reference No: HOL/00521 Petitioner: Ms Sarah Green on behalf of Arthur Daily Trips (Canal Boat Company) Published to Collaboration Area: Wednesday 23-Nov-2016 Page 1 of 163 No Exhibit Name Page 1 A728 Exhibits List.pdf (A728) 3 2 A729 Exhibit 1 route map google.pdf (A729) 4 3 A730 Exhibit 2 water environment water courses.pdf (A730) 5 4 A731 Exhibit 3 cultural heritage.pdf (A731) 6 - 7 5 A732 Exhibit 4 metropolitan Open Land.pdf (A732) 8 - 9 6 A733 Exhibit 5 dragonflies.pdf (A733) 10 - 15 7 A734 Exhibit 6 quality of water.pdf (A734) 16 8 A735 Exhibit 7 Customer activities.pdf (A735) 17 9 A736 Exhibit 8 pylons.pdf (A736) 18 - 24 10 A737 Exhibit 9 Species-List.pdf (A737) 25 - 84 11 A738 Exhibit 10 magic maps.pdf (A738) 85 - 86 12 A739 Exhibit 11 Leisure and tourism Destination.pdf (A739) 87 13 A740 Exhibit 12 continuity through time.pdf (A740) 88 - 91 14 A741 Exhibit 13 The Plans for Denham Country Park.pdf (A741) 92 - 93 15 A742 Exhibit 14 Enabling Works.pdf (A742) 94 - 95 16 A743 Exhibit 15 Water Framework Directive.pdf (A743) 96 - 97 17 A744 Exhibit 16 Ecological_baseline_data_Mammals.pdf (A744) 98 - 108 18 A745 Exhibit 17 Wetlands_Programmes of measures_170907.pdf (A745) 109 - 117 19 A746 Exhibit 18 Guidance_protection animal species.pdf (A746) 118 - 136 20 A747 Exhibit 19 ODPM Circular 06_2005.pdf (A747) 137 - 151 HOL/00521/0001 EXHIBIT LIST Reference No: HOL/00521 Petitioner: Ms Sarah Green on behalf of Arthur Daily Trips (Canal Boat Company) Published to Collaboration Area: Wednesday 23-Nov-2016 Page 2 of 163 No Exhibit
  • Insekt-Nytt • 37 (4) 2012

    Insekt-Nytt • 37 (4) 2012

    Insekt-Nytt • 37 (4) 2012 Insekt-Nytt presenterer populærvitenskape lige Insekt-Nytt • 37 (4) 2012 oversikts- og tema-artikler om insekters (inkl. edderkoppdyr og andre landleddyr) økologi, Medlemsblad for Norsk entomologisk systematikk, fysiologi, atferd, dyregeografi etc. forening Likeledes trykkes artslister fra ulike områder og habitater, ekskursjons rap por ter, naturvern-, Redaktør: nytte- og skadedyrstoff, bibliografier, biografier, Anders Endrestøl his to rikk, «anek do ter», innsamlings- og prepa re- rings tek nikk, utstyrstips, bokanmeldelser m.m. Redaksjon: Vi trykker også alle typer stoff som er relatert Lars Ove Hansen til Norsk entomologisk forening og dets lokal- Jan Arne Stenløkk av de linger: årsrapporter, regnskap, møte- og Leif Aarvik ekskur sjons-rapporter,­­ debattstoff etc. Opprop og Halvard Hatlen kon taktannonser er gratis for foreningens med lem- Hallvard Elven mer. Språket er norsk (svensk eller dansk) gjerne med et kort engelsk abstract for større artik ler. Nett-redaktør: Hallvard Elven Våre artikler refereres i Zoological record. Insekt-Nytt vil prøve å finne sin nisje der vi Adresse: ikke overlapper med vår forenings fagtidsskrift Insekt-Nytt, v/ Anders Endrestøl, Norwegian­­ Journal of Entomology. Origi na le NINA Oslo, vitenskapelige undersøkelser, nye arter for ulike Gaustadalléen 21, faunaregioner og Norge går fortsatt til dette. 0349 Oslo Derimot tar vi gjerne artikler som omhandler Tlf.: 99 45 09 17 «interessante og sjeldne funn», notater om arters [Besøksadr.: Gaustadalléen 21, 0349 Oslo] habitatvalg og levevis etc., selv om det nødven- E-mail: [email protected] digvis ikke er «nytt». Sats, lay-out, paste-up: Redaksjonen Annonsepriser: 1/2 side kr. 1000,– Trykk: Nordberg Aksidenstrykkeri AS, Oslo 1/1 side kr.
  • 1 Introduction

    1 Introduction

    10 February 2010 Our ref: Your ref: Southgate Street Bury St Edmunds Matt Deakin Suffolk Suffolk Coastal District Council IP33 2FE Melton Hill T 0300 060 2384 Woodbridge F 0300 060 1662 IP12 1AU Dear Matt Suffolk Coastal District Council Local Development Framework Habitat Regulations Appropriate Assessment and Clarification Summary of the Core Strategy Thank you for your letter of 13 January 2010 consulting Natural England on the above. Following on from my email of last week, below are Natural England’s full and final comments on the Clarification Summary and the Appropriate Assessment of the Core Strategy. 1. The maths involved in estimating the increase in visitors to European sites was more clearly explained in the Clarification Summary in Point 2, so Natural England are now able to agree to the predicted increase of 2-5% of all visitors. 2. We agree with the comments made in 2.6-2.8 that the predicted growth in population in the Suffolk Coastal District Council area of 0.9 people per dwelling should not be used as the occupancy rate for the proposed development areas; also that the increase in population at these growth locations will not necessarily be balanced out by reductions elsewhere, as the growth locations are situated nearer to the SPAs. The proposed development areas East of Ipswich and in the Felixstowe area could therefore mean significant increases in populations locally and therefore potentially significantly high impacts from recreational disturbance. 3. Whilst the statistics in the ‘Heaths’ studies may show that most people have walked less than 1km to get to Dorset Heaths and 79% walked less than 1km to get to Thames Basin Heaths, we do not believe that means that significant numbers of new residents will NOT walk to the estuaries from the proposed development areas (the studies are related specifically to heaths, the coast is different).
  • New Lithuanian Records of Moths Captured in Beetle Traps

    New Lithuanian Records of Moths Captured in Beetle Traps

    EKOLOGIJA. 2010. Vol. 56. No. 3–4. P. 105–109 DOI: 10.2478/v10055-010-0015-7 © Lietuvos mokslų akademija, 2010 © Lietuvos mokslų akademijos leidykla, 2010 New Lithuanian records of moths captured in beetle traps Henrikas Ostrauskas1, 2*, Moths were captured in multiple funnel traps used to survey xylophagous beetles in nine localities of Lithuania in 2002–2004. A total of 176 moths were caught, representing Povilas Ivinskis2 117 species. Loxostege virescalis (Guenée 1854) was collected at e tokai and is a new record for the Lithuanian fauna. Two very rare Lithuanian moth species, Ochsenheimeria vacculel- 1 State Service of Plant-growing, la Fisher von Röslerstamm 1842 and Spargania luctuata (Denis, Schiff ermüller, 1775), were under the Ministry of Agriculture, trapped at two and one new localities, respectively. In addition, new distribution records Ozo 4A, LT-08200 Vilnius, Lithuania are presented for 10 moth species that are considered to be rare in Lithuania. 2 Nature Research Centre, Key words: traps, Lepidoptera, species distribution, Lithuania Akademijos 2, LT-08412 Vilnius, Lithuania INTRODUCTION tre, Lithuania, Table 1) to maximise beetle trap catch. A sur- vey for xylophagous beetles was conducted in nine localities Th e last catalogue of Lithuanian moths was issued six years (Figure). During 2002, one attractant-baited trap per locality ago, and it comprised 2 455 species found in Lithuania (Ivins- was installed. In 2003–2004, the attractant-baited traps were kis, 2004). Moth fauna in Lithuania was studied thoroughly, supplemented with an additional control trap (no attractant) but the following investigations (Kazlauskas, 2006b; Kaz- in each locality. Th e traps were placed 1.5 m above the ground lauskas, Šlėnys, 2007; Paukštė, 2009) provided new impor- on stakes adjacent to stored timber or in truck control posts tant results.
  • Desktop Biodiversity Report

    Desktop Biodiversity Report

    Desktop Biodiversity Report Lindfield Rural and Urban Parishes ESD/14/65 Prepared for Terry Oliver 10th February 2014 This report is not to be passed on to third parties without prior permission of the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre. Please be aware that printing maps from this report requires an appropriate OS licence. Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre report regarding land at Lindfield Rural and Urban Parishes 10/02/2014 Prepared for Terry Oliver ESD/14/65 The following information is enclosed within this report: Maps Sussex Protected Species Register Sussex Bat Inventory Sussex Bird Inventory UK BAP Species Inventory Sussex Rare Species Inventory Sussex Invasive Alien Species Full Species List Environmental Survey Directory SNCI L61 - Waspbourne Wood; M08 - Costells, Henfield & Nashgill Woods; M10 - Scaynes Hill Common; M18 - Walstead Cemetery; M25 - Scrase Valley Local Nature Reserve; M49 - Wickham Woods. SSSI Chailey Common. Other Designations/Ownership Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty; Environmental Stewardship Agreement; Local Nature Reserve; Notable Road Verge; Woodland Trust Site. Habitats Ancient tree; Ancient woodland; Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh; Ghyll woodland; Traditional orchard. Important information regarding this report It must not be assumed that this report contains the definitive species information for the site concerned. The species data held by the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre (SxBRC) is collated from the biological recording community in Sussex. However, there are many areas of Sussex where the records held are limited, either spatially or taxonomically. A desktop biodiversity report from the SxBRC will give the user a clear indication of what biological recording has taken place within the area of their enquiry.
  • Moths and Management of a Grassland Reserve: Regular Mowing and Temporary Abandonment Support Different Species

    Moths and Management of a Grassland Reserve: Regular Mowing and Temporary Abandonment Support Different Species

    Biologia 67/5: 973—987, 2012 Section Zoology DOI: 10.2478/s11756-012-0095-9 Moths and management of a grassland reserve: regular mowing and temporary abandonment support different species Jan Šumpich1,2 &MartinKonvička1,3* 1Biological Centre CAS, Institute of Entomology, Branišovská 31,CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 2Česká Bělá 212,CZ-58261 Česká Bělá, Czech Republic 3Faculty of Sciences, University South Bohemia, Branišovská 31,CZ-37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic Abstract: Although reserves of temperate seminatural grassland require management interventions to prevent succesional change, each intervention affects the populations of sensitive organisms, including insects. Therefore, it appears as a wise bet-hedging strategy to manage reserves in diverse and patchy manners. Using portable light traps, we surveyed the effects of two contrasting management options, mowing and temporary abandonment, applied in a humid grassland reserve in a submountain area of the Czech Republic. Besides of Macrolepidoptera, we also surveyed Microlepidoptera, small moths rarely considered in community studies. Numbers of individiuals and species were similar in the two treatments, but ordionation analyses showed that catches originating from these two treatments differed in species composition, management alone explaining ca 30 per cent of variation both for all moths and if split to Marcolepidoptera and Microlepidoptera. Whereas a majority of macrolepidopteran humid grassland specialists preferred unmown sections or displayed no association with management, microlepidopteran humid grassland specialists contained equal representation of species inclining towards mown and unmown sections. We thus revealed that even mown section may host valuable species; an observation which would not have been detected had we considered Macrolepidoptera only.