Geothermal Resource Potential of the Safford-San Simon Basin, Arizona

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geothermal Resource Potential of the Safford-San Simon Basin, Arizona GEOTHERMAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE SAFFORD-SAN SIMON BASIN, ARIZONA by James C. Witcher Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 81-26 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Suite #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 Funded By The U.S. Department ofEnergy Contract Number DE-FC07-79ID12009 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Arizona Geological Survey standards NOTICE This report was prepared to document work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor its agents, the United States Department of Energy, nor any federal employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, products or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference to a company or product name does not imply approval or recommen­ dation of the product by the Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology or the U.S. Department of Energy to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. i TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE List Of Figures List of Tables List 5f Appendices Introduction 1 Land Status 3 Previous Work 4 Regional Setting 6 Regional Stratigraphy and Structure 12 Basement structure of the northern Safford-San Simon Basin 14 Basement structure of the southern Safford San Simon Basin 19 Basin and Range 21 Basin-Fill sediments in the Safford area 23 Basin-Fill sediments in the San Simon area 27 Indian Hot Springs-Gila Valley 29 Introduction 29 Geochemistry 29 Structure 29 Geothermometry 35 Conclusion 35 Buena Vista Area 37 Introduction 37 Geochemistry 37 Geology and Reservoir Characteristics 40 Cactus Flat-Artesia Area 50 Geology 50 Temperature Gradients 53 Mercury Soil Survey 59 Ground Water Chemistry and Geothermometry 61 Conclusion 68 ii Table of Contents (cont'd.) PAGE San Simon 69 Introduction 69 Thermal Regime 69 Geology 71 Geohydrology 74 Chemistry 74 Conclusion 77 Bowie Area 78 Introduction 78 Geochemistry 78 Structure and Stratigraphy 79 Active Tectonism 85 Conclusion 86 Whitlock Mountains Area 88 Tables 89-10.9 Appendices 110-120 Bibliography 121-131 iii FIGURES PAGE FIGURE 1 Map of thermal wells and springs (pocket) FIGURE 2 Map of land status (pocket) FIGURE 3 Location map of study area and physiographic provinces 7 FIGURE 4 Regional lineaments and crustal discontinuities 9 FIGURE 5 Map of inferred Tertiary basement lithology in southeastern Arizona 15 FIGURE 6 Major geologic structure in the Safford area 30 FIGURE 7 Schlumberger resistivity profile near Safford 33 FIGURE 8 Map showing areas with low electrical resistivity and wells which encounter evaporite minerals or brine 34 FIGURE 9 Map of fluoride distribution in the Buena Vista area 38 FIGURE 10 Dissolved carbon dioxide versus excess silica for ground water in the Buena Vista area 39 FIGURE 11 Subsurface geology and stratigraphic cross section of the hot well area near Buena Vista 41 FIGURE 12 Reconnaissance geologic map of the Buena Vista geo­ thermal area 43 FIGURE 13 Temperature versus depth profile of deep well east of Buena Vista 47 FIGURE 14 Complete Bouguer gravity map of the Buena Vista area showing areas with copper mineralization 48 FIGURE 15 Reconnaissance geologic map of the Cactus Flat-Artesia area 51 FIGURE 16 Bouguer gravity map of the Safford-San Simon Basin (pocket) FIGURE 17 Aeromagnetic map of the Safford-San Simon Basin (pocket) FIGURE 18 Location map of Dipole-Dipole electrical resistivity profiles 7 and 8 54 iv FIGURES PAGE FIGURE 19 Subsurface resistivity models and pseudosections of resistivity profiles 7 and 8 55 FIGURE 20 Temperature versus depth well data in the Cactus Flat-Artesia area 57 FIGURE 21 Map showing the area of high temperature gradients in the Artesia area. 58 FIGURE 22 Map showing distribution of soil mercury in the Cactus- Flat Artesia area 60 FIGURE 23 Anion ratios versus lithium in Cactus Flat-Artesia area ground water 62 FIGURE 24 Dissolved carbon dioxide versus excess silica in Cactus Flat-Artesia area ground water 66 FIGURE 25 Temperature versus depth data for artesian wells in the San Simon area 70 FIGURE 26 Structure contour map of the base of the blue clay unit in San Simon area 72 FIGURE 27 Structure contour map of the top of the blue clay unit in the San Simon area 73 FIGURE 28 Map of water level of artesian wells in the San Simon area in 1915 75 FIGURE 29 Estimated temperature gradients of artesian wells in the San Simon area in 1915, 76 FIGURE 30 Map showing distribution of Na-K-Ca geothermometer tem- peratures in the Bowie area 80 FIGURE 31 A gravity subsurface model of the Bowie area 81 FIGURE 32 Bouguer gravity map of Bowie area compared to locations of ground-water falls 82 FIGURE 33 Topographic profiles across the San Simon Valley 83 FIGURE 34 Map of water table in the Bowie area in 1975 84 v TABLES P~E TABLE 1 Wells with measured temperatures greater than 30oC in the Safford-San Simon Basin, Arizona 89 TABLE 2 Chemical analysis of ground waters in the Safford-San Simon area. 94-103 2A Analyses of Gila Valley-Indian Hot Springs ground waters 95 2B Analyses of Buena Vista area ground waters 96 2C Analyses of Cactus Flat-Artesia area ground waters 98 2D Analyses of San Simon area ground waters 100 2E Analyses of Bowie area ground waters WI 2F Analyses of Whitlock Mountains area ground water W2 TABLE 3 Silica and Na-K-Ca geothermometers for ground water in the Safford-San Simon area. 103-108 3A Geothermometers for the Gila Valley-Indian Hot Springs area. 103 3B Geothermometers for the Buena Vista area W4 3C Geothermometers for the Cactus Flat-Artesia area 105 3D Geothermometers for the San Simon area 106 3E Geothermometers for the Bowie area 107 3F Geothermometers for the Whitlock Mountains area W8 TABLE 4 Summary table showing aquifers in the Cactus Flat area with temperatures and estimated temperature gradients 109 vi APPENDICES PAGE APPENDIX 1 Selected:dri11ers logs 110-114 APPENDIX 2 pH correction of dissolved silica 115-118 APPENDIX 3 Arizona Bureau of Mines Memorandum on the Funk 119-120 Benevolent No. 1 Fee well near San Simon vii INTRODUCTION o In the Safford-San Simon Basin, thermal water (>30 C) flows from numerous artesian wells and springs. These wells and springs are used by several min- eral baths in the Safford area. The most notable hot water occurrence in the area is Indian Hot Springs located northwest of Safford near Fort Thomas. Nearly all wells deeper than 200 meters in the Safford area flow naturally o and have discharge temperatures greater than 30 C. Deepest of these wells, the 1,148 m Underwriters Syndicate #1 Mack oil and gas test or Mary Mack well near Pima, is indicative of a substantial low-temperature geothermal resource. The well is no longer flowing and it is believed that the pressurized water broke through the shallow and deteriorated casing after the well flow was temporarily shut-in some years ago. However, in 1933, Knechtel (1938) reports o that this well had an artesian flow of2,500 gpm of 59 C, sodium chloride water with 2,251 parts per million (ppm) total dissolved solids (TDS). Figure 1 is a map showing the location of the Safford-San Simon area. Hot springs and areas with hot wells are also shown. The study area, between Fort Thomas and San Simon, straddles a valley which is drained by the Gila and San Simon rivers. The study area is bounded by rugged mountains on the south- west and northeast sides. Topography within the study area is mostly gentle and easily accessible. Agriculture is mostly confined to the Gila River flood plain between Fort Thomas and San Jose, and along Interstate 10 from Bowie to San Simon. Important geothermal anomalies occur in all these agricultural areas. Communities in the area are closely situated to the agriculture. Rising costs and supply problems for hydrocarbon fuels have intensified the need for alternative energy sources. Developing the potential geothermal resources in the Safford-San Simon basin area could reduce energy costs and assure the area of a constant energy supply. Also, new agriculture-related 1 businesses such as food processing, grain drying or ethanol production using geothermal energy are possible. This report summarizes the geologic and geohydrologic features important to the geothermal regime of the Safford-San Simon area. The purpose of the investigation is to define areas in the Safford-San Simon basin that have potential geothermal resources suitable for direct use. Several things are required to make geothermal energy feasible. The most important requirement is the availability of a suitable geothermal resource. In order to determine resource suitability for a particular application, several questions concerning the potential resource need answering before planning and development can proceed: Is the potential resource beneath land which is favorable for development; or, in other words, what is the land own­ ership, topography, and access? What depth is the reservoir? What production temperatures are likely? What is the chemical quality of the geothermal water? What are the probable reservoir rocks and their reservoir properties? What are the subsurface geologic controls on the permeability and location of the reservoir? What is the geothermal heat source and the natural heat loss of the potential resource? Direct-use applications may use geothermal water between 300 C and l800 C. The chemical quality and production requirements vary depending on the type of utilization and heat requirement. 2 Land Status Figure 2 shows land ownership in the Safford-San Simon basin, Arizona.
Recommended publications
  • Camp Chiricahua July 13-25, 2021 © 2020
    CAMP CHIRICAHUA JULY 13-25, 2021 © 2020 Red-faced Warbler © Michael O’Brien Camp Chiricahua, co-sponsored by Black Swamp Bird Observatory (Ohio), the American Birding Association, and Leica Sport Optics, offers young naturalists between the ages of 14 and 18 the opportunity to explore the biologically rich ecosystems of Southeast Arizona, centering on the famed Chiricahua Mountains. The primary focus is on the birdlife of the Chiricahuas (pronounced Cheer-ick-ow-wahs) and other important sites in Southeast Arizona, but we will take time to observe all facets of nature and emphasize patient field observation, note taking, and learning bird sounds. The camp is set in a productive learning environment in which participants are educated on ecology, habitats, and ecosystems, and on increasing observation skills. Daily activities are based on thorough exploration of each of the distinct regions we visit. Hikes, field trips, and discussions will complement free time, during which campers will have the luxury of exploring their natural surroundings in small groups. Camp Chiricahua, Page 2 Starting in Tucson, we will first do some desert birding on the east side of town before ascending Mount Lemmon in the Catalina Mountains. Two nights of camping in the forested highlands will acquaint us with the “sky islands” so very characteristic of the borderlands of Southeast Arizona. Cave Creek Ranch © Michael O’Brien Much of our time is spent in the Chiricahuas, an 80-mile long mountain range rising out of the Chihuahuan Desert to nearly 10,000 feet, and encompassing five distinct life zones. Long famous amongst naturalists for its biological diversity and rich assortment of “Mexican” type birds that inhabit these mountains, the Chiricahuas are also a place of considerable scenic grandeur.
    [Show full text]
  • HERDS in SAN SIMON VALLEY Nhat Has Happened to the Promised Land of Arizonats Oldtime Cattlemen by Will C. Barnes Sometime Along
    C) HERDS IN SAN SIMON VALLEY Nhat Has Happened to the Promised Land of Arizonats Oldtime Cattlemen By Will C. Barnes Sometime along in the early fall of 1882, I set forth from Fort Apache, in Arizona, seeking a suitable location for a modest bunch of cattle. There was plenty of unoccupied range then in the Southwest,but being enthusiastic about the cattle business, I,wanted nothing but the :best, a "top notcher". An old Army officer who had chased Apaches from one end of Arizona to the other, advised me to look over the San Simon Valley, on the east side of the Graham Mountains. I had heard Of the Valley from stories re- lated to me, even when it Was known as Valle de Sauz, meaning "Willow Valley", because of the willow thickets along the upper reaches. So I set out in that direction, full of hope. A ten-day cruise over San Simon proved the old Army officer was an excellent judge of a stock range. My only disappointment mas that the willows were gone. The Valley mas found to be practically unoccupied, a well watered, well grazed area about sixty miles long and forty miles wide, including the longmountain slopes on each side. It contained, I reckoned, about 750,000 acres of grazing land. San Simon joined the wide valley of the Gila River near where a store had been established as early as 1872, and around which settlers had located their homes for safety from the Apaches. Their farms were irrigated by means of small brush and rock dams which turned the Gila waters onto their fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Tombstone by JOSEF and JOYCE MUENCH
    HISTORIC PANORAMAS XX Tombstone By JOSEF and JOYCE MUENCH From this early mining town in southeastern Arizona has come the rich tradition of the Old West—the wickedness, gun-play, feud between law and outlaw, stage holdups and Indian raids. Even with surface changes of electric lights and paved streets, Tombstone is history, from the Bird Cage Theater (now a museum), the Crystal Palace saloon, the newspaper Epitaph, and the world-famous Lady Banksia Rose to Boothill Cemetery at the edge of town. Most of the early buildings date from 1879 to 1882. Two years before the first date Ed Schieffelin discovered the Lucky Cuss, instead of the tombstone he had been warned was all he could expect in the area. The early 1880s witnessed the Earp-Clanton feud, climaxed by the notorious battle at the O.K. Corral. It was after this that Sheriff Slaughter ordered crooks out of town and saw to it that they went. Water in the mines, still believed to hoard riches, closed them down, but Tombstone, "the town too tough to die," is now a pleasant resort community with an incomparable cli- mate and all its glowing memories. DESERT MAGAZINE DESERT CALENDAR September 27-October 5—New Mex- ico State Fair, Albuquerque. October 1-5—San Bernardino County Fair, Victorville, California. October 1-10—Aspencades to Carson National Forest, from Taos, N.M. October 2-5—Eighth Annual Desert Empire Fair, Ridgecrest, Calif. October 3-4—Candlelight Procession on 3rd, Feast Day of St. Francis de Assissi on 4th, Ranchos de Taos and Santa Fe.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulphur Spring Valley. Arizona
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 320 GEOLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES or SULPHUR SPRING VALLEY. ARIZONA BY O. E. MEINZER AND F. C. KELTON WITH A SECTION ON AGRICULTURE BY R. H. FORBES Prepared in cooperation with the Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1913 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction, by O. E. Meinzer.............................................. 9 Geographic sketch...................................................... 9 Historical sketch...................................................... 11 Industrial development..................................... 1........... 15 Relation of the Indians to water supplies................................ 16 Relation of industrial development to water supplies..................... 18 Purpose and scope of the investigation................................... 19 Physiography and drainage, by 0. E. Meinzer..............................;. 20 General features........................................................ 20 Mountains............................................................. 21 Stream-built slopes..................................................... 23 Origin............................................................. 23 Shape and size..................................................... 24 Stream-built divides............................................... 25 Relation of axial watercourses to size of slopes........................ 26 Relation of alkali flat to size of slopes................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological Findings of the Battle of Apache Pass, Fort Bowie National Historic Site Non-Sensitive Version
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Resource Stewardship and Science Archeological Findings of the Battle of Apache Pass, Fort Bowie National Historic Site Non-Sensitive Version Natural Resource Report NPS/FOBO/NRR—2016/1361 ON THIS PAGE Photograph (looking southeast) of Section K, Southeast First Fort Hill, where many cannonball fragments were recorded. Photograph courtesy National Park Service. ON THE COVER Top photograph, taken by William Bell, shows Apache Pass and the battle site in 1867 (courtesy of William A. Bell Photographs Collection, #10027488, History Colorado). Center photograph shows the breastworks as digitized from close range photogrammatic orthophoto (courtesy NPS SOAR Office). Lower photograph shows intact cannonball found in Section A. Photograph courtesy National Park Service. Archeological Findings of the Battle of Apache Pass, Fort Bowie National Historic Site Non-sensitive Version Natural Resource Report NPS/FOBO/NRR—2016/1361 Larry Ludwig National Park Service Fort Bowie National Historic Site 3327 Old Fort Bowie Road Bowie, AZ 85605 December 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiricahua National Monument Historic Designed Landscape Historic Name
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being nominated, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property Chiricahua National Monument Historic Designed Landscape historic name other name/site number Wonderland of Rocks; Rhyolite Park; The Pinnacles; Say Yahdesut “Point of Rocks” 2. Location street & number: Chiricahua National Monument (CHIR) 12856 E. Rhyolite Canyon Road _____not for publication city/town: Willcox___________________________________________________________ _X_ vicinity state: Arizona_____ code: AZ __________ county: Cochise_________ code: 003_____ zip code: 85643___ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ¨ nomination ¨ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places an meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ¨ meets ¨ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • You Can Learn More About the Chiricahuas
    Douglas RANGER DISTRICT www.skyislandaction.org 2-1 State of the Coronado Forest DRAFT 11.05.08 DRAFT 11.05.08 State of the Coronado Forest 2-2 www.skyislandaction.org CHAPTER 2 Chiricahua Ecosystem Management Area The Chiricahua Mountain Range, located in the Natural History southeastern corner of the Coronado National Forest, The Chiricahua Mountains are known for their is one of the largest Sky Islands in the U.S. portion of amazing variety of terrestrial plants, animals, and the Sky Island region. The range is approximately 40 invertebrates. They contain exceptional examples of miles long by 20 miles wide with elevations ranging ecosystems that are rare in southern Arizona. While from 4,400 to 9,759 feet at the summit of Chiricahua the range covers only 0.5% of the total land area in Peak. The Chiricahua Ecosystem Management Area Arizona, it contains 30% of plant species found in (EMA) is the largest Management Area on the Forest Arizona, and almost 50% of all bird species that encompassing 291,492 acres of the Chiricahua and regularly occur in the United States.1 The Chiricahuas Pedragosa Mountains. form part of a chain of mountains spanning from Protected by remoteness, the Chiricahuas remain central Mexico into southern Arizona. Because of one of the less visited ranges on the Coronado their proximity to the Sierra Madre, they support a National Forest. Formerly surrounded only by great diversity of wildlife found nowhere else in the ranches, the effects of Arizona’s explosive 21st century United States such as the Mexican Chickadee, whose population growth are beginning to reach the flanks only known breeding locations in the country are in of the Chiricahuas.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiricahua Wilderness Area, Arizona
    STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS WILDERNESS AREAS CHIRICAHUA WILDERNESS AREA, ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1385-A Mineral Resources of the Chiricahua Wilderness Area, Cochise County, Arizona By HARALD DREWES, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, and FRANK E. WILLIAMS, U.S. BUREAU OF MINES With a section on AEROMAGNETIC INTERPRETATION By GORDON P. EATON, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS - WILDERNESS AREAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1385-A An evaluation of the mineral potential of the area UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-600165 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington, D. C. 20402 - Price $1.35 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-02425 STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS WILDERNESS AREAS Under the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, Sept. 3, 1964) certain areas within the National forests pre­ viously classified as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preser­ vation System as wilderness areas. The act provides that the Geological Survey and the Bureau of Mines survey these wilderness areas to determine the mineral values, if any, that may be present. The act also directs that results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and submitted to the President and Con­ gress. This bulletin reports the results of a mineral survey of the Chiricahua Wilderness, Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report
    United States Department of Agriculture Coronado National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report Forest Service Southwestern Region Coronado National Forest July 2017 Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrical-Analog Analysis of Hydrologic Data for San Simon Basin Cochise and Graham Counties, Arizona
    Electrical-Analog Analysis of Hydrologic Data for San Simon Basin Cochise and Graham Counties, Arizona By NATALIE D. WHITE and WILLIAM F. HARDT CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HYDROLOGY OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1809-R Prepared in cooperation with the Arizona State Land Department UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 60 cents (paper coyer) CONTENTS Page Abstract __ ______________________________________________________ Rl Introduction._____________________________________________________ 2 Location and extent of the area._--____-___---_______________.__ 2 Previous studies_______________________________________________ 5 Purpose and scope__--------__-----__-___--_-__-___--_--___-___ 6 Methods of analysis_________-_-______-________________-____________ 6 Hydrologic system of the basin_----_----__--__----_-____-_- _________ 8 Hydrologic characteristics.____-_----__--_--__--______-__-_-____ 8 Flow-net analysis____-______-________-_-________-__________ 10 Well-data analysis__________-____-_____________--_________. 12 Analysis of the effects of ground-water withdrawal.____________ 17 Volume of water available from the system.______________________ 18 Analysis of the hydrologic system by electrical-analog model------------ 19 Basis of electrical-analog model________________________________ 20 Construction of the model__-_---_-_-_-_-----_-_--__---__---_--_ 21 Using the analog model-__ _____________________________________ 24 Summary and conclusions------------------------------------------ 27 References cited ______-_--__---_____--___-_--_-___-__----__--__-- 29 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates are In pocket) PLATE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Day -- Ap Ril 6, 1959
    Southeastern Arizona-Trip V-2 GENERAL GEOLOGY OF SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA TRIP V, ROAD LOG (C ontinue d) Second Day -- Ap ril 6, 1959 Leaders: E. B. Mayo and W. D. Pye Driving Distance: 225. 7 miles Logged Distance: 216. 9 miles Starting Time : 7:00 A. M. General Statement: The route leads northward, along the axis of Sulphur Spring s Valley to Elfrida. From Elfrida the course is westward to the southe rn Dragoon Mountains and the old mining camps of Gleeson and Courtland. It will then continue northward along Sulphur Spring s Valley, finally turning eastward to ascend the out­ wash apron of the Chiricahua Mountains. The route will then head northward and northeastward over Apache Pas s, and on to Bowie and State Highway 86. From Bowie the route is southwestward to Willcox, then along the no rthern margin of Willcox Playa. It ascends southwestward past the northern edge of the Red Bird Hills, pas ses betwe en the Gunnison Hills and Steele Hill s, crosses the Little Dragoon Mountains via Texas Canyon, and de scends to Benson on the San Pedro River. Beyond Benson the highway asc ends we stward betw een the Whetstone Mountain s on the south and the Rincons on the north to Mountain View, and on to Tucson. The party will see: (1) the thrust blocks, intrusions and abandoned mining camps of the southern Dragoon Mountains; (2) some of the volcanic rocks of the northern Chiricahua Mountains ; (3) the Precam­ brian granite and the Cretaceous and Paleozoic sections in Apache Pass; (4) Willcox Playa, lowe st part of Sulphur Sp ring s Valley; (5) the Paleozoic section of the Gunnison Hills, and the young er Precambrian Apache and Paleozoic sequences of the Little Dragoon Mountains; (6) the porphyritic granite of Texas Canyon; and (7) the steeply-dipping Miocene (?) Pantano beds west of Benson.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiricahua National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Chiricahua National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/081 THIS PAGE: Close up of the many rhyolitic hoodoos within the Monument ON THE COVER: Scenic vista in Chiricahua NM NPS Photos by: Ron Kerbo Chiricahua National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/081 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 June 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Denver, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; "how to" resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly-published newsletters.
    [Show full text]