The Bulb Log Index
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Summary of Offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019
Summary of offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019 3841 Number of items in BX 301 thru BX 463 1815 Number of unique text strings used as taxa 990 Taxa offered as bulbs 1056 Taxa offered as seeds 308 Number of genera This does not include the SXs. Top 20 Most Oft Listed: BULBS Times listed SEEDS Times listed Oxalis obtusa 53 Zephyranthes primulina 20 Oxalis flava 36 Rhodophiala bifida 14 Oxalis hirta 25 Habranthus tubispathus 13 Oxalis bowiei 22 Moraea villosa 13 Ferraria crispa 20 Veltheimia bracteata 13 Oxalis sp. 20 Clivia miniata 12 Oxalis purpurea 18 Zephyranthes drummondii 12 Lachenalia mutabilis 17 Zephyranthes reginae 11 Moraea sp. 17 Amaryllis belladonna 10 Amaryllis belladonna 14 Calochortus venustus 10 Oxalis luteola 14 Zephyranthes fosteri 10 Albuca sp. 13 Calochortus luteus 9 Moraea villosa 13 Crinum bulbispermum 9 Oxalis caprina 13 Habranthus robustus 9 Oxalis imbricata 12 Haemanthus albiflos 9 Oxalis namaquana 12 Nerine bowdenii 9 Oxalis engleriana 11 Cyclamen graecum 8 Oxalis melanosticta 'Ken Aslet'11 Fritillaria affinis 8 Moraea ciliata 10 Habranthus brachyandrus 8 Oxalis commutata 10 Zephyranthes 'Pink Beauty' 8 Summary of offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019 Most taxa specify to species level. 34 taxa were listed as Genus sp. for bulbs 23 taxa were listed as Genus sp. for seeds 141 taxa were listed with quoted 'Variety' Top 20 Most often listed Genera BULBS SEEDS Genus N items BXs Genus N items BXs Oxalis 450 64 Zephyranthes 202 35 Lachenalia 125 47 Calochortus 94 15 Moraea 99 31 Moraea -
М.М. Силантьева MM Silantyeva А.Ю. Гребенникова A.Ju
«Проблемы ботаники Южной Сибири и Монголии» – XII Международная научно-практическая конференция УДК 581(571.150) М.М. Силантьева M.M. Silantyeva А.Ю. Гребенникова A.Ju. Grebennikova А.О. Кирина A.O. Kirina П.А. Косачев P.A. Kosatschev Н.В. Елесова N.V. Elesova Н.В. Овчарова N.V. Ovcharova А.Е. Гребенникова A.E. Grebennikova НОВЫЕ СВЕДЕНИЯ О РАСПРОСТРАНЕНИИ РЕДКИХ И ИСЧЕЗАЮЩИХ ВИДОВ РАСТЕНИЙ, ВКЛЮЧЕННЫХ В «КРАСНЫЕ КНИГИ» ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОГО И РЕГИОНАЛЬНОГО УРОВНЯ НА ТЕРРИТОРИИ АЛТАЙСКОГО КРАЯ NEW INFORMATION ABOUT REDISTRIBUTING OF RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF PLANTS LISTED IN THE RED BOOK OF THE FEDERAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL IN THE ALTAI TERRITORY В статье приведены новые данные и уточнены сведения о местонахождении 18 охраняемых видов растений. Из них на уровне субъекта федерации охраняются 18 – в числе которых ранг государствен- ной охраны имеют 3 вида, а также 14 видов на сопредельных территориях (Республика Казахстан, Но- восибирская область, Кемеровская область и Республика Алтай). Международные усилия по сохранению биоразнообразия продолжаются всего около 100 лет. Потеря любого вида растений и животных – это потеря не только самого организма, но и изменение в составе того сообщества, где обитал данный вид, это зачастую далеко идущие последствия, которые мы не можем осоз- нать в настоящее время. Создание «Красных книг» разного ранга стало первым шагом в борьбе за сохране- ние животных и растений, подошедших к черте, за которой нет возврата. «Красные книги» стали инстру- ментом инвентаризации редких и находящихся под угрозой исчезновения видов, научным фундаментом их охраны, главным оружием экологического просвещения. Первый список редких и исчезающих видов растений для территории края был представлен в кол- лективной монографии «Редкие и исчезающие растения Сибири» (1980). -
Chapter Vii Table of Contents
CHAPTER VII TABLE OF CONTENTS VII. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES CITED........................................................................1 Appendix 1: Description of Vegetation Databases......................................................................1 Appendix 2: Suggested Stocking Levels......................................................................................8 Appendix 3: Known Plants of the Desolation Watershed.........................................................15 Literature Cited............................................................................................................................25 CHAPTER VII - APPENDICES & REFERENCES - DESOLATION ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS i VII. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES CITED Appendix 1: Description of Vegetation Databases Vegetation data for the Desolation ecosystem analysis was stored in three different databases. This document serves as a data dictionary for the existing vegetation, historical vegetation, and potential natural vegetation databases, as described below: • Interpretation of aerial photography acquired in 1995, 1996, and 1997 was used to characterize existing (current) conditions. The 1996 and 1997 photography was obtained after cessation of the Bull and Summit wildfires in order to characterize post-fire conditions. The database name is: 97veg. • Interpretation of late-1930s and early-1940s photography was used to characterize historical conditions. The database name is: 39veg. • The potential natural vegetation was determined for each polygon in the analysis -
Show Schedules 2012 Ver Finale
119. 1 pan rock plant native to the Southern Hemisphere 120. 1 pan dwarf shurb THE SCOTTISH ROCK GARDEN CLUB 121. 1 pan rock plant raised from seed by the exhibitor. Date of sowing to be stated. Botanical notes permitted, AGS note 23(e) SECTION III Open to Amateur Members of AGS and SRGC who have not won an AGS Bronze Merit Medal or more than ten First Prizes at Shows run by either Society prior to 1st January 2011. Pan size not to exceed 19 cm outside diameter 130. 3 pans rock plants, distinct 131. 1 pan rock plant in flower 132. 1 pan Gentiana 133. 1 pan Cyclamen 134. 1 pan bulbous plant 135. 1 pan rock plant native to the Southern Hemisphere 136. 1 pan rock plant native to the Northern Hemisphere 137. 1 pan rock plant for foliage effect 138. 1 pan dwarf shrub or conifer 139. 1 pan rock plant. For exhibitors who have never won a first prize at an AGS or SRGC National show SHOW SCHEDULES 2012 DUNBLANE EARLY BULB DISPLAY 18th February* BLACKPOOL SHOW 17th March* STIRLING SHOW 24th March† New Location - Show this Year is in KINCARDINE NORTHUMBERLAND 40th ANNIVERSARY SHOW, HEXHAM 31st March EDINBURGH & THE LOTHIANS SHOW 14th April* PERTH SHOW 21st April HIGHLAND SHOW, NAIRN 28th April GLASGOW SHOW 5th May* ABERDEEN SHOW 19th May* GARDENING SCOTLAND (Joint Rock Only) 2nd June* LATE BULB DISPLAY, RBGE 8th September DISCUSSION WEEKEND, DUMFRIES 29th - 30th September NEWCASTLE SHOW 13th October* AGM 10th November† *Joint Rock Garden Plant Committee meetings 48 †Photographic/Art Competition SHOWS 2012 SHOW RULES 1. -
Alplains 2013 Seed Catalog P.O
ALPLAINS 2013 SEED CATALOG P.O. BOX 489, KIOWA, CO 80117-0489, U.S.A. Three ways to contact us: FAX: (303) 621-2864 (24 HRS.) email: [email protected] website: www.alplains.com Dear Growing Friends: Welcome to our 23rd annual seed catalog! The summer of 2012 was long, hot and brutal, with drought afflicting most of the U.S. Most of my botanical explorations were restricted to Idaho, Wash- ington, Oregon and northern California but even there moisture was below average. In a year like this, seeps, swales, springs, vestigial snowbanks and localized rainstorms became much more important in my search for seeding plants. On the Snake River Plains of southern Idaho and the scab- lands of eastern Washington, early bloomers such as Viola beckwithii, V. trinervata, Ranunculus glaberrimus, Ranunculus andersonii, Fritillaria pudica and Primula cusickiana put on quite a show in mid-April but many populations could not set seed. In northern Idaho, Erythronium idahoense flowered extensively, whole meadows were covered with thousands of the creamy, pendant blossoms. One of my most satisfying finds in the Hells Canyon area had to be Sedum valens. The tiny glaucous rosettes, surround- ed by a ring of red leaves, are a succulent connoisseur’s dream. Higher up, the brilliant blue spikes of Synthyris missurica punctuated the canyon walls. In southern Oregon, the brilliant red spikes of Pedicularis densiflora lit up the Siskiyou forest floor. Further north in Oregon, large populations of Erythronium elegans, Erythronium oregonum ssp. leucandrum, Erythro- nium revolutum, trilliums and sedums provided wonderful picture-taking opportunities. Eriogonum species did well despite the drought, many of them true xerics. -
Reproductive Biology of Erythronium Grandiflorum Pursh Varieties Grandiflorum and Candidum (Piper) Abrams (Liliaceae)" (1986)
University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1986 Reproductive biology of Erythronium grandiflorum Pursh arietiesv grandiflorum and candidum (Piper) Abrams (Liliaceae) Jane K. Fritz-Sheridan The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Fritz-Sheridan, Jane K., "Reproductive biology of Erythronium grandiflorum Pursh varieties grandiflorum and candidum (Piper) Abrams (Liliaceae)" (1986). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 7403. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/7403 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th is is an unpublished manuscript in which copyright sub s is t s . Any FURTHER REPRINTING OF ITS CONTENTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE AUTHOR. Ma n s fie ld L ibrary U n iv e r s it y of Montana Date : 1 98-6 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF ER'iTHRONtUM GRANDIFLORUM PURSH VARIETIES GRANDtFLORUM m o CANDIDUM (PIPER) ABRAMS (LILIACEAE) by Jane K. Fritz-Sheridan B. S ., Michigan State U n iv e rs ity , 1972 M. S., University of Montana, 1981 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts U n iv e rs ity of Montana 1906 Approved by ïhairm^, B^ard of Examiners D^n, Graduate SC^^I /f, Date UMI Number: EP38204 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction Is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. -
The Resurrection Genome of Boea Hygrometrica: a Blueprint for Survival of Dehydration
The resurrection genome of Boea hygrometrica: A blueprint for survival of dehydration Lihong Xiaoa, Ge Yanga, Liechi Zhanga, Xinhua Yangb, Shuang Zhaob, Zhongzhong Jia, Qing Zhoub, Min Hub, Yu Wanga, Ming Chenb,YuXua, Haijing Jina, Xuan Xiaoa, Guipeng Hua, Fang Baoa, Yong Hua, Ping Wana, Legong Lia, Xin Dengc, Tingyun Kuangd, Chengbin Xiange, Jian-Kang Zhuf,g,1, Melvin J. Oliverh,1, and Yikun Hea,1 aSchool of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; bBeijing Genomics Institute-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China; cKey Laboratory of Plant Resources and dKey Laboratory of Photobiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China; eSchool of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230022, China; fShanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China; gDepartment of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907; and hPlant Genetics Research Unit, Midwest Area, Agricultural Research Service, United State Department of Agriculture, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 Contributed by Jian-Kang Zhu, March 26, 2015 (sent for review February 10, 2015; reviewed by Sagadevan G. Mundree and Andrew J. Wood) “Drying without dying” is an essential trait in land plant evolution. plants (5, 8), and a system approach is contemplated (4), efforts Unraveling how a unique group of angiosperms, the Resurrection are hampered by the lack of a sequenced genome for any of the Plants, survive desiccation of their leaves and roots has been ham- resurrection plants. To fill this critical gap, we sequenced the pered by the lack of a foundational genome perspective. -
Sierra Nevada Framework FEIS Chapter 3
table of contrents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Part 4.6 4.6. Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Fungi4.6. Fungi Introduction Part 3.1 of this chapter describes landscape-scale vegetation patterns. Part 3.2 describes the vegetative structure, function, and composition of old forest ecosystems, while Part 3.3 describes hardwood ecosystems and Part 3.4 describes aquatic, riparian, and meadow ecosystems. This part focuses on botanical diversity in the Sierra Nevada, beginning with an overview of botanical resources and then presenting a more detailed analysis of the rarest elements of the flora, the threatened, endangered, and sensitive (TES) plants. The bryophytes (mosses and liverworts), lichens, and fungi of the Sierra have been little studied in comparison to the vascular flora. In the Pacific Northwest, studies of these groups have received increased attention due to the President’s Northwest Forest Plan. New and valuable scientific data is being revealed, some of which may apply to species in the Sierra Nevada. This section presents an overview of the vascular plant flora, followed by summaries of what is generally known about bryophytes, lichens, and fungi in the Sierra Nevada. Environmental Consequences of the alternatives are only analyzed for the Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plants, which include vascular plants, several bryophytes, and one species of lichen. 4.6.1. Vascular plants4.6.1. plants The diversity of topography, geology, and elevation in the Sierra Nevada combine to create a remarkably diverse flora (see Section 3.1 for an overview of landscape patterns and vegetation dynamics in the Sierra Nevada). More than half of the approximately 5,000 native vascular plant species in California occur in the Sierra Nevada, despite the fact that the range contains less than 20 percent of the state’s land base (Shevock 1996). -
Pollen Morphology of Erythronium L. (Liliaceae) and Its Systematic Relationships
J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 2(2)1833-1838, 2012 ISSN 2090-4304 Journal of Basic and Applied © 2012, TextRoad Publication Scientific Research www.textroad.com Pollen Morphology of Erythronium L. (Liliaceae) and its Systematic Relationships Sayed-Mohammad Masoumi Department of Plant Protection, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran ABSTRACT Pollen morphology of three genus of Erythronium was studied by the Light Microscopy (LM), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). Sulcus long reaching the ends of the grains, with operculum (E. giganteum, E. sibiricum) or without it (E. caucasicum). With surface latticed ornamentation and large lattice, thickness of muri and size of Lumina in E. sibiricum are widely varied. Also, most palynomorphological characteristics of the data transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed no strong differences between E. caucasicum and E. sibiricum, , but these species are well distinguished from E. giganteum according to ectexine thickness (thickness of the tectum and the foot layer), shape and diameter of the caput, height and width of the columella. KEY WORDS: Caput; Columella; Exine ornamentation; intine; Microrelief; Pollen grain; Tectum. INTRODUCTION Takhtajan, 1987 indicated that the genus of Erythronium in Tribe Tulipeae is of the Liliaceae family. Different sources have considered the species number of this genus varied from 24-30. Baranova (1999) introduced 24 species for this genus, of which 20 species were spread in North America. Allen et al. (2003) examined the genus of Erythronium, Amana, and Tulipa using the DNA sequences from the chloroplast gene matK and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Palynomorphological characters of 20 different pollen species of Erythronium were evaluated by different researchers (Ikuse, 1965; Beug (1963); Radulescu, 1973; Nakamura, 1980; Schulze, 1980; Kuprianova, 1983; Takahashi (1987); Kosenko, 1991b, 1992, 1996, 1999; Maassoumi, 2005a, 2005b, 2007). -
Terr–3 Special-Status Plant Populations
TERR–3 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT POPULATIONS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During 2001 and 2002, the review of existing information, agency consultation, vegetation community mapping, and focused special-status plant surveys were completed. Based on California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS) Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (CNPS 2001a), CDFG’s Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; CDFG 2003), USDA-FS Regional Forester’s List of Sensitive Plant and Animal Species for Region 5 (USDA-FS 1998), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Species List (USFWS 2003), and Sierra National Forest (SNF) Sensitive Plant List (Clines 2002), there were 100 special-status plant species initially identified as potentially occurring within the Study Area. Known occurrences of these species were mapped. Vegetation communities were evaluated to locate areas that could potentially support special-status plant species. Each community was determined to have the potential to support at least one special-status plant species. During the spring and summer of 2002, special-status plant surveys were conducted. For each special-status plant species or population identified, a CNDDB form was completed, and photographs were taken. The locations were mapped and incorporated into a confidential GIS database. Vascular plant species observed during surveys were recorded. No state or federally listed special-status plant species were identified during special- status plant surveys. Seven special-status plant species, totaling 60 populations, were identified during surveys. There were 22 populations of Mono Hot Springs evening-primrose (Camissonia sierrae ssp. alticola) identified. Two populations are located near Mammoth Pool, one at Bear Forebay, and the rest are in the Florence Lake area. -
TELOPEA Publication Date: 13 October 1983 Til
Volume 2(4): 425–452 TELOPEA Publication Date: 13 October 1983 Til. Ro)'al BOTANIC GARDENS dx.doi.org/10.7751/telopea19834408 Journal of Plant Systematics 6 DOPII(liPi Tmst plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/Telopea • escholarship.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/TEL· ISSN 0312-9764 (Print) • ISSN 2200-4025 (Online) Telopea 2(4): 425-452, Fig. 1 (1983) 425 CURRENT ANATOMICAL RESEARCH IN LILIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE AND IRIDACEAE* D.F. CUTLER AND MARY GREGORY (Accepted for publication 20.9.1982) ABSTRACT Cutler, D.F. and Gregory, Mary (Jodrell(Jodrel/ Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, England) 1983. Current anatomical research in Liliaceae, Amaryllidaceae and Iridaceae. Telopea 2(4): 425-452, Fig.1-An annotated bibliography is presented covering literature over the period 1968 to date. Recent research is described and areas of future work are discussed. INTRODUCTION In this article, the literature for the past twelve or so years is recorded on the anatomy of Liliaceae, AmarylIidaceae and Iridaceae and the smaller, related families, Alliaceae, Haemodoraceae, Hypoxidaceae, Ruscaceae, Smilacaceae and Trilliaceae. Subjects covered range from embryology, vegetative and floral anatomy to seed anatomy. A format is used in which references are arranged alphabetically, numbered and annotated, so that the reader can rapidly obtain an idea of the range and contents of papers on subjects of particular interest to him. The main research trends have been identified, classified, and check lists compiled for the major headings. Current systematic anatomy on the 'Anatomy of the Monocotyledons' series is reported. Comment is made on areas of research which might prove to be of future significance. -
A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests
A GUIDE TO Priority Plant and Animal Species IN OREGON FORESTS A publication of the Oregon Forest Resources Institute Sponsors of the first animal and plant guidebooks included the Oregon Department of Forestry, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Oregon State University and the Oregon State Implementation Committee, Sustainable Forestry Initiative. This update was made possible with help from the Northwest Habitat Institute, the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University and Oregon State University. Acknowledgments: The Oregon Forest Resources Institute is grateful to the following contributors: Thomas O’Neil, Kathleen O’Neil, Malcolm Anderson and Jamie McFadden, Northwest Habitat Institute; the Integrated Habitat and Biodiversity Information System (IBIS), supported in part by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council and the Bonneville Power Administration under project #2003-072-00 and ESRI Conservation Program grants; Sue Vrilakas, Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources; and Dana Sanchez, Oregon State University, Mark Gourley, Starker Forests and Mike Rochelle, Weyerhaeuser Company. Edited by: Fran Cafferata Coe, Cafferata Consulting, LLC. Designed by: Sarah Craig, Word Jones © Copyright 2012 A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests Oregonians care about forest-dwelling wildlife and plants. This revised and updated publication is designed to assist forest landowners, land managers, students and educators in understanding how forests provide habitat for different wildlife and plant species. Keeping forestland in forestry is a great way to mitigate habitat loss resulting from development, mining and other non-forest uses. Through the use of specific forestry techniques, landowners can maintain, enhance and even create habitat for birds, mammals and amphibians while still managing lands for timber production.