Thermal Control of a Light-Weight Rover System in the Permanently Shadowed Regions of the Lunar South Pole

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thermal Control of a Light-Weight Rover System in the Permanently Shadowed Regions of the Lunar South Pole ICES-2020-209 Thermal control of a light-weight rover system in the permanently shadowed regions of the lunar south pole D. Ivanov1 and D. Fernandes2 Ispace Europe, 5 Rue de l’Industrie, Luxembourg, L-1811 The exploration of the Earth’s Moon has become a topic of great interest in recent years to both private and governmental entities. ispace is aiming to be the enabler for private industry to access new business opportunities on the Moon by capitalizing on lunar resources and expanding our presence in space. The Polar Ice Explorer (PIE) is an in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) exploration mission that aims to find and characterise potential water ice deposits in the lunar polar regions. In the scope of this project, the rover thermal control system development will be discussed. PIE leverages on ispace developed and flight qualified Team HAKUTO’s SORATO rover. The paper explores findings from three key areas: operations in the permanently shadowed regions (PSR) of lunar poles, thermal control design of the rover system and modelling of lunar environment. Thermal modelling of the lunar polar region was conducted with a particular attention towards identification of surface properties, lunar regolith characteristics and modelling of environmental fluxes. Operational mission constraints, such as cooling rates and heater power requirements, were investigated. Thermal design philosophy aimed to maximise passive control means through decoupling of the rover from the ground, reduction of heat losses and conductive path management. Mechanical issues induced by larger temperature swings were investigated. Active control means were considered for elements with tighter operational ranges, such as batteries, motors and externally mounted elements. The rover thermal design challenges and preliminary findings enabling operations in the PSR were outlined. Nomenclature α = Solar absorptivity β = Infrared emissivity a = surface albedo MCp = System heat capacitance Cp = Specific Heat Capacity GR = radiative coupling GL = linear conductive coupling k = thermal conductivity dt = time step dT/dx = temperature gradient Fij = view factor from surface i to surface j Tsink = Sink temperature h = height g = gravitational acceleration SSM = Second Surface Mirror OSR = optical solar reflector 1 Thermal Engineer, Integrated Mechanical Systems Department, [email protected]. 2 Mechanical Engineer, Integrated Mechanical Systems Department, [email protected]. Copyright © 2020 ispace inc. I. Introduction The lunar environment, especially polar regions, is characterized by large surface temperature swings throughout each synodic day1 equal to 29.5 Earth days or 708 h. Typical non-illuminated portion of the lunar cycle lasts 354 h. Long night period creates a significant design challenge for surface operations. Surface exploration assets cannot rely solely on solar power to sustain themselves throughout the full lunar night. In addition, The South Pole contains rougher terrain and topographical features with significant heights which cast large shadows2 due to low elevation angle of the sun. Permanently shadowed regions (PSR) are particularly interesting areas for commercial exploration of the lunar surface as they contain trapped volatiles which can be extracted and converted into fuel to enable sustainable mission operations3. However, PSR temperatures as low as 50 to 70 K make it a very challenging thermal task. Thermal design of the polar rover presents several challenges4. Large swings in temperature cause materials to expand and contract thus creating stresses on mechanical assemblies and interfaces. Minimization of thermal strains requires careful selection of materials with low coefficient of thermal expansion. Operations in the PSR cause embrittlement issues due to reduction of ductility. On the other part of the spectrum, the lunar day may cause severe outgassing issues, which promote rapid degradation of lubricants and enhances abrasive effects of the lunar dust at seals. The lunar dust readily adheres to equipment and outer coatings 5. This not only causes mechanical failures of bearings, wheels and motors but also degraded performance of radiative coatings and reduced power generation of solar cells. These challenges coupled with a large power requirement to survive the lunar night significantly constrained thermal design of the polar rover. Several lunar landings and operations that lasted longer than one lunar day include Chang’e 4 and Lunokhod missions. Both utilised Radioistope thermoelectric generators (RTG) or Radioisotope heater units (RHU) to survive the lunar night6. On the opposite side, ESA’s Heracles EL3 mission and Blue Origin’s Lander are aiming to bring enough hydrogen and oxygen with them to allow rover or other payloads to take advantage of the regenerative fuel cell system7 and extend mission lifetime to more than 3 lunar cycles by supplying both heat and electricity throughout the non-illuminated portion of the lunar month. Both solutions have their advantages and disadvantages, but fuel cell based systems enable more commercial entities to be involved in the future lunar economy. Overall thermal design trend is to insulate and isolate critical components with tight operational ranges, as well as, add active thermal control solutions like heaters, pumped fluid loops and heat pipes to manage internal environment. Solar panels and RTGs were the two most preferred power sources for shorter and longer missions respectively. The following paper will dive deeper into the thermal design of the rover exploring non- RTG and non-RHU solutions to allow for a feasible commercial alternative. Figure 1: Rover overview Rover dimensions are 529 x 602 x 372 mm. Total mass of the rover is approximately 10.7 kg excluding the payload. All instruments were accommodated on the internal side of the platform with exception for stereo cameras and antennas. Key objectives of the mission are mapping of the lunar surface and prospecting the area for water ice deposits. Nominal rover mission is expected to last for 1 lunar day or 12 earth days assuming landing two days after sunrise, with no night survival capabilities. However, subsequent design upgrade would be done to improve mission duration and attempt night survival. Overall rover platform is designed to be compact, low mass and energy conservatives. Further chapters of this paper will describe the modelling of lunar environment, explore thermal hardware trade-offs and outline operational requirements for shadows. 2 International Conference on Environmental Systems II. Modelling of lunar thermal environment A. Mission thermal environment Thermal environment (Infra-red, albedo and solar flux) depends on the mission phase. The mission was therefore divided into several segments: Pre-launch, Leop, Earth Orbit, Transit, Landing and lunar surface operations. The lander ensures sustainable thermal environment compatibility of the rover up-until lunar surface operations phase. The exploration rover will rely on its own thermal control system while operating on the lunar surface. Therefore, key thermal drivers would be moon IR, solar flux at landing latitude and dissipation modes. The rover thermal design utilised a Solar Power Flux with an average value of 1367 W/m2 ± 3.5 %. In addition, ± 1% variation during 11 year solar cycle is also considered, with minimum value of 1321.6 W/m2 (Summer Solstice) and a maximum value of 1412.9 W/m2 (Winter Solstice)8. This environment is applicable at all times except when the Sun is blocked (i.e. during eclipse). Sink temperature to space was taken as 2.53K. However, this mainly applies to the top surface with radiators. Surfaces with a view factor to lunar ground used an adjusted sink temperature. Several important orbital parameters were included in order to accurately model the lunar environment. The lunar equatorial plane is inclined by 1.53o to the sun’s ecliptic plane and by 6.68 o to the orbital plane around the earth. The ecliptic plane is inclined by 5.15 o to the lunar orbital plane. In comparison, the earth is inclined by by 23.28 o to sun’s ecliptic plane. These parameters determine general motion and view conditions between the moon, the earth and the sun in the solar system9. Distance to sun was chosen to be 1 A.U, which is approximately true due to close vicinity to Earth. Figure 2: Mission thermal environment definition B. Topographical Elevation Topographical map of the moon, taken from the Kaguya and LRO data, shows a typical distribution of highlands, craters and mares on the surface. The sun elevation angle does not exceed 10 degrees at poles and would therefore cast large shadows when illuminating any boulder, crater rim or mountains. Identification of these key topographical features was critical in defining the mission trajectory and designing the thermal control system of the rover9. Further assessment of these features is shown in the next chapter. 3 International Conference on Environmental Systems Figure 3: Lunar topographical elevation a) global 2D map, b) global 3D map C. Solar Elevation Angle Solar elevation angle was investigated for a proposed landing site in the Amundsen Region. One full revolution with respect to stars (sidereal month) was taken as 27.32 Earth Days. The time between two new Moons (synodic month or lunation) was taken as 29.53 days. Longest solar day in 2023 was estimated to be 12 days, 1 hour, 10 minutes starting at 2023-01-25 00:12:27 (± 45 minutes). Solid red lines represent solar elevation angles
Recommended publications
  • An Evolved International Lunar Decade Global Exploration Roadmap
    Lunar Exploration Analysis Group (2015) 2016.pdf An Evolved International Lunar Decade Global Exploration Roadmap. David Dunlop. Author1 and Kim Hold- er. Author2, 1 National Space Society, 410 Ashland Ave, Green Bay Wisconsin, [email protected], 2 National Space Society (Patzcuaro, Michoacan, Mexico, Kim [email protected]). Introduction: Since 2007 an International 1 The 2013 GER edition did not reflect the Chinese Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) of 14 government lunar mission series beginning with the of the largest national space agencies has met to look at 2013 Chang’e III successful landing, and reflecting the potential of collaborative planning and coordina- Chang’e IV (now scheduled for 2020 targeting the tion of their national space exploration activities. lunar farside, Change’e V (sample return now sched- While these meetings have generally been closed door uled for 2017) with a Change’6 Mission indicated as a back-up to the sample return mission. (3) events a 2013 edition Global Exploration Roadmap 2 The GER did not reflect any of the Google Lunar X- (GER) was produced (signed off) by 12 of the 14 coun- Prize Missions. Several teams such as Astrobotic and tries reflecting their projected space program activities Moon-X and Team Space IL have received significant in the categories: Low Earth Orbit, Lunar Vicinity, financial support, have developed flight hardware, and Moon, Mars, Asteroids, and Transportation.(1) This while slipping behind the earlier 2015 deadline are GER is a formidable measure of collaborative efforts planning missions to the Moon perhaps succeeding in and spirits and a reflection of significant global coop- 2016 or when more affordable reusable launchers be- eration.
    [Show full text]
  • Gnc 2021 Abstract Book
    GNC 2021 ABSTRACT BOOK Contents GNC Posters ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Poster 01: A Software Defined Radio Galileo and GPS SW receiver for real-time on-board Navigation for space missions ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Poster 02: JUICE Navigation camera design .................................................................................................... 9 Poster 03: PRESENTATION AND PERFORMANCES OF MULTI-CONSTELLATION GNSS ORBITAL NAVIGATION LIBRARY BOLERO ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Poster 05: EROSS Project - GNC architecture design for autonomous robotic On-Orbit Servicing .............. 12 Poster 06: Performance assessment of a multispectral sensor for relative navigation ............................... 14 Poster 07: Validation of Astrix 1090A IMU for interplanetary and landing missions ................................... 16 Poster 08: High Performance Control System Architecture with an Output Regulation Theory-based Controller and Two-Stage Optimal Observer for the Fine Pointing of Large Scientific Satellites ................. 18 Poster 09: Development of High-Precision GPSR Applicable to GEO and GTO-to-GEO Transfer ................. 20 Poster 10: P4COM: ESA Pointing Error Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • ESA Strategy for Science at the Moon
    ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Releasable to the Public ESA Strategy for Science at the Moon ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Releasable to the Public EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A new era of space exploration is beginning, with multiple international and private sector actors engaged and with the Moon as its cornerstone. This renaissance in lunar exploration will offer new opportunities for science across a multitude of disciplines from planetary geology to astronomy and astrobiology whilst preparing the knowledge humanity will need to explore further into the Solar System. Recent missions and new analyses of samples retrieved during Apollo have transformed our understanding of the Moon and the science that can be performed there. We now understand the scientific importance of further exploration of the Moon to understand the origins and evolution of Earth and the cosmic context of life’s emergence on Earth and our future in space. ESA’s priorities for scientific activities at the Moon in the next ten years are: • Analysis of new and diverse samples from the Moon. • Detection and characterisation of polar water ice and other lunar volatiles. • Deployment of geophysical instruments and the build up a global geophysical network. • Identification and characterisation of potential resources for future exploration. • Deployment long wavelength radio astronomy receivers on the lunar far side. • Characterisation of the dynamic dust, charge and plasma environment. • Characterisation of biological sensitivity to the lunar environment. ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Releasable to the Public
    [Show full text]
  • ROBOTS for MOON EXPLORATION
    EGU21-11190 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11190 EGU General Assembly 2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. ROBOTS for MOON EXPLORATION Maxim Litvak, Igor Mitrofanov, Lev Zelenyi, Vladislav Tretyakov, Tatiana Kozlova, Maxim Mokrousov, Alexander Kozyrev, Artem Nosov, and Vladislav Yakovlev Space Research Institute, Laboratory, Moscow, Russian Federation ([email protected]) Russian lunar program includes several landing missions of Luna-25, Luna-27, Luna-28 which should be implemented step by step to explore mineralogical, chemical, and isotopic compositions of the lunar polar regolith, search for volatile compounds, deliver soil samples to the Earth and prepare future manned expeditions to Moon. The successful implementation of these missions requires employing of excavation and drilling of lunar regolith to the different depths with extraction of soil samples for the farther analysis (in situ or sample return).The first mission in row Luna-25 will be launched in October 2021 and landed at the area located north of Boguslawsky crater. This lander is equipped with the Lunar Manipulation Complex (LMC) – the robotic arm that should excavate lunar regolith (down to 5 – 25 cm) and deliver sample of lunar soil to the analytical instrumentation for the elemental and isotopic analysis. The robotic arm is already passed through the validation, functional and calibration tests in lunar-like conditions (low pressures and low temperatures) to imitate interaction with lunar soil simulant enriched with different content of water. The Luna – 27 and Luna – 28 will be landed at southern polar regions (landing site selection is in progress).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Exploration Roadmap
    The Global Exploration Roadmap January 2018 What is New in The Global Exploration Roadmap? This new edition of the Global Exploration robotic space exploration. Refinements in important role in sustainable human space Roadmap reaffirms the interest of 14 space this edition include: exploration. Initially, it supports human and agencies to expand human presence into the robotic lunar exploration in a manner which Solar System, with the surface of Mars as • A summary of the benefits stemming from creates opportunities for multiple sectors to a common driving goal. It reflects a coordi- space exploration. Numerous benefits will advance key goals. nated international effort to prepare for space come from this exciting endeavour. It is • The recognition of the growing private exploration missions beginning with the Inter- important that mission objectives reflect this sector interest in space exploration. national Space Station (ISS) and continuing priority when planning exploration missions. Interest from the private sector is already to the lunar vicinity, the lunar surface, then • The important role of science and knowl- transforming the future of low Earth orbit, on to Mars. The expanded group of agencies edge gain. Open interaction with the creating new opportunities as space agen- demonstrates the growing interest in space international science community helped cies look to expand human presence into exploration and the importance of coopera- identify specific scientific opportunities the Solar System. Growing capability and tion to realise individual and common goals created by the presence of humans and interest from the private sector indicate and objectives. their infrastructure as they explore the Solar a future for collaboration not only among System.
    [Show full text]
  • Options for Staging Orbits in Cislunar Space
    Options for Staging Orbits in Cislunar Space Ryan Whitley Roland Martinez NASA IEEE Aerospace Conference March 2016 Introduction Earth Access Lunar Surface Long Term Ops Summary Need for Staging Orbit 2 / 14 Introduction Earth Access Lunar Surface Long Term Ops Summary Hub for International Exploration ISECG&Mission&Scenario& 2020 2030 Low-Earth Orbit International Space Station Robotic Mission Commercial or Government-Owned Platforms Human Mission Beyond Low-Earth Orbit Cargo Mission Test Missions Asteroid Redirection Rosetta Hayabusa-2 OSIRIS-REx (Sample Return) (Sample Return) Explore Near Earth Asteroid Near-Earth Objects Apophis Extended Staging Post for Crew Duration to Lunar Surface Lunar Vicinity Crew Missions Potential Commercial Opportunities LADEE Luna 25 Luna 26 Luna 27 RESOLVE SELENE-2 Luna 28/29 SELENE-3 Human-Assisted (Sample Sample Return Humans to Lunar Surface Chandrayaan-2 Return) Moon Potential Commercial Opportunities Human-Assisted Sample Return Sustainable Human MAVEN ISRO Mars ExoMars InSight ExoMars Mars JAXA Mars Sample Return Mission Missions to the Orbiter Mission 2016 2018 2020 Mars Opportunities Mars System Mars Precursor Human Scale EDL Test Mission Opportunities Multi-Destination Small Human Transportation Cargo Surface Capabilities Initial Lander Mobility (Planned and Conceptual) Cargo Delivery Evolvable Orion Russian Advanced Deep Space Orion Orion & Icon indicates first use opportunity. & Piloted Electric & SLS Crewed SLS Commercial/Institutional launchers not shown. Habitat SLS Propulsion (Upgrade) Lunar
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Science Update
    Planetary Science Division Status Report Jim Green NASA, Planetary Science Division October 11, 2017 Presentation at LEAG Planetary Science Missions Events 2016 March – Launch of ESA’s ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter July 4 – Juno inserted in Jupiter orbit * Completed September 8 – Launch of Asteroid mission OSIRIS – REx to asteroid Bennu September 30 – Landing Rosetta on comet CG October 19 – ExoMars EDM landing and TGO orbit insertion 2017 January 4 – Discovery Mission selection announced February 9-20 - OSIRIS-REx began Earth-Trojan search April 22 – Cassini begins plane change maneuver for the “Grand Finale” August 22 – Solar Eclipse across America September 15 – Cassini end of mission at Saturn September 22 – OSIRIS-REx Earth flyby October 28 – International Observe the Moon night (1st quarter) 2018 May 5 - Launch InSight mission to Mars August – OSIRIS-REx arrival at Bennu October – Launch of ESA’s BepiColombo to Mercury November 26 – InSight landing on Mars 2019 January 1 – New Horizons flyby of Kuiper Belt object 2014MU69 Formulation Implementation Primary Ops BepiColombo Lunar Extended Ops (ESA) Reconnaissance Orbiter Lucy New Horizons Psyche Juno Dawn JUICE (ESA) ExoMars 2016 MMX MAVEN MRO (ESA) (JAXA) Mars Express Mars (ESA) Odyssey OSIRIS-REx ExoMars 2020 (ESA) Mars Rover Opportunity Curiosity InSight 2020 Rover Rover NEOWISE Europa Clipper Discovery Program Discovery Program NEO characteristics: Mars evolution: Lunar formation: Nature of dust/coma: Solar wind sampling: NEAR (1996-1999) Mars Pathfinder (1996-1997) Lunar Prospector
    [Show full text]
  • O Brasil No Espaço
    Uma publicação do Colégio Dante Alighieri Ano VIII - No 7 - Setembro de 2018 O Brasil no espaço Educação • Por um ensino mais Para Lucas Fonseca, efetivo e democrático engenheiro espacial, o Meio Ambiente & Sustentabilidade segredo para grandes • Transformando conchas em argamassa missões é inspirar pessoas, • Um projeto em prol da Caatinga independentemente da faixa etária • Saúde • Combatendo a anemia e a desnutrição infantil • Um aliado na luta contra os mosquitos • Um cimento ósseo feito de resíduos sólidos Meio Ambiente & Sustentabilidade • Transformando conchas em argamassa • Um projeto em prol da Caatinga Tecnologia • Inclusão e mobilidade para deficientes visuais • Uma enfermeira eletrônica Presidente: Dr. José Luiz Farina Diretora-Geral Pedagógica: Profª. Silvana Leporace Comitê Científico: Profª. Dra. Sandra Rudella Tonidandel Profª. Dra. Valdenice M. M. de Cerqueira Prof°. Tiago Bodê + (Expediente) Jornalista Responsável: Comitê Editorial Fernando Homem de Montes a MTB 34598 Profª. Dr . Sandra Rudella Tonidandel Profª. Dra. Valdenice M. M. de Cerqueira Fernando Homem de Montes Marcella Chartier Edição e textos: Marcella Chartier Projeto Gráfico: Nelson Doy Júnior Desenvolvimento do Logotipo: Revisão: Thiago Xavier Mansilla Maldonado Camilla de Rezende Revisão Científica: Prof°. Tiago Bodê Diagramação: Simone Alves Machado Contato: Envie suas críticas e Créditos Finais: Uma publicação sugestões para o e-mail: Todas as fotos, informações e depoimentos [email protected] cedidos por terceiros para publicação nesta revista
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Moon Exploration Program Russian Moon Exploration
    25/09/2014 Press Center, Space Research Institute (IKI) Russian Academy of Sciences Russian Moon exploration program Russian Moon exploration program currently consists of three successive missions, using the legacy of earlier Soviet lunar missions, which included orbiters and landers, sample returns and rovers. The last in the row of Soviet missions was Luna 24 (“Luna” is Russian for “Moon”) sample return mission in 1976. New missions, unlike their predecessors, are targeted at lunar poles, which were poorly explored during early lunar programs in 1960's and 1970's. However, recent discoveries made by NASA's Clementine, Lunar Prospector, and most recent Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter gave strong evidence in support of various lunar volatiles, and above all, water ice, in lunar regolith near poles. Roscosmos has contributed important scientific results in these studies with Russian-contributed neutron telescope LEND [ССЫЛКА http://l503.iki.rssi.ru/LEND-en.html] onboard the LRO spacecraft. This may indicate more diverse and dynamic environment on the Moon, than assumed. Moreover, such volatiles may be used later as possible sources for lunar base. Currently Russian Moon missions are as follows: ▪ Luna-25 (also known as Luna-Glob-Lander) mission to land the spacecraft on the Moon and the first in a row of a new lunar program, which should eventually lead to exploitation of the Moon. The spacecraft should land in the vicinity of lunar South pole and analyse lunar regolith samples in-situ. Launch planned for 2018. ▪ Luna-26 (or Luna-Resurs-Orbiter) orbital mission to study Moon from low polar orbit (approximately 50–100 km).
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Space Science Programme Update
    RUSSIAN SPACE SCIENCE PROGRAMME update for ESSF 55th ESSC meeting Geneva 23 May Presented by Oleg Korablev, Space Research Institute, IKI [email protected] Academy update • Fall 2017: the election of the new President of the Academy, Acad Alexander Sergeev – 1st Vice-president Acad Yuri Balega • Space Science is coordinated by the Space Council of the Academy • Alexander Sergeev chairing the Space Council – Deputy chair Acad Lev Zelenyi • FASO – Federal Agency of Science Organizations was in charge of Academy institutes since 2015 – With the new Government in 2018 FASO is replaced by Ministry of Science and Education (high education) – The Minister is Mikhail Kotyukov (head of FASO) Roscosmos update • In 2015 Roscosmos has become “State Corporation” (Federal Space Agency before) • The head is Igor Komarov – The deputy responsible for space science is Mikhail Khailov – New Government in place in May 2018 • Federal Space Programme in its “Fundamental” (i.e. science part) – Multiple budget cuts since 2015 (2017 and 2018 affected in particular) – Many missions delayed (appr. two years) – Candidate prospective missions (introduced by the Space Council in 2014-2015) disappeared from the programme – FSP 2016-2025 still being revised (now submitted to the Government) CURRENT RESEARCH In course Mars Odyssey (HEND) 2001 INTEGRAL (launch, 25% time) 2002 Mars Express (3 instruments) 2003 LRO (LEND) 2009 Curiosity (DAN) 2011 RADIOASTRON 2011 The most recent Lomonosov (Moscow University) 2016 ExoMars TGO comm. started Mar 2016 Upcoming Bepi Colombo
    [Show full text]
  • Luna 27:RUSSIAN Remote LUNAR Observation EXPLORATION of Hydrogenmissions Subsurface (Down to 0.5 M) Distribution with Active Neutron and Gamma Spectrometers
    RUSSIAN LUNAR EXPLORATION MISSIONS The vision of the Russian Space Agency on the robotic settlements in the Moon Maxim Litvak Space Research Institute Russian Academy of sciences page 1 RUSSIAN LUNAR EXPLORATION MISSIONS History/Heritage Zond-3 photos of far side of the Moon Luna-9 Luna-16 with Lunokhod-1 first landing samples of regolith page 2 RUSSIAN LUNAR EXPLORATION MISSIONS Main principles of Lunar Program page 3 RUSSIAN LUNAR EXPLORATION MISSIONS 1. Lunar program shall include initial exploration/investigation stage to solve key, most important lunar tasks and to provide basis for following human exploration and utilization of lunar resources. 2. Lunar program shall be developed as a sequence of key projects/missions with increasing complexity where subsequent missions inherit and develop science results and technologies achieved in previous missions and projects. 3. Lunar program goals shall take into account current technology readiness level (including technologies developed by Soviet lunar program and other space agencies) and available funding resources. 4. Lunar Program shall start with robotic missions and continue with manned lunar missions, solving specific tasks at each stage to effectively approach strategic goal – human exploration of the Moon and creating long living lunar bases. 5. Lunar Program (primary goals) shall be based on national funding capabilities but allow and provides possibilities for close involvement of international cooperation. page 4 RUSSIAN LUNAR EXPLORATION MISSIONS Main goals of Lunar Program page 5 RUSSIAN LUNAR EXPLORATION MISSIONS 1. NEW MOON SCIENCE . Origin and evolution . Polar regions and volatiles . Lunar exosphere and radiation environment. 2. NEW LUNAR TRANSPORT CAPABILITIES . To support robotic and human missions to lunar orbit and lunar surface.
    [Show full text]
  • ESA's Plans for Lunar Exploration
    ESA’s plans for Lunar Exploration On behalf of the ESA Lunar Exploration Team Directorate of Human Spaceflight and Operations ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use ESA’s Exploration Destinations ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Destination Moon ESA Vision for Lunar Exploration: “Provide access to the Moon’s surface to drive European discovery, innovation and inspiration.” ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Human Transportation ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Core European Products and Services PILOT 1. Characterise Landing Sites landing sites Analyses 2. Access Relative Hazard landing sites precisely & Absolute Detection and safely Navigation PROSPECT Prepare 3. Acquire samples of future interest for exploration Lunar Drill missions Volatile 4. Analyse samples Extraction & Analysis processing SPECTRUM 5. Communicate & Ground UHF Operate Support Proximity Link ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Access the surface PRECISELY SAFELY ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use PILOT ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use PILOT for Precise and Safe Landing Key development challenges ● Design for autonomy and reliability ● Real-time Software and IP Core development for highly computationally demanding applications (e.g. Image Processing) on space-grade processors and FPGA/ASIC ● Development of dedicated Processing Unit ● Development of high performance sensors (LIDAR and Camera) ● Integration of highly complex units and LPU functions LIDAR Camera ● Integration onto platform, with on-board computer and into mission
    [Show full text]