DOCSLIB.ORG

Historical Lessons Applied to the Current Technical Revolution in Military Affairs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historical Lessons Applied to the Current Technical Revolution in Military Affairs No. 87 MARCH 2012 Historical Lessons Applied to the Current Technical Revolution in Military Affairs Benjamin Huebschman Historical Lessons Applied to the Current Technical Revolution in Military Affairs by Benjamin Huebschman The Institute of Land Warfare ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY AN INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE PAPER The purpose of the Institute of Land Warfare is to extend the educational work of AUSA by sponsoring scholarly publications, to include books, monographs and essays on key defense issues, as well as workshops and symposia. A work selected for publication as a Land Warfare Paper represents research by the author which, in the opinion of ILW’s editorial board, will contribute to a better understanding of a particular defense or national security issue. Publication as an Institute of Land Warfare Paper does not indicate that the Association of the United States Army agrees with everything in the paper but does suggest that the Association believes the paper will stimulate the thinking of AUSA members and others concerned about important defense issues. LAND WARFARE PAPER NO. 87, March 2012 Historical Lessons Applied to the Current Technical Revolution in Military Affairs by Benjamin Huebschman Major Benjamin D. Huebschman, U.S. Army Reserve, is a research engineer with an exten- sive military background in Field Artillery, Military Intelligence and Psychological Operations. He is currently serving on active duty at the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command as the Chief of Operations for the Futures Directorate. Prior to this assignment, he was an electronics engineer at the U.S. Army Research Laboratory, where he authored several peer- reviewed scientific and engineering articles. His military career has seen deployments in the Balkan Peninsula, where he served in a peacekeeping role. He also deployed to the Middle East where he served as the chief psychological operations officer to the U.S. Central Command Air Forces during the invasion of Iraq. MAJ Huebschman received a Bachelor’s Degree in electri- cal engineering from Purdue University and a Master’s Degree and Ph.D., also in electrical engineering, from the University of Maryland. This paper represents the opinions of the author and should not be taken to represent the views of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, the United States government, the Institute of Land Warfare, or the Association of the United States Army or its members. © Copyright 2012 by The Association of the United States Army All rights reserved. Inquiries regarding this and future Land Warfare Papers should be directed to: AUSA’s Institute of Land Warfare, Attn: Director, ILW Programs, 2425 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington VA 22201, e-mail [email protected] or telephone (direct dial) 703-907- 2627 or (toll free) 1-800-336-4570, ext. 2627. ii Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................. v Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 Case study 1: Fires .................................................................................................................. 4 Case study 2: Maneuver ........................................................................................................ 12 Case study 3: Weapons of Mass Destruction ......................................................................... 15 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 21 Endnotes ................................................................................................................................ 23 iii iv Foreword American battlefield supremacy has forced the adversary to adopt an asymmetric ap- proach to warfare. Capital-intensive warfare has focused on the larger weapon systems, but the weapons used to equip the dismounted ground Soldier have remained largely static— despite ten years of war against insurgents who have relied on the asymmetric fight. To combat this threat, the Army is in need of technology that can transfer battlefield supremacy down to the level of the individual ground Soldier. In this paper, the author explains that hastening the integration of automation technologies with military equipment provides un- precedented degrees of freedom in system development. The development of future weapon systems, including those used by the dismounted Soldier, benefits from a review of the evolution of weapons. With that in mind, the author presents the key stages in the development of weapon systems as case studies, examining each stage with sufficient detail and in its historical context. Each case study provides lessons that can then be applied to modern weapon development. The author’s analysis of these case studies leads him to propose an instantiation of a modern system with regard to Battlefield Operating Systems. Gordon R. Sullivan General, U.S. Army Retired President, Association of the United States Army 14 March 2012 v vi Historical Lessons Applied to the Current Technical Revolution in Military Affairs Introduction Army and Marine Corps platoons and squads have borne the wars’ burdens in Iraq and Afghanistan. Sandra I. Erwin1 Despite the persistent counterinsurgency that the United States has been waging for the past decade, the technology available to American ground Soldiers is remarkably similar to the technology that was available to them at the beginning of the conflict. The military stands on the edge of the next revolution in military affairs. Advances in automation and information technol- ogies have dramatically transformed many aspects of civilian society in the past 20 years. When compared to this frenzy of technological development, especially in consumer electronics, these advances have entered military technology at a deliberate and gradual pace. Western warfare in general and American warfare specifically have always been capital- intensive endeavors. Major capital systems such as air-superiority fighter aircraft and main battle tanks have established a degree of supremacy in technological improvement. This su- premacy in weapons traditionally has been considered to be of strategic significance to U.S. interests. However, given the strategic nature of American casualties in recent conflicts, a major upgrade in the military capabilities of dismounted Soldiers is critical to U.S. strategy in the protracted counterinsurgency fight. While the United States may want its adversaries to attempt to counter U.S. asymmetric superiority in technology and training with a symmetric response, once American superiority becomes manifestly and painfully obvious to the enemy, it is reasonable to assume that he will resort to asymmetric tactics and technology to accom- plish his objectives. Part of the response to an asymmetric threat is to oppose violently the asymmetric warrior. Denying insurgents the ability to act directly erodes their resource base and credibility as an ef- fective fighting force. The enemy may not be as sensitive as the American populace to its number of casualties, but after a certain level of enemy casualties is reached, support for direct attacks against U.S. Soldiers begins to collapse, prompting the adoption of other tactics or a waning of the insurgency. While a comprehensive counterinsurgency strategy has been discussed at length in other documents,2 it is beyond the scope of this paper. Here, counterinsurgency 1 strategy will be confined to the assertion that one of the requirements to defeat an insurgency is to do so on the battlefield, taking advantage of every opportunity. To seize and maintain the initiative in an asymmetric conflict is difficult and sometimes impossible. Without the initia- tive, it is necessary—at least on occasion—to let the enemy set the operational tempo. Mass can be achieved through the use of increased numbers of dismounted Soldiers. However, it is often prohibitively expensive for a sustained effort, and a concentration of Soldiers is vulner- able to area-effect weapons such as mortar fire and prepositioned explosives. A concerted effort is required to provide battlefield dominance to the infantry Soldier through the same quality of technical superiority that has led to dominance in air and armored combat. To improve technologies available to Soldiers, it is first necessary to understand the current state of the art. As a testament to the maturity of firearms, the weapons with which the United States equips its Soldiers are only marginally superior to those used 100 years earlier. Among some Afghan tribes, the Enfield .303 enjoys a reputation superior to that of the AK-47;3 Soldiers who stormed up San Juan Hill in 1898 carried rifles whose range and muzzle velocity were comparable to those of weapons carried by Soldiers today. That said, U.S. Soldiers have the advantage over their predecessors in training, communications and the ability to bring the fires of more sophisticated weapon systems down on their adversaries. Direct capital expenditure on the improvement of dismounted infantry Soldier performance and capabilities has relied until very recent times on increased training. While superior training can dramatically increase the battlefield effectiveness of a Soldier, it does not bring the same decisive psychological advantage as a heavy weapon system. The will and ability to consistently hit
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sounds of War and Peace: Soundscapes of European Cities in 1945
    10 This book vividly evokes for the reader the sound world of a number of Eu- Renata Tańczuk / Sławomir Wieczorek (eds.) ropean cities in the last year of the Second World War. It allows the reader to “hear” elements of the soundscapes of Amsterdam, Dortmund, Lwów/Lviv, Warsaw and Breslau/Wrocław that are bound up with the traumatising experi- ences of violence, threats and death. Exploiting to the full methodologies and research tools developed in the fields of sound and soundscape studies, the Sounds of War and Peace authors analyse their reflections on autobiographical texts and art. The studies demonstrate the role urban sounds played in the inhabitants’ forging a sense of 1945 Soundscapes of European Cities in 1945 identity as they adapted to new living conditions. The chapters also shed light on the ideological forces at work in the creation of urban sound space. Sounds of War and Peace. War Sounds of Soundscapes of European Cities in Volume 10 Eastern European Studies in Musicology Edited by Maciej Gołąb Renata Tańczuk is a professor of Cultural Studies at the University of Wrocław, Poland. Sławomir Wieczorek is a faculty member of the Institute of Musicology at the University of Wrocław, Poland. Renata Tańczuk / Sławomir Wieczorek (eds.) · Wieczorek / Sławomir Tańczuk Renata ISBN 978-3-631-75336-1 EESM 10_275336_Wieczorek_SG_A5HC globalL.indd 1 16.04.18 14:11 10 This book vividly evokes for the reader the sound world of a number of Eu- Renata Tańczuk / Sławomir Wieczorek (eds.) ropean cities in the last year of the Second World War. It allows the reader to “hear” elements of the soundscapes of Amsterdam, Dortmund, Lwów/Lviv, Warsaw and Breslau/Wrocław that are bound up with the traumatising experi- ences of violence, threats and death.
    [Show full text]
  • 16Th Infantry Division 47Th Field Artillery Camp Kearny, California Private John Leslie Banner
    16th Infantry Division 47th Field Artillery Camp Kearny, California Private John Leslie Banner John Leslie Banner, a son of Samuel Banner and Ellen Radford Banner, was born on November 5, 1896 in Upton, Utah. He was the tenth of eleven children in the family of seven girls and four boys. He entered the army on September 3, 1918 and was assigned to Camp Kearny, California where he was training in the field artillery. While training, he became ill with influenza and developed pneumonia. The military contacted his Mother and she traveled to Camp Kearny to be at his side when he died. Just before he died, he told his mother, “Tell the folks not to feel bad. I am one out of thousands”. He died on December 6, 1918. A military funeral was held at Camp Kearny before his body was shipped home. Funeral services were held at the Coalville, Utah cemetery and he was buried there. At the time of his death, he was survived by his parents, four sisters and two brothers: Mary Ellen, Elizabeth Ann, Lydia, Cora Leone, Samuel, and William Henry. He was preceded in death by three sisters and one brother: Frances Alice, Lydia May, Mabel, and Benjamin. During World War I, the 16th Division was renamed the 37th Infantry Division. The formation of another division designated as the 16th Division occurred in 1918 and was stationed at Camp Kearny, California. It never went overseas and it was one of several divisions in WWI that did not select an insignia. The Army has not designated a new division as the 16th since it was demobilized in March 1919..
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in International Arms Transfers, 2020 3
    SIPRI Fact Sheet March 2021 TRENDS IN INTERNATIONAL KEY FACTS w The volume of international ARMS TRANSFERS, 2020 transfers of major arms in 2016–20 was 0.5 per cent lower than in 2011–15 and 12 per cent pieter d. wezeman, alexandra kuimova and higher than in 2006–10. siemon t. wezeman w The five largest arms exporters in 2016–20 were the The volume of international transfers of major arms in 2016–20 was United States, Russia, France, 0.5 per cent lower than in 2011–15 and 12 per cent higher than in 2006–10 Germany and China. Together, they accounted for 76 per cent of (see figure 1).1 The five largest arms exporters in 2016–20 were the United all exports of major arms in States, Russia, France, Germany and China (see table 1). The five largest 2016–20. arms importers were Saudi Arabia, India, Egypt, Australia and China w In 2016–20 US arms exports (see table 2). Between 2011–15 and 2016–20 there were increases in arms accounted for 37 per cent of the transfers to the Middle East (25 per cent) and to Europe (12 per cent), while global total and were 15 per cent there were decreases in the transfers to Africa (–13 per cent), the Americas higher than in 2011–15. (–43 per cent), and Asia and Oceania (–8.3 per cent). w Russian arms exports From 15 March 2021 SIPRI’s open-access Arms Transfers Database decreased by 22 per cent includes updated data on transfers of major arms for 1950–2020, which between 2011–15 and 2016–20.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee State Library and Archives WASHINGTON FAMILY PAPERS
    State of Tennessee Department of State Tennessee State Library and Archives 403 Seventh Avenue North Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0312 WASHINGTON FAMILY PAPERS, 1796-1962 Processed by Harry A. Stokes Accession numbers: 83-001; 84-001; 89-131 Microfilm accession number: Mf. 961 Dates completed: Jan. 24, 1983; Mar. 16, 1984 Locations: XVII-F-K-1; VI-C-1v; oversize flat storage - top of map cases The Washington Family Papers, 1796-1962, are centered around “Wessyngton,” the Washington family home built in 1818 by Joseph Washington, tobacco planter, near Cedar Hill in Robertson County, Tennessee. The papers contain records of the plantation as well as the correspondence of four generations: Joseph Washington (1770-1848), tobacco planter; George Augustine Washington (1815-1892), tobacco planter, railroad executive, and capitalist; Joseph Edwin Washington (1851-1915), Congressman and tobacco farmer; and George Augustine Washington (1879- 1964), attorney, tobacco farmer, and genealogist. The papers were gifts of Mrs. Mary Kinsolving, Baltimore, Md.; Hickman Price, Jr., Palm Beach, Fla.; and Mrs. Anne K. Talbott, Cookeville, Tenn. Linear feet of shelf space occupied: 64 Approximate number of items: ca. 11,200 Single photocopies of unpublished writings in the Washington Family Papers may be made for purposes of scholarly research. WASHINGTON FAMILY PAPERS , 1796-1962 7/if. 91/ Microf1lm Container List Reel No . : 1. Box 1, folder 1 to Box 2, folder 10 2. Box 2, folder 11 to Box 5 , folder 9 3. Box 5, folder 10 to Box 8 , folder 8 4. Box 8. folder 9 to Box 10, folder 16 5. Box 10, folder 17 to Box 13, folder 18 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars As Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 6-1965 The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars as Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War Charles John Goodall Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Goodall, Charles John, "The Utilization of Artillery and Mortars as Infantry Support Weapons in the Chaco War" (1965). Master's Theses. 3907. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3907 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UTILIZATION OF ARTILLERY AND MORTARS AS INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS IN THE CHACO WAR by Charles John Goodall A thesis presented to the Faculty of the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Arts Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June, 1965 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation for the co-operation of the following agencies and research facilities in gathering materials and providing technical advice in the production of this thesis: The University of Texas Library, Austin, Texas. The University of North Carolina Library, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The University of Florida Library, Gainesville, Florida. Duke University Library, Durham, North Carolina. The University of California Library, Los Angeles, California The United States Army War College, Ft. Leavenworth, Kansas. The United States Army Ordnance School, Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Dominant Land Forces for 21St Century Warfare
    No. 73 SEPTEMBER 2009 Dominant Land Forces for 21st Century Warfare Edmund J. Degen A National Security Affairs aperP published on occasion by THE INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY Arlington, Virginia Dominant Land Forces for 21st Century Warfare by Edmund J. Degen The Institute of Land Warfare ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY AN INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE PAPER The purpose of the Institute of Land Warfare is to extend the educational work of AUSA by sponsoring scholarly publications, to include books, monographs and essays on key defense issues, as well as workshops and symposia. A work selected for publication as a Land Warfare Paper represents research by the author which, in the opinion of ILW’s editorial board, will contribute to a better understanding of a particular defense or national security issue. Publication as an Institute of Land Warfare Paper does not indicate that the Association of the United States Army agrees with everything in the paper, but does suggest that the Association believes the paper will stimulate the thinking of AUSA members and others concerned about important defense issues. LAND WARFARE PAPER NO. 73, September 2009 Dominant Land Forces for 21st Century Warfare by Edmund J. Degen Colonel Edmund J. Degen recently completed the senior service college at the Joint Forces Staff College and moved to the Republic of Korea, where he served as the U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) J35, Chief of Future Operations. He is presently the Commander of the 3d Battlefield Coordination Detachment–Korea. He previously served as Special Assistant to General William S.
    [Show full text]
  • Heroics & Ros Index
    MBW - ARMOURED RAIL CAR Page 6 Error! Reference source not found. Page 3 HEROICS & ROS WINTER 2009 CATALOGUE Napoleonic American Civil War Page 11 Page 12 INDEX Land , Naval & Aerial Wargames Rules 1 Books 1 Trafalgar 1/300 transfers 1 HEROICS & ROS 1/300TH SCALE W.W.1 Aircraft 1 W.W.1 Figures and Vehicles 4 W.W.2 Aircraft 2 W.W.2. Tanks &Figures 4 W.W.2 Trains 6 Attack & Landing Craft 6 SAMURAI Page11 Modern Aircraft 3 Modern Tanks & Figures 7 NEW KINGDOM EGYPTIANS, Napoleonic, Ancient Figures 11 HITTITES AND Dark Ages, Medieval, Wars of the Roses, SEA PEOPLES Renaissance, Samurai, Marlburian, Page 11 English Civil War, Seven Years War, A.C.W, Franco-Prussian War and Colonial Figures 12 th Revo 1/300 full colour Flags 12 VIJAYANTA MBT Page 7 SWA103 SAAB J 21 Page 4 World War 2 Page 4 PRICE Mk 1 MOTHER Page 4 £1.00 Heroics and Ros 3, CASTLE WAY, FELTHAM, MIDDLESEX TW13 7NW www.heroicsandros.co.uk Welcome to the new home of Heroics and Ros models. Over the next few weeks we will be aiming to consolidate our position using the familiar listings and web site. However, during 2010 we will be bringing forward some exciting new developments both in the form of our web site and a modest expansion in our range of 1/300 scale vehicles. For those wargamers who have in the past purchased their Heroics and Ros models along with their Navwar 1/300 ships, and Naismith and Roundway 15mm figures, these ranges are of course still available direct from Navwar www.navwar.co.uk as before, though they will no longer be carrying the Heroics range.
    [Show full text]
  • English Reactions to the Franco-Prussian War Andrew Mcginnis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Honors Program Theses and Projects Undergraduate Honors Program 12-17-2015 A Snapshot in Time: English Reactions to the Franco-Prussian War Andrew McGinnis Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation McGinnis, Andrew. (2015). A Snapshot in Time: English Reactions to the Franco-Prussian War. In BSU Honors Program Theses and Projects. Item 125. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj/125 Copyright © 2015 Andrew McGinnis This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. A Snapshot in Time: English Reactions to the Franco-Prussian War Andrew McGinnis Submitted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for Commonwealth Honors in History Bridgewater State University December 17, 2015 Dr. Leonid Heretz, Thesis Director Dr. Thomas Nester, Committee Member Dr. Sarah Wiggins, Committee Member A Snapshot in Time: English Reactions to the Franco-Prussian War Andrew McGinnis 13 December 2015 2 The decade culminating in 1871 was filled with turmoil and forceful politics that united Germany under Prussian control. The major event that completed this process was the Franco- Prussian War of 1870-1871. This war led to a change in the status quo. It both weakened France’s power and strengthened the legitimacy of a unified Germany under Prussia. In the 19th Century, Great Britain was the dominant country in European power politics.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Title Fonts
    TITLE FONTS “Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes Quotes.” - Quoted Person Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla sollicitudin mi sed pulvinar ornare. Aliquam mollis enim eu fermentum consequat. Quisque metus augue, tristique sit amet tortor eget, accumsan placerat orci. Donec non fringilla turpis, nec congue enim. # Result # Result # Result 11 31 51 12 32 52 13 33 53 14 34 54 15 35 55 16 36 56 21 41 61 22 42 62 23 43 63 24 44 64 25 45 65 26 46 66 1 Matt Russell (order #9597485) Not One Step Back Comrades Matt Russell (order #9597485) The Directorate of the Armoured Forces of the Red Army HELL ON TREADS T34 Tank SERVICE MANUAL and D66 Tables Moscow 1942 Peoples Technical Writer DEREK CHAPPELL EDITing Commisar JOE MCNEIL Matt Russell (order #9597485) Table of Contents Allied Tanks 4-5 Axis Tanks 6-7 Crew Generator 8 Crew Twist Generator 9 Standard Feature Generator 10 Strange Feature Generator 11 Mission Generator 12-13 Obstacle Generator 14 Complication Generator 15 2 Matt Russell (order #9597485) Introduction The d66 Table is a random generation table, crewed by two brave six- sided die and ready to serve the Motherland! Using these tables, much stress can be avoided by tank crews, as these clever systems, designed by top Soviet Roleplaying Engineers beyond the Ural Mountains, allow the automation of previously difficult choices which could paralyze a man with indecision! The Operation of the d66 Table is simple, and will pose no great challenge to the clever Soviet crewman.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline - May 1940
    TIMELINE - MAY 1940 As the month begins the battle for Norway continues. Just to recap, German naval and ground forces had begun invading both Norway and Denmark on 9th April. Denmark had quickly capitulated but Norway had resisted. British forces were sent to Andalsnes on 18th April to 1st May, Namsos on 16th April to 3rd May, and Narvik from 15th April to 8th June. They were joined by Norwegian, French and Polish forces. But as May begins the evacuation of Allied troops from some of these areas is already underway and nearing completion. With the failure of the campaign for central Norway attention shifts to Narvik in the far north, strategically vital to the Germans for the shipping of iron ore from Sweden. 1 On 2nd May German troops reached Andalsnes, and on the following day Norwegian troops south of Trondheim surrendered to the Germans. The allied evacuation at Namsos was completed, but German aircraft located part of the evacuation fleet and sank the destroyers Afridi and Bison. The Bison was a French destroyer and she was the first to be sunk with the loss of 136 of her crew. The surviving crew were then picked up by the Afridi. But when that ship came under attack a further 35 of her crew were lost, along with 53 of the Afridi’s crew and 13 soldiers - the only casualties among the whole force of 12,000 troops evacuated from Åndalsnes and Namsos On 5th May the Battle of Hegra Fortress ended when the fortress capitulated. The Germans had now achieved complete victory on Norway’s southern front.
    [Show full text]
  • Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War Andrew Loren Jones East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2014 Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War Andrew Loren Jones East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Andrew Loren, "Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2387. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2387 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War ___________________________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ________________________________________ by Andrew L. Jones May 2014 ________________________________________ Dr. Stephen G. Fritz, Chair Dr. Dinah Mayo-Bobee Dr. John M. Rankin Keywords: Nationalism, Delbrück, Schlieffen, German War Planning, Germany, Sedan, Moltke, War Enthusiasm, German Wars of Unification, World War I ABSTRACT Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War by Andrew L. Jones Debating Cannae: Delbrück, Schlieffen, and the Great War provides the reader a view of the historical struggle between Alfred von Schlieffen and Hans Delbrück. They argued fiercely about the foundation of the German Empire and the use of history.
    [Show full text]
  • World War I Battlefield Artillery Tactics
    World War I Battlefield Artillery Tactics DALE CLARKE ILLUSTRATED BY PETER DENNIS © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com &MJUFt World War I Battlefield Artillery Tactics DALE CLARKE ILLUSTRATED BY PETER DENNIS Series editor Martin Windrow © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 5IFCJSUIPGUIFAEFFQCBUUMF EQUIPMENT & TACTICS, c.1900–1914 5 -POHFSSBOHF OFXFYQMPTJWFTBOEQSPQFMMBOUT JOEJSFDUGJSF 2VJDLGJSJOHGJFMEHVOTUIFA'SFODI BNNVOJUJPODPOTVNQUJPO 'JFMEIPXJU[FST 4JFHFBSUJMMFSZ )FBWZGJFMEBSUJMMFSZ DOCTRINE ON THE EVE OF WAR 9 5IFAFODPVOUFSCBUUMF *OUFSBSNDPPQFSBUJPO 3BOHFWTDPNNVOJDBUJPOT &RVJQNFOU 1914: MANOEUVRE WARFARE ON THE WESTERN FRONT 14 5IF#BUUMFPGUIF'SPOUJFST7JSUPO&UIF .POT 5IFSFUSFBUGSPN.POT 1915: STALEMATE, INVENTION & EXPANSION 22 1PTJUJPOBMXBSGBSF 3FUVSOPGUIFNPSUBS /FVWF$IBQFMMF BOEUIFA4IFMM$SJTJT 4UPSNUSPPQFST BOEJOGBOUSZHVOT 5IF)BSUNBOTXFJMFSLPQG 1916: THE WAR OF ATTRITION 28 7FSEVOUIFLJMMJOHGJFME TIFASPMMJOHCBSSBHF 4VSWFZBSUJMMFSZTDJFODFNBQToGMBTITQPUUJOHo TPVOESBOHJOH 5IF4PNNF5IFQSFQBSBUPSZCPNCBSENFOUo+VMZUIFADSFFQJOH CBSSBHF $PVOUFSCBUUFSZGJSF +VMZ(JODIZ1P[JÒSFT3JEHF -FBSOJOHGSPNEJTBTUFS THE EASTERN FRONT 47 5IF3VTTJBOBOE"VTUSP)VOHBSJBOBSNJFT 0QFOJOHDBNQBJHOT 5PCPMZ UIF#SVDINàMMFS NFUIPE 3JHBA)VUJFSUBDUJDT 1917: THE WESTERN FRONT 54 8JUIESBXBMUPUIF)JOEFOCVSH-JOF Arras 5IF/JWFMMF0GGFOTJWF .FTTJOFT Third Ypres 1BTTDIFOEBFMF $BNCSBJ 1918: ENDGAME ON THE WESTERN FRONT 61 The Kaiserschlacht "NJFOT BOEBGUFS CONCLUSIONS 63 INDEX 64 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com
    [Show full text]