Crimea PLAYBOOK  PLAYBOOK

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crimea PLAYBOOK  PLAYBOOK Crimea PLAYBOOK PLAYBOOK Game Design by Vance von Borries Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................... 2 10.3 Scenario 3: Crimea: The Road to Sevastopol .. 25 2.0 Game Basics ................................................... 2 10.4 Scenario 4: Sevastopol: First Assault ............... 27 3.0 Special Rules .................................................. 4 10.5 Scenario 5: Crimean Campaign ....................... 29 4.0 Special Movement Situations ......................... 5 10.6 Scenario 6: Kerch: The Party Boss Attacks ..... 32 5.0 The Sevastopol Inset Map .............................. 6 10.7 Scenario 7: Kerch: Operation Trappenjagd ...... 33 6.0 Air Units ......................................................... 9 10.8 Scenario 8: Sevastopol: Operation Storfang .... 36 7.0 Special Units and Situations ........................... 11 10.9 Scenario 9: The Kerch-Feodosiya Operation ... 38 8.0 Naval Operations ............................................ 13 11.0 Detailed Examples of Play ............................... 43 9.0 How to Set Up a Scenario .............................. 20 12.0 Designer’s Section ........................................... 46 10.0 SCENARIOS .................................................. 20 Credits ...................................................................... 49 10.1 Scenario 1: The Tartar Ditch........................... 20 Counter scans ........................................................... 50 10.2 Scenario 2: Odessa: Hero City ....................... 23 Expanded Sequence of Play ..................................... 54 GMT Games, LLC • P.O. Box 1308,© 2010 Hanford, GMT Games, CA 93232-1308 LLC • www.GMTGames.com Crimea PLAYBOOK • One 8.5 x 11 chart card with Super-Heavy Artillery Inset Effects .0 Introduction Table. ‘He who controls the Crimea is master of the Black Sea.’ • Two Air Unit Status/Unit Rebuilding Cards (one Soviet [beige] and one Axis [gray]). Historical Setting • Two Cards containing Scenario 3,4 and 5 Victory Conditions The Crimea is a large peninsular region in the Black Sea known • One 8.5 x 11 card with naval charts and tables by many invaders since antiquity. During the current era after be- • One 8.5 x 11 Card with Turn Record track and Weather Table ing held by the Crimean Tartars (Tatars) for three centuries, it was • 740 die-cut ½ inch counters in two full counter sheets and two annexed in 1783 by Catherine II (The Great) of Russia. Later, the half counter sheets Crimean War (1854 – 1856), fought by Britain, France, Turkey, and • One ten-sided die others against Russia, focused attention on the importance of the great Russian naval fortress at Sevastopol, an importance renewed . The Game Maps by the Second World War. .11 Maps are used as follows: In the fall of 1941 there could be no question whether the Axis would • Scenarios 1, 2, 6, 7, 8 and 9 use separate scenario cards. invade the Crimea. The Soviets had been using air and naval bases • Scenarios 3, 4, and 5 use Map Q and the Sevastopol Inset map. there to threaten German oil supplies in Romania since the start of the war. When German troops fought their way into Crimea during .12 The Map-T Holding Box. This represents a large geographical October they had hoped it would be a quick campaign. Instead it region adjoining the game map for use by game units without the became protracted with a costly siege of over eight months at Sev- need for additional playing space. The holding box is printed on Map astopol. Where the British and French had dared to challenge the Q and appropriate scenario cards, and is used in most scenarios. Russians a century before; now it was Germany’s turn. NOTE: The actual Map T will be found in a later game in this series. General Introduction a. All Soviet units can to move to and from the Map-T Holding Barbarossa: Crimea recreates the World War II campaign in the Box. Axis ground units cannot enter it or attack Soviet units there Crimea, historically from late September 1941 through early July but Axis air units can conduct Shipping Attack missions [PB 6.44] 1942. One player will control the Axis forces (Germans and Roma- against Soviet naval units located there. nians), while his opponent controls the Soviet forces. The playing pieces represent the actual units that participated in the campaign b. Soviet air units designated as beginning their mission in the Map-T and the map represents the terrain over which those units fought. Holding Box count range [PB 6.13] beginning with any hex on the The players maneuver their units across the map and conduct combat east map edge south of hex 7011. according to the standard rules of play and the additional rules and c. Soviet artillery units in the Map-T Holding Box can conduct artil- scenario instructions found in this Play Book. One player wins by lery support combat on any hex on Map Q within range from the capturing certain specified objectives while his opponent wins by east map edge or from hex 7014; treat hex 7014 as in the Holding avoiding those victory conditions. Box (the artillery need not be positioned on hex 7014). More than one such artillery unit can support any one combat per combat phase .3 Combining Games if an HQ is with them in the Holding Box. These artillery units do This game is part of a series of games covering World War II in the not require Attack Supply. Soviet Union. Players should feel free to combine play of this game DESIGN NOTE: This is the Kerch Strait; the land on the far side with that of Barbarossa: Kiev to Rostov, (KtR), also published by is very close. GMT Games. All games of this series have been built with the idea they could be played together. Some share a few of the same histori- d. A player can place as many units as desired in Map-T Holding cal units. It is anticipated that players would want to explore more Box. There is no stacking limit. Units might be placed there At Start historical alternatives with combined play. To facilitate such play, or as reinforcements. Ground units leave only by naval transport some references to KtR are found in this Play Book with general procedure. There is no direct Map Q land connection with the hold- guidelines on combining play. ing box [exception: PB 10.44.c]. e. Map-T Holding Box is also a port (not a sea zone) adjacent only to the Kerch Sea Zone. For purposes of Naval unit basing and repair, the .0 Game Equipment Map-T Holding Box is considered a major port [Port characteristics Barbarossa: Crimea contains: on player aid card]. Naval units enter or leave by Naval Movement procedure [PB 8.2]. • One 22x34 inch map (map Q) • Four 11 x 17 Scenario Cards f. Map-T Holding Box provides General Supply during the Supply • Two double-sided Soviet Set Up Cards Determination Phase to all units there, and to all units on Map Q • Two Axis Set Up Cards (one double-sided) able to trace Supply to the Ice Bridge. • One 11x17 inch folded Chart Card with Combat Results Table, g. HQ units can attempt to recover to Operational status while in Terrain Effects Chart, movement charts, artillery and Non-Op HQ the Active Box or Map-T Holding Box. Their Non-Op status does charts not affect other units in either box. • One 11x17 inch folded Chart Card with “How to Read Units” h. A Zap unit can increase a unit while that unit is in Map-T Hold- information, air combat, AA fire, interdiction effects, overrun and ing Box. combat related charts © 2010 GMT Games, LLC Crimea PLAYBOOK 3 i. Units in the Map T Holding Box marked with Garrison markers are released individually. The Playing Pieces .21 Carefully remove the cardboard playing pieces from the counter sheets and sort them into categories. Refer to the “How to Read Units” information on one of the 11x17 Chart Cards. Unit counters are not coded for specific scenarios (as was done in previous games of this series). .3 Barbarossa Standard Rules (BSRs): Exceptions and Changes “No one is forgotten, nothing is forgotten.” —Red Army slogan .3 Take time to familiarize yourself with all additions and excep- tions to the BSRs contained in this Play Book and in the scenario Example of extending a captured rail line in Dry Weather you are playing. Some BSRs used in previous games of this series have been changed for Crimea and their accompanying charts and c. When an Axis converted Railhead marker is moved forward by tables have been revised to reflect those changes. Rules changes expending RCPs, any adjacent captured rear Railhead marker is have been noted in many Play Book rules sections with reference moved back by an equal number of hexes. to the appropriate BSR. .3 The Sevastopol Inset Map. Unit density in the Sevastopol area forced a change to a different scale to prevent stacking problems and static game play [See PB 5.0 for a complete discussion]. .33 Naval Operations. The need for transport of reinforcements and supplies by sea adds another dimension to regular game play [see PB 8.0 for a complete discussion]. These rules will be retrofitted at a later date to allow play in Army Group North. .34 Captured Rail Lines [addition to BSR 9.0] HISTORICAL NOTE: During late 1941, overextended Axis forces resorted to using captured Soviet rolling stock and unconverted Soviet rail lines to remain in Example of Converting captured rail hexes. supply. d. There is no hex length limit to the hex length of a captured rail a. During the Axis Engineering Phase after expending rail conversion line, but the 60 hex per turn limit for rail movement applies to both points, the Axis player may extend the railnet by bringing uncon- converted and captured rail lines. verted Soviet rail lines under Axis control. Scenario instructions will specify how many captured rail lines may be utilized, but the e.
Recommended publications
  • Sounds of War and Peace: Soundscapes of European Cities in 1945
    10 This book vividly evokes for the reader the sound world of a number of Eu- Renata Tańczuk / Sławomir Wieczorek (eds.) ropean cities in the last year of the Second World War. It allows the reader to “hear” elements of the soundscapes of Amsterdam, Dortmund, Lwów/Lviv, Warsaw and Breslau/Wrocław that are bound up with the traumatising experi- ences of violence, threats and death. Exploiting to the full methodologies and research tools developed in the fields of sound and soundscape studies, the Sounds of War and Peace authors analyse their reflections on autobiographical texts and art. The studies demonstrate the role urban sounds played in the inhabitants’ forging a sense of 1945 Soundscapes of European Cities in 1945 identity as they adapted to new living conditions. The chapters also shed light on the ideological forces at work in the creation of urban sound space. Sounds of War and Peace. War Sounds of Soundscapes of European Cities in Volume 10 Eastern European Studies in Musicology Edited by Maciej Gołąb Renata Tańczuk is a professor of Cultural Studies at the University of Wrocław, Poland. Sławomir Wieczorek is a faculty member of the Institute of Musicology at the University of Wrocław, Poland. Renata Tańczuk / Sławomir Wieczorek (eds.) · Wieczorek / Sławomir Tańczuk Renata ISBN 978-3-631-75336-1 EESM 10_275336_Wieczorek_SG_A5HC globalL.indd 1 16.04.18 14:11 10 This book vividly evokes for the reader the sound world of a number of Eu- Renata Tańczuk / Sławomir Wieczorek (eds.) ropean cities in the last year of the Second World War. It allows the reader to “hear” elements of the soundscapes of Amsterdam, Dortmund, Lwów/Lviv, Warsaw and Breslau/Wrocław that are bound up with the traumatising experi- ences of violence, threats and death.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank of Russia Holds a Week of Financial Literacy in the Crimea | Bank of Russia
    12 Neglinnaya Street, Moscow, 107016 Russia 8 800 300-30-00 www.cbr.ru News Bank of Russia holds a Week of Financial Literacy in the Crimea 17 November 2015 News The Bank of Russia held a Week of Financial Literacy in the Crimea attended by over 4,000 people, who had got the opportunity to address questions to Bank of Russia representatives and experts invited. Thirty-nine experts from the Bank of Russia, Association of Russian Banks, Association of Regional Banks of Russia, National Payments Council, and Deposit Insurance Agency delivered lectures in Simferopol, Sevastopol, Yalta, Kerch, Feodosia, Koktebel, Yevpatoria, Alushta, Saki district, Gurzuf, Shchelkino, Lenino, and other settlements of the Crimea. Trainings staged at 77 grounds were attended by schoolchildren, students, employees of enterprises and organisations, and also pensioners, for whom such trainings were organised for the first time. The Bank of Russia has been holding weeks of financial literacy in the Crimea Federal District starting 2014. The primary goal of lectures, lessons, meetings, and expert consultations is to provide population of the new Russian region with the required knowledge of the financial system of the Russian Federation and respective legislation, help determine demands and preferences to make rational financial decisions. This time the topical issues were specifics of Russian consumer loan agreement, main types of compulsory insurance, foreign exchange control, and financial monitoring. Bank of Russia lecturers prepared a special game for middle and senior pupils ‘Draw up Personal Financial Plan’ and also offered them to imagine themselves as a bank or an insurance company and tell their classmates about their activities.
    [Show full text]
  • General Licence
    GENERAL LICENCE INT/2020/059 1. This licence is granted under regulation 64 of The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (“The Russia Regulations”). 2. Any act which would otherwise breach the prohibitions in Regulations 11 to 15 of The Russia Regulations is exempt from those prohibitions to the extent required to give effect to the permissions in this licence. 3. In this licence: a “Person” means An individual, a body of persons corporate or unincorporate, any organisation or any association or combination of persons. “Crimean Sea Ports” means State Unitary Enterprise of the Crimean Republic ‘Crimean Sea Ports’, an entity designated under regulation 5 of The Russia Regulations for the purposes of regulations 11 to 15 (asset-freeze etc.) and includes: Kerch Fishery Port, Yalta Commercial Port, Evpatoria Commercial Port, Gosgidrografiya and Port-Terminal branches of the Crimean Sea Ports. a “Relevant Institution” means A person that has permission under Part 4A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000(3) (permission to carry on regulated activity). Permissions 4. Under this licence, subject to the conditions in Paragraphs 5-8 below: 4.1 A Person may make payment(s) out of non-frozen funds to the Crimean Sea Ports for services provided at the ports of Kerch Fishery Port, Yalta Commercial Port and Evpatoria Commercial Port, and for services provided by Gosgidrografiya and by Port-Terminal branches of the Crimean Sea Ports. 4.2 A Person may be reimbursed out of non-frozen funds for payments it makes in accordance with paragraph 4.1 above. 4.3 Relevant Institutions may process payments made in accordance with paragraphs 4.1 and/or 4.2 above.
    [Show full text]
  • They Fought for Independent Poland
    2019 Special edition PISMO CODZIENNE Independence Day, November 11, 2019 FREE AGAIN! THEY FOUGHT FOR INDEPENDENT POLAND Dear Readers, The day of November 11 – the National Independence Day – is not accidentally associated with the Polish military uni- form, its symbolism and traditions. Polish soldiers on almost all World War I fronts “threw on the pyre their lives’ fate.” When the Polish occupiers were drown- ing in disasters and revolutions, white- and-red flags were fluttering on Polish streets to mark Poland’s independence. The Republic of Poland was back on the map of Europe, although this was only the beginning of the battle for its bor- ders. Józef Piłsudski in his first order to the united Polish Army shared his feeling of joy with his soldiers: “I’m taking com- mand of you, Soldiers, at the time when the heart of every Pole is beating stron- O God! Thou who from on high ger and faster, when the children of our land have seen the sun of freedom in all its Hurls thine arrows at the defenders of the nation, glory.” He never promised them any bat- We beseech Thee, through this heap of bones! tle laurels or well-merited rest, though. On the contrary – he appealed to them Let the sun shine on us, at least in death! for even greater effort in their service May the daylight shine forth from heaven’s bright portals! for Poland. And they never let him down Let us be seen - as we die! when in 1920 Poland had to defend not only its own sovereignty, but also entire Europe against flooding bolshevism.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Sea-Caspian Steppe: Natural Conditions 20 1.1 the Great Steppe
    The Pechenegs: Nomads in the Political and Cultural Landscape of Medieval Europe East Central and Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 450–1450 General Editors Florin Curta and Dušan Zupka volume 74 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ecee The Pechenegs: Nomads in the Political and Cultural Landscape of Medieval Europe By Aleksander Paroń Translated by Thomas Anessi LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided no alterations are made and the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. Publication of the presented monograph has been subsidized by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education within the National Programme for the Development of Humanities, Modul Universalia 2.1. Research grant no. 0046/NPRH/H21/84/2017. National Programme for the Development of Humanities Cover illustration: Pechenegs slaughter prince Sviatoslav Igorevich and his “Scythians”. The Madrid manuscript of the Synopsis of Histories by John Skylitzes. Miniature 445, 175r, top. From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository. Proofreading by Philip E. Steele The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://catalog.loc.gov/2021015848 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Youth on the March: the All-Union Tours of Military Glory, 1965–87
    This is a repository copy of Soviet Youth on the March: The All-Union Tours of Military Glory, 1965–87. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/96606/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Hornsby, R (2017) Soviet Youth on the March: The All-Union Tours of Military Glory, 1965–87. Journal of Contemporary History, 52 (2). pp. 418-445. ISSN 0022-0094 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009416644666 © 2016, The Author. This is an author produced version of a paper published in Journal of Contemporary History. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Soviet Youth on the March: the All-Union Tours of Military Glory, 1965-87 ‘To the paths, friends, to the routes of military glory’1 The first train full of young people pulled into Brest station from Moscow at 10.48 on the morning of 18 September 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration by the High Representative Federica Mogherini on Behalf of the EU on the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the City of Sevastopol
    PRESS Council of the EU EN PRESS RELEASE 195/19 17/03/2019 Declaration by the High Representative Federica Mogherini on behalf of the EU on the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol Five years on from the illegal annexation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol by the Russian Federation, the European Union remains steadfast in its commitment to Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. The European Union reiterates that it does not recognise and continues to condemn this violation of international law. It remains a direct challenge to international security, with grave implications for the international legal order that protects the territorial integrity, unity and sovereignty of all States. The European Union remains committed to fully implementing its non-recognition policy, including through restrictive measures. The European Union calls again on UN Member States to consider similar non-recognition measures in line with the UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262. Russia's violations of international law have led to a dangerous increase in tensions at the Kerch Strait and the Sea of Azov. The unjustified use of force by Russia against Ukraine on 25 November 2018 is a reminder of the negative effects of the illegal annexation of the Crimean peninsula on regional stability. The EU reiterates its call on Russia to release the illegally captured Ukrainian crewmembers, vessels and equipment unconditionally and without further delay. Pending their release, Russia should respect their rights to legal representation and access by consular authorities, and to provide the injured crewmen with appropriate medical treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of Wartime Commercial Policy
    Planning for the Short Haul: The Formation of Wartime Commercial Policy Mariya Grinberg [email protected] Draft paper prepared for IPES, November 18, 2017. Please do not cite or circulate without permission of the author. In times of war, why do belligerents continue to trade with each other? There are two countervailing forces that affect this decision. On the one hand, conventional wisdom in economics holds that states have absolute gains from trade. Therefore, economic considerations should push states to engage in mutually beneficial trading relationships, regardless of the security environment. In other words, states should always trade with the enemy. On the other hand, conventional wisdom in international relations holds that trading with a security adversary has negative security externalities. A state can use these benefits from trade to increase its military capabilities which, in turn, can be used in the war effort against the state it is trading with. Thus according to security considerations, states should never trade with the enemy. Empirically, it is possible to see wide variation in the choices states make about their wartime commercial policy. Some states chose to continue their trade throughout the war, for example India and Pakistan in the Kargil War (1999) or Yugoslavia and Croatia in the War of Bosnian Independence (1992). Other states chose to cut off trade immediately at the start of the war, for example India and Pakistan in the Second Kashmir War (1965) or England and Argentina in the Falkland Islands War (1982). Yet other states start off trading with the enemy only to change course during the war and sever the commercial relationship in the middle of the conflict, as for example occurred in the Iran-Iraq War of 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • Up to Their Elbows in Blood: the Crimean War and The
    UP TO THEIR ELBOWS IN BLOOD: THE CRIMEAN WAR AND THE PROFESSIONALIZATION OF MEDICINE Fought in the mid-1850s, many scholars regard the Crimean War as largely insignificant. However in reality, the historical contributions of the war are important – particularly those contributions pertaining to medicine. This seemingly “unnecessary” war facilitated the modernization of Western medicine; methods used during and directly after the Crimean War were standard until World War Two. A brief history of the war reveals medical data that constitutes the bulk of my interpretation. The war’s specific medical achievements are highlighted throughout the essay. The findings in this paper are by no means conclusive, but they exhibit that it is important to look beyond Florence Nightingale, the war’s most famous and studied individual, and gaze upon the larger trends of medicine. Her story is covered in some detail in this paper, but she is not the sole source of innovation from this rather disastrous war. The professionalization of Western medicine stands out as one of the great accomplishments of this war, despite scholars viewing the war as useless. Key words: cholera epidemics, battlefield surgery, Florence Nightingale, Nikolay Pirogov, William Howard Russell, medical modernization Tyler Eaves HIST 586: Advanced Seminar in History May 11, 2017 Eaves 2 “It is good for us to be here”1 On the night of November 14, 1854, an exhausted woman penned a letter to a distant reader. By candlelight she scrawled in hurried script about the “appalling horror” surrounding her. “Steeped up to [their] necks in blood,” she and her helpers worked tirelessly upon men who “bear pain and mutilation with unshrinking heroism, and die or are cut up without a complaint.” Absences of brooms, soap, and towels only complicated the dire state of affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Roads of War Lead to 'Victory' Hall Starting Point for Bagration
    2 FOCUS The Minsk Times Thursday, July 3, 2014 Starting point for Bagration By Valentina Lavysheva The 7m tall memorial relief sculp- Memorial sculpture unveiled in Svetlogorsk ture features four figures: of Konstantin Near the village of Rakovichi, on the Rokossovsky, Georgy Zhukov, Pavel Ba- District to honour those who fought in Great 71st kilometre of the Bobruisk-Mozyr tov and Mikhail Panov — the military Patriotic War’s Operation Bagration motorway, a sculpture has been un- leaders who ensured the battle’s success. veiled, marking the spot on which bat- Soviet soldiers, partisans and seamen are tle unfolded seven decades ago. Those sculpted on the left and on the right, while who fought changed the course of the arrows behind indicate the two major at- war, helping bring about the liberation tack points. Names of villages liberated of Belarus, as well as parts of the Baltic during the campaign are inscribed at the States and Poland. It was here that the bottom. Great Patriotic War veterans at- famous military campaign of Operation tended the solemn unveiling ceremony, Bagration was launched, led by Marshall which honoured their bravery. Rokossovsky. Divisions passed over the Svetlogorsk historian Izyaslav Kotl- Bridsky Mokh marshes in June 1944, yarov initiated the idea, which has been wearing galoshes, and using drags and brought to life by Gomel sculptor Valery rafts to build log roads, to allow tanks to Kondratenko; his own father was a mili- pass and attack the Fascist occupiers. tary pilot participating in Bagration. The Great Patriotic War veteran Lev Kli- project received support from Alexan- movich, from Minsk, was among those der Lukashenko and funds of $1m from who began his war service on the marsh- the Union State budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Conrad Von Hötzendorf and the “Smoking Gun”: a Biographical Examination of Responsibility and Traditions of Violence Against Civilians in the Habsburg Army 55
    1914: Austria-Hungary, the Origins, and the First Year of World War I Günter Bischof, Ferdinand Karlhofer (Eds.) Samuel R. Williamson, Jr. (Guest Editor) CONTEMPORARY AUSTRIAN STUDIES | VOLUME 23 uno press innsbruck university press Copyright © 2014 by University of New Orleans Press, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. All inquiries should be addressed to UNO Press, University of New Orleans, LA 138, 2000 Lakeshore Drive. New Orleans, LA, 70119, USA. www.unopress.org. Printed in the United States of America Design by Allison Reu Cover photo: “In enemy position on the Piave levy” (Italy), June 18, 1918 WK1/ALB079/23142, Photo Kriegsvermessung 5, K.u.k. Kriegspressequartier, Lichtbildstelle Vienna Cover photo used with permission from the Austrian National Library – Picture Archives and Graphics Department, Vienna Published in the United States by Published and distributed in Europe University of New Orleans Press by Innsbruck University Press ISBN: 9781608010264 ISBN: 9783902936356 uno press Contemporary Austrian Studies Sponsored by the University of New Orleans and Universität Innsbruck Editors Günter Bischof, CenterAustria, University of New Orleans Ferdinand Karlhofer, Universität Innsbruck Assistant Editor Markus Habermann
    [Show full text]