DOCSLIB.ORG

The Threshold of Self-Consciousness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Threshold of Self-Consciousness The Threshold of Self-Consciousness Stephane Joseph Savanah BSc(Hons), DipEd, PGDipDataProc, PGDipPhil ARC Centre of Excellence for Cognition and its Disorders Department of Cognitive Science Macquarie University Sydney, Australia June 2012 Table of Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................................... vii Statement of Candidate .......................................................................................................................... ix Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. x Part 1: The Nature of Self-Consciousness Chapter 1: The Self and Self-Consciousness ....................................................................................... 2 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2 Some Terminological Points ........................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Self-Consciousness and the Self-Concept ..................................................................................... 4 1.3 Conceptions of the Self ................................................................................................................. 5 The Physically Extended Self ......................................................................................................... 6 The Temporally Extended Self ....................................................................................................... 8 The Social Self ................................................................................................................................ 8 The Agentive Self............................................................................................................................ 9 The Metacognitive Self ................................................................................................................. 10 A Fundamental Concept of the Self .............................................................................................. 11 1.4 Self-Consciousness Research Paradigms .................................................................................... 11 Mirror Self-Recognition ................................................................................................................ 12 Theory of Mind ............................................................................................................................. 13 Episodic Memory .......................................................................................................................... 16 Self-Evaluative Emotions .............................................................................................................. 17 Metacognition ............................................................................................................................... 17 1.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 2: Introspection and the Fundamental Dichotomy ........................................................... 19 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 19 The Fundamental Dichotomy ........................................................................................................ 21 2.2 Access to the Self ........................................................................................................................ 23 Perceptual Model versus Privileged Access .................................................................................. 23 Introspection .................................................................................................................................. 25 Self-Givenness .............................................................................................................................. 27 Introspection and Concept Possession .......................................................................................... 31 ii 2.3 The Correspondence Thesis ........................................................................................................ 32 Transitive versus Intransitive Self-Consciousness ....................................................................... 33 Self-as-Subject versus Self-as-Object ........................................................................................... 35 Unitary vs Non-Unitary Self ......................................................................................................... 37 Multiple Drafts Model .................................................................................................................. 40 Higher Order Thought .................................................................................................................. 41 Immunity to Error through Misidentification (IEM) and Reference Failure ................................ 43 Elusiveness Thesis ........................................................................................................................ 44 The Essential Indexical ................................................................................................................. 46 2.4 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 51 Chapter 3: The Concept Possession Hypothesis of Self-Consciousness ......................................... 53 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 53 3.2 A Yardstick for Self-Consciousness ........................................................................................... 55 Three Levels of Development....................................................................................................... 56 3.3 Concepts and Non-Conceptual Content ...................................................................................... 61 Non-Conceptual Mental Content .................................................................................................. 63 The Conceptual Constraint ........................................................................................................... 64 Arguments against the Conceptual Constraint for Perceptual States ............................................ 66 State vs. Content Non-Conceptualism .......................................................................................... 68 3.4 Self, the Fundamental Concept ................................................................................................... 69 An Analogy with Perception ........................................................................................................ 70 The Web of Concepts ................................................................................................................... 71 Bermũdez and the Paradox of Self-Consciousness ....................................................................... 78 3.5 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 80 Chapter 4: Evidence of Concept Possession ..................................................................................... 82 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 82 4.2 The Language Question .............................................................................................................. 83 4.3 Positive Indications of Concept Possession ................................................................................ 85 Identification of a Specific Individual Concept Grasped by the Subject ...................................... 85 Thoughts in Propositional Form ................................................................................................... 86 Rationality..................................................................................................................................... 87 Symbol-Mindedness ..................................................................................................................... 91 4.4 The Standard of Evidence ........................................................................................................... 93 iii Programmatic Behaviour ............................................................................................................... 94 Associatively Learned Responses to Stimuli ................................................................................ 96 ‘Innate’ (Hard-Wired Species-Specific) Behaviour ...................................................................... 96 A Simple Test Case: Tool Use ...................................................................................................... 97 4.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 98 Part 2: Empirical Studies of Self-Consciousness Chapter 5: Mirror Self Recognition ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sexual Selection Research on Spiders: Progress and Biases
    Biol. Rev. (2005), 80, pp. 363–385. f Cambridge Philosophical Society 363 doi:10.1017/S1464793104006700 Printed in the United Kingdom Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases Bernhard A. Huber* Zoological Research Institute and Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany (Received 7 June 2004; revised 25 November 2004; accepted 29 November 2004) ABSTRACT The renaissance of interest in sexual selection during the last decades has fuelled an extraordinary increase of scientific papers on the subject in spiders. Research has focused both on the process of sexual selection itself, for example on the signals and various modalities involved, and on the patterns, that is the outcome of mate choice and competition depending on certain parameters. Sexual selection has most clearly been demonstrated in cases involving visual and acoustical signals but most spiders are myopic and mute, relying rather on vibrations, chemical and tactile stimuli. This review argues that research has been biased towards modalities that are relatively easily accessible to the human observer. Circumstantial and comparative evidence indicates that sexual selection working via substrate-borne vibrations and tactile as well as chemical stimuli may be common and widespread in spiders. Pattern-oriented research has focused on several phenomena for which spiders offer excellent model objects, like sexual size dimorphism, nuptial feeding, sexual cannibalism, and sperm competition. The accumulating evidence argues for a highly complex set of explanations for seemingly uniform patterns like size dimorphism and sexual cannibalism. Sexual selection appears involved as well as natural selection and mechanisms that are adaptive in other contexts only. Sperm competition has resulted in a plethora of morpho- logical and behavioural adaptations, and simplistic models like those linking reproductive morphology with behaviour and sperm priority patterns in a straightforward way are being replaced by complex models involving an array of parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Perception in Jumping Spiders (Araneae,Salticidae)
    Visual Perception in Jumping Spiders (Araneae,Salticidae) A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology at the University of Canterbury by Yinnon Dolev University of Canterbury 2016 Table of Contents Abstract.............................................................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................................... iii Preface ............................................................................................................................................................................. vi Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Innate pattern recognition and categorisation in a jumping Spider ........................................................... 9 Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Methods .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Portia Perceptions: the Umwelt of an Araneophagic Jumping Spider
    Portia Perceptions: The Umwelt of an Araneophagic Jumping 1 Spider Duane P. Harland and Robert R. Jackson The Personality of Portia Spiders are traditionally portrayed as simple, instinct-driven animals (Savory, 1928; Drees, 1952; Bristowe, 1958). Small brain size is perhaps the most compelling reason for expecting so little flexibility from our eight-legged neighbors. Fitting comfortably on the head of a pin, a spider brain seems to vanish into insignificance. Common sense tells us that compared with large-brained mammals, spiders have so little to work with that they must be restricted to a circumscribed set of rigid behaviors, flexibility being a luxury afforded only to those with much larger central nervous systems. In this chapter we review recent findings on an unusual group of spiders that seem to be arachnid enigmas. In a number of ways the behavior of the araneophagic jumping spiders is more comparable to that of birds and mammals than conventional wisdom would lead us to expect of an arthropod. The term araneophagic refers to these spiders’ preference for other spiders as prey, and jumping spider is the common English name for members of the family Saltici- dae. Although both their common and the scientific Latin names acknowledge their jumping behavior, it is really their unique, complex eyes that set this family of spiders apart from all others. Among spiders (many of which have very poor vision), salticids have eyes that are by far the most specialized for resolving fine spatial detail. We focus here on the most extensively studied genus, Portia. Before we discuss the interrelationship between the salticids’ uniquely acute vision, their predatory strategies, and their apparent cognitive abilities, we need to offer some sense of what kind of animal a jumping spider is; to do this, we attempt to offer some insight into what we might call Portia’s personality.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Spider Checklist
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • How Jumping Spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) Find and Use Indirect Routes to Reach Their Sighted Objectives
    Peckhamia 184.1 How jumping spiders use indirect routes 1 PECKHAMIA 184.1, 10 May 2019, 1―13 ISSN 2161―8526 (print) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1987105E-0056-4FCD-87EF-C29F74073AB9 (registered 08 MAY 2019) ISSN 1944―8120 (online) How jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) find and use indirect routes to reach their sighted objectives David E. Hill 1 1 213 Wild Horse Creek Drive, Simpsonville SC 29680, USA, email [email protected] Abstract. Jumping spiders (Salticidae) are not limited to planning their route at the onset of pursuit, but dynamically collect and use new information as they complete an indirect route or detour. There is strong support for the hypothesis that selection of the immediate route is based on the presence of a visible connection leading to the objective. In turn salticids can use these visible connections as secondary (or intermediate) objectives. Salticids can compute the expected direction and distance of their primary objective after they move to a new location, and frequently turn (reorient) to face their original objective to begin a new segment of pursuit. Completion of a sequence of these pursuit segments allows the salticid to successfully complete a complicated and indirect route of pursuit even when this is not visible at the onset. Key words. Anasaitis, cognition, Colonus, detour, direction information, distance information, gravity information, Habronattus, Hentzia, landmarks, Lyssomanes, Maevia, map direction, orientation, Phidippus, Platycryptus, Portia, reorientation, route selection, secondary objectives, segmented pursuit, Spartaeinae, spatial integration, visual cues The ability of salticid spiders to complete detoured or indirect pursuits of visual objectives has been known for some time (e.g., Bilsing 1920; Heil 1936; Hill 1977, 2008, 2018a; Jackson & Wilcox 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Aggressive Spiders Are Quick at Making Accurate Decisions, Good at Hunting Unpredictable Prey 28 July 2017
    Aggressive spiders are quick at making accurate decisions, good at hunting unpredictable prey 28 July 2017 Spiders, like humans and many other animals, spiders. The findings demonstrated that the have distinct personalities. Two studies by personalities of the jumping spiders are related to scientists from the National University of Singapore their cognitive styles. Results of this study were (NUS) unveiled interesting findings about the reported in scientific journal Behavioral Ecology in relationship between personality traits of spiders December 2016. and their decision making, as well as hunting styles. Assoc Prof Li explained, "The outcome is rather surprising, as our team had initially thought that decision making styles of spiders spiders that make quick decisions are more likely to make the wrong choices, similar to humans. This Studies have shown that when humans make new knowledge provides us with a better decisions in a haste, they tend to make more understanding of ecological processes like foraging mistakes. To investigate if the same holds true for and predator-prey interactions in the animal spiders, the NUS research team, led by Associate kingdom." Professor Li Daiqin from the Department of Biological Sciences at the NUS Faculty of Science, Foraging performance of spiders conducted studies on Portia labiata, a species of jumping spider. Portia labiata is known for its high When predators hunt for food, they will usually cognitive ability and complicated foraging consider the prey's size, speed of movement, and strategies, but its personality is unexplored. strength. While the predator's personality may not be ranked high on the list of factors, it has a The researchers first tested the aggressiveness of significant influence on the predator's hunting Portia labiata spiders by observing their responses strategy, according to another study conducted by when they are touched by a small soft brush.
    [Show full text]
  • Aranei: Salticidae)
    Arthropoda Selecta 29(1): 87–96 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2020 A contribution to the knowledge of jumping spiders from Thailand (Aranei: Salticidae) Ê ïîçíàíèþ ïàóêîâ-ñêàêóí÷èêîâ Òàèëàíäà (Aranei: Salticidae) R.R. Seyfulina1, G.N. Azarkina2*, V.M. Kartsev3 Ð.Ð. Ñåéôóëèíà1, Ã.Í. Àçàðêèíà2*, Â.Ì. Êàðöåâ3 1 Prioksko-Terrasnyi State Biosphere Reserve, Danki, Moscow Area 142200, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Приокско-Террасный государственный природный биосферный заповедник, Московская область, м. Данки 142200, Россия. 2 Laboratory of Systematics of Invertebrate Animals, Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Frunze street 11, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia. Лаборатория систематики беспозвоночных животных, Институт систематики и экологии животных СО РАН, ул. Фрунзе, 11, Новосибирск 630091, Россия. 3 Department of Entomology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119234, Russia. Кафедра энтомологии Биологического факультета Московского государственного университета имени М.В. Ломоносова, Ленин- ские Горы, Москва 119234, Россия. * Corresponding author KEY WORDS: Araneae, Arachnida, fauna, Oriental Region, Tarutao National Park. КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА: Araneae, Arachnida, фауна, Ориентальная область, Национальный парк Тару- тао. ABSTRACT. Jumping spiders of 10 species col- brachygnathus (Thorell, 1887), Plexippus paykulli lected from Satun, Sukhotai and Kanchanaburi Prov- (Audouin, 1826) и P. setipes Karsch, 1879 — отмече- inces of Thailand are studied. Six species are reported ны самые южные точки распространения в Таилан- from the country for the first time: Evarcha bulbosa де, для Stenaelurillus abramovi Logunov, 2008 — Żabka, 1985, Phintella vittata (C.L. Koch, 1846), Phin- самая южная точка ареала. Приводятся фотогра- telloides versicolor (C.L. Koch, 1846), and Portia la- фии живых особей для восьми видов, для H.
    [Show full text]
  • Clark Thesis.Pdf (8.256Mb)
    THE ROLE OF CHEMICAL CUES , IN THE PREDATORY AND ANTI-PREDATORY BEHAVIOUR OF JU~PING SPIDERS (ARANEAE, SAL TICIDAE) A Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in, Zoology at the University of Canterbury by Robert John Clark 2000 CONTENTS Abstract 1· Chapter 1: Introduction 3 Chapter 2: Theoretical background 9 Chapter 3: Chemical cues elicit prey capture in P. fimbriata 56 Chapter 4: Web use during predatory encounters between P. fimbriata, an araneophagic 91 jumping spider, and its preferred prey, other jumping spiders Chapter 5: Speculative hunting by an araneophagic jumping spider 108 Chapter 6: Chemical cues from ants influence predatory behaviour in Habrocestum pulex 125 (Hentz), an ant eating jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae) Chapter 7: Reactions of Habrocestum pulex, a myrmecophagic salticid, to potential 147 kairomones from ants Chapter 8: Dragllnes and assessment of fighting ability in cannibalistic jumping spiders 160 Chapter 9: Relationship between violent aggression in saltlcids and use of pheromones to 178 obtain information on conspeclfics Chapter10: Discussion 189 Acknowledgements 198 References 199 2 9 MAR 2000 1 ABSTRACT The role of chemical cues in prey-capture behaviour is studied in jumping spiders (Salticldae). Prior to this study, little attention has been given to how chemical cues influence the predatory behaviour of these spiders with complex eyes and visual acuity unrivalled In any other animals of comparable size. Three categories of predation are considered: salticids preying on conspecifics (cannibalism), salticids preying on non-conspecific spiders (araneophagy) and salticids preying on ants (myrmecophagy). Primary study animals are Portia spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Smarter Than the Average Bug - Life - 27 May 2006 - Print - New Scie
    Smarter than the average bug - life - 27 May 2006 - Print - New Scie...http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg19025531.400&print=true HOME | NEWS | EXPLORE BY SUBJECT | LAST WORD | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | ARCHIVE | RSS | JOBS Smarter than the average bug Click to Print 27 May 2006 From New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues. John McCrone LOOKING more like a flake of bark than a spider, Portia labiata stops to have a think. Portia is a jumping spider that makes a living by eating other spiders - a risky business at the best of times. Luckily Portia has brains. Right now it needs them. Portia, no bigger than a thumbnail, is perched on a branch with its beady eyes trained on a Scytodes pallida, another spider that specialises in eating other spiders. Scytodes is a spitting spider. It can squirt zig-zag jets of poison-coated silk from its mouth glands that would snare Portia in the blink of an eye. They are like two high-rolling gamblers about to bet all their chips on a single throw of the dice. Fortunately for Portia, Scytodes doesn't know it is being watched. Spitting spiders have weak eyes and Scytodes is content to lurk in its web in the cup of a curled leaf in the forests of the Philippine island of Luzon, until some unwitting passer-by stumbles in. Portia, on the other hand, Enlarge image has excellent eyesight, with spatial acuity better than a cat or a pigeon. From The thinking spider a safe distance about half a metre away, Portia sits scanning Scytodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Sex Pheromones: Emission, Reception, Structures, and Functions
    Biol. Rev. (2007), 82, pp. 27–48. 27 doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2006.00002.x Spider sex pheromones: emission, reception, structures, and functions A. C. Gaskett* Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia (Received 17 October 2005; revised 30 August 2006; accepted 11 September 2006) ABSTRACT Spiders and their mating systems are useful study subjects with which to investigate questions of widespread interest about sexual selection, pre- and post-copulatory mate choice, sperm competition, mating strategies, and sexual conflict. Conclusions drawn from such studies are broadly applicable to a range of taxa, but rely on accurate understanding of spider sexual interactions. Extensive behavioural experimentation demonstrates the presence of sex pheromones in many spider species, and recent major advances in the identification of spider sex pheromones merit review. Synthesised here are the emission, transmission, structures, and functions of spider sex pheromones, with emphasis on the crucial and dynamic role of sex pheromones in female and male mating strategies generally. Techniques for behavioural, chemical and electrophysiological study are summarised, and I aim to provide guidelines for incorporating sex pheromones into future studies of spider mating. In the spiders, pheromones are generally emitted by females and received by males, but this pattern is not universal. Female spiders emit cuticular and/or silk-based sex pheromones, which can be airborne or received via contact with chemoreceptors on male pedipalps. Airborne pheromones primarily attract males or elicit male searching behaviour. Contact pheromones stimulate male courtship behaviour and provide specific information about the emitter’s identity. Male spiders are generally choosy and are often most attracted to adult virgin females and juvenile females prior to their final moult.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Consonance: Complex Brain Functions in the Fruit Fly
    Opinion TRENDS in Neurosciences Vol.27 No.12 December 2004 Cognitive consonance: complex brain functions in the fruit fly and its relatives Ralph J. Greenspan and Bruno van Swinderen The Neurosciences Institute, 10640 John Jay Hopkins Drive, San Diego, CA 92121, USA The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, has become a the ability to be conditioned associatively with a given con- model for the study of a growing number of human ditioned stimulus (CS) becomes the most straightforward characteristics because of the power of its genetics. measure of recognition (i.e. perception) for that stimulus. Higher cognitive functions, however, might be assumed to be out of reach for the little fly. But the cumulative history of cognitive studies in insects and some of their The honeybee arachnid relatives, as well as specific probing of the The sophistication of honeybee cognition was first suggested by von Frisch’s pioneering studies of honeybee capabilities of fruit flies, suggests that even in this foraging. He demonstrated not only that scouts have the ethereal realm these creatures have much to contribute. ability to translate their experience of finding a nectar What are the degrees of sophistication in cognitive source into a sophisticated set of signals, the ‘dance’, but behavior displayed by these organisms, how have they also that the observers of this dance have the ability to been demonstrated, and what is their potential for translate it into a sequence of navigational maneuvers [1]. understanding how our own brains work? These abilities are suggestive of the presence of explicit memory, a high-level cognitive function that involves Beginning with Aristotle, continuing through Descartes, memory of places, facts and events [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Olfaction-Based Mate-Odour Identification by Jumping
    J Ethol (2013) 31:29–34 DOI 10.1007/s10164-012-0345-x ARTICLE Love is in the air: olfaction-based mate-odour identification by jumping spiders from the genus Cyrba Ana M. Cerveira • Robert R. Jackson Received: 19 March 2012 / Accepted: 27 August 2012 / Published online: 19 September 2012 Ó Japan Ethological Society and Springer 2012 Abstract Jumping spiders (Salticidae) are known for the difficulty of ruling out olfaction when attempting to test having good eyesight, but the extent to which they rely on for chemotactile cues. olfaction is poorly understood. Here we demonstrate for the first time that olfactory pheromones are used by two Keywords Olfaction Á Mate identification Á species from the salticid genus Cyrba (C. algerina and Mating systems Á Pheromones Á Salticidae C. ocellata). Using a Y-shape olfactometer, we investi- gated the ability of adult males and females of both species to discriminate between mate and non-mate odour. A Introduction hidden spider or a spider’s draglines (no spider present) were used as odour sources. There was no evident response Specific compounds or blends of compounds, known as by females of either Cyrba species to any tested odour. pheromones, often function as signals that mediate inter- Males of both species chose odour from conspecific actions between conspecific individuals (Shorey 1976; females, or their draglines, significantly more often than Maynard Smith and Harper 2003; Carde and Millar 2004; the no-odour control, but there was no evident response by Bradbury and Vehrenchamp 2011). Perhaps all animals males to any of the other odours (conspecific male and rely to some extent on chemoreception (Wyatt 2003; heterospecific female).
    [Show full text]