The Life Cycle of Three Species of Portia (Salticidae, Spartaeinae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Life Cycle of Three Species of Portia (Salticidae, Spartaeinae) THE CYCLE OF THREE SPECIES PORTIA. SALTIer ,SPARTAEINAE) SUSAN E A. HALLAS A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the for the Doctor of Phil in the University of Unive ty of 7 Ii , II i CONTENTS i/I I (I ~~' l page List of Tables iv List of Figures v Abstract 1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 3 THE SALTICIDAE 3 PORTIA, AN ABERRANT SALTICID 3 CENTRAL QUESTIONS 5 PHYLOGENETIC STATUS OF PORTIA'S PECULIARITIES 5 PLAN OF THE THESIS 10 CHAPTER 2: HATCHING AND EARLY POST-EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE SALTICIDAE 12 INTRODUCTION 12 METHODS 13 TERMINOLOGY 14 RESULTS 15 ECLOSION 15 POST-HATCHING DEVELOPMENT 19 DEVELOPMENTAL TIMING 21 DISCUSSION 21 CHAPTER 3: LIFE HISTORY IN THE LABORATORY OF THREE SPECIES OF PORTIA, WEB-BUILDING ~UMPING SPIDERS (SALTICIDAE, ARANEAE) 25 INTRODUCTION 25 METHODS 26 RESULTS 27 APPEARANCE 27 MOULTING 28 AGE-SPECIFIC MORTALITY 31 SURVIVAL TO MATURITY 34 NUMBER OF INSTARS 34 INSTAR DURATION 34 MATURATION TIME 36 ADULT LONGEVITY 36 INTItASPECIFIC VARIATION IN GROWTH INCREMENT 36 ii INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION IN GROWTH INCREMENT 41 MORPHOLOGICAL INDICES OF SPECIES' GROWTH PATTERNS 43 DISCUSSION 43 MOULTING SURVIVAL AND MORTALITY 44 NUMBER OF INS TARS AND MATURATION TIME 46 INSTAR DURATION 48 ADULT LONGEVITY 48 GROWTH 50 CONCLUDING REMARKS 55 CHAPTER 4: OVIPOSITION BIOLOGY OF PORTIA, WEB-BUILDING JUMPING SPIDERS (ARANEAE, SALTICIDAE) 56 INTRODUCTION 56 METHODS 57 RESULTS 59 INTERSPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN BATCH SIZE 59 ABDOMEN SIZE AND DISTENSION 61 VARIATION IN EGG SIZE 61 DIFFERENCES IN BATCH SIZE BETWEEN SEQUENTIAL BATCHES 65 TIMING OF OVIPOSITION 66 FERTILITY OF BATCHES 66 DISCUSSION 67 THE AFFECT OF LATITUDE 67 THE AFFECT OF FEMALE SIZE 69 THE AFFECT OF FORAGING STRATEGY 71 CONCLUSION 72 CHAPTER 5: THE ONTOGENY OF BEHAVIOUR IN PORTIA FIMBRIATA, P. LABIATA AND P. SCHULTZI, WEB-BUILDING JUMPING SPIDERS (ARANEAE, SALTICIDAE) 74 INTRODUCTION 74 METHODS 75 GENERAL 75 NORMATIVE ASSESSMENT 76 EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATIONS 78 l:Prior Experience with Web-spider Prey 78 2:Prior Experience with Salticid Prey 78 3:Prior Experience with Insects in Alien Webs & Spider Eggs 78 RESULTS 78 PREDATORY BEHAVIOUR 78 WEB-BUILDING BEHAVIOUR 79 DEFENSIVE BEHAVIOUR 81 INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTIONS 81 EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATIONS 82 iii DISCUSSION 82 CHAPTER 6: THE ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION OF PREDATORY BEHAVIOUR IN PORTIA (SALTICIDAE, SPARTAEINAE), ARANEOPHAGIC JUMPING SPIDERS 85 INTRODUCTION 85 METHODS 86 SUMMARY OF INTERSPECIFIC (PREDATORY) DISPLAYS AND INTRASPECIFIC DISPLAYS 87 VIBRATORY BEHAVIOURS 87 CRYPTIC STALKING 89 INTRASPECIFIC DISPLAYS 90 RESULTS 90 GROOMING BEHAVIOURS 90 Grooming of the Palps 91 Grooming of the Legs 92 STARTLE RESPONSES 92 DISCUSSION 94 GROOMING BEHAVIOURS AS ANTECEDENTS OF VIBRATORY BEHAVIOURS 94 ORIGINS OF FLUTTERING 95 ORIGINS OF PLUCKING 96 ORIGINS OF STRIKING 97 ORIGINS OF CRYPTIC STALKING 97 CONCLUSIONS 98 CHAPTER 7: GENERAL DISCUSSION 100 THE LIFE CYCLE OF PORTIA 100 IS THE LIFE CYCLE OF PORTIA ABERRANT? 102 THE PHYLOGENETIC STATUS OF AN ABERRANT LIFE CYCLE 102 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 107 REFERENCES 108 APPENDICES 117 1: SALTICIDS STUDIED AND SALIENT FEATURES OF THEIR NATURAL HISTORIES 117 2: MEAN DIMENSIONS AND COEFFICIENTS OF VARIATION OF 5 CARAPACE MEASURES (SEE FIG. 1) FOR THREE SPECIES OF PORTIA 1.18 iv LIST OF TABLES table chapter no. page 2 1 Medians and ranges (days) for time from oviposition for events of salticid post­ embryonic development, and their duration. 16 2 2 Traits specific to post-embryonic larvae of 9 species of salticids. 17 3 1 Summary of life history data for 3 species of laboratory-reared Portia. 32 3 2 Test-statistics for pairwise comparisons of life history data of 3 species of Portia. 32 3 3 Survival to maturity, as a percentage of first instars, for 3 species Portia. 34 3 4 Chi-square values for tests for differences in ins tar in which maturation occurs for 3 species of Portia. 36 3 5 F-statistics of two-way ANOVA's performed on growth indices (see Fig.l) for the effect of moult number and survival class of 3 Portia species. 40 3 6 F-statistics of two-way ANOVA's performed on ~rowth indices (see Fig.l) for the effect of moult number and sex of 3 Portia species. 41 3 7 Summary of results for two-way ANOVA's for the effect of sex class and moult type on growth indices (see Fig.l) of 3 species of Portia. 42 3 8 Principal component analysis of growth indices (see Fig.l) of 3 species of Portia at selected moults. 45 3 9 Instar of maturity of 15' species of spiders (males and females) from the literature. 47 3 10 Species in which females live longer than males, from the literature. 49 4 1 Salticids investigated and the nature of oviposition data collected from each species. 58 4 2 Maximum and mean batch sizes of 24 species of salticids, ranked by increasing maximum batch size. 59 v 4 3 Abdomen distension data on females of 5 species of Salticidae. 62 4 4 Mean egg volumes for 17 species of salticids. 63 5 1 Arthropods used in maintenance, rearing and tests for behaviour in Portia. 77 LIST OF FIGURES figure chapter no. page 2 1 Salticid egg with air spaces surrounding 18 appendages, with egg teeth and stress wrinkles. 2 2 Chorion and vitelline membrane partially shed during the first phase of eclosion, exposing a first prelarva. 18 2 3 Second prelarva of salticid post-embryonic development resulting from combined eclosion and first ecdysis. 18 2 4 Larval stage of salticid post-embryonic development, resulting from second ecdysis. 18 2 5 Ventral view of elongated fang found in the larval stage of Cyrba. 20 2 6 Ventral view of pointed, elongated fang found in the larval stage of Portia. 20 3 1 Carapace of Portia sp. Bars indicate measure­ ments recorded for size and growth. 27 3 2 Second instar of P. fimbriata. 29 3 3 Fourth instar of P. fimhriata. 29 3 4 Second instar of P. labiata. 29 3 5 Fourth instar of P. labiata. 29 3 6 Sixth instar of P. labiata, subadult male. 30 3 7 Second instar of P. schultzi. 30 3 8 Fourth instar of P. schultzi. 30 3 9 Survivorship values (Ix) for 3 species of Portia for successive instars. 33 vi 3 10 Percentage of adult males and females which matured in various instars for 3 species of Portia. 35 3 11 Mean growth increments and standard errors for juvenile instars of P. fimbriata. 37 3 12 Mean growth increments and standard errors for juvenile instars of P. labiata. 38 3 13 Mean growth increments and standard errors for juvenile instars of P. schultzi. 39 3 14 Growth increments of juveniles of 4 species salticids, taken from the literature. 51 4 1 Regression lines for mean batch size and for maximum batch size against female body size. 60 4 2 Regression line for mean egg size against female body size. 64 4 3 Regression lines for batch size against batch number for 3 species of Portia. 65 5 1 Regression line for area of Type 1 web against instar number. 80 5 2 Regression line for volume of Type 2 web against instar number. 80 6 1 Portia with palps held in frontal position. 88 6 2 Portia holding 1 palp between chelicerae prior to palp chewing behaviour. 88 6 3 Portia with palps held in forward-frontal position. 88 6 4 Palp swipe behaviour of Portia. 88 6 5 Palp rubbing behaviour qf Portia. 88 6 6 Cryptic rest posture of Portia. 90 Abstract The life cycle of the araneophagic, web-building, and therefore unusual salticid Portia (Spartaeinae) was investigated through labor­ atory studies of three species: P. fimbriata (Queensland, Australia), P. labiata (Sri Lanka), and P. schultzi (Kenya). The sequence and nature of morphological changes associated with the three stages of early post-embryonic development (prelarva 1, prelarva 2 and larva) were similar between the species. Several traits character­ istic of active instars of typical salticids appeared in the larval stage of Portia, most notably prey consumption and silk spinning. Virtually the complete repertoire of the species-specific behaviours of Portia was present in first instars, including web-building, web­ invasion, silk vibratory behaviours, and cryptic stalking. Leaf-raising behaviour appeared in instars 3-4, and in males disappeared, as did web­ building. Five new grooming behaviours were described in Portia: palp chew; palp swipe; palp brush; leg chew; leg brush. The routes by which these and other behaviours may have become ritualised into silk vibratory and cryptic stalking behaviours were considered. Portia moulted every 2-3 weeks, maturing in instars 5-10 (varying between species, sexes, and individuals). The period of peak mortality varied between species but c. 24% of first instars of each species reached maturity. Adult female Portia lived two to three times longer than males (i.e., males had mean longevities of 61-172 days). The growth rates of Portia fluctuated during development (means: 0.24 lengthwise; 0.19 widthwise), but always decreased in the final moult to maturity. Batch and egg sizes of Portia species varied with volumetric measures of female size (e.g., cubed body length, abdomen volume) and latitude of origin. Of the developmental traits of Portia, four were unusual for a salticid: precocial appearance of certain traits in the larval stage of post-embryonic development of Portia; moulting in a large three­ dimensional web rather than inside an enclosing silk nest; lengthwise growth rates comparable to those of web-builders of other families; and fluctuating rather than progressively increasing instar durations. None of these aberrant traits of the life cycle seem to clarify our under­ standing of Portia's position in salticid evolution.
Recommended publications
  • Molecular Phylogeny, Divergence Times and Biogeography of Spiders of the Subfamily Euophryinae (Araneae: Salticidae) ⇑ Jun-Xia Zhang A, , Wayne P
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 68 (2013) 81–92 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molec ular Phylo genetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Molecular phylogeny, divergence times and biogeography of spiders of the subfamily Euophryinae (Araneae: Salticidae) ⇑ Jun-Xia Zhang a, , Wayne P. Maddison a,b a Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 b Department of Botany and Beaty Biodiversity Museum, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 article info abstract Article history: We investigate phylogenetic relationships of the jumping spider subfamily Euophryinae, diverse in spe- Received 10 August 2012 cies and genera in both the Old World and New World. DNA sequence data of four gene regions (nuclear: Revised 17 February 2013 28S, Actin 5C; mitochondrial: 16S-ND1, COI) were collected from 263 jumping spider species. The molec- Accepted 13 March 2013 ular phylogeny obtained by Bayesian, likelihood and parsimony methods strongly supports the mono- Available online 28 March 2013 phyly of a Euophryinae re-delimited to include 85 genera. Diolenius and its relatives are shown to be euophryines. Euophryines from different continental regions generally form separate clades on the phy- Keywords: logeny, with few cases of mixture. Known fossils of jumping spiders were used to calibrate a divergence Phylogeny time analysis, which suggests most divergences of euophryines were after the Eocene. Given the diver- Temporal divergence Biogeography gence times, several intercontinental dispersal event sare required to explain the distribution of euophry- Intercontinental dispersal ines. Early transitions of continental distribution between the Old and New World may have been Euophryinae facilitated by the Antarctic land bridge, which euophryines may have been uniquely able to exploit Diolenius because of their apparent cold tolerance.
    [Show full text]
  • Wanless 1980A
    A revision of the spider genus Macopaeus (Araneae : Salticidae) F. R. Wanless Department of Zoology, British Museum (Natural History) Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD Introduction The genus Macopaeus Simon, 1900 formerly included three species. The type species M. spinosus Simon belongs in the subfamily Lyssomaninae and is clearly related to Asemonea O. P. -Cambridge and Pandisus Simon. The original description of M. spinosus was based on a female, but Simon (1900) did not indicate the number of specimens examined. A female type specimen was examined by Roewer (1965) who diagnosed the genus but did not provide a description of the species. Despite the fact that this specimen has been subsequently lost and that the epigyne has never been figured, the spines on leg I are arranged in a distinctive manner and it is possible to identify the species with reasonable certainty. The other two species M. madagascarensis Peckham & Peckham from Madagascar, and M. celebensis Merian from Celebes are not related to M. spinosus, but belong in the genus Brettus Simon which has recently been revised by the author (Wanless, 1979). In the present paper Macopaeus is redefined; M. spinosus, Brettus celebensis comb, n., and B. madagascarensis comb, n., are described and figured; and a neotype is designated for M. spinosus. The measurements were made in the manner described by Wanless (1978). Genus MACOPAEUS Simon Macopaeus Simon, 1900 : 381. Type species Macopaeus spinosus Simon, by original designation and : 181. monotypy. Simon 1901 : 394, 397, 399. Merian, 1911 303. Petrunkevitch, 1928: Roewer, 1954 : 932; 1965 : 6. Bonnet, 1957 : 2684. DEFINITION. Spiders of medium size (4'0-8'0 mm).
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Simonid Spiders (Araneae: Salticidae: Salticinae) in India
    IJBI 2 (2), (DECEMBER 2020) 247-276 International Journal of Biological Innovations Available online: http://ijbi.org.in | http://www.gesa.org.in/journals.php DOI: https://doi.org/10.46505/IJBI.2020.2223 Review Article E-ISSN: 2582-1032 DIVERSITY OF SIMONID SPIDERS (ARANEAE: SALTICIDAE: SALTICINAE) IN INDIA Rajendra Singh1*, Garima Singh2, Bindra Bihari Singh3 1Department of Zoology, Deendayal Upadhyay University of Gorakhpur (U.P.), India 2Department of Zoology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Rajasthan), India 3Department of Agricultural Entomology, Janta Mahavidyalaya, Ajitmal, Auraiya (U.P.), India *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received: 01.09.2020 Accepted: 30.09.2020 Published: 09.10.2020 Abstract: Distribution of spiders belonging to 4 tribes of clade Simonida (Salticinae: Salticidae: Araneae) reported in India is dealt. The tribe Aelurillini (7 genera, 27 species) is represented in 16 states and in 2 union territories, Euophryini (10 genera, 16 species) in 14 states and in 4 union territories, Leptorchestini (2 genera, 3 species) only in 2 union territories, Plexippini (22 genera, 73 species) in all states except Mizoram and in 3 union territories, and Salticini (3 genera, 11 species) in 15 states and in 4 union terrioties. West Bengal harbours maximum number of species, followed by Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra. Out of 129 species of the spiders listed, 70 species (54.3%) are endemic to India. Keywords: Aelurillini, Euophryini, India, Leptorchestini, Plexippini, Salticidae, Simonida. INTRODUCTION Hisponinae, Lyssomaninae, Onomastinae, Spiders are chelicerate arthropods belonging to Salticinae and Spartaeinae. Out of all the order Araneae of class Arachnida. Till to date subfamilies, Salticinae comprises 93.7% of the 48,804 described species under 4,180 genera and species (5818 species, 576 genera, including few 128 families (WSC, 2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Speculative Hunting by an Araneophagic Salticid Spider
    SPECULATIVE HUNTINGBY ANARANEOPHAGICSAL TICID SPIDER by ROBERT J.CLARK , DUANE P.HARLAND and ROBERT R.JACKSON 1,2) (Departmentof Zoology,University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand) (Acc.3-VII-2000) Summary Portia mbriata ,anaraneophagic jumping spider ( Salticidae),makes undirected leaps ( er- raticleaping with no particulartarget being evident) in the presence of chemicalcues from Jacksonoidesqueenslandicus ,anothersalticid and a commonprey of P. mbriata. Whether undirectedleaping by P. mbriata functionsas hunting by speculation is investigatedexperi- mentally.Our rsthypothesis, that undirected leaps provoke movement by J.queenslandicus , wasinvestigated using living P. mbriata andthree types of luresmade from dead, dry arthro- pods (P. mbriata, J.queenslandicus and Muscadomestica ).When a living P. mbriata made undirectedleaps or aspring-drivendevice made the lures suddenly move up and down, sim- ulatingundirected leaping, J.queenslandicus respondedby wavingits palps and starting to walk.There was no statisticalevidence that the species from which the lure was made in u- enced J.queenslandicus ’responsein these tests. Our second hypothesis, that J.queenslandi- cus revealsits location to P. mbriata bymoving, was investigated by recording P. mbriata’s reaction to J.queenslandicus when J.queenslandicus reactedto luressimulating undirected leaping.In these tests, P. mbriata respondedby turning toward J.queenslandicus and waving its palps. Keywords: Portia mbriata , Jacksonoidesqueenslandicus ,jumpingspiders, predation, spec- ulativehunting. 1) Correspondingauthor; e-mail address: [email protected] 2) WethankPhil T aylorand David Blest for useful discussion and valuable comments on the manuscript.Financial support was provided by theNational Science Foundation ( GrantBNS 861078)and the Marsden Fund of New Zealand(Grant UOC512). c KoninklijkeBrill NV ,Leiden,2000 Behaviour137, 1601-1612 ® 1602 CLARK, HARLAND&JACKSON Introduction Ageneralproblem facing predators is howto locate prey(Curio, 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Perception in Jumping Spiders (Araneae,Salticidae)
    Visual Perception in Jumping Spiders (Araneae,Salticidae) A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology at the University of Canterbury by Yinnon Dolev University of Canterbury 2016 Table of Contents Abstract.............................................................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................................... iii Preface ............................................................................................................................................................................. vi Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Innate pattern recognition and categorisation in a jumping Spider ........................................................... 9 Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Methods .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An International Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal for Rapid Publication
    VOLUME-12 NUMBER-4 (October-December 2019) Print ISSN: 0974-6455 Online ISSN: 2321-4007 CODEN: BBRCBA www.bbrc.in University Grants Commission (UGC) New Delhi, India Approved Journal An International Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal For Rapid Publication Published By: Society for Science & Nature (SSN) Bhopal India Indexed by Thomson Reuters, Now Clarivate Analytics USA ISI ESCI SJIF=4.186 Online Content Available: Every 3 Months at www.bbrc.in Registered with the Registrar of Newspapers for India under Reg. No. 498/2007 Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications VOLUME-12 NUMBER-4 (Oct-Dec 2019) Characteristics of Peptone from the Mackerel, Scomber japonicus Head by-Product as Bacterial Growth Media 829-836 Dwi Setijawati, Abdul A. Jaziri, Hefti S. Yufidasari, Dian W. Wardani, Mohammad D. Pratomo, Dinda Ersyah and Nurul Huda Endomycorrhizae Enhances Reciprocal Resource Exchange Via Membrane Protein Induction 837-843 Faten Dhawi Does Prediabetic State Affects Dental Implant Health? A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis 844-854 Khulud Abdulrahman Al-Aali An Updated Review on the Spiders of Order Araneae from the Districts of Western Ghats of India 855-864 Misal P. K, Bendre N. N, Pawar P. A, Bhoite S. H and Deshpande V. Y Synergetic Role of Endophytic Bacteria in Promoting Plant Growth and Exhibiting Antimicrobial 865-875 Mbarek Rahmoun and Bouri Amira Synergetic Role of Endophytic Bacteria in Promoting Plant Growth and Exhibiting 876-882 Antimicrobial Activities Bassam Oudh Al Johny Influence on Diabetic Pregnant Women with a Family History of Type 2 Diabetes 883-888 Sameera A. Al-Ghamdi Remediation of Cadmium Through Hyperaccumulator Plant, Solanum nigrum 889-893 Ihsan Ullah Biorefinery Sequential Extraction of Alginate by Conventional and Hydrothermal Fucoidan from the 894-903 Brown Alga, Sargassum cristaefolium Sugiono Sugiono and Doni Ferdiansyah Occupational Stress and Job Satisfaction in Prosthodontists working in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 904-911 Nawaf Labban, Sulieman S.
    [Show full text]
  • Predatory Behavior of Jumping Spiders
    Annual Reviews www.annualreviews.org/aronline Annu Rev. Entomol. 19%. 41:287-308 Copyrighl8 1996 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved PREDATORY BEHAVIOR OF JUMPING SPIDERS R. R. Jackson and S. D. Pollard Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand KEY WORDS: salticids, salticid eyes, Portia, predatory versatility, aggressive mimicry ABSTRACT Salticids, the largest family of spiders, have unique eyes, acute vision, and elaborate vision-mediated predatory behavior, which is more pronounced than in any other spider group. Diverse predatory strategies have evolved, including araneophagy,aggressive mimicry, myrmicophagy ,and prey-specific preycatch- ing behavior. Salticids are also distinctive for development of behavioral flexi- bility, including conditional predatory strategies, the use of trial-and-error to solve predatory problems, and the undertaking of detours to reach prey. Predatory behavior of araneophagic salticids has undergone local adaptation to local prey, and there is evidence of predator-prey coevolution. Trade-offs between mating and predatory strategies appear to be important in ant-mimicking and araneo- phagic species. INTRODUCTION With over 4000 described species (1 l), jumping spiders (Salticidae) compose by Fordham University on 04/13/13. For personal use only. the largest family of spiders. They are characterized as cursorial, diurnal predators with excellent eyesight. Although spider eyes usually lack the struc- tural complexity required for acute vision, salticids have unique, complex eyes with resolution abilities without known parallels in animals of comparable size Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1996.41:287-308. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org (98). Salticids are the end-product of an evolutionary process in which a small silk-producing animal with a simple nervous system acquires acute vision, resulting in a diverse array of complex predatory strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders of the Hawaiian Islands: Catalog and Bibliography1
    Pacific Insects 6 (4) : 665-687 December 30, 1964 SPIDERS OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS: CATALOG AND BIBLIOGRAPHY1 By Theodore W. Suman BISHOP MUSEUM, HONOLULU, HAWAII Abstract: This paper contains a systematic list of species, and the literature references, of the spiders occurring in the Hawaiian Islands. The species total 149 of which 17 are record­ ed here for the first time. This paper lists the records and literature of the spiders in the Hawaiian Islands. The islands included are Kure, Midway, Laysan, French Frigate Shoal, Kauai, Oahu, Molokai, Lanai, Maui and Hawaii. The only major work dealing with the spiders in the Hawaiian Is. was published 60 years ago in " Fauna Hawaiiensis " by Simon (1900 & 1904). All of the endemic spiders known today, except Pseudanapis aloha Forster, are described in that work which also in­ cludes a listing of several introduced species. The spider collection available to Simon re­ presented only a small part of the entire Hawaiian fauna. In all probability, the endemic species are only partly known. Since the appearance of Simon's work, there have been many new records and lists of introduced spiders. The known Hawaiian spider fauna now totals 149 species and 4 subspecies belonging to 21 families and 66 genera. Of this total, 82 species (5596) are believed to be endemic and belong to 10 families and 27 genera including 7 endemic genera. The introduced spe­ cies total 65 (44^). Two unidentified species placed in indigenous genera comprise the remaining \%. Seventeen species are recorded here for the first time. In the catalog section of this paper, families, genera and species are listed alphabetical­ ly for convenience.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Genera of Jumping Spiders from Hainan Island, China (Araneae, Salticidae)
    Zootaxa 3712 (1): 001–084 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3712.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:91ACA25B-A016-40ED-B105-3D9D960CA92E ZOOTAXA 3712 Two New Genera of Jumping Spiders from Hainan Island, China (Araneae, Salticidae) YUANYE ZHOU 1, 2 & SHUQIANG LI 1, 3 1Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China 2Liaoning Key Laboratory of Evolution and Biodiversity, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, China 3 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by T. Szuts: 8 Aug. 2013; published: 19 Sept. 2013 YUANYE ZHOU & SHUQIANG LI Two New Genera of Jumping Spiders from Hainan Island, China (Araneae, Salticidae) (Zootaxa 3712) 84 pp.; 30 cm. 19 Sept. 2013 ISBN 978-1-77557-262-6 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-263-3 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2013 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2013 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 3712 (1) © 2013 Magnolia Press ZHOU & LI Table of contents Abstract .
    [Show full text]
  • A Protocol for Online Documentation of Spider Biodiversity Inventories Applied to a Mexican Tropical Wet Forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae)
    Zootaxa 4722 (3): 241–269 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4722.3.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AC6E70B-6E6A-4D46-9C8A-2260B929E471 A protocol for online documentation of spider biodiversity inventories applied to a Mexican tropical wet forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae) FERNANDO ÁLVAREZ-PADILLA1, 2, M. ANTONIO GALÁN-SÁNCHEZ1 & F. JAVIER SALGUEIRO- SEPÚLVEDA1 1Laboratorio de Aracnología, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología Comparada, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Colonia Copilco el Bajo. C. P. 04510. Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. E-mail: [email protected] 2Corresponding author Abstract Spider community inventories have relatively well-established standardized collecting protocols. Such protocols set rules for the orderly acquisition of samples to estimate community parameters and to establish comparisons between areas. These methods have been tested worldwide, providing useful data for inventory planning and optimal sampling allocation efforts. The taxonomic counterpart of biodiversity inventories has received considerably less attention. Species lists and their relative abundances are the only link between the community parameters resulting from a biotic inventory and the biology of the species that live there. However, this connection is lost or speculative at best for species only partially identified (e. g., to genus but not to species). This link is particularly important for diverse tropical regions were many taxa are undescribed or little known such as spiders. One approach to this problem has been the development of biodiversity inventory websites that document the morphology of the species with digital images organized as standard views.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Non-Insect Invertebrates of Steele Creek Park
    Checklist of Non-Insect Invertebrates of Steele Creek Park Harvestmen (Order Opiliones) __ Leiobunum aldrichi __ Leiobunum vittatum (Eastern Harvestman) __ Odiellus nubivagus __ Odiellus pictus __ Vonones sayi (Ornate Harvestman) Centipedes (Class Chilopoda) __ Geophilus vittatus (Diamondback Soil Centipede) __ Hemiscolopendra marginata (Florida Blue Centipede, Eastern Bark Centipede) __ Scolopocryptops nigridius __ Scolopocryptops sexspinosus (Eastern Fire Centipede) __ Strigamia bothriopus __ Theatops posticus (Smooth-tailed Forceps Centipede) __ Cryptops leucopodus Millipedes (Class Diplopoda) __ Apheloria montana (Cherry Millipede) __ Brachycybe lecontii (Feather Millipede) __ Cambala annulata __ Oxidus gracilis (Greenhouse Millipede)* __ Pseudopolydesmus canadensis __ Abacion magnum __ Abacion tesselatum __ Euryurus leachii __ Andrognathus corticarius (Cope’s Noodle Millipede) __ Narceus americanus-annularis (American Giant Millipede) Spiders (Order Araneae) __ Agelenopsis sp. (Grass Spider) __ Araneus marmoreus (Marbled Orbweaver) __ Araniella displicata (Six-spotted Orbweaver) __ Dolomedes albineus (White-striped Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes tenebrosus (Dark Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes triton (Six-spotted Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes vittatus (Banded Fishing Spider) __ Larinioides cornutus (Furrow Orbweaver) __ Leucage venusta (Orchard Orbweaver) __ Micrathena gracilis (Spiny Micrathena) __ Micrathena mitrata (White Micrathena) __ Micrathena sagitatta (Arrow-shaped Micrathena) __ Misumenoides formosipes (White-banded Crab Spider) __ Neoscona crucifera (Spotted Orbweaver) __ Phidippus audax (Bold Jumping Spider) __ Phidippus otiosus (Canopy Jumping Spider) __ Phidippus putnami (Putnam’s Jumping Spider) __ Platycryptus undatus (Tan Jumping Spider) __ Pardosa sp. (Thin-legged Wolf Spider) __ Pirata sp. (Pirate Wolf Spider) __ Rabidosa rabida (Rabid Wolf Spider) __ Schizocosa crassipes (Brush-footed Wolf Spider) __ Synema parvulum (Black-banded Crab Spider) __ Tetragnatha sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarantulas and Social Spiders
    Tarantulas and Social Spiders: A Tale of Sex and Silk by Jonathan Bull BSc (Hons) MSc ICL Thesis Presented to the Institute of Biology of The University of Nottingham in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Nottingham May 2012 DEDICATION To my parents… …because they both said to dedicate it to the other… I dedicate it to both ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisor Dr Sara Goodacre for her guidance and support. I am also hugely endebted to Dr Keith Spriggs who became my mentor in the field of RNA and without whom my understanding of the field would have been but a fraction of what it is now. Particular thanks go to Professor John Brookfield, an expert in the field of biological statistics and data retrieval. Likewise with Dr Susan Liddell for her proteomics assistance, a truly remarkable individual on par with Professor Brookfield in being able to simplify even the most complex techniques and analyses. Finally, I would really like to thank Janet Beccaloni for her time and resources at the Natural History Museum, London, permitting me access to the collections therein; ten years on and still a delight. Finally, amongst the greats, Alexander ‘Sasha’ Kondrashov… a true inspiration. I would also like to express my gratitude to those who, although may not have directly contributed, should not be forgotten due to their continued assistance and considerate nature: Dr Chris Wade (five straight hours of help was not uncommon!), Sue Buxton (direct to my bench creepy crawlies), Sheila Keeble (ventures and cleans where others dare not), Alice Young (read/checked my thesis and overcame her arachnophobia!) and all those in the Centre for Biomolecular Sciences.
    [Show full text]