DOCSLIB.ORG

Decision Granting in Part Prosecution's Motions for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts Pursuant to Rule 94(B)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ir:O{)-Q1- r j) -64 -"IS" - !J b314 UNITED 01 1rP1V~ .tOIO NATIONS International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Case No: IT-08-91-T Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 1 April 2010 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN TRIAL CHAMBER 11 Before: Judge Burton Hall, Presiding Judge Guy Delvoie Judge Frederik Harhoff Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Decision of: 1 April 2010 PROSECUTOR v. MICO STANISIC AND STOJANZUPLJANIN PUBLIC DECISION GRANTING IN PART PROSECUTION'S MOTIONS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE OF ADJUDICATED FACTS PURSUANT TO RULE 94(B) The Office of the Prosecutor Ms. Joanna Korner Mr. Thomas Hannis Counsel for the Accused Mr. Slobodan Zecevic and Mr. Slobodan Cvijetic for Mico Stanisic Mr. Igor Pantelic and Mr. Dragan Krgovic for Stojan Z:upljanin TRIAL CHAMBER 11 ("Trial Chamber") of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 ("Tribunal") is seised of the following motions: (i) "Prosecution's third motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, with annex", filed on 25 January 2008 ("Third Motion"); (ii) "Prosecution's fourth motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, with annex", filed on 24 April 2008 ("Fourth Motion"); (iii) "Prosecution's request and notice regarding application of adjudicated facts to Stojan Zupljanin with annex", filed on 23 February 2009 ("Notice"); (iv) "Prosecution's fifth motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, with annex" filed on 21 August 2009 ("Fifth Motion"); and (v) "Prosecution's sixth motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, with annex" filed on 2 February 2010 ("Sixth Motion") (collectively, "Prosecution Motions for Judicial Notice"). I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1. On 14 December 2007, prior to the joinder of the cases against Mico Stanisic and Stojan Zupljanin, Trial Chamber II issued a "Decision on judicial notice" ("First Decision") deciding the following three motions: "Prosecution's motion for judicial notice of facts of common knowledge and adjudicated facts, with annex", filed on 31 August 2006 ("First Motion"), the "Defence motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts with annex", filed on 1 February 2007 ("Stanisic Defence Motion"), and the "Prosecution's second motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, with revised and consolidated annex", filed on 10 May 2007 ("Second Motion"). The Trial Chamber rejected the facts of common knowledge proposed by the Prosecution and took judicial notice of 853 of the adjudicated facts proposed by the Prosecution and the Defence of Mico Stanisic ("Stanisic Defence"). Case No. IT-08-91-T 2 1 April 2010 2. On 25 January 2008, the Prosecution filed the Third Motion, whereby it requests that the Trial Chamber take judicial notice of 59 proposed facts.! A further seven facts were proposed by the Prosecution in its Fourth Motion filed on 24 April 2008. On 8 February 2008, the Stanisic Defence responded to the Third Motion, requesting that the Trial Chamber deny judicial notice of all the 59 proposed facts. 2 The same request was made by the Stanisic Defence in its response filed 5 May 2008 in relation to the proposed seven facts in the Fourth Motion.3 3. On 23 September 2008, the Trial Chamber granted a Prosecution motion for joinder of the cases against Mico Stanisic and Stojan Zupljanin.4 On 23 February 2009, the Prosecution requested that the adjudicated facts of which the Trial Chamber took judicial notice in the First Decision be admissible as evidence against Stojan Zupljanin.5 The Prosecution also requested that the Third Motion and Fourth Motion apply to both Accused.6 4. On 31 March 2009, the Defence of Stojan Zupljanin ("Zupljanin Defence") replied to the Notice stating that it agreed to the admission of 161 proposed facts and requests the remaining proposed facts to be held inadmissible in the case against Stojan Zupljanin ("Zupljanin Response,,).7 On 7 April 2009, the Prosecution replied to the Zupljanin Response, requesting that the Trial Chamber reject the objections of the Zupljanin Defence. 8 The Chamber will grant leave to reply. 5. On 14 April 2009, the Zupljanin Defence filed the "Defence request for leave to respond and supplement to the response to Prosecution request and notice regarding application of adjudicated facts to Stojan Zupljanin" ("Supplemental Response"). The Trial Chamber notes that the Rules of Procedure and Evidence ("Rules") do not provide for rejoinders or "supplemental I The Trial Chamber notes that the Prosecution submits that there are 58 proposed facts. However, there are 59 proposed facts in the attached annex (Nos. 984-1042). 2 Defence response to prosecution's third motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, 8 Feb 2008 ("Stanisic Third Motion Response"), para. 11. J Defence response to Prosecution's fourth motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, with annex, 5 May 2008 ("Stanisic Fourth Motion Response"), para. 5. 4 Prosecutor v. StanisiG(, Case No. IT-04-79-PT and Prosecutor v. Stojan Zupljanin, Case No. IT-99-3 6/2-PT, Decision on Prosecution's motion for joinder and for leave to consolidate and amend indictments, 23 Sep 2008. S Notice, para. 8. Except as specified in paragraph 6 and Annex A of the Notice. 6 Notice, para. 8. 7 Defence request for leave to exceed the word limit and response to Prosecution request and notice regarding application of adjudicated facts to Stojan Zupljanin, 31 March 2009 ("Zupljanin Response"), para 30. The Zupljanin Response is timely because on 2 March 2009 the Zupljanin Defence filed "Stojan Zupljanin's Request for an extension of time to respond to the Prosecution's notice of 23 February 2009 regarding adjudicated facts" which requested an extension for filing a response until 1 May 2009. On 5 March 2009 the Prosecution filed "Prosecution response to Stojan Zupljanin's request for an extension of time to respond to the Prosecution's notice of 23 February 2009 regarding adjudicated facts" in which no objection to the extension' was raised. On 6 March 2009 the Trial Chamber issued an "Order regarding an extension of time for Stojan Zupljanin's response" which granted an extension until 1 April 2009, finding the original request by the Zupljanin Defence to be excessive. Further, the request to exceed the word limit is granted. Case No. IT-08-91-T 3 1 April 2010 responses". In the interest of the clarity of the record, however, it will consider the Supplemental Response only insofar as it addresses mistakes or errors in the Zupljanin Response. The Trial Chamber notes that this only concerns paragraph 4 of the filing, wherein the Zupljanin Defence withdraws in part its objection regarding proposed fact 877. 6. On 24 August 2009, the Prosecution filed the Fifth Motion requesting that the Trial Chamber take judicial notice of an additional 393 proposed facts. 9 On 7 September 2009, in separate responses, the Stanisic Defence and Zupljanin Defence both objected to the Fifth Motion in its entirety.lO On 14 September 2009, the Prosecution requested leave to reply and filed a reply whereby it requested the Trial Chamber to dismiss the Stanisic Defence and Zupljanin Defence responses. I I The Chamber will grant leave to reply. 7. On 2 February 2010, the Prosecution filed a further motion requesting the Trial Chamber to take judicial notice of 10 proposed facts ("Sixth Motion,,).12 The Stanisic Defence responded on 5 February 2010, opposing the Sixth Motion. 13 On 15 February 2010, the Zupljanin Defence joined the Stanisic response to the Sixth Motion. 14 11. SUBMISSIONS A. In respect of the Third Motion and the Fourth Motion 8. In the Third Motion, the Prosecution re-submits 41 proposed facts of which the Trial Chamber declined to take judicial notice in the First Decision, arguing that it has cured the defects found by the Trial Chamber. 15 Moreover, the Prosecution seeks judicial notice of 18 previously un submitted proposed facts. 16 The Prosecution argues that the proposed facts meet the nine criteria 8 Prosecution leave to reply and reply to Stojan Zupljanin's request for leave to exceed the word limit and response to Prosecution request and notice regarding application of adjudicated facts to Stojan Zupljanin, 8 April 2009, para. 25 . 9 Prosecution also filed a Corrigendum to the Prosecution's fifth motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, 16 Sep 2009, amending the word "none" to "nine" in proposed fact 1365. 10 Mr Mico StanisiC's response to the Prosecution's fifth motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, with annex, 7 Sep 2009 ("StaniSiC Fifth Motion Response"), para. 18; Defence request for leave to exceed the word limit and response to Prosecution's fifth motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, with annex, 7 Sep 2009 C"Zupljanin Fifth Motion Response"), para. 27. 11 Prosecution's motion for leave to reply and reply to Stanisic and Zupljanin responses to the Prosecution fifth motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, 14 Sep 2009 ("Reply"). 12 Prosecution's sixth motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, with annex, 2 Feb 2010. 13 Mr. Stanisic's response to the Prosecution's sixth motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, 5 Feb 2010 ("Stanisic Sixth Motion Response"). 14 Zupljanin submission joining the Stanisic response to Prosecution's sixth motion for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, 15 Feb 2010 C"Zupljanin Sixth Motion Response"). 15 Third Motion, para. 10. The 41 proposed facts are found in the attached annex to the Third Motion. The Trial Chamber notes that the inserted wording in brackets are used by the Prosecution for a better understanding of each fact standing alone. 16 Proposed facts 991, 1013-1029 in the attached annex to Third Motion.
Recommended publications
  • The Law Amending the Law on the Courts of The

    The Law Amending the Law on the Courts of The

    LAW AMENDING THE LAW ON COURTS OF THE REPUBLIKA SRPSKA Article 1 In the Law on Courts of the Republika Srpska (“Official Gazette of the Republika Srpska”, No: 37/12) in Article 26, paragraph 1, lines b), e), l) and nj) shall be amended to read as follows: “b) the Basic Court in Bijeljina, for the territory of the Bijeljina city, and Ugljevik and Lopare municipalities,”, “e) the Basic Court in Doboj, for the territory of Doboj city and Petrovo and Stanari municipalities,”, “l) the Basic Court in Prijedor, for the territory of Prijedor city, and Oštra Luka and Kozarska Dubica municipalities,” and “nj) the Basic Court in Trebinje, for the territory of Trebinje city, and Ljubinje, Berkovići, Bileća, Istočni Mostar, Nevesinje and Gacko municipalities,”. Article 2 In Article 28, in line g), after the wording: “of this Law” and comma punctuation mark, the word: “and” shall be deleted. In line d), after the wording: “of this Law”, the word: “and” shall be added as well as the new line đ) to read as follows: “đ) the District Court in Prijedor, for the territories covered by the Basic Courts in Prijedor and Novi Grad, and for the territory covered by the Basic Court in Kozarska Dubica in accordance with conditions from Article 99 of this Law.” Article 3 In Article 29, line g), after the wording: “the District Commercial Court in Trebinje”, the word: “and” shall be deleted and a comma punctuation mark shall be inserted. In line d), after the wording: “the District Commercial Court in East Sarajevo”, the word: “and” shall be added as well as the
  • Nijaz Ibrulj Faculty of Philosophy University of Sarajevo BOSNIA PORPHYRIANA an OUTLINE of the DEVELOPMENT of LOGIC in BOSNIA AN

    Nijaz Ibrulj Faculty of Philosophy University of Sarajevo BOSNIA PORPHYRIANA an OUTLINE of the DEVELOPMENT of LOGIC in BOSNIA AN

    UDK 16 (497.6) Nijaz Ibrulj Faculty of philosophy University of Sarajevo BOSNIA PORPHYRIANA AN OUTLINE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOGIC IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Abstract The text is a drought outlining the development of logic in Bosnia and Herzegovina through several periods of history: period of Ottoman occupation and administration of the Empire, period of Austro-Hungarian occupation and administration of the Monarchy, period of Communist regime and administration of the Socialist Republic and period from the aftermath of the aggression against the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina to this day (the Dayton Bosnia and Herzegovina) and administration of the International Community. For each of the aforementioned periods, the text treats the organization of education, the educational paradigm of the model, status of logic as a subject in the educational system of a period, as well as the central figures dealing with the issue of logic (as researchers, lecturers, authors) and the key works written in each of the periods, outlining their main ideas. The work of a Neoplatonic philosopher Porphyry, “Introduction” (Greek: Eijsagwgh;v Latin: Isagoge; Arabic: Īsāġūğī) , can be seen, in all periods of education in Bosnia and Herze - govina, as the main text, the principal textbook, as a motivation for logical thinking. That gave me the right to introduce the syntagm Bosnia Porphyriana. SURVEY 109 1. Introduction Man taman ṭaqa tazandaqa. He who practices logic becomes a heretic. 1 It would be impossible to elaborate the development of logic in Bosnia
  • Farmers Protest in Serbia: 'Most Fertile Land Is Given to Arabs'

    Farmers Protest in Serbia: 'Most Fertile Land Is Given to Arabs'

    Search HOME ABOUT EVENT S GALLERY PUBLISH SUBSCRIBE HELP English/all Farmers protest in Serbia: ‘Most fertile land is given to Liberia: Cease governmental Arabs’ surveillance and harassment against human rights advocates defending land Published: 28 Jul 2014 and natural resource rights. Send Short URL: http://farmlandgrab.org/23773 letter to President Sirleaf Posted in: Abu Dhabi | Serbia | UAE Comments (0) Print Email this Tell T IAA-CREF to go deforestation inSerbia | 28 July 2014 and land grab-free! Farmers protest in Serbia: ‘Most f ertile land is given to Arabs’ Who's involved? Farmers from villages and settlements of Sivac, Kruscic, Lipar and Crvenka in Vojvodina are outraged at the Ministry Select Category of Agriculture of Serbia, which leased more than 3,000 hectares of the best arable land to the company “Al Farmers from Kula, Serbia block the Rafaved” from the United Arab Emirates for 250 euros per center of the municipality with their Posts Comments hectare. tractors, demanding an explanation of what is behind the decision of the Recent posts They demand that Ministry explain why this fertile land has Ministry of Agriculture to lease 3,000 been exempted from the lease program based on the hectares of the best arable land to the Huile de palme : Greenpeace cible preferential rent, or why the state has not offered the land UAE company Al Rawafed under the most HSBC to them first, and then the Arabs. Farmers from Kula, at the favorable conditions. 17 Jan 2017 | No Comments protest rally in front of the local municipality building, said that it is inconceivable that Serbia leases the land to “Al Rafaved” for only 250 euros per hectare, Niger-Arabie Saoudite : des without public bidding.
  • European Social Charter the Government of Bosnia And

    European Social Charter the Government of Bosnia And

    16/06/2021 RAP/RCha/BIH/11 (2021) EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER 11th National Report on the implementation of the European Social Charter submitted by THE GOVERNMENT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Articles 11, 12, 13, 14 and 23 of the European Social Charter for the period 01/01/2016 – 31/12/2019 Report registered by the Secretariat on 16 June 2021 CYCLE 2021 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA MINISTRY OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND REFUGEES THE ELEVENTH REPORT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER /REVISED/ GROUP I: HEALTH, SOCIAL SECURITY AND SOCIAL PROTECTION ARTICLES 11, 12, 13, 14 AND 23 REFERENCE PERIOD: JANUARY 2016 - DECEMBER 2019 SARAJEVO, SEPTEMBER 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 3 II. ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ........... 4 III. GENERAL LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................................... 5 1. Bosnia and Herzegovina ............................................................................................... 5 2. Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina ....................................................................... 5 3. Republika Srpska ........................................................................................................... 9 4. Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina .............................................................. 10 IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF RATIFIED ESC/R/ PROVISIONS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ..............................................................................................
  • PRIKAZ/REVIEW Salih Jalimam, KULIN. VELIKI BAN BOSNE

    PRIKAZ/REVIEW Salih Jalimam, KULIN. VELIKI BAN BOSNE

    Adnan HADŽIABDIĆ Sarajevo E-mail: [email protected] Stručni rad/Professional article UDK/UDC:94:929(497.6)“1180/1204“ Jalimam S. (049.3) Salih Jalimam, KULIN. VELIKI BAN BOSNE, Udruženje za zaštitu intelektualnih i kulturnih vrijednosti „Zenica“, Zenica 2019, 249 str. Kao plod dugogodišnjeg rada i istraživanja prof. dr. Saliha Jalimama1, objavljena je knjiga Kulin, veliki ban Bosne. Čitav svoj život Jaliman je posvetio izučavanju historije Bosne i Hercegovine i kao plod svog dugogodišnjeg rada napisao je ovo kapitalno djelo kao sintezu svih dosadašnjih poznatih činjenica o vladavini Kulina, velikog bana Bosne, kako ga autor oslovljava u radu. VIEWS 3 POGLEDI 3 - HISTORICAL HISTORIJSKI Ovim autorskim radom Jalimam je planirao da zaokruži svoj naučno-istraživački rad, ali su ga ozbiljni zdravstveni problemi i smrt, 26. aprila 2019. godine spriječili da dočeka izlazak iz štampe ovog vrijednog naučnog rada. Knjiga Kulin, veliki ban Bosne nastala je prema raspoloživim historijskim izvorima, materijalnim spomenicima kulture i ostacima usmene predaje. Dokumenti, koji su malobrojni, ali i slabo i nedovoljno korišteni pomogli 1 Prof. dr. Salih Jalimam (1951-2019) poznati bosanskohercegovački historičar čije je polje naučnog rada bio srednji vijek. Radio je na više Univerziteta (Tuzli, Zenici, Mostaru). Objavio je preko 150 naučnih radova o Bosni i Hercegovini i preko stotinu prikaza, recenzija, osvrta i dr. Učesnik je mnogih međunarodnih naučnih skupova, simpozija i konferencija. 357 Adnan HADŽIABDIĆ su da se stvori pregled prilika u srednjovjekovnoj državi Bosni. Historijskom metodom interpetiraju se i identifikuju vrijeme vlasti i vladarske moći Kulina, ali se i istovremeno prate i historijski tokovi u susjednim državama i kompariraju sa događajima u bosanskoj državi.
  • Additional Pleading of the Republic of Croatia

    Additional Pleading of the Republic of Croatia

    international court of Justice case concerning the application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide (croatia v. serBia) ADDITIONAL PLEADING OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA anneXes volume 2 30 august 2012 international court of Justice case concerning the application of the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide (croatia v. serBia) ADDITIONAL PLEADING OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA anneXes volume 2 30 august 2012 ii iii CONTENTS annex 1: supreme martial court, ii K no. 111/92, 7 may 1992, decision 1 annex 2: photo of victims of vukovar, 18 november 1991, in the article by savo ©trbac, ZloËini nad Srbima na prostoru Hrvatske u periodu 1990-1999 [crimes against serbs on the territory of croatia in the period 1990-1999] 5 annex 3: official record of the statement made by a.a., 10 July 2012 6 annex 4: statement of 7 annex 5: statement of 9 annex 6: criminal complaint lodged by the independent associa- tion of Journalists in serbia with the office of the War crimes prosecutor, 1 July 2009 12 annex 7: programme statement of the management Board of radio television serbia, 23 may 2011 14 annex 8: peace initiative of the president of the republic of croatia, dr. franjo tuman, Zagreb, 1 november 1993 16 annex 9: record of the statement of i.B., 20 april 2012 19 annex 10: rsK, ministry of the interior, state security department, doc. no. 08/2-0-1224/95, Knin, 8 June 1995, with excerpt from the Weekly civilian affairs report 30 annex 11: un, coded cable from akashi to Kofi annan, meeting in Knin, 1 august 1995 32 annex 12: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by J.K., october 1995 39 annex 13: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by m.m., January 1996 40 annex 14: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by s.p., January 1996 42 annex 15: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by s.g., february 1996 43 annex 16: request for return to the republic of croatia filed by Æ.J., october 1995 44 annex 17: official note of the statement by d.–.
  • THE POSAVINA BORDER REGION of CROATIA and BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA: DEVELOPMENT up to 1918 (With Special Reference to Changes in Ethnic Composition)

    THE POSAVINA BORDER REGION of CROATIA and BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA: DEVELOPMENT up to 1918 (With Special Reference to Changes in Ethnic Composition)

    THE POSAVINA BORDER REGION OF CROATIA AND BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA: DEVELOPMENT UP TO 1918 (with special reference to changes in ethnic composition) Ivan CRKVEN^I] Zagreb UDK: 94(497.5-3 Posavina)''15/19'':323.1 Izvorni znanstveni rad Primljeno: 9. 9. 2003. After dealing with the natural features and social importance of the Posavina region in the past, presented is the importance of this region as a unique Croatian ethnic territory during the Mid- dle Ages. With the appearance of the Ottomans and especially at the beginning of the 16th century, great ethnic changes oc- cured, primarily due to the expulsion of Croats and arrival of new ethnic groups, mostly Orthodox Vlachs and later Muslims and ethnic Serbs. With the withdrawal of the Ottomans from the Pannonian basin to the areas south of the Sava River and the Danube, the Sava becomes the dividing line creating in its border areas two socially and politically different environments: the Slavonian Military Frontier on the Slavonian side and the Otto- man military-frontier system of kapitanates on the Bosnian side. Both systems had a special influence on the change of ethnic composition in this region. With the withdrawal of the Ottomans further towards the southeast of Europe and the Austrian occu- pation of Bosnia and Herzegovina the Sava River remains the border along which, especially on the Bosnian side, further changes of ethnic structure occured. Ivan Crkven~i}, Ilo~ka 34, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The research subject in this work is the border region Posavi- na between the Republic of Croatia and the Republic Bosnia- 293 -Herzegovina.
  • Jelena Mrgić-Radojčić Faculty of Philosophy Belgrade RETHINKING the TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT of the MEDIEVAL BOSNIAN STATE* In

    Jelena Mrgić-Radojčić Faculty of Philosophy Belgrade RETHINKING the TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT of the MEDIEVAL BOSNIAN STATE* In

    ИСТОРИЈСКИ ЧАСОПИС, књ. LI (2004) стр. 43-64 HISTORICAL REVIEW, Vol. LI (2004) pр. 43-64 УДК : 94(497.15) ”04/14” : 929 Jelena Mrgić-Radojčić Faculty of Philosophy Belgrade RETHINKING THE TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE MEDIEVAL BOSNIAN STATE* In many ways, the medieval Bosnian state developed at the cross- roads – between West and East, the Hungarian Kingdom, a predomi- nantly Western European state, and the Serbian Kingdom, under the strong influence of the Byzantine Empire. One may, without any further elaboration, say that Bosnia formed the periphery of both the Byzantine Empire, and Western Europe (first the Frankish and then the Hungarian state). Bosnia was far away from the most important communication line of the Balkans: the valleys of the rivers Morava and Vardar, Via militaris and also those of the rivers Ibar and Sitnica. The axis of the Bosnian state was the valley of the river Bosna, but not of the Drina ill suited for 1 communication with it steep banks and many canyons. * The author wishes to thank Prof. J. Koder, University of Vienna, Prof. S. Ćirković, Prof. M. Blagojević, and Prof. S. Mišić of Belgrade University for their usuful com- ments and corrections of the following text. 1J. Ferluga, Vizantiska uprava u Dalmaciji, (Byzantine Administration in Dalmatia), Beograd 1957; J. Koder, Der Lebensraum der Byzantiner. Historisch-geographischer Abriß ihres Mittelalterlichen Staates im östlichen Mittelmeerraum, Byzantische Geschichtsschreiber 1, Graz-Wien-Köln 1984, 20012, 13-21, passim; S. Ćirković, Bosna i Vizantija (Bosnia and Byzantium), Osam Stotina godina povelje bana Kulina, Sarajevo 1989, 23-35. Even though Bosnia was situated on the »cross-roads«, it is unacceptable to depict it as being “more of a no-man's-land than a meeting ground between the two worlds“, as J.V.A.
  • Deterring Wartime Atrocities Deterring Wartime Jacqueline R

    Deterring Wartime Atrocities Deterring Wartime Jacqueline R

    Deterring Wartime Atrocities Deterring Wartime Jacqueline R. Atrocities McAllister Hard Lessons from the Yugoslav Tribunal How can the interna- tional community deter government and rebel forces from committing atroc- ities against civilians? Long after liberated Nazi concentration camp survivors held up the ªrst sign declaring, “Never Again!” civilians have faced genocide during civil wars around the world, from Bangladesh to the former Yugoslavia, and more recently in northern Iraq. Sexual violence, torture, and forced dis- appearances are among the other horrors that civilians continue to endure in wartime. In the 1990s, international ofªcials sought to respond to such suffering by es- tablishing a new generation of wartime international criminal tribunals (ICTs), starting with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in 1993. The ICTY paved the way for the establishment of the perma- nent International Criminal Court (ICC) ªve years later. Unlike earlier ICTs in Nuremberg and Tokyo, as well as more recent war crimes tribunals in Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Cambodia, East Timor, Lebanon, Bosnia, and Kosovo, the ICTY and the ICC are mandated to prosecute international criminal law violations committed in the context of active armed conºicts. In granting the ICTY and the ICC such authority, their founders hoped that the tribu- nals would deter combatants in those conºicts from perpetrating violence against civilians.1 Nevertheless, more than twenty-ªve years after the ICTY opened its doors, international justice scholars continue to debate the role of wartime tribunals in deterring atrocities against civilians, particularly in ongoing conºicts. Skep- tics contend that, in the heat of battle, combatants are unlikely to perceive a Jacqueline R.
  • Croatia Atlas

    Croatia Atlas

    FF II CC SS SS Field Information and Capital Elevation Coordination Support Section (Above mean sea level) Division of Operational Services UNHCR Country Office Croatia / National Office 3,250 to 4,000 metres Sources: / Liaison Office 2,500 to 3,250 metres UNHCR, Global Insight digital mapping 1,750 to 2,500 metres © 1998 Europa Technologies Ltd. UNHCR Field Office As of December 2009 1,000 to 1,750 metres UNHCR Field Unit 750 to 1,000 metres The boundaries and names shown International boundary 500 to 750 metres and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement Main road 250 to 500 metres or acceptance by the United Nations. Secondary road 0 to 250 metres g Name_of_the_workspace.WOR !! Villach !! !! !! !! Below mean sea level !! !! Davograd Railway !! Marcali !! Orosháza !! Maribor !! Szank !! !! Cortina d'Ampezzo !! !! !! Mursko Sredisce !! Kalocsa!! Kecel !! Mindszent !! !! !! Kiskunmajsa !! !! Nagykanizsa !! Jesenice Tolna !! Kiskunhalas !! !! Ptuj !! !! Hajós !! !! Hódmezövásárhely!! !! !! !! Tolmezzo !! Böhönye !! !! !! !! !! !! Cakovec !! !! Sostanj !! !! !! Forraaskut !! !! Kaposvár !! !! Balotaszállás!! !! !! !! !! Mezöhe !! Varazdin HUNGARY!! !! Jánoshalma !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Legrad !! !! Ruzsa !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Gemona del Friuli !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Csurgó !! !! Szeged !! Kranj !! Celje !! Nagyatád !! !! !! Ivanec !! !! SLOVENIA !! !! !! Makó !! Durmanec !! Komló !! Maniago !! !! !! !! !! !! !! Koprivnica !! Baja !! Horgos !! Nadlac ! !! Belluno !!
  • Flood Disaster Situation Report 25Th May 2014

    Flood Disaster Situation Report 25Th May 2014

    United Nations / Ujedinjene nacije / Уједињене нације Office of the Resident Coordinator / Ured rezidentnog koordinatora / Уред резидентног координатора Bosnia and Herzegovina / Bosna i Hercegovina / Босна и Херцеговина Bosnia and Herzegovina – Flood Disaster Situation Report 25th May 2014 HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIORITIES: o Most water levels went down and water levels of Sava river basin are decreasing slowly, at a pace of less than 1cm / hour. o Mainly rural areas around Samac, Brcko, Orasje and Bijeljina are still covered with water; response activities ongoing and no life saving activities o Doboj, Olovo, Zavidovici, Zenica, Maglaj are intensively working on disinfection, sanitation, and cleaning o Around a 3,000 landslides have been reported. More than 1,000 landslides have been reported in Tuzla Canton alone. o Total number of reported casualties still cannot be confirmed (23 and in some reports up to 33) o Estimated 40,000 people have been displaced (ref. coordinators at Entity and District levels – shared through MoS Coordination Centre and the Red Cross). Estimated number of people in collective centers is between 2,600 and 3,000 o Elektroprivreda BiH reported that the electrical power grid is still severely affected in some areas (areas of Zenica-Doboj Canton, Doboj, Samac) and is being restored. o BH MAC reports that Doboj, Maglaj, Olovo, Una-Sana Canton and Posavina regions at the basin of Bosna, Krivaja and Usora rivers have so far been identified as mine and UXOs suspected areas: . Ammo depot in Orasje affected and presents a threat. BH MAC and UNDP are updating maps on mine locations. o Border crossing in Bosanski Samac, Brcko and Raca are still closed for traffic.
  • Jewish Citizens of Socialist Yugoslavia: Politics of Jewish Identity in a Socialist State, 1944-1974

    Jewish Citizens of Socialist Yugoslavia: Politics of Jewish Identity in a Socialist State, 1944-1974

    JEWISH CITIZENS OF SOCIALIST YUGOSLAVIA: POLITICS OF JEWISH IDENTITY IN A SOCIALIST STATE, 1944-1974 by Emil Kerenji A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Todd M. Endelman, Co-Chair Professor John V. Fine, Jr., Co-Chair Professor Zvi Y. Gitelman Professor Geoffrey H. Eley Associate Professor Brian A. Porter-Szűcs © Emil Kerenji 2008 Acknowledgments I would like to thank all those who supported me in a number of different and creative ways in the long and uncertain process of researching and writing a doctoral dissertation. First of all, I would like to thank John Fine and Todd Endelman, because of whom I came to Michigan in the first place. I thank them for their guidance and friendship. Geoff Eley, Zvi Gitelman, and Brian Porter have challenged me, each in their own ways, to push my thinking in different directions. My intellectual and academic development is equally indebted to my fellow Ph.D. students and friends I made during my life in Ann Arbor. Edin Hajdarpašić, Bhavani Raman, Olivera Jokić, Chandra Bhimull, Tijana Krstić, Natalie Rothman, Lenny Ureña, Marie Cruz, Juan Hernandez, Nita Luci, Ema Grama, Lisa Nichols, Ania Cichopek, Mary O’Reilly, Yasmeen Hanoosh, Frank Cody, Ed Murphy, Anna Mirkova are among them, not in any particular order. Doing research in the Balkans is sometimes a challenge, and many people helped me navigate the process creatively. At the Jewish Historical Museum in Belgrade, I would like to thank Milica Mihailović, Vojislava Radovanović, and Branka Džidić.