DOCSLIB.ORG

Asherah in the Hebrew Bible and Northwest Semitic Literature Author(S): John Day Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Asherah in the Hebrew Bible and Northwest Semitic Literature Author(S): John Day Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol Asherah in the Hebrew Bible and Northwest Semitic Literature Author(s): John Day Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 105, No. 3 (Sep., 1986), pp. 385-408 Published by: The Society of Biblical Literature Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3260509 . Accessed: 11/05/2013 22:44 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society of Biblical Literature is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Biblical Literature. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 143.207.2.50 on Sat, 11 May 2013 22:44:00 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions JBL 105/3 (1986) 385-408 ASHERAH IN THE HEBREW BIBLE AND NORTHWEST SEMITIC LITERATURE* JOHN DAY Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford University, England, OX2 6QA The late lamented Mitchell Dahood was noted for the use he made of the Ugaritic and other Northwest Semitic texts in the interpretation of the Hebrew Bible. Although many of his views are open to question, it is indisputable that the Ugaritic and other Northwest Semitic texts have revolutionized our understanding of the Bible. One matter in which this is certainly the case is the subject of this paper, Asherah.' Until the discovery of the Ugaritic texts in 1929 and subsequent years it was common for scholars to deny the very existence of the goddess Asherah, whether in or outside the Bible, and many of those who did accept her existence wrongly equated her with Astarte. Since the discovery of the Ugaritic texts, however, no one can deny that there was a Canaanite goddess Asherah, independent of Astarte, and it is generally accepted that this same goddess appears a number of times in the OT-though even today there are still a few scholars who refuse to face the facts, as we shall see below. In treating the subject of Asherah I shall discuss first Asherah in Northwest Semitic literature and then Asherah in the Hebrew Bible. I. Asherah in Northwest Semitic Literature The earliest references to the goddess Asherah are alleged to be in the Ebla texts (ca. 2350 B.c.), where P. Matthiae claims that she appears as a "lesser but well-attested" deity,2 but it should be noted that she does not *This essay was the winning entry in the SBEs 1984 Mitchell Dahood Memorial Prize Competition in Biblical Hebrew and Northwest Semitic, and a shortened form of it was delivered at the SBEs annual meeting in Chicago on 10 December 1984. The author wishes to express his gratitude to the competition committee (Professors F. M. Cross, P. D. Miller, M. H. Pope; secretary, Professor D. N. Freedman) for making the award, as well as to Double- day & Co., who provided the subvention. M. J. Dahood himself touched on various matters concerning the goddess Asherah in his essay "Ancient Semitic deities in Syria and Palestine," in Le antiche divinitd semitiche (ed. S. Moscati; Rome: Centro di Studi Semitici, 1958) 65-94 passim. 2 P. Matthiae, Ebla: An Empire Rediscovered (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1980) 187. See also G. Pettinato, "The Royal Archives of Tell-Mardikh-Ebla," BA 39 (1976) 48. It is sur- prising that Pettinato makes no mention of this in his book The Archives of Ebla (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1981). 385 This content downloaded from 143.207.2.50 on Sat, 11 May 2013 22:44:00 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 386 Journal of Biblical Literature appear in any of the texts published so far.3 Until such documentation exists, therefore, this claim needs to be treated with caution. In the second millennium B.C. we find the goddess under the name Asratum in cuneiform texts from the period of the first dynasty of Babylon (ca. 1830-1531 B.C.), where she appears as the consort of the god Amurru.4 Although these texts are in Akkadian rather than a Northwest Semitic language, they are of interest for our present purpose: it is likely that her cult was brought to Mesopotamia by the Amorites. She is usually called "the Lady of the steppe" (belet seri) and in an inscription dedicated to Asratum on behalf of Ham- murabi she is described as kallat sar sami "bride of the king of heaven" and belet kuzbi u ulsi "mistressof sexual vigor and rejoicing." Her name appears in old god lists but occurs only in one personal name, Asratum-ummi ("Asratum is my mother"). Two further items in Akkadian cuneiform deserve to be noted before we return to Northwest Semitic texts, since they relate to Palestine and Syria. The first is a text from Taanach, near Megiddo in northern Palestine, dating from the fifteenth century B.C., and addressed by Guli-Adad to Rewassa (previously read as Istar-wa-sur), the Prince of Taanach. Part of the tablet reads, "Further, and if there is a wizard of Asherah, let him tell our fortunes, and let me hear quickly (?); and the (oracular) sign and inter- pretation send to me." The reading "wizard of Asherah" (u-ma-an dA-si- rat) was suggested by W. F Albright, but F. Hrozny originally read "finger of Asherah" (u-ba-an d A-si-rat).5 Whichever reading is correct, the allusion is tantalizing: if Albright's rendering is correct the reference would call to mind the prophets of Asherah mentioned in 1 Kgs 18:19in the time of Ahab. The second item to be noted here concerns the king of Amurru named Abdi-Asirta "servant of Asirta" (Asherah), mentioned a number of times in the el-Amarna letters, dating from the first half of the fourteenth century B.C. The name is most often spelled abdi-a-si-ir-ta, but we also find abdi-a- si-ir-ti (te), abdi-as-ra-tum, abdi-asa-ra-tum, abdi-as-ra-ti, abdi-as-ra-ti, and abdi-as-ra-ta. 6Both the Taanach and el-Amarna tablets were discovered before the Ugaritic texts, but many scholars at that time refused to accept that they testified to the existence of a goddess Asherah. All this was changed with the discovery of the Ugaritic texts in 1929 and subsequently, to the 3 E.g., G. Pettinato, Catalogo dei testi cuneiformi di Tell Mardikh-Ebla (Naples: Istituto universitario orientale di Napoli, Seminario di Studi Asiatici, 1979) 267 contains no reference to Asherah in its list of divine names. 4 See P Jensen, "Die Gotter Amurru(d) und Asratu," ZA 11 (1896) 302-5; E. Ebeling, "Asratu,"Reallexikon der Assyriologie 1 (Berlin and Leipzig: de Gruyter, 1928) 169; J.-R. Kupper, L'iconographie du dieu Amurru dans la glyptique de la 1 re dynastie babylonienne (Brussels: Palais des Academies, 1961) 61-63, cf. 59, 68, 70, 85. 5 W. F. Albright, "A Prince of Taanach in the Fifteenth Century B.C.," BASOR 94 (1944) 18; F. Hrozny, "Keilschrifttexte von Ta'annek," in E. Sellin, Tell Ta'annek (Vienna: Carl Gerold's Sohn, 1904) 113-14. 6 See O. Weber in J. A. Knudtzon, Die El-Amarna-Tafeln 2 (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1915). This content downloaded from 143.207.2.50 on Sat, 11 May 2013 22:44:00 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Day: Asherah in the Hebrew Bible 387 discussion of which we must now turn. The Ugaritic texts from Ras Shamra on the Syrian coast, written in alphabetic cuneiform, are our single most important Northwest Semitic source about the goddess Asherah. She is there referred to as 'atrt, which is generally vocalized as Athirat, and appears as the consort of the supreme god El. As befits El's consort, she is sometimes called 'ilt (Elat), literally "goddess" (CTA 3.V.45, 14.IV.198, 15.III.26, etc.). She is the mother of the gods and as such is referred to as qnyt 'ilm "the procreatress of the gods" (see CTA 4.1.23, 4.III.26, 30, 32, 35, etc.). Less well known is a fragmentary text that refers to 'um. 'il [m ] "the mother of the gods" (PRU 11.2.43), which presumably also refers to Athirat. Athirat therefore shared at least to some extent in her consort El's work of creation. El is referred to as bny bnwt "creator of creatures" in the Ugaritic texts (see CTA 4.11.11,6.III.5, 17.1.25, etc.) and 'I qn 'rs "El creator of the earth" in other texts.7 The gods are referred to on one occasion as sb 'm. bn. 'atrt "the seventy sons of Athirat" (CTA 4.VI.46). It is not as widely appreciated as it should be that there is a direct line of connection between this concept and the later Jewish idea of the seventy guardian angels of the nations (see 1 Enoch 89:59; 90:22-25; Tg. Ps.-J. on Deut 32:8).8 Since the idea of the guardian angels of the nations clearly goes back to the concept expressed in Deut 32:8, whereby the Most High "fixed the bounds of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God,"9 and since the sons of God reflect the Canaanite idea of sons of El (bn 'il), there must surely be a direct connection with the seventy sons of Athirat referred to at Ugarit.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 15. Bible Marking
    LESSON FIFTEEN Hezekiah: The Challenge from Assyria Quote: “He trusted in the LORD God of Israel; so that after him was none like him among all the kings of Judah, nor any that were before him. For he clave to the LORD, and departed not from following him, but kept his commandments, which the LORD commanded Moses.” 2 Kings 18:5, 6 Bible Marking Hezekiah - 2 Kings 18 2 Kings 18:1 - “Hezekiah” - Means “strengthened of Yahweh”. It was only through Yahweh’s strength that the reformation was accomplished, that Hezekiah was healed, and that Assyria was defeated. So great was Hezekiah, that we are given 3 records of his life (Kings, Chronicles and Isaiah). A Reformation on Divine Principles Mark above & “Ahaz” - Means “possessor”, ie. a selfish man, below 2 Kg 18 who was Judah’s worst king Ahaz had given himself over to idolatry, following the examples of those who had left the truth (2 Chron 28:1-2), and 2 Kings 18:2 - “Abi” - The margin has - ‘Abijah, of the world in general (2 Kg 16:3, 10-11). He therefore made 2 Chron 29:1’. “Abijah” means “Yah is Father”. Judah “naked” in the sight of Yahweh, and “transgressed sore She appears to be the inspiration for Hezekiah to against Yahweh” (2 Chron 28:19). Now Hezekiah brought devote his life to the service of Yahweh. See about a reformation upon Divine principles. He turned the Prov 22:6. people back to Yahweh and His Word and to the Pioneers of “Zachariah” - Means “Yahweh hath remembered” the truth (David, Asaph and Gad and Nathan etc).
    [Show full text]
  • Idolatry in the Ancient Near East1
    Idolatry in the Ancient Near East1 Ancient Near Eastern Pantheons Ammonite Pantheon The chief god was Moloch/Molech/Milcom. Assyrian Pantheon The chief god was Asshur. Babylonian Pantheon At Lagash - Anu, the god of heaven and his wife Antu. At Eridu - Enlil, god of earth who was later succeeded by Marduk, and his wife Damkina. Marduk was their son. Other gods included: Sin, the moon god; Ningal, wife of Sin; Ishtar, the fertility goddess and her husband Tammuz; Allatu, goddess of the underworld ocean; Nabu, the patron of science/learning and Nusku, god of fire. Canaanite Pantheon The Canaanites borrowed heavily from the Assyrians. According to Ugaritic literature, the Canaanite pantheon was headed by El, the creator god, whose wife was Asherah. Their offspring were Baal, Anath (The OT indicates that Ashtoreth, a.k.a. Ishtar, was Baal’s wife), Mot & Ashtoreth. Dagon, Resheph, Shulman and Koshar were other gods of this pantheon. The cultic practices included animal sacrifices at high places; sacred groves, trees or carved wooden images of Asherah. Divination, snake worship and ritual prostitution were practiced. Sexual rites were supposed to ensure fertility of people, animals and lands. Edomite Pantheon The primary Edomite deity was Qos (a.k.a. Quas). Many Edomite personal names included Qos in the suffix much like YHWH is used in Hebrew names. Egyptian Pantheon2 Egyptian religion was never unified. Typically deities were prominent by locale. Only priests worshipped in the temples of the great gods and only when the gods were on parade did the populace get to worship them. These 'great gods' were treated like human kings by the priesthood: awakened in the morning with song; washed and dressed the image; served breakfast, lunch and dinner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship of Yahweh and El: a Study of Two Cults and Their Related Mythology
    Wyatt, Nicolas (1976) The relationship of Yahweh and El: a study of two cults and their related mythology. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/2160/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] .. ýýý,. The relationship of Yahweh and Ell. a study of two cults and their related mythology. Nicolas Wyatt ý; ý. A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy rin the " ®artänont of Ssbrwr and Semitic languages in the University of Glasgow. October 1976. ý ý . u.: ý. _, ý 1 I 'Preface .. tee.. This thesis is the result of work done in the Department of Hebrew and ': eraitia Langusgee, under the supervision of Professor John rdacdonald, during the period 1970-1976. No and part of It was done in collaboration, the views expressed are entirely my own. r. .e I should like to express my thanks to the followings Professor John Macdonald, for his assistance and encouragement; Dr. John Frye of the Univeritty`of the"Witwatersrandy who read parts of the thesis and offered comments and criticism; in and to my wife, whose task was hardest of all, that she typed the thesis, coping with the peculiarities of both my style and my handwriting.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Nisan / The Levantine Review Volume 4 Number 2 (Winter 2015) Identity and Peoples in History Speculating on Ancient Mediterranean Mysteries Mordechai Nisan* We are familiar with a philo-Semitic disposition characterizing a number of communities, including Phoenicians/Lebanese, Kabyles/Berbers, and Ismailis/Druze, raising the question of a historical foundation binding them all together. The ethnic threads began in the Galilee and Mount Lebanon and later conceivably wound themselves back there in the persona of Al-Muwahiddun [Unitarian] Druze. While DNA testing is a fascinating methodology to verify the similarity or identity of a shared gene pool among ostensibly disparate peoples, we will primarily pursue our inquiry using conventional historical materials, without however—at the end—avoiding the clues offered by modern science. Our thesis seeks to substantiate an intuition, a reading of the contours of tales emanating from the eastern Mediterranean basin, the Levantine area, to Africa and Egypt, and returning to Israel and Lebanon. The story unfolds with ancient biblical tribes of Israel in the north of their country mixing with, or becoming Lebanese Phoenicians, travelling to North Africa—Tunisia, Algeria, and Libya in particular— assimilating among Kabyle Berbers, later fusing with Shi’a Ismailis in the Maghreb, who would then migrate to Egypt, and during the Fatimid period evolve as the Druze. The latter would later flee Egypt and return to Lebanon—the place where their (biological) ancestors had once dwelt. The original core group was composed of Hebrews/Jews, toward whom various communities evince affinity and identity today with the Jewish people and the state of Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Yahweh and the Gods in the Old Testament • Yahve Et Les Dieux • Jahwe Und Die Gotter
    EuroJTh (1993) 2:2, 107-117 0960-2720 • Yahweh and the Gods in the Old Testament • Yahve et les dieux • Jahwe und die Gotter J. Gordon McConville, Oxford. RESUME L'article traite des exigences exclusives a l'egard par leur integration dans un nouveau contexte de Y ahve dans le contexte d'un milieu culturel canonique? Y a-t-il une 'affirmation' ou l'on partage bien des far;ons de penser qui, quelconque dans les fragments mythologiques jusqu'a uncertain point, ont une dimension qui sont ainsi integres? En general, la religieuse. L'auteur se demande jusqu'a quel dimension canonique est consideree comme point on a raison de considerer en termes decisive ( contre Barr et en nuanr;ant purement contradictoires la relation entre le Westermann). L'auteur essaie de le montrer Yahvisme et d'autres religions. Il aborde cette pour chacun des themes en question. question en etudiant les themes de la creation, La conclusion principale est que l'AT rejette de la presence de Dieu en Sion, et des noms de avec force les elements qui sont au coeur de la Dieu. religion cananeenne. Neanmoins, l'auteur Lorsque l'AT utilise le langage suggere de distinguer entre ['affirmation 'mythologique' pourparler de la creation, cela theologique et la suggestion religieuse. Le signifre-t-il qu'il accepte, d'une certain langage de Canaan, tel qu'il est employe dans maniere, les idees mythologiques? La question l'AT, conserve une partie de son pouvoir de a plusieurs aspects et peut etre abordee du point suggestion dans le domaine religieux.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apologetics of Tertullian by John
    Identity and Religion in Roman North Africa: the apologetics of Tertullian by John Elmer P. Abad A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy Graduate Department of Classics University of Toronto @ copyright by John Elmer Abad (2018) John Elmer Abad Doctor of Philosophy Department of Classics University of Toronto 2018 Abstract This dissertation examines the strategies employed by Tertullian in the construction and articulation of Christian identity in the pluralistic Roman North African society. The focus will be the apologetic works of Tertullian, the Ad Martyras, the Ad Nationes and the Apologeticum written around 197 A.D. Popular biases against Christians, the Romanizing tendencies of local elites in North Africa, the marginalization of sub-elites, the influence of cultural and intellectual revolution known as the Second Sophistic Movement, and the political ideologies and propaganda of emperor Septimius Severus – all these influenced Tertullian’s attempt to construct and articulate a Christian identity capable of engaging the ever changing socio- political landscape of North African at the dawn of the third century A.D. I shall examine select areas in antiquity where identities were explored, contested and projected namely, socio- cultural, religious, and political. I have identified four spheres which I refer to as “sites” of identity construction, namely paideia, the individual, community and “religion”. Chapter One provides a brief survey of the various contexts of Tertullian’s literary production. It includes a short description of the socio-political landscape during the reign of Emperor Septimius Severus, a brief history of Christianity in Roman North Africa, an introduction to the person of Tertullian, and his place within the “apologetic” tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SUPREMACY of BA'al OVER MOT in UGARITIC CYCLE of COSMOGONIC MYTHS and ITS INFLUENCE on the OLD TESTAMENT Interprets the Bi
    AJBT. Volume 21(6). February 9, 2020 THE SUPREMACY OF BA‘AL OVER MOT IN UGARITIC CYCLE OF COSMOGONIC MYTHS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THE OLD TESTAMENT Abstract The supremacy of Ba‘al over Mot in Ugaritic Cycle of Cosmogonic Myths was a prominent tradition within the world of the ancient Near East. This custom projects Ba‘al as the god of fertility and rain, but Mot as that of death and underworld. Since the world of the time was agrarian, most of the peoples involved in the worship of Ba‘al for bumper harvests but cast aspersion on Mot. The paper, therefore, claims that the incessant drifting away by ancient Israel from Yahweh for the worship of Ba‘al was on account of this cultural influence from the surrounding nations. The paper employed the canonical approach which interprets the biblical text in its canonical context, to analyse the influence of this type in the OT setting. In this direction, the writer examined ancient Ugarit from the perspective of archaeology. The paper also considered lexical analyses of the concepts of “Ba‘al” and “Mot” from the general worldview of the ancient world, especially within the cultural understanding of the people of Israel. The basis of this analysis was to identify possible supremacy of Ba‘al over Mot, the god of the dead. The writer finally investigated the possible areas of influence and the paper identified the following elements, namely, naming off some towns and cities after Ba‘al within the geographical locations of ancient Israel, worship of Ba‘al beginning from Israel’s contact with the Moabites in the wilderness and throughout the Judges and prevalence of Ba‘al worship during the United Kingdom and the time of Monarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • CLEAR II Egyptian Mythology and Religion Packet by Jeremy Hixson 1. According to Chapter 112 of the ​
    CLEAR II Egyptian Mythology and Religion Packet by Jeremy Hixson 1. According to Chapter 112 of the Book of the Dead, two of these deities were charged with ending a storm at the ​ ​ city of Pe, and the next chapter assigns the other two of these deities to the city of Nekhen. The Pyramid Texts describe these gods as bearing Osiris's body to the heavens and, in the Middle Kingdom, the names of these deities were placed on the corner pillars of coffins. Maarten Raven has argued that the association of these gods with the intestines developed later from their original function, as gods of the four quarters of the world. Isis was both their mother and grandmother. For 10 points, consisting of Qebehsenuef, Imsety, Duamutef, and Hapi, the protectors of the organs stored in the canopic jars which bear their heads, these are what group of deities, the progeny of a certain falcon­headed god? ANSWER: Sons of Horus [or Children of Horus; accept logical equivalents] ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 2. According to Plutarch, the pro­Spartan Kimon sent a delegation with a secret mission to this deity, though he died before its completion, prompting the priest to inform his men that Kimon was already with this deity. Pausanias says that Pindar offered a statue of this god carved by Kalamis in Thebes and Pythian IV includes Medea's prediction that "the daughter of Epaphus will one day be planted... amid the foundations" of this god in Libya. Every ten days a cult statue of this god was transported to Medinet Habu in western Thebes, where he had first created the world by fertilizing the world egg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Asherah Pole
    Christian Idolatry Then and Now: The Asherah Pole Author: Pierre Dungee www.getyouranswersonline.com In this short book, we are going to look at the Asherah pole. Just so we have a working knowledge of idolatry, let’s look at what and idol is defined as: noun 1. a material object, esp a carved image, that is worshipped as a god 2. Christianity Judaism any being (other than the one God) to which divine honour is paid 3. a person who is revered, admired, or highly loved We also have the origin of this word, so let’s take a look at it here: o mid-13c., "image of a deity as an object of (pagan) worship," o from Old French idole "idol, graven image, pagan god," o from Late Latin idolum "image (mental or physical), form," used in Church Latin for "false god," o from Greek eidolon "appearance, reflection in water or a mirror," later "mental image, apparition, phantom,"also "material image, statue," from eidos "form" (see - oid). o Figurative sense of "something idolized" is first recorded 1560s (in Middle English the figurative sense was "someone who is false or untrustworthy"). Meaning"a person so adored" is from 1590s. From the origins of the word, you see the words ‘pagan’, ‘false god’, ‘statue’, so we can correctly infer that and idol is NOT a good thing that a Christian should be looking at or dealing with. The Lord has given strict instructions about idols as you can see in scripture here: Leviticus 26:1 - Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it: for I am the LORD your God.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 97 – Covenant Renewed 2 Kings 23:1-37
    P a g e | 1 Third Presbyterian Church Tuesday Bible Study Old Testament Tour – 2 Kings 23 Lesson 97 – Covenant Renewed 2 Kings 23:1-37 (NIV) 1 Then the king called together all the elders of Judah and Jerusalem. 2 He went up to the temple of the LORD with the men of Judah, the people of Jerusalem, the priests and the prophets--all the people from the least to the greatest. He read in their hearing all the words of the Book of the Covenant, which had been found in the temple of the LORD. 3 The king stood by the pillar and renewed the covenant in the presence of the LORD--to follow the LORD and keep his commands, regulations and decrees with all his heart and all his soul, thus confirming the words of the covenant written in this book. Then all the people pledged themselves to the covenant. 4 The king ordered Hilkiah the high priest, the priests next in rank and the doorkeepers to remove from the temple of the LORD all the articles made for Baal and Asherah and all the starry hosts. He burned them outside Jerusalem in the fields of the Kidron Valley and took the ashes to Bethel. 5 He did away with the pagan priests appointed by the kings of Judah to burn incense on the high places of the towns of Judah and on those around Jerusalem--those who burned incense to Baal, to the sun and moon, to the constellations and to all the starry hosts. 6 He took the Asherah pole from the temple of the LORD to the Kidron Valley outside Jerusalem and burned it there.
    [Show full text]
  • Serpent Symbols and Salvation in the Ancient Near East and the Book of Mormon
    Journal of Book of Mormon Studies Volume 10 Number 2 Article 8 7-31-2001 Serpent Symbols and Salvation in the Ancient Near East and the Book of Mormon Andrew C. Skinner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Skinner, Andrew C. (2001) "Serpent Symbols and Salvation in the Ancient Near East and the Book of Mormon," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies: Vol. 10 : No. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms/vol10/iss2/8 This Feature Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Book of Mormon Studies by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Title Serpent Symbols and Salvation in the Ancient Near East and the Book of Mormon Author(s) Andrew C. Skinner Reference Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 10/2 (2001): 42–55, 70–71. ISSN 1065-9366 (print), 2168-3158 (online) Abstract The serpent is often used to represent one of two things: Christ or Satan. This article synthesizes evi- dence from Egypt, Mesopotamia, Phoenicia, Greece, and Jerusalem to explain the reason for this duality. Many scholars suggest that the symbol of the serpent was used anciently to represent Jesus Christ but that Satan distorted the symbol, thereby creating this para- dox. The dual nature of the serpent is incorporated into the Old Testament, the New Testament, and the Book of Mormon. erpent ymbols & SSalvation in the ancient near east and the book of mormon andrew c.
    [Show full text]
  • Dedications to Double Deities Syncretism Or Simply Syntax?
    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 27 | 2014 Varia Dedications to Double Deities Syncretism or simply syntax? Jenny Wallensten Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/2278 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.2278 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 November 2014 Number of pages: 159-176 ISBN: 978-2-87562-055-2 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Jenny Wallensten, « Dedications to Double Deities », Kernos [Online], 27 | 2014, Online since 01 October 2016, connection on 04 May 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/2278 ; DOI : 10.4000/ kernos.2278 This text was automatically generated on 4 May 2019. Kernos Dedications to Double Deities 1 Dedications to Double Deities Syncretism or simply syntax? Jenny Wallensten AUTHOR'S NOTE I wish to thank the participants in the Third International Martin P. Nilsson Workshop on Greek Religion, In Search of Syncretism, for their valuable comments during the discussions. I am especially grateful to Dr. Maria Mili and Prof. Robert Parker, who commented on the manuscript in previous stages. The comments of the anonymous Kernos reviewers considerably improved the article and I thank them sincerely. Composite deities and syncretism 1 Among the myriads of deities represented in the Greek epigraphic corpus can be found what might be called composite or double deities. These can initially be divided into two basic categories: firstly, non-cross-cultural composites gods such as Hera Aphrodite of Sparta or Zeus Ares of Arcadia1 and secondly, “international” multi-cultural combinations such as for example Isis Aphrodite.2 The present article focuses on three Delian votive inscriptions honouring gods of the latter category, where deities of different cultures are combined.3 In one instance, more than two gods seem to be juxtaposed, and all three cases include not only divine names, but also cult epithets.
    [Show full text]