DOCSLIB.ORG

CODEBOOK.Txt 2/16/2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UTEX0018_CODEBOOK.txt 2/16/2012 ============================================================================== == Project Code : UTEX0018 Project Name : Texas Tribune Prepared for : Jim Henson and Daron Shaw Interviews : 800 Field Period : 2/8/2012 - 2/15 /2012 Project Manager : Sam Luks - 650-462-8009 ============================================================================== == Matching and Weighting Polimetrix interviewed 909 respondents who were then matched down to a sample of 800 to produce the final dataset. The respondents were matched on gender , age , race , education , party identification , ideology and political interest. Polimetrix then weighted the matched set of survey respondents to known marginals for the registered voters of Texas from the 2008 Current Population survey and the 2007 Pew Religious Life Survey. Variable List ============================================================================== == Name Description ---- ----------- caseid Case ID weight Case Weight race Race hispanic Hispanic descent langpref Language Q1 Texas votereg birthyr Birth year gender Gender educ Education Q2 Political interest Q3 Texas Vote Freq Q4 Most Important Problem Q5 Most Important problem , Texas Q6 Retrospective Assessments , Obama Q7 Retrospective Assessments , Congress Q8 Rick Perry , Governor Q9 Country direction Q10 National Economy Q11 Texas direction Q12 Personal Econ Q13 Vote 2012 Q14 Republican Primary Q14A Republican Primary Force Q15 Republican Primary Satisfaction Q16_new Republican Primary Candidate Traits Q17 Republican Primary , Senator Q17A Republican Primary , Senator Force Q18 Republican Primary , Lieutenant Gov Q18A Republican Primary , Lieutenant Gov Force Q19 Democratic Primary , Senator Q19A Democratic Primary , Senator Force Q20 Gingrich v. Obama , President Q21 Romney v. Obama , President Q22 Santorum v. Obama , President Q23 Paul v. Obama , President Q24 Romney favorability Q25 Gingrich favorability Q26 Paul favorability Q27 Santorum favorability Q28 Obama favorability Q29 Perry favorability Q30 Vote Senator 2012 Q31 Perry Governor 1 UTEX0018_CODEBOOK.txt 2/16/2012 Q32 Tea Party popularity Q33 Tea Party influence Q34 Vote a Mormon Q35 Perry Texas image Q36 Candidate Preference - Race Q37 Candidate Preference - Issues Q38 Pathway to Citizenship Q39 Immigration Priority - Skills or Family Q40 Abortion Q41 Social Services Q42 Redistricting Q43 Gay Marriage Q44 Euthanization Q45 Death Penalty Q46 Jealous of the rich Q47 Rich pay fair share Q48 Wealth Causality MEDIA1_1 Media device - Tablets MEDIA1_2 Media device - Smartphones MEDIA2_1 Media frequency - Smartphone App MEDIA2_2 Media frequency - Search Engine MEDIA2_3 Media frequency - Social Network INFO1 House majority INFO2 Pres. veto INFO3 Comptroller of Public Accounts libcon Ideology pid7 7 point Party ID pid3 3 point party ID county_residence Texas county locate Community size metro Metropolitan area child Children faminc Family income relig Religion evang Evangelical catholic Catholic Identity literal Bible literal mormon Mormon Christian import Religion important attend Religion participation ancestry_1 Ancestry - English ancestry_2 Ancestry - French ancestry_3 Ancestry - German ancestry_4 Ancestry - Irish ancestry_5 Ancestry - Italian ancestry_6 Ancestry - Polish ancestry_7 Ancestry - Scottish ancestry_8 Ancestry - Swedish ancestry_9 Ancestry - American ancestry_10 Ancestry - Norwegian ancestry_11 Ancestry - Canadian ancestry_12 Ancestry - Spanish (Spain ) ancestry_13 Ancestry - Cuban ancestry_14 Ancestry - Puerto Rican ancestry_15 Ancestry - Dominican ancestry_16 Ancestry - El Salvadorian ancestry_17 Ancestry - Honduran ancestry_18 Ancestry - Guatemalan ancestry_19 Ancestry - Nicaraguan ancestry_20 Ancestry - Other Central America ancestry_21 Ancestry - South America ancestry_22 Ancestry - Other ancestry_23 Ancestry - Mexican race2 Hispanic-Latino grandparent native1 Born in USA native2 Parents place of birth home Homeowner 2 UTEX0018_CODEBOOK.txt 2/16/2012 marstat Marital Status P08 Voted 08 newsint News interest statefips statefips zipcode inputzip 3 UTEX0018_CODEBOOK.txt 2/16/2012 Variable Map and Codebook ============================================================================== == Name : caseid Description : Case ID ============================================================================== == Name : weight Description : Case Weight ============================================================================== == Name : race Description : Race Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 502 1 White / Blanco 99 2 Black 149 3 Hispanic 11 4 Asian 9 5 Native American / Americano indígena ó nativo 16 6 Mixed 11 7 Other 3 8 Middle Eastern / Del oriente medio 0 98 Skipped 0 99 Not Asked ============================================================================== == Name : hispanic Description : Hispanic descent Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 22 1 Yes 629 2 No 0 8 Skipped 149 9 Not Asked ============================================================================== == Name : langpref Description : Language Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 167 1 English / Inglés 4 2 Spanish / Español 0 8 Skipped 629 9 Not Asked ============================================================================== == Name : Q1 Description : Texas votereg Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 800 1 Yes , registered 0 2 No , not registered 0 3 Don 't know 0 8 Skipped 4 UTEX0018_CODEBOOK.txt 2/16/2012 0 9 Not Asked ============================================================================== == Name : birthyr Description : Birth year Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 0 9998 Skipped 0 9999 Not Asked ============================================================================== == Name : gender Description : Gender Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 374 1 Male 426 2 Female 0 8 Skipped 0 9 Not Asked ============================================================================== == Name : educ Description : Education Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 23 1 No HS 226 2 High school graduate 219 3 Some college 63 4 2-year 191 5 4-year 78 6 Post-grad 0 8 Skipped 0 9 Not Asked ============================================================================== == Name : Q2 Description : Political interest Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 465 1 Extremely interested 273 2 Somewhat interested 47 3 Not very interested 11 4 Not at all interested 4 5 Don 't know 0 8 Skipped 0 9 Not Asked ============================================================================== == Name : Q3 Description : Texas Vote Freq Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 275 1 Every election 318 2 Almost every election 88 3 About half 69 4 One or two 38 5 None 5 UTEX0018_CODEBOOK.txt 2/16/2012 12 6 Don 't know 0 8 Skipped 0 9 Not Asked ============================================================================== == Name : Q4 Description : Most Important Problem Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 228 1 The economy 89 2 Unemployment /jobs 150 3 Federal spending /national debt 95 4 Political corruption /leadership 29 5 Health care 38 6 Moral decline 8 7 National security /terrorism 19 8 Immigration 12 9 Taxes 19 10 Gas prices 2 11 Energy 5 12 Gay marriage 17 13 Education 11 14 Social welfare programs 7 15 Environment 4 16 The media 3 17 Abortion 3 18 Crime and drugs 1 19 Afghanistan /Pakistan 3 20 Housing 0 21 Iraq 0 22 Federal courts /nominees 1 23 Foreign trade 1 24 Voting system 4 25 Border security 23 26 Partisan gridlock 28 27 Income inequality 0 98 Skipped 0 99 Not Asked ============================================================================== == Name : Q5 Description : Most Important problem , Texas Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 116 1 Immigration 91 2 The economy 71 3 Unemployment /jobs 124 4 Border security 68 5 Political corruption /leadership 18 6 Health care 24 7 Gas prices 12 8 Crime and drugs 65 9 Education 21 10 State government spending 14 11 Moral decline 12 12 Taxes 16 13 Social welfare program 5 14 Insurance rates 28 15 Water supply 3 16 Gay marriage 8 17 Energy 4 18 Environment 7 19 Transportation /roads /traffic 6 UTEX0018_CODEBOOK.txt 2/16/2012 2 20 Abortion 4 21 Housing 1 22 State courts 0 23 The media 2 24 Voting system 31 25 State budget cuts 6 26 Utility rates 1 27 Electoral fraud 46 28 Redistricting 0 98 Skipped 0 99 Not Asked ============================================================================== == Name : Q6 Description : Retrospective Assessments , Obama Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 153 1 Approve strongly 157 2 Approve somewhat 36 3 Neither approve nor disapprove 50 4 Disapprove somewhat 400 5 Disapprove strongly 4 6 Don 't know 0 8 Skipped 0 9 Not Asked ============================================================================== == Name : Q7 Description : Retrospective Assessments , Congress Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 9 1 Approve strongly 71 2 Approve somewhat 104 3 Neither approve nor disapprove 210 4 Disapprove somewhat 394 5 Disapprove strongly 11 6 Don 't know 1 8 Skipped 0 9 Not Asked ============================================================================== == Name : Q8 Description : Rick Perry , Governor Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 96 1 Approve strongly 214 2 Approve somewhat 108 3 Neither approve nor disapprove 104 4 Disapprove somewhat 263 5 Disapprove strongly 14 6 Don 't know 1 8 Skipped 0 9 Not Asked ============================================================================== == Name : Q9 Description : Country direction Count Code Label ----- ---- ----- 7 UTEX0018_CODEBOOK.txt 2/16/2012 225 1 Right direction 493 2 Wrong track 80 3 Don
Recommended publications

  • Between Jamaica, Queens, and Williamsburg Bridge Plaza, Brooklyn

    Bus Timetable Effective as of September 1, 2019 New York City Transit Q54 Local Service a Between Jamaica, Queens, and Williamsburg Bridge Plaza, Brooklyn If you think your bus operator deserves an Apple Award — our special recognition for service, courtesy and professionalism — call 511 and give us the badge or bus number. Fares – MetroCard® is accepted for all MTA New York City trains (including Staten Island Railway - SIR), and, local, Limited-Stop and +SelectBusService buses (at MetroCard fare collection machines). Express buses only accept 7-Day Express Bus Plus MetroCard or Pay-Per-Ride MetroCard. All of our buses and +SelectBusService Coin Fare Collector machines accept exact fare in coins. Dollar bills, pennies, and half-dollar coins are not accepted. Free Transfers – Unlimited Ride MetroCard permits free transfers to all but our express buses (between subway and local bus, local bus and local bus etc.) Pay-Per-Ride MetroCard allows one free transfer of equal or lesser value if you complete your transfer within two hours of the time you pay your full fare with the same MetroCard. If you pay your local bus fare with coins, ask for a free electronic paper transfer to use on another local bus. Reduced-Fare Benefits – You are eligible for reduced-fare benefits if you are at least 65 years of age or have a qualifying disability. Benefits are available (except on peak-hour express buses) with proper identification, including Reduced-Fare MetroCard or Medicare card (Medicaid cards do not qualify). Children – The subway, SIR, local, Limited-Stop, and +SelectBusService buses permit up to three children, 44 inches tall and under to ride free when accompanied by an adult paying full fare.
  • HRS 2006 Self-Administered Psychosocial Questionnaire

    HRS 2006 Self-Administered Psychosocial Questionnaire

    Psychosocial and Lifestyle Questionnaire 2006 - 2010 Documentation Report Core Section LB Jacqui Smith, Gwenith Fisher, Lindsay Ryan, Philippa Clarke, Jim House and David Weir The HRS Psychosocial Working Group Survey Research Center Institute for Social Research University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan February 2013 1 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2004 Survey Methodology ............................................................................................................... 7 2006 Survey Methodology ............................................................................................................... 7 2008 Survey Methodology ............................................................................................................... 8 2010 Survey Methodology ............................................................................................................... 8 Weighting ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Special Methodological Issues to Consider .................................................................................... 9 Response Scales .............................................................................................................................
  • Ozone Park Howard Beach South Ozone Park

    Ozone Park Howard Beach South Ozone Park

    Neighborhood Map ¯ 106-99 t e 93-99 e r Captain Vincent G. Fowler 89-61 t 107 St 107 133 Avenue S 104-01 School, PS 108 94-01 3 96 Street 96 94-99 96-01 96-99 Street 97 97-01 98-99 109-99 0 1 110-01 106-12 133 Avenue 107-09 Sitka Street133-07 1 133 Avenue Rockaway Boulevard 91-01 13 Rosita Road 110-14 133-01 133 Avenue John Adams 109-52 Doxsey Place Playground 106 Street Q7 Street 108 104-99 134-14 89-99 109-51 Silver Road 92-25 Centreville Street 110 Street Q7 Street 109 133-99 133-13 Street 111 133-12 133-13 133-98 133-98 134-09 109-99 90-01 104-01 Rockaway 133-13 94-01 107 Street110-13 Gold Road 95-99 96-01 96-99 97-01 97-99 133-06 Boulevard 88 Street Desarc Road 133-00 134-36 134 Avenue 134 Avenue 107-01 88-99 Boss Street 96-14 104-10 109-99 110-99 111-16 Muriel Court Sitka Street134-35 Cross Bay 134-01 Sutter Avenue Boulevard 109-99 111 Avenue 134-11 105-99 107-12 134-99 132-00 107-99 Q37 134-12 94 Place 94 134-02 94-01 Place 95 134-25 134-24 95-23 Street 96 Q7 91-99 105-12 97 Street 97 Q37 90-01 Q Linden Blvd 37 134 Road Street Hawtree 105 Street 110-40 97-01 97-99 132-98 106-99 111-11 93-01 Q7 132-00 134 Road Q37 110-01 134-30 131-98 Q52 111-14 94-99 134-99 SBS 133-45 95-01 106-10 136-12 Q53 Linden Boulevard 134-24 Rockaway Boulevard 89-99 SBS Centreville Street Pitkin Avenue 95-99 134-99 106 Street 108 Street Q52 107-13 SBS 132-20 Sutter Avenue 110-99 Q11 94-14 96-01 136-15 90-99 Q53 Whitelaw Street Street Peconic Q21 SBS 132-00 135-01 134-99 133-98 134-98 110-52 90-01 Q41 d r 95-10 a Q11 v Q21 135-01 e l Q41 96-99 97-01 137-08 97-99 134-99 88-99 107 Street u o 96-10 Spritz Road 132-20 B 135-01 137-09 Linden Boulevard y a 89-01 135-26 90-99 B 96-38 94 Street 90-49 137-12 s Q52/Q53SBS 137-01 135-01 s 135-01 d 90-58 a Q52/Q53SBS o o r R 95 Street t C uc 135-25 A 135-26 d 96 Street e lb u e Aq rt R o 97-01 97-99 a 135-99 d Van Wicklen Rd 89-49 137-36 93-99 96 Place96 135 Road 135-99 94-13 137-01 135-99 Robert H.
  • An Algorithm to Measure Daily Bus Passenger Miles Using Electronic Farebox Data

    An Algorithm to Measure Daily Bus Passenger Miles Using Electronic Farebox Data

    An Algorithm to Measure Daily Bus Passenger Miles Using Electronic Farebox Data Alex Lu, Alla Reddy Operations Planning New York City Transit Authority Presented at the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D.C. (2011) T R A N S I T New York City Transit Notice: Opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official New York City Transit policy or position of Metropolitan Transportation Authority or MTA New YorkTRB City Transit. Paper #11-0368 Slide 1 Purpose and Need • Implement 100% electronic data reporting – Monthly “safety module” – Eliminates surveying, data entry, manual checking – More consistent & accurate • Algorithm requirements – Zero manual intervention – Fast: running time of a few minutes per day of data – Rely on schedules and AFC data (no GPS/AVL/APC) Photo: Adam E. Moreira New York City Transit TRB Paper #11-0368 Slide 2 NYCT’s MetroCard AFC Data • “Trip” file 73 bytes per record × about 8,000,000 bus and subway records per weekday = approximately 550 MB per weekday (3am to 2.59am next day) – partial trip records Hypothetical card with bus-only records shown: ....x....1....x....2....x....3....x....4....x....5....x....6....x....7. – no timestamps for 2653058017 20080416 55400 157 027 F02569 1 R482 0 362 2653058017 20080416 63000 157 027 F0027F 1 R480 0 494 cash transactions 2653058017 20080416 73600 157 027 F01E70 2 R494 0 153 2653058017 20080416 160000 157 027 F01E72 2 R494 0 152 2653058017 20080416 161800 157 027 F00214 1 R480 0 494 –
  • Right of Passage

    Right of Passage

    Right of Passage: Reducing Barriers to the Use of Public Transportation in the MTA Region Joshua L. Schank Transportation Planner April 2001 Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 (212) 878-7087 · www.pcac.org ã PCAC 2001 Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank the following people: Beverly Dolinsky and Mike Doyle of the PCAC staff, who provided extensive direction, input, and much needed help in researching this paper. They also helped to read and re-read several drafts, helped me to flush out arguments, and contributed in countless other ways to the final product. Stephen Dobrow of the New York City Transit Riders Council for his ideas and editorial assistance. Kate Schmidt, formerly of the PCAC staff, for some preliminary research for this paper. Barbara Spencer of New York City Transit, Christopher Boylan of the MTA, Brian Coons of Metro-North, and Yannis Takos of the Long Island Rail Road for their aid in providing data and information. The Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee and its component Councils–the Metro-North Railroad Commuter Council, the Long Island Rail Road Commuters Council, and the New York City Transit Riders Council–are the legislatively mandated representatives of the ridership of MTA bus, subway, and commuter-rail services. Our 38 volunteer members are regular users of the MTA system and are appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of County officials and, within New York City, of the Mayor, Public Advocate, and Borough Presidents. For more information on the PCAC and Councils, please visit our website: www.pcac.org.
  • HSIP Report Template Introduction Program Structure

    HSIP Report Template Introduction Program Structure

    HSIP Report Template May 2017 [Q1] State [Q2] Executive Summary Introduction Standard text Program Structure Program Administration [Q3] Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. [large text question] [Q4] Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? [Select one] Planning Operations Design Engineering Other [Q5 (old Q3)] How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? [Select one] Central Office via Statewide Competitive Application Process SHSP Emphasis Area Data Formula via Districts/Regions Formula via MPOs Other [Q6 (old Q4)] Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP. [large text question] [Q7 (old Q5)] Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) Bureaus, Divisions) are involved with HSIP planning. [Check all that apply] Traffic Engineering/Safety Design Planning Maintenance Operations Districts/Regions Local Aid Programs Office/Division Governors Highway Safety Office Other [Q8 (old Q6)] Describe coordination with internal partners. [large text question] 1 HSIP Report Template May 2017 [Q9 (old Q7)] Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning. [Check all that apply] Regional Planning Organizations (e.g. MPOs, RPOs, COGs) Governors Highway Safety Office Local Technical Assistance Program Local Government Agency Tribal Agency Law Enforcement Agency Academia/University FHWA Other [Q10] Describe coordination with external partners. [large text question] [Q11 (old Q8)] Have any program administration practices used to implement the HSIP changed since the last reporting period? [Yes/No dropdown] [If yes] Describe HSIP program administration practices that have changed since the last reporting period. [large text question] [Q12 (old Q9)] Are there any other any other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to elaborate? [Yes/No dropdown] [If yes] Describe other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to elaborate.
  • Improving Bus Service in New York a Thesis Presented to The

    Improving Bus Service in New York a Thesis Presented to The

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Columbia University Academic Commons Improving Bus Service in New York A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Architecture and Planning COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment Of the requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Urban Planning By Charles Romanow May 2018 Abstract New York City’s transportation system is in a state of disarray. City street are clogged with taxi’s and for-hire vehicles, subway platforms are packed with straphangers waiting for delayed trains and buses barely travel faster than pedestrians. The bureaucracy of City and State government in the region causes piecemeal improvements which do not keep up with the state of disrepair. Bus service is particularly poor, moving at rates incomparable with the rest of the country. New York has recently made successful efforts at improving bus speeds, but only so much can be done amidst a city of gridlock. Bus systems around the world faced similar challenges and successfully implemented improvements. A toolbox of near-immediate and long- term options are at New York’s disposal dealing directly with bus service as well indirect causes of poor bus service. The failing subway system has prompted public discussion concerning bus service. A significant cause of poor service in New York is congestion. A number of measures are capable of improving congestion and consequently, bus service. Due to the city’s limited capacity at implementing short-term solutions, the most highly problematic routes should receive priority. Routes with slow speeds, high rates of bunching and high ridership are concentrated in Manhattan and Downtown Brooklyn which also cater to the most subway riders.

  • Between Jamaica, Queens, and East New York, Brooklyn

    Bus Timetable Effective as of September 1, 2019 New York City Transit Q56 Local Service a Between Jamaica, Queens, and East New York, Brooklyn If you think your bus operator deserves an Apple Award — our special recognition for service, courtesy and professionalism — call 511 and give us the badge or bus number. Fares – MetroCard® is accepted for all MTA New York City trains (including Staten Island Railway - SIR), and, local, Limited-Stop and +SelectBusService buses (at MetroCard fare collection machines). Express buses only accept 7-Day Express Bus Plus MetroCard or Pay-Per-Ride MetroCard. All of our buses and +SelectBusService Coin Fare Collector machines accept exact fare in coins. Dollar bills, pennies, and half-dollar coins are not accepted. Free Transfers – Unlimited Ride MetroCard permits free transfers to all but our express buses (between subway and local bus, local bus and local bus etc.) Pay-Per-Ride MetroCard allows one free transfer of equal or lesser value if you complete your transfer within two hours of the time you pay your full fare with the same MetroCard. If you pay your local bus fare with coins, ask for a free electronic paper transfer to use on another local bus. Reduced-Fare Benefits – You are eligible for reduced-fare benefits if you are at least 65 years of age or have a qualifying disability. Benefits are available (except on peak-hour express buses) with proper identification, including Reduced-Fare MetroCard or Medicare card (Medicaid cards do not qualify). Children – The subway, SIR, local, Limited-Stop, and +SelectBusService buses permit up to three children, 44 inches tall and under to ride free when accompanied by an adult paying full fare.
  • A Pilot Study on High Intensity Functional Training in an Adaptive Population

    A Pilot Study on High Intensity Functional Training in an Adaptive Population

    A pilot study on high intensity functional training in an adaptive population by Victor Andrews B.S., Kansas State University, 2016 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH Department of Kinesiology College of Health and Human Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2019 Approved by: Major Professor Katie Heinrich Copyright © Victor Andrews 2019. Abstract Introduction: There are currently more than 56 million adults in the U.S. living with a disability that may affect activities of daily living and quality of life (QoL). Disabilities and chronic conditions may place impairments that limit participation in physical activity due to needing adaptations in order to be physically active. Physical activity is helpful in the prevention of secondary health conditions for those with an adaptive need. This pilot study investigated the effectiveness of adaptive high intensity function training (HIFT) for improving self-reported activity limitations and participation restrictions, QoL, sport/exercise beliefs, physical activity self-efficacy and enjoyment, and measured basic human movements (BHM). Methods: A two site pilot study was conducted using a single condition pre-test posttest design to provide an 8- week adaptive HIFT intervention to those with an adaptive need (e.g., cane, wheelchair). Eight participants (62.5% male, 37.5% White, 37.5% Black, 25% Hispanic/Latino, 100% with some college education or more) completed 2-3, 60-minute exercise sessions per week of high intensity, low volume workouts with trainers certified in adaptive HIFT. Participants completed online surveys including the World Health Organization QoL-BREF, the outpatient physical therapy improvement in movement assessment log (OPTIMAL), sport and exercise ability, and physical activity self-efficacy and enjoyment.
  • Community Survey Regional Community Transportation Needs Assessment

    Community Survey Regional Community Transportation Needs Assessment

    COMMUNITY SURVEY REGIONAL COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT MARCH 2017 Prepared By: TABLE OF CONTENTS Highlights ..........................................................................................................................................1 Overview ...........................................................................................................................................2 Sampling Approach ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Sampling Demographics ............................................................................................................................... 3 Park and Ride Services .......................................................................................................................6 Q3. Is Park and Ride Bus Service Located in Your Area? .............................................................................. 6 Q4. If yes, do you use Park and Ride service? .............................................................................................. 6 Q5. If yes, how often? .................................................................................................................................. 7 Q6. What are the primary strengths of Park and Ride service? .................................................................. 7 Q7. What are the main weaknesses of Park and Ride service? ................................................................... 9 Q8.
  • Representing All Hourly Rated Employees of the Queens Division, Who Safely Operate and Maintain Buses for MTA New York City Transit

    Representing All Hourly Rated Employees of the Queens Division, Who Safely Operate and Maintain Buses for MTA New York City Transit

    For Immediate Release: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 Contact: Corey Bearak (ATU 1056 Policy & Political Director) (718) 343-6779/ (516) 343-6207 ATU Local 1056 Makes Case to Make Queens Bus Service Whole Testimony to the New York City Council Committee on Transportation June 19, 2012 by I. Daneek Miller, President/ Business Agent, ATU Local 1056 On behalf of Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1056, thank you Chairman Vacca, members of the committees and other concerned Council Members present. I am ATU 1056 President and Business Agent I. Daneek Miller. My members and I appreciate this opportunity to outline the need to restore bus service outside Manhattan, where the City Department of Transportation focused on a number of initiatives in Midtown and along the East Side in particular. Our members – bus operators and mechanics – work for MTA New York City Transit's Queens bus division; we serve the riding public. Since the misguided and hurtful cuts to bus service in affecting any communities outside Manhattan, ATU Local 1056 has organized news conferences, rallies and other events with electeds and community leaders to urge the MTA to reverse harmful cuts and enlist Mayor Bloomberg in an effort where he remains largely silent. As many must recall, the mayor proposed private vans instead of the public bus service, and we all know how that went down; that dumb plan – another attempt at privatization – provided the Jay Walder-led MTA with some cover to refrain from looking at bus service restorations. We all know what happened: The MTA has refused to use the almost $100 million Federal stimulus funds (our tax dollars) it had available then to prevent cuts in service.
  • C037695 Commuter Bus Services QA 1-60

    C037695 Commuter Bus Services QA 1-60

    C037695 – Capital Region and Mid-Hudson Region Commuter Bus Services August 11, 2021 Questions #1-60 Q1. Please provide all bidders with the specific pricing sheet for this RFP, so that all prices are submitted with costs outlined in the same manner. Please provide such a pricing sheet in an electronic format. ANS: The RFP requires bidders to develop complete cost proposals as outlined in the RFP. This includes the development of a complete pricing sheet and supporting information to clearly describe the costs associated with the proposed turnkey commuter bus service. For the purposes of evaluation only Attachment #21 has been provided for proposers to complete and submit with Part II Cost and Administrative Proposal/Submittal. Attachment #21 is NOT to be included in Part I Technical and Management Proposal/Submittal. Q2. So that it is clear to all bidders, please confirm the volume of HOURS/TRIPS on which all bidders are expected to base their proposals. Are there any plans to change the volume of hours in the next 12 months? The next 24 months? ANS: The RFP requires bidders to provide a complete proposal for a state-of-the-art turnkey commuter bus services to be provided in the specified corridors including proposed hours and trips. It further specifies that schedules should include at least two daily a.m. and p.m. commuter options in each Commuter Transportation Corridor. The minimum will be the basis for providing an hourly rate price proposal. Bidders should account for fluctuations in service demands over time as a part of their proposal and should address how any fluctuating service needs of the traveling public will be managed/met for the duration of the resultant contract.