DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Survey Regional Community Transportation Needs Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Survey Regional Community Transportation Needs Assessment COMMUNITY SURVEY REGIONAL COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT MARCH 2017 Prepared By: TABLE OF CONTENTS Highlights ..........................................................................................................................................1 Overview ...........................................................................................................................................2 Sampling Approach ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Sampling Demographics ............................................................................................................................... 3 Park and Ride Services .......................................................................................................................6 Q3. Is Park and Ride Bus Service Located in Your Area? .............................................................................. 6 Q4. If yes, do you use Park and Ride service? .............................................................................................. 6 Q5. If yes, how often? .................................................................................................................................. 7 Q6. What are the primary strengths of Park and Ride service? .................................................................. 7 Q7. What are the main weaknesses of Park and Ride service? ................................................................... 9 Q8. What is the reason you do not use Park and Ride? ............................................................................ 10 Regular Bus (Fixed-Route) Services ................................................................................................... 16 Q9. Is regular bus (fixed route) service located in your area? ................................................................... 16 Q10. Do you use bus service? .................................................................................................................... 17 Q11. How often do you use bus service? ................................................................................................... 17 Q12. What are the primary strengths of regular bus service? .................................................................. 18 Q13. What are the main weaknesses of regular bus service? ................................................................... 19 Q14. What is the main reason you do not use bus service? ...................................................................... 21 Light Rail Services ............................................................................................................................ 25 Q15. Is light rail service located in your area? ........................................................................................... 25 Q16. If so, do you use it? ............................................................................................................................ 25 Q17. How often? ........................................................................................................................................ 26 Q18. What are the primary strengths of light rail service? ....................................................................... 26 Q19. What are the main weaknesses of light rail service? ........................................................................ 28 Q20. What is the reason you do not use light rail service? ....................................................................... 29 Carpool and Vanpool ....................................................................................................................... 31 Q21. Is carpooling or vanpooling something you use? .............................................................................. 31 Q22. Do you carpool, vanpool, or both? .................................................................................................... 31 Q23. How often do you carpool or vanpool? ............................................................................................. 32 Q24. What are the primary strengths of carpool/vanpool service? .......................................................... 32 Q25. What are the main weaknesses of carpool/vanpool service? .......................................................... 34 Q26. What is the reason you do not use carpool/vanpool service? .......................................................... 36 Bicycling and Walking ...................................................................................................................... 52 Q27. Do you walk or bicycle for any of your major life activities, such as work, shopping, or medical appointments? ........................................................................................................................................ 52 Q28. How often? ........................................................................................................................................ 52 Q29. What are the primary strengths of walking or cycling? .................................................................... 53 i Q30. What are the main weaknesses of walking or cycling? ..................................................................... 55 Q31. What would encourage you to bicycle or walk for major life activities? .......................................... 57 Unmet Community Transportation Needs / General Access .............................................................. 69 Q32. How often are you able to travel to your intended destination without difficulty? ........................ 69 Q33. How often do you have available public transportation to travel to your intended destination? ... 69 Q34. How often does the lack of available public transportation make it more difficult for you to travel to your intended destination? ................................................................................................................ 70 Q35. What prevents you or limits you from using public transportation? ................................................ 70 Q36. What would encourage you to use public transportation if you do not use it today? ..................... 79 Q37. What other means of travel besides public transportation are reasonably available to you? ......... 93 General Attitudes Toward Transit ................................................................................................... 100 Q38. Please choose one of the following terms to describe your overall attitude toward public transit services in the Houston-Galveston region: ........................................................................................... 100 Q39. Public transportation is valuable in reducing congestion and taking cars off the road in the Houston-Galveston region. ................................................................................................................... 101 Q40. Transit is valuable in reducing air pollution in the Houston-Galveston region. .............................. 102 Q41. Public transit should be provided to areas that lack transit services today. .................................. 103 Q42. Park and ride service to major employment centers should be provided where needed in the Houston-Galveston region. ................................................................................................................... 104 Q43. Fixed route (regular bus) service should be provided where needed in the Houston-Galveston region. ................................................................................................................................................... 105 Q44. Transit services should be provided to persons with disabilities and seniors where needed in the Houston-Galveston region. ................................................................................................................... 106 Q45. Do you strongly favor, somewhat favor, neither favor nor oppose, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose commuter (passenger suburban to city) rail service in the Houston-Galveston region? ........ 107 Q46. Would you use commuter rail service if it were convenient? ........................................................ 108 Funding Public Transit .................................................................................................................... 114 Q47. Additional local funding for transportation for persons with disabilities and seniors should be provided in the Houston-Galveston region. ......................................................................................... 114 Q48. Additional local funding for regular bus service should be provided in the Houston-Galveston region. ................................................................................................................................................... 115 Q49. Additional local funding for park and ride service to major employment centers should be provided in the Houston-Galveston region. ......................................................................................................... 116 Q50. Additional local funding for commuter rail service to major employment centers should be provided in the Houston-Galveston region. ......................................................................................... 117 Q51. In general, local funding should be provided for transit service in the Houston-Galveston
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HRS 2006 Self-Administered Psychosocial Questionnaire
    Psychosocial and Lifestyle Questionnaire 2006 - 2010 Documentation Report Core Section LB Jacqui Smith, Gwenith Fisher, Lindsay Ryan, Philippa Clarke, Jim House and David Weir The HRS Psychosocial Working Group Survey Research Center Institute for Social Research University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan February 2013 1 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2004 Survey Methodology ............................................................................................................... 7 2006 Survey Methodology ............................................................................................................... 7 2008 Survey Methodology ............................................................................................................... 8 2010 Survey Methodology ............................................................................................................... 8 Weighting ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Special Methodological Issues to Consider .................................................................................... 9 Response Scales .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Algorithm to Measure Daily Bus Passenger Miles Using Electronic Farebox Data
    An Algorithm to Measure Daily Bus Passenger Miles Using Electronic Farebox Data Alex Lu, Alla Reddy Operations Planning New York City Transit Authority Presented at the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D.C. (2011) T R A N S I T New York City Transit Notice: Opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official New York City Transit policy or position of Metropolitan Transportation Authority or MTA New YorkTRB City Transit. Paper #11-0368 Slide 1 Purpose and Need • Implement 100% electronic data reporting – Monthly “safety module” – Eliminates surveying, data entry, manual checking – More consistent & accurate • Algorithm requirements – Zero manual intervention – Fast: running time of a few minutes per day of data – Rely on schedules and AFC data (no GPS/AVL/APC) Photo: Adam E. Moreira New York City Transit TRB Paper #11-0368 Slide 2 NYCT’s MetroCard AFC Data • “Trip” file 73 bytes per record × about 8,000,000 bus and subway records per weekday = approximately 550 MB per weekday (3am to 2.59am next day) – partial trip records Hypothetical card with bus-only records shown: ....x....1....x....2....x....3....x....4....x....5....x....6....x....7. – no timestamps for 2653058017 20080416 55400 157 027 F02569 1 R482 0 362 2653058017 20080416 63000 157 027 F0027F 1 R480 0 494 cash transactions 2653058017 20080416 73600 157 027 F01E70 2 R494 0 153 2653058017 20080416 160000 157 027 F01E72 2 R494 0 152 2653058017 20080416 161800 157 027 F00214 1 R480 0 494 –
    [Show full text]
  • Right of Passage
    Right of Passage: Reducing Barriers to the Use of Public Transportation in the MTA Region Joshua L. Schank Transportation Planner April 2001 Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 (212) 878-7087 · www.pcac.org ã PCAC 2001 Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank the following people: Beverly Dolinsky and Mike Doyle of the PCAC staff, who provided extensive direction, input, and much needed help in researching this paper. They also helped to read and re-read several drafts, helped me to flush out arguments, and contributed in countless other ways to the final product. Stephen Dobrow of the New York City Transit Riders Council for his ideas and editorial assistance. Kate Schmidt, formerly of the PCAC staff, for some preliminary research for this paper. Barbara Spencer of New York City Transit, Christopher Boylan of the MTA, Brian Coons of Metro-North, and Yannis Takos of the Long Island Rail Road for their aid in providing data and information. The Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee and its component Councils–the Metro-North Railroad Commuter Council, the Long Island Rail Road Commuters Council, and the New York City Transit Riders Council–are the legislatively mandated representatives of the ridership of MTA bus, subway, and commuter-rail services. Our 38 volunteer members are regular users of the MTA system and are appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of County officials and, within New York City, of the Mayor, Public Advocate, and Borough Presidents. For more information on the PCAC and Councils, please visit our website: www.pcac.org.
    [Show full text]
  • CODE BLEU Thank You for Joining Us at Our Showcase This Evening
    PRESENTS… CODE BLEU Thank you for joining us at our showcase this evening. Tonight, we are featuring Code Bleu, led by Sean and Faith Gillen. Performing together for over twenty years, Code Bleu has become one of the most sought – after orchestras in New York. Code Bleu possesses a unique blend of fun, excitement and elegance that will leave your guests endlessly raving about your wedding. Featuring eight powerful lead vocalists, horns, keyboards, guitar, bass, drums and percussion, they can reproduce virtually any musical style. Code Bleu Members: • ELECTRIC, ACOUSTIC GUITARS, VOCALS………………………..………SEAN GILLEN • VOCALS AND MASTER OF CEREMONIES……..………………………….FAITH GILLEN • VOCALS AND KEYBOARDS..…………………………….……………………..RICH RIZZO • VOCALS AND PERCUSSION…………………………………......................SHELL LYNCH • KEYBOARDS AND VOCALS………………………………………..………….…DREW HILL • BASS……………………………………………………………………….….......DAVE ANTON • DRUMS AND SEQUENCING………………………………………………..JIM MANSFIELD • SAXOPHONE, VOCALS, FLUTE, AND GUITAR….……………ANTHONY POLICASTRO • VOCALS………………………………………………………………….…….PAMELA LEWIS • TRUMPET AND VOCALS……………….…………….………………….ALYSON GORDON www.skylineorchestras.com (631) 277 – 7777 #Skylineorchestras DANCE : BURNING DOWN THE HOUSE – Talking Heads BUST A MOVE – Young MC A GOOD NIGHT – John Legend CAKE BY THE OCEAN – DNCE A LITTLE LESS CONVERSATION – Elvis CALL ME MAYBE – Carly Rae Jepsen A LITTLE PARTY NEVER KILLED NOBODY – Fergie CAN’T FEEL MY FACE – The Weekend A LITTLE RESPECT – Erasure CAN’T GET ENOUGH OF YOUR LOVE – Barry White A PIRATE LOOKS AT 40 – Jimmy Buffet CAN’T GET YOU OUT OF MY HEAD – Kylie Minogue ABC – Jackson Five CAN’T HOLD US – Macklemore & Ryan Lewis ACCIDENTALLY IN LOVE – Counting Crows CAN’T HURRY LOVE – Supremes ACHY BREAKY HEART – Billy Ray Cyrus CAN’T STOP THE FEELING – Justin Timberlake ADDICTED TO YOU – Avicii CAR WASH – Rose Royce AEROPLANE – Red Hot Chili Peppers CASTLES IN THE SKY – Ian Van Dahl AIN’T IT FUN – Paramore CHEAP THRILLS – Sia feat.
    [Show full text]
  • Songs by Title
    Songs by Title Title Artist Title Artist #1 Goldfrapp (Medley) Can't Help Falling Elvis Presley John Legend In Love Nelly (Medley) It's Now Or Never Elvis Presley Pharrell Ft Kanye West (Medley) One Night Elvis Presley Skye Sweetnam (Medley) Rock & Roll Mike Denver Skye Sweetnam Christmas Tinchy Stryder Ft N Dubz (Medley) Such A Night Elvis Presley #1 Crush Garbage (Medley) Surrender Elvis Presley #1 Enemy Chipmunks Ft Daisy Dares (Medley) Suspicion Elvis Presley You (Medley) Teddy Bear Elvis Presley Daisy Dares You & (Olivia) Lost And Turned Whispers Chipmunk Out #1 Spot (TH) Ludacris (You Gotta) Fight For Your Richard Cheese #9 Dream John Lennon Right (To Party) & All That Jazz Catherine Zeta Jones +1 (Workout Mix) Martin Solveig & Sam White & Get Away Esquires 007 (Shanty Town) Desmond Dekker & I Ciara 03 Bonnie & Clyde Jay Z Ft Beyonce & I Am Telling You Im Not Jennifer Hudson Going 1 3 Dog Night & I Love Her Beatles Backstreet Boys & I Love You So Elvis Presley Chorus Line Hirley Bassey Creed Perry Como Faith Hill & If I Had Teddy Pendergrass HearSay & It Stoned Me Van Morrison Mary J Blige Ft U2 & Our Feelings Babyface Metallica & She Said Lucas Prata Tammy Wynette Ft George Jones & She Was Talking Heads Tyrese & So It Goes Billy Joel U2 & Still Reba McEntire U2 Ft Mary J Blige & The Angels Sing Barry Manilow 1 & 1 Robert Miles & The Beat Goes On Whispers 1 000 Times A Day Patty Loveless & The Cradle Will Rock Van Halen 1 2 I Love You Clay Walker & The Crowd Goes Wild Mark Wills 1 2 Step Ciara Ft Missy Elliott & The Grass Wont Pay
    [Show full text]
  • HSIP Report Template Introduction Program Structure
    HSIP Report Template May 2017 [Q1] State [Q2] Executive Summary Introduction Standard text Program Structure Program Administration [Q3] Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. [large text question] [Q4] Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? [Select one] Planning Operations Design Engineering Other [Q5 (old Q3)] How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? [Select one] Central Office via Statewide Competitive Application Process SHSP Emphasis Area Data Formula via Districts/Regions Formula via MPOs Other [Q6 (old Q4)] Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP. [large text question] [Q7 (old Q5)] Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) Bureaus, Divisions) are involved with HSIP planning. [Check all that apply] Traffic Engineering/Safety Design Planning Maintenance Operations Districts/Regions Local Aid Programs Office/Division Governors Highway Safety Office Other [Q8 (old Q6)] Describe coordination with internal partners. [large text question] 1 HSIP Report Template May 2017 [Q9 (old Q7)] Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning. [Check all that apply] Regional Planning Organizations (e.g. MPOs, RPOs, COGs) Governors Highway Safety Office Local Technical Assistance Program Local Government Agency Tribal Agency Law Enforcement Agency Academia/University FHWA Other [Q10] Describe coordination with external partners. [large text question] [Q11 (old Q8)] Have any program administration practices used to implement the HSIP changed since the last reporting period? [Yes/No dropdown] [If yes] Describe HSIP program administration practices that have changed since the last reporting period. [large text question] [Q12 (old Q9)] Are there any other any other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to elaborate? [Yes/No dropdown] [If yes] Describe other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to elaborate.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposing Corruption in Progressive Rock: a Semiotic Analysis of Gentle Giant’S the Power and the Glory
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Music Music 2019 EXPOSING CORRUPTION IN PROGRESSIVE ROCK: A SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF GENTLE GIANT’S THE POWER AND THE GLORY Robert Jacob Sivy University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2019.459 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Sivy, Robert Jacob, "EXPOSING CORRUPTION IN PROGRESSIVE ROCK: A SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF GENTLE GIANT’S THE POWER AND THE GLORY" (2019). Theses and Dissertations--Music. 149. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/music_etds/149 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Music at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Music by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Bus Service in New York a Thesis Presented to The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Columbia University Academic Commons Improving Bus Service in New York A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Architecture and Planning COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment Of the requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Urban Planning By Charles Romanow May 2018 Abstract New York City’s transportation system is in a state of disarray. City street are clogged with taxi’s and for-hire vehicles, subway platforms are packed with straphangers waiting for delayed trains and buses barely travel faster than pedestrians. The bureaucracy of City and State government in the region causes piecemeal improvements which do not keep up with the state of disrepair. Bus service is particularly poor, moving at rates incomparable with the rest of the country. New York has recently made successful efforts at improving bus speeds, but only so much can be done amidst a city of gridlock. Bus systems around the world faced similar challenges and successfully implemented improvements. A toolbox of near-immediate and long- term options are at New York’s disposal dealing directly with bus service as well indirect causes of poor bus service. The failing subway system has prompted public discussion concerning bus service. A significant cause of poor service in New York is congestion. A number of measures are capable of improving congestion and consequently, bus service. Due to the city’s limited capacity at implementing short-term solutions, the most highly problematic routes should receive priority. Routes with slow speeds, high rates of bunching and high ridership are concentrated in Manhattan and Downtown Brooklyn which also cater to the most subway riders.
    [Show full text]
  • R. Frank Atwood: an Oral History
    R Frank Atwood R Frank R Frank Atwood An Oral History WSOHP Being in the eye of the hurricane is where you want to be There is no substitute for being in the leadership There just isnt You have much more ability to act and have influence on what you want to do When you are sitting on the sidelines in the rear ranksbeing in the rear ranks is not fun, unless you dont careif you just want the glory My first two years I was in the back seat, the total back seat You couldnt get any further back unless you were downstairs The next two years I was the whip! Now, I was starting to climb The next two years, I went to the floor leadership, and then I was floor leader for four years Then I went to the top gun, but once you get up there in the top three, its fun; its a lot better An Oral History Washington State Oral History Program Office of the Secretary of State R. Frank Atwood An Oral History Interviewed and Edited by Sharon Boswell Washington State Oral History Program Offi ce of the Secretary of State Sam Reed, Secretary of State Published 2003 Washington State Oral History Program All rights Reserved ISBN 1-889320-16-1 Library of Congress Subject Headings 1. Atwood, R. Frank, 1926-present 2. Legislators—Washington—biography 3. Washington—politics and government Washington State Oral History Program Offi ce of Secretary of State PO Box 40243 Olympia, WA 98504-0243 Telephone: (360) 704-7141 Dedicated to Marie and the kids, who were long-suffering through my eighteen years in public service.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pilot Study on High Intensity Functional Training in an Adaptive Population
    A pilot study on high intensity functional training in an adaptive population by Victor Andrews B.S., Kansas State University, 2016 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH Department of Kinesiology College of Health and Human Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2019 Approved by: Major Professor Katie Heinrich Copyright © Victor Andrews 2019. Abstract Introduction: There are currently more than 56 million adults in the U.S. living with a disability that may affect activities of daily living and quality of life (QoL). Disabilities and chronic conditions may place impairments that limit participation in physical activity due to needing adaptations in order to be physically active. Physical activity is helpful in the prevention of secondary health conditions for those with an adaptive need. This pilot study investigated the effectiveness of adaptive high intensity function training (HIFT) for improving self-reported activity limitations and participation restrictions, QoL, sport/exercise beliefs, physical activity self-efficacy and enjoyment, and measured basic human movements (BHM). Methods: A two site pilot study was conducted using a single condition pre-test posttest design to provide an 8- week adaptive HIFT intervention to those with an adaptive need (e.g., cane, wheelchair). Eight participants (62.5% male, 37.5% White, 37.5% Black, 25% Hispanic/Latino, 100% with some college education or more) completed 2-3, 60-minute exercise sessions per week of high intensity, low volume workouts with trainers certified in adaptive HIFT. Participants completed online surveys including the World Health Organization QoL-BREF, the outpatient physical therapy improvement in movement assessment log (OPTIMAL), sport and exercise ability, and physical activity self-efficacy and enjoyment.
    [Show full text]
  • Millennials Are Creating Unsafe Conditions on US Roads
    Economic Research: Millennials Are Creating Unsafe Conditions On U.S. Roads--But Not In The Way You Might Think Credit Market Services: Beth Ann Bovino, U.S. Chief Economist, New York (1) 212-438-1652; [email protected] Secondary Contact: Geoffrey E Buswick, Boston (1) 617-530-8311; [email protected] Table Of Contents Road To Nowhere (Baby, You Can) Drive My Car Little Deuce Coupe Freeway Of Love Go Your Own Way No Particular Place To Go I Can't Drive 55 WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT OCTOBER 19, 2015 1 1466580 | 302229998 Economic Research: Millennials Are Creating Unsafe Conditions On U.S. Roads--But Not In The Way You Might Think As banks, retailers, and consumer products companies continue their well-documented scramble to court so-called Millennials, the lifestyle choices of this newly adult generation are having a profound effect on a lesser-explored area of the U.S. economy: infrastructure. In the simplest terms, Millennials (which Pew Research defines as Americans born from 1982-2000, and called Generation Y by some) are driving less than older motorists did when they came of age--and when they do get behind the wheel, they are generally in smaller, more fuel-efficient cars. This, in turn, has curbed revenues from the federal gasoline tax, the primary source of funding for the Federal Highway Trust Fund, which is the backbone of the country's surface transportation infrastructure. This drop in funds available to construct and repair the country's infrastructure could, in Standard & Poor's Ratings Services' view, weigh on growth prospects for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles “Chaz” Bojórquez Interviewed by Karen Mary Davalos on September 25, 27, and 28, and October 2, 2007
    CSRC ORAL HISTORIES SERIES NO. 5, NOVEMBER 2013 CHARLES “CHAZ” BOJÓRQUEZ INTERVIEWED BY KAREN MARY DAVALOS ON SEPTEMBER 25, 27, AND 28, AND OCTOBER 2, 2007 Charles “Chaz” Bojórquez is a resident of Los Angeles. He grew up in East Los Angeles, where he developed his distinctive graffiti style. He received formal art training at Guadalajara University of Art in Mexico and California State University and Chouinard Art Institute in Los Angeles. Before devoting his time to painting, he worked as a commercial artist in the film and advertising industries. His work is represented in major private collections and museums, including the Smithsonian American Art Museum, the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles, and the De Young Museum in San Francisco. Karen Mary Davalos is chair and professor of Chicana/o studies at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles. Her research interests encompass representational practices, including art exhibition and collection; vernacular performance; spirituality; feminist scholarship and epistemologies; and oral history. Among her publications are Yolanda M. López (UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center Press, 2008); “The Mexican Museum of San Francisco: A Brief History with an Interpretive Analysis,” in The Mexican Museum of San Francisco Papers, 1971–2006 (UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center Press, 2010); and Exhibiting Mestizaje: Mexican (American) Museums in the Diaspora (University of New Mexico Press, 2001). This interview was conducted as part of the L.A. Xicano project. Preferred citation: Charles “Chaz” Bojórquez, interview with Karen Davalos, September 25, 27, and 28, and October 2, 2007, Los Angeles, California. CSRC Oral Histories Series, no. 5. Los Angeles: UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center Press, 2013.
    [Show full text]