DOCSLIB.ORG

Squadron Movements and Associated Transportation Problems: an Inner Look Into the Process

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Squadron Movements and Associated Transportation Problems: an Inner Look Into the Process View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2008-12 Squadron movements and associated transportation problems: an inner look into the process Hollis, William J. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/10308 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA MBA PROFESSIONAL REPORT Squadron Movements and Associated Transportation Problems: An Inner Look into the Process By: William J. Hollis Anthony S. Estep Nicholas T. Walker December 2008 Advisors: Geraldo Ferrer Aruna Apte Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2008 MBA Professional Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Squadron Movements and Associated Transportation 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Problems: An Inner Look into the Process N/A 6. AUTHOR(S) William J. Hollis, Anthony S. Estep, Nicholas T. Walker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER N/A Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited A 13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) The purpose of this MBA project is to explore the feasibility of prepositioning common aviation support equipment onboard aircraft carriers. When called upon to conduct shipboard operations, carrier-based squadrons are currently required to transport their common support equipment between their home station and their assigned aircraft carrier via commercially contracted trucks. The determination of prepositioning was made by conducting a cost- benefit analysis of purchasing additional support equipment versus the continuation of paying for contracted trucking. Additionally, the project investigates how the transportation funding program could be executed differently to better track funds and reduces current, questionable and unchallengeable charges. The project shows how proper scheduling of trucks for a carrier offload can prevent detention charges and assist in extending the taxpayer dollars from being used for non-value added activities. 14. SUBJECT TERMS Naval Aviation Enterprise, Distribution Network, Transportation Costs, 15. NUMBER OF Material Prepositioning, Inventory Management, Lean 6 Sigma, Detention Charges PAGES 115 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UU NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited SQUADRON MOVEMENTS AND ASSOCIATED MOVEMENT PROBLEMS: AN INNER LOOK INTO THE PROCESS William J. Hollis, Lieutenant Commander, United States Navy Anthony S. Estep, Lieutenant, United States Navy Nicholas T. Walker, Lieutenant, United States Navy Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION from the NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL December 2008 Authors: _____________________________________ LCDR William J. Hollis _____________________________________ LT Anthony S. Estep _____________________________________ LT Nicholas T. Walker Approved by: _____________________________________ Dr. Geraldo Ferrer, Lead Advisor _____________________________________ Dr. Aruna Apte, Support Advisor _____________________________________ Theresa N. Rea, CAPT, USN, Acting Dean Graduate School of Business and Public Policy iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv SQUADRON MOVEMENTS AND ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMS: AN INNER LOOK INTO THE PROCESS ABSTRACT The purpose of this MBA project is to explore the feasibility of prepositioning common aviation support equipment onboard aircraft carriers. When called upon to conduct shipboard operations, carrier-based squadrons are currently required to transport their common support equipment between their home station and their assigned aircraft carrier via commercially contracted trucks. The determination of prepositioning was made by conducting a cost-benefit analysis of purchasing additional support equipment versus the continuation of paying for contracted trucking. Additionally, the project investigates how the transportation funding program could be executed differently to better track funds and reduces current, questionable and unchallengeable charges. The project shows how proper scheduling of trucks for a carrier offload can prevent detention charges and assist in extending the taxpayer dollars from being used for non-value added activities. v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK vi TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 A. DEFINING THE ISSUES ...............................................................................3 B. OVERVIEW.....................................................................................................4 II. PROJECT BACKGROUND.......................................................................................7 A. SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT ..............................................................7 B. LEAN SIX SIGMA ..........................................................................................9 C. MILITARY EVOLUTION ...........................................................................10 D. PREPOSITIONING IN THE MILITARY..................................................12 E. INCREASE SPEED AND EFFICIENCY ...................................................13 III. SHIPPING COST FOR DETERMINING PREPOSITIONING ..........................15 A. FORMULAS...................................................................................................17 B. TRANSPORTATION....................................................................................18 C. INDIVIDUAL MATERIAL READINESS LIST........................................19 D. RETURN ON INVESTMENT......................................................................20 IV. PROBLEMS IN TRANSPORTATION FUNDING ...............................................23 A. TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNTING CODES/ LINE OF ACCOUNTING..............................................................................................23 B. RETENTION OF RECORDS, RECONCILIATION AND AUDITING .....................................................................................................24 C. PROGRAM MANAGER AND TRAINING ...............................................25 V. TRUCK SCHEDULING FOR REDUCED DETENTION CHARGES ...............27 A. DETENTION & SCHEDULING TRUCKS................................................27 B. SIMULATION ...............................................................................................28 VI. CONCLUSION ..........................................................................................................31 A. PREPOSITIONING ......................................................................................31 B. TRANSPORTATION FUNDING ALLOTMENT PROCESS..................31 C. TRUCK SCHEDULING PROCESS AND DETENTION CHARGES ....32 D. FURTHER RESEARCH...............................................................................33 APPENDIX A: REDUCED ENGINE TURN AROUND TIME........................................35 APPENDIX B: CHAIN FLOW OF TAC ............................................................................37 LIST OF REFERENCES......................................................................................................95 INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST .........................................................................................97 vii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Percentage of Average Transportation Costs for West Cost Carriers during FY05-FY08......................................................................................................16 Figure 2. Chart of Return on Investment Thresholds to Purchase 1 Complete Super Hornet IMRL Outfit.........................................................................................21 Figure 3. Current Approach to Conducting Business, Scenario 1...................................29 Figure 4. Proposed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iraq: Summary of U.S
    Order Code RL31763 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iraq: Summary of U.S. Forces Updated March 14, 2005 Linwood B. Carter Information Research Specialist Knowledge Services Group Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Iraq: Summary of U.S. Forces Summary This report provides a summary estimate of military forces that have reportedly been deployed to and subsequently withdrawn from the U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) Area of Responsibility (AOR), popularly called the Persian Gulf region, to support Operation Iraqi Freedom. For background information on the AOR, see [http://www.centcom.mil/aboutus/aor.htm]. Geographically, the USCENTCOM AOR stretches from the Horn of Africa to Central Asia. The information about military units that have been deployed and withdrawn is based on both official government public statements and estimates identified in selected news accounts. The statistics have been assembled from both Department of Defense (DOD) sources and open-source press reports. However, due to concerns about operational security, DOD is not routinely reporting the composition, size, or destination of units and military forces being deployed to the Persian Gulf. Consequently, not all has been officially confirmed. For further reading, see CRS Report RL31701, Iraq: U.S. Military Operations. This report will be updated as the situation continues to develop. Contents U.S. Forces.......................................................1 Military Units: Deployed/En Route/On Deployment Alert ..............1
    [Show full text]
  • Operation TOMODACHI: a Ten-Year Commemoration the Great East Japan Earthquake and Operation TOMODACHI – Speech by General Ryoichi Oriki (JGSDF, Ret.)
    Operation TOMODACHI: A Ten-Year Commemoration The Great East Japan Earthquake and Operation TOMODACHI – Speech by General Ryoichi Oriki (JGSDF, Ret.) Translated by Ms. Shiori Okazaki Good morning, everyone. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in today’s event with the Japan U.S. Military Program (JUMP), co-organized by the Embassy of Japan in the United States and Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA. I am grateful to see Ambassador Tomita, who just assumed his post; Dr. Akimoto; and Admiral Walsh, who served as the commander of Operation TOMODACHI. It has been ten years since the Great East Japan Earthquake, which was Japan’s greatest national crisis in recent years, resulting in many casualties. I would like to once again thank those who immediately extended their support after the disaster: the U.S. government, the American people, Ambassador Roos and the staff at the U.S. Embassy in Japan, and our many friends in the U.S. military who served on the ground during Operation TOMODACHI. The areas affected by the disaster are recovering, but there are still many issues to be addressed, including decommissioning the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. As recently as last month, on February 13, a 7.3 magnitude earthquake hit Fukushima and other areas, injuring more than 150 people. This was apparently an aftershock of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Major earthquakes like these are still a traumatic reminder of 10 years ago for many Japanese people—especially those in the areas affected by the disaster. 2 Translated by Ms. Shiori Okazaki The Great East Japan Earthquake was a complex disaster consisting of an earthquake, tsunami, and the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRING 2016 BANNER RECIPIENTS (Listed in Alphabetical Order by Last Name)
    SPRING 2016 BANNER RECIPIENTS (Listed in Alphabetical Order by Last Name) Click on name to view biography. Render Crayton Page 2 John Downey Page 3 John Galvin Page 4 Jonathan S. Gibson Page 5 Irving T. Gumb Page 6 Thomas B. Hayward Page 7 R. G. Head Page 8 Landon Jones Page 9 Charles Keating, IV Page 10 Fred J. Lukomski Page 11 John McCants Page 12 Paul F. McCarthy Page 13 Andy Mills Page 14 J. Moorhouse Page 15 Harold “Nate” Murphy Page 16 Pete Oswald Page 17 John “Jimmy” Thach Page 18 Render Crayton_ ______________ Render Crayton Written by Kevin Vienna In early 1966, while flying a combat mission over North Vietnam, Captain Render Crayton’s A4E Skyhawk was struck by anti-aircraft fire. The plane suffered crippling damage, with a resulting fire and explosion. Unable to maintain flight, Captain Crayton ejected over enemy territory. What happened next, though, demonstrates his character and heroism. While enemy troops quickly closed on his position, a search and rescue helicopter with armed escort arrived to attempt a pick up. Despite repeated efforts to clear the area of hostile fire, they were unsuccessful, and fuel ran low. Aware of this, and despite the grave personal danger, Captain Crayton selflessly directed them to depart, leading to his inevitable capture by the enemy. So began seven years of captivity as a prisoner of war. During this period, Captain Crayton provided superb leadership and guidance to fellow prisoners at several POW locations. Under the most adverse conditions, he resisted his captor’s efforts to break him, and he helped others maintain their resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Navy Training System Plan N88-Ntsp-A-50-8501B/D
    DRAFT NAVY TRAINING SYSTEM PLAN FOR THE AGM-65F IMAGING INFRARED MAVERICK MISSILE N88-NTSP-A-50-8501B/D MAY 1998 Enclosure (1) N88-NTSP-A-50-8501B/D AGM-65F IMAGING INFRARED MAVERICK MISSILE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Air Force is the Executive Service for development of the AGM-65 Maverick Missile System series. In October 1978, the Air Force began engineering development of the Air Force Imaging Infrared (IIR) Maverick AGM-65D, and in 1980 the Navy started development of the Navy AGM-65F IIR Maverick utilizing a modified IIR tracker from the Air Force AGM-65D Guidance and Control Section (GCS) and the Center-Aft Section (CAS) from the Navy AGM-65E. The AGM-65F IIR Maverick Missile is currently in the Operational Support Phase of the Weapon System Acquisition Process. The AGM-65F IIR Maverick Missile is designed primarily for use against targets requiring instantaneous or delayed blast fuzing for destruction of hardened ground and waterborne targets during day or night operations and in adverse weather conditions, with sufficient standoff range to permit limited exposures to terminal defenses. The IIR Maverick does not replace any weapons in the current inventory. The IIR Maverick does not affect current manning levels or existing Navy Enlisted Classification codes and Marine Corps Military Occupational Specialties. Manpower requirements at the organizational, intermediate, and depot level maintenance activities are based upon total workload requirements for a specific work center, and the skills needed to perform maintenance on the systems supported by that work center. The IIR Maverick operator training is provided at the appropriate Fleet Readiness Squadrons for P-3C pilot and Naval Flight Officer personnel, for F/A-18 pilot and Weapons System Officer personnel, and for AV-8B pilots.
    [Show full text]
  • Carl Vinson (CVN 70) in the Arabian Gulf, My Powerplants Work Center Was Knocking out and Fixing Whatever Discrepancies Came Our Way
    Page Left Intentionally Blank The Navy & Marine Corps Aviation Maintenance Safety Magazine Winter 2015, Volume 53 No. 2 RDML Christopher J. Murray, Commander, Naval Safety Center Col Glen Butler, USMC, Deputy Commander Features CMDCM(AW/SW) Paul Kingsbury, Command Master Chief Maggie Menzies , Head, Media and Public Affairs Department 2 When 3 out of 4 Is Bad Naval Safety Center (757) 444-3520 (DSN 564) Dial the following Lessons learned the hard way but second chances extensions any time during the greeting make it all good. Publications Fax (757) 444-6791 By AD3 Sean Landrum Mech Staff Nika Glover Editor-in-Chief [email protected] Ext. 7257 AMC Brian Bailey Associate Editor 4 Rushed a Checklist? Me? ...Never. [email protected] Ext. 7293 Perceived pressure to get the job done. Allan Amen Art Director By LCDR Jason Russo [email protected] Ext. 7248 John Williams Graphic Artist [email protected] Ext. 7254 6 MO’s Comments Analysts A message from CDR Tom Gibbons, Aviation CDR Thomas Gibbons Aircraft Maintenance and Material Division Head Maintenance Officer Naval Safety Center. [email protected] Ext. 7265 CW05 Daniel Kissel Avionics/ALSS Branch Head [email protected] Ext. 7278 7 Nothing to Stand On MGySgt William Potts System Maintenance Assistant Branch Head When reading is fundamental and procedures get [email protected] Ext. 7276 AMC Brian Bailey Airframes/Hydraulic bypassed. Danger! [email protected] Ext. 7285 by AT3 Grant Pick GySgt Robert Godwin Airframes [email protected] Ext. 7292 AMC Shana Goodman Airframes [email protected] Ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Exam Rate Name Command Short Title ABE1 AMETO YAOVI AZO
    Exam Rate Name Command Short Title ABE1 AMETO YAOVI AZO USS JOHN C STENNIS ABE1 FATTY MUTARR TRANSITPERSU PUGET SOUND WA ABE1 GONZALES BRIAN USS NIMITZ ABE1 GRANTHAM MASON USS DWIGHT D EISENHOWER ABE1 HO TRAN HUYNH B TRANSITPERSU PUGET SOUND WA ABE1 IVIE CASEY TERR NAS JACKSONVILLE FL ABE1 LAXAMANA KAMYLL USS GERALD R FORD CVN-78 ABE1 MORENO ALBERTO NAVCRUITDIST CHICAGO IL ABE1 ONEAL CHAMONE C PERSUPP DET NORTH ISLAND CA ABE1 PINTORE JOHN MA USS GEORGE H W BUSH ABE1 RIVERA MARIANI USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE1 ROMERO ESPERANZ NOSC SAN DIEGO CA ABE1 SANMIGUEL MICHA USS GEORGE H W BUSH ABE1 SANTOS ANGELA V USS CARL VINSON ABE2 ANTOINE BRODRIC PERSUPPDET KEY WEST FL ABE2 AUSTIN ARMANI V USS RONALD REAGAN ABE2 AYOUB FADI ZEYA USS CARL VINSON ABE2 BAKER KATHLEEN USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN ABE2 BARNABE ALEXAND USS RONALD REAGAN ABE2 BEATON TOWAANA USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN ABE2 BEDOYA NICOLE USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE2 BIRDPEREZ ZULYR HELICOPTER MINE COUNT SQ 12 VA ABE2 BLANCO FERNANDO USS GEORGE WASHINGTON ABE2 BRAMWELL ALEXAR USS HARRY S TRUMAN ABE2 CARBY TAVOY KAM PERSUPPDET KEY WEST FL ABE2 CARRANZA KEKOAK USS GEORGE WASHINGTON ABE2 CASTRO BENJAMIN USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE2 CIPRIANO IRICE USS NIMITZ ABE2 CONNER MATTHEW USS JOHN C STENNIS ABE2 DOVE JESSICA PA USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE2 DREXLER WILLIAM PERSUPP DET CHINA LAKE CA ABE2 DUDREY SARAH JO USS GEORGE H W BUSH ABE2 FERNANDEZ ROBER USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ABE2 GAL DANIEL USS GEORGE H W BUSH ABE2 GARCIA ALEXANDE NAS LEMOORE CA ABE2 GREENE DONOVAN USS RONALD REAGAN ABE2 HALL CASSIDY RA USS THEODORE
    [Show full text]
  • NAVY AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Cost-Effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-Powered Carriers
    United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Requesters August 1998 NAVY AIRCRAFT CARRIERS Cost-Effectiveness of Conventionally and Nuclear-Powered Carriers GAO/NSIAD-98-1 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-259298 August 27, 1998 The Honorable Ted Stevens Chairman The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Defense Committee on Appropriations United States Senate The Honorable C.W. Bill Young Chairman The Honorable John P. Murtha Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on National Security Committee on Appropriations House of Representatives The aircraft carrier forms the building block of the Navy’s forward deployed peacetime presence, crisis response, and war-fighting forces. The nuclear-powered carrier is the most expensive weapon system in the Nation’s arsenal and represents a significant portion of the Navy’s shipbuilding and conversion future years defense program. As requested, this report discusses the cost-effectiveness to the Navy of using conventionally and nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. As the Defense Department and the Navy assess design concepts for a new class of carriers, they will evaluate a number of factors, including different propulsion types. This report contains information and analysis that you may find useful in the process of allocating future defense resources. We are sending copies of this report to the Secretaries of Defense, Navy, Energy, and State and the Director, Office of Management and Budget. Copies will also be made available to others on request. Please contact me on (202) 512-3504 if you or your staff have any questions concerning this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Refueling and Complex Overhaul of the USS Nimitz (CVN 68) : Lessons for the Future / John F
    Refueling and Complex Overhaul of the (CVN 68) Lessons for the Future John F. Schank, Mark V. Arena, Denis Rushworth, John Birkler, James Chiesa R National Defense Research Institute The research described in this report was conducted for the U.S. Navy within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center of RAND’s National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center supported by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the unified commands, and the defense agencies under Contract DASW01-01-C-0004. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Planning and executing the refueling and complex overhaul of the USS Nimitz (CVN 68) : lessons for the future / John F. Schank ... [et al.]. p. cm. “MR-1632.” Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8330-3288-7 1. Nimitz (Ship : CVN-68) 2. Nuclear aircraft carriers—United States— Maintenance and repair. 3. Marine nuclear reactor plants—United States— Maintenance and repair. I. Schank, John F. (John Frederic), 1946– VA65.N625 P53 2002 359.9'4835—dc21 2002035781 Cover photo: USS Nimitz (CVN68), courtesy of Northrop Grumman Newport News, Mike Dillard, photographer. RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover design by Maritta Tapanainen © Copyright 2002 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND.
    [Show full text]
  • Captain Timothy J. Duening Vice-Commandant
    Captain Timothy J. Duening Vice-Commandant Captain Duening is a native of Eagle River, Wisconsin. He graduated from the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Physical Geography in 1984. He entered Aviation Officer Candidate School and was commissioned in July 1986. Immediately following commissioning, he began flight training and was designated a Flight Officer in October 1987. In May 1988, after completion of P-3 Fleet Replacement Squadron pilot training at Patrol Squadron THIRTY (VP-30) in Jacksonville, Florida, Captain Duening joined Patrol Squadron ELEVEN (VP-11) in Brunswick, Maine and subsequently completed deployments to Keflavik, Iceland and Sigonella, Sicily. During this tour he was designated a P-3C Patrol Plane Tactical Coordinator, Instructor TACCO and Mission Commander. In April of 1991, Captain Duening was ordered to Patrol Squadron THIRTY ONE (VP-31) as a Naval Flight Officer Instructor. Billets assigned during this tour included Public Affairs Officer, Schedules Officer and Assistant Operations Officer. In May 1993, Captain Duening joined the USS NIMITZ (CVN 68) as Catapult and Arresting Gear Officer. He reported aboard NIMITZ during a Western Pacific deployment to the Persian Gulf and served as Arresting Branch Officer, Bow and Waist Catapult Branch Officer and V-2 Division Officer. In May 1995, he received orders to Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California and subsequently earned a Masters of Science Degree in Management in the Manpower Systems Analysis curriculum. In October 1997, he returned to sea duty, joining the & ldquo Fighting Marlins& rdquo of Patrol Squadron FORTY (VP-40) while deployed to Misawa, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • WAR and PEACE in the HORNET Updated 0630/2016
    WAR and PEACE in the HORNET Updated 0630/2016 The Fist’s “marriage” with the CORSAIR II lasted just 15 years before transitioning to the F/A-18 Hornet. The Marines fielded their first Hornet squadron, VMFA-314, in January 1983. Some six months later, VFA-113 and VFA-25 were the first customers at VFA-125, the West Coast Hornet training squadron. The Fists received their first Hornet on 11 November, an important date in Fist History, and reported to CVW-14 in January 1984. As of 2012, the squadron has flown the Hornet longer than any other assigned aircraft (only 21 years in the SPAD). Editor: The following chronology is incomplete in some periods, pending access to additional command reports. Inputs are welcome: [email protected] CHRONOLOGY 1983 Commander in Chief - Ronald Reagan. 1 January The Squadron’s 40th birthday. 1 January VA-25 began the year serving under the command of Captain D. W. Baird, Commander, Carrier Air Wing Two, and under the operational control of Commodore D. B. Cargill, Commander Light Attack Wing, U. S. Pacific Fleet. 7 January The first F/A-18 Hornets entered operational service with VMFA-314, replacing that squadron’s F-4 Phantom II aircraft. 25 April CDR Steve L. WEBB relieved CDR R. W. LEONE as Commanding Officer. 2 May Lt. Leslie Provow, assigned to VRC-40, became the first woman designated a Landing Signal Officer (LSO). 11 May Fist of the Fleet was awarded the LTJG Bruce Carrier Memorial Award for excellence in Maintenance for CY1982. May The squadron provided six aircraft and ten pilots in support of the F-15 Fighter weapons School at Nellis AFB.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipbuilding Plan
    Report to Congress on the Annual Long-Range Plan for Construction of Naval Vessels Prepared by: Office of the Chief of Naval Operations Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (Warfighting Requirements and Capabilities - OPNAV N9) 2000 Navy Pentagon Washington, DC 20350-2000 Approved for Release by: Office of the Secretary of Defense December 9, 2020 The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $265,000 in Fiscal Years 2019 - 2020. This includes $20,000 in expenses and $245,000 in DoD labor. 2020Feb28 RefID: 2-295B307 Table of Contents I. Reporting Requirement ...........................................................................................3 II. Submission of the Report ........................................................................................3 III. Analytic Context .....................................................................................................3 IV. Fiscal Context .........................................................................................................3 V. Plan Objectives – Priorities ......................................................................................3 VI. Unmanned Systems ..................................................................................................4 VII. Industrial Base..........................................................................................................4 VIII. Shipbuilding Plan .....................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • USS Ronald Reagan SRA Completes On-Time USS Ronald Reagan SRA Completes On-Time
    May 30, 2019 ALUT Vol. XI No. 11 SPuget Sound Naval Shipyard & Intermediate MaintenanceE Facilityy USS Ronald Reagan SRA completes on-time Story on Page 3 Commander’s Corner Article start Commander’s leadership forum and key messages Team PSNS & IMF, I recently had the opportunity to attend • Training effectiveness: Making the best use the Commander’s Leadership Forum in of time to deliver the right training at the Washington, D.C., hosted by Vice Admiral right time to maximize our learning and Thomas Moore, Commander, Naval Sea resulting competency to do our work. Systems command. The two-day meeting Innovation: Embrace learning, critical thinking brought together all NAVSEA flag officers, and continuous improvement senior executive service members and • Innovation roadmap: Identify and remove commanding officers to align our mission hurdles to rapidly implement innovative and priorities in support of the Navy. I want ideas. to share with you some of the key messages • LEAN education: Reinvest in the LEAN discussed and how our efforts here in the knowledge of our workforce and the skills to northwest support both NAVSEA and Navy identify and eliminate waste in our work. Volume XI No. 11 priorities and ultimately our national security. • Rapid knowledge sharing: Share learning May 30, 2019 As political, economic and social climate Next issue: across our command and with our corporate June 12, 2019 continues to evolve around the world, partners to maximize the benefit of our best Deadline for submissions: NAVSEA’s mission to design, build, deliver and practices. June 13 - for the June 27 issue maintain ships and systems on time and on Commander Infrastructure: Develop and maintain a Captain Howard B.
    [Show full text]