DOCSLIB.ORG

WAR and PEACE in the HORNET Updated 0630/2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WAR and PEACE in the HORNET Updated 0630/2016 The Fist’s “marriage” with the CORSAIR II lasted just 15 years before transitioning to the F/A-18 Hornet. The Marines fielded their first Hornet squadron, VMFA-314, in January 1983. Some six months later, VFA-113 and VFA-25 were the first customers at VFA-125, the West Coast Hornet training squadron. The Fists received their first Hornet on 11 November, an important date in Fist History, and reported to CVW-14 in January 1984. As of 2012, the squadron has flown the Hornet longer than any other assigned aircraft (only 21 years in the SPAD). Editor: The following chronology is incomplete in some periods, pending access to additional command reports. Inputs are welcome: [email protected] CHRONOLOGY 1983 Commander in Chief - Ronald Reagan. 1 January The Squadron’s 40th birthday. 1 January VA-25 began the year serving under the command of Captain D. W. Baird, Commander, Carrier Air Wing Two, and under the operational control of Commodore D. B. Cargill, Commander Light Attack Wing, U. S. Pacific Fleet. 7 January The first F/A-18 Hornets entered operational service with VMFA-314, replacing that squadron’s F-4 Phantom II aircraft. 25 April CDR Steve L. WEBB relieved CDR R. W. LEONE as Commanding Officer. 2 May Lt. Leslie Provow, assigned to VRC-40, became the first woman designated a Landing Signal Officer (LSO). 11 May Fist of the Fleet was awarded the LTJG Bruce Carrier Memorial Award for excellence in Maintenance for CY1982. May The squadron provided six aircraft and ten pilots in support of the F-15 Fighter weapons School at Nellis AFB. 10 June Lt. Colleen Nevius became the first woman to graduate from the US Navy Test Pilot School at Patuxent River. 23 June The squadron achieved 7 years and surpassed 31,500 of mishap-free operations. 30 June All the squadron’s A-7Es were transferred and the first six pilot began training in VFA-125. 1 July VA-25 became Strike Fighter Squadron Twenty Five (VFA-25), during a ceremony attended by Commodore Cargill. 9 September Captain John J. “Swede” ZERR relieved Captain Roy W. CASH Jr. as CVW-14. 11 November The skipper, CDR Webb, flew the first F/A-18A from McDonnell Aircraft Corporation in St. Louis to NAS Lemoore. 4 December The Navy lost an A-6 and an A-7 to anti-aircraft fire during strikes against Syrian positions in Lebanon. These were the Navy’s first fixed-wing combat losses since the end of the Vietnam War in January 1973. December The squadron received two more F/A-18 aircraft. The first class of VFA-25 pilots were doing field carrier landing practice (FCLP) in preparations for carrier qualifications aboard USS ENTERPRISE in January. The following officers served in the Fist during the transition to Hornets and first cruise: CDR Stephen “Spider” Webb LT Chris “Biscuit” Berry CDR John “Rat” Leslie LT Corey “Scorch” Moore CDR Jerry “Biter” Arbiter LT Kevin “Slick” O’Harra CDR Scott “Viking” Ronnie LT Tony “Sarge” Kiggins LCDR Greg “Shifty” Peairs LT Dave “Redbone” Martin LCDR Jerry “Lefty” Schubert LT Dan “Plug” Sigler LCDR Ken “Grubbo” Grubbs LT Keith “Kidd” Daill LCDR Steve “Warden” Davis LT Jim “Dutch” Schweke LCDR David “Grouch” Thompson LT T. D. Abrahamson LCDR Ken “Taco” Cockrell LTJG Dave “Medic”Frahm LT Karl “Hammer” Mallette LTJG Ike “Snort” Keas LT Chris “Fed” Fedyschyn LTJG J. J. Mosely LT Ed “Steady” Flora LTJG Lonnie “Pockets” Waltrip LT Dave “Redbone” Martin LTJG Steve “Fungus” Funchess LT Pat “Blox” O’Rourke CWO3 Charles “Gunner” Mach Notes: CDR Webb was CO during the transition but left the squadron prior to the cruise pursuant to a normal change of command. CDR Leslie was XO then CO for the transition and entire first cruise. CDR Arbiter was XO for the final stage of workups and the first cruise. CDR Ronnie made the full transition and workups, but left the squadron on the way to Westpac. (He was recalled by COMLATWINGPAC to fill an XO slot in another squadron.) LCDR Grubbs made much of the transition, but was pulled out of the squadron prior to cruise due to an urgent need for him on assignment in Tonopah (“Grubbo” was a PAX River F/A-18 test pilot; he did much of the CV suitability testing). LCDR Thompson was the CVW-14 LSO; he flew with the Fist and held down a Department Head job during a four-month gap until LCDR Cockrell’s arrival on the cruise. 1984 Commander in Chief - Ronald Reagan. 1 January VFA-25 began the year serving under the command of Captain Jack Zerr, Commander, Carrier Air Wing Fourteen, and under the operational control of Commodore D. B. Cargill, Commander Light Attack Wing, U. S. Pacific Fleet. 4 January Lt. Robert Goodman of VA-85 was released after being held in Syria since 4 December 1983. He was the only survivor of the A-6 shot down during the strike on Lebanon. 13 February The last instructional flight of the T-28 Trojan was flown by Ensign Michael Gierhart of VT- 27, ending the aircraft’s 31-years of training Naval Aviators. 12 March The squadron sent one aircraft to the Naval Fighter Weapons School, TOPGUN, at NAS Miramar. The plane returned on 13 April. 17/31 March VFA-25 flew 8 aircraft to Nellis AFB to participate in Green Flag. This exercise is a derivative of Red Flag, but with emphasis in electronic warfare including radar and communications jamming. The squadron acted as “Red Force” opposing the USAF “Blue Force.” April The Fist of the Fleet received its full complement of F/A-18 Hornets. 7/11 April VFA-25 flew six aircraft to USS CONSTELLATION for the ship’s Independent Steaming Exercise (ISE). May 1/25 The squadron deployed eight aircraft for refresher training (REFTRA) off Southern California. 9/16 June The squadron deployed to Fallon for air-to-ground COMPEX events. Fist pilots competed in 162 events and scored “E’s” in 110 events. There were nine events: day high dive, min. alt. release, pop-up attack, laydown, loft, over-the-shoulder, strafe, night high dive, and radar bomb. 28/29 June The squadron’s ADMAT inspection took place. Performance was exemplary, with eleven commendatory comments and zero major discrepancies. 2 July The Reserve air wing, CVWR-20, returned from a one week deployment aboard USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER, the first since 1978. 10/24 July The squadron was back aboard CONSTELLATION for SOCAL operations. 26/31 July Two aircraft were sent to San Diego to participate in Hey Rube, an exercise to develop outer air battle tactics, vector logic, within a heavy communications and radar jamming environment. 7/16 August The squadron was back aboard CONNIE for more SOCAL operations. This time with high tempo Flex Deck operations and increasing ordnance requirements. 18/31 August The squadron participated in Constant Peg at the Nellis range complex. 3/14 September The squadron was back at Fallon for Gallant Eagle 84, involving over 500 military aircraft. Pilots flew strikes against opposed positions in California and Nevada using USAF tanker assets. They also flew aggressor sorties against USAF strikes on both Nellis and Coso ranges, flew SAR CAP missions, and worked with other services at Fort Irwin, Hunter Liggett, Nellis, and Fallon. 2 October The Navy signed a contract with McDonnell Douglas to initiate full-scale development of the T-45TS jet training system to replace the T-2C and TA-4J aircraft used for intermediate and advanced jet training. October The squadron was back aboard CONNIE for Fleetex 85, starting in the SOCAL area, then working north towards San Francisco for Fleet Week 84, followed by a week off the Hawaiian Islands. CONNIE left Pearl Harbor on 2 November and the squadron returned to Lemoore on 9 November. The squadron won the first CVW-14 Tailhook competition and flew its second consecutive 700-hour month. 16 November CDR John C. LESLIE relieved CDR S. L. WEBB as Commanding Officer. 28 November Deliveries of the F/A-18 Hornet were resumed after McDonnell Douglas agreed to fix the fatigue-related problems in the tail area. 7/15 December The squadron was back at sea. Pilots worked with USMC FACs on CAS sorties to Camp Pendleton and San Clemente Island. 20/21 December The squadron stood the first VFA squadron NTPI receiving zero major and zero minor discrepancies. The squadron has flown 37,187 accident-free hours and 3.5 years FOD free, an unsurpassed record. 1985 Commander in Chief - Ronald Reagan. 1 January VFA-25 began the year serving under the command of Captain Jack Zerr, Commander, Carrier Air Wing Fourteen, and under the operational control of Commodore D. B. Cargill, Commander Light Attack Wing, U. S. Pacific Fleet. 21 February The F/A-18 Hornet deployed overseas for the first time aboard the USS CONSTELLATION with CVW-14, consisting of VF-154 (F-14), VF-21 (F-14), VFA-113 (FA-18), VFA-25 (FA- 18), VA-196 (A-6/KA-6), VAW-113 (E-2), VAQ-139 (EA-6), HS-8 (SH-3), VS-37 (S-3), and VQ-1 Det. (ES-3). This deployment was to the Western Pacific and Indian Ocean. USS Constellation, circa 1984 21 February Operational control was shifted from COMLATWINGPAC to RADM Leon "Bud" Edney, COMCARGRU ONE, and Captain John F. Calhoun, CO, USS CONSTELLATION. 8/13 March CONNIE was in port at Pearl Harbor 14 March CONNIE departed Pearl Harbor and steamed for Subic Bay.
Recommended publications
  • South Korea Section 3

    South Korea Section 3

    DEFENSE WHITE PAPER Message from the Minister of National Defense The year 2010 marked the 60th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War. Since the end of the war, the Republic of Korea has made such great strides and its economy now ranks among the 10-plus largest economies in the world. Out of the ashes of the war, it has risen from an aid recipient to a donor nation. Korea’s economic miracle rests on the strength and commitment of the ROK military. However, the threat of war and persistent security concerns remain undiminished on the Korean Peninsula. North Korea is threatening peace with its recent surprise attack against the ROK Ship CheonanDQGLWV¿ULQJRIDUWLOOHU\DW<HRQS\HRQJ Island. The series of illegitimate armed provocations by the North have left a fragile peace on the Korean Peninsula. Transnational and non-military threats coupled with potential conflicts among Northeast Asian countries add another element that further jeopardizes the Korean Peninsula’s security. To handle security threats, the ROK military has instituted its Defense Vision to foster an ‘Advanced Elite Military,’ which will realize the said Vision. As part of the efforts, the ROK military complemented the Defense Reform Basic Plan and has UHYDPSHGLWVZHDSRQSURFXUHPHQWDQGDFTXLVLWLRQV\VWHP,QDGGLWLRQLWKDVUHYDPSHGWKHHGXFDWLRQDOV\VWHPIRURI¿FHUVZKLOH strengthening the current training system by extending the basic training period and by taking other measures. The military has also endeavored to invigorate the defense industry as an exporter so the defense economy may develop as a new growth engine for the entire Korean economy. To reduce any possible inconveniences that Koreans may experience, the military has reformed its defense rules and regulations to ease the standards necessary to designate a Military Installation Protection Zone.
  • North Korea: a Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020

    North Korea: a Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020

    North Korea: A Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020 May 5, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46349 North Korea: A Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chronology ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1994 ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1998 ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2003 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2005 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2006 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2007 ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2009 ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2011 ..........................................................................................................................................
  • Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the Persian Gulf Crisis and the Federal Budget Deficit

    Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the Persian Gulf Crisis and the Federal Budget Deficit

    Address before a joint session of the Congress on the Persian Gulf crisis and the federal budget deficit. Powers and Principalities This WordPress.com site is The tAhme ecraitc’as npsa jwamitha Ds isabilities Act Conspiracy Blog Stats 11,545 hits The American with Disabilities Act Conspiracy The American with Disabilities Act was not the social security disability retirement act, and the timing of the enactment of the legislation by President George HW Bush on July 26, 1990 was an “inclusion” fraud and conspiracy with me specifically in mind, my postal hiring (orientation) had been scheduled approximately at least two months prior to my starting date of July 30, 1990. George HW Bush was Congressman from Texas, Ambassador to China, Central Intelligence director, and Vice president of the United States for eight years and President for four years. The invasion into Kuwait on August 2, 1990 was an intentional scheme act. Jury duty beginning January 14, 1991 was an extension of the scheme, with Saddam Hussein’s deadline to withdraw troops from Kuwait being on January 16, 1991 and the declaration of Desert Storm, a name chosen from the bible…..Daniel chapter 11. The 9/11/90 New World Order speech was the first speech I watched the president make as a new Federal employee. A five point speech. The directions and recommendation to fill out an EEO after the Waco, Texas siege that ended April 19, 1993, had begun was a continuation with the War crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. The timing of proposed resolutions and nominations and resolution passage and confirmations, with the presumed foresight of those involved of the conclusions of the motions.
  • Iraq: Summary of U.S

    Iraq: Summary of U.S

    Order Code RL31763 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iraq: Summary of U.S. Forces Updated March 14, 2005 Linwood B. Carter Information Research Specialist Knowledge Services Group Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Iraq: Summary of U.S. Forces Summary This report provides a summary estimate of military forces that have reportedly been deployed to and subsequently withdrawn from the U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) Area of Responsibility (AOR), popularly called the Persian Gulf region, to support Operation Iraqi Freedom. For background information on the AOR, see [http://www.centcom.mil/aboutus/aor.htm]. Geographically, the USCENTCOM AOR stretches from the Horn of Africa to Central Asia. The information about military units that have been deployed and withdrawn is based on both official government public statements and estimates identified in selected news accounts. The statistics have been assembled from both Department of Defense (DOD) sources and open-source press reports. However, due to concerns about operational security, DOD is not routinely reporting the composition, size, or destination of units and military forces being deployed to the Persian Gulf. Consequently, not all has been officially confirmed. For further reading, see CRS Report RL31701, Iraq: U.S. Military Operations. This report will be updated as the situation continues to develop. Contents U.S. Forces.......................................................1 Military Units: Deployed/En Route/On Deployment Alert ..............1
  • CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received Through the CRS Web

    CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received Through the CRS Web

    Order Code IB92117 CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iraq: Weapons Programs, U.N. Requirements, and U.S. Policy Updated September 2, 2003 Kenneth Katzman Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS History of Weapons Inspections 1997-1998 Crises Operation Desert Fox and Resolution 1284 “Axis of Evil” and U.S. Policy Resolution 1441 Wartime and Post-War WMD Search Post-War Fallout Nuclear Program Post-War Findings Chemical Weapons Post-War Findings Biological Weapons Post-War Findings Ballistic Missiles Post-War Findings Human Rights/War Crimes Issues Post-War Findings Support for International Terrorism Post-War Status Iraq-Kuwait Issues Border Issues/Kuwaiti Sovereignty Kuwaiti Detainees and Property Post-War Findings Reparations Payments Unwinding the Containment Policy Reconstruction and Ending the Oil-for-Food Program Changing U.S. Military Deployments Costs of Containment Fitting Iraq’s Ethnicities into the Post-War Political Structure Kurds/Operation Northern Watch (ONW) Shiite Muslims/Operation Southern Watch IB92117 09-02-03 Iraq: Weapons Programs, U.N. Requirements, and U.S. Policy SUMMARY After asserting that Iraq had failed to States has said it, not the United Nations, will comply with U.N. Security Council resolu- be responsible for post-war WMD searches. tions that require Iraq to rid itself of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), the Bush Admin- On November 10, 1994, Iraq accepted a istration began military action against Iraq on U.N.-designated land border with Kuwait March 19, 2003, and the regime of Saddam (confirmed by Resolution 833) as well as Hussein fell on April 9.
  • General Assembly Security Council Seventy-First Session Seventy-Second Year Agenda Item 61 Peacebuilding and Sustaining Peace

    General Assembly Security Council Seventy-First Session Seventy-Second Year Agenda Item 61 Peacebuilding and Sustaining Peace

    United Nations A/71/843–S/2017/192 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 March 2017 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Seventy-first session Seventy-second year Agenda item 61 Peacebuilding and sustaining peace Identical letters dated 6 March 2017 from the Permanent Representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council I have the honour herewith to transmit a letter with regard to aggressive joint military exercises staged by the United States and south Korea against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) from the date of 1 March 2017, in disregard of repeated warnings by the Government of DPRK and strong protests and condemnations from internal and external communities. These joint military exercises being staged by the United States in south Korea are the most undisguised nuclear war manoeuvres, to drive the Korean Peninsula and the rest of the North-East Asia region into nuclear disaster. This is to mention that all different kinds of strategic assets of the United States, not only nuclear propelled aircraft carriers but also nuclear submarines, nuclear strategic bombers and stealth fighters, are all massively enlisted in these joint military exercises, Key Resolve and Foal Eagle, to wage actual war drills in accordance with a nuclear pre-emptive plan to attack DPRK by surprise. Nobody could vouch whether, when the war drills kicked off after the introduction of a lot of nuclear strike means and huge forces into south Korea and the waters, it may go over to an actual war and, consequently, the situation on the Korean Peninsula is again inching to the brink of a nuclear war.
  • Suicide Facts Oladeinde Is a Staff Writerall for Hands Suicide Is on the Rise Nationwide

    Suicide Facts Oladeinde Is a Staff Writerall for Hands Suicide Is on the Rise Nationwide

    A L p AN Stephen Murphy (left),of Boston, AMSAN Kevin Sitterson (center), of Roper, N.C., and AN Rick Martell,of Bronx, N.Y., await the launch of an F-14 Tomcat on the flight deckof USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71). e 4 24 e 6 e e Hidden secrets Operation Deliberate Force e e The holidays are a time for giving. USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) e e proves what it is made of during one of e e Make time for your shipmates- it e e could be the gift of life. the biggest military operations in Europe e e since World War 11. e e e e 6 e e 28 e e Grab those Gifts e e Merchants say thanks to those in This duty’s notso tough e e uniform. Your ID card is worth more Nine-section duty is off to a great start e e e e than you may think. and gets rave reviews aboardUSS e e Anchorage (LSD 36). e e PAGE 17 e e 10 e e The right combination 30 e e e e Norfolk hospital corpsman does studio Sailors care,do their fair share e e time at night. Seabees from CBU420 build a Habitat e e e e for Humanity house in Jacksonville, Fla. e e 12 e e e e Rhyme tyme 36 e e Nautical rhymes bring the past to Smart ideas start here e e e e everyday life. See how many you Sailors learn the ropes and get off to a e e remember.
  • View/Print Page As PDF

    View/Print Page As PDF

    MENU Policy Analysis / Articles & Op-Eds Danger Zone by Simon Henderson Mar 27, 2012 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Simon Henderson Simon Henderson is the Baker fellow and director of the Bernstein Program on Gulf and Energy Policy at The Washington Institute, specializing in energy matters and the conservative Arab states of the Persian Gulf. Articles & Testimony eporting from the USS Abraham Lincoln in waters near Iran, Simon Henderson describes why the carrier R strike groups in the Persian Gulf are an awesome reminder of U.S. military might. View a slideshow of photos from his time aboard the supercarrier. U.S. President Barack Obama recently said that "all elements of American power" remain on the table to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. The USS Abraham Lincoln -- a nearly 100,000-ton supercarrier with a crew of around 4,800 and 50-plus aircraft -- is one of these elements. Steaming just 30 miles off the coast of Iran while launching F/A-18 Hornet strike aircraft, it is one of the most visibly impressive demonstrations of American military might. If strategic power can be measured in decibels, the flight operations of a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier must rank at the top. Even if one wears earplugs as well as ear protectors, the noise on the flight deck is overwhelming. Depending on the aircraft type and the payload it is carrying, each F/A-18 is catapulted off either at full power or with the additional fiery blast of afterburners. Similarly on landing, the throttles are opened in case the aircraft's hook does not catch on one of the four arrestor wires stretched across the deck.
  • Aircraft Collection

    Aircraft Collection

    A, AIR & SPA ID SE CE MU REP SEU INT M AIRCRAFT COLLECTION From the Avenger torpedo bomber, a stalwart from Intrepid’s World War II service, to the A-12, the spy plane from the Cold War, this collection reflects some of the GREATEST ACHIEVEMENTS IN MILITARY AVIATION. Photo: Liam Marshall TABLE OF CONTENTS Bombers / Attack Fighters Multirole Helicopters Reconnaissance / Surveillance Trainers OV-101 Enterprise Concorde Aircraft Restoration Hangar Photo: Liam Marshall BOMBERS/ATTACK The basic mission of the aircraft carrier is to project the U.S. Navy’s military strength far beyond our shores. These warships are primarily deployed to deter aggression and protect American strategic interests. Should deterrence fail, the carrier’s bombers and attack aircraft engage in vital operations to support other forces. The collection includes the 1940-designed Grumman TBM Avenger of World War II. Also on display is the Douglas A-1 Skyraider, a true workhorse of the 1950s and ‘60s, as well as the Douglas A-4 Skyhawk and Grumman A-6 Intruder, stalwarts of the Vietnam War. Photo: Collection of the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum GRUMMAN / EASTERNGRUMMAN AIRCRAFT AVENGER TBM-3E GRUMMAN/EASTERN AIRCRAFT TBM-3E AVENGER TORPEDO BOMBER First flown in 1941 and introduced operationally in June 1942, the Avenger became the U.S. Navy’s standard torpedo bomber throughout World War II, with more than 9,836 constructed. Originally built as the TBF by Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation, they were affectionately nicknamed “Turkeys” for their somewhat ungainly appearance. Bomber Torpedo In 1943 Grumman was tasked to build the F6F Hellcat fighter for the Navy.
  • Where Are the Carriers? U.S

    Where Are the Carriers? U.S

    WHERE ARE THE CARRIERS? U.S. National Strategy FRONT COVER and the Choices Ahead JOHN F. LEHMAN with Steven Wills This page was left blank for printing purposes WHERE ARE THE CARRIERS? U.S. National Strategy and the Choices Ahead This page was left blank for printing purposes WHERE ARE THE CARRIERS? U.S. National Strategy and the Choices Ahead JOHN LEHMAN, with Steven Wills Published by the Foreign Policy Research Institute 1528 Walnut Street, Suite 610, Philadelphia, PA 19102 www.fpri.org Copyright©2021 Foreign Policy Research Institute All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including inofmration storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Lehman, John, author. | Wills, Steven, author Title: Where are the Carriers? U.S. National Strategy and the Choices Ahead Identifiers: ISBN 978-0-910191-16-6 (electronic) | ISBN 978-0-910191-17-3 (print) Subjects: Political Science Printed by Creative Print Group Cover Design: Natalia Kopytnik Cover Image: United States Navy CONTENTS Executive Summary i 1. Introduction 1 2. Land-based Airpower as a Substitute for Sea-Based 24 Power 3. Can Carriers Survive in the Modern Age? 48 4. Four Options for Carrier Size and Capability 65 5. Nuclear vs. Conventional Propulsion 88 6. How Many Carriers? At What Cost? 98 7. Unmanned Carrier Aircraft: Missions and Myths 116 8. Conclusions 131 Executive summary s the United States seeks to prepare for a potential conflict withA a peer-level adversary, the debate around the utility of the aircraft carrier—and its role in such a contingency—once again has resurfaced.
  • Gulf War Era Veterans Report: Pre-9/11 (August 2, 1990 to September 10, 2001)

    Gulf War Era Veterans Report: Pre-9/11 (August 2, 1990 to September 10, 2001)

    Gulf War Era Veterans Report: Pre-9/11 (August 2, 1990 to September 10, 2001) February 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 4 SECTION I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 7 Overview .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Objective................................................................................................................................................... 8 Methodology............................................................................................................................................. 8 Design Features ........................................................................................................................................ 8 SECTION II. COHORTS ........................................................................................................................... 10 Overview ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Sorting Hierarchy ..................................................................................................................................
  • Operation TOMODACHI: a Ten-Year Commemoration the Great East Japan Earthquake and Operation TOMODACHI – Speech by General Ryoichi Oriki (JGSDF, Ret.)

    Operation TOMODACHI: a Ten-Year Commemoration the Great East Japan Earthquake and Operation TOMODACHI – Speech by General Ryoichi Oriki (JGSDF, Ret.)

    Operation TOMODACHI: A Ten-Year Commemoration The Great East Japan Earthquake and Operation TOMODACHI – Speech by General Ryoichi Oriki (JGSDF, Ret.) Translated by Ms. Shiori Okazaki Good morning, everyone. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in today’s event with the Japan U.S. Military Program (JUMP), co-organized by the Embassy of Japan in the United States and Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA. I am grateful to see Ambassador Tomita, who just assumed his post; Dr. Akimoto; and Admiral Walsh, who served as the commander of Operation TOMODACHI. It has been ten years since the Great East Japan Earthquake, which was Japan’s greatest national crisis in recent years, resulting in many casualties. I would like to once again thank those who immediately extended their support after the disaster: the U.S. government, the American people, Ambassador Roos and the staff at the U.S. Embassy in Japan, and our many friends in the U.S. military who served on the ground during Operation TOMODACHI. The areas affected by the disaster are recovering, but there are still many issues to be addressed, including decommissioning the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. As recently as last month, on February 13, a 7.3 magnitude earthquake hit Fukushima and other areas, injuring more than 150 people. This was apparently an aftershock of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Major earthquakes like these are still a traumatic reminder of 10 years ago for many Japanese people—especially those in the areas affected by the disaster. 2 Translated by Ms. Shiori Okazaki The Great East Japan Earthquake was a complex disaster consisting of an earthquake, tsunami, and the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.