DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS STIP Self-Certification ....................................................................................................................... Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... Transportation Planning Process – Overview ................................................................................. Transportation Conformity Process ................................................................................................. Transportation Plans, Programs, and the NEPA Process ............................................................... Importance of Consistency in Plans and Programs ........................................................................ STIP Content……………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………….. TIP/STIP Page Information ............................................................................................................... STIP Funding ..................................................................................................................................... STIP Financial Plan ........................................................................................................................... Public Involvement ......................................................................................... …………………………….. Acronyms/Glossary ........................................................................................................................... Appendix A ......................................................................................................................................... Grouped Project Table STIP Highway Financial Summary Statewide Programs Appendix B – STIP Public Hearing Documents…………………………………………………………………… Appendix C – Rural Consultative Process (TxDOT Districts)…………………………………………………… Appendix D – TxDOT FAST ACT Supplemental Documentation..……………………………………………… TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SELF-CERTIFICATION INTRODUCTION A safe, reliable, multimodal, performance-based transportation system is essential to the growth of the Texas economy, the safety of the traveling public, and to the quality of life for Texans of all ages. It is the Texas Department of Transportation’s (TxDOT’s) mission to – though collaboration and leadership – deliver a safe, reliable, and integrated transportation system that enables the movement of people and goods. As population growth continues to outpace transportation capacity, the continuing challenge faced by TxDOT is one of making difficult investment decisions that balance the needs of transportation system users with the limited funding available to meet those needs. Performance-based transportation plans and programs developed by TxDOT, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality’s (TCEQ) Statewide Implementation Plan (SIP) guide the state and local planning and programming activities to ensure that the department develops results-oriented programs of projects that best address state, regional, and local transportation needs (Table 1). Table1.Transportation Plans and Programs Plan/Program Developed By Approved By Time Period Content Update Cycle Texas Transportation TxDOT's operational goals and TxDOT Strategic Plan TxDOT 5 Years Every 2 Years Commission strategies Texas Transportation Plan Future goals, strategies, and Texas Transportation (Statewide Long-Range TxDOT 20+ Years performance measures for the multi- Every 4 Years Commission Plan) modal transportation system Policies, programs, and projects for development that respond to Metropolitan Transportation MPO MPO Policy Board 20+ Years adopted goals and expenditures for Every 5 Years Plan (MTP) Attainment state and federal funds over the next 20+ years Policies, programs, and projects for development that respond to Metropolitan Transportation MPO MPO Policy Board 20+ Years adopted goals and expenditures for Every 4 Years* Plan (MTP) Non-Attainment state and federal funds over the next 20+ years Multi-modal projects to be Unified Transportation Texas Transportation TxDOT 10 Years funded/implemented in a 10-year Annual Program (UTP) Commission period Transportation Improvement Governor (delegated to Multi-modal transportation Programs (TIPs) - TxDOT TxDOT Districts 4 Years Every 2 Years TxDOT) projects/investments Rural Transportation Improvement Multi-modal transportation MPOs MPO Policy Board 4 Years Every 2 Years Programs (TIPs) - MPO projects/investments Statewide Transportation Multi-modal transportation Improvement Program TxDOT USDOT (FHWA/FTA) 4 Years Every 2 Years projects/investments (STIP) A description of control strategies, or measures to deal with pollution, State Implementation Plan TCEQ & Non- EPA N/A for areas that fail to achieve national Revised as needed (SIP) Attainment MPOs ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) *Update/approval dependent on a Transportation Conformity Determination that demonstrates projects meet all air quality conformity requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments. On June 21st, 2018 the South East Texas Regional Planning Commission Metropolitan Planning Organization (SETRPC-MPO) and Jefferson-Orange-Hardin Regional Transportation Study (JOHRTS) Transportation Planning Committee approved the continuation of the JOHRTS 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for fiscal years 2019 and 2020 to be included into the 2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The JOHRTS 2017 – 2020 TIP with its amendments will be effective until December 19th, 2019 or as such time as SESTRPC - MPO demonstrates conformity of the 2019-2022 TIP. The Resolution continuing the JOHRTS FY 2017 -2020 is on the follow page. Metropolitan Planning Organizations 2018 Missouri Amarillo MPO Oklahoma Arkansas New Mexico Sherman-Denison MPO Wichita Texarkana Lubbock Falls MPO MPO MPO North Central Texas COG Tyler Area L Abilene MPO o MPO u Permian Basin i MPO Longview s MPO i El Paso San Angelo a Waco MPO MPO MPO n a Killeen-Temple Bryan-College MPO Station MPO South East Texas RPC CAMPO Alamo Victoria MPO Area MPO Houston- Galveston Area Council Laredo Urban Corpus Transportation Christi Study MPO Gulf of Hidalgo County MPO Mexico Harlingen-San Mexico Benito MPO Brownsville MPO Copyright 2018 Texas Department of Transportation Texas Department of Transportation 0 50 100 Notice Transportation Planning and Programming Division This map was produced for internal use within the Texas Department of Transportation. Miles Data Analysis, Mapping and Reporting Branch Accuracy is limited to the validity of available ° data as of December 31, 2017. July 20, 2018 Lipscomb COGs, MPOs and TxDOT Districts Dallam Sherman Hansford Ochiltree ° Hartley Moore Hutchinson Roberts Hemphill Amarillo PRPC Potter Oldham Carson Gray Wheeler Amarillo Deaf Armstrong COG Abbreviation Smith Randall Donley Collingsworth AACOG Parmer Castro Swisher Briscoe Hall Childress ARK-TEX Childress Hardeman Lamb Hale Floyd BVCOG Bailey Motley Cottle Wilbarger Wichita Foard Wichita Falls Lubbock Clay Lamar Red CAPCO Wichita Falls Montague Grayson Lubbock Fannin River Cochran Hockley Crosby Dickens King Knox Baylor Archer Cooke Sherman Lubbock NORTEX - Denison TEXOMA Paris Bowie Texarkana ARK-TEX CBCOG Delta SPAG Titus Jack Wise Franklin Stonewall Denton Collin Hopkins Morris Yoakum Terry Lynn Garza Kent Haskell Throckmorton Young Hunt Cass CTCOG Camp North Atlanta Rockwall Rains Marion Parker Central Abilene Wood Upshur CVCOG Gaines Palo Fort Tarrant Dawson Borden Scurry Jones Shackelford Stephens Pinto Texas Fisher Dallas Worth Kaufman Van Longview Harrison Zandt NCTCOG Dallas Gregg DETCOG WCTCOG Smith Abilene Hood Johnson Ellis Tyler Andrews Martin Howard Mitchell Nolan Eastland Taylor Callahan Henderson Rusk Panola ETCOG Erath Somervell Navarro Tyler ETCOG Midland Odessa Hill El Paso El Transportation Comanche Bosque Cherokee Shelby Loving Coke HOTCOG Anderson GCRPC Paso Winkler Organization Glasscock Sterling Runnels Ector Coleman Midland Brown Freestone CVCOG Hamilton Nacogdoches San Hudspeth McLennan Augustine H-GAC Culberson PBRPC Brownwood Limestone Lufkin Ward San Waco Waco Sabine Crane Mills Angelo Coryell Houston Upton Reagan CTCOG Leon Angelina Concho HOTCOG Reeves Irion Tom Green Falls Lampasas McCulloch San DETCOG Trinity Saba Central BVCOG Odessa San Bell Robertson Texas Madison Jasper LRGVDC Angelo Newton Schleicher Menard Polk Tyler Jeff Burnet Bryan Brazos Davis Pecos Milam Bryan- Walker Crockett El Paso Mason Llano Williamson MRGDC College San Grimes Jacinto Beaumont Burleson Station Sutton Kimble Austin Capital Hardin RGCOG Area Lee Montgomery NCTCOG Gillespie Blanco South Travis Washington Liberty East Orange Terrell CAPCO Bastrop H-GAC Presidio Kerr Hays Texas NORTEX Harris Edwards Austin Waller Kendall SETRPC Brewster Val Fayette Houston- Jefferson Verde Comal Caldwell Real Chambers PBRPC Bandera Galveston Colorado Area Council Fort Guadalupe MRGDC San Antonio Bend PRPC AACOG and Bexar Gonzales Galveston Lavaca Houston Kinney Uvalde County Wharton Medina Bexar GCRPC Brazoria Wilson Yoakum RGCOG San De Witt Antonio Jackson Atascosa Karnes Matagorda Maverick Zavala Frio Victoria SETRPC Victoria Goliad SPAG Calhoun Dimmit Live Bee Refugio La Salle McMullen Oak STDC Laredo Corpus Christi Aransas TEXOMA San Patricio CBCOG Corpus Webb Jim Wells Christi Duval Nueces WCTCOG Laredo Urban Transportation
Recommended publications
  • Port of Beaumont

    Port of Beaumont

    Port of Beaumont Located in Beaumont, Texas, the Port of Beaumont is accessible from the Gulf of Mexico and Intracoastal Waterway via the federally maintained Sabine-Neches Ship Channel. The fifth largest port in the nation in terms of tonnage and the largest commercial military outload port in the United States, the Port of Beaumont specializes in LEGEND breakbulk, liquid bulk, dry bulk, heavy lift, roll-on/roll- BNSF LEGEND UP/SP Trackage Rights Handling Carrier BNSF off (Ro-Ro), bulk grain and project cargoes. In 2018, Haulage Agreement UP/SP Trackage Rights the port handled more than 4.6 million tons of cargo Handling Carrier Port of Haulage Agreement Beaumont from 30 countries on five continents. TERMINAL CAPABILITIES • Harbor: One • Facilities: • Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) #115 • Berths: Eight • 24-hour security and protection • Cranes: • Warehouse and transloading • Harbor mobile crane - 140 metric ton (308,647 lbs.) capacity with extension of 168 ft. • 550,000+ sq. ft. covered storage • A variety of lift machines and mobile cranes • 109,000 sq. ft. warehouse space • Over 90 acres of open storage adjacent to • Depth: 36 ft. - 40 ft. waterfront property • Rail-Served: Single commodity (unit) and mixed freight (manifest) capable • Four railcar unloading systems • Cargo Handled: Agricultural Breakbulk Bulk Heavy Lift Project Cargo Ro-Ro Products (Roll-on/Roll-off) Aaron Matthews, Sales Manager BNSF Railway [email protected] Office: 817-304-8516 Port of Beaumont TERMINAL CAPABILITIES OVERVIEW HARBOR ISLAND MARINE TERMINAL • Depth: 40 ft. • Berth: 1,438 ft. • Facilities: • Transit shed capacity total- 245,000 sq. ft. • Open storage area– 30+ acres • Weather-protected rail loading/unloading within transit sheds • Twin marginal rail tracks extend the full length of the wharf MAIN STREET TERMINAL 1 • Facilities: • Approx.
  • Transportation Often Referred to As the ?South Texas Crossroads? Aptly

    Transportation Often Referred to As the ?South Texas Crossroads? Aptly

    Mr. Dale Fowler (CEcD, Victoria Economic Development Corporation, President) Web Site: http://victoriaedc.com Email: [email protected] Phone Number: 1.800.765.8198 Fax Number: 361.485.3190 Transportation Often referred to as the ?South Texas Crossroads? Aptly named for its outstanding location on the convergence of several major highways, the well-planned regional transportation infrastructure offers a variety of choices including rail, waterway, and air to move raw materials, finished products, and people in and out of Victoria. Highway Network and I-69 Project Victoria's excellent highway system includes US Hwy 59, US Hwy 87, US Hwy 77 with easy access to Interstate Highways I-10, I-35, and I-37. This network connects Victoria to neighboring cities, all parts of the United States, and internationally to Mexico. Victoria is the intersecting point on the "high-priority interstate I-69 corridor" project connecting south texas to Mexico. U.S. Highway 59 (future I-69) is a four-lane, divided, interstate-quality highway that extends southwest of Victoria to Laredo, and northeast to Houston where it meets I-10 and I-45. U.S. Highway 77 travels north from Victoria to the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex intersecting I-10, I-35 and I- 37, and south via a four-lane, divided highway to the Rio Grande Valley. U.S. Highway 87 travels northwest connecting Victoria with San Antonio and providing access to I-35, and to the southeast connecting with Port Lavaca. Rail Union Pacific (UP) is the primary operator of the rail lines in Victoria County. Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) and Kansas City Southern (KCS) have track rights to operate on the UP lines.
  • DOT Marine Highway Projects

    DOT Marine Highway Projects

    Cross Sound Ferry Enhancement Project Applicant: Connecticut Department of Transportation Corridor: M-95 Marine Highway Corridor (Sponsor: I-95 Corridor Coalition) Project Snapshot: The Cross Sound Ferry Enhancements Project would improve three passenger/vehicle ferries operating between New London, Connecticut and Orient Point, Long Island. Combined, the enhancements would increase capacity and efficiency of the service while reducing vessel emissions, further improving the service’s footprint. Attributes: This service provides 12,000 one-way vessel trips each year along a 16-mile water route, eliminating a 166-mile highway drive through congested portions of Long Island, New York City and Connecticut along the I-95 Corridor. The project offers the opportunity to increase capacity, saving nearly 500,000 additional highway miles. One of many public benefits offered by this project is improved livability through reduction of traffic in highly congested urban centers. Other benefits include emissions reductions, energy savings and landside transportation infrastructure maintenance savings. The U.S. Department of Transportation will work with the Connecticut Department of Transportation, the I-95 Corridor Coalition and other Federal Departments to identify appropriate actions to help expand capacity, reduce emissions and improve fuel efficiency of the vessels. New England Marine Highway Expansion Project Applicant: Maine Department of Transportation Corridor : M-95 Marine Highway Corridor (Sponsor: I-95 Corridor Coalition) Project Snapshot: The Northeast Marine Highway Expansion Project will expand an existing container-on-barge service operating between Newark, New Jersey, Boston, Massachusetts and Portland, Maine. This will be accomplished by design and construction of an articulated tug and barge that rigidly connects the two vessels.
  • 2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION

    2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION

    2019-2022 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS STIP Self-Certification ....................................................................................................................... Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... Transportation Planning Process – Overview ................................................................................. Transportation Conformity Process ................................................................................................. Transportation Plans, Programs, and the NEPA Process ............................................................... Importance of Consistency in Plans and Programs ........................................................................ STIP Content……………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………….. TIP/STIP Page Information ............................................................................................................... STIP Funding ..................................................................................................................................... STIP Financial Plan ........................................................................................................................... Public Involvement ......................................................................................... …………………………….. Acronyms/Glossary ..........................................................................................................................
  • Texas Ports 2017-2018 Capital Program: Project Summaries

    Texas Ports 2017-2018 Capital Program: Project Summaries

    Port Authority Advisory Committee TEXAS PORTS 2017 – 2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARIES Port of s Orange Port of Beaumont a Port of Cedar Bayou Port Arthur Port of Navigation District x Houston Te Port of Texas City Port of Galveston Port of Freeport Port of Bay City Calhoun Port Authority Victoria County Port of Navigation District Palacios Port of West Calhoun Aransas County Navigation District ico Port of x Corpus Christi e M f o Port Mansfield f l Port of Harlingen Port of Port Isabel u Port of Brownsville G Port Authority Advisory Committee LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN s chairman of the Port Authority Advisory Committee (PAAC), I am pleased to Apresent the Texas Ports 2017–2018 Capital Program. Texas has the most robust maritime system in the United States. In 2015, Texas was ranked first in the nation in total foreign imports and exports and second in the nation for total tonnage. The state’s maritime system continues to be a critical gateway to international trade and provides the residents of the state with a multitude of economic opportunities through the movement of waterborne commerce and trade. In 2015, the Texas Ports Association conducted an economic study focused on defining the value of Texas ports to the state and the nation. Maritime activity at Texas ports: • Moved over 563 million tons of cargo including 350 million tons of international tonnage and nearly 200 million tons of domestic cargo • Handled over 1.8 million containers • Served over 1.6 million cruise passengers • Supported over 1.5 million jobs in the state • Provided over $368 billion in total economic value to the state, 23% of the overall state GDP • Generated over $92 billion in personal income and local consumption of goods • Generated $6.9 billion of state and local taxes Texas ports are critical economic engines for their communities and the state.
  • (Cancels Tariff No. 4) Rates, Charges, Rules, Regulations

    (Cancels Tariff No. 4) Rates, Charges, Rules, Regulations

    PORT FREEPORT TARIFF NO. 005 (CANCELS TARIFF NO. 4) RATES, CHARGES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND SERVICES AVAILABLE AT PUBLIC WHARVES ISSUED BY PORT FREEPORT 1100 CHERRY ST. FREEPORT, TX 77541 TELEPHONE (979) 233-2667 ISSUED: October 26, 2017 EFFECTIVE: November 1, 2017 PORT FREEPORT TARIFF NO. 005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A SUBJECT ITEM RULE PAGE Section 1: Table of Contents 34 A - B Gulf Seaports Marine Term. Conf. 34 1 Section 1: Rules and Jurisdiction 34 2-3 Jurisdiction of Port Freeport General Authority Cargo Statements Records Access Delinquent List Application Section 2: Abbreviations 34 4 Definitions 34 4-9 Section 3: Waterway Regulations Disposal of Oily Residue and Water 305 34 9 Ballast, Rubbish, Trash 310 34 9 Signs 315 34 10 Speed Limit 320 34 10 Collisions 325 34 10 Berth Applications and Arrangements 330 34 11-12 Section 4: Regulations on Use of Facilities Bunkers and Bunkering 335 34 13 Cleanliness of Premises 340 34 13 Safety 345 34 14 Damage to Property of Port Freeport 350 34 15 Damage or Loss and Liability 355 34 15 Fire Prevention 365 34 16 Fumigation Requirements 370 34 16 Handling of Hazardous Commodities 375 34 16-17 Insurance 380 34 17-18 Port Security Measures 385 34 19-24 Port Security Fees 390 34 24-25 Payment of Bills 395 34 26-27 Stevedore Contract License 405 34 27-31 Welding/Hot Work 410 34 32 Section 5: Vessel Regulations Dockage Charges 415 34 33-34 Shed Hire 420 34 34 Pilotage Rates 425 34 35 Section 6: Space Rentals, Free Time, and Penalties Conditions Governing Merchandise 430 34 36 Free Time 435 34 36 Section 7: Equipment Charges Damage by Equipment 440 34 37 Equipment Charges 445 34 37-38 Removal of Objects from Channel 450 34 39 Responsibility of User on Equipment 39 Rented from Port Freeport 455 34 Use of Privately Owned Cranes 460 34 40 ISSUED: October 26, 2017 Effective: November 1, 2017 PORT FREEPORT TARIFF NO.
  • Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports

    Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports

    Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports Interim Report to the 85th Legislature November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAIRMAN'S LETTER………………………………………………………………. 2 REPORT SIGNATORIES…………………………………………………………….. 3 COMMITTEE COMPOSITION AND PROCEEDINGS……………………………. 4 BACKGROUND AND HISTORY……………………………………………………. 5 ISSUES AND FINDINGS……………………………………………………………...17 RECOMMENDATIONS ……………………………………………………………...21 1 Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports November 18, 2016 Dear Members and Fellow Texans: Enclosed is the interim report for the Senate Select Committee on Texas Ports, commissioned by Lt. Governor Patrick. I would like to thank him for his attention to these essential waypoints of the Texas economy and for the privilege of chairing the Committee. In the past months, my Senate colleagues and I have studied our state’s port assets (both coastal and inland hubs) and paid particular attention to the economic impact of the Panama Canal expansion. We have arrived at a number of conclusions on the matter of what our state’s economy must do to compete and grow. Thanks to the tireless efforts of this committee and the enthusiastic support of port authorities across the state, we have a much clearer picture of the unique role Texas ports play in our state’s economy. They are indispensable gateways to trade and economic growth which have fueled our state’s rise to the top ranking among America’s exporting states. That ranking is reflective of our ports’ ability to handle more than 20 percent of our nation’s total export tonnage. As improvements to the Panama Canal create a flow of larger vessels from distant trading partners, we must ensure Texas ports are equipped to sustain our economic leadership role.
  • Texas Port Mission Plan: Investment Strategy

    Texas Port Mission Plan: Investment Strategy

    PORT AUTHORITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE TEXAS PORT MISSION PLAN: INVESTMENT STRATEGY 86TH LEGISLATIVE SESSION Port Authority Advisory Committee TEXAS PORT MISSION PLAN: INVESTMENT STRATEGY 86TH LEGISLATIVE SESSION TABLE OF CONTENTS Project cargo at the Calhoun Port Authority. Letter From the Chairwoman ..................................... ii The Port Authority Advisory Committee (PAAC) ..... iii Mission ...................................................................... iii Purpose ........................................................................ 1 Statewide Impact ...................................................... 1 Port Investment is a Statewide Growth Strategy .... 2 Capital Investment ..................................................... 2 Resiliency .................................................................. 2 Types of Port Facilities ............................................... 4 Barge moving cargo near the Port of Harlingen. Port System Overview ................................................ 6 How the Port System Works ...................................... 8 Waterways ................................................................. 9 Port Facilities ............................................................. 9 Inland Connectivity .................................................... 9 Port Capital Program ............................................... 10 Ship Channel Improvement Report ...........................11 Port Connectivity Report...........................................11 Planned Port System
  • Appendix B Technical Memorandum

    Appendix B Technical Memorandum

    APPENDIX B TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN Texas Transportation Plan Tech Memo 1: Plan Assessment and Framework October 10, 2013 Acknowledgements PREPARED FOR: Michelle Conkle PREPARED BY: Michelle Maggiore, Alyson Welsh-Reaves QUALITY REVIEWERS: Steve Dilts Contents . 1.0 Introduction page 3 . 2.0 Plan Assessment page 3 – 2.1 Ongoing TxDOT Initiatives and Implications for the TTP page 3 – 2.2 TxDOT Plans for TTP Coordination page 4 – 2.3 Potential Challenges for the Texas Transportation System page 6 – 2.4 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Legislative Requirements page 7 . 3.0 Plan Framework page 9 – 3.1 Goals and Objectives page 9 – 3.2 Performance Measures page 12 – 3.3 Project Selection and Resource Allocation page 16 – 3.4 Performance Data Collection, Monitoring, and Reporting page 17 . 4.0 Plan Outreach page 19 – 4.1 Plan Outreach Requirements page 19 – 4.2 Texas Transportation Plan Outreach page 20 . 5.0 Plan Communication/Data Presentation page 20 – 5.1 Best Practices in Plan Communication/ Data Presentation page 20 – 5.2 Texas Transportation Plan Communication/ Data Presentation page 22 . 6.0 Recommended Plan Framework page 22 Exhibits . Exhibit 1: TxDOT Mission, Values, and Goals as defined in the 2013-2017 Strategic Plan . Exhibit 2: TxDOT Plans for Coordination with TTP (Source: 2035 SLRTP) . Exhibit 3: DRAFT TTP Goal and Objective “Building Blocks” . Exhibit 4: TTP Goal and Objective Development Process . Exhibit 5: U.S. DOT Guidance on MAP-21 Performance Rulemaking . Exhibit 6: TxDOT Performance Measures Recommended for National Use and AASHTO SCOPM Recommendations for National Performance Measures . Exhibit 7: Common State DOT Data Systems .
  • Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook

    Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook

    TTI: 0-6890 Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook Technical Report 0-6890-P1 Cooperative Research Program TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration and the Texas Department of Transportation http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6890-P1.pdf PORT AUTHORITY TRANSPORTATION REINVESTMENT ZONE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDEBOOK by: Rafael M. Aldrete Abhisek Mudgal Senior Research Scientist Assistant Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Sharada Vadali Juan Carlos Villa Associate Research Scientist Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Carl James Kruse Lorenzo Cornejo Research Scientist Assistant Transportation Researcher Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute David Salgado Deog Sang Bae Associate Transportation Researcher Graduate Assistant Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Product 0-6890-P1 Project 0-6890 Project Title: Tools for Port TRZs and TRZs for Multimodal Applications Performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation Published: March 2017 TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER The contents of this product reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies
  • Texas Ports and Courts Update

    Texas Ports and Courts Update

    Texas Ports and Courts Update March 2021 1. COVID-19 Ports Update We have collected and summarized these items to In response to decreasing COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations, the help keep you apprised of the latest news and Governor of Texas recently rescinded statewide public occupancy developments from the ports and courts on the restrictions and mask mandates. Businesses are free to enforce their Texas coast. own restrictions, and many have kept their previous requirements in place. Texas port/terminal facilities nearly uniformly continue to require the same preventative measures (e.g., masks, temperature checks, physical distancing, etc.) despite the Governor’s recent announcement. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Coast Guard, and many vessel agents continue to board vessels and conduct activities in person. Vessels still need to advise CBP and Coast Guard boarding teams of any In this Update: crew illnesses prior to embarkation. Vessels are also required to notify the Coast Guard Captain of the Port of any crewmember showing symptoms consistent with COVID-19. 1. COVID-19 Ports Update Rapid COVID-19 testing is generally available, and test administrations can be scheduled and completed in relatively short timeframes. 2. Recent Port Activity & Shore leave remains allowed. Crew changes/repatriation requests are Development Projects permitted on a case-by-case basis. Off-signing crewmembers are generally required to proceed directly to 3. News from the Courts the airport for their flights, and overnight hotel stays are typically not permitted. CBP is generally requiring the following items in relation to a crewmember’s repatriation requests: (1) passport bio page; (2) C1/D visa; (3) I-95 landing permit; and (4) e-tickets with direct flights departing the U.S.
  • Port At-A-Glance

    Port At-A-Glance

    PORT AT-A-GLANCE Port of Orange • Orange, TX Orange County Navigation & Port District Legal Name: Orange County Navigation and Port District 1201 Childers Road Draft: Deep Table of Contents Orange, Texas 77632 (409) 883-4363 Depth: 30 ft. channel www.portoforange.com Width: 200 ft. 1. Calhoun Port Authority Port Director 2. Port of Bay City Gene Bouillion Tonnage¹ 3. Port of Beaumont Quick Facts: The Port of Orange is 94,504 4. Port of BrownsvilleF oreign Trade Zone: #117 located on the Sabine- Neches waterway and is 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,0005. 100,000Port of Corpus Christi linked to the “Golden Triangle” ports which 6. Port Freeport include the Port of Port Arthur, Beaumont and 7. Port of Galveston Orange. This area has 8. Port of Harlingen become strategically more important to Texas Annual Economic Impact: $ 1.9 million9. Port of Houston ports growth since 2003. 10. Port of Port Isabel The Port of Orange has Top Commodities Connectivity acted as a successful 11. Port of Orange landlord port, On-site Marine Services which Rail complementing activities include: 12. Port of PalaciosOrange Port Terminal at larger ports on the Shipyards that can Railway providing Sabine-Neches channel. accommodate new 13. Port of Portswitching Arthur service to It is also used for lay construction Union Pacific and berthing. 14. Port of Port Mansfield Repairs of tugs, barges and agreement with BNSF. offshore petroleum drilling 15. Port of Texas City platforms Roadway Connection Dry dock services for barges 16. Port of VictoriaSH 87 and tugs IH 10 17.