Pollination Biology of Aplectrum Hyemale

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Minnesota Plant Press The Minnesota Native Plant Society Newsletter www.mnnps.org Volume 31 Number 4 Fall 2012 Monthly meetings Thompson Park Center/Dakota Leaders give continuity Lodge Thompson County Park to Native Plant Society 1200 Stassen Lane by Scott Milburn, president simplistic task, especially when the West St. Paul, MN 55118 Continuity has been critical to editor is constantly dealing with a maintaining our Society as our president’s late column. Programs organization moves into our fourth The Minnesota Native Plant decade. We held officer elections at In the near future, we will need Society meets the first Thursday our Sept. 9 board meeting and re- someone to step forward to take in October, November, December, elected all four officers from the last over as editor of the Plant Press. February, March, April, May, and term. This will entail overseeing the June. Check at www.mnnps.org for content and format of the newsletter. more program information. I would like to point out that this It would be preferable for someone 6 p.m. — Social period will be Ron and Cathy Hubers’ to initially work with Gerry in order 7 – 9 p.m. — Program, Society eighth year as treasurer, Shirley to provide that needed continuity. I business. Mah Kooyman’s seventh year as encourage those that are interested Nov. 1: Climate Change and the vice president, my seventh year as to contact both Gerry and me. Temperate-Boreal Forest Ecotone, president, and Andrés Morantes’ by Dr. Lee Frelich, professor, fourth year as secretary. Other Issues facing Society Department of Forest Resources, positions within the organization In looking forward to this next University of Minnesota. Plant- have been held for multiple years, year and beyond, it is important of-the-Month: Pennsylvania sedge and in my view, that’s a great thing. to keep evaluating our trajectory. (Carex pensylvanica), also by Dr. We will be discussing this more at Frelich. Seed exchange. (See article New editor is needed future board meetings, but I invite on page 2.) As I learn more about other non- the membership to speak up. In my profit organizations, I am extremely last column, I mentioned the topics Dec. 6: “The eastern larch beetle: impressed by the workhorses in our of School Trust Lands and cattle Historical perspectives and current group, from Ken Arndt and field grazing on intact prairie. We need to significance to forest health in trips, to Elizabeth Heck and the continue exploring these issues and Minnesota,” by Fraser McKee, Ph.D. website. student, Department of Entomology, Continued on page 6 University of Minnesota. POM: Someone who really deserves Tamarack (Larix laricina), also by appreciation is Gerry Drewry for Mr. McKee. her contribution as editor of the In this issue Plant Press. Did anyone realize that Society news ...........................2 Feb. 7: Program to be announced. she has been in her current role since New members .........................2 Check the website (www.mnnps. 1999? How Putty-root is pollinated ....3 org) for details. Iron Horse SNA field trip ......4 MNNPS questions? Gerry has already been recognized Prairie Plan update ...................5 by the Society with a lifetime Aquatic Plants book review ....6 Go to www.mnnps.org to see the honorary membership, but she Is that plant native? ..........6 Society blog, news about field trips, deserves much more. Putting Taxa notes: Trees are ‘girls’ ...7 meetings, and committees, and all together a newsletter is not a Plant Lore: Swamp lousewort ..7 issues of this newsletter since 1982. Seed exchange Treasurers’ MNNPS Board will be Nov. 1 report for third Members are encouraged to of Directors collect seeds from Minnesota native quarter of year President: Scott Milburn, board member, [email protected] plants that are growing on their own Treasurers Ron and Cathy Huber property and bring the seeds to the report that income for the first nine Vice President: Shirley Mah tables just inside the lodge before months of the year totaled $14,018 Kooyman, shirley.mah.kooyman@ the Nov. 1 meeting. and expenses totaled $12,420. This mnnps.org Seeds must be packaged in was a net gain of $1,598. Secretary, program coordinator: envelopes or small containers and Andrés Morantes, andres. labeled with the plant’s name, Assets include $17,819 in the [email protected] scientific name (if known), habitat checking account, $8,990 in type, location of source, and name certificates of deposit, and $55 Treasurers, membership data of donor. No bulk seeds will be cash, for a total of $26,864. base: Ron and Cathy Huber, ron. accepted. [email protected] Expenses included seven- Ken Arndt is in charge of the months’ rent, $2,078, for Dakota Ken Arndt: board member, field exchange. He needs volunteers Lodge. Communication printing trip chair, [email protected] to receive the seeds, help arrange costs, including the newsletter, John Arthur: board member, john. them, answer questions, and take membership directory, meeting [email protected] down the tables. postcards, and new member packets totaled $785. Postage was $375. Steve Eggers: board member, steve. MNNPS welcomes Total communication costs were [email protected] $1,191. Otto Gockman: board member, new members [email protected] The Society gives a warm welcome The Hubers anticipate fourth- to two new members who joined quarter expenses of $2,218. Daniel Jones: board member,daniel. during the third quarter of 2012. These include $1,000 for the [email protected] Listed alphabetically, they are: Bud Markhardt memorium, Peter Jordan: board member, peter. Kaija Hermetag, Minneapolis; $505 for insurance, $344 for [email protected] Matthew Jahnke, Duluth; communications, and $265 for the Emily Peters, Minneapolis. website. Mike Lynch: board member, mike. [email protected] Stephen G. Saupe: board member, Minnesota Native Plant Society’s purpose [email protected] (Abbreviated from the bylaws) This organization is exclusively organized and operated for Memberships: memberships. [email protected] educational and scientific purposes, including the following. 1. Conservation of all native plants. Field Trips: fieldtrips.mnnps@ 2. Continuing education of all members in the plant sciences. mnnps.org 3. Education of the public regarding environmental protection of plant Historian-Archives: Roy Robison, life. historian-archives.mnnps@mnnps. 4. Encouragement of research and publications on plants native to org Minnesota. Technical or membership 5. Study of legislation on Minnesota flora, vegetation, ecosytems. inquiries: contact.mnnps@mnnps. 6. Preservation of native plants, plant communities, and scientific and org natural areas. 7. Cooperation in programs concerned with the ecology of natural Webmaster: Elizabeth Heck, [email protected] resources and scenic features. 8. Fellowship with all persons interested in native plants through Minnesota Plant Press editor: meetings, lectures, workshops, and field trips. Gerry Drewry, 651-463-8006; [email protected] 2 availability between the blooming Pollination Biology of period for A. hyemale and the earlier Aplectrum hyemale (Putty-root blooming spring ephemerals. or Adam and Eve orchid) Freshly placed pollen from another flower was never observed by Charles L. Argue, Ph.D., on the stigma. In fact, 26 hours of research associate, Department observation over four days revealed of Plant Biology, University of only about 12 individuals of the Minnesota, and MNNPS member. short-tongued bee, Lasioglossum This article is modified from his oblongum (Lovell) visiting the book, The Pollination Biology of flowers. Most merely landed on the North American Orchids, vol. 2. inflorescences, remaining for up to Springer, New York (2012). one-half minute. Only five entered Aplectrum hyemale (Muhl. ex flowers. Each entered only one and Willd.) Nutt. is chiefly an orchid remained about five seconds. None of moist, shady deciduous forests were observed bearing pollen either dominated by sugar maple, before or after the flower visit. basswood, beech, and red oak. It In one case, a bee dislodged the often occurs scattered in dense anther-cap, and although no pollen aggregations and shows a preference was removed, two pollen masses for rich, fine-textured, loamy and were observed to be in contact slightly alkaline soils. with the stigma following the bee’s Capable of withstanding a wide Aplectrum hyemale (Putty- departure. Thus, insect-facilitated variety of climatic conditions, it root) inflorescence. Photo self-pollination could be a factor. ranges from Minnesota, southern by David G. Smith (www. Although gene flow through pollen Quebec and Massachusetts delawarewildflowers.org/), may occur, the available data do to Oklahoma and Georgia; in used with permission. not confirm any actual transfer Minnesota it is restricted to the of pollen between plants, and in southeastern quadrant of the state. with no loss in seed production or Hogan’s opinion, A. hyemale is The present account provides viability (no inbreeding depression). routinely autogamous and perhaps, summary information on the agamospermous. The very limited genetic compatibility, breeding Although fruit set occurred in pollinator visitation rates in this system, pollination mechanisms, over 80 percent of flowers that species may have favored selection and fruiting success of this orchid. were left to be pollinated naturally for autogamy. Another worker, Paul (open pollinated), pollinators were Catling, has also reported autogamy Leaf measurements suggest that rarely seen. Only about one out of in Illinois and Canadian populations plants must attain some minimum 50 flowers was visited during a five- of this orchid. size before flowering, and only one day flowering period. The frequency or two individuals from aggregates of insect visits to A. hymeale was The usual sequence of events of 100 or more may flower in a only about 1/4000th of what other leading to pollination was the same given year. In a pioneering two- scientists recorded at the same in open-pollinated inflorescences year study in east central Illinois, site for earlier blooming spring and inflorescences enclosed to Kevin Hogan, from the University ephemerals.
Recommended publications
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE

    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE

    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts

    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts

    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
  • Phylogeny, Character Evolution and the Systematics of Psilochilus (Triphoreae)

    Phylogeny, Character Evolution and the Systematics of Psilochilus (Triphoreae)

    THE PRIMITIVE EPIDENDROIDEAE (ORCHIDACEAE): PHYLOGENY, CHARACTER EVOLUTION AND THE SYSTEMATICS OF PSILOCHILUS (TRIPHOREAE) A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Erik Paul Rothacker, M.Sc. ***** The Ohio State University 2007 Doctoral Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. John V. Freudenstein, Adviser Dr. John Wenzel ________________________________ Dr. Andrea Wolfe Adviser Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology Graduate Program COPYRIGHT ERIK PAUL ROTHACKER 2007 ABSTRACT Considering the significance of the basal Epidendroideae in understanding patterns of morphological evolution within the subfamily, it is surprising that no fully resolved hypothesis of historical relationships has been presented for these orchids. This is the first study to improve both taxon and character sampling. The phylogenetic study of the basal Epidendroideae consisted of two components, molecular and morphological. A molecular phylogeny using three loci representing each of the plant genomes including gap characters is presented for the basal Epidendroideae. Here we find Neottieae sister to Palmorchis at the base of the Epidendroideae, followed by Triphoreae. Tropidieae and Sobralieae form a clade, however the relationship between these, Nervilieae and the advanced Epidendroids has not been resolved. A morphological matrix of 40 taxa and 30 characters was constructed and a phylogenetic analysis was performed. The results support many of the traditional views of tribal composition, but do not fully resolve relationships among many of the tribes. A robust hypothesis of relationships is presented based on the results of a total evidence analysis using three molecular loci, gap characters and morphology. Palmorchis is placed at the base of the tree, sister to Neottieae, followed successively by Triphoreae sister to Epipogium, then Sobralieae.
  • Vegetative Anatomy of Calypsoeae (Orchidaceae) William Louis Stern Florida International University

    Vegetative Anatomy of Calypsoeae (Orchidaceae) William Louis Stern Florida International University

    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Faculty Research & Creative Activity Biological Sciences January 2008 Vegetative anatomy of Calypsoeae (Orchidaceae) William Louis Stern Florida International University Barbara S. Carlsward Eastern Illinois University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/bio_fac Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Stern, William Louis and Carlsward, Barbara S., "Vegetative anatomy of Calypsoeae (Orchidaceae)" (2008). Faculty Research & Creative Activity. 265. http://thekeep.eiu.edu/bio_fac/265 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Research & Creative Activity by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LANKESTERIANA 8(1): 105-112. 2008. VEGETATIVE ANATOMY OF CALYPSOEAE (ORCHIDACEAE) WILLIAM LOUIS STERN1 & BARBARA S. CARLSWARD2,3 1Department of Biological Sciences, Biscayne Bay Campus, MSB 357, Florida International University, North Miami, Florida 33181, USA 2Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois 61920-3099, USA 3Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Calypsoeae represent a small tribe of anatomically little-known orchids with a wide distribution in the Western Hemisphere. Leaves are present in all genera, except Corallorhiza and Wullschlaegelia both of which are subterranean taxa. Stomata are abaxial (ad- and abaxial in Aplectrum) and tetracytic (anomocytic in Calypso). Fiber bundles are absent in leaves of all taxa examined except Govenia tingens. Stegmata are present in leaves of only Cremastra and Govenia. Roots are velamentous, except in filiform roots of Wullschlaegelia. Vegetative anatomy supports a relationship between Wullschlaegelia and Corallorhiza but does not support the grouping of winter-leaved Aplectrum and Tipularia nor proposed groupings of genera based on pollinarium features.
  • A Two Year Population Ecology Study of Puttyroot Orchid (Aplectrum Hyemale (Muhl

    A Two Year Population Ecology Study of Puttyroot Orchid (Aplectrum Hyemale (Muhl

    2014. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 123(2):131–137 A TWO YEAR POPULATION ECOLOGY STUDY OF PUTTYROOT ORCHID (APLECTRUM HYEMALE (MUHL. EX WILLD.) TORR.) IN CENTRAL INDIANA Megan E. Smith1 and Alice L. Heikens2: Department of Biology, Franklin College, 101 Branigin Boulevard, Franklin, IN 46131 USA ABSTRACT. Aplectrum hyemale, puttyroot orchid, is a terrestrial, winter perennial found in rich, mesic forests throughout the Midwest as well as in Hougham Woods Biological Field Station (HWBFS) near Franklin in Johnson County, Indiana. This orchid overwinters as a single basal leaf that may produce a flowering shoot in spring. The size of the Aplectrum population at HWBFS remained relatively stable with 305 to 311 individuals during this 2012-2013 study. Only 2.9% of the plants flowered and only one plant produced fruits in 2012. No flowering or fruiting occurred in 2013. Plants that produced flowering shoots had basal leaves that were larger than the vegetative plants. However, basal leaf size was not correlated with the number of flowers per plant. It appears that weather, including the unusually warm spring and summer drought in 2012 and the dry spring in 2013, affected phenology and reproduction of Aplectrum. Keywords: Aplectrum hyemale, puttyroot, Adam-and-Eve orchid, mesic woods, phenology INTRODUCTION used as a paste to mend broken pottery (Correll Puttyroot orchid, Aplectrum hyemale,is 1950; Whiting & Catling 1986). It is also known a winter perennial that is found throughout as the Adam-and-Eve orchid because of the the eastern deciduous forest in mesic woods in paired corms (Porcher & Rayner 2001).
  • Systematics, Phylogeography, Fungal Associations, and Photosynthesis

    Systematics, Phylogeography, Fungal Associations, and Photosynthesis

    Systematics, Phylogeography, Fungal Associations, and Photosynthesis Gene Evolution in the Fully Mycoheterotrophic Corallorhiza striata Species Complex (Orchidaceae: Epidendroideae) Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Craig Francis Barrett, M. S. Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology ***** The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Dr. John V. Freudenstein, Advisor Dr. John W. Wenzel Dr. Andrea D. Wolfe Copyright by Craig Francis Barrett 2010 ABSTRACT Corallorhiza is a genus of obligately mycoheterotrophic (fungus-eating) orchids that presents a unique opportunity to study phylogeography, taxonomy, fungal host specificity, and photosynthesis gene evolution. The photosysnthesis gene rbcL was sequenced for nearly all members of the genus Corallorhiza; evidence for pseudogene formation was found in both the C. striata and C. maculata complexes, suggesting multiple independent transitions to complete heterotrophy. Corallorhiza may serve as an exemplary system in which to study the plastid genomic consequences of full mycoheterotrophy due to relaxed selection on photosynthetic apparatus. Corallorhiza striata is a highly variable species complex distributed from Mexico to Canada. In an investigation of molecular and morphological variation, four plastid DNA clades were identified, displaying statistically significant differences in floral morphology. The biogeography of C. striata is more complex than previously hypothesized, with two main plastid lineages present in both Mexico and northern North America. These findings add to a growing body of phylogeographic data on organisms sharing this common distribution. To investigate fungal host specificity in the C. striata complex, I sequenced plastid DNA for orchids and nuclear DNA for fungi (n=107 individuals), and found that ii the four plastid clades associate with divergent sets of ectomycorrhizal fungi; all within a single, variable species, Tomentella fuscocinerea.
  • Diversity and Evolution of Monocots

    Diversity and Evolution of Monocots

    Lilioids - petaloid monocots 4 main groups: Diversity and Evolution • Acorales - sister to all monocots • Alismatids of Monocots – inc. Aroids - jack in the pulpit ! • Lilioids (lilies, orchids, yams) – grade, non-monophyletic – petaloid . orchids and palms . ! • Commelinoids – Arecales – palms – Commelinales – spiderwort – Zingiberales –banana – Poales – pineapple – grasses & sedges Lilioids - petaloid monocots Asparagales: *Orchidaceae - orchids • finish the Asparagales by 1. Terrestrial/epiphytes: plants looking at the largest family - typically not aquatic the orchids 2. Geophytes: herbaceous above ground with below ground modified perennial stems: bulbs, corms, rhizomes, tubers 3. Tepals: showy perianth in 2 series of 3 each; usually all petaloid, or outer series not green and sepal-like & with no bracts 1 *Orchidaceae - orchids *Orchidaceae - orchids The family is diverse with about 880 genera and over 22,000 All orchids have a protocorm - a feature restricted to the species, mainly of the tropics family. Orchids are • structure formed after germination and before the mycotrophic (= fungi development of the seedling plant dependent) lilioids; • has no radicle but instead mycotrophic tissue some are obligate mycotrophs Cypripedium acaule Corallorhiza striata Stemless lady-slipper Striped coral root Dactylorhiza majalis protocorm *Orchidaceae - orchids *Orchidaceae - orchids Cosmopolitan, but the majority of species are found in the Survive in these epiphytic and other harsh environments via tropics and subtropics, ranging from sea
  • NOPES Newsletter 3 20Small

    NOPES Newsletter 3 20Small

    Newsletter of the Native Orchid Preservation and Education Society nativeorchidpreservationeducationsociety.com March 2020 Letter from the President President’s note: With the recent time change and our warm weather, I’m beginning to feel like spring is almost here! Spring makes me think of flowers popping up out of the ground and that means orchids will also start popping up! With the guidance of public health authorities, NOPES’ planned spring events have been cancelled through April. You can still enjoy nature by practicing social distancing and trail etiquette on your own and Ohioans can see three native orchids that have evolved to make use of the winter sun when the trees are bare. Tipularia discolor and Aplectrum hyemale lose their leaves by the time that they bloom while Goodyera pubescens is evergreen. We have been approved for our 501(c) (3) status! Our status was retroactive to our incorporation date of March 25, 2019! This means that donations for our general operations and for special projects as well as our volunteers’ out of pocket expenses after that date are tax deductible to the extent allowed by law. Big thanks to Jan Yates, Ann Tsui and Jeanne Rhinehart for making this happen! Next month is Ohio Native Plant Month! 2020 is the first year! I hope to see everyone soon! Teresa Huesman NOPES Planned hikes and workdays. Orchids present on these dates are dependent on the seasonal weather variation and some later dates may change. If you wish to attend, let Teresa [email protected]. March 19 – CANCELED! Workday at Cedar Bog with ONAPA 10:30 to 3:30 March 28 – CANCELED! Hike at Wahkeena Nature Preserve 10:00 to 3:00 pack a lunch and bring water May 16 – Dayton Metro Parks May 23 – Cedar Bog June 6 – Waterloo Nature Preserve, Michigan July 17-18 - Hike and membership meeting at Lake Hope.
  • A New Orchid Genus, Danxiaorchis, and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Tribe Calypsoeae

    A New Orchid Genus, Danxiaorchis, and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Tribe Calypsoeae

    A New Orchid Genus, Danxiaorchis, and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Tribe Calypsoeae Jun-Wen Zhai1,2,3, Guo-Qiang Zhang2,8, Li-Jun Chen2, Xin-Ju Xiao2, Ke-Wei Liu2,7, Wen-Chieh Tsai4,Yu- Yun Hsiao4, Huai-Zhen Tian5, Jia-Qiang Zhu6, Mei-Na Wang2, Fa-Guo Wang1, Fu-Wu Xing1*, Zhong- Jian Liu2,7,8,9* 1 South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China, 2 Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, The National Orchid Conservation Center of China and The Orchid Conservation and Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China, 3 Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 4 Institute of Tropical Plant Sciences and Orchid Research Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan, 5 School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China, 6 Information Center of Renhua County, Shaoguan, China, 7 Center for Biotechnology and BioMedicine, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China, 8 Landscape College of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China, 9 College of Forestry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China Abstract Background: Orchids have numerous species, and their speciation rates are presumed to be exceptionally high, suggesting that orchids are continuously and actively evolving. The wide diversity of orchids has attracted the interest of evolutionary biologists. In this study, a new orchid was discovered on Danxia Mountain in Guangdong, China. However, the phylogenetic clarification of this new orchid requires further molecular, morphological, and phytogeographic analyses. Methodology/Principal Findings: A new orchid possesses a labellum with a large Y-shaped callus and two sacs at the base, and cylindrical, fleshy seeds, which make it distinct from all known orchid genera.
  • December 2003, Volume 21 No. 4

    December 2003, Volume 21 No. 4

    On The Fringe Journal of the Native Plant Society of Northeastern Ohio 2003 Annual Dinner Our 21st Annual Dinner guests enjoyed beautiful weather, elegant surroundings in the Dinosaur Hall of the Cleveland Museum of Natural History, and a marvelous talk by Ann Haymond Zwinger sponsored jointly by the Museum’s Explorer Series. The 500-seat auditorium was filled almost to capacity. Zwinger’s subject was American alpine tundra plants, and she concentrated on those growing in the southern Rockies of Colorado where the descent from Asian roots has been unbroken by glaciation or other disruptions. The recipients of the Native Plant Society’s Annual Grant of $500 were officially recognized at the dinner. Ann Malmquist prefaced her announcement of the award with an appreciation of the CMNH and its growing importance as an intellectual and educational resource in Ohio and nearby states. RENEW NOW Our membership year runs from January to December. Please renew at the highest possible level for 2004 2003 Annual Grant Cleveland Museum of Natural History Tonight we award the Annual Grant to two students at The Dayton Museum of Natural History is no longer collection- Cleveland State University, Timothy Jones and Pedro Lake. based and has fired all of its curators. The Cincinnati Museum of They are Seniors at CSU and former students of George Natural History has moth-balled all of its collections and has laid Wilder. Pedro is also involved in creating a Manual of the off the curatorial staff. Columbus has NO natural history museum. Between New York and Chicago, only the Cleveland Museum of Grasses of Ohio with completion due in Spring Natural History and the Carnegie Museum still operate at full tilt.
  • Interactions Between Decomposing Wood, Mycorrhizas, and Terrestrial Orchid Seeds and Protocorms

    Interactions Between Decomposing Wood, Mycorrhizas, and Terrestrial Orchid Seeds and Protocorms

    Interactions between decomposing wood, mycorrhizas, and terrestrial orchid seeds and protocorms Dennis F. Whighaml , Jay O'NeilJl, Melissa McCormickl , Cynthia Smithl , Hanne Rasmussen2, Bruce CaldwelP and Tim Danie1l4 1. Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, USA, email: [email protected] 2. Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, Hoersholm, Denmark 3. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA 4. Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, Scotland Abstract We describe field and laboratory experiments designed to determine if wood in various stages of decomposition is a suitable substrate for terrestrial orchid symbionts. Five orchid species (Goodyera pubescens (WILLD.) R. BR., Liparis Wifolia (L.) L.C.M. RICH EX LINDL., Tipularia discolor (PURSH) NUTTALL, Aplectrum hyemale (NUTT.) TORR., Corallorhiza odontorhiza (WILLD.) NUTTALL) were used in the experiments. Seeds of G. pubescens were the only ones to readily germinate in the field and the presence of a symbiont reduced the time that it took for seeds to germinate in the laborato­ ry. Seeds of L. Wifolia germinated best in the presence of a symbiont in laboratory experiments. Protocorms of G. pubescens and L. Wifolia only grew when they developed mycorrhizas. Goodyera pubescens protocorms were able to develop mycorrhizas with fungi that had been isolated from adults and protocorms ofthe same species as well as some fungi isolated from other orchid species. Goodyera pubescens is, thus, more ofa generalist species than L. Wifolia, which developed mycor­ rhizas with only a single type of fungus. Protocorms of both species grew on all types of wood media used in the experiments. Seeds of the other species probably did not germinate in the field because the germination substrates lacked the required fungi.
  • Diversity and Floristics of Monocots

    Diversity and Floristics of Monocots

    Diversity and Floristics of Monocots . aroids, lilies, orchids . The Monocots We will finish our survey of angiosperms by going back to the basal angiosperms and take a look at the monocotyledons - those possessing one seed leaf. The other main features of the monocots separating them from all other flowering plants are: 1. 3-merous flowers The Monocots We will finish our survey of angiosperms by going back to the basal angiosperms and take a look at the monocotyledons - those possessing one seed leaf. The other main features of the monocots separating them from all other flowering plants are: 1. 3 - merous flowers 2. Parallel-veined leaves The Monocots We will finish our survey of angiosperms by going back to the basal angiosperms and take a look at the monocotyledons - those possessing one seed leaf. The other main features of the monocots separating them from all other flowering plants are: 1. 3 - merous flowers 2. Parallel-veined leaves 3. Absence of woody tissue The Aquatic Monocots emergent Emergent, floating, or submerged aquatic group of monocots These are the first diverging monocots submerged floating The Aquatic Monocots Associated with the aquatic habit is the trend from insect-pollinated, showy flowers to water-pollinated, reduced flowers The group shows increasing effort to vegetative reproduction over sexual reproduction Showy flowers, insect-pollinated Reduced unisexual flowers, water-pollinated *Alismataceae - water plantain family Aquatic or wetland family, especially in north temperate regions Leaves long petioled, often